PEDIATRIC UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE MANAGEMENT JULIA RAWLINGS, MD SPORTS MEDICINE SYMPOSIUM: THE PEDIATRIC ATHLETE 2 MARCH 2018
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 DISCLOSURE
• I have nothing to disclose.
2
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 OBJECTIVES
Discuss the diagnosis, management, and outcome of common pediatric upper extremity fractures: – Forearm Fractures – Supracondylar Fractures – Medial Epicondyle Fractures – Lateral Condyle Fractures – Proximal Humerus Fractures – Clavicle Fractures
3
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 FOREARM FRACTURES
• 1:100 kids each year • Mechanism usually FOOSH • Check for neurovascular compromise • Open vs. closed • Splint in position of comfort for transport • Imaging: AP, lateral forearm (includes elbow & wrist)
4
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 DISTAL RADIUS BUCKLE FRACTURES
• Pre-formed splint x 3 weeks • No follow up is necessary (West, 2005)
http://thesgem.com/2013/01/sgem19-bust-a-move; http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/health-med- fit/parents-children-prefer-splints-to-casts-and-research-shows-they/article_dee9a65d-0d955 -5021-b8f0- 56c9d695d08c.html © UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES
• Most common fracture in pediatrics (28-30%) • Metaphysis most frequent site • Most do well with closed reduction if needed • OR: open, unstable, displaced SH III or IV • Above elbow cast or GOOD below elbow cast x 4-6 weeks
http://backup.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4014/distal-radius-fractures--pediatric 6
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 BOTH BONE MID-SHAFT FOREARM FRACTURES
• Evaluate x-ray for: – Angulation – Displacement – Bayonet apposition or shortening – Rotational deformity • Make sure to image wrist and elbow
https://www.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4014/distal-radius-fractures--pediatric; 7
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE ALIGNMENT?
• More angulation tolerated near physis • Need ~ 2 years of growth remaining
8
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REDUCTION AND SPLINTING
• Sedation generally required in ED (e.g. ketamine, propofol, nitrous oxide) • Can consider hematoma block +/- versed • Bear et. al (J. Hand Surg Am. 2015) – 52 patients w/ distal radius fractures age 5-16y underwent reduction w/ either procedural sedation or hematoma block – Overall satisfaction and satisfaction w/ anesthesia similar with 2.2 hr reduction in ED length of stay for hematoma block group
9
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REDUCTION AND SPLINTING
• Periosteum can facilitate or complicate reduction • Physis: gentle pushing, minimize attempts to avoid damaging physis • Mid-shaft fractures: – 1st: Recreate deformity to unlock periosteum – 2nd: Apply longitudinal traction – 3rd: Correct rotational deformity – 4th: Reduce angulation
10
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REDUCTION AND SPLINTING
• Consider deforming forces on rotation – Proximal radius pulled into supination by biceps & supinator – Distal radius pulled into pronation by pronator quadratus & brachioradialis • Rule of Thumbs: rotate thumb towards apex of fracture
11
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REDUCTION AND SPLINTING
• Sugar tong splint – 3-point molding – Interosseous molding – 90º at elbow
12
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 INTEROSSEOUS MOLD
https://www.rch.org.au/fracture-education/management_principles/Management_Principles13 /
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 FOREARM FRACTURE FOLLOW-UP
• Total time in cast: ~ 6 weeks • Weekly x-rays x 2 • At 4 weeks consider moving from AE cast to BE cast • Straight ulnar border to avoid a “banana” cast
http://raisingsaints.blogspot.com/2012/04/surprising-it-took-this-long-really.html 14
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MONTEGGIA FRACTURES
• Proximal 1/3 ulnar fracture w/ radial head dislocation
https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/1024/monteggia-fractures 15
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 GALEAZZI FRACTURES
• Fracture of distal 1/3 radius with distal ulna dislocation
http://hatch.urbanskript.co/galeazzi-fracture/ 16
http://ha © UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 tch.urban skript.co ELBOW: OSSIFICATION CENTERS
17
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 ELBOW
• Anatomy: – Anterior humeral line intersects middle 1/3 of capitellum – Long axis of radius aligns w/ capitellum in all views – Anterior fat pad can be normal – Posterior fat pad never normal
18
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 ELBOW
• Anatomy: – Anterior humeral line intersects middle 1/3 of capitellum – Long axis of radius aligns w/ capitellum in all views – Anterior fat pad can be normal – Posterior fat pad never normal
19
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 ELBOW
• Anatomy: – Anterior humeral line intersects middle 1/3 of capitellum – Long axis of radius aligns w/ capitellum in all views – Anterior fat pad can be normal – Posterior fat pad never normal
20
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 NORMAL NOT NORMAL
By James Heilman, MD - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, 21 https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14633683
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES
• 95-98% extension type • Usually FOOSH • Most common age is 5-7 years • Associated injuries:
Radial Ulnar Anterior Nerve Nerve Interosseous Palsy Palsy Nerve Palsy
22
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE – TYPE I
• No or minimal displacement • No visible fracture line
23
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE – TYPE I
• Posterior splint w/ elbow at 90°flexion or less x 3-4 weeks • If you see a fat pad, treat it like a fracture
24
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE – TYPE II
• Obvious fracture line • Posterior cortex intact • Varying amounts of displacement • Closed reduction with ortho in OR (usually)
25
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE – TYPE II
• Place immediately in posterior splint with <20°flexion or where patient is comfortable
26
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE – TYPE III
• Completely displaced • No intact cortex • High risk of neurovascular complications • Place immediately in posterior splint with <20°flexion • Frequent pulse checks • Urgent reduction & pinning in OR with ortho
27
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES
• 5-10% of pediatric elbow fractures (Gottschalk, 2012) • Peak incidence: age 9-14 years • Last ossification center to fuse at age 15-20 y (Chessare, 1977) • Origin of flexor-pronator mass and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) • Mechanism: FOOSH w/ valgus stress to elbow, acute avulsion or overuse injury in throwing athletes
https://radiologykey.com/elbow-7/ 28
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES
• Up to 60% associated w/ elbow dislocation • 15-20% of elbow dislocations result in incarceration of medial epicondyle fragment (Gottschalk, 2012)
http://www.cmcedmasters.com/ortho-blog/pediatric-elbow-dislocation 29
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES
• Exam: – Pain/swelling over medial epicondyle – Consider testing stability with valgus stress • Imaging: – AP, lateral, consider internal obliques to determine anterior displacement – Degrees of displacement difficult to measure
30
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES TREATMENT
• Non-op: – < 5 mm displacement – Up to 4 weeks immobilization in AE cast flexed to 90º – Usually heals w/ fibrous union • Op: > 15 mm or joint entrapment • Controversial: 5-15 mm
31
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 MEDIAL EPICONDYLE FRACTURES TREATMENT
• Other indications for surgery (Gottschalk, 2012) – Gross elbow instability – Ulnar nerve damage – Overhead athletes or weight-bearing athletes (gymnasts) – Fragment in joint • Surgery had 92.5% bony union vs. 49.2% non-op group (Kamath, 2009)
32
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 LATERAL CONDYLE FRACTURES
• #2 pediatric elbow fracture • High risk of non-union, malunion, AVN • Mechanism: – Avulsion from common extensor complex – FOOSH • Internal oblique views helpful (fracture is posterolateral)
33
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 LATERAL CONDYLE FRACTURES TREATMENT
• Non-op if < 2 mm displacement in all views – AE cast 4-6 weeks, elbow at 90º – Weekly x-rays x 3 weeks • CRPP vs. ORIF
http://www.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4009/lateral-condyle-fracture-- 34 pediatric?expandLeftMenu=true
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES
• < 5% of pediatric fractures • Mechanism: – Blunt trauma – Indirect trauma – Overuse injury in throwers • Proximal humerus physis: 80% longitudinal growth in upper arm, so great remodeling potential • Imaging: AP, lateral, scapular Y or axillary views
35
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES: TREATMENT
• Acceptable alignment – < 10 y.o. = any angulation – 10-13 y.o = up to 60º angulation – > 13 y.o. = up to 45º angulation & 2/3 displacement • Immobilize: sling +/- swathe • Sometimes closed reduction attempted • Operative for unacceptable angulation or displacement, intra-articular fracture, NV injury, open fracture
http://backup.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4004/proximal-humerus-fracture--pediatric36
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 37
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 LITTLE LEAGUE SHOULDER
• Physis injury of proximal humerus • Repeated overhead throwing causes microtrauma • High loads of torque • May lead to acute SH I fracture • Rest & refer to PT for guided throwing program
38
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 LITTLE LEAGUE ELBOW
• SH I fracture medial epicondyle • Treatment is a period of rest followed by guided throwing program • Pitch counts in place to prevent Little League elbow & shoulder
vhttps://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/health/l/little-league-shoulde 39 http://orthokids.org/Sports-Injury-Prevention/Throwing-Injuriesr © UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 CLAVICLE FRACTURES
• 8-15% of pediatric fractures • Mechanism: – Direct blow to clavicle – FOOSH – Impact to lateral shoulder • Treatment for uncomplicated mid- shaft fractures: – Sling for comfort – ROM as pain as allows – No high risk activities x 2 months
https://eorif.com/pediatric-clavicle-fracture 40
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 CLAVICLE FRACTURES
• Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto (Adamich, 2016) – 339 skeletally immature patients with mid-shaft clavicle fractures – 2 had re-fractures – No non-unions – No follow up x-rays necessary – Majority can be discharged after initial assessment
41
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 CLAVICLE FRACTURES
• Surgical indications: – Tenting of skin – Open fracture – NV injury – Medial physeal injury
https://aneskey.com/chest-and-abdomen/ 42 https://www.orthobullets.com/pediatrics/4123/medial-clavicle-physeal-fractures © UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 QUESTIONS???
https://pulptastic.com/cast-designs/ 43
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REFERENCES
• Adamich J, Camp M, Howad A. Do all clavicle fractures in children need to be managed by orthoaedic surgones? Cjem 2016;18(S1):S79. • Beck J, Bowen R, Silva M. What’s New in Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures? J Pediatr Orthop 2016;0(0):1-5. • Calder JD, Solan M, Gidwani S, et al. Management of paediatric clavicle fractures—is follow-up necessary?An audit of 346 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:331–333. • Chessare JW, Rogers LF, White H, Tachdjian MO: Injuries of the medial epicondylar ossification center of the humerus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1977;129(1):49-55. • Gottschalk, HP et al. Medial Epicondyle Fractures in the Pediatric Population. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012;20(4):223-234.
44
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017 REFERENCES
• Klatt JB, Aoki SK. The location of the medial humeral epicondyle in children: position based on common radiographic landmarks. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:477–482. • Louahem DM, Bourelle S, Buscayret F, et al. Displaced medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus: surgical treatment and results. A report of 139 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:649–655. • Papavasiliou VA. Fracture-separation of the medial epicondylar epiphysis of the elbow joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;171: 172–174. • Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Fiacchi F, et al. Pediatric medial epicondyle fractures with intra-articular elbow incarceration. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16:117–123. • West S, Andrews J, Bebbington A, Ennis O, Alderman P. Buckle fractures of the distal radius are safely treated in a soft bandage: a randomized prospective trial of bandage versus plaster cast. J Pediatr Orthop Am 2005;25:322–325.
45
© UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH, 2017