Migraine, Memory Loss, and “Multiple Sclerosis”. Neurological Features of the Antiphospholipid (Hughes’) Syndrome G R V Hughes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Migraine, Memory Loss, and “Multiple Sclerosis”. Neurological Features of the Antiphospholipid (Hughes’) Syndrome G R V Hughes 81 REVIEW Migraine, memory loss, and “multiple sclerosis”. Neurological features of the antiphospholipid (Hughes’) syndrome G R V Hughes ............................................................................................................................. Postgrad Med J 2003;79:81–83 The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, Hughes’ away the commonest symptom reported was syndrome), first described in 1983, is a prothrombotic headache: not evidence based medicine perhaps, but a pointer to the importance of this disease in which neurological events feature symptom.5 prominently. Strokes, transient ischaemic attacks, and The history is remarkably similar in many headaches (including migraine) are important patients with teenage headaches that are fre- quently migrainous—often premenstrual—often complications. However, it is clear that other disappearing for 10–20 years only to return in the neurological symptoms, including diplopia, memory 30s or 40s. There is, significantly, a strong family loss, ataxia, and “multiple sclerosis-like” features are history of headaches or of migraine in many of our patients, pointing to genetic influences. In common. A notable feature of Hughes’ syndrome is the some patients the headaches are accompanied by clinical response to anticoagulants; features such as visual or speech disturbance, or by transient headache and memory loss often improving ischaemic attacks. It is my view that antiphospholipid antibody dramatically with appropriate warfarin dosage. APS testing should be among the armamentarium of may well become recognised as an important (and those investigating migraine or recurrent potentially treatable) cause of neurological disease. headache.6 .......................................................................... Memory loss All those dealing with large numbers of patients t is now recognised that antiphospholipid with the syndrome recognise memory loss as syndrome (APS) is a major neurological possibly the most important feature. Unfortu- disease.1 The syndrome, first described in 1983, I nately, as yet, there have been few formal psycho- is characterised by recurrent thrombosis (both metric studies of these patients—for example, venous and arterial), recurrent miscarriage, before and after anticoagulation treatment is neurological disease, including stroke, and the started. presence of circulating antibodies against In some patients, the disease, if untreated, phospholipids.2 progresses to widespread brain infarction, grossly Our early studies focused on lupus, but we rec- abnormal magnetic resonance images and, ulti- ognised that the syndrome was just as prevalent mately, multi-infarct dementia. outside lupus and called this syndrome the In the majority of patients, the memory loss is antiphospholipid syndrome. The title is not strictly correct—the antibodies are in fact di- less extreme—though sufficiently frightening for the patient to worry about the possibility of rected against phospholipids and proteins. 7 The syndrome is now recognised as a common Alzheimer’s disease. It is this aspect of the and important prothrombotic condition with syndrome which—like headaches—often im- ramifications into almost all spheres of medicine, proves when anticoagulation is started. surgery, and obstetrics. While our earliest descriptions highlighted the Epilepsy neurological aspects of the syndrome (strokes, Seizures are a feature of APS: indeed in a patient chorea, myelopathy, headaches, memory loss, and with lupus presenting with seizures, APS is the dementia),34 the full impact of the syndrome on most likely underlying pathology—an observa- neurology is now becoming more widely recog- tion with therapeutic implications. nised. All ages are affected, and all forms of epilepsy ....................... are seen, as are subclinical (abnormal electroen- CLINICAL FEATURES cephalogram) forms. The association of anti- Correspondence to: This short review addresses these nervous system phospholipid antibody with epilepsy, first re- Dr Graham Hughes, Lupus features, their pathogenesis, and their manage- ported in 1985,8 may be of significant importance Unit, St Thomas’ Hospital, 9 London SE1 7EH; ment. in the investigation of seizures in general. [email protected] Headache and migraine Submitted 29 July 2002 Recently, we set up a patients’ website on APS Accepted ................................................. 30 October 2002 (www.hughes-syndrome.org). In the first week of Abbreviations: APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; INR, ....................... operation we received over 20 000 hits. Far and international normalised ratio www.postgradmedj.com 82 Hughes most significantly of all, in the majority of the patients A typical scenario ultimately correctly diagnosed and appropriately anticoagu- lated, there were no further neurological events. A 39 year old woman complained of headaches, fatigue, Clearly, there will be many similar studies to come. and memory loss. She was concerned about a possible However, it seems probable that a small percent of patients diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. diagnosed with multiple sclerosis do in fact have Hughes’ syn- Two years earlier, she had suffered from similar drome, a condition with totally different treatment and prog- headaches, associated with gait disturbance and ataxia. nosis. She had been investigated for multiple sclerosis but brain magnetic resonance imaging had been normal. Chorea Her past history included a strong teenage tendency to Our original studies in 1983 included chorea. Although rare, headaches, often migrainous. this feature has been strongly associated with the presence of In her 20s she had been investigated for infertility, but antiphospholipid antibodies—indeed, the combination in on two occasions had conceived only to suffer a some APS patients of joint pains, heart murmurs and chorea miscarriage at three months. At the age of 35 she had a has led, not unexpectedly, to a label of “rheumatic fever”. successful pregnancy. Although the precise pathophysiology of the chorea is unclear, In view of the possible diagnosis of APS (Hughes’ syn- an interesting clinical observation has been made that in a drome), blood tests for antiphospholipid antibodies were small number of patients, the chorea has ceased with the ordered and found to be strongly positive. institution of anticoagulants. She was treated initially with aspirin 75 mg daily, with moderate though incomplete resolution of the headaches. Neuropathy Ultimately, in view of the known prothrombotic nature of Possibly one of the more surprising findings has been the APS, and especially its neurological and obstetric sequlae, association in some patients between antiphospholipid the patient was anticoagulated with warfarin. antibodies and neuropathy, both peripheral and cranial. In Not only did this treatment result in disappearance of the classical lupus, peripheral neuropathy is relatively uncommon, headaches, but the patient noted a marked improvement in and larger numbers will be required before this possible memory. Interestingly, these two major symptoms returned association can be confirmed. whenever the international normalised ratio (INR) fell below 2.5. Behavioural disorders A number of cases of frontal lobe ischaemia, with its attendant behavioural disorder, have been seen (this author was referred Stroke one 3 year old boy with an aggressive behavioural disorder The commonest serious complication of APS is stroke. Indeed, found to be associated with multiple cerebral infarcts). To date the syndrome is becoming recognised as a major, and there have been surprisingly few studies detailing the potentially preventable, cause of stroke. It has been estimated neuropsychiatric manifestations of APS. that up to one in five of all young (under 45) strokes are asso- ciated with Hughes’ syndrome, although all ages can be Treatment affected. The clinical spectrum ranges from transient ischae- Anticoagulation is required. Current experience shows that mic attacks and focal lesions—such as amaurosis fugax—to antiphospholipid antibodies constitute a significant risk for widespread cerebral infarction, ataxia, bladder, and gait thrombosis, including stroke. For example, in our clinic, in a disturbance and—in extreme cases—multi-infarct dementia. 10 year retrospective analysis, no fewer than 50% of those More than anything else, it is this propensity to (arterial) individuals (mainly lupus patients or women with recurrent stroke which marks out Hughes’ syndrome from the other less miscarriage) with positive antibodies in 1985 had developed serious coagulopathies such as factor V Leiden deficiency. thrombosis by 1995.12 A more difficult decision is whether to use aspirin alone or Myelopathy to anticoagulate with warfarin. Most data currently available Transverse myelopathy is a rare but well recognised feature of point to the superiority of warfarin if there has been clear cut APS. It is sometimes associated with optic nerve ischaemia cerebral ischaemia. (Devic’s disease). The pathology of the myelopathy is poorly Khamashta et al analysed APS patients over a 10 year understood. However, some interesting observations have period.13 Of those treated with aspirin alone, over half come from the mouse model of APS. Some of these animals developed further thrombosis. Likewise, in those treated with which develop an APS-like disease became paraplegic. Histol- warfarin to an INR of less than 3, one half developed further ogy of the spinal cord in these animals showed vessel thrombosis. Only in those
Recommended publications
  • Stand up to Chronic Migraine with Botox®
    #1 PRESCRIBED BRANDED TREATMENT FOR CHRONIC MIGRAINE* Chronic Migraine DON’T LIE DOWN BOTOX ® STAND UP TO Prevention CHRONIC MIGRAINE® WITH BOTOX Treatment Experience Treatment *Truven Health MarketScan Data, October 2010-April 2017. Prevent Headaches and Migraines Before They Even Start BOTOX ® BOTOX® prevents on average 8 to 9 headache days and migraine/probable migraine days a month (vs 6 to 7 for placebo) Savings Program For adults with Chronic Migraine, 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting 4 hours or more. BOTOX® is not approved for adults with migraine who have 14 or fewer headache days a month. Indication • Spread of toxin effects. The effect of botulinum toxin may affect areas BOTOX® is a prescription medicine that is injected to prevent headaches in adults away from the injection site and cause serious symptoms including: loss of with chronic migraine who have 15 or more days each month with headache strength and all-over muscle weakness, double vision, blurred vision and lasting 4 or more hours each day in people 18 years or older. drooping eyelids, hoarseness or change or loss of voice, trouble saying words It is not known whether BOTOX® is safe or effective to prevent headaches clearly, loss of bladder control, trouble breathing, trouble swallowing. in patients with migraine who have 14 or fewer headache days each month There has not been a confirmed serious case of spread of toxin effect away from (episodic migraine). the injection site when BOTOX® has been used at the recommended dose to IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION treat chronic migraine. Resources BOTOX® may cause serious side effects that can be life threatening.
    [Show full text]
  • The Migraine-Epilepsy Syndrome
    medigraphic Artemisaen línea Arch Neurocien (Mex) Vol 11, No. 4: 282-287, 2006 The Migraine- Epilepsy Syndrome Arch Neurocien (Mex) Vol. 11, No. 4: 282-287, 2006 Artículo de revisión ©INNN, 2006 de caso The migraine-epilepsy syndrome Enrique Otero Siliceo†, Fernando Zermeño EL SINDROME MIGRAÑA-EPILEPSIA represent a neural exitation. Since that the glutamate has in important rol in both patologys depending of the part of the brain more affected the symptoms might RESUMEN vary from visual to abdominal phemomena. La migraña y la epilepsia tienen varios puntos en común Key words: migraine epilepsy, EEG abnormalities, sintomática clínica y genéticamente lo que ha sido glutamate, diagnosis. postulado por más de cien años. El fenómeno referido como migraña-epilepsia sugiere que exista una he first steps of a practical, approach by patofisiología común. El síndrome de migraña o physicians in recognizing and treating neuro- epilepsia tiene fenómenos comunes de dolor adominal T logic diseases are to recognithat there are jaqueca anormalidades del EE y respuesta a droga various overlaps between migraine and epilepsy. antiepilépticas. En ocasiones el paciente puede tener Epileptic seizures and classic migraine episodes may un ataque migrañoso o una convulsión o en otras occur in the same patient. Migraine and epilepsy share ambas. La comorbilidad puede explicarse por estados several genetic, clinical, evolutive and neurophysio- de hiperrexcitabilidad neural. Alteraciones electroen- logic features. A relationship between epilepsy and cefalográficas son comunes en estos estados. En migraine has been postulated for over a hundred years apariencia el glutamato tiene un papel importante tanto and the syndrome of Migraine-Epilepsy illustrates this en la migraña como en la epilepsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Neurological Disorders DOI: 10.4172/2329-6895.1000275 ISSN: 2329-6895
    olog eur ica N l D f i o s l o a r n d r e u r s o J Derakhshan, J Neurol Disord 2016, 4:4 Journal of Neurological Disorders DOI: 10.4172/2329-6895.1000275 ISSN: 2329-6895 Research Article Open Access Successful Opioid Monotherapy in Migralepsy: A Case Series Iraj Derakhshan* Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve and Cincinnati Universities, Ohio, USA *Corresponding author: Iraj Derakhshan, Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve and Cincinnati Universities, Ohio, 205 Cyrus Drive, Charleston West Virginia, 25314, USA, Tel: 304 345 5174; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: June 10, 2016; Acc date: July 06, 2016; Pub date: July 10, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Derakhshan I. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Background: There is a consensus that migraine and epilepsy are comorbid conditions. The novel concept explored and developed in this case series is that of the primacy of headaches in generating seizures in those patients suffering from migraine-triggered epilepsy (i.e., migralepsy). As demonstrated in the five cases descried here, much like the effect of ketogenic-diet on migraine-triggered epilepsy, once the migraine headaches were completely suppressed after adopting daily scheduled opioid therapy the seizures stopped from occurring, but they returned with the recurrence of the migraines once the patients had stopped their daily opiate regimen for any reason. Clinical implications: The above pharmacological scenario is reminiscent of a similar but naturalistic course of events as described in reports concerning the salutary effects of ketogenic diet, or restoration of sleep, in cases of migraine-triggered epilepsy.
    [Show full text]
  • Migraine Mimics
    ISSN 0017-8748 Headache doi: 10.1111/head.12518 © 2015 American Headache Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Expert Opinion Migraine Mimics Randolph W. Evans, MD The symptoms of migraine are non-specific and can be present in many other primary and secondary headache disorders, which are reviewed. Even experienced headache specialists may be challenged at times when diagnosing what appears to be first or worst, new type, migraine status, and chronic migraine. Key words: migraine, migraine mimic, symptomatic migraine, hemicrania continua (Headache 2015;55:313-322) The symptoms of migraine are non-specific and She had seen 2 headache specialists previously. can be present in many other primary and secondary She had been tried on sumatriptan p.o. and subcuta- headache disorders.1,2 Even experienced headache neously, diclofenac powder, ketorolac oral and intra- specialists may be challenged at times when diagnos- muscular, dihydroergotamine nasal spray, and had an ing what appears to be first or worst, new type, occipital nerve block without benefit. Gabapentin migraine status, and chronic migraine. Another diag- and pregabalin did not help. She was placed on indo- nosis may be responsible when physicians use the term methacin 75 mg sustained release once a day for 8 “atypical migraine.” days without benefit. Prednisone 60 mg daily for 10 days did not help.An intravenous dihydroergotamine CASE HISTORIES regimen for 5 days did not help. Case 1.—This 48-year-old woman was seen for a A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mag- third opinion with a 20-year history of only menstrual netic resonance angiogram (MRA) of the brain and headaches always preceded by a visual aura followed cervical spine and magnetic resonance venogram by a generalized throbbing with an intensity of 5–6/10 (MRV) of the brain were negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Decreased Risk of Dementia in Migraine Patients with Traditional Chinese Medicine Use: a Population-Based Cohort Study
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 45), pp: 79680-79692 Clinical Research Paper Decreased risk of dementia in migraine patients with traditional Chinese medicine use: a population-based cohort study Chun-Ting Liu1,*, Bei-Yu Wu1,*, Yu-Chiang Hung1,2,*, Lin-Yi Wang3, Yan-Yuh Lee3, Tsu-Kung Lin4, Pao-Yen Lin5, Wu-Fu Chen6, Jen-Huai Chiang7,8, Sheng-Feng Hsu9,10 and Wen-Long Hu1,11,12,* 1Department of Chinese Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2School of Chinese Medicine for Post Baccalaureate, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 4Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 5Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 6Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 7Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan 8College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 9Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 10Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taipei, Taiwan 11Kaohsiung Medical University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 12Fooyin University College of Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Wen-Long Hu, email: [email protected] Keywords: dementia, migraine, pharmaco-epidemiology, national health insurance research database, Chinese herbal product Received: February 27, 2017 Accepted: June 28, 2017 Published: July 08, 2017 Copyright: Liu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Visual Snow Associated with Migraine Attacks
    Letters RESEARCH LETTER Discussion | Three patients report episodes of VS exclusively at the beginning or during migraine attacks. The description was Episodic Visual Snow Associated identical and matched the definition of VS in VSS except for With Migraine Attacks not being continuous.1,2 In the syndrome-defining study,1 only Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a debilitating disorder charac- patients with continuous VS were included, impeding the iden- terized by continuous visual snow (VS), ie, tiny flickering dots tification of an episodic form. Based on the present case se- in the entire visual field resembling the view of a badly tuned ries, we propose to distinguish between VSS, a debilitating dis- analog television (Figure), plus additional visual symptoms, order characterized by continuous VS and additional visual such as photophobia and palinopsia. There is a high comor- symptoms persisting over years, and eVS, an uncommon self- 1 bidity with migraine and migraine aura. To our knowledge, limiting symptom during migraine attacks. this is the first report of patients with an episodic form of VS The relationship between migraine and VSS is still (eVS), strictly co-occurring with migraine attacks. unresolved.3 Although the severity of VS in VSS does not fluc- tuate in parallel to the migraine cycle,1 the strict co-occurrence Methods | Between January 2016 and December 2017, we saw of eVS and migraine reported here epitomizes a close proxim- 3 patients with eVS and 1934 patients with migraine at our ter- ity.This is in agreement with the clinical picture of migraine being tiary outpatient headache center.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Headacheheadache
    ClusterCluster HeadacheHeadache 1 OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES Describe the clinical features and diagnosis of cluster headache Discuss the pathogenesis of cluster pain and autonomic features Review acute and preventive therapy Overview of new treatment horizons for refractory chronic cluster 2 IHSIHS CLASSIFICATIONCLASSIFICATION Cluster headache n Episodic type (80%) n Chronic type (20%) (Cluster period lasts for more than one year without remission or remission lasts less than 14 days) Episodic Chronic IHS Headache Classification Committee. Cephalalgia. 2004. Although the unique clinical features of cluster headache (CH) have been recognized since the 17th century, the striking periodicity was not articulated until the 1940s. The term “cluster headache” was coined in the 1950s, and since then the International Headache Society (IHS) has identified and classified two major temporal patterns of CH (1). The episodic type (ECH), by far the most common (90%), is characterized by discrete attack and remission phases. The chronic type (CCH) is defined by attacks that occur daily for more than one year without remission or with remission periods lasting less than 14 days. Cluster headache is rare (about 0.4% of the general population), and it predominates in males, although recent studies indicate that the rate in females is rising (2). Onset can occur at any age but usually begins between 30 and 50 years of age (3). In contrast to migraine headache, genetics in cluster headache is not thought to be important, although recent studies have shown a positive family history in about 7% of patients with cluster headache. When compared with prevalence of CH in the general population, first-degree relatives have about a 14-fold increased risk of developing CH.
    [Show full text]
  • Migraine Headache Prophylaxis Hien Ha, Pharmd, and Annika Gonzalez, MD, Christus Santa Rosa Family Medicine Residency Program, San Antonio, Texas
    Migraine Headache Prophylaxis Hien Ha, PharmD, and Annika Gonzalez, MD, Christus Santa Rosa Family Medicine Residency Program, San Antonio, Texas Migraines impose significant health and financial burdens. Approximately 38% of patients with episodic migraines would benefit from preventive therapy, but less than 13% take prophylactic medications. Preventive medication therapy reduces migraine frequency, severity, and headache-related distress. Preventive therapy may also improve quality of life and prevent the progression to chronic migraines. Some indications for preventive therapy include four or more headaches a month, eight or more headache days a month, debilitating headaches, and medication- overuse headaches. Identifying and managing environmental, dietary, and behavioral triggers are useful strategies for preventing migraines. First-line med- ications established as effective based on clinical evidence include divalproex, topiramate, metoprolol, propranolol, and timolol. Medications such as ami- triptyline, venlafaxine, atenolol, and nadolol are probably effective but should be second-line therapy. There is limited evidence for nebivolol, bisoprolol, pindolol, carbamazepine, gabapentin, fluoxetine, nicardipine, verapamil, nimodipine, nifedipine, lisinopril, and candesartan. Acebutolol, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and telmisartan are ineffective. Newer agents target calcitonin gene-related peptide pain transmission in the migraine pain pathway and have recently received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; ​​​how- ever, more studies of long-term effectiveness and adverse effects are needed. The complementary treatments petasites, feverfew, magnesium, and riboflavin are probably effective. Nonpharmacologic therapies such as relaxation training, thermal biofeedback combined with relaxation training, electromyographic feedback, and cognitive behavior therapy also have good evidence to support their use in migraine prevention. (Am Fam Physician. 2019; 99(1):17-24.
    [Show full text]
  • Migraine and Tension Headache Guideline
    Migraine and Tension Headache Guideline Major Changes as of May 2021 .................................................................................................................... 2 Medications Not Recommended for Headache Treatment .......................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Diagnosis Red flag warning signs ........................................................................................................................... 3 Differential diagnosis .............................................................................................................................. 3 Imaging ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Migraine versus tension headache ......................................................................................................... 4 Medication overuse headache ................................................................................................................ 4 Menstruation-related migraine ................................................................................................................ 4 Tension Headache Acute treatment ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Prophylaxis ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Headache and Migraine in Parkinson's Disease
    June 28, 2018 Pan-American /Asian Symposium HEADACHE AND MIGRAINE IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE Keisuke Suzuki Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan COI Disclosure Presenter:Keisuke Suzuki There are no companies, etc. in a relation of conflict of interest requiring disclosure in relation to the presentation Learning objectives Upon completion, participants will be able to Understand the possible role of dopamine in migraine Describe migraine prevalence in Parkinson’s disease Describe changes in migraine severity after the onset of Parkinson’s disease Know the rate of depression and insomnia in Parkinson’s disease patients with migraine Dopamine and migraine Peroutka. Neurology 1997;49:650-656 ”Dopaminergic hypersensitivity” A placebo-controlled study: apomorphine (dopamine agonist) induced a higher number of yawns in migraine patients than in a control group. Del Bene et al, Headache 1994;34:536-8 Central site of action proposed Induced yawning was not blocked by peripheral D2 antagonist, domperidone, but blocked by central D1 or D2 antagonists. Serra et al, Psychopharmacol 1987;91:330-3; Eur J Pharmacol 1986;120:187-92 Peripheral dopamine receptors involved Bromocriptine administration induced an intense hypotensive reaction in migraine patients but not in controls Fanciullacci et al, Headache 1980;20:99-102 Peripheral dopamine antagonist, domperidone, abolished syncopal effect of bromocriptine. Sicuteri et al, Adv Neurol 1982;33:199-208 Dopamine in migraine • When TCC (trigeminocervical complex) is activated, Hypothalamic
    [Show full text]
  • Migraine Pathogenesis
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.47.5.437 on 1 May 1984. Downloaded from Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1984;47:437-442 Occasional review Migraine pathogenesis: the neural hypothesis reexamined JN BLAU From the National Hospitals for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, and Maida Vale, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow and City ofLondon Migraine Clinic, London, UK SUMMARY The hypothesis that migraine is a primary neurological disturbance with secondary vascular manifestations is tested by analysing the five phases of migraine attacks and the eight groups of recognised precipitating factors. Accessory evidence from cerebral blood flow and EEG recordings taken during attacks is also considered. The evidence supports the concept that the sensory cortex and hypothalamus could be initiating sites for migraine attacks, and indicates that a neurological mechanism, suggested by Liveing and Gowers 100 years ago, remains viable and needs to be considered in future research. Protected by copyright. A vascular cause for migraine has been accepted for aspect of the patient. The pallor of the surface must several decades, on the assumption that extracranial be due to contraction of the arteries, and the flush- vasodilatation produced the characteristic throbbing ing of the skin due to their dilatation, and it is headache.' The extracranial hypothesis was chal- assumed that a corresponding condition of the ves- lenged because facial pallor is common during mig- sels of the brain is the cause of the derangement of raine episodes and because patients with temporal functions.... According to the other and alternative arteritis do not vomit or have photophobia.2 Subse- explanation of the disease, the primary derangement quent observations revealed that in 49/50 patients is of nerve-cells of the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Consensus Guidelines On
    General Neurology J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317440 on 14 June 2018. Downloaded from REVIEW Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management Susan P Mollan,1,2 Brendan Davies,3 Nick C Silver,4 Simon Shaw,5 Conor L Mallucci,6,7 Benjamin R Wakerley,8,9 Anita Krishnan,4 Swarupsinh V Chavda,10 Satheesh Ramalingam,10 Julie Edwards,11,12 Krystal Hemmings,13 Michelle Williamson,13 Michael A Burdon,2 Ghaniah Hassan-Smith,1,12 Kathleen Digre,14 Grant T Liu,15 Rigmor Højland Jensen,16 Alexandra J Sinclair1,2,12,17 ► Additional material is ABSTRact contains information that will be of interest to those published online only. To view The aim was to capture interdisciplinary expertise from a in primary care and other healthcare professionals. please visit the journal online large group of clinicians, reflecting practice from across The increasing economic burden of IIH has been (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ 1 2 jnnp- 2017- 317440). the UK and further, to inform subsequent development of highlighted by a number of groups. Clear guid- a national consensus guidance for optimal management ance will help educate the attending doctors to For numbered affiliations see of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). manage these patients appropriately. This will help end of article. Methods Between September 2015 and October reduce the repeat unsolicited emergency hospital 2017, a specialist interest group including neurology, attendances and reduce IIH-related disability. Correspondence to There are a number of ongoing clinical trials in IIH Dr Alexandra J Sinclair, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, ophthalmology, nursing, Metabolic Neurology, Institute primary care doctors and patient representatives (https://www.
    [Show full text]