Eighteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eighteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill Law Commission Reforming the law Statute Law Repeals: Eighteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill Joint Report Law Com No 308 / Scot Law Com No 210 The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM No 308) (SCOT LAW COM No 210) STATUTE LAW REPEALS: EIGHTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers January 2008 Cm 7303 SG/2008/4 £25.75 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Etherton, Chairman Mr Stuart Bridge Mr David Hertzell Professor Jeremy Horder Mr Kenneth Parker QC The interim Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Mr William Arnold.1 The Law Commission is located at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Drummond Young, Chairman Professor George L Gretton Professor Gerard Maher QC Professor Joseph M Thomson Mr Colin J Tyre QC The Chief Executive of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr Michael Lugton. The Scottish Law Commission is located at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh, EH9 1PR. The terms of this report were agreed on 3 December 2007 The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk 0 Crown Copyright 2008 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] 1 At the date the report was signed, Steve Humphreys was Chief Executive of the Law Commission. William Arnold was appointed interim Chief Executive with effect from 7 January 2008. ii LAW COMMISSION SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REPEALS: EIGHTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL CONTENTS A NOTE ON THE STYLE OF PAGINATION This report is paginated consecutively. However, the Bill section (Appendix 1) is paginated according to the accepted Bill standard, and the number is at the top of the page. For the rest of the report the number is at the bottom of the page. Paragraph Page REPORT 1 APPENDIX 1: DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL 3 APPENDIX 2: EXPLANATORY NOTE ON THE DRAFT BILL 32 CLAUSES 1–3 32 SCHEDULE 1: REPEALS 33 PART 1 ARMED FORCES 33 Group 1 Royal Naval School 1.2 33 Group 2 Greenwich Hospital 1.4 33 Group 3 Military Lands 1.9 34 Group 4 General Repeals 1.12 35 PART 2 COUNTY GAOLS 44 Group 1 Buckinghamshire 2.4 44 Group 2 Cambridgeshire 2.7 44 Group 3 Cheshire 2.12 45 Group 4 Cumbria 2.15 46 Group 5 Devon 2.17 46 Group 6 Essex 2.26 47 Group 7 Gloucestershire 2.29 48 Group 8 Greater London 2.36 49 Group 9 Hampshire 2.52 52 Group 10 Hertfordshire 2.55 52 Group 11 Norfolk 2.58 53 Group 12 Northamptonshire 2.60 53 Group 13 Northumberland 2.62 53 Group 14 Pembrokeshire 2.66 54 Group 15 Somerset 2.68 55 Group 16 Staffordshire 2.70 55 Group 17 Warwickshire 2.72 55 Group 18 West Sussex 2.74 56 Group 19 Wiltshire 2.76 56 iii Paragraph Page PART 3 CRIMINAL LAW 57 PART 4 EAST INDIA COMPANY 66 PART 5 LONDON 70 Group 1 Poor Relief 5.2 70 Group 2 Westminster Court House 5.8 72 Group 3 London Coal Duties 5.14 73 Group 4 Court of Chancery 5.24 76 Group 5 Markets 5.37 78 Group 6 General Repeals 5.46 80 PART 6 POLICE 86 PART 7 RATING 92 PART 8 TAX AND DUTIES 102 PART 9 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING 113 PART 10 TURNPIKES 117 Group 1 Essex 10.9 119 Group 2 Suffolk 10.11 120 Group 3 Norfolk 10.13 122 PART 11 MISCELLANEOUS 124 SCHEDULE 2: CONSEQUENTIAL AND CONNECTED PROVISIONS 127 APPENDIX 3: PERSONS AND ORGANISATIONS CONSULTED ABOUT THE REPEAL PROVISIONS IN THIS REPORT 129 iv THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REPEALS: EIGHTEENTH REPORT1 Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable Jack Straw MP, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, and the Scottish Ministers 1. In pursuance of section 3(1)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it. An explanatory note on the contents of the draft Bill forms Appendix 2. Appendix 3 lists the individuals and organisations we consulted about our proposals. 2. The report recommends the repeal of enactments which have been identified, after detailed research and consultation, as being spent, obsolete, unnecessary or otherwise not now of practical utility.2 The proposals have been widely canvassed with the government departments and other bodies concerned, including the relevant authorities throughout Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.3 Full details of the proposals are set out in the Notes on the Bill which, along with this report, are available on the Law Commissions’ websites (www.lawcom.gov.uk and www.scotlawcom.gov.uk). 3. The report is submitted in pursuance of the Law Commissions’ programme on statute law. The broad objective of this programme is to modernise and simplify the statute book. (Signed) TERENCE ETHERTON JAMES DRUMMOND YOUNG Chairman, Law Commission Chairman, Scottish Law Commission STUART BRIDGE GEORGE GRETTON DAVID HERTZELL GERARD MAHER JEREMY HORDER JOSEPH M THOMSON KENNETH PARKER COLIN TYRE STEVE HUMPHREYS MICHAEL LUGTON Chief Executive Chief Executive 4 December 2007 1 Earlier reports in this series have been called statute law revision reports. Our decision to describe this latest report as a statute law repeals report reflects the reality that our proposals are about repealing obsolete enactments rather than revising them. 2 The enactments proposed for repeal are specified in Schedule 1 to the draft Bill. The Schedule is divided into Parts, some of which are subdivided into Groups. The Parts are, in accordance with the drafting practice adopted in Statute Law (Repeals) Acts since 1975, presented according to their alphabetical order of title with a Part at the end dealing with miscellaneous repeals. 3 Where the proposals extend to Wales, those consulted include the Wales Office and the Counsel General to the Welsh Assembly Government. Where the proposals extend to Scotland, those consulted include the Scottish Executive and the departments responsible for reserved matters in relation to Scotland. Where the proposals extend to Northern Ireland, those consulted include the Northern Ireland Office and the First Legislative Counsel for Northern Ireland. 1 2 (Report, paragraph 1) 3 Appendix 1 - Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill CONTENTS 1 Repeals and associated provisions 2Extent 3 Short Title Schedule 1 — Repeals Part 1 — Armed Forces Part 2 — County Gaols Part 3 — Criminal Law Part 4 — East India Company Part 5 — London Part 6 — Police Part 7 — Rating Part 8 — Tax and Duties Part 9 — Town and Country Planning Part 10 — Turnpikes Part 11 — Miscellaneous Schedule 2 — Consequential and Connected Provisions 4 Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill 5 A BILL TO Promote the reform of the statute law by the repeal, in accordance with recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, of certain enactments which (except in so far as their effect is preserved) are no longer of practical utility, and to make other provision in connection with the repeal of those enactments. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Repeals and associated provisions (1) The enactments referred to in Schedule 1 are repealed to the extent specified in the second column of that Schedule. (2) Schedule 2 (consequential and connected provisions) has effect. 2 Extent 5 (1) This Act extends to the whole of the United Kingdom. (2) This Act also extends to the Isle of Man. (3) Subject to subsection (5), the repeals and amendments in Schedules 1 and 2 have the same extent as the enactments repealed or amended, except as mentioned in the relevant entry. 10 (4) Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide- (a) that the repeal by this Act of any enactment specified in the Order shall on a date so specified extend to any of the Channel Islands or any British overseas territory, and (b) that any provision of Schedule 2 specified in the Order shall on a date 15 so specified extend to any of the Channel Islands or any British overseas territory subject to any modification so specified. 6 Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill (5) Except as provided by an order under subsection (4), this Act does not repeal or amend any enactment so far as the enactment forms part of the law of a country outside the United Kingdom and the Isle of Man. 3 Short Title This Act may be cited as the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2008.
Recommended publications
  • Statute Law Repeals: Consultation Paper Repeal of Turnpike Laws
    Statute Law Repeals: Consultation Paper Repeal of Turnpike Laws SLR 02/10: Closing date for responses – 25 June 2010 BACKGROUND NOTES ON STATUTE LAW REPEALS (SLR) What is it? 1. Our SLR work involves repealing statutes that are no longer of practical utility. The purpose is to modernise and simplify the statute book, thereby reducing its size and thus saving the time of lawyers and others who use it. This in turn helps to avoid unnecessary costs. It also stops people being misled by obsolete laws that masquerade as live law. If an Act features still in the statute book and is referred to in text-books, people reasonably enough assume that it must mean something. Who does it? 2. Our SLR work is carried out by the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission pursuant to section 3(1) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. Section 3(1) imposes a duty on both Commissions to keep the law under review “with a view to its systematic development and reform, including in particular ... the repeal of obsolete and unnecessary enactments, the reduction of the number of separate enactments and generally the simplification and modernisation of the law”. Statute Law (Repeals) Bill 3. Implementation of the Commissions’ SLR proposals is by means of special Statute Law (Repeals) Bills. 18 such Bills have been enacted since 1965 repealing more than 2000 whole Acts and achieving partial repeals in thousands of others. Broadly speaking the remit of a Statute Law (Repeals) Bill extends to any enactment passed at Westminster. Accordingly it is capable of repealing obsolete statutory text throughout the United Kingdom (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision Bill 2007 ————————
    ———————— AN BILLE UM ATHCHO´ IRIU´ AN DLI´ REACHTU´ IL 2007 STATUTE LAW REVISION BILL 2007 ———————— Mar a tionscnaı´odh As initiated ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 [No. 5 of 2007] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, Sess. 2. c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act, 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas., 1. c. 3 General Pier and Harbour Act 1861 Amendment Act 1862 25 & 26 Vict., c.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Contract for Welfare Reform: Antecedent Themes in Welfare to Work Programs
    Behind the contract for welfare reform: antecedent themes in welfare to work programs Article (Published Version) Paz-Fuchs, Amir (2008) Behind the contract for welfare reform: antecedent themes in welfare to work programs. Berkeley Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 29 (2). pp. 101-150. ISSN 1067-7666 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46104/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Behind the Contract for Welfare Reform: Antecedent Themes in Welfare to Work Programs Amir Paz-Fuchs† “What’s past is prologue.” —The Tempest Welfare-to-work programs throughout history and across jurisdictions exhibit similar traits, in form as well as in substance.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna Carta Commemoration Essays [1917]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Henry Elliot Malden, Magna Carta Commemoration Essays [1917] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. SO) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 44) STATUTE LAW REVISION: EIGHTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty January I977 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE E1.75 net Cmnd. 6719 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law eodssioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Cooke, Chairman. Mr. Stephen B. Edell. Mr. Dgrek Hodgson, Q.C. Mr. Norman S. Marsh, C.B.E., Q.C. Dr. Peter M. North. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. J. M. Cartwright Sharp and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Hunter, V.R.D., Chairman. Mr. A. E. Anton, C.B.E. Mr. R. B. Jack. Mr. J. P. H. Mackay. Professor T. B. Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr. J. B. Allan and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. ii THE LAW COMMISSION and THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: EIGHTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill prepared under section 3(l)(d) of theLaw Commissions Act 1965. To the Right Honourable the Lord Elwyn-Jones, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable Ronald King Murray, Q.C., M.P., Her Majesty's Advocate.' We have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 to this Report and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRAN
    Click here for Explanatory Memorandum ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 1 [No. 28.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [2007.] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 [2007.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [No. 28.] Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, sess. 2, c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interdisciplinary Journal
    FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISMFast Capitalism FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM ISSNFAST XXX-XXXX CAPITALISM FAST Volume 1 • Issue 1 • 2005 CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITA LISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM FAST CAPITALISM
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision: Sixteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill
    LAW COMMISSION SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL CONTENTS Paragraph Page REPORT 1 APPENDIX 1: DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL 2 APPENDIX 2: EXPLANATORY NOTE ON THE DRAFT BILL 46 Clauses 1 – 3 46 Schedule 1: Repeals 47 PART I: Administration of Justice 47 Group 1 - Sheriffs 1.1 47 Group 2 - General Repeals 1.4 48 PART II: Ecclesiastical Law 51 Group 1 - Ecclesiastical Leases 2.1 51 Group 2 - Tithe Acts 2.6 53 PART III: Education 57 Group 1 - Public Schools 3.1 57 Group 2 - Universities 3.2 57 PART IV: Finance 60 Group 1 - Colonial Stock 4.1 60 Group 2 - Land Commission 4.4 60 Group 3 - Development of Tourism 4.6 61 Group 4 - Loan Societies 4.7 62 Group 5 - General Repeals 4.9 62 PART V: Hereford and Worcester 65 Statutory Undertaking Provisions 5.8 68 Protective Provisions 5.15 71 Bridges 5.16 72 Miscellaneous Provisions 5.24 75 PART VI: Inclosure Acts 77 iii Paragraph Page PART VII: Scottish Local Acts 83 Group 1 - Aid to the Poor, Charities and Private Pensions 7.7 84 Group 2 - Dog Wardens 7.9 85 Group 3 - Education 7.12 86 Group 4 - Insurance Companies 7.13 86 Group 5 - Local Authority Finance 7.14 87 Group 6 - Order Confirmation Acts 7.19 89 Group 7 - Oyster and Mussel Fisheries 7.22 90 Group 8 - Other Repeals 7.23 90 PART VIII: Slave Trade Acts 92 PART IX: Statutes 102 Group 1 - Statute Law Revision Acts 9.1 102 Group 2 - Statute Law (Repeals) Acts 9.6 103 PART X: Miscellaneous 106 Group 1 - Stannaries 10.1 106 Group 2 - Sea Fish 10.3 106 Group 3 - Sewers Support 10.4 107 Group 4 - Agricultural Research 10.5 108 Group 5 - General Repeals 10.6 108 Schedule 2: Consequential and connected provisions 115 APPENDIX 3: CONSULTEES ON REPEAL OF LEGISLATION 117 PROPOSED IN SCHEDULE 1, PART V iv THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Irvine of Lairg, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Hardie, QC, Her Majesty’s Advocate 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013. (See end of Document for details) Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013 2013 CHAPTER 2 An Act to promote the reform of the statute law by the repeal, in accordance with recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission, of certain enactments which (except in so far as their effect is preserved) are no longer of practical utility. [31st January 2013] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Repeals and revocations The enactments referred to in Schedule 1 are repealed or revoked to the extent shown, subject to the savings contained in Schedule 2. 2 Extent (1) Any repeal or revocation made by this Act (and any saving in Schedule 2 which relates to it) extends to the part or parts of the United Kingdom to which the enactment being repealed or revoked extends. (2) Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide for any repeal or revocation made by this Act to extend, with or without modifications, to any of the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man or any British overseas territory. 3 Short title and commencement (1) This Act may be cited as the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013. (2) This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed. 2 Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • [2006] ANZLH E-Journal
    [2006] ANZLH E-Journal PEMSEL REVISITED THE LEGAL DEFINITIION OF CHARITABLE: A CASE STUDY OF A MOVEABLE FEAST Jean Ely* ‘Well, we might need to revisit that and tell their Lordships they were wrong.’ Justice Michael Kirby1 Overview: According to the Business Review Weekly of March 24-30 2005 2 ‘charities’ constitute a $70 billion third sector of the Australian economy. The use of the common law rather than statutory definition of ‘charitable’ in taxation legislation is considered a problem by various Law Reform Commissions and some members of the judiciary such as Justice Kirby. The ‘legal’ definition of ‘charitable’ is a ‘transplanted category,’ a concept imported into taxation law from trust law. This paper looks backwards into the development of the definition of charitable in trust law and raises the policy question whether the common law ‘legal’ definition of charity has passed its ‘used by’ date in taxation law. INTRODUCTION Taxation exemptions provided through adaptation of Lord Macnaghten’s common law definition of ‘charitable’ in the 1891 House of Lords Pemsel case have highlighted growing strain between the not-for profit and for-profit sector in the economy. In the last two decades official and academic reports have discussed both the definition and regulation of charities,3 and judges and commentators have expressed unease at tensions between legal and eleemosynary meanings of the word. 4 Criticism has surfaced in Australia in the Business Review Weekly and in some newspaper reports.5 Commercial interests complain about the uneven playing field on which they are expected to compete with * Research Fellow in the Taxation Law and Policy Research Institute at Monash; Research Fellow School of History, University of Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Has Poor Relief Declined in Jamaica? a Preliminary Investigation
    HAS POOR RELIEF DECLINED IN JAMAICA? A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION Philip D. Osei Abstract This paper studied the changing fortunes of Poor Relief, a prototype social security benefit that was officially instituted in Jamaica in 1886, and managed by the local authorities. It was discovered that although a number of public inquiries have been conducted into the conditions in which poor people lived, in general, and into the management of poor relief in particular, management of the policy did not keep abreast with developments in modern management. Poor relief has been surpassed by other politically visible modern programmes of poverty reduction. A general deterioration in economic fortunes of the country has also had a negative impact on the supply and real value of public investments in poor relief. Poor relief as a public programme, therefore, requires a serious review. INTRODUCTION Poor relief is a prototype social security benefit that is paid to eligible persons under the law in Jamaica. It was administered as part of the institutions of local government transplanted by the British colonialists from the metropolis to the Caribbean. In spite of its presence in the region for over a century, there is a paucity of academic research on the subject. The most important academic research on poor relief is that done by L P Fletcher (1992) on the system inherited from nineteenth century Barbados, tracing the evolution and administration of the policy from 1900 to 1969. For Jamaica too, poor relief has been an important plank of social and local governance policies for over one and a quarter centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime of Poverty: the Rise and Fall of the Workhouse From
    The Crime of Poverty: The Rise and Fall of the Workhouse From Elizabethan England to Kansas City, Missouri Samantha Carroll Truman State University Faculty Mentor: Dr. Neal McNabb 1 “I believe in work. Criminals do not. I believe the best way to make a man better, of purifying him body and soul, is to keep him at work.” - Police Judge Henry G. Kyle Introduction In today’s politically charged environment, there are many challenges constantly being debated. Controversial opinions concerning taxes, war, and healthcare fly across media screens on a daily basis, with rallies of people arguing competing perspectives. However, there is one issue that has been perhaps overshadowed by the rest: poverty and those affected by it. Poverty has always existed in modern society, and those living in it have often been neglected, and even abused, throughout history. As time has progressed, what used to be a civil distaste for the poor has at times metastasized into outright hatred and structural victimization. In order to grasp the institutionalized neglect of the downtrodden, it is important to rediscover the grim history of those struggling with poverty. One institution that played a crucial role in the systematic abuse of the destitute members of society was the workhouse. This paper will outline the purpose and nature of the institution of the workhouse, while special attention will be given to the Kansas City (Missouri) workhouse, which served as an example of a more progressive vision of the workhouse dedicated more to rehabilitation than punishment. Elizabethan Poor Laws and the Invention of the Workhouse The workhouse has its origins in 17th century England.
    [Show full text]