October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

To appear in the Journal of Mathematics and the Arts Vol. 00, No. 00, Month 20XX, 1–9

Sphericons and D-forms: a crocheted connection

Katherine A. Seatona∗ aDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University VIC 3086, Australia

(Received 00 Month 20XX; final version received 00 Month 20XX)

Sphericons and D-forms are 3D objects created and described by artists, which have separately received attention in the mathematical literature in the last 15 or so years. The attempt to classify a seamed, crocheted form geometrically led to the observation, which appears not to have been previously made explicit, that these objects are related. Instructions to crochet D-forms are given in the Appendix.

Keywords: , D-form, pita form, developable , Ravelry, crochet

AMS Subject Classification: 51M04; 97M80

1. Introduction

In January 2015, a crocheter on the social networking site Ravelry[1] posted images of a coin purse she had made as a Christmas present, and started a discussion thread asking readers of a particular forum if they could help her identify the name of its 3D shape (hereafter termed The Shape). The purse, shown in Figure 1, had been constructed following a pattern[4] by making a flat oval, and attaching a zipper to its edge in such a way that when the zipper closed, the purse was not folded over exactly in half onto itself (flat), but sat up, enclosing an intriguingly-shaped . The crocheter had read the German version[19] of an Ian Stewart column on the sphericon[25], and believed that The Shape might be sort-of-but-not-quite a sphericon. However, the paper templates for making one’s own sphericons provided in [19, 25] have curved edges only, which her oval did not. In fact oval is rather loose a term, and broadly means egg-like. The purse in question had been constructed from a stadium, the 2D shape made from a rectangle and two semi-, as shown in Figure 2. Over the next few weeks, various Ravelry members, including the author of this paper, joined in arXiv:1603.08409v1 [math.HO] 1 Mar 2016 on-line discussion and brain-storming about The Shape. More than 500 of Ravelry’s (admittedly 6 million) members read at least part of the thread (before, as threads do, it wandered off to shapes more generally). Patterns for objects with similar construction were pointed out[6]. As well as the sphericon family, D-forms[8, 22] were mentioned. So, was The Shape one of these, and if so, which was it? The sphericon has been described as ‘[a] solid ... not as widely known as it should be’[27]. An introduction to the history and properties of sphericons and D-forms, and their relatives, thus make up the next two sections of the paper. In the final section, The Shape will be classified, thereby stitching (literally) a connection between sphericons and D-forms.

∗ Email: [email protected]

1 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure 1. Photograph of the coin purse, The Shape, made from a crocheted stadium. Courtesy of Annagret.

r

2r

h

Figure 2. A stadium, a rectangle of length h inserted between two halves of a of radius r.

2. Sphericons: making things out of solids

The sphericon, at least as a mathematical object, came to public attention in Stewart’s Math- ematical Recreations column[25] in 1999. Colin Roberts, a joiner who had enjoyed at school, sent Stewart his creation, after seeing him on television. The column was written shortly after this. Roberts had first made a sphericon from mahogany some thirty years earlier in 1967. Independently, in the early 1980s, an Israeli designer Hirsch submitted a patent application for ‘meander motion’ toys constructed on the same principles[12]. Roberts’ motivation, however, lay in producing a one-surfaced object, with no hole (unlike the well-known M¨obiusstrip). The sphericon can be constructed from a pair of identical of apex angle 90 degrees joined at their bases (a bicone). Cut the bicone in half through the two apices so as to reveal its square cross-section, twist one half through 90 degrees, and then ‘glue’ the square faces together again. Clear diagrams and photos showing this process are plentiful; see for example [17, 19, 25]. Judging from these photos, especially when made of grained wood, it is a beautiful object. It has one continous sinuous[24] surface, and two non-intersecting curved edges, set at right angles. The sphericon rolls in an amusing manner, what Stewart terms ‘a controlled wiggle’[25], the meander motion of Hirsch’s toys[12]. A will roll in a straight line, and a rolls in a circle. The sphericon changes direction as the parts of its surface come into contact with the surface it is rolling on, but on average the motion is in a line. Hence the name sphericon. The sphericon featured next in the monthly Feature Column of the American Mathematical Society[17], wherein the Gaussian curvature was shown to be 4π by considering carefully what happens at its edges and the cone apices, and the hexasphericon was introduced. Phillips found connections between such higher order sphericons (to be introduced below) and his work on mazes[18]. Some particular closed space curves were found to lie on the sphericon surface in [14], and an explicit hybrid function form (in cartesian coordinates) is given. Perhaps not surprisingly, given its origins, wood-turners began experimenting with the spheri- con. A special join, called a paper join, enables the cutting-open process to be done without damage. The bicone can be replaced by any solid of revolution with appropriate cross-section symmetry. Some makers introduced different profiles (producing what they termed femispheres) or non-convex cross-sections (the streptohedrons)[23]. Other makers[24] generated some of the

2 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure 3. The dual sphericon.

convex geometric objects that are classified as the series of N-icons[13]. Sphericons have been made of ceramic, glass, plastic (3D printing) and as metal sculptures, as well as of wood. Think of the bicone as the solid of revolution of a square about its diagonal. Now replace the square by any other N-vertex regular convex polygon, and use one of the symmetry axes to generate a solid of revolution[13]. When N is odd, this axis will run through one vertex and one flat face of the polygon. When N is even, the polygonal cross-section can be rotated about an axis through two opposite vertices or through the centres of two opposing flat faces. For N > 4, different ‘-icons’ can be produced by more than one rotation (in the cut-rotate-reglue process), due to the rotational symmetries of the cross-section; these may be completely different or may come in right- and left-hand pairs. A full classification of the family of solids requires one to kπ specify k ∈ N where N is the rotation (in radians) between cutting and regluing, termed the twist in [13]. Two special cases will now be considered: The dual sphericon Rotating a square about an axis through a pair of opposing flat faces results in a of equal height and diameter. Applying the cutting and twisting process, an object with two surfaces and one continuous edge is produced, as illustrated in Figure 3; this object is dual to the original sphericon (two edges and one surface). Springett described this object, which wood-turners term side-cut, as being ‘rather unexciting’[23]1. In the cutting process, four semicircles are produced, which are then joined smoothly to the sides of the cylinder. The paper template for this object consists of not one stadium, but two. When this solid is rolled, it will come to rest on a flat semi-circle. It has two surfaces, and thus provides a possible two-sided dice. Indeed, such dice — and various (N, k)-icons — are available from 3D printing artists. The trisphericon A single cone may be created as the solid of revolution of an equilateral triangle, the N = 3 case. It can be cut to produce a triangular cross-section. When one half is rotated through 60 degrees and the form reglued, a self-dual solid with one curved surface, one S-shaped edge and 2 vertices is produced. Following a similar argument to [25] we can establish what the paper template for this object is (Figure 4). This object has also been called the ‘kleines sphericon’[19], the ‘conicon’[13] and the ‘equilaticon’. While ‘one-sided dice’ based on the M¨obius band are available to purchase, and the g¨omb¨ochas been suggested as a more dice-like alternative, the trisphericon has the desirable features of having no hole, and of coming to rest when rolled, sitting stably on one of its semi-circular elements after a wiggly journey. More generally, the N-icons can always be considered as formed by cutting, twisting and N reglueing a solid made of b 2 c sections of cones (possibly including a cone with apex at infinity, a cylinder). In Kaufman’s study, he finds that the N-icons for odd N are self-dual and the N-icons for even N have dual forms, generated by the two different symmetry axes[13]. Two stadiums may be present in the dual N-icons, as we can see from the four semicircles created in

1It will become apparent that this author does not share this opinion.

3 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

2r

2r

2r

Figure 4. The template for a trisphericon. It is formed from two quarter-circles of radius 2r and two semi-circles, of radius r.

the cutting process. New features arise as N increases, such as continuous surfaces surrounding other surfaces[13] — think of a velodrome, with the sloped surface around the centre. It is worthwhile, at this point, if you have resisted the temptation so far, to make a sphericon from paper or light card using templates such as those of P¨oppe[19]. (Indeed, the crocheter mentioned in the Introduction had done exactly this with her family, which is why she was familiar with them.) Of course, you will not have a solid sphericon; you will have the surface and will manipulate and tape it to enclose a volume shaped like the solids.

3. D-forms: making things out of sheets

The D-form entered mathematics in a similar way to the sphericon — but this time from design. The British designer and inventor Tony Wills says they came to him in a dream, as a way of expanding his working vocabulary of forms[28]. Wills has used D-forms in street architecture (benches, bins, bollards)[29]. They are 3D objects formed when the boundaries of two 2D shapes of equal perimeter length are joined. The 2D shapes need to be made of a material that does not stretch or shear; a typical cushion is not a D-form! Two circles cannot produce a (non-trivial) D-form, but two identical offset ellipses do, as seen in Figure 5. The cross-section of the object produced using two ellipses with their major axes set at right angles looks like the letter capital D. (D is for dream, this cross-section and also for developable surfaces[22].) As the shapes are joined, they inform each other as to how their joined boundary should curve in space. Wills observed that choosing different points on the boundaries of the 2D shapes to start the seam between them changes the resulting D-form[5, 28]. He investigated joining the boundary of a circle to that of a square (i.e. not a smooth boundary) producing an object he termed a Squaricle, and also used non-convex shapes. Baseball construction, as described in [26] is an example of D-forming that long pre-dates Wills; two flat pieces of leather have been designed (by trial and error initially) to be joined in such a way that their seam lies on a sphere. The initial 3D form is not spherical — the leather is subsequently stretched over a hard spherical core. D-forms are developable surfaces, in that they can be cut open and flattened, without creasing, to be planar[20, 21], although they have been described thus far as being formed by the reverse process. Developable surfaces have the advantage for designers, artists and builders that they can be constructed from rolled sheet metal; even ships and airplanes are made this way[2]. D-forms have been observed to have much in common with various sculptural works[21]. Predicting in advance what the D-form will look like, and hence what 2D shapes to use, is not easy, though computational methods (based on meshes) have been developed[11].

4 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure 5. A D-form made from two ellipses. Courtesy of Madeleine Shepherd.

As with the sphericon, making a paper model, right now, will help you understand how D- forms evolve in front of you and how beautiful they can be. There are templates at [3] and [5] — or you can easily cut your own using a double layer of paper. D-forms were introduced to the mathematical world by Wills and Sharp before the publication of [21, 22]. Questions [20, p. 418] regarding their creasing, and whether or not a D-form is always the convex hull of a space curve, were posed in 2001 and addressed in 2007, with the boundaries of the 2D shapes restricted to being convex[7]. Also in [7], the concept of a pita-form was introduced. A pita-form is defined to be the 3D shape obtained by glueing the boundary of a single convex 2D shape to itself. Demaine returned to the open questions surrounding D-forms with a different co-author in 2010. In [8], it is shown that both D-forms and pita-forms are the convex hull of their seams, that D-forms are always crease-free away from the seam, but that a pita-form may have at most one crease, between the two endpoints of its seam. (Of course, ‘crease’ has to be defined a bit more carefully (in terms of differentiability properties) than by simply looking at a paper model, as this initially led in [7] to the proposition that pita-forms also might never have creases.) Also introduced were seam forms, a natural generalization to more flat pieces than two.

4. Stitching it up: making things out of fibre

As mentioned in the Introduction, both sphericons and D-forms were suggested as describing The Shape (Figure 1), formed from a crocheted stadium, lined so that there is some rigidity to the surface and no shearing or stretching, before the zipper is added. Simply, it is a pita-form, made from a stadium. Prior to [7], D-forms made using stadiums seem not to have been mentioned or visualised. Authors moved directly from dismissing the circle to trying out the ellipse. Perhaps this springs from the fact that the cone is probably the most well-known [21], so conic sections seemed a natural constituent for D-forms (despite the fact that there is no formula for the perimeter of an ellipse). Of course, a stadium has a perimeter that can be calculated as precisely as one might wish: 2h + 2πr. This author has experimented with making various pita-forms from crocheted stadiums, varying the ratio between the rectangle’s height and the radius of the semi-circles, and with different starting points for the seam (Figure 6). Tips for making your own from fibre are given in Appendix A. But does The Shape belong on the sphericon family tree also? As should have become clear from Section 2, an N-icon’s surface is subject to symmetry, side length and angle constraints arising from its construction from a regular 3D object. What if one

5 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure 6. Various pita-forms constructed from stadiums by the author, by the method outlined in Appendix A. They each have the same value of h. The first two are identical apart from seam starting point. The third has a larger r value.

Figure 7. One is regular and one is irregular, but these are both hexagons.

steps back from these constraints and origins? Could not the stadium (Figure 2) be regarded as the outcome of relaxing conditions which led to Figure 4? Just as the two shapes in Figure 7 are hexagons, one regular and one irregular, The Shape, with its one surface and one S-shaped seam between two distinct endpoints, could be termed an “irregular trisphericon”. To put this around the other way, the trisphericon is a pita-form, but formed from a 2D shape which is not convex (Figure 4). Moving on from the original question that motivated this investigation, what of a general rela- tionship between the sphericon family, and pita-, D- and seam forms? A kinship is foreshadowed in the works of the Turkish artist Ilhan Koman. Consider the piece called Rolling Lady which dates from 1983 [2, 15]. It consists of two bicones (four developable surfaces) interlocked at right angles in such a way as to roll. At its elegant heart lie two perpendicular circles, just as two perpendicular edges, circle sectors, are a striking feature of the sphericon. (In this article, the connection of the sphericon to the rollers and wobblers of [9], and to the , has not been explored, being somewhat tangential to the identification question under consideration.) Let’s look at the shape that did not much interest Springett, the dual sphericon (Figure 3). This is precisely a D-form obtained from two stadiums, with h = πr. This inspired the crocheted piece D-based shown in Figure 8. For some other values of N and k also, the (N, k)-icons are very particular cases of pita-forms, D-forms or seam forms, with the convexity condition on the constituent flat pieces of the surface, but not the final 3D shape, relaxed in some cases. (To be convinced, look again at the images at [13], in the light of Section 3.) As far as can be judged from the published literature, this connection has not been explicitly stated previously, though presentations on sphericons and D-forms have been made at the same conference [2, 23, 28]! This may be because of the very different geography of their birthplaces, in the realm of solids and of surfaces respectively. It seems to have taken crochet fibre to link them.

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge the contributors to the thread How would you call this shape? in the Woolly Thoughts forum of Ravelry, in particular Annagret, bevbh, MadeleineS, soyloquesoy and

6 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure 8. D-based, a crochet figure by the author, February 2015.

Woolhelmina for their inspiration of this piece, and for pooling their collective wisdom about fibre arts and mathematics. Thanks also to Jane Pitkethly for creating the line drawings and to the fibre artists who permitted photos of their work to be used.

References

[1] About us, Ravelry website; available at http://www.ravelry.com/about. [2] T. Akg¨un,A. Koman and E. Akleman, Developable Sculptural Forms of Ilhan Koman, in Bridges London: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, London, UK, 4–8 August 2006, The Bridges Organization, pp. 343-350. Available at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2006/bridges2006- 343.html. [3] L.C. Bardos, D-forms website; available at http://www.cutoutfoldup.com/1602-d-forms.php. [4] Cherry Berry Crochet, Coins purse or sewing necessaire crochet pattern; available at http://www.ravelry.com/patterns/library/coins-purse-or-sewing-necessaire-crochet-pattern. [5] P. Bourke, dForms website; available at http://paulbourke.net/geometry/dform/. [6] F. Brown, Zippy Strip; available at http://www.ravelry.com/patterns/library/zippy-strip. [7] E.D. Demaine and J. O’Rourke, Geometric Folding Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2007. [8] E.D. Demaine and G. N. Price, Generalized D-forms have no spurious creases, Discrete Comput Geom 43 (2010), pp. 179-186. [9] C. Engelhardt, and C. Ucke, Zwei-Scheiben-Roller, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlicher Unter- richt 48 (1995), pp. 259-263. [10] D. Henderson and D. Taimi¸na, Crocheting the hyperbolic plane, The Mathematical Intelligencer 23 (2001), pp. 17-28. [11] O.¨ G¨onen,E. Akleman and V. Srinivasan, Modeling D-Forms, in Bridges Donostia: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, San Sebastian, Spain, 24– 27 July 2007, The Bridges Organization, pp. 209-216. Available at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2007/bridges2007-209.html. [12] D.H. Hirsch, Patent no. 59720: A device for generating a meander motion (1980); available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patent59720-claims.pdf and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patent59720-drawings.pdf. [13] R. Kaufman, The N-icon study website; available at http://www.interocitors.com/polyhedra/ [14] C. Kimberling and P. J. C. Moses, Closed space curves made from circles on polyhedra, Journal for Geometry and Graphics 15 (2011), pp. 29-43. [15] I. Koman,Rolling Lady (1983). Image available at http://www.koman.org/work/work 1983rollinglady.html [16] H.M. Osinga and B. Krauskopf, Crocheting the Lorentz manifold, The Mathematical Intelligencer 26, (2004), pp. 25-37. [17] A. Phillips, The differential geometry of the sphericon, Feature Column of the American Mathe-

7 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

matical Society, October 1999. Available at http://www.ams.org/samplings/feature-column/fcarc- sphericon1 [18] A. Phillips, Meander mazes on polysphericons, in The Visual Mind II, M. Emmer (Ed.), MIT Press,Cambridge, MA, 2005 and http://www.ams.org/samplings/feature-column/fcarc-octo-cretan. [19] C. P¨oppe and I. Stewart, Der Kegel mit dem Dreh, Spektrum der Wissenschaft 7 (2000), pp. 114-116. Available at http://www.spektrum.de/magazin/der-kegel-mit-dem-dreh/826587 and http://www.wissenschaft-online.de/spektrum/themen/sphericon-text.html [20] H. Pottmann and J. Wallner, Computational Line Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. [21] J. Sharp, D-Forms and developable surfaces, in Renaissance Banff: Mathematics, Music, Art, Culture, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 31 July–3 August 2005, The Bridges Organization, pp. 121–128. Available at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-121.html. [22] J. Sharp, D-forms: Surprising New 3-D Forms From Flat Curved Shapes, Tarquin Publications, Hertfordshire, UK, 2009. [23] D. Springett, Streptohedrons (Twisted polygons), in Bridges London: Mathematics, Music, Art, Ar- chitecture, Culture, London, UK, 4–8 August 2006, The Bridges Organization, pp. 285–292. Available at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2006/bridges2006-285.html. [24] Steve’s sphericon saga website; available at http://www.mathias.org/steve/sphericons/. [25] I. Stewart, Cone with a twist, Sci. Amer. 281(1999), pp.116-117. [26] R.B. Thompson, Designing a baseball cover, Coll. Math. J. 29 (1998), pp.48-61. [27] E.W. Weisstein, Sphericon, MathWorld — A Wolfram Web Resource. Available at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sphericon.html. [28] T. Wills, D-Forms: 3D forms from two 2D sheets, in Bridges London: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, London, UK, 4–8 August 2006, The Bridges Organization, pp. 503–510 [29] T. Wills D-Form street furniture website; available at http://www.wills-watson.co.uk/portfolio- item/d-form-street-furniture/.

Appendix A. Make your own dual sphericon or pita-form

To crochet a stadium is not as daunting a task as making the Lorentz Manifold[16] or even a hyperbolic plane[10]. To make a dual sphericon, you will need to crochet two identical pieces. To make a pita-form, you need only one. Any (free or purchased) non-lacy pattern for an ‘oval’ will suffice. This could be a pattern for a rug or table mat. ‘Oval’ is used in craft forums (and daily conversation) for just about anything which is not symmetric enough to be a circle and not angular enough to be a rectangle, and even for 3D forms, so check to see that it is actually going to produce a stadium (Figure 2). To control the size of the rectangular part, vary the length of the starting chain and, correspondingly, the straight sections in subsequent rounds. The diameter of the semi-circular parts depends on the stitch height and the number of rounds completed. You will need yarn, a crochet hook, a sewing needle and scissors (only to cut threads, not to cut the surface!). I have chosen to make my models so far using plarn (plastic yarn, made by recycling shopping bags) which produces quite a stiff fabric even for treble (UK) stitches. Following the advice in [10] and using acrylic yarn and a smaller-than-usual hook to produce a dense fabric in double (UK) crochet would also work. If you decide to stuff your models, use just enough stuffing that they do not collapse, and not enough to distort them. My models are quite small, but larger models will probably need stuffing. Another method to get around the inherent stretchiness and floppiness of most knitted or crocheted fabric is to use felted knitting, as seen in Figure 5. I closed my models by overstitching, pulling only tight enough to close the seam, again to avoid distortion. For the dual sphericon, begin by joining the midpoint of a semicircle on one stadium to the midpoing of the straight side of the other, and then join stitch by stitch, until the two pieces are joined. For the pita-form, you can pick any starting point (apart from the exact midpoints) for your seam. It’s fun to make several, using different starting points. Interesting objects are obtained for h  r such as those created using the pattern Zippy

8 October 4, 2021 Journal of Mathematics and the Arts sphericonsdformsarxiv

Figure A1. Zippy Strip. Courtesy of Frankie Brown.

Figure A2. A stadium of radius r = 1.5 cm and h = 50 cm is seamed to itself. While it begins as does the Zippy Strip, it develops a different shape as the final part of the seam is made.

Strip[6]. In this case, the stadium continues to wrap around itself, with the seam forming a spiral in space (rather than an S). Again, the starting point of the seam will determine the final outcome. Some makers describe a flattish purse (Figure A1), while others obtain something more “pyramidal”. In making one myself, I observed that remarkable feature of D-forms, that they continue to develop right up until they are closed. This development is captured in Figure A2.

9