DOCSLIB.ORG

Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers by Babak E. Cohanim B.S., Iowa State University (2002) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004) Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in Aeronautics & Astronautics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2013 © 2013 Babak E. Cohanim. All rights reserved Signature of Author......................................................................................... Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Chairman: Jeffrey A. Hoffman Professor of the Practice, Aeronautics & Astronautics Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: Olivier L. de Weck Associate Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics and Engineering Systems Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: David W. Miller Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics Certified by..................................................................................................... Thesis Committee Member: Tye M. Brady Space Systems Group Leader, Draper Laboratory Accepted by.................................................................................................... Aeronautics & Astronautics Graduate Chairman: Eytan H. Modiano Professor, Aeronautics & Astronautics 1 2 Mission Design for Safe Traverse of Planetary Hoppers by Babak E. Cohanim Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics on May 2013 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in Aeronautics & Astronautics ABSTRACT Planetary hoppers are a new class of vehicle being developed that will provide planetary surface mobility by reusing the landing platform and its actuators to propulsively ascend, translate, and descend to new landing points on the surface of a planetary body. Hoppers enhance regional exploration, with the capability of rapid traverse over hundreds to thousands of meters, traverse over hazardous terrain, and exploration of cliffs and craters. These planetary mobility vehicles are fuel limited and as a result are enabled by carrying sensor payloads that require low mass, low volume, and low onboard computational resources. This thesis describes methods for hoppers to traverse and land safely in this constrained environment. The key questions of this research are: - What types of missions will hoppers perform and how does a hopper traverse as part of these missions? - How does a hopper traverse from its current location to a new landing site safely? This thesis: - describes various hopper mission scenarios and considerations for their mission designs - creates an operational concept for safe landing for the traverse hop mission scenario - develops a method that can be used to rapidly and safely detect landing areas at long ranges and low path angles - develops a method to do fine detection of hazards once at the landing area Thesis Supervisor: Jeffrey A. Hoffman Title: Professor of the Practice of Aerospace Engineering Keywords: hopper, hopping, planetary hopper, planetary hopping, lunar hopper, propulsive hopper, planetary mobility, Talaris hopper, hazard detection, hazard detection and avoidance, optical hazard detection, LIDAR, size density method, sparse slope and roughness 3 Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Mathematical Symbols ................................................................................................................................. 9 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 15 1.3 Thesis Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Thesis Overview .......................................................................................................................... 19 2 Current Methods for Landing and Traverse ........................................................................................ 20 2.1 Hoppers as an Extension of Landers ........................................................................................... 20 2.2 Techniques leveraged from Landers and Rovers ........................................................................ 23 3 Hopper Mission Scenarios................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Traverse Hop Scenarios ............................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Steep Slope Exploration .............................................................................................................. 35 3.3 Crater Exploration ....................................................................................................................... 36 3.4 Chapter 3 Summary .................................................................................................................... 38 4 Landing Area Selection ........................................................................................................................ 39 4.1 Landing Area Selection Operational Concept for Traversing Spacecraft .................................... 40 4.2 Size Density Method ................................................................................................................... 43 4.3 Size Density Method Algorithm Description ............................................................................... 45 4.4 Size Density Method Simulations and Results ............................................................................ 56 4.5 Chapter 4 Summary .................................................................................................................... 87 5 Landing Aim Point Selection ............................................................................................................... 89 5.1 Sparse Slope & Roughness Operational Concept ....................................................................... 90 5.2 Sparse Slope & Roughness Detection Method Description ........................................................ 93 5.3 Simulation Environment ............................................................................................................. 96 5.4 Performance and Timing Analysis ............................................................................................. 102 5.5 Combined SDM and SSR Analysis .............................................................................................. 104 5.6 Chapter 5 Summary .................................................................................................................. 109 6 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 111 6.1 Summary of Contributions ........................................................................................................ 111 6.2 Future Work .............................................................................................................................. 112 4 6.3 Final Remarks ............................................................................................................................ 114 6.4 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 115 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................. 116 Appendix A – Surface Image Rendering .................................................................................................... 126 Tables in Thesis Table 1 – Comparison of Planetary Exploration Systems ........................................................................... 12 Table 2 – Navigation and Hazard Detection Architectures Past and Current ............................................. 24 Table 3 – Sensors to Measurements ........................................................................................................... 27 Table 4 – Relative Statistically Safety for Landing Area Selection .............................................................. 40 Table 5 – Cost Comparison for SDM vs. MDM ............................................................................................ 71 Table 6 – Timing analysis between DEM-based and Size Density Methods ............................................... 73 Table 7 – View and Sun Angle Tradespace ................................................................................................. 75 Table 8 – Laser Range Sensors ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    l 122 EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL ASPECTS OPEN FILE REPORT 92-2 EARTHQUAKES AND Ludwin, R. S.; Malone, S. D.; Crosson, R. EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Washington SEISMOLOGY - 1946 EVENT ASPECTS eanhquak:es, 1985. Clague, J. J., 1989, Research on eanh- Ludwin, R. S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Reeval­ Perkins, J. B.; Moy, Kenneth, 1989, Llabil­ quak:e-induced ground failures in south­ uation of the 19th century Washington ity of local government for earthquake western British Columbia [abstract). and Oregon eanhquake catalog using hazards and losses-A guide to the law Evans, S. G., 1989, The 1946 Mount Colo­ original accounts-The moderate sized and its impacts in the States of Califor­ nel Foster rock avalanches and auoci­ earthquake of May l, 1882 [abstract). nia, Alaska, Utah, and Washington; ated displacement wave, Vancouver Is­ Final repon. Maley, Richard, 1986, Strong motion accel­ land, British Columbia. erograph stations in Oregon and Wash­ Hasegawa, H. S.; Rogers, G. C., 1978, EARTHQUAKES AND ington (April 1986). Appendix C Quantification of the magnitude 7.3, SEISMOLOGY - NETWORKS Malone, S. D., 1991, The HAWK seismic British Columbia earthquake of June 23, AND CATALOGS data acquisition and analysis system 1946. [abstract). Berg, J. W., Jr.; Baker, C. D., 1963, Oregon Hodgson, E. A., 1946, British Columbia eanhquak:es, 1841 through 1958 [ab­ Milne, W. G., 1953, Seismological investi­ earthquake, June 23, 1946. gations in British Columbia (abstract). stract). Hodgson, J. H.; Milne, W. G., 1951, Direc­ Chan, W.W., 1988, Network and array anal­ Munro, P. S.; Halliday, R. J.; Shannon, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5.4.3: Risk Assessment – Flood
    SECTION 5.4.3: RISK ASSESSMENT – FLOOD 5.4.3 FLOOD This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment for the flood hazard. HAZARD PROFILE This section provides hazard profile information including description, extent, location, previous occurrences and losses and the probability of future occurrences. Description Floods are one of the most common natural hazards in the U.S. They can develop slowly over a period of days or develop quickly, with disastrous effects that can be local (impacting a neighborhood or community) or regional (affecting entire river basins, coastlines and multiple counties or states) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2006). Most communities in the U.S. have experienced some kind of flooding, after spring rains, heavy thunderstorms, coastal storms, or winter snow thaws (George Washington University, 2001). Floods are the most frequent and costly natural hazards in New York State in terms of human hardship and economic loss, particularly to communities that lie within flood prone areas or flood plains of a major water source. The FEMA definition for flooding is “a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally dry land area or of two or more properties from the overflow of inland or tidal waters or the rapid accumulation of runoff of surface waters from any source (FEMA, Date Unknown).” The New York State Disaster Preparedness Commission (NYSDPC) and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) indicates that flooding could originate from one
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Onboard Science Data Analysis for Comet Missions
    AUTONOMOUS ONBOARD SCIENCE DATA ANALYSIS FOR COMET MISSIONS David R. Thompson(1), Daniel Q. Tran(1), David McLaren(1), Steve A. Chien(1), Larry Bergman(1), Rebecca Castaño(1), Richard Doyle(1), Tara Estlin(1), Matthew Lenda(1), (1) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA 91109, USA Email: [email protected], all others [email protected] Figure 1. Plume detection by identifying the nucleus. Left: computational edge detection. Center: a convex hull of edge points. Right: bright areas outside the nucleus are plumes. Image credit: NASA/JPL/UMD. ABSTRACT active geologic processes including scarps and outflows [1]. Its surface undergoes continuous modification, Coming years will bring several comet rendezvous with visible change during the years between two missions. The Rosetta spacecraft arrives at Comet flybys. The EPOXI flyby of comet Hartley 2 shows 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko in 2014. Subsequent skyscraper-size spires, flat featureless plains that outgas rendezvous might include a mission such as the H O, regions of rough and mottled texture, bands of proposed Comet Hopper with multiple surface landings, 2 various shapes, and diverse surface albedo. Comets’ as well as Comet Nucleus Sample Return (CNSR) and active areas range from 10-90%, changing over time Coma Rendezvous and Sample Return (CRSR). These and distance to the sun. They manifest as both localized encounters will begin to shed light on a population that, jets and diffuse regions (Figure 1). Still more exotic, despite several previous flybys, remains mysterious and recently discovered “active asteroids” suggest that poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • How Doc Draper Became the Father of Inertial Guidance
    (Preprint) AAS 18-121 HOW DOC DRAPER BECAME THE FATHER OF INERTIAL GUIDANCE Philip D. Hattis* With Missouri roots, a Stanford Psychology degree, and a variety of MIT de- grees, Charles Stark “Doc” Draper formulated the basis for reliable and accurate gyro-based sensing technology that enabled the first and many subsequent iner- tial navigation systems. Working with colleagues and students, he created an Instrumentation Laboratory that developed bombsights that changed the balance of World War II in the Pacific. His engineering teams then went on to develop ever smaller and more accurate inertial navigation for aircraft, submarines, stra- tegic missiles, and spaceflight. The resulting inertial navigation systems enable national security, took humans to the Moon, and continue to find new applica- tions. This paper discusses the history of Draper’s path to becoming known as the “Father of Inertial Guidance.” FROM DRAPER’S MISSOURI ROOTS TO MIT ENGINEERING Charles Stark Draper was born in 1901 in Windsor Missouri. His father was a dentist and his mother (nee Stark) was a school teacher. The Stark family developed the Stark apple that was popular in the Midwest and raised the family to prominence1 including a cousin, Lloyd Stark, who became governor of Missouri in 1937. Draper was known to his family and friends as Stark (Figure 1), and later in life was known by colleagues as Doc. During his teenage years, Draper enjoyed tinkering with automobiles. He also worked as an electric linesman (Figure 2), and at age 15 began a liberal arts education at the University of Mis- souri in Rolla.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Science Operations David R
    Agile Science Operations David R. Thompson Machine Learning and Instrument Autonomy Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Engineering Resilient Space Systems Keck Institute Study, July 31 2012. A portion of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Copyright 2012 California Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved; U. S. Government Support Acknowledged. Image: Hartley 2 (EPOXI), NASA/JPL/UMD Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 1 Agenda Motivation: science at primitive bodies Critical Path Analysis and reaction time A survey of onboard science data analysis Case study – how could onboard data analysis impact missions? Image: Hartley 2 (EPOXI), NASA/JPL/UMD Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 2 Primitive bodies Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 3 Typical encounter (Lutetia 21, Rosetta) Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate 4 Primitive bodies: key measurements Reproduced from Castillo-Rogez, Pavone, Nesnas, Hoffman, “Expected Science Return of Spatially-Extended In-Situ Exploration at Small Solar System Bodies,” IEEE Aerospace 2012. Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology / Solar System Exploration Directorate
    [Show full text]
  • On Orbital Debris JEFF FOUST, COLLEGE PARK, Md
    NOVEMBER 24, 2014 SPOTLIGHT Clyde Space See page 12 www.spacenews.com VOLUME 25 ISSUE 46 $4.95 ($7.50 Non-U.S.) PROFILE/22> YVONNE PENDLETON DIRECTOR, SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION RESEARCH VIRTUAL INSTITUTE INSIDE THIS ISSUE LAUNCH INDUSTRY Swift Development of Ariane 6 Urged Applauding the end of a French-German impasse over the Ariane 6 rocket, the European Satellite Operators Association said the vehicle needs to be in service as quickly as possible. See story, page 8 ATK Hints at Antares Engine Selection Alliant Techsystems Chief Executive Mark DeYoung said there are no near-term liquid- propulsion alternatives to Russian engines for U.S. rockets. See story, page 6 ESA PHOTO Virginia May Seek Federal Funds for Wallops > “We have found a compromise that is OK for both countries, for the other participating states and also for industry,” Brigitte Zypries (above), Germany’s Virginia’s two U.S. senators said they may seek federal funds to cover $20 million in repairs to the space minister, said of an agreement under which Germany and France will back the Ariane 6 rocket and scrap the Ariane 5 Midlife Evolution. Wallops Island launch pad damaged when Orbital Sciences’ Antares exploded. See story, page 6 MILITARY SPACE Protected Tactical Waveform Taking Shape German-French Compromise The U.S. Air Force is expected to demonstrate its protected tactical waveform in new modems and reworked terminals as early as 2018. See story, page 11 U.S. To Grant Indirect Access to Space Fence Paves Direct Path to Ariane 6 The Pentagon’s international space surveillance partners will have indirect access to data from the Air Force’s next-generation Space Fence tracking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics a Hipparcos Study of the Hyades
    A&A 367, 111–147 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000410 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics A Hipparcos study of the Hyades open cluster Improved colour-absolute magnitude and Hertzsprung{Russell diagrams J. H. J. de Bruijne, R. Hoogerwerf, and P. T. de Zeeuw Sterrewacht Leiden, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 13 June 2000 / Accepted 24 November 2000 Abstract. Hipparcos parallaxes fix distances to individual stars in the Hyades cluster with an accuracy of ∼6per- cent. We use the Hipparcos proper motions, which have a larger relative precision than the trigonometric paral- laxes, to derive ∼3 times more precise distance estimates, by assuming that all members share the same space motion. An investigation of the available kinematic data confirms that the Hyades velocity field does not contain significant structure in the form of rotation and/or shear, but is fully consistent with a common space motion plus a (one-dimensional) internal velocity dispersion of ∼0.30 km s−1. The improved parallaxes as a set are statistically consistent with the Hipparcos parallaxes. The maximum expected systematic error in the proper motion-based parallaxes for stars in the outer regions of the cluster (i.e., beyond ∼2 tidal radii ∼20 pc) is ∼<0.30 mas. The new parallaxes confirm that the Hipparcos measurements are correlated on small angular scales, consistent with the limits specified in the Hipparcos Catalogue, though with significantly smaller “amplitudes” than claimed by Narayanan & Gould. We use the Tycho–2 long time-baseline astrometric catalogue to derive a set of independent proper motion-based parallaxes for the Hipparcos members.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
    [Show full text]
  • LAST CALL for the DAS Dinner Meeting Tuesday, May17th
    Vol. 56, No. 5, May, 2011 Next Meeting – May 17th, 2011 at 6:00 PM ~ Annual Dinner Meeting at the Hilton Wilmington/Christiana ~ See Pages 4 & 5 for full Details on this Event Celebrating the DAS Amateur Astronomer of the Year FROM THE PRESIDENT ! Bill Hanagan To start off, I’d like to thank Bill McKibben for his LAST CALL for the presentation at the April meeting on the Ancient Astronomy of Machu Picchu and Greg Lee for his presentation on DAS Dinner Meeting “What’s Up in the Sky”. If you missed the April meeting, you also missed my presentation on the sizing, positioning, and th surface quality of Newtonian secondary mirrors. Tuesday, May 17 Our May meeting is the annual “dinner” meeting of the DAS and it will be held on Tuesday, May 17 at the Christiana You’ll need to call Treasurer McKibben Hilton, the same location as last year. Social hour begins at at this late hour for Reservations. 6:00 P.M. followed by dinner at 7:00 P.M. After dinner, we’ll view a short video of time lapse astrophotos followed by the Andrew K. Johnston presentation of the Amateur Astronomer of the Year Award. We’ll conclude the evening with a talk titled “Navigating across from the the Solar System” by Mr. Andrew K. Johnston from the National Smithsonian Air and Space Museum. Mr. Johnston is the co-author of the “Smithsonian Atlas of Space Exploration” and his talk will give National Air & us a look at the history and technology of solar system explora- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumba, Salsa, Smaba and Tango in the Magnetosphere
    ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 2 r bulletin 107 — august 2001 42 ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 3 the cluster quartet’s first year in space Rumba, Salsa, Samba and Tango in the Magnetosphere - The Cluster Quartet’s First Year in Space C.P. Escoubet & M. Fehringer Solar System Division, Space Science Department, ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, Noordwijk, The Netherlands P. Bond Cranleigh, Surrey, United Kingdom Introduction Launch and commissioning phase Cluster is one of the two missions – the other When the first Soyuz blasted off from the being the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory Baikonur Cosmodrome on 16 July 2000, we (SOHO) – constituting the Solar Terrestrial knew that Cluster was well on the way to Science Programme (STSP), the first recovery from the previous launch setback. ‘Cornerstone’ of ESA’s Horizon 2000 However, it was not until the second launch on Programme. The Cluster mission was first 9 August 2000 and the proper injection of the proposed in November 1982 in response to an second pair of spacecraft into orbit that we ESA Call for Proposals for the next series of knew that the Cluster mission was truly back scientific missions. on track (Fig. 1). In fact, the experimenters said that they knew they had an ideal mission only The four Cluster spacecraft were successfully launched in pairs by after switching on their last instruments on the two Russian Soyuz rockets on 16 July and 9 August 2000. On 14 fourth spacecraft. August, the second pair joined the first pair in highly eccentric polar orbits, with an apogee of 19.6 Earth radii and a perigee of 4 Earth radii.
    [Show full text]
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report
    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]