DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to Hamilton City Council (HCC) Regarding Water Fluoridation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Submission No: 1064 Submission to Hamilton City Council (HCC) regarding Water Fluoridation. Greg Oosterbaan, 6 Howell Avenue, Hamilton. Ph 0273052439 Email [email protected] 31stMarch 2013 1 Submission No: 1064 Contents. 4 – 12 Personal presentation Appendix 13 What are they fluoridating with? From FANNZ website 16 NZ - Fluoridation status by council From FANNZ website 21 HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID AND WATER FLUORIDATION (The Process of Production) http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/production/1C.pdf 24 Material Safety Data Sheet - SODIUM FLUORIDE http://www.fannz.org.nz/pdfs/Sodium%20fluoride%20ORICA.pdf 29 Studies on Tooth Decay Rates After Water Fluoridation Is Stopped Fluoride Action Network | February 2001 31 Supplementary submission to the Inquiry into how to prevent child abuse and improve children's health outcomes Katherine Smith 38 FLUOROSIS 40 Dental Fluorosis Incidence in New Zealand 2 Submission No: 1064 44 Fluoride Is Not an Essential Nutrient Fluoride Action Network | August 2012 | By Michael Connett 46 Tooth Decay Trends in Fluoridated vs. Unfluoridated Countries F.A.N. | July 2012 | By Michael Connett 51 World Health Organisation Figures statistics on dental health of 12 year olds. 53 The Hastings Fluoridation Experiment 55 The Hastings Fluoridation Experiment: Science or Swindle? By John Colquhoun and Robert Mann (http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browse/307/308/5395/3/21) 69 Why I Changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation John Colquhoun 83 Fluoride & Intelligence: The 36 Studies Fluoride Action Network | By Michael Connett& Tara Blank, PhD | UPDATED December 9, 2012 114 (New Zealand) Institute of Directors. (IoD) https://www.iod.org.nz/ 114 http://www.parliament.nz/en- NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/b/c/8/00DBHOH_BILL11034_1-Natural-Health- and-Supplementary-Products-Bill.htm 115 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents Nuclear and radiation accidents From Wikipedia. 3 Submission No: 1064 Water Fluoridation – My Submission Against the Practice. Many of the references against water fluoridation are to be found on FANNZ and FAN websites and are likely to be repeated through these submissions, including this presentation. This does not detract from the importance and authenticity of these references. I have tried to be as accurate and comprehensive as possible but must respect the need to be as concise as possible, in respect of the mammoth amount of study which you must do related to this subject. These first few pages are my discussion around the many references which I have included and are an expression of my own, personal opinion as a concerned parent and resident of Hamilton city. It is recognized that you strive to do your best in your elected role as a Hamilton City Council (HCC) councilor. One of my basic human rights is the right to life. Without water (H2O), “Life” is impossible - water is a vital nutrient. I have a basic human right to water (H2O) and whatever minerals are present at their normal level, for that natural environment. I pay local authority rates and this local authority is charged with providing me, and all other residents of HCC catchment, with water. If there is a substance added, which I wish to avoid, Hamilton City Council (HCC) has a responsibility to provide me with a suitable filtration system, to remove any supplements which I (and my family members) wish to avoid – or to not add the “supplement” in the first place. I have a basic human right to freedom of choice. I choose to not consume fluoridated water (beyond the naturally-occurring levels), whether pharmaceutical or industrial grade. Fluoride is not even a necessary nutrient - water is. So as to not violate my basic human rights, HCC has a legal, moral and ethical duty to provide me (and all other residents who freely choose to not consume added fluoride) with water which does not have supplemented fluoride. Presently, my human rights are being violated – regarding water fluoridation. I ask that this practice is terminated. 4 Submission No: 1064 The New Zealand Institute of Directors (IoD) is a well-respected organisation. The Institute’s 2012 publication, “The Four Pillars of Governance Best Practice for New Zealand Governors”, is a guide for it’s members. In the publication (page 87-) the issue of ethics is discussed. This concerns the different values which people hold and the need to respect other people’s values, wishes, opinions and freedom of choice. It is crucial that the decision regarding water fluoridation is based on ethical values and respect for freedom of choice – an internationally respected basic human right which must be upheld in a democratic society. Waikato region. In our Waikato District, the local authorities of Hauraki, Matamata-Piako, Otorohanga, Waitomo and Waipa do not fluoridate their public water supply. I am not aware of any sound scientific evidence showing significantly higher levels of dental caries in these un-fluoridated localities, relative to Hamilton which has been fluoridated. There are a number of data comparisons but these, I believe, are not standardized and are very subjective and would therefore be scientifically invalid. Any research data or data analysis must be validated to a standard where any report is acceptable for publication in an appropriate international scientific journal. There are no bus-loads of dentists commuting to these outlying towns from Hamilton. There are no unemployed dentists in Hamilton. There are dental caries amongst the young residents of Hamilton. Honest consideration of the above will result in the conclusion that adding fluoride to Hamilton’s water supply does not endow magical powers of dental health on the consumers. Indeed there is ample, valid scientific evidence of the opposite. A growing list of Local Authorities worldwide (including New Zealand) are reversing the practice based on similar information as you receive – from health “authorities” and also those who present a sound, scientifically-supported argument in opposition. Also, please note that “authority” is in the legislative sense and does not necessarily guarantee “authenticity”. 5 Submission No: 1064 Privy Council (1963) “the addition of fluoride adds no impurity and the water remains not only water but pure water and becomes greatly improved and still natural water containing no foreign elements” This decision is fifty years old and obviously must be revisited, based on comprehensive research in the interim. Hydrofluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6) is the form of fluoride delivered in the Hamilton water supply. This is an inorganic compound and a bi-product of the fertiliser industry and is, I believe, a “foreign element”. 6 Submission No: 1064 From Waikato DHB website – public access. Who has water fluoridation currently? “Over 300 million people in 39 countries have access to fluoridated drinking water. These include Australia, Canada, Ireland, Israel, Singapore, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States”. In contrast with the above quote from the DHB website, the vast majority of the world does not have added fluoride to the water supply. In Europe, approximately 97% is not fluoridated. I am not aware of any country where there is public protest to have fluoride added to the public water supply. The only public protest which I am aware of is people resisting enforced fluoridation. For more robust data of the global situation, see the WHO research results in the appendix. Statement of Waikato DHB position (WDHB) “Support further research into the benefits and potential risks of water fluoridation, and into appropriate alternatives to water fluoridation in communities where fluoridation is not feasible”. What internationally referenced, scientifically valid (and externally validated) research has Waikato DHB (WDHB) engaged in to study the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation? For example, a very valid project would be a meta-analysis to scientifically challenge and disprove the research presented on FANNZ website and Dr. Paul Connett’s publications. Has such a project been conducted and what are the results? Has WDHB supported the case for water fluoridation with evidence which refutes the case presented against water fluoridation? Have the presenters of the case against water fluoridation supported their case with evidence which refutes the case for water fluoridation? Provision of objective support (not simplistic, un-supported comment) against opposition presentation is a valid approach. 7 Submission No: 1064 I contend that Fluoride, in the form of Hydrofluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6), is being delivered to the whole population, as a supplement (“natural levels are being topped up” [i.e. supplemented] – WDHB web site), without individual medical prescription but on the authority of and promotion by medical staff on MoH and DHB payroll. See the NZ Government Natural-Health-and-Supplementary-Products-Bill. Is the practice of water fluoridation as a supplement, as is my contention, addressed in this bill – either directly or by implication? The diversity of our population in age, size, weight, metabolic rate, physiological capacity, health status, daily work and recreation tasks, etc dictates that there is a vast spread of water consumption between people and individual dose of added fluoride is also broad and not controllable. There is individualised dose of prescription medicines / supplements to multitudes of people - the individuality is respected and negative consequences are monitored for. This is not so for the health supplement Fluoride. Hydrofluorosilicic
Recommended publications
  • Kapiti Coast District / E.Info@Interest.Co.Nz / P

    Kapiti Coast District / [email protected] / P

    APRIL 2019 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT WWW.INTEREST.CO.NZ / [email protected] / P. 09 3609670 KAPITI COAST DISTRICT HOME LOAN AFFORDABILITY REPORT April 2019 Home loan affordability is a measure of the proportion of take-home pay that is needed to make the mortgage payment for a typical household. If that is less than 40%, then a mortgage is considered ‘affordable’. The following are typical assessments for households at three stages of home ownership. FIRST HOME BUYERS 25-29 YOUNG FAMILY 30-34 OLDER FAMILY 35-39 First home buyers earn a medi- Young family buyers earn medi- Older family buyers earn medi- an income for their age group, an incomes in their age bracket, an incomes in their age brack- and buy a first quartile house and buy a median house in et, and buy a median house in in their area. Both parties work their area. One partner works their area. Both partners work full-time. half-time. full-time. Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a Mortgage payment as a percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay percentage of the take home pay Take Home April 19 29.7% Take Home April 19 29.2% Take Home Pay Pay Pay April 19 17.6% April 18 30.3% April 18 26.8% $1,517.11 $1,334.99 $1,856.59 April 18 17.1% per Week April 17 26.9% per Week April 17 29.2% per Week April 17 19.4% April 14 - April 14 26.0% April 14 33.3% This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple This report estimates how affordable it would be for a couple where both are aged 25–29 and are working full time, to buy a with a young family to move up the property ladder and buy their who are both aged 35-39 and working full time, to move up the home at the lower quartile price in Kapiti Coast District.
  • Classifications

    Classifications

    Classifications rt.code.desc Classifications Code Classifications rt.code.base Akitio River Scheme - River Maintenance RC Direct Benefit AREA Akitio River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection AC Flooding Urban CAPITAL Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection SUIP AN Annual Charge TARGET Ashhurst Scheme - Lower Stream Maintenance AL Channel Maintenance High AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Upper Stream Maintenance AU Channel Maintenance Low AREA Eastern Manawatu - Lower River Maintenance EL Channell Maintenane High AREA Eastern Manawatu - Upper River Maintenance EU Channell Maintenance low AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Indirect IN Indirect Benefit TARGET Forest Road Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme C Moderate Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme D Low Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme E Minor Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme F Indirect Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D1 High Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D2 Medium Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D3 Moderate Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D4 Minor Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D5 Low Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme SUIP AC Annual Charge TARGET Foxton East Drainage Scheme Urban U1 Urban CAPITAL Haunui Drainage Scheme A Direct Benefit CAPITAL Himatangi Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Himatangi Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Himatangi
  • Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington

    Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington September 2017 ISBN 978-0-9941409-4-4 (PDF) Making a Community: Filipinos in Wellington About the Author As an American living in New Zealand, I’ve been observing the debate here on immigration and multiculturalism. I arrived in Wellington last year with my Kiwi husband and three-year old son – and while settling in we’ve spent a lot of time discovering the delights of the city and its people. The experience also gave me some perspective on being a migrant far from home. I have a professional interest in South East Asian history, languages and culture - I just completed a PhD on the subject. I speak some Filipino, and am fascinated by the Philippines’ complex history. One of the major phenomena in the Philippines since the 1970s has been the growth of the global Filipino diaspora. That story has often been full of sadness. So I was intrigued by anecdotes of positivity and success from Wellington. Writing about how the migrant Filipino community has settled in New Zealand has been more than just a research project. It has highlighted how migration plays a role in community building. It also has meaning for me and my family’s future here. I really wanted to share some of the stories that I think reflect successful outcomes from immigration over the past thirty years. By Dr Rebecca Townsend 1 Key Points 1. 2. 3. Filipinos comprise 1 percent of Filipinos are a vital part of Most Filipinos in New Zealand are New Zealand’s population – the New Zealand’s dairy, healthcare, not Overseas Filipino Workers third largest Asian ethnic group construction, nursing, aged care, (OFW).
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration

    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
  • Memorandum of Understanding Between

    Memorandum of Understanding Between

    Attachment 1 to Report 06.583 Page 1 of 5 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AND KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL, PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL, WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL, AND WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL PURPOSE The parties to this Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) share a common obligation to enhance the well being and health of people in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington, and to work with them in building strong, vibrant and healthy communities. This MoU will assist in achieving the Regional Community Outcome: "Healthy Community" as outlined in the Wellington Regional Strategy. This MoU sets out a process to assist co-operation between the above organisations. It is intended that this MoU will: • ensure that resources (people, funding and materials) are used to improve the well being of the communities in Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington • ensure communication between the organisations is open and timely. PROTOCOLS AND PRINCIPLES • the parties will work together on issues where it is agreed that the population of Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington will benefit from a collaborative approach • the MoU acknowledges each organisation's unique accountability and contribution to shared processes • the parties agree to act in good faith on issues of information and disclosure • the parties agree to work collaboratively in an open and transparent manner • the parties agree to build on work currently undertaken within Kapiti, Porirua and Wellington. • the parties acknowledge the role of Regional Public Health (RPH) in delivering regional public health services, and that this MoU will not preclude the development of such relationships by each party with RPH As signatories of this MoU each party will ensure: • early notification to affected parties through the distribution of draft documentation, of major policy discussions, which may have implications beyond the boundaries of the decision-making party.
  • THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 51

    THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 51

    1334 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 51 Declaring Land in Roadways Laid Out in Block IX, Kerikeri hereto is hereby taken for a rubbish tip and shall vest in Survey District, Bay of Islands County, to be Road the Chairman, Councillors, and Inhabitants of the County of Taumarunui as from the date hereinafter mentioned; and I also declare that this Proclamation shall take effect 0]1 DENIS BLUNDELL, Governor-General and after the 19th day of June 1975. A PROCLAMATION PURSUANT to section 421 of the Maori Affairs Act 1953, SCHEDULE I, Sir Edward Denis Blundell, the Governor-General of New WELLINGTON LAND DISTRICT Zealand, hereby declare the land described in the Schedule ALL that piece of land containing 1.2410 hectares situated hereto, and comprised in roadways laid out by the Maori in Block II, Puketi Survey District, being part Pukawa 4Bl; Land Court by an order dated the 24th day of August as shown marked A on plan S.O. 30343 lodged in the office 1970 to be road, and to be vested in the Chairman, Council­ of the Chief Surveyor at Wellington. lors, and Inhabitants of the County of Bay of Islands. Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor­ General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, SCHEDULE this 28th day of May '1975. NORTII AUCKLAND LAND DISTRICT [L.s.] M. A. CONNELLY, Minister of Works and Development. ALL those pieces of land situated in Block IX, Kerikeri Survey District, described as follows: Goo SAVE TIIB QUEEN! A. R. P. Being (P.W. 53/323/1; Wg.
  • Kapiti Coast District Council and Other Councils, Including Population Forecasts

    Kapiti Coast District Council and Other Councils, Including Population Forecasts

    Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment Kāpiti Coast District Council November 2019 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 229 230 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment Contents Executive Summary 232 5.0 Infrastructure 270 Background 233 5.1 Three Waters 270 Residential demand 233 5.2 Local Road Network 271 Residential capacity 233 5.3 State Highway Network 272 Business demand 234 5.4 Public Transport 272 Business capacity 234 5.5 Open Space 273 Infrastructure capacity 234 5.6 Education 273 1.0 Introduction 237 6.0 Relationship between Housing and Business Land 274 2.0 Existing Policy Context 238 7.0 Monitoring 275 2.1 Kāpiti Coast District Plan 238 7.1 Historic Development Activity 275 2.2 Development Management Strategy 2007 238 7.2 Market Indicators 278 2.3 Infrastructure Strategy 2018-2048 238 7.3 Price Efficiency Indicators 285 2.4 Roads of National Significance and Town Centres Transformation 239 8.0 Conclusion 293 3.0 Residential Demand and Capacity 240 9.0 Next Actions 294 3.1 Historic urban growth and settlement 240 3.2 Current growth and settlement trends 240 3.3 Future Housing Demand 241 3.4 Housing Development Capacity 248 3.5 Housing Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 251 4.0 Business Demand and Capacity 258 4.1 Business Development Context 258 4.2 Current Economic and Business Drivers 259 4.3 Future Business Demand 260 4.4 Business Development Capacity 264 4.5 Business Feasibility, Realisation and Sufficiency 266 Housing and Business Land Capacity Assessment 231 Executive Summary This report presents the results from the Wellington Region Housing and Business Development Capacity Assessment (HBA) for the Kāpiti Coast District Council.
  • The Case of Kapiti Coast District Council

    The Case of Kapiti Coast District Council

    THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association Getting an outdoor smokefree policy: the case of Kapiti Coast District Council Leigh Halkett, George Thomson Abstract Aim To explore how a smokefree parks policy was conceived, accepted and developed by and for Kapiti Coast District Council (KCDC). Method Thirteen people involved in the smokefree parks policy process for KCDC were interviewed in person during November–December 2008. Supporting documentation and websites were accessed and reviewed. Results In September 2008 the KCDC agreed to adopt a smokefree parks and playground policy, following an initiative from a smokefree coalition of several public health organisations. The policy was developed collaboratively by this coalition with input from the council, and was supported by key local organisations. The KCDC appears to have adopted a smokefree outdoor areas (SFOA) policy because of demonstrated public support, the relative simplicity and low cost of the policy, the success of similar policies elsewhere, and because of the alignment with desired community outcomes. The challenges included finding funding and allocating staff time for this project. There were also concerns with how the policy would be enforced. Conclusions A collaborative approach amongst health and community groups for achieving SFOA policies works well. The experience with council SFOA policies has considerable impact on the adoption of similar policies by other councils. To maximise this influence, information about the policies needs to be spread nationally by the health and local government sectors. Legislative efforts to reduce smoking and the exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in New Zealand have included the Smoke-free Environments Act 1990 (SEA) and the Smoke-free Environments Amendment Act 2003 (SEAA).
  • Council Agenda Extraordinary Meeting

    Council Agenda Extraordinary Meeting

    MASTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA EXTRAORDINARY MEETING MONDAY 30 AUGUST 2021 4.30PM MEMBERSHIP Her Worship (Chairperson) Cr G Caffell Cr B Gare Cr D Holmes Cr B Johnson Cr G McClymont Cr F Mailman Cr T Nelson Cr T Nixon Cr C Peterson Cr S Ryan Noce is given that an extraordinary meeng of the Masterton District Council will be held at 4.30pm on Monday 30 August 2021 . RECOMMENDATIONS IN REPORTS ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS COUNCIL POLICY UNTIL ADOPTED 26 August 2021 Values 1. Public interest: members will serve the best interests of the people within the Masterton district and discharge their duties conscientiously, to the best of their ability. 2. Public trust: members, in order to foster community confidence and trust in their Council, will work together constructively and uphold the values of honesty, integrity, accountability and transparency. 3. Ethical behaviour: members will not place themselves in situations where their honesty and integrity may be questioned, will not behave improperly and will avoid the appearance of any such behaviour. 4. Objectivity: members will make decisions on merit; including appointments, awarding contracts, and recommending individuals for rewards or benefits. 5. Respect for others: will treat people, including other members, with respect and courtesy, regardless of their ethnicity, age, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Members will respect the impartiality and integrity of Council staff. 6. Duty to uphold the law: members will comply with all legislative requirements applying to their role, abide by this Code, and act in accordance with the trust placed in them by the public.
  • Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)

    Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)

    APPENDIX 3 Operative Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies Proposed Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies S149(G)3 Key Issues Report – Kāpiti Coast District Council C.1: RESIDENTIAL ZONE C.1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE Over 90% of the district's population live on less than 4% of the land. This land comprises the residential environment. To accommodate this population there has been considerable investment made in buildings, services (water, gas, wastewater disposal) roading and amenity facilities (shops and schools). This represents a significant physical resource which needs to be managed to enable people and communities to meet their needs and to minimise any adverse effects of activities on both the natural and physical environment. The management of this resource can be achieved within the District Plan through controls in the design of subdivision, use and development. The objectives and policies set out below in C.1.1 are intended to address the significant resource management issues identified in B.2. The related subdivision and development issues in B.8 are addressed in C.7. C.1.1 Objectives & Policies OBJECTIVE 1.0 - GENERAL ENSURE THAT THE LOW DENSITY, QUIET CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT’S RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS IS MAINTAINED AND THAT ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE AMENITY VALUES THAT CONSTITUTE THIS CHARACTER AND MAKE THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS SAFE, PLEASANT AND HEALTHY PLACES FOR RESIDENTS ARE AVOIDED, REMEDIED OR MITIGATED. The residential environments within the Kapiti Coast District generally have a low density character, typified by low building heights and density and a high proportion of public and private open space.
  • EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment

    EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment

    EPA Board of Enquiry Hon Sir John Hanley David Bunting, Environment Commissioner Glenice Paine Mark Appledoorn Intro My name is Ruben Blok and I live at 79 Belvedere Ave, Waikanae. I am a Business Intelligence consultant with a private local firm and I create analytic reporting solutions for major private and public sector organisations throughout the Australasia. I am usually not too worried about government decisions but given my field of expertise and what I have witnessed with this project something very wrong is happening here and the information does simply not add up. I oppose the NZTA Makays to Peka Peka proposal and would like to tell you my experience and explain my findings. Lead Up We moved from Auckland to Kapiti (originally to Raumati South) in 2007 to start a family and fell in love with the community and surroundings. The combination of bush, beach, and lifestyle was an easy decision. We heard about KCDCs initial proposal to create a new alternate road and bridge to Waikanae I quite liked the idea. It seems a little crazy that you can almost walk to Waikanae from Paraparaumu Beach faster than you can drive (we tested it the other day). A year or two later we received the notification from NZTA that as part of the Roads of National Significance project they were planning to upgrade the existing SH1 to future proof the national grid. We again quite optimistic when we saw the proposals (WO and EO only) and chose option EO, upgrade the existing SH1, as it had minimal impact on the existing community leaving SH1 as close to its original location as possible.
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)

    Notes Subscription Agreement)

    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.