DOCSLIB.ORG

Heidi B. Harley Curriculum Vitae, 2014 Dept

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heidi B. Harley Curriculum Vitae, 2014 Dept 1 Heidi B. Harley Curriculum Vitae, 2014 Dept. of Linguistics (o) (520) 626-3554 University of Arizona (fax) (520) 626-6897 P.O. 210028 [email protected] Tucson, AZ 85721-0028 CHRONOLOGY OF EDUCATION: 1995: Doctor of Philosophy, Linguistics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1991: Bachelor of Arts, Linguistics and English. Memorial University of Newfoundland CHRONOLOGY OF EMPLOYMENT: Long-term appointments Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, 2010-present Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, 2005-2010 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, 1999-2005 Postdoctoral Fellow, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science (NSF), University of Pennsylvania, 1997-1999 Postdoctoral Fellow, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, University of Pennsylvania, 1996-1997 Maître de langue, Université Charles de Gaulle (Lille III), Lille, France, October 1995- June 1996 Summer and short-term appointments Professor of Linguistics (0.2 FTE), University of Ulster, Jan-Dec 2013 Visiting Research Professor University of Ulster, Humanities Research Institute, Summer 2011 Visiting Research Professor University of Ulster, Humanities Research Institute, Summer 2007 Assistant Research Social Scientist, Cognitive Science Program University of Arizona, 1999-2005 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics Harvard University, January-June 2005 Temporary Lecturer in Linguistics, Comparative Philology and General Linguistics Oxford University, May-June 2004 Program affiliations Faculty Member, Cognitive Science Program University of Arizona, 1999-present Faculty member, Second Language Acquisition and Teaching GIDP University of Arizona, 2000-present Faculty member, Joint Anthropology/Linguistics Program University of Arizona, 1999-present 2 HONORS AND AWARDS Graduate and Professional Education Teaching and Mentoring Award, Graduate College, University of Arizona, March, 2011. Earl H. Carroll Magellan Circle Fellow, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, August 2010. Memorial University of Newfoundland A.C. Hunter Prize in English, 1991, first in graduating class PUBLICATIONS/CREATIVE ACTIVITY Scholarly books/monographs In print: Scholarly works Carnie, A. and H. Harley (eds) (2014). xxx. Leading Linguists, XXX: Routledge. Carnie, A., H. Harley and M. Willie, (eds) (2003) Formal Approaches to Functional Phenomena: Papers in honor of Eloise Jelinek, Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Harley 45%) Carnie, A., H. Harley and S. Dooley-Colberg, (eds) (2004) The Syntax of V-initial Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Folli, R. and H. Harley (eds). (2008). Special Issue on Perfectivity and Telicity. Lingua 118.11 H. Harley, R. Folli and B. Jensen, (eds), (2007), Special Issue on Aspect and Aktionsart, The Nordic Journal of Linguistics 30.2 Lewis, W., S. Karimi, H. Harley and S. Farrar, (eds). (2009). Time and Again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics. In honor of D. Terence Langendoen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Carnie, A. and H. Harley (eds.) 2014. Pronouns, presuppositions and hierarchies: The Work of Eloise Jelinek in Context. New York: Routledge Textbook Harley, H. (2006) English Words: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. Working paper volumes edited: Carnie, A. and H. Harley (1994) Papers on Phonology and Morphology, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL (Harley 50%) Harley, H. and C. Phillips (1994) The Morphology-Syntax Connection, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL (Harley 50%) 3 Harley, H. (1998) Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL Pylkkänen, L., A. van Hout and H. Harley (1999) Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35, Cambridge, MA:MITWPL (Harley 30%) Chapters in scholarly books/monographs A: Original research, peer-reviewed papers Harley, H. (1998) "You're having me on: Aspects of have", in J. Guéron and A. Zribi-Hertz, eds., La grammaire de la possession, pp. 195-226. Paris: Université Paris X - Nanterre. Andrew Carnie, H. Harley and E. Pyatt (2000), "VSO Order as Raising to Comp", in A. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle, eds., The Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, pp, 39-60 Oxford University Press (Harley 40%) Harley, H. and Rolf Noyer (2000) "Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon", in Bert Peeters, ed., The Lexicon/Encyclopaedia Interface, 349-374, Amsterdam:Elsevier Press. (Harley 50%) Harley, H and Elizabeth Ritter (2002) "Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry," in H. Weise and H. Simon, eds. Pronouns: Grammar and Representation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 23-39. (Harley 50%) Folli, Raffaella. and Harley, H. (2004) “Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English,” in Roumyana Slabakova and Paula Kempchinsky, eds., Aspectual Inquiries, 95-120. Dordrecht: Kluwer (Harley 50%) Harley, H. (2005) “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English,” in Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport, eds., The Syntax of Aspect, 42-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Folli, R. and H. Harley. (2006). “Benefactives aren’t Goals in Italian”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2004, ed. by Jenny Doetjes and Paz Gonzales, pp. 121–142, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Harley, H. (2008). “When is a syncretism more than a syncretism? Impoverishment, metasyncretism, and underspecification,” in Phi Theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, edited by David Adger, Susana Bejar and Daniel Harbour. Oxford: OUP. 251-294. Harley, H. (2008) "The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings." In Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, ed. by. Thaïs Cristófaro Silva and Heliana Mello. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG, pp 45-84. Harley, H. (2008) “On the causative construction,” Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, edited by Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito. pp. 20-53, Oxford: OUP. Harley, H. (2009). "The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP". Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization, edited by Monika Rathert and 4 Anastasia Giannadikou. Oxford: OUP, pp. 320-342. Harley, H. (2009). "Compounding in Distributed Morphology." Oxford Handbook of Compounding, edited by Rochelle Lieber and Pavel Stekauer. Oxford: OUP, pp. 129- 144. Harley, H. (2011). "Affixation and the Mirror Principle." In Interfaces in Linguistics, ed. by Raffaella Folli and Christiane Ullbricht, 166-186. Oxford: OUP Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes and H. Harley. (2010) "Dos tipos de base verbal en Hiaki (yaqui)". In Análisi lingüístico: enfoques sincrónico, diacrónico e interdisciplinario, ed. by Rosa María Ortiz Ciscomani, p. 97-128. Editorial Unison, Hermosillo, Son., Mexico Harley, H. (2012). Lexical decomposition in modern generative grammar. In Handbook of Compositionality, edited by Wolfram Hinzen, Markus Werning and Edouard Machery, p. 328-350. Oxford: OUP. Haugen, J, M. Leyva, Mercedes Tubino and Heidi Harley. (2012). "Wo'i Wakila / Skinny Coyote—A Hiaki (Yaqui) Narrative," In Inside Dazzling Mountains: Contemporary. Translations of Southwest Native Verbal Arts, edited by David Kozak, p. 277-298. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press. Harley, H. (2012). "Semantics in Distributed Morphology." In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Volume 3. C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner, eds., pp 2151-2172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Harley, H. (2013). Getting morphemes in order: Merger, Affixation and Head-movement. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Cheng and Norbert Corver (eds), Oxford: OUP. pp. 44-74 Harley, H, and Mercedes Tubino Blanco. (2013) Cycles, vocabulary items and stem forms in Hiaki. In O. Matushansky and A. Marantz, eds., Distributed Morphology Today. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 117-134 Haugen, J. and H. Harley. (2013) On the implications of head-marking inflection for the architecture of grammatical theory: Evidence from reduplication and compounding in Hiaki (Yaqui). In A. Fountain, M. Miyashita, D. Cole and S. Bischoff, (eds), The persistence of language: Constructing and confronting the past and present in the voices of Jane H. Hill. pp 133-174 Amsterdam: John Benjamins Harley, H and M. Stone. (2013). The ‘No Agent Idioms’ hypothesis. In R. Folli, C. Sevdali and R. Truswell, eds., Syntax and its limits. pp 251-273 Oxford: OUP Harley, H., Mercedes Tubino Blanco, Jason Haugen. (2014) Affixal light verbs and complex predicates in Hiaki. In Current issues in complex predicate research, edited by Hideki Kishimoto and Yoko Yumuto. 257-290. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Jelinek, Eloise and H. Harley. 2014. Impersonal agreement in a non-agreement language: The Hiaki impersonal construction. In A. Carnie and H. Harley (eds.) Pronouns, presuppositions and hierarchies: The work of Eloise Jelinek in context. 375-388. New York: Routledge B. Copley and H. Harley. (2014). Eliminating causative entailments with the force-theoretic framework. In Causation in language, Bridget Copley and Fabienne Martin (eds), Oxford: OUP. 120-151 5 Harley, H., Mercedes Tubino Blanco and Jason Haugen. Forthcoming. Locality conditions on suppletive verbs in Hiaki. To appear in The morphosyntax-phonology connection: Locality and directionality at the interface, edited by Vera Gribanova and Stephanie Shih. Oxford: OUP. Bobaljik,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thinking Like a Linguist Jordan B
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-18392-6 — Thinking like a Linguist Jordan B. Sandoval, Kristin E. Denham Frontmatter More Information Thinking like a Linguist This is an engaging introduction to the study of language for undergraduate or beginning graduate students, aimed especially at those who would like to continue further linguistic study. It introduces students to analytical thinking about language but goes beyond existing texts to show what it means to think like a scientist about language, through the exploration of data and interactive problem sets. A key feature of this text is its flexibility. With its focus on foundational areas of linguistics and scientific analysis, it can be used in a variety of course types, with instructors using it alongside other information or texts as appropriate for their own courses of study. The text can also serve as a supplementary text in other related fields (speech and hearing sciences, psychology, education, computer science, anthropology, and others) to help learners in these areas better understand how linguists think about and work with language data. No prerequisites are necessary. While each chapter often references content from the others, the three central chapters, on sound, structure, and meaning, may be used in any order. Jordan B. Sandoval is Assistant Professor of Linguistics at Western Washington University in Bellingham, WA. She received her BA in Linguistics from Western Washington University and her PhD from the University of Arizona in 2008. Her research interests include orthographic influence on lexical representations, language and iden- tity, and second language phonological acquisition pedagogy. Kristin E. Denham is Professor of Linguistics at Western Washington University.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation
    Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Rachel Steindel Burdin ∼6 6 Graduate Program in Linguistics The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Professor Brian D. Joseph, Advisor Professor Cynthia G. Clopper Professor Donald Winford c Rachel Steindel Burdin, 2016 Abstract Intonation has long been noted as a salient feature of American Jewish English speech (Weinreich, 1956); however, there has not been much systematic study of how, exactly Jewish English intonation is distinct, and to what extent Yiddish has played a role in this distinctness. This dissertation examines the impact of Yiddish on Jewish English intonation in the Jewish community of Dayton, Ohio, and how features of Yiddish intonation are used in Jewish English. 20 participants were interviewed for a production study. The participants were balanced for gender, age, religion (Jewish or not), and language background (whether or not they spoke Yiddish in addition to English). In addition, recordings were made of a local Yiddish club. The production study revealed differences in both the form and function in Jewish English, and that Yiddish was the likely source for that difference. The Yiddish-speaking participants were found to both have distinctive productions of rise-falls, including higher peaks, and a wider pitch range, in their Yiddish, as well as in their English produced during the Yiddish club meetings. The younger Jewish English participants also showed a wider pitch range in some situations during the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Usage and Identity of Somali Males in America Ali Hassan St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in English Department of English 12-2017 "Where Did You Leave the Somali Language?" Language Usage and Identity of Somali Males in America Ali Hassan St. Cloud State University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds Recommended Citation Hassan, Ali, ""Where Did You Leave the Somali Language?" Language Usage and Identity of Somali Males in America" (2017). Culminating Projects in English. 106. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds/106 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in English by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Where did you leave the Somali Language?” Language usage and identity of Somali Males in America by Ali Hassan A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in English: Teaching English as a Second Language December, 2017 Thesis Committee: Michael Schwartz, Chairperson Choonkyong Kim Rami Amiri 2 Abstract Research in second language teaching and learning has many aspects to focus on, but this paper will focus on the sociolinguistic issues related to language usage and identity. Language usage is the lens that is used to understand the identity of Somali males in America. Language usage in social contexts gives us the opportunity to learn the multiple identities of Somali males in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of Linguistics
    Deep Learning for Natural Language Processing Essentials of linguistics Marco Kuhlmann Department of Computer and Information Science This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. What is linguistics? • Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and in particular the relationship between language form and language meaning. Different languages have different words for the animal ‘cat’. • Tis relationship is in principle an arbitrary one – the same word can mean different things to different people. semiotic arbitrariness (Ferdinand de Saussure, 1857–1913) • Besides form and meaning, another important subject of study for linguistics is how language is used in context. Languages of the world Oceania 7M Africa Oceania 887M 1 313 Europe Africa 1720M 2 144 Europe 287 Americas 51M Americas 1 061 Asia Ethnologue Asia 3980M 2 294 Languages by region of origin Population by region of origin from taken Data Levels of linguistic description pragmatics semantics analyse syntax generate morphology phonology Levels of linguistic description pragmatics semantics analyse syntax generate morphology phonology Phonology • Phonology studies the sound systems of human languages, that is, how sounds are organised and used. • For example, Japanese speakers who learn English as a second language have difficulty in hearing and producing the sounds /r/ and /l/ correctly because in Japanese, these are one sound. right/light, arrive/alive • Phonology is different from phonetics, which is concerned with the production, transmission and perception of sounds. Levels of linguistic description pragmatics semantics analyse syntax generate morphology phonology Words consist of morphemes • Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units of language. Morpheme+s are the small+est mean+ing+ful unit+s of language.
    [Show full text]
  • NINE Toward Progress in Theories of Language Sound Structure MARK LIBERMAN
    NINE Toward Progress in Theories of Language Sound Structure MARK LIBERMAN 9.1. Introduction The theme of this chapter is a crucial redundancy in the traditional organization of phonological theories. Serious consideration of this redundancy supports radical simplification of the theory. In technical terms, allophonic variation can be treated in two different ways: first, as a mapping from symbols to symbols, via phonological rules or constraints; or second, as a mapping from symbols to signals, via principles of phonetic realization. Careful examination of specific cases of allophonic variation generally supports (and never seems to refute) a mode of description of the second type, in which structured phonological representations are mapped onto classes of phonetic trajectories. We should therefore consider the null hypothesis: a theory that entirely eliminates the symbolic treatment of allophonic variation and makes postlexical representations subject to direct phonetic interpretation, without any intervening symbol manipulation, whether by rules or by constraints. This leaves us with four well-motivated (indeed unavoidable) tools for dealing with sound-structure patterns: 1. Phonological inventory: the set of available phonological elements and structures. 2. Lexical entries: the phonological spelling of whatever entities are listed in the lexicon: roots, affixes, morphological templates, words, phrases. 3. Allomorphy: alternative lexical pronunciations, whether conditioned by morphological features and morphological or phonological context, or in (linguistically) free variation. 4. Phonetic interpretation: the mapping between symbols (from 1 to 3) and signals. And we assume, following Liberman and Pierrehumbert (1984) and many others, that patterns of phonetic interpretation are variably conditioned by structured phonological representations, as well as by rhetorical, attitudinal, and physiological variables, in ways that can be specific to particular language varieties and even particular individual speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • G-Dropping” in American English Using Forced Alignment Jiahong Yuan 1, Mark Liberman 2 University of Pennsylvania 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected]
    Automatic Detection of “g-dropping” in American English Using Forced Alignment Jiahong Yuan 1, Mark Liberman 2 University of Pennsylvania 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected] Abstract—This study investigated the use of forced alignment Previous studies on “g-dropping” have relied on for automatic detection of “g-dropping” in American English impressionistic coding of the variable. Although it is a (e.g., walkin'). Two acoustic models were trained, one for -in' and relatively easy task for native speakers to manually classify the other for -ing. The models were added to the Penn Phonetics “g-dropping” [11], it is expensive, inconsistent and Lab Forced Aligner, and forced alignment will choose the more impractical when we move on from analysing small datasets probable pronunciation from the two alternatives. The agreement rates between the forced alignment method and native to thousands of hours of speech that are now openly available. English speakers ranged from 79% to 90%, which were In this study we investigate the use of forced alignment for comparable to the agreement rates among the native speakers automatic classification of ‘g-dropping’. We evaluate the (79% - 96%). The two variations of pronunciation not only method by comparing the results with native speakers’ manual differed in their nasal codas, but also – and even more so – in coding. Finally, we explore the acoustic difference between their vowel quality. This is shown by both the KL-divergence the two variations (-in’ and -ing) through both computing the between the two models, and that native Mandarin speakers divergence between the two models, and comparing native performed poorly on classification of “g-dropping”.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu’S Distinction in a Menu Corpus
    Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu’s Distinction in a Menu Corpus Dan Jurafsky, Victor Chahuneau, Bryan R. Routledge, and Noah A. Smith 10.18.16 Peer-Reviewed By: Nathalie Cooke & Anon. Clusters: Food Article DOI: 10.22148/16.007 Dataverse DOI: 10.7910/DVN/QMLCPD Journal ISSN: 2371-4549 Cite: Dan Jurafsky, Victor Chahuneau, Bryan R. Routledge, and Noah A. Smith, “Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu’s Distinction in a Menu Corpus,”Cultural Analytics Oct. 18, 2016. DOI: 10.22148/16.007 Food is a core element of culture, whose link with identity and socio-economic class has made it an important area of cultural research. 1 In his ground-breaking study, Pierre Bourdieu noted that “oppositions similar in structure to those found in cultural practices also appear in eating habits.” 2 His work established deep associations linking food culture, and taste more generally, with social class and other aspects of identity, demonstrating the economic and social determinants of taste and their role in representing distinctions, differences between groups. 1This work was supported in part by a research grant from Google, and by the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. We are grateful for very helpful suggestions from David Bamman, Mark Liberman, and the anonymous reviewers, and to the New York Public Library for their generosity in making the Buttolph menu collection available to the public. 2Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Richard Nice (Harvard University Press, 1984). 1 Dan Jurafsky et al.
    [Show full text]
  • James W. Pennebaker January 2021
    James W. Pennebaker January 2021 Department of Psychology University of Texas at Austin 1 University Station A8000 Austin, TX 78712 512-232-2781 E-mail address: [email protected] Webpage: https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/psychology/faculty/pennebak Education 1973-1977 University of Texas, Austin, Texas, Ph.D. in psychology 1970-1972 Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, Florida, B.A. with honors 1968-1970 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Positions 2009-present Regents Centennial Liberal Arts Professor of Psychology 2016-2018 Executive Director of Project 2021 and Special Advisor to the Provost for Educational Innovation, University of Texas at Austin 2005-2014 Chair, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 2005-2009 Barbara Bush Professor of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 2005-2010 International Professor of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, UK 2004-2005 Associate Chair, Department of Psychology 1997-present Professor of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 1995-1997 Chair, Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University 1987-1997 Professor of Psychology, Southern Methodist University 1983-1987 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University 1982-1983 Polygraph unit instructor, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Quantico, Virginia 1977-1983 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia Honors 2021 William James Fellows Award, Association for Psychological Science 2016 APA Distinguished Contributions
    [Show full text]
  • Example: Phone App for Height Estimation from the Speech Signal
    LINGUISTICS FOR EVERYONE - Links to Resources LFE ad hoc committee, Fall 2014-Spring 2015, B. Pearson & J. Maling, co-chairs (committee information at end) Posted on http://www.umass.edu/aae/bp_refs.htm#present for live links Source Participants/ title link comment I Inspirations, Models of Informal Science NRC Surrounded by Science http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_072091 learning in informal environments PNAS The Science of Communicating Sciencehttp://www.pnas.org/content/111/Supplement_4.toc 16 September 2014; Vol. 111, No. Supplement 4 AAAS Annual meeting 2013: http://www.aaas.org/page/communicating-science-seminar-annual-meeting-2013full video recording 2014: http://www.aaas.org/page/2014-annual-meeting-communicating-science-seminar Alan Alda/Stony Brook http://www.centerforcommunicatingscience.org/ Center for Communicating Science http://www.centerforcommunicatingscience.org/the-flame-challenge-2/ Flame Challenge (explaining science to 11yr-old) WBUR Rise of Pop Science ("explainer videos")http://www.wbur.org/npr/257552199/hot-on-youtube-videos-about-video-games-and-science-too NSF VIZZIES (annual) http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/scivis/dates.jsp Dance your Dissertation http://gonzolabs.org/dance/ 2014 winners announced 11/3 NYT Flora Lichtman, Sharon Shattuck http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/animated-life-seeing-the-invisible.html?ribbon-ad-idx=7&src=me&module=Ribbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Most%20Emailed&pgtype=article&_r=1Cool animation on Leeuwenhoek, II.
    [Show full text]
  • Extris, Extris Arnold M. Zwicky, Stanford University July 2006 for at Least 35 Years, English Speakers Have Been Producing Sente
    Extris, extris Arnold M. Zwicky, Stanford University July 2006 For at least 35 years, English speakers have been producing sentences with an occurrence of a form of BE that is not licensed in standard English (SE) and is not a disfluency – our Extris (“extra is”). There are many subtypes, but we observe that all are based on SE constructions with a specific discourse function and suggest that any SE construction with this function can have an Extris counterpart. The Isis (“is is”, “double is’, etc.) subtype has gotten much attention – from Bolinger through Brenier et al. – as a variant of SE “thingy”-N-subject or pseudocleft (PC) sentences: (1) N-type Isis: The funny thing is is that Lisa was there too. (2) PC-type Isis: What’s nice is is that it has a sort of other-worldly character. There are also Singlis (single-“is”) examples, where the SE counterparts are not copular. In one set (Jehn, Ross-Hagebaum), the clauses are deictic or existential – our Th: (3) N-type Th: That’s/Here’s our suggestion for it is that... (4) PC-type Th: That’s/This is what we hear all the time is that... (5) There Th: There’s one thing I need to do is leave a check. Then there are McConvell’s (2004) FreeBe’s, in which initial material is either explicitly cataphoric (as above) or implicitly so: (6) Exp FreeBe: We looked at it this way is that... (7) Imp FreeBe: I’d like to say is that... What unites (1)-(7) is that they are all variants of SE constructions that introduce content by announcing, in an explicitly or implicitly cataphoric expression (SU: “set-up”), that it is about to be introduced, and then supplying it in a following expression (PO: “pay-off”, a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics As a Scientific Study of Language
    Linguistics Linguistics is the scientific[1] study of language,[2] and involves an analysis of language form, language meaning, and language in context.[3] The earliest activities in thedocumentation and description of language have been attributed to the 4th century BCEIndian grammarian Pāṇini,[4][5] who wrote a formal description of theSanskrit language in his Aṣṭādhyāyī.[6] Linguists traditionally analyse human language by observing an interplay between sound and meaning.[7] Phonetics is the study of speech and non-speech sounds, and delves into their acoustic and articulatory properties. The study of languagemeaning , on the other hand, deals with how languages encode relations between entities, properties, and other aspects of the world to convey, process, and assign meaning, as well as manage and resolve ambiguity.[8] While the study of semantics typically concerns itself with truth conditions, pragmatics deals with how situational context influences the production of meaning.[9] Grammar is a system of rules which governs the production and use of utterances in a given language. These rules apply to sound[10] as well as meaning, and include componential sub-sets of rules, such as those pertaining to phonology (the organisation of phonetic sound systems), morphology (the formation and composition of words), and syntax (the formation and composition of phrases and sentences).[11] Modern theories that deal with the principles of grammar are largely based within Noam Chomsky's framework of generative linguistics.[12] In the early 20th century, Ferdinand de Saussure distinguished between the notions of langue and parole in his formulation of structural linguistics. According to him, parole is the specific utterance of speech, whereas langue refers to an abstract phenomenon that theoretically defines the principles and system of rules that govern a language.[13] This distinction resembles the one made by Noam Chomsky between competence and performance in his theory of transformative or generative grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistic Variation and Enregisterment in an Online Community of Practice: a Case Study of Metafilter.Com
    Sociolinguistic Variation and Enregisterment in an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study of MetaFilter.com Kimberly Ann Witten PhD University of York Language and Linguistic Science September 2014 I Abstract With the emergence of communities that are primarily based in computer-mediated communication (CMC) environments, we see the prevalence of internet-derived neologisms, i.e., netologisms. Often these netologisms are acronyms (e.g., ‘LOL’), blends (e.g., ‘weblog’), or other forms of abbreviation. These new forms may present challenges for English phonotactics, which must be spontaneously resolved by first-time speakers of the netologisms. If the forms contain orthographic characters or sequences that do not directly or consistently correlate to specific English phonemes or phoneme sequences, it is likely that these new forms display phonetic variation. Netologisms can also be used as linguistic resources in taking stances or asserting aspects of identity, especially where phonetic variation is possible. These stances may represent the identity of the group, or they may become associated with particular identities within the group. The process by which sounds, features and word forms become associated with particular identities is known as enregisterment (Agha, 2003, 2005; Squires, 2010). Enregisterment has traditionally been studied in sociolinguistics as a function of individuals interacting in face-to-face (FtF) environments (Johnstone, Andrus and Danielson, 2006; Beal, 2009). However, as more of our daily interactions are mediated by computers and technology, attention must be paid to how enregisterment may take place in primarily text-based social environments. This research presents the first large-scale mixed-methods study of enregisterment occurring in CMC.
    [Show full text]