DOCSLIB.ORG

Daugavpils Jēkabpils Jelgava Jūrmala 361.92 108.57 14,94; 79,57; 1662,39 Rēzekne Valmiera 277.4 Ādažu Novads Aizkraukles No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Daugavpils Jēkabpils Jelgava Jūrmala 361.92 108.57 14,94; 79,57; 1662,39 Rēzekne Valmiera 277.4 Ādažu Novads Aizkraukles No Informācija par iesniegtajiem pārskatiem un ieskaitītajiem līdzekļiem, kas iegūti par rūpnieciskās zvejas tiesību nomu un privāto zvejas (tai skaitā nēģu zvejas) tiesību izmantošanu ezeros, ūdenskrātuvēs, upēs un to posmos Zivju fonda dotāciju veidošanai 2015.gada 2.pusgadā.* Kopējā summa par Valsts pamatbudžetā Pārskata nomas līgumā noteiktām pārskaitāmā summa Pārskaitīts Valsts pamatbudžetā Pārskaitījuma Valsts Pilsēta vai novads Piezīmes saņemšanas datums vai privātām zvejas Zivju fonda ieņēmumu Zivju fonda veidošanai, EUR** pamatbudžetā datums tiesībām, EUR veidošanai, EUR informācija nav Daugavpils saņemta informācija nav Jēkabpils saņemta informācija nav Jelgava saņemta 13.08.; 15.10.2015. Jūrmala 04.01.2016. 361.92 108.57 14,94; 79,57; 1662,39 19.01.2016. zvejas tiesības nav 04.08.2015. Liepāja 14.01.2016. iznomātas 1115.89 Par 2015.gada 1.pusgadu informācija nav Rēzekne saņemta Rīga 20.01.2016. 142.26 42.68 42.68 28.08.2015. informācija nav Valmiera saņemta Ventspils 15.01.2016. 924.68 277.4 zvejas tiesības nav Ādažu novads 14.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Aglonas novads saņemta zvejas tiesības nav Aizkraukles novads 26.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Aizputes novads 26.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Aknīstes novads 28.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Alojas novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Alsungas novads saņemta 19.95 26.01.2016. Alūksnes novads: 05.01.2016. 672.60 201.78 201.78 06.01.2016. Mārkalnes pag. 29.01.2016. 605.60 181.68 informācija nav Amatas novads saņemta zvejas tiesības nav Apes novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Auces novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Babītes novads saņemta informācija nav Baldones novads saņemta zvejas tiesības nav Baltinavas novads 26.01.2016. iznomātas Balvu novads 13.08.2015. 134.64 40.41 Par 2015.gada 1.pusgadu informācija nav Bauskas novads saņemta zvejas tiesības nav Beverīnas novads 27.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Brocēnu novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas 2508,00 752,40 684.00 12.01.2016. Burtnieku novads 20.01.2016. 1044,00 391,50 391,50*** 12.01.2016. zvejas tiesības nav Carnikavas novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas zvejas tiesības nav Cēsu novads 13.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav 22.12.2015. Cesvaines novads saņemta 12.83 zvejas tiesības nav Ciblas novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas 355,26; 512,21 03.11.; 29.12.2015. informācija nav Dagdas novads saņemta 7.69 15.01.2016. KalupesDaugavpils pag. novads: NaujenesLīksnas pag. pag. 14.01.2016. 14.23 4.27 4.27 12.01.2016. 64,03 08.12.2015. Skrudalienas pag. 07.01.2016. 213.42 64.03 30,78 19.01.2016. zvejas tiesības nav Dobeles novads 18.01.2016. iznomātas Dundagas novads 15.01.2016. 9691.97 2907.59 2907.59 12.08.2015. Par 2015.gada 1.pusgadu zvejas tiesības nav Durbes novads 29.01.2016. iznomātas Engures novads: Engures pag. 15.01.2016. 28.34 8.54 112.85 04.01.2016. Rīgas jūras līča piekraste Lapmežciema pag. 11.01.2016. 71.13 21.34 21.34 08.01.2016. zvejas tiesības Ērgļu novads 20.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Garkalnes novads saņemta informācija nav Grobiņas novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Gulbenes novads 15.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Iecavas novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Ikšķiles novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Ilūkstes novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Inčukalna novads 28.01.2016. nav iznomātas Jaunjelgavas novads 25.01.2016. 28.46 8.54 8.54 22.01.2016. zvejas tiesības Jaunpiebalgas novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Jaunpils novads 25.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Jēkabpils novads 15.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Jelgavas novads 25.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Kandavas novads saņemta informācija nav Kārsavas novads saņemta informācija nav Kocēnu novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Kokneses novads 28.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Krāslavas novads 11.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Krimuldas novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas Krustpils novads 18.01.2016. 14.23 4.27 4.27 18.01.2016. zvejas tiesības Ķeguma novads 15.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Ķekavas novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Kuldīgas novads 15.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Lielvārdes novads 05.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Līgatnes novads saņemta Limbažu novads: Limbažu pag. 14.01.2016. 34.20 10.26 zvejas tiesības 14.01.2016. Skultes pag. 14.01.2016. nav iznomātas 10.26 zvejas tiesības Līvānu novads 25.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Lubānas novads saņemta 04.08.; 06.10.; 04.11.; Ludzas novads 08.01.2016. 837.57 251.27 2,99; 63,25; 73,03; 71,82 08.12.2015. Madonas novads: Lazdonas pag. 4.57 02.10.2015. Ļaudonas pag. 14.01.2016. 8.55 2.57 99,60 29,80 Par 2015.gada 1.pusgadu 11.01.2016. 1566.75 29.12.2015. VestienasOšupes pag. pag. 5022,90 1506,75 Par 2015.gada 2.pusgadu zvejas tiesības nav Mālpils novads 21.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Mārupes novads saņemta informācija nav Mazsalacas novads saņemta 994,44 301,32 Engures ezers 184,94 55,48 Rīgas jūras līcis Mērsraga novads 08.01.2016. 106,72 32,02 Grīvas upe zvejas tiesības nav Naukšēnu novads 15.01.2016. iznomātas infomācija nav Neretas novads saņemta infomācija nav Nīcas novads saņemta 1328.53 28.12.2015. zvejas tiesības nav Ogres novads 30.12.2015. iznomātas infomācija nav Olaines novads saņemta infomācija nav Ozolnieku novads saņemta zvejas tiesības nav Pārgaujas novads 27.01.2016. iznomātas 369.36 27.08.2015. infomācija nav 24.11.2015. Pāvilostas novads saņemta 2280.23 Par 2015.gadu informācija nav Pļaviņu novads saņemta 105.08 16.12.2015. Preiļu novads 21.01.2016. 136.80 41.04 41.04 21.01.2016. zvejas tiesības nav Priekules novads 22.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Priekuļu novads saņemta Raunas novads: zvejas tiesības nav Drustu pag. 21.01.2016. iznomātas Riebiņu novads 28.01.2016. 89.64 26.89 26.89 26.01.2016. 05.08.; 02.10.; 62,50; 77,47; 290,80; 223,70; 03.11.;14.12.2015. Rēzeknes novads 15.01.2016. 2719.97 816.05 430,39 07.01.2016. Rucavas novads 19.01.2016. 2081.64 622.39 709.35 28.01.2016. zvejas tiesības 12.01.2016. Rojas novads nav iznomātas Rugāju novads 26.01.2016. 96.90 29.07 29.07 26.01.2016. informācija nav Rūjienas novads saņemta informācija nav Rundāles novads saņemta informācija nav Salacgrīvas novads saņemta 56,71; 1948,89 04.11.2015.; 07.01.2016. Salas novads 21.01.2016. 14.23 9.96 22.01.2016. Salaspils novads 04.01.2016. 7740.00 941.87 941.87 29.12.2015. informācija nav Saldus novads saņemta informācija nav Saulkrastu novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Sējas novads 25.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Siguldas novads 05.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Skrīveru novads 13.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Skrundas novads 05.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Smiltenes novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Stopiņu novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Strenču novads 26.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Talsu novads 22.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Tērvetes novads saņemta informācija nav Tukuma novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Vaiņodes novads 21.01.2016. nav iznomātas zvejas tiesības Valkas novads 11.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Varakļānu novads saņemta zvejas tiesības Vārkavas novads 14.01.2016. nav iznomātas informācija nav Vecpiebalgas novads saņemta informācija nav Vecumnieku novads saņemta Ventspils novads 11.01.2016. 98.16 29.45 zvejas tiesības nav 15.01.2016. Viesītes novads 22.01.2016. iznomātas 82.27 zvejas tiesības nav Viļakas novads 08.01.2016. iznomātas informācija nav Viļānu novads saņemta informācija nav Zilupes novads saņemta SIA "EKO PUNKTS" 487.19 11.01.2016. Rāznas ezera nomas maksa KOPĀ novadi: 18 669.64 KOPĀ: 19 548.33 * Saskaņā ar MK 2009.gada 11.augusta noteikumiem Nr.918 ** Ieskaitīts Valsts budžetā līdz 2016.gada 31.janvārim ***Saskaņā ar MK 2001.gada 7.augusta noteikumiem Nr.359 "Licencētās rūpnieciskās zvejas kārtība" .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Tourism D
    5 POTTERY WORKSHOP OF VALDIS PAULINS CATERING SERVICES Hello, traveller! Address: Dumu Street 8, Kraslava, Kraslava municipality, Latvia 13 JAUNDOME ENVORONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTRE AND EXHIBITION HALL 21 MUSIC WORKSHOP “BALTHARMONIA” Mob.: +371 29128695 DINING HALL „ DAUGAVA” Address: Novomisli, Ezernieki rural territory, Dagda municipality, Latvia Address: "Bikava 2a", Gaigalava, Gaigalava rural territory, Rezekne municipality, Latvia CAFE “PIE ČERVONKAS PILS” This is a guide-book that will help you to experience an exciting trip along The Green Routes E-mail: [email protected] Address: Rigas Street 28, Kraslava, Mob.: +371 25960309 Phone: +371 28728790, + 371 26593441 Address: Cervonka-1, Vecsaliena rural territory, of the border areas of Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus. Routes leading to specially protected nature Website: http://www.visitkraslava.com/ Kraslavas municipality, Latvia E - mail: [email protected] E - mail: [email protected] Daugavpils municipality, Latvia areas under the state care are called “green” ones. These routes are “green” because providers of GPS: X:697648, Y:199786 / 55° 54' 10.30", 27° 9'42.27" Phone: +371 65622634, Mob.: +371 29112899 Website: www.visitdagda.com Website: http://www.baltharmonia.lv Mob.: +371 29726105 tourism service take care of accessibility of environment for people with disabilities. The workshop is around on the territory of the protected landscape Fax: +371 65622266 GPS: X:723253, Y:227872 / 56° 8' 36.72", 27° 35'88" GPS: X:687623, Y:291964 / 56° 44' 1.98", 27° 4'2.23" GPS: X: 673571, Y: 189832 / 55° 49’ 22.13’’, 26° 46’ 14.74’’ You are welcome at the places, where you will get acquainted with the values of the nature area „Augšdaugava”.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Schedule
    GAME Schedule saturday 3 to sunday 11 july 2021 RIGA & DAUGAVPILS Group A Group B Group C Group D SENEGAL (SEN) PUERTO RICO (PUR) ARGENTINA (ARG) TURKEY (TUR) CANADA (CAN) IRAN (IRI) FRANCE (FRA) MALI (MLI) LITHUANIA (LTU) SERBIA (SRB) KOREA (KOR) AUSTRALIA (AUS) JAPAN (JPN) LATVIA (LAT) SPAIN (ESP) USA (USA) Group Phase SEN - JPN CAN - LTU PUR - LAT IRI - SRB FRA - KOR ARG - ESP TUR - USA MLI - AUS sat (Group A) (Group A) (Group B) (Group B) (Group C) (Group C) (Group D) (Group D) Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre 03 Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre 76 - 71 80 - 71 79 - 75 67 - 88 117 - 48 69 - 68 54 - 83 67 - 97 JPN - CAN LTU - SEN LAT - IRI SRB - PUR KOR - ARG ESP - FRA AUS - TUR USA - MLI (Group A) (Group A) (Group B) (Group B) sun (Group C) (Group C) (Group D) (Group D) Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre 04 Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre 75 - 100 78 - 73 58 - 48 84 - 64 74 - 112 60 - 59 62 - 64 100 - 52 Monday 5 July - Rest day SEN - CAN LTU - JPN SRB - LAT PUR - IRI KOR - ESP ARG - FRA TUR - MLI AUS - USA (Group A) (Group A) (Group B) (Group B) tue (Group C) (Group C) (Group D) (Group D) Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre Daugavpils Oly.Centre 06 Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre Riga Olympic Centre 56 - 85 95 - 63 71 - 70 68 - 81 48 - 99 52 - 89 58 - 54 66 - 87 FINAL PHASE
    [Show full text]
  • The Saeima (Parliament) Election
    /pub/public/30067.html Legislation / The Saeima Election Law Unofficial translation Modified by amendments adopted till 14 July 2014 As in force on 19 July 2014 The Saeima has adopted and the President of State has proclaimed the following law: The Saeima Election Law Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Citizens of Latvia who have reached the age of 18 by election day have the right to vote. (As amended by the 6 February 2014 Law) 2.(Deleted by the 6 February 2014 Law). 3. A person has the right to vote in any constituency. 4. Any citizen of Latvia who has reached the age of 21 before election day may be elected to the Saeima unless one or more of the restrictions specified in Article 5 of this Law apply. 5. Persons are not to be included in the lists of candidates and are not eligible to be elected to the Saeima if they: 1) have been placed under statutory trusteeship by the court; 2) are serving a court sentence in a penitentiary; 3) have been convicted of an intentionally committed criminal offence except in cases when persons have been rehabilitated or their conviction has been expunged or vacated; 4) have committed a criminal offence set forth in the Criminal Law in a state of mental incapacity or a state of diminished mental capacity or who, after committing a criminal offence, have developed a mental disorder and thus are incapable of taking or controlling a conscious action and as a result have been subjected to compulsory medical measures, or whose cases have been dismissed without applying such compulsory medical measures; 5) belong
    [Show full text]
  • Jelgava Atrodas Zemgales Līdzenuma Dienvidu Daļā
    Jelgava skaitļos 2009 Cienījamie jelgavnieki un pilsētas viesi! Ikviens patiesi mīl tikai vienu pilsētu – pilsētu, kuras elpu un garu izprot līdz pašai tās dziļākajai būtībai. Tā ikviens īsts jelgavnieks mīl un lepojas ar savu pilsētu. Mēs lepojamies ar savu vēsturi, tradīcijām un veidojam jaunas. Tomēr visvairāk lepojamies ar saviem cilvēkiem-gudriem, talantīgiem un strā- dīgiem, kuri vienmēr ir gatavi ieguldīt prātu un sirdi pilsētas un valsts uzplaukumā. Jelgavas vēsture ir bagāta, bet šodienu veidojam mēs. Protams, vienmēr gribas vairāk, labāk, ātrāk.Tomēr svarīgāk ir stabili, droši un plānveidīgi.Un Jelgavas attīstība šajos gados ir viennozīmīgi ir gājusi uz augšup. Andris Rāviņš, Jelgavas domes priekšsēdētājs Īsi par Jelgavu Jelgava atrodas Zemgales līdzenuma dienvidu daļā. Tā ir ceturtā lielākā pilsēta Latvijā. Jelgavas kopplatība ir 60,3 km2, no kuriem: - ūdens platības ir 2,72 km2 - parki aizņem 1,62 km2 - meži aizņem 12,64 km2 Jelgava ir vienīgā pilsēta Latvijā, kuras ģerbonī ir attēlots valsts mazais ģerbonis. Ģerboni pilsēta ieguva reizē ar pilsētas tiesībām 1573. gadā. Pirmajā ģerbonī bija atainota kronēta brieža galva aveņsarkanā laukā, tagad pilsētas ģerbonis ir alņa galva purpura laukā. 1938. gada 28. oktobrī tika apstiprināts pilsētas karogs. Tas dalīts divās vienāda platuma daļās: augšā tumši zils, bet apakšā - sarkans; karoga centrā ir Jelgavas pilsētas ģerbonis. Attālumi: Jelgava - Rīga 42 km Jelgava- Viļņa 295 km Jelgava- Tallina 350 km Jelgava - Maskava 1053 km Jelgava - Stokholma 482 km Jelgava - Berlīne 1221 km
    [Show full text]
  • A Social Assessment of Poverty in Latvia
    LISTENING TO THE POOR: A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA Report on research findings (March – June 1998) Institute of Philosophy and Sociology Riga, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS TALKING TO THE POOR:............................................................................................................ I A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA .............................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... VII OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................ VII METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. VII FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER 1: OBJECTIVES AND METHODS............................................................................1 AN ECONOMY IN TRANSITION................................................................................................1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................2 METHODOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • CONTINUITY in CHANGE? Latvia’S Local Governments After Regional Reform and Local Government Elections a REFORM to TACKLE REGIONAL DISPARITIES
    PERSPECTIVE DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS Despite a substantial recent re- gional reform which was vigor- ously opposed by local leaders, the local government elections held in June 2021 did not alter CONTINUITY the balance of power in Latvia. As a political project, the re- form may have achieved its IN CHANGE? goal to implement effi ciency gains, yet the phenomenon of “strongmen” mayors continues Latvia’s Local Governments after Regional Reform to persist. and Local Government Elections A record-low voter turnout Daunis Auers and a general discontent with Riga, June 2021 parties and government per- formance may be an indication that a chance to fi nd a widely accepted and long-term re- gional reform solution was missed. DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS CONTINUITY IN CHANGE? Latvia’s Local Governments after Regional Reform and Local Government Elections A REFORM TO TACKLE REGIONAL DISPARITIES Latvia’s eighth regular local government elections since the the ages of 41 and 60 years although just 31 candidates were renewal of independence in 1991 were held on Saturday under 20 years of age, refl ecting the dire demographic trends 5 June 2021. Both citizens of Latvia and other European Un- affl icting Latvia’s regions over the last three decades. ion Member States resident in Latvia and registered in a mu- nicipality 90 days before the election were eligible to vote. In a sense, these elections were far more “local” than those While turnout fell dramatically from 50.4% in the previous in previous years. An early municipal election was held in 2017 vote to just 34% in 2021, those who did bother to vote Latvia’s capital city Rīga in August 2020 after a series of cor- tended to support political continuity, particularly in Latvia’s ruption scandals had engulfed the municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Latvian Government on the Visit to Latvia Carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
    CPT/Inf (2013) 20 Report to the Latvian Government on the visit to Latvia carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 5 to 15 September 2011 The Latvian Government has requested the publication of this report and of its responses. The Government’s responses are set out in document CPT/Inf (2013) 21. Strasbourg, 27 August 2013 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................5 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................5 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................6 C. Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered...................................7 D. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .........................8 E. Monitoring of places of deprivation of liberty........................................................................8 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ................................9 A. Police establishments ................................................................................................................9 1. Preliminary remarks ..........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Venue: National Library of Latvia (11Th Floor, Discussion Room “Kore”, Address: Mūkusalas Iela 3, Riga)
    AD HOC COMMTTEE OF EXPERTS ON ROMA1 AND TRAVELLER ISSUES (CAHROM) THEMATIC VISIT ON ROMA INTEGRATION, POLICY DEVELOPMENTS AND COORDINATION PRACTICES IN COUNTRIES WITH A SMALL ROMA POPULATION FINAL AGENDA Riga-Jelgava-Jurmala, Latvia 3-5 October 2018 1st day, Wednesday, 3 October 2018 Venue: National Library of Latvia (11th floor, discussion room “Kore”, address: Mūkusalas iela 3, Riga) 09:00-09:30 Registration and coffee 09:30-11:00 Opening words and presentation of the purpose of the CAHROM thematic visit Moderator: Ms Sanita RANCĀNE-DELEKOLE, Head of the Department of Society Integration of the Ministry of Culture 09:30-09:45 Welcome speech Ms Zane Vāgnere, Deputy of State Secretary on Integration and Media Issues of the Ministry of Culture 09:45-10:15 Introduction into the work of CAHROM thematic work and context and the expectations of the visit Ms Malgorzata ROZYCKA, Mr Michael GUET, Roma and Travellers Team, Council of Europe 10:15-11:00 Coordination of Roma integration Policy in Latvia Mr Deniss KRETALOVS, National Roma Contact Point, Department of Society Integration of the Ministry of Culture 11:00-11:30 Coffee break 11:30-16:30 Coordination of Roma integration policy: national experts’ exchange on approach to coordination Moderator: Michael GUET, Roma and Travellers Team, Council of Europe 11:30-12:00 Roma integration policy and coordination in Lithuania Ms Gražina SLUŠKO, Chief Specialist, Relations with National Communities Division, Department of National minorities under the Government of the Republic of Lithuania, 1 The term “Roma and Travellers” is used at the Council of Europe to encompass the wide diversity of the groups covered by the work of the Council of Europe in this field: on the one hand a) Roma, Sinti/Manush, Calé, Kaale, Romanichals, Boyash/Rudari; b) Balkan Egyptians (Egyptians and Ashkali); c) Eastern groups (Dom, Lom and Abdal); and, on the other hand, groups such as Travellers, Yenish, and the populations designated under the administrative term “Gens du voyage”, as well as persons who identify themselves as Gypsies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Convergence Processes of Social-Economic Security Indicators in Latvian Municipalities
    JOURNAL OF SECURITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ISSN 2029-7017 print/ISSN 2029-7025 online 2019 December Volume 9 Number 2 http://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.2(23) ASSESSMENT OF CONVERGENCE PROCESSES OF SOCIAL-ECONOMIC SECURITY INDICATORS IN LATVIAN MUNICIPALITIES Andrey Smirnov ˡ, Olga Lavrinenko2, Alina Ohotina3, Halina Shmarlouskaya4, Alina Betlej5 1Daugavpils University, Parades Str. 1-331, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia 2, 3Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Daugavpils University, Parades Str. 1-421, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia 4Sociology and Economy Department, Daugavpils University, Parades Str. 1-331, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia International Business Department, Belarusian State Economic University, 2 20070, 26, Partizanski Av, Minsk, Republic of Belarus 5Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland E-mails: ˡ[email protected]; ²[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Received 16 January 2019; accepted 26 Novemeber 2019; published 30 December 2019 Abstract. The aim of the research is to assess convergence processes of a social-economic security indicator in Latvian municipalities and its components in the period 2011 – 2015, calculated as an integral indicator on the basis of primary statistical indicators. The relevance of the research is determined by the fact that social-economic security establishes not only the sustainable economic development of the country as a whole, but also the state of protection from internal and external threats. Municipalities, implementing their autonomous functions, are primary guarantors of social-economic security of the people. The convergence of social-economic security of municipalities implies the process of their convergence in time according to the values of the level of social-economic security1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report
    Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report Mobility Plan Riga and Pieriga Tornu iela 4, III C, office no. 203 Riga, LV-1050 Latvia Phone: +371 7 223 144 Fax: +371 7 223 830 INDEX P. ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Framework 1 1.2. Project background 1 1.3. Objectives of the RPMP 2 1.4. Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 1.5. SEA Scoping 5 1.6. Consultation meetings 5 1.7. Relation SEA and RPMP 6 1.8. Contents of the report 6 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. SEA Directive 7 2.2. Other EU regulations 8 2.3. Other international conventions 11 2.4. Latvian regulations 11 2.4.1. SEA regulations 11 2.4.2. Other relevant Latvian regulations 14 2.4.3. Latvian transport development policy documents 16 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 17 3.1. Introduction 17 3.2. About Riga and Pieriga 17 3.3. Climate, air, water, soil and the landscape 18 3.3.1. Climate 18 3.3.2. Air 19 3.3.3. Noise 25 3.3.4. Water 30 3.3.5. Landscape and soil 30 3.4. Flora and fauna 31 3.4.1. Biological diversity 31 3.4.2. Special protected areas 31 3.5. Cultural heritage 32 4. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 33 4.1. The study area 33 4.2. Socio-economic characteristics 35 4.3. The policy framework 37 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Indicators for Sustainable Development of Small Towns: the Case of Valmiera Municipality
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Computer Science 26 ( 2013 ) 21 – 32 ICTE in Regional Development, December 2013, Valmiera, Latvia Selecting indicators for sustainable development of small towns: The case of Valmiera municipality Valtenbergs Visvaldisa*, González Ainhoab, Piziks Ralfsc a Sociotechnical Systems Engineering Institute of Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Cesu Street 4, Valmiera, LV-4200, Latvia b National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis International Centre for Local and Regional Development National University of Ireland Maynooth c Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Latvia Abstract Although much has been written about sustainable development of cities, the debate over the role of small towns as engines in rural development is just beginning to emerge. In the light of the post-recession austerity climate and new a planning period of EU Cohesion Policy it is important to examine the strategic dimensions of sustainable town development. The paper proposes and applies methodology for selecting sustainable development indicators. The study presents a case study of the town Valmiera in North Eastern Latvia. During a stakeholder facilitated indicator selection process 108 indicators from economic, environmental and social dimensions were assessed and filtered leading to a key indicator set of 15. The indicators are grouped according to development themes and reviewed in the light of conceptual and implementation qualities. Review of the sustainable development indicators and the methodology of indicator selection proposed in this publication constitute inputs for creating future based models of sustainable small town development. © 2013 TheThe Authors. Authors. Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. B.V. Selection andand peer-review peer-review under under responsibility responsibility of ofthe the Sociotechnical Sociotechnical Systems Systems Engineering Engineering Institute Institute of Vidzeme of Vidzeme University University of Appliedof Applied Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Jelgava SEAP
    APPROVED by the decision of Jelgava City Council No. 14/4 dated 25.11.2010. SUSTANABLE ENERGY ACTION PLAN of Jelgava City for the years 2010 – 2020 Jelgava 2010 SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ACTION PLAN OF JELGAVA CITY FOR YEARS 2010-2020 Jelgavas pilsētas Ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas rīcības plāns 2010. – 2020. gadam CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1. EU main approaches for implementation of sustainable energy policy in the cities 4 1.2. Linkage of the Action Plan with the strategic planning documents of Jelgava city 5 1.3. Long – term vision of Jelgava city for development of sustainable energy policy 6 1.4. Overall CO2 reduction target 6 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF JELGAVA CITY 8 2.1. Location, business profile and demographical situation 8 2.2. Buildings 10 2.3. Characteristics of primary resources 13 2.4. Heat supply 18 2.5. Electricity supply 21 2.6. Transport 25 3. CONDITIONS FOR CALCULTATION OF EMISSIONS 27 3.1. Methodology of calculation of emissions 27 3.2. Data for calculations of emissions 29 3.3. Calculation results of Jelgava CO2 emissions for time period of 1995-2008 and 30 choice of a baseline year 3.3.1. Energy production and consumption in Jelgava city in 2005 31 3.3.2. Measures for improvement of energy efficiency 32 3.3.3. Heat supply 35 3.3.4. Electricity supply 38 3.3.5. Transport 39 4. MEASURES OF REDUCTION OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION, IMPROVEMENT OF ENERGY EEFICIENCY AND USAGE OF RENEWABLE ENERG FOR 2010 - 2020 41 5. ESTIMATES OF CO2 EMISSIONS FOR 2010.–2020 AND MEASURES FOR REDUCTION OF THE EMISSIONS 48 6.
    [Show full text]