DOCSLIB.ORG

Sara Green Editor Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sara Green Editor Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Sara Green Editor Philosophy of Systems Biology Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, London, ON) Giuseppe Testa (IFOM-IEA, Milano) J. Scott Turner (Syracuse) Denis Walsh (Toronto) Marcel Weber (Geneva) More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8916 Sara Green Editor Philosophy of Systems Biology Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers Editor Sara Green Department of Science Education University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark ISSN 2211-1948 ISSN 2211-1956 (electronic) History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ISBN 978-3-319-46999-7 ISBN 978-3-319-47000-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016959572 © Springer International Publishing AG 2017 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface Do you want to know what scientists and philosophers really think? You will not find that in the typical journal paper or even conference talk. If you are lucky enough to be able to sit down with them at a pub, they may open up to you. But most of us are not so lucky. The intention with this volume is to offer an alternative to the typi- cal academic publications by providing a format for scholars to freely express their personal opinions and tell their story. I have asked a selection of systems biologists and philosophers to address the same set of questions designed to probe their approaches, aspirations, interests, and frustrations in an informal manner. I hope that the volume at the same time can serve as an introduction to philosophy of sys- tems biology and as a source of insight to what motivates people engaged in systems biology or its philosophy. Moreover, I hope it can serve as a starting point for dis- cussions of the implications of systems biology for philosophy, science, and society. Of course, if you want to pursue the dialogue beyond these initial statements, it is up to you to engage the scholars in discussions about questions you most care about. The emergence of and research within systems biology reveal the depth of the fascinating and overwhelming challenge of understanding biological complexity. While the problem of biological complexity unites systems biology research, the strategies pursued to deal with this challenge are diverse. The wish to compile a selection of viewpoints on philosophy of systems biology in this volume is in part inspired by my own fascination (and frustration) with the difficulty of coming to grips with what systems biology is as I was pursuing my PhD project on the philoso- phy of systems biology. As I worked my way through much of the literature in and about systems biology, and asked practicing scientists what systems biology is all about, I realized that there are many different views on what systems biology is or should be. These differences should not only be regarded as signs that systems biol- ogy is a new, and perhaps immature, approach in development. Rather, the diverse views on the significant aspects of and future directions for systems biology reflect how many different scientific traditions come together and impact what it means to do biological research. I have come to see these differences, whether revealed through heated scientific disagreements or through subtle methodological diversities, v vi Preface as a rich source for philosophical insights into the characteristics of epistemic cul- tures and scientific worldviews of practicing scientists. This volume is therefore motivated by an interest in getting insight into the aspects of systems biology which prominent scholars take to be its most salient features and to give them the chance to freely express their views on the scope, aim, and future directions of systems biology. The contributions of this volume are not intended as review articles but as per- sonal perspectives on the philosophical implications of systems biology in response to five questions (listed below). I have left it open to the authors whether they wanted to answer all questions or a subset and whether they wanted to present their view- points as separate answers to the questions or as an essay. The questions addressed in this volume are as follows: – How and why were you initially drawn to systems biology? – How do you view the relation between philosophy and systems biology, and (how) can these fields inform each other? – What do you consider the most neglected topics and/or contributions in the late twentieth-century (philosophy of) biology? – What have been the most significant advances in systems biology? – What do you consider the most important problems in (philosophy of) systems biology, and what are the prospects for progress in this respect? To serve the intended purpose for this volume, I found it important to address practicing scientists as well as philosophers. Since my intention has been to open up these discussions for debate, the following introduction is mainly written as a guide to the philosophical questions raised in discussions in and about systems biology, by pointing to various viewpoints and topics discussed in this volume. After each con- tribution, there will be a short list of suggested readings for each author for readers interested in learning more about the work of specific contributors. Acknowledgements I am grateful that so many prominent scholars accepted the invitation to provide their perspectives, and I would like to thank them all for their insightful and thought- provoking answers. I also thank the authors for useful feedback on the introductory chapter and inputs on various choices in the editing process. Sadly, one of the contributors, Eric Davidson, passed away in September 2015. Eric Davidson will be remembered as a key figure in systems biology as well as developmental biology due to his pioneering and groundbreaking investigation of gene regulatory networks. While editing the volume, I have benefitted from support by the Centre for Science Studies (Aarhus University), the Center for Philosophy of Science (University of Pittsburgh), and the Department of Science Education (University of Copenhagen). I thank two anonymous reviewers for useful feedback on the whole book, Maria Serban and Mette Skau for their help and support, and the staff and editors at Springer for professional handling and production of the book. The copy-editing of the volume has been financially supported by Lillian and Dan Finks Fund. Sara Green vii Contents 1 Introduction to Philosophy of Systems Biology .................................... 1 Sara Green 2 Systems Biology: Negotiating Between Holism and Reductionism.................................................................................... 25 William Bechtel 3 A System Approach to Cancer. From Things to Relations .................. 37 Marta Bertolaso 4 Systems Biology in the Broad Sense ...................................................... 49 Fred C. Boogerd
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jerry Fodor · Why Pigs Don't Have Wings: the Case Against Natural Selection
    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. (More Information) × LOG IN REGISTER FOR ONLINE ACCESS Search the LRB LATEST ARCHIVE BOOKSHOP CONTACT US ABOUT THE LRB SUBSCRIBE INTRODUCTION BACK ISSUES CONTRIBUTORS CATEGORIES LETTERS AUDIO VIDEO Vol. 29 No. 20 · 18 October 2007 facebook214 twitter 14 share email letter cite print pages 19-22 | 5138 words ‘We are larger | smaller now at our Why Pigs Don’t Have Wings most unequal Jerry Fodor since 1940’ You are invited to read this free essay from the London Review of Books. Ben Rawlence Register for free and enjoy 24 hours of access to the entire LRB archive @ LRB blog Jerry Fodor has of over 12,500 essays and reviews. almost finished a book, with Zenon Pylyshyn, Die Meistersinger is, by Wagner’s standards, quite a cheerful opera. The action turns on comedy’s staple, the marriage plot: get the hero and the heroine safely and truly wed about the semantics of with at least a presumption of happiness ever after. There are cross-currents and mental representation. undercurrents that make Meistersinger’s libretto subtle in ways that the librettos of He teaches at Rutgers. operas usually aren’t. But for once Nietzsche is nowhere in sight and nobody dies; the territory is closer to The Barber of Seville than to The Ring. Yet, in the first scene of Act 3, the avuncular Hans Sachs, whose benevolent interventions smooth the lovers’ MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR course, delivers an aria of bitter reflection on the human condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvaro Moreno Matteo Mossio a Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry
    History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Alvaro Moreno Matteo Mossio Biological Autonomy A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 12 Editors Charles T. Wolfe, Ghent University, Belgium Philippe Huneman, IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffiths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, London, ON) Giuseppe Testa (IFOM-IEA, Milano) J. Scott Turner (Syracuse) Denis
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Biology Edited by David L
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85128-2 - The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology Edited by David L. Hull and Michael Ruse Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY The philosophy of biology is one of the most exciting new areas in the field of philosophy and one that is attracting much attention from working scientists. This Companion, edited by two of the founders of the field, includes newly commissioned essays by senior scholars and by up-and- coming younger scholars who collectively examine the main areas of the subject – the nature of evolutionary theory, classification, teleology and function, ecology, and the prob- lematic relationship between biology and religion, among other topics. Up-to-date and comprehensive in its coverage, this unique volume will be of interest not only to professional philosophers but also to students in the humanities and researchers in the life sciences and related areas of inquiry. David L. Hull is an emeritus professor of philosophy at Northwestern University. The author of numerous books and articles on topics in systematics, evolutionary theory, philosophy of biology, and naturalized epistemology, he is a recipient of a Guggenheim Foundation fellowship and is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Michael Ruse is professor of philosophy at Florida State University. He is the author of many books on evolutionary biology, including Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? and Darwinism and Its Discontents, both published by Cam- bridge University Press. A Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, he has appeared on television and radio, and he contributes regularly to popular media such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Playboy magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Paleyan Biology
    1 Neo-Paleyan Biology Tim Lewens University of Cambridge Department of History and Philosophy of Science Free School Lane Cambridge CB2 3RH Email: [email protected] Abstract There is a ‘Neo-Paleyan’ tradition in British evolutionary theorising, which began with Darwin and continues to the present day. This tradition conceives of adaptation in terms of design, and it often puts natural selection in the role of an ersatz designer. There are significant disanalogies between Paleyan conceptions of design and modern conceptions of adaptation and selection, which help to explain why the neo-Paleyan programme is sometimes treated with hostility. These general disanalogies do not suffice to dismiss the most interesting forms of recent neo-Paleyanism, which draw on theoretical principles such as Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem to ground a general approach to what we can call (following Grafen) the ‘criterion’ of evolutionary design. It is important to distinguish between justifications of this ‘criterion’ and justifications of approaches to nature which presuppose that natural selection produces good designs. 2 Keywords: Adaptation, Andy Gardner, Alan Grafen, Design, Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem, William Paley Funding This work was funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. I am also grateful to the Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, for support during the completion of this project. Acknowledgements Earlier versions of this paper were presented in Copenhagen, Oulu and Paris. I am grateful to audiences there, and to the referees from this journal for comments. I am especially grateful to Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl for remarkably detailed and penetrating remarks on the submitted manuscript, and to Andy Gardner, Jonathan Birch and Samir Okasha for additional suggestions for improvements and clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Andreas Christiansen
    The Ethics of Synthetic Biology Respecting Life and Managing Risk Christiansen, Andreas Publication date: 2016 Document version Other version Document license: CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Christiansen, A. (2016). The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Respecting Life and Managing Risk. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN FACULTY OF HUMANITIES PhD Thesis Andreas Christiansen The Ethics of Synthetic Biology Respecting Life and Managing Risk Advisor: Sune Holm Submitted: 31/08/2016 1 The Ethics of Synthetic Biology: Respecting Life and Managing Risk PhD Thesis By Andreas Christiansen Department of Media, Cognition and Communication Section of Philosophy Academic advisor: Sune Holm Submitted 31 August 2016 Word count: 50.700 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements 2 Article overview 4 Introduction 6 Article 1 Synthetic Biology and the Moral Significance of Artificial Life 70 Article 2 Similarity Arguments in the Genetic Modification Debate 92 Article 3 Rationality, Thresholds and the Precautionary Principle 126 Article 4 On the Cognitive Argument for Cost-Benefit Analysis 156 Resume 192 Summary 193 References 194 Acknowledgements My biggest debt is to my advisor, Sune Holm. Sune has provided detailed comments on the entire thesis and on several drafts that never made it into the final products, which no doubt improved the final product. He has been enormously encouraging and helpful, which has made the transition from being a student to a researcher much easier and less frightening than it might otherwise have been. Apart from Sune, several people have read parts of the dissertation or earlier drafts. I want to thank Martin Marchman Andersen, Karin Jønch Clausen, Klemens Kappel, Esben Høgh, Tom Douglas, Julian Savulescu, Michael Plant, Carissa Véliz, Norbert Paulo, Maria Serban, Tanja Rechnitzer, Josefine Pallavicini and Johanna Privitera for providing helpful comments and criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Evolution: a Review of Daniel Dennett's from Bacteria to Bach
    Mental Evolution: A Review of Daniel Dennett's From Bacteria to Bach and Back July 28, 2017 Abstract From Bacteria To Bach and Back is an ambitious book that attempts to integrate a theory about the evolution of the human mind with another theory about the evolution of human culture. It is advertised as a defense of memes, but conceptualizes memes more liberally than has been done before. It is also advertised as a defense of the proposal that natural selec- tion operates on culture, but conceptualizes natural selection as a process in which nearly all interesting parameters are free to vary. This liberal conception of key concepts creates space for philosophical innovation, but occasionally makes the empirical content of the theory difficult to pin down. Nevertheless, the book is full of scientific insight, wit, and humor. It will undoubtedly become a cause of both controversy and inspiration for those interested in naturalistic theories of human culture. 1 Introduction Dennett's new book is a captivating, lively, and expansive account of the evo- lution of the human mind. It is a grand tour that begins with the origins of organisms, ascends to the heights of human culture, and ends with vistas of a future in which algorithms have begun to replace people as generators of cultural novelty. Although the book is about the evolution of the human mind, it is not a work of evolutionary psychology. Dennett wastes little ink speculating about the Pleistocene conditions that may have prompted domain-specific cognitive adaptations. The opening lines of the book pose a pair of questions that provide a more accurate indication of its focus: \How come there are minds?" and \How 1 is it possible for minds to ask and answer this question?" The scope of these questions is unwieldy, and, as usual, Dennett ignores disciplinary boundaries in his attempt to supply an answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Hps.Cam.Ac.Uk
    CONTENTS The Department .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Congratulations .............................................................................................................................. 4 Garden Party in Memory of Mary Hesse ................................................................................... 5 Staff and Visitors ........................................................................................................................... 7 Students .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Comings and Goings .................................................................................................................. 12 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 13 Prizes, Projects and Honours .................................................................................................... 15 Student Prizes .............................................................................................................................. 16 Students .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Version [3055K]
    Vol. 8 | Fall 2013 Moving Localities Journal of History of Science and Technology ISSN 1646-7752 www.johost.eu Cover Front cover of Colloquies on the simples (Goa, 1563) (BNP) Journal of History of Science and Technology Vol.8, Fall 2013 ISSN 1646-7752 www.johost.eu Published by Interuniversity Centre for the History of Science and Technology CIUHCT – www.ciuhct.com Faculty of Sciences University of Lisbon Faculty of Sciences and Technology New University of Lisbon Institute of Social Sciences ICS - University of Lisbon www.ics.ul.pt Interdisciplinary Centre for History, Cultures and Society CIDEHUS - University of Évora www.cidehus.uevora.pt Centre of Studies of History and Philosophy of Science CEHFCi - University of Évora www.cehfci.org Design / webdesign Carlos Francisco [email protected] Editorial Board Chief editor Ana Carneiro (CIUHCT, Faculty of Sciences and Technology - New University of Lisbon) Book Review Editor Marta Macedo (CIUHCT, Faculty of Sciences - University of Lisbon) Editorial Board Maria Paula Diogo (Faculty of Sciences and Technology - New University of Lisbon) Henrique Leitão, (Faculty of Sciences - University of Lisbon) Ana Cardoso de Matos (University of Évora) Ana Simões (Faculty of Sciences - University of Lisbon) Tiago Saraiva (Institute of Social Sciences - University of Lisbon) Fátima Nunes (University of Évora) Palmira Fontes Costa (Faculty of Sciences and Technology - New University of Lisbon) Elvira Callapez (CIUHCT) Luís Miguel Carolino (CIUHCT) Advisory Board Cristiana Bastos (University of Lisbon)
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Darwin‟s Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong Conor Cunningham Bibliography Abbreviations Saint Thomas Aquinas Comp. Theol. Compendium Theologiae De Malo Quaestio disputata de malo De Pot. Quaestio disputata de potentia De Ver. Quaestio disputata de veritate In II Sent. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum Liber II In III Sent. Scriptum super libros Sententiarium Liber III In II Phys. Sententia super Physicam Liber II Joh. Expositio in evangelium Joannis ScG Summa contra Gentiles STh Summa Theologiae Works Cited Ahouse, Jeremy C. ―The Tragedy of a priori Selectionism: Dennett and Gould on Adaptationism.‖ Biology and Philosophy 13, no. 3 (1998): 359-91. Alexander, Denis, and Robert White. Beyond Belief: Science, Faith and Ethical Challenges. Oxford: Lion Hudson Press, 2004. Alexander, Richard D. The Biology of Moral Systems. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, 1987. _____. ―The Search for a General Theory of Behaviour.‖ Behavioural Science 20 (1975): 77- 100. Alroy, John. ―Cope‘s Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Mammals.‖ Science 280 (1998): 731-4. Alter, Torin. ―Phenomenal Knowledge Without Experience.‖ In The Case for Qualia, edited by Edmond Wright, pp. 247-68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008. Alter, Torin, and Sven Walter, eds. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. American Association for the Advancement of Science. ―Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory.‖ (October 18, 2002); available online: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2002/1106id2.shtml; accessed October 12, 2009. Amundson, Ron. ―Adaptation and Development: On the Lack of Common Ground.‖ In Adaptationism and Optimality, edited by Steven Orzack and Elliott Sober, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Neo
    1 2 3 The structure of evolutionary theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, 4 Neo-Lamarckism and biased historical narratives about the 5 Modern Synthesis 6 7 8 9 10 Erik I. Svensson 11 12 Evolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, 13 SWEDEN 14 15 Correspondence: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 1 20 Abstract 21 The last decades have seen frequent calls for a more extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) that 22 will supposedly overcome the limitations in the current evolutionary framework with its 23 intellectual roots in the Modern Synthesis (MS). Some radical critics even want to entirely 24 abandon the current evolutionary framework, claiming that the MS (often erroneously labelled 25 “Neo-Darwinism”) is outdated, and will soon be replaced by an entirely new framework, such 26 as the Third Way of Evolution (TWE). Such criticisms are not new, but have repeatedly re- 27 surfaced every decade since the formation of the MS, and were particularly articulated by 28 developmental biologist Conrad Waddington and paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. 29 Waddington, Gould and later critics argued that the MS was too narrowly focused on genes and 30 natural selection, and that it ignored developmental processes, epigenetics, paleontology and 31 macroevolutionary phenomena. More recent critics partly recycle these old arguments and 32 argue that non-genetic inheritance, niche construction, phenotypic plasticity and developmental 33 bias necessitate major revision of evolutionary theory. Here I discuss these supposed 34 challenges, taking a historical perspective and tracing these arguments back to Waddington and 35 Gould. I dissect the old arguments by Waddington, Gould and more recent critics that the MS 36 was excessively gene centric and became increasingly “hardened” over time and narrowly 37 focused on natural selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Organism and Mechanism
    ORGANISM AND MECHANISM A Critique of Mechanistic Thinking in Biology Submitted by Daniel James Nicholson to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy In September 2010 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. ABSTRACT In this thesis I present a critical examination of the role played by mechanistic ideas in shaping our understanding of living systems. I draw on a combination of historical, philosophical, and scientific resources to uncover a number of problems which I take to result from the adoption of mechanistic thinking in biology. I provide an analysis of the historical development of the conflict between mechanistic and vitalistic conceptions of life since the seventeenth century, and I argue that the basic terms of this conflict remain central to current disputes over the nature of the organism as well as the question of how far the theories, concepts, and methods of physics, chemistry, and engineering can ultimately take us in the explanation of life. I offer a detailed critique of the machine conception of the organism, which constitutes the central unifying idea of mechanistic biology. I argue that this notion, despite its undeniable heuristic value, is fundamentally inadequate as a theory of the organism due to a number of basic differences between organisms and machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo's Cosmological View from the Sidereus Nuncius
    FRANCO GIUDICE GALILEO’S COSMOLOGICAL VIEW FROM THE SIDEREUS NUNCIUS TO LETTERS ON SUNSPOTS ESTRATTO da GALILÆANA STUDIES IN RENAISSANCE AND EARLY MODERN SCIENCE Anno XI - 2014 Leo S. Olschki Editore Firenze GALILÆANAGALILÆANA JouStudiesrnal o f inG aRenaissancelilean Studies and Early Modern Science Galilæana approfondisce lo studio di tutti gli aspetti connessi alla figu- ra, aAsll’o indicatedpera, alle abycq uitsis iznewioni subtitlescientifi c–h eStudiese alla finor tRenaissanceuna di Galil eando G Earlyalilei. ModernPromoss Sciencea dal M u–s theeo G objectivealileo, e` pofub Galilaeanablicata sott ois gtoli apublishuspici d studieselle Un ionver stheita` lifedi F andiren zworke, Pa ofdo Galileo,va, Pisa easD wellomu ass Gresearchalilæan anot, e hdirectlya una p pertainingeriodicita` a tonn Galiuale-. leo, Gbutali lwhichæana hneverthelessa una signif ifocusescativa a ponpe relatedndice – figuresGalilæ aandna o themesn-line – fromsul s itheto earlyweb dmodernel Mus eperiod.o Galil Galilaeanaeo (www.m isu ssponsoredeogalileo.i tby/ga thelila eMuseoana.htm Galileol). Olt rande ag isli publishedindici cum uannuallylativi de lunderla rivis tthea, G auspicesalilæana ofon the-lin eUniversitypubblica laofd Florence,ocumenta ztheio- Universityne integrat iofva Padua,(testi m theano Universityscritti e a softa mPisa,pa, andtesti thedig iDomustali e m Galilaeana.ateriale icon o- grafAnico )indexcitata ofne allgli pastartic oissuesli a s taofm Galilaeanapa e indica, tincludinga con il si mthebo tableslo of con- tents of the articles published, lists of the accompanying source material and documentation (manuscripts and printed works, iconographic material), and links to digitalized copies of the material in this archive, may be accessed at theGa lwebsiteilæana sofea rtheche sMuseointo a lGalileol of the awww.museogalileo.it/galilaeana.htmlspects concerning the figure, work, scientific findings and fortunes of Galileo Galilei.
    [Show full text]