Darwin-Routledge-Philosophers-Tim

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Darwin-Routledge-Philosophers-Tim Darwin ‘Tim Lewens’ new book is a masterclass in the interpretation of Darwin. Anyone wanting to know what Darwin meant and how his words bear on the great debates of our time will find here a rare combination of clarity, learning, and fresh thinking. Indispensable.’ Gregory Radick, University of Leeds ‘A clear, well-written, fair, broad-ranging and student-friendly introduc- tion to Darwinian thinking’ Kim Sterelny, Victoria University of Wellington and Australian National University ‘Charles Darwin has been enlisted to support many different, and often contradictory, intellectual and political agendas. This is a clear and careful philosophical examination of which of these causes Darwin is willing and able to support. An excellent introduction to Darwin’s intellectual orien- tation and the implications of his thought.’ Paul Griffiths, University of Queensland, Australia ‘Charles Darwin remains as influential as ever. He is a hate figure of the religious right which only adds to his lustre in the eyes of everybody else. Tim Lewens brilliantly explores the extraordinary role that Darwin has played not only in science and philosophy but also right across the full range of human affairs. Lewens’ book contradicts the belief that nothing more that is fresh and interesting could be added to all the existing writings about Darwin.’ Sir Patrick Bateson, University of Cambridge, UK Routledge Philosophers Edited by Brian Leiter University of Texas, Austin Routledge Philosophers is a major series of introductions to the great Western philosophers. Each book places a major philosopher or thinker in historical context, explains and assesses their key arguments, and considers their legacy. Additional features include a chronology of major dates and events, chapter summaries, annotated suggestions for further reading and a glossary of technical terms. An ideal starting point for those new to philosophy, they are also essen- tial reading for those interested in the subject at any level. Hobbes A. P. Martinich Leibniz Nicholas Jolley Locke E. J. Lowe Hegel Frederick Beiser Rousseau Nicholas Dent Schopenhauer Julian Young Freud Jonathan Lear Kant Paul Guyer Husserl David Woodruff Smith Darwin Tim Lewens Forthcoming: Aristotle Christopher Shields Spinoza Michael Della Rocca Hume Don Garrett Fichte and Schelling Sebastian Gardner Rawls Samuel Freeman Merleau-Ponty Taylor Carman Heidegger John Richardson Tim Lewens Darwin First published 2007 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2007 Tim Lewens All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lewens, Tim. Darwin / Tim Lewens. p. cm. -- (Routledge philosophers) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-415-34637-5 (hardback : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-415-34637-1 (hardback : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-415-34638-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-415-34638-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882. I. Title. II. Series. B1623.L49 2006 192--dc22 2006014463 ISBN 10: 0-415-34637-1 (hbk) ISBN 10: 0-415-34638-X (pbk) ISBN 10: 0-203-59713-3 (ebk) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-34637-5 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-34638-2 (pbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-203-59713-2 (ebk) For my mum and my dad I suspect the endless round of doubts & scepticisms might be solved by considering the origin of reason. as gradually developed. see Hume on Sceptical Philosophy. Charles Darwin, Notebook N Chapter 59 Wave of Inventions The reign of Queen Victoria was famous for the numerous discoveries and inventions which happened in it. One of the first of these was the brilliant theory of Mr Darwin propounded in his memorable works, Tails of a Grandfather, The Manx Man, Our Mutual Friends, etc. This was known as Elocution or the Origin of Speeches and was fiercely denounced in every pulpit. W. C. Sellar and R. J. Yeatman, 1066 And All That Acknowledgements x Chronology xi A Note on Texts xiii ‘A Philosophical Naturalist’ Introduction 1 1. Dial ‘M’ for ‘Metaphysics’ 1 2. Darwin and Darwinism 4 3. Darwin Unfolding 7 Further Reading 7 Life One 9 1. Pedigree 9 2. From Sport to Science 12 3. The Beagle Voyage 18 4. London, Marriage and the Notebooks 24 5. Down . 29 6. And Out 34 Further Reading 38 Selection Two 39 1. Evolution and Natural Selection 39 2. The Argument for Natural Selection 41 3. Darwin and Lamarck 43 4. ‘Darwin’s Dangerous Idea’ 45 5. Natural Selection and Variation 47 6. Selection and Creativity 50 7. Selection and Population 55 8. Natural Selection Then and Now 58 Further Reading 63 Species Three 65 1. Human Nature, Squid Nature, Apple Nature 65 2. The Tree of Life 66 3. Butchering Nature 70 viii Contents 4. Individuals and Kinds 75 5. Population Thinking and Typological Thinking 83 6. Species Natures 90 Further Reading 93 Evidence Four 95 1. Science and God 95 2. Inference to the Best Explanation 97 3. Herschel and Whewell 101 4. Herschel and the Origin 104 5. Darwin, Whewell and Gemmules 107 6. Natural Selection and Common Ancestry 110 7. The Natural Selection/Intelligent Design Debate 112 8. Evolution with Intelligent Design 120 9. Darwin and Religion 124 Further Reading 126 Mind Five 128 1. Squandered Riches? 128 2. The Three Principles of Emotional Expression 129 3. Common Ancestry 136 4. The Universality of Emotional Expression 138 5. Culture and the Evolutionary Approach 141 6. The Santa Barbara School 146 7. A Single Human Nature? 147 8. The Adaptive Heuristic 151 9. Darwin and Santa Barbara 154 Further Reading 157 Ethics Six 159 1. Ethics from the Side of Natural History 159 2. The Origins of the Moral Sense 162 3. Darwin’s Normative Ethics 167 4. Evolutionary Normative Ethics 171 5. Evolutionary Meta-Ethics 176 Contents ix 6. Group Selection 180 7. Has Evolution made us Selfish? 184 Further Reading 187 Knowledge Seven 189 1. What is Knowledge? 189 2. Empiricism 191 3. Innate Knowledge 192 4. Evolutionary Epistemology: James and Popper 198 5. Memes 202 6. Cultural Evolution without Memes 208 Further Reading 213 Politics Eight 214 1. Darwin and the Right 214 2. Degenerating Society 215 3. Social Darwinism 218 4. Politics and Human Nature 221 5. Darwin and the Equality of the Sexes 223 6. Sex Differences Today 226 7. Darwin and the Left 232 Further Reading 241 Philosophy Nine 243 1. Man’s Place in Nature 243 2. Hubris 245 3. Contingency 246 4. Progress 249 5. Darwinian Naturalism 258 Further Reading 262 Glossary 264 References 272 Index 282 Acknowledgements This book aims to cover a lot of ground, and as a result of that I needed a lot of help in writing it. Many of my friends and colleagues were generous enough to wade through the entire manuscript, and on several occasions they saved me from embar- rassing errors and oversights. I am especially grateful to Patrick Bateson, Tony Bruce, David Buller, Emma Gilby, Paul Griffiths, Nick Jardine, Martin Kusch, Peter Lipton, Matteo Mameli, Greg Radick, Jim Secord, Kim Sterelny and three anonymous readers from Routledge. Every one of them took time to read the whole text closely, and to offer constructive comments on it. For discus- sion and comment on individual chapters I am indebted to André Ariew, Philippe Huneman, Mohan Matthen, Hugh Mellor, Staffan Müller-Wille and Denis Walsh. Tamara Hug, Steve Kruse, Dawn Moutrey and David Thompson provided invaluable logistical and moral support. Christina McLeish helped to produce a fine index. I also owe further thanks to Tony Bruce at Routledge for asking me to write this book, and to Kim Sterelny (whom Tony asked first), for turning the invitation down. Both Cambridge University and Clare College were kind enough to give me a term of sabbatical leave in the autumn of 2005, which enabled me to finish the project. Finally I am grateful to Emma Gilby, who not only made the manuscript better, but who made many other things better, too. Chronology 1809 Charles Robert Darwin born in Shrewsbury, on 12th February. 1817 Darwin’s mother Susannah dies when Charles is aged eight. 1818 Attends Shrewsbury School. Later claims to have learned almost nothing from it. 1825 Begins studying medicine at the University of Edinburgh. He becomes friendly with Robert Grant, a follower of Lamarck. 1828 Bored by his lectures and sickened by surgery, Darwin aban- dons his medical training and arrives at Christ’s College, Cambridge. His new chosen career is that of an Anglican priest. 1831 Graduates from Cambridge (no honours) and goes on his first geological field trip with Professor Adam Sedgwick. Later in the year his botanist friend Henslow arranges for him to travel as ship’s naturalist on board a surveying ship, HMS Beagle. He sets sail on 27th December. 1832–The Beagle carries out its surveying business off the South 1835 American coast. Darwin makes numerous long trips to the interior. Visits the Galapagos Islands in September and October 1835. 1836 The Beagle returns to England, arriving at Falmouth on 2nd October.
Recommended publications
  • Jerry Fodor · Why Pigs Don't Have Wings: the Case Against Natural Selection
    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. (More Information) × LOG IN REGISTER FOR ONLINE ACCESS Search the LRB LATEST ARCHIVE BOOKSHOP CONTACT US ABOUT THE LRB SUBSCRIBE INTRODUCTION BACK ISSUES CONTRIBUTORS CATEGORIES LETTERS AUDIO VIDEO Vol. 29 No. 20 · 18 October 2007 facebook214 twitter 14 share email letter cite print pages 19-22 | 5138 words ‘We are larger | smaller now at our Why Pigs Don’t Have Wings most unequal Jerry Fodor since 1940’ You are invited to read this free essay from the London Review of Books. Ben Rawlence Register for free and enjoy 24 hours of access to the entire LRB archive @ LRB blog Jerry Fodor has of over 12,500 essays and reviews. almost finished a book, with Zenon Pylyshyn, Die Meistersinger is, by Wagner’s standards, quite a cheerful opera. The action turns on comedy’s staple, the marriage plot: get the hero and the heroine safely and truly wed about the semantics of with at least a presumption of happiness ever after. There are cross-currents and mental representation. undercurrents that make Meistersinger’s libretto subtle in ways that the librettos of He teaches at Rutgers. operas usually aren’t. But for once Nietzsche is nowhere in sight and nobody dies; the territory is closer to The Barber of Seville than to The Ring. Yet, in the first scene of Act 3, the avuncular Hans Sachs, whose benevolent interventions smooth the lovers’ MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR course, delivers an aria of bitter reflection on the human condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvaro Moreno Matteo Mossio a Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry
    History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Alvaro Moreno Matteo Mossio Biological Autonomy A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 12 Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffiths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, London, ON) Giuseppe Testa (IFOM-IEA, Milano) J. Scott Turner (Syracuse) Denis
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Biology Edited by David L
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85128-2 - The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology Edited by David L. Hull and Michael Ruse Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY The philosophy of biology is one of the most exciting new areas in the field of philosophy and one that is attracting much attention from working scientists. This Companion, edited by two of the founders of the field, includes newly commissioned essays by senior scholars and by up-and- coming younger scholars who collectively examine the main areas of the subject – the nature of evolutionary theory, classification, teleology and function, ecology, and the prob- lematic relationship between biology and religion, among other topics. Up-to-date and comprehensive in its coverage, this unique volume will be of interest not only to professional philosophers but also to students in the humanities and researchers in the life sciences and related areas of inquiry. David L. Hull is an emeritus professor of philosophy at Northwestern University. The author of numerous books and articles on topics in systematics, evolutionary theory, philosophy of biology, and naturalized epistemology, he is a recipient of a Guggenheim Foundation fellowship and is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Michael Ruse is professor of philosophy at Florida State University. He is the author of many books on evolutionary biology, including Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? and Darwinism and Its Discontents, both published by Cam- bridge University Press. A Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, he has appeared on television and radio, and he contributes regularly to popular media such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Playboy magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Paleyan Biology
    1 Neo-Paleyan Biology Tim Lewens University of Cambridge Department of History and Philosophy of Science Free School Lane Cambridge CB2 3RH Email: [email protected] Abstract There is a ‘Neo-Paleyan’ tradition in British evolutionary theorising, which began with Darwin and continues to the present day. This tradition conceives of adaptation in terms of design, and it often puts natural selection in the role of an ersatz designer. There are significant disanalogies between Paleyan conceptions of design and modern conceptions of adaptation and selection, which help to explain why the neo-Paleyan programme is sometimes treated with hostility. These general disanalogies do not suffice to dismiss the most interesting forms of recent neo-Paleyanism, which draw on theoretical principles such as Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem to ground a general approach to what we can call (following Grafen) the ‘criterion’ of evolutionary design. It is important to distinguish between justifications of this ‘criterion’ and justifications of approaches to nature which presuppose that natural selection produces good designs. 2 Keywords: Adaptation, Andy Gardner, Alan Grafen, Design, Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem, William Paley Funding This work was funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. I am also grateful to the Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, for support during the completion of this project. Acknowledgements Earlier versions of this paper were presented in Copenhagen, Oulu and Paris. I am grateful to audiences there, and to the referees from this journal for comments. I am especially grateful to Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl for remarkably detailed and penetrating remarks on the submitted manuscript, and to Andy Gardner, Jonathan Birch and Samir Okasha for additional suggestions for improvements and clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Andreas Christiansen
    The Ethics of Synthetic Biology Respecting Life and Managing Risk Christiansen, Andreas Publication date: 2016 Document version Other version Document license: CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Christiansen, A. (2016). The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Respecting Life and Managing Risk. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN FACULTY OF HUMANITIES PhD Thesis Andreas Christiansen The Ethics of Synthetic Biology Respecting Life and Managing Risk Advisor: Sune Holm Submitted: 31/08/2016 1 The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Respecting Life and Managing Risk PhD Thesis By Andreas Christiansen Department of Media, Cognition and Communication Section of Philosophy Academic advisor: Sune Holm Submitted 31 August 2016 Word count: 50.700 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements 2 Article overview 4 Introduction 6 Article 1 Synthetic Biology and the Moral Significance of Artificial Life 70 Article 2 Similarity Arguments in the Genetic Modification Debate 92 Article 3 Rationality, Thresholds and the Precautionary Principle 126 Article 4 On the Cognitive Argument for Cost-Benefit Analysis 156 Resume 192 Summary 193 References 194 Acknowledgements My biggest debt is to my advisor, Sune Holm. Sune has provided detailed comments on the entire thesis and on several drafts that never made it into the final products, which no doubt improved the final product. He has been enormously encouraging and helpful, which has made the transition from being a student to a researcher much easier and less frightening than it might otherwise have been. Apart from Sune, several people have read parts of the dissertation or earlier drafts. I want to thank Martin Marchman Andersen, Karin Jønch Clausen, Klemens Kappel, Esben Høgh, Tom Douglas, Julian Savulescu, Michael Plant, Carissa Véliz, Norbert Paulo, Maria Serban, Tanja Rechnitzer, Josefine Pallavicini and Johanna Privitera for providing helpful comments and criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Evolution: a Review of Daniel Dennett's from Bacteria to Bach
    Mental Evolution: A Review of Daniel Dennett's From Bacteria to Bach and Back July 28, 2017 Abstract From Bacteria To Bach and Back is an ambitious book that attempts to integrate a theory about the evolution of the human mind with another theory about the evolution of human culture. It is advertised as a defense of memes, but conceptualizes memes more liberally than has been done before. It is also advertised as a defense of the proposal that natural selec- tion operates on culture, but conceptualizes natural selection as a process in which nearly all interesting parameters are free to vary. This liberal conception of key concepts creates space for philosophical innovation, but occasionally makes the empirical content of the theory difficult to pin down. Nevertheless, the book is full of scientific insight, wit, and humor. It will undoubtedly become a cause of both controversy and inspiration for those interested in naturalistic theories of human culture. 1 Introduction Dennett's new book is a captivating, lively, and expansive account of the evo- lution of the human mind. It is a grand tour that begins with the origins of organisms, ascends to the heights of human culture, and ends with vistas of a future in which algorithms have begun to replace people as generators of cultural novelty. Although the book is about the evolution of the human mind, it is not a work of evolutionary psychology. Dennett wastes little ink speculating about the Pleistocene conditions that may have prompted domain-specific cognitive adaptations. The opening lines of the book pose a pair of questions that provide a more accurate indication of its focus: \How come there are minds?" and \How 1 is it possible for minds to ask and answer this question?" The scope of these questions is unwieldy, and, as usual, Dennett ignores disciplinary boundaries in his attempt to supply an answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Hps.Cam.Ac.Uk
    CONTENTS The Department .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Congratulations .............................................................................................................................. 4 Garden Party in Memory of Mary Hesse ................................................................................... 5 Staff and Visitors ........................................................................................................................... 7 Students .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Comings and Goings .................................................................................................................. 12 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 13 Prizes, Projects and Honours .................................................................................................... 15 Student Prizes .............................................................................................................................. 16 Students .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Darwin‟s Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong Conor Cunningham Bibliography Abbreviations Saint Thomas Aquinas Comp. Theol. Compendium Theologiae De Malo Quaestio disputata de malo De Pot. Quaestio disputata de potentia De Ver. Quaestio disputata de veritate In II Sent. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum Liber II In III Sent. Scriptum super libros Sententiarium Liber III In II Phys. Sententia super Physicam Liber II Joh. Expositio in evangelium Joannis ScG Summa contra Gentiles STh Summa Theologiae Works Cited Ahouse, Jeremy C. ―The Tragedy of a priori Selectionism: Dennett and Gould on Adaptationism.‖ Biology and Philosophy 13, no. 3 (1998): 359-91. Alexander, Denis, and Robert White. Beyond Belief: Science, Faith and Ethical Challenges. Oxford: Lion Hudson Press, 2004. Alexander, Richard D. The Biology of Moral Systems. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, 1987. _____. ―The Search for a General Theory of Behaviour.‖ Behavioural Science 20 (1975): 77- 100. Alroy, John. ―Cope‘s Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Mammals.‖ Science 280 (1998): 731-4. Alter, Torin. ―Phenomenal Knowledge Without Experience.‖ In The Case for Qualia, edited by Edmond Wright, pp. 247-68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008. Alter, Torin, and Sven Walter, eds. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. American Association for the Advancement of Science. ―Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory.‖ (October 18, 2002); available online: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2002/1106id2.shtml; accessed October 12, 2009. Amundson, Ron. ―Adaptation and Development: On the Lack of Common Ground.‖ In Adaptationism and Optimality, edited by Steven Orzack and Elliott Sober, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Neo
    1 2 3 The structure of evolutionary theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, 4 Neo-Lamarckism and biased historical narratives about the 5 Modern Synthesis 6 7 8 9 10 Erik I. Svensson 11 12 Evolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, 13 SWEDEN 14 15 Correspondence: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 1 20 Abstract 21 The last decades have seen frequent calls for a more extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) that 22 will supposedly overcome the limitations in the current evolutionary framework with its 23 intellectual roots in the Modern Synthesis (MS). Some radical critics even want to entirely 24 abandon the current evolutionary framework, claiming that the MS (often erroneously labelled 25 “Neo-Darwinism”) is outdated, and will soon be replaced by an entirely new framework, such 26 as the Third Way of Evolution (TWE). Such criticisms are not new, but have repeatedly re- 27 surfaced every decade since the formation of the MS, and were particularly articulated by 28 developmental biologist Conrad Waddington and paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. 29 Waddington, Gould and later critics argued that the MS was too narrowly focused on genes and 30 natural selection, and that it ignored developmental processes, epigenetics, paleontology and 31 macroevolutionary phenomena. More recent critics partly recycle these old arguments and 32 argue that non-genetic inheritance, niche construction, phenotypic plasticity and developmental 33 bias necessitate major revision of evolutionary theory. Here I discuss these supposed 34 challenges, taking a historical perspective and tracing these arguments back to Waddington and 35 Gould. I dissect the old arguments by Waddington, Gould and more recent critics that the MS 36 was excessively gene centric and became increasingly “hardened” over time and narrowly 37 focused on natural selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Organism and Mechanism
    ORGANISM AND MECHANISM A Critique of Mechanistic Thinking in Biology Submitted by Daniel James Nicholson to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy In September 2010 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. ABSTRACT In this thesis I present a critical examination of the role played by mechanistic ideas in shaping our understanding of living systems. I draw on a combination of historical, philosophical, and scientific resources to uncover a number of problems which I take to result from the adoption of mechanistic thinking in biology. I provide an analysis of the historical development of the conflict between mechanistic and vitalistic conceptions of life since the seventeenth century, and I argue that the basic terms of this conflict remain central to current disputes over the nature of the organism as well as the question of how far the theories, concepts, and methods of physics, chemistry, and engineering can ultimately take us in the explanation of life. I offer a detailed critique of the machine conception of the organism, which constitutes the central unifying idea of mechanistic biology. I argue that this notion, despite its undeniable heuristic value, is fundamentally inadequate as a theory of the organism due to a number of basic differences between organisms and machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Forces
    Preprint. The final version will be published in Synthese: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11229-019-02247-0. A view-only version is available at: https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11229-019-02247- 0?author_access_token=cbJtQBpBf0Nk_G3OcXyU_fe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY6OL4p4R_wxi- hXOIYQiEL8U7hLOp5dEkf7Kus3QiRkTZaKlvcgP363Y2DYTYrj1CCSk4cYF_cH5NF4ScTk- sQiUh9bISJyK7mncLtr7ZZQFw%3D%3D. Cultural evolutionary theory as a theory of forces Lorenzo Baravalle Affiliation: Centre of Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC Address of correspondence: Rua Arcturus 3, Jardim Antares, 09606-070, São Bernardo do Campo (SP) - Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Cultural evolutionary theory has been alternatively compared to a theory of forces, such as Newtonian mechanics, or the kinetic theory of gases. In this article, I clarify the scope and significance of these metatheoretical characterisations. First, I discuss the kinetic analogy, which has been recently put forward by Tim Lewens. According to it, cultural evolutionary theory is grounded on a bottom-up methodology, which highlights the additive effects of social learning biases on the emergence of large-scale cultural phenomena. Lewens supports this claim by arguing that it is a consequence of cultural evolutionists’ widespread commitment to population thinking. While I concur with Lewens that cultural evolutionists often actually conceive cultural change in aggregative terms, I think that the kinetic framework does not properly account for the explanatory import of population- level descriptions in cultural evolutionary theory. Starting from a criticism of Lewens’ interpretation of population thinking, I argue that the explanatory role of such descriptions is best understood within a dynamical framework – that is, a framework according to which cultural evolutionary theory is a theory of forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Sara Green Editor Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers
    History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Sara Green Editor Philosophy of Systems Biology Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, London, ON) Giuseppe Testa (IFOM-IEA, Milano) J. Scott Turner (Syracuse) Denis
    [Show full text]