The XMM-BCS Galaxy Cluster Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The XMM-BCS Galaxy Cluster Survey The XMM-BCS galaxy cluster survey Robert´ Suhadaˇ Munchen¨ 2011 The XMM-BCS galaxy cluster survey Robert´ Suhadaˇ Dissertation an der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Physik der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universitat¨ Munchen¨ vorgelegt von Robert´ Suhadaˇ aus Kosice,ˇ Slowakei Munchen,¨ den 25. Marz¨ 2011 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Hans Bohringer¨ Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Ortwin Gerhard Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 22. Juli 2011 Contents Zusammenfassung xiii Abstract xv 1 Introduction 1 2 Clusters of galaxies 3 2.1 Darkmattercontentofgalaxyclusters . ........ 7 2.2 Theintraclustermedium . ... 8 2.2.1 X-raypropertiesofclusters. .... 8 2.2.2 Spatial distribution of the cluster X-ray emission . ........... 10 2.2.3 CoolcoresandAGNfeedback . 12 2.2.4 X-rayscalingrelations . .. 14 2.2.5 Self-similarscalingrelations . ...... 15 2.2.6 The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect....................... 17 2.3 Thegalaxypopulationoftheclusters. ........ 21 2.3.1 Brightestclustergalaxies. .... 23 2.3.2 Theclusterredsequence . 24 2.3.3 Thegalaxyluminosityfunction . ... 25 2.3.4 Opticalclusterdetection . ... 25 2.4 Overviewofclusterreviewpapers . ...... 27 3 Tracing cosmic evolution with clusters of galaxies 29 3.1 StructureformationintheUniverse. ........ 29 3.1.1 Clustermassfunction. 30 3.2 Surveynumbercounts .............................. 32 3.3 Clusterpowerspectrum. ... 36 3.4 Othercosmologicaltestswithclusters . ......... 37 3.4.1 AngulardistanceHubblediagram . ... 37 3.4.2 Thegasmassfractioncosmologicaltest . ...... 39 vi CONTENTS 4 Analysis of the XMM-Newton survey data 41 4.1 Overviewof the XMM-Newton mission ...................... 41 4.2 ElementsofX-rayanalysis . .... 42 4.2.1 X-raymirrors................................ 43 4.2.2 Pointspreadfunction. 45 4.2.3 Effectivearea................................ 47 4.2.4 CCDdetectors ............................... 48 4.2.5 X-rayimaging ............................... 48 4.3 Mosaicmodeobservations . ... 50 4.3.1 Overheadsinstandardobservations . ..... 50 4.3.2 Thestructureofamosaicmodeobservation . ...... 52 4.4 Analysingmosaicmodeobservations. ....... 53 4.4.1 Singlepiecemosaichandling. ... 54 4.4.2 Splittingmosaicintoindividualpointings . ......... 57 5 The XMM-BCS galaxy cluster survey 59 5.1 Introduction.................................... 60 5.2 XMM-Newton datareduction............................ 62 5.3 Sourcedetection................................. .. 66 5.3.1 Sourcelistgeneration. .. 67 5.3.2 Growthcurveanalysis . 70 5.3.3 Physicalparameterestimation . .... 73 5.4 Photometricredshiftestimation. ........ 75 5.4.1 Spectroscopicredshifts . ... 76 5.5 Results........................................ 77 5.5.1 Galaxyclustersample . 77 5.5.2 Surveysky-coverage . 78 5.5.3 Cluster log N log S ............................ 82 − 5.5.4 Comparison of spectroscopic and photometric redshifts.......... 84 5.5.5 Cross-correlationwithknownsources . ...... 85 5.5.6 Cross-correlation with the Southern Cosmology Surveyclusters . 86 5.6 Discussion...................................... 91 5.6.1 ErrorbudgetoftheX-rayanalysis . .... 92 5.6.2 Projectoutlook ............................... 95 5.7 Conclusions..................................... 96 5.8 Appendix ...................................... 99 5.8.1 Qualityflagsandancillaryinformation . ...... 99 5.8.2 Notesonindividualsources . 103 5.8.3 Test of sensitivity function from preliminary Monte Carlo simulations . 106 5.8.4 ComparisonwiththeXMM-LSSsurvey . 107 CONTENTS vii 6 XMM-Newton detection of two clusters with strong SPT SZE signals 113 6.1 Introduction.................................... 113 6.2 XMM-Newtondatareduction. 114 6.2.1 XMM-Newtonmosaicmodeobservations . 115 6.2.2 X-raydataanalysis ............................. 116 6.3 Discussionandconclusions. .119 6.4 Appendix ......................................120 7 Exploring the galaxy cluster-group transition regime at high redshifts 123 7.1 Introduction.................................... 124 7.2 Observationsanddataanalysis . .. ..126 7.2.1 Initial X-ray detection with XMM-Newton ................126 7.2.2 Optical/Near-infraredobservations. 127 7.2.3 GrowthcurveanalysisoftheX-rayimagingdata . .......136 7.3 Resultsanddiscussion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 138 7.3.1 Physicalpropertiesoftheclusters . .. ..138 7.3.2 The nature of the X-ray emission of XMMU J1532.2-0836 . .......140 7.3.3 Thegalaxypopulationoftheclusters . .142 7.3.4 Cross-correlationwithknownsources . .. ..143 7.4 Conclusions..................................... 143 7.5 Appendix ......................................145 7.5.1 XMMUJ0302.1-0000 . .145 7.5.2 High redshift cluster detections in the past decade . ...........150 8 Summary and outlook 153 8.1 Conclusions of the analysis of two z > 1systems .................153 8.2 SummaryoftheX-rayoftheXMM-BCSsurvey. .154 8.3 OutlooksfortheXMM-BCSsurvey . 155 Bibliography 159 Acknowledgements 187 Curriculum Vitae 188 viii CONTENTS List of Figures 2.1 Growthofentropy................................. 4 2.2 Thelarge-scalestructureoftheUniverse . .......... 4 2.3 TheBulletCluster................................ .. 6 2.4 ClusterX-rayspectra . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 9 2.5 AGNfeedbackinclustercores . .... 13 2.6 The inverse Compton scattering kernel and the SZE spectrum........... 19 2.7 SZEandX-raycomparisonofthreeclusters . ........ 21 2.8 Abell2218andtheCMDofXMMUJ2235-2557 . ... 22 2.9 Schechtergalaxyluminosityfunction . ........ 26 3.1 Comparisonofmassfunctions . .... 33 3.2 MassfunctionintheMilleniumRunsimulation . ......... 34 3.3 Cosmological constraints from cluster number counts . ............. 35 3.4 TheREFLEXIIpowerspectrum . .. 36 3.5 Angular distance Hubble diagram and fgas test................... 38 4.1 XMM-Newton and its effectivearea ........................ 43 4.2 Wolter type 1 mirror design of XMM-Newton ................... 44 4.3 XMM-Newton PSFgallery ............................. 46 4.4 Azimuthally averaged PSF and vignetting function of XMM-Newton ....... 47 4.5 Mosaic mode observation efficiency ........................ 50 4.6 XMM-BCSmosaicexposuremaps. .. 56 5.1 TheXMM-BCSmosaic............................... 63 5.2 Pipelineproducts ................................ .. 66 5.3 Hotchiptreatment ................................ 69 5.4 GrowthcurveofclusterID018. .... 71 5.5 OpticalimageofclusterID018. ..... 76 5.6 BCScolorimagesoftwohigh-zsystems. ...... 77 5.7 Redshift, mass and temperature distributions of the clustersample . 79 5.8 Detection likelihoods and X-ray luminosities of the sample............ 80 5.9 Thesurveyskycoverage .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 81 5.10 The log N log S relation ............................. 83 − x List of Figures 5.11 Comparison of spectrometric and photometric redshifts.............. 84 5.12 Comparison of cluster parameters with the SCS sample . ............ 89 5.13 ComparisonofX-rayandweaklensingmasses . ........ 91 5.14 Fluxsensitivityonphoto-zuncertainty . ........... 93 5.15 Skycoveragecomparisonwithsimulations. ..........107 5.16 Comparison of detection parameters with the XMM-LSS survey .. .. ..110 5.17 FluxcomparisonwiththeXMM-LSSsurvey. .......110 5.18 CoreradiicomparisonwiththeXMM-LSSsurvey . .........111 6.1 X-ray images of SPT-CL J2332-5358 and SPT-CL J2342-5411 ..........115 6.2 The growth curves of SPT-CL J2332-5358 and SPT-CL J2342-5411 . .120 6.3 The X-ray spectra of SPT-CL J2332-5358 and SPT-CL J2342-5411. .121 6.4 Optical color images of SPT-CL J2332-5358 and SPT-CL J2342-5411 . 122 7.1 Optical/NIR images of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 . 131 7.2 Color-magnitude diagrams of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 . 134 7.3 Optical spectroscopy of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 . 135 7.4 Growth curves of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 .......136 7.5 Optical/NIRimageofXMMUJ0302.1-0000. 146 7.6 Color-magnitudediagramofXMMUJ0302.1-0000 . ........147 7.7 X-ray image of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J0302.1-0000 . ........149 7.8 GrowthcurveofXMMUJ0302.1-0000 . 149 7.9 Distantclusterdiscoveriesinthepastdecade . ............151 List of Tables 2.1 Galaxyclusterfactsheet . .... 5 4.1 XMM-Newton PSFparameters........................... 47 5.1 XMM-Newton observationlog ........................... 65 5.2 Spectroscopicredshifts . ..... 78 5.3 Cross-matchedradiosources . ..... 86 5.4 ComparisonwiththeSCSsample . ... 88 5.5 X-rayupperlimitsfortheSCSnon-detections . .......... 92 5.6 Physicalparametersoftheclusterssample . .......... 98 5.7 AncillaryX-rayqualityflags . .102 5.8 Cross-matchedgalaxies. .104 5.9 Physical parameters for the low quality detections . .............105 6.1 Basic X-ray parameters of SPT-CL J2332-5358 and SPT-CL J2342-5411. 118 7.1 X-ray coverage of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 .......126 7.2 Optical/NIR observations of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836. 130 7.3 Spectroscopic members of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836. 132 7.4 Basic X-ray parameters of XMMU J0302.2-0001 and XMMU J1532.2-0836 . 137 7.5 BasicX-rayparametersofXMMUJ0302.1-0000 . .......148 xii List of Tables Zusammenfassung Wir erleben eine einzigartige Epoche in der Geschichte der Erforschung von Galaxienhaufen. Wir haben nun Fenster zum Universum ¨uber das gesamte elektromagnetische Spektrum, die uns sich erg¨anzende Ans¨atze f¨ur die Erkennung und Studien von Galaxienhaufen bieten. Fast vierzig Jahre nach der theoretischen Voraussage haben die ersten großen Radioteleskope begonnen den Himmel, auf der Suche nach massereichen Haufen zu untersuchen, die durch den Sunyaev- Zel’dovich Effekt (SZE) mit ihrem heißen Gas auf dem kosmischen Mikrowellen-Hintergrund
Recommended publications
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics a Hipparcos Study of the Hyades
    A&A 367, 111–147 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000410 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics A Hipparcos study of the Hyades open cluster Improved colour-absolute magnitude and Hertzsprung{Russell diagrams J. H. J. de Bruijne, R. Hoogerwerf, and P. T. de Zeeuw Sterrewacht Leiden, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 13 June 2000 / Accepted 24 November 2000 Abstract. Hipparcos parallaxes fix distances to individual stars in the Hyades cluster with an accuracy of ∼6per- cent. We use the Hipparcos proper motions, which have a larger relative precision than the trigonometric paral- laxes, to derive ∼3 times more precise distance estimates, by assuming that all members share the same space motion. An investigation of the available kinematic data confirms that the Hyades velocity field does not contain significant structure in the form of rotation and/or shear, but is fully consistent with a common space motion plus a (one-dimensional) internal velocity dispersion of ∼0.30 km s−1. The improved parallaxes as a set are statistically consistent with the Hipparcos parallaxes. The maximum expected systematic error in the proper motion-based parallaxes for stars in the outer regions of the cluster (i.e., beyond ∼2 tidal radii ∼20 pc) is ∼<0.30 mas. The new parallaxes confirm that the Hipparcos measurements are correlated on small angular scales, consistent with the limits specified in the Hipparcos Catalogue, though with significantly smaller “amplitudes” than claimed by Narayanan & Gould. We use the Tycho–2 long time-baseline astrometric catalogue to derive a set of independent proper motion-based parallaxes for the Hipparcos members.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumba, Salsa, Smaba and Tango in the Magnetosphere
    ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 2 r bulletin 107 — august 2001 42 ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 3 the cluster quartet’s first year in space Rumba, Salsa, Samba and Tango in the Magnetosphere - The Cluster Quartet’s First Year in Space C.P. Escoubet & M. Fehringer Solar System Division, Space Science Department, ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, Noordwijk, The Netherlands P. Bond Cranleigh, Surrey, United Kingdom Introduction Launch and commissioning phase Cluster is one of the two missions – the other When the first Soyuz blasted off from the being the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory Baikonur Cosmodrome on 16 July 2000, we (SOHO) – constituting the Solar Terrestrial knew that Cluster was well on the way to Science Programme (STSP), the first recovery from the previous launch setback. ‘Cornerstone’ of ESA’s Horizon 2000 However, it was not until the second launch on Programme. The Cluster mission was first 9 August 2000 and the proper injection of the proposed in November 1982 in response to an second pair of spacecraft into orbit that we ESA Call for Proposals for the next series of knew that the Cluster mission was truly back scientific missions. on track (Fig. 1). In fact, the experimenters said that they knew they had an ideal mission only The four Cluster spacecraft were successfully launched in pairs by after switching on their last instruments on the two Russian Soyuz rockets on 16 July and 9 August 2000. On 14 fourth spacecraft. August, the second pair joined the first pair in highly eccentric polar orbits, with an apogee of 19.6 Earth radii and a perigee of 4 Earth radii.
    [Show full text]
  • Ariane 501 Incident at Three Levels of Description
    Launch Failures! December 1, 1994! Ariane 501 Incident " Ariane 4 ! 70th flight! at Three Levels of Description! February 19, 1996! Long March 3B ! 1st flight! 501 Report Dates! 501 Launch Events! June 4, 1996! 0 seconds! Ariane 501 ! June 4-6, 1996! H0 - main cryogenic ! 1st flight! Initial reports of the ! engine ignition! incident! 7 seconds! August 12, 1998! Liftoff! Titan 4A ! 36.7 seconds! Backup inertial reference ! 20th flight! June 6 - July 19, 1996! system inoperative due to ! Intermediate reports! numerical overflow in ! August 26, 1998! horizontal velocity! Delta 3 ! 37.2 seconds! Primary inertial reference ! 1st flight ! July 19, 1996! system inoperative due to ! Inquiry Board Report! numerical overflow in ! horizontal velocity! Time! (months)! 37-38 seconds! July 20-26, 1996! Booster and main engine ! Reports based on ! nozzles swivel, rocket veers ! off course and breaks up ! inquiry findings! from aerodynamic loads ! July 27 - September, 1996! 39 seconds! Automatic self-destruct ! Comprehensive reports ! 45 seconds! Time! Time! Range safety officer destruct ! (days)! (secs.)! “High Profit” Documents! Ariane 5 Flight 501 Failure: Report by the Inquiry Board (July 19, 1996)! Inertial Reference Software Error Blamed for Ariane 5 Failure; Defense !Daily (July 24, 1996) ! !!! Software Design Flaw Destroyed Ariane 5; next flight in 1997; ! !Aerospace Daily (July 24, 1996) ! !! Ariane 5 Rocket Faces More Delay; The Financial Times Limited ! !(July 24, 1996) ! Flying Blind: Inadequate Testing led to the Software Breakdown that !Doomed Ariane
    [Show full text]
  • European Space Agency Announces Contest to Name the Cluster Quartet
    European Space Agency Announces Contest to Name the Cluster Quartet. 1. Contest rules The European Space Agency (ESA) is launching a public competition to find the most suitable names for its four Cluster II space weather satellites. The quartet, which are currently known as flight models 5, 6, 7 and 8, are scheduled for launch from Baikonur Space Centre in Kazakhstan in June and July 2000. Professor Roger Bonnet, ESA Director of Science Programme, announced the competition for the first time to the European Delegations on the occasion of the Science Programme Committee (SPC) meeting held in Paris on 21-22 February 2000. The competition is open to people of all the ESA member states. Each entry should include a set of FOUR names (places, people, or things from his- tory, mythology, or fiction, but NOT living persons). Contestants should also describe in a few sentences why their chosen names would be appropriate for the four Cluster II satellites. The winners will be those which are considered most suitable and relevant for the Cluster II mission. The names must not have been used before on space missions by ESA, other space organizations or individual countries. One winning entry per country will be selected to go to the Finals of the competition. The prize for each national winner will be an invitation to attend the first Cluster II launch event in mid-June 2000 with their family (4 persons) in a 3-day trip (including excursions to tourist sites) to one of these ESA establishments: ESRIN (near Rome, Italy): winners from France, Ireland, United King- dom, Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Ref: SCI-S-2019-001-CPE AO for Cluster Issue 1.0 Guest Investigator and Early Career Date 25 February 2019 Scientist Programme Page 1
    Cluster Ref: SCI-S-2019-001-CPE AO for Cluster Issue 1.0 Guest Investigator and Early Career Date 25 February 2019 Scientist Programme Page 1 European Space Agency Directorate of Science Cluster ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY for Guest Investigator and Early Career Scientist February 2019 Cluster Ref: SCI-S-2019-001-CPE AO for Cluster Issue 1.0 Guest Investigator and Early Career Date 25 February 2019 Scientist Programme Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Guest Investigator and Early Career Scientist Programme ..................................4 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................4 1.2 Scope ..........................................................................................................4 1.3 Proposal Information Package .....................................................................4 1.4 Eligibility....................................................................................................5 1.5 Privileges and Responsibilities of the selected Guest Investigator ...............5 1.6 Privileges and Responsibilities of the selected Early Career Scientist ..........5 1.7 Timetable....................................................................................................6 1.8 Letters of Intent ..........................................................................................6 1.9 Proposals ....................................................................................................6 1.9.1 Cover page ..........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers
    Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers by Babak E. Cohanim B.S., Iowa State University (2002) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in Aeronautics & Astronautics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2013 © 2013 Babak E. Cohanim. All rights reserved Signature of Author......................................................................................... Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Chairman: Jeffrey A. Hoffman Professor of the Practice, Aeronautics & Astronautics Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: Olivier L. de Weck Associate Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics and Engineering Systems Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: David W. Miller Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: Tye M. Brady Space Systems Group Leader, Draper Laboratory Accepted by.................................................................................................... Aeronautics & Astronautics Graduate Chairman: Eytan H. Modiano Professor, Aeronautics
    [Show full text]
  • We Live Inside an Invisible Magnetosphere That Protects Life from Dangerous Solar Particle Radiation
    We live inside an invisible magnetosphere that protects life from dangerous solar particle radiation UK experiments on the 4 spacecraft Cluster mission investigate the magnetosphere We are using Cluster to explore what makes the aurora borealis (the northern lights) We live inside an invisible magnetosphere that protects life from dangerous solar particle radiation magnetopause bow shock cusp moon magnetotail cusp solar wind A coronal mass ejection (CME). In this image, a disk The Earth’s magnetosphere. The magnetopause is the edge of the magnetosphere. In front of the magnetosphere is a bow held by an arm in front of the camera creates an artifi- shock, where the supersonic solar wind is deflected around the sides. The magnetotail forms on the side facing away from cial eclipse. The Sun is shown as a white circle. The CME the Sun. The cusps are regions near the magnetic poles where the magnetosphere is particularly ‘leaky’. The Moon is is traveling out from the Sun to the right. (Image credit: also shown for context, at a time when it is in the magnetotail. The magnetosphere contains a variety of different plasmas SoHO/LASCO consortium/ESA/NASA) such as the plasmasphere (blue, low energy), the plasma sheet (green), the ring current (yellow) and the radiation belts (orange and red, high energy). The Earth’s magnetic field extends into space and forms a protective bubble called the magnetosphere. Acting like a shield, it deflects the solar wind - a constant flow of material from the Sun - around the Earth. The magnetosphere is largely invisible, and so it must be measured locally by satellites that ‘touch’, ‘taste’ and ‘hear’ the magnetosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Success
    MISSION TO SUCCESS CORPORATE BROCHURE Arianespace Rapport annuel 2014 03 CONTENTS 2015 KEY FIGURES 05 INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO SPACE 07 THE GLOBAL LEADER 09 AN ECO-RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE CITIZEN 11 ARIANE 5, THE HEAVY LAUNCHER 13 SOYUZ, THE MEDIUM LAUNCHER 15 VEGA, THE LIGHT LAUNCHER 17 BUILDING SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE 18 © Published in February 2016 by Arianespace – Graphic Design by Agence Micro-mega – Photos : ESA, CNES, Arianespace, Service Optique du CSG, Stéphane Corvaja, David Ducros, L Boyer, JM Guillon. www.arianespace.com Arianespace Rapport annuel 2014 05 2015 KEY FIGURES Record sales and backlog € 1.4 BILLION € 5.3 BILLION 330 Revenues (accurate figure to Backlog of orders Number of employees be released once operating (on December 31, 2015) (on December 31, 2015) accounts are approved by the Board of Directors) 12 21 53 Launches Satellites orbited Metric tons injected into and successes geostationary transfer (a record for the orbit by 6 Ariane 5 three-launcher family) (a record since Arianespace’s creation) 2015 launches Science & Space Exploration Navigation Telecommunications Telecommunications 11 FEBRUARY 27 MARCH 26 APRIL 27 MAY Vega Soyuz ST B - CSG Ariane 5 ECA Ariane 5 ECA Intermediate Two Galileo SICRAL 2 DirecTV-15 eXperimental Vehicle FOC satellites THOR 7 SKY México-1 (IXV) Earth Observation Meteorology Telecommunications Navigation 22 JUNE 15 JULY 20 AUGUST 21 SEPTEMBER Vega Ariane 5 ECA Ariane 5 ECA Soyuz ST B - CSG Sentinel-2A MSG-4 EUTELSAT 8 West B Two Galileo Star One C4 Intelsat 34 FOC satellites Telecommunications Telecommunications Science & Space Exploration Navigation 30 SEPTEMBER 10 NOVEMBER 2 DECEMBER 17 DECEMBER Ariane 5 ECA Ariane 5 ECA Vega Soyuz ST B - CSG ARSAT-2 Arabsat-6B LISA Pathfinder Two Galileo Sky Muster GSAT-15 FOC satellites Arianespace Rapport annuel 2014 07 INDEPENDENT ACCESS TO SPACE Since being founded in 1980, Arianespace has offered access to space for both government and commercial customers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terrestrial Radiation Belts As Seen by Bepicolombo During Its Flyby to Earth
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 15, EPSC2021-200, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2021-200 Europlanet Science Congress 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The terrestrial radiation belts as seen by BepiColombo during its flyby to Earth Beatriz Sanchez-Cano1, Rami Vainio2, Marco Pinto3, Philipp Oleynik2, Rumi Nakamura4, Richard Moissl5, Yoshizumi Miyoshi6, Arlindo Marques7, Arto Lehtolainen8, Seppo Korpela8, Emilia Kilpua8, Rosie Johnson9, Juhani Huovelin8, Daniel Heyner10, Wojtek Hajdas11, Manuel Grande9, Patricia Gonçalves3,12, Eero Esko8, and Iannis Dandouras13 1University of Leicester, School of Physics and Astronomy, Leicester, United Kingdom ([email protected]) 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Finland 3Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Lisbon, Portugal 4Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria 5European Space Research and Technology Centre, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, Netherlands 6ISEE, Nagoya University, Japan 7EFACEC, SA, Oporto, Portugal 8Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland 9Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, UK 10Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany 11Paul Scherrer Institut, Laboratory For Particle Physics, PSI-Villigen, Switzerland 12Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal 13Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Toulouse, France BepiColombo is a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to the planet Mercury, that was launched in October 2018 and it is due to arrive at Mercury in late 2025. It consists of two spacecraft, the Mercury Planetary Orbiter (MPO) built by ESA, and the Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter (MMO) built by JAXA, as well as a Mercury Transfer Module (MTM) for propulsion built by ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIANE Dépliant Techn GB 1/12/99 17:39 Page 3
    ARIANE dépliant techn GB 1/12/99 17:39 Page 1 Europe Head office Boulevard de l’Europe B.P.177 - 91006 Evry Cedex - France Tel:+ 33 1 60 87 60 00 Arianespace 1999. Fax: + 33 1 60 87 62 47 vitz - Photos: F. Buxin, B. Paris, USA Subsidiary ARIANESPACE Inc. 601 13th Street - N.W. Suite 710 North Washington D.C. 20005 Tel:+ 1 202 628-3936 Fax: + 1 202 628-3949 TECHNICAL INFORMATION French Guiana Facilities ARIANESPACE Kourou B.P.809 97388 Kourou Cedex Tel:+ 594 33 67 07 Fax: + 594 33 69 13 Singapore Liaison office ARIANESPACE ASEAN Office Shenton House # 25-06 3 Shenton Way Singapour 068805 Tél : + 65 223 64 26 Fax : + 65 223 42 68 Japan Liaison office ARIANESPACE Tokyo Kasumigaseki Building, 31Fl. 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6031 Tél : + 81 3 3592-2766 Fax : + 81 3 3592-2768 Publication:Arianespace International Affairs and Corporate Communications - Design and printing: ByTheWay - Adaptation: - Design and printing:Affairs and Corporate Communications Publication:Arianespace - J. International ByTheWay Lenoro D. Matra Lanceurs, Parker,Aerospatiale ESA, Space, Matra Marconi Service Optique CSG, Snecma, X - Illustrations: D. Ducros, Medialogie. © www.arianespace.com ARIANE dépliant techn GB 1/12/99 17:39 Page 3 The reference for new generation heavy-lift launchers Arianespace is the world's com- mercial space transportation leader, earning this position through the management, marketing and operation of Europe's reliable Ariane 1-4 launcher series. To meet tomorrow's market requirements, Arianespace is introducing the Ariane 5 heavy- lift launcher. This capable new vehicle is perfectly tailored to the increasingly diversified demand for service - including heavier and larger satellites, a wider range of orbits and combined missions.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Cluster-II
    programmes & operations ISO Some of the closest and best-studied star luminous and the bright regions are dark. factories in our Galaxy sprawl across the By penetrating the dust, ISO reveals Operations of ISO continue to go very Orion and Taurus constellations. Without dense regions inside the obscuring clouds smoothly, with all satellite and ground- the extension of its life, ISO could never where new stars are forming. segment systems continuing to perform have looked safely in that direction in the excellently. On 11 December, a third sky as the cold telescope must always station-keeping manoeuvre was remain averted from the intense infrared Cluster-II successfully carried out with performance glow of both the Earth and the Sun. The matching plans to within 0.27%. On the first chance to look at these areas came The contract with the Prime Contractor same day, the third direct measurement in August-September and, despite the Dornier has been successfully negotiated of the amount of liquid helium remaining necessary operational restrictions and agreed by both parties. The on-board was made. The results were described above, many scientific procurement of all spacecraft and consistent with the earlier measurements, observations were performed. With its payload equipment has been initiated, with indications that the lifetime will be at lifetime currently predicted to last until consistent with the delivery of four Cluster the upper end of the predicted range of April 1998, ISO will even have a second spacecraft for launch in mid-2000. For 10 April 1998 ± 2.5 weeks. chance to observe these exciting regions most equipment, this involves a rebuilding in the Spring.
    [Show full text]