DOCSLIB.ORG

The Involvement of the Neuropeptides Orexins (Hypocretins) In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Involvement of the Neuropeptides Orexins (Hypocretins) In The involvement of the neuropeptides orexins (hypocretins) in fear and anxiety in rats exposed to a single episode of footshocks By Xiaoyu Chen A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba In partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Oral Biology Faculty of Dentistry University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Copyright © 2013 by Xiaoyu Chen Abstract Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric condition that can develop when people experience a stressful and life-threatening event. Clinical research indicates that the presence of a state of hyperarousal after a traumatic experience is the best predictor of a subsequent diagnosis of PTSD. The role of arousal peptides called orexins (hypocretins) in a PTSD-like condition produced by exposing rats to a single episode of footshocks (5× 2 s episodes of 1.5 mA) was investigated in this thesis. The first part of my thesis involves the characterization of the footshock model of PTSD and the second part examines the involvement of orexins in this footshock model. The following findings are reported. First, shock rats that exhibited a high level of anxiety to a novel tone (high responders, HR) the day after the footshock exposure subsequently displayed more avoidance when compared to shock rats that exhibited a low level of anxiety (low responders, LR). These results highlight the importance of individual differences in the reaction to a strong fear-inducing experience. Second, the orexin precursor peptide prepro-orexin (ppOX) mRNA was found to be elevated in rats at 6 and 14 days after exposure to footshocks. In addition, ppOX mRNA levels were found to be positively correlated with anxiety at 14 days post-shock. Third, pre-shock injections of the corticotropin releasing factor receptor antagonist antalarmin were found to attenuate the anxiety expressed to the shock chamber and eliminate the correlation between ppOX mRNA levels and anxiety. Fourth, systemic injections of the nonselective orexin receptor antagonist TCS-1102 was found to attenuate the anxiety expressed in rats at 14 days post-shock. Fifth, TCS-1102 was found to have anxiolytic effects that were specific i for the HR. The results of these experiments provide evidence linking the orexin system to the anxiety produced by exposure of rats to footshocks. They also provide preclinical evidence in support of the use of orexin antagonists for the treatment of anxiety in PTSD. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Gilbert J. Kirouac who gives me this opportunity to work in his laboratory and pursue my Ph.D. degree. Dr. Kirouac kindly provided academic and financial support during my graduate student period. His mentorship inspiration and efforts in interpreting data and writing have been invaluable for my research studies. I also want to give my appreciation to my lab members: Sa Li, Yonghui Li, Benjemin Rogala, Jiale Yu, and Huiying Wang who offered great help during my Ph.D. training. I would like to thank my committee members: Dr. J. Elliott Scott, Dr. Hugo T. Bergen, and Dr. Mark Fry for the guidance and insightful advices they have provided over the course of my studies. Special thank to Dr. Hugo T. Bergen who taught me how to do in situ hybridization. Great gratitude is also given towards all people Department of Oral in Biology for their friendly help. I would like to thank Faculty of Graduate Studies for the International Graduate Student Entrance Scholarships, International Graduate Student Scholarship, and the Graduate Student Travel Awards, as well as the Manitoba Health Research Council which awards me Doctoral Graduate Studentship for my doctoral studies. I want to give my great appreciation towards my mom, Guorong Chen, and my dad, Anhuai Xiong for their support and encouragement to pursue my interests. A special thank to dear Ang Gao for your love and supports. iii Dedication To my mom, Guorong Chen. 谨将此论文献给我的母亲陈国荣女士。 iv Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... iii Dedication .................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................v List of Figures ............................................................................................................. xii List of Tables...............................................................................................................xiv Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... xv Chapter 1 Introduction..................................................................................................1 1.1. General Introduction .............................................................................................1 1.2. Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) .................................................................7 1.2.1. Symptoms and Progression ............................................................................7 1.2.2. Individual Differences in PTSD .....................................................................9 1.2.3. Fear and PTSD ............................................................................................. 11 1.2.4. HPA Axis and PTSD.................................................................................... 14 1.2.5. Exposure Therapy and Pharmacological Treatments for PTSD ..................... 17 1.2.6. Footshock Model of PTSD ........................................................................... 19 v 1.3. Orexins in the Regulation of Arousal, Stress, and Negative Emotions ................. 22 1.3.1. Orexin Peptides, Receptors, and Distribution ............................................... 22 1.3.2. Orexins in the Regulation of Arousal ............................................................ 24 1.3.3. Orexins in the Regulation of Stress .............................................................. 25 1.3.4. Orexins in the Regulation of Fear and Anxiety ............................................. 28 1.4. Objectives .......................................................................................................... 30 1.5. Hypotheses ......................................................................................................... 31 1.5.1. Hypothesis 1: Early Fear Response Predicts Anxiety.................................... 31 1.5.2. Hypothesis 2: Extinction of Fear to the Shock Chamber Attenuates Novelty Fear ........................................................................................................................ 32 1.5.3. Hypothesis 3: Footshocks Produce a Lasting Upregulation of ppOX Synthesis ............................................................................................................................... 32 1.5.4. Hypothesis 4: More Orexin Neurons are Activated in Shock Rats Placed in Situations Involving Fear. ....................................................................................... 33 1.5.5. Hypothesis 5: Blocking of CRF Receptor-1 Attenuates ppOX mRNA Synthesis and Fear Expression in Rats that Received Footshocks ............................ 34 1.5.6. Hypothesis 6: Blocking of Orexin Receptors Attenuates Fear And Anxiety ............................................................................................................................... 34 1.5.7. Hypothesis 7: Blocking of Orexin Receptors Attenuates Anxiety in a Subgroup of Shock Rats with High Levels of Anxiety ............................................ 35 vi Chapter 2 Materials and Methods .............................................................................. 36 2.1. Animals .............................................................................................................. 36 2.2. Handling and Testing ......................................................................................... 36 2.3. Footshock Procedure .......................................................................................... 37 2.4. A Rat Model of PTSD ........................................................................................ 38 2.4.1. Acute Fear Response to Novel Environment ................................................ 38 2.4.2. Fear Response to Novel Chambers and the Shock Chamber ......................... 38 2.4.3. Social Approach and Avoidance Test ........................................................... 40 2.4.4. Defensive Withdrawal Test .......................................................................... 41 2.4.5. Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................... 41 2.5. Fear Extinction Experiment ................................................................................ 42 2.5.1. Fear Extinction Training .............................................................................. 42 2.5.2. Effects of Extinction on Fear Response to Novel Environment ...................... 44 2.5.3. Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................... 45 2.6. Effects of Footshocks on ppOX mRNA Levels ..................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orexin Receptor Antagonists As Therapeutic Agents for Insomnia
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 25 December 2013 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00163 Orexin receptor antagonists as therapeutic agents for insomnia Ana C. Equihua 1, Alberto K. De La Herrán-Arita 2 and Rene Drucker-Colin 1* 1 Neuropatología Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México 2 Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA Edited by: Insomnia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty initiating or maintaining Christopher J. Winrow, Merck, USA sleep, or non-restorative sleep with impairment of daytime functioning. Currently, Reviewed by: treatment for insomnia involves a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBTi) Matthew R. Ebben, Weill Medical and pharmacological therapy. Among pharmacological interventions, the most evidence College of Cornell University, USA Gabriella Gobbi, McGill University, exists for benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonist drugs (GABAA receptor), although Canada concerns persist regarding their safety and their limited efficacy. The use of these Matt Carter, University of hypnotic medications must be carefully monitored for adverse effects. Orexin (hypocretin) Washington, USA neuropeptides have been shown to regulate transitions between wakefulness and Michihiro Mieda, Kanazawa University, Japan sleep by promoting cholinergic/monoaminergic neural pathways. This has led to the *Correspondence: development of a new class of pharmacological agents that antagonize the physiological Rene Drucker-Colin, Departamento effects of orexin. The development of these agents may lead to novel therapies for de Neurociencias, Instituto de insomnia without the side effect profile of hypnotics (e.g., impaired cognition, disturbed Fisiología Celular, Universidad arousal, and motor balance difficulties). However, antagonizing a system that regulates Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito exterior S/N, Apdo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Nonpeptide Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Antalarmin on Behavioral and Endocrine Responses to Stress*
    0013-7227/99/$03.00/0 Vol. 140, No. 1 Endocrinology Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society The Impact of the Nonpeptide Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Antalarmin on Behavioral and Endocrine Responses to Stress* TERRENCE DEAK, KIEN T. NGUYEN, ANDREA L. EHRLICH, LINDA R. WATKINS, ROBERT L. SPENCER, STEVEN F. MAIER, JULIO LICINIO, MA-LI WONG, GEORGE P. CHROUSOS, ELIZABETH WEBSTER, AND PHILIP W. GOLD Department of Psychology (T.D., K.T.N., A.L.E., L.R.W., R.L.S., S.F.M.), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0345; Clinical Neuroendocrinology Branch (J.L., M.-L.W., P.W.G.), National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1284; and Developmental Neuroendocrinology Branch (G.P.C., E.W.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1284 ABSTRACT Furthermore, because rats previously exposed to inescapable shock The nonpeptide CRH antagonist antalarmin has been shown to (IS; 100 shocks, 1.6 mA, 5 sec each), demonstrate enhanced fear block both behavioral and endocrine responses to CRH. However, it’s conditioning, we investigated whether this effect would be blocked by potential activity in blunting behavioral and endocrine sequelae of antalarmin. Antalarmin (20 mg/kgz2 ml ip) impaired both the induc- stressor exposure has not been assessed. Because antagonism of cen- tion and expression of conditioned fear. In addition, antalarmin tral CRH by a-helical CRH attenuates conditioned fear responses, we blocked the enhancement of fear conditioning produced by prior ex- sought to test antalarmin in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Effects of Stress on Drug Addiction
    Making a bad thing worse: adverse effects of stress on drug addiction Jessica N. Cleck, Julie A. Blendy J Clin Invest. 2008;118(2):454-461. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI33946. Review Series Sustained exposure to various psychological stressors can exacerbate neuropsychiatric disorders, including drug addiction. Addiction is a chronic brain disease in which individuals cannot control their need for drugs, despite negative health and social consequences. The brains of addicted individuals are altered and respond very differently to stress than those of individuals who are not addicted. In this Review, we highlight some of the common effects of stress and drugs of abuse throughout the addiction cycle. We also discuss both animal and human studies that suggest treating the stress- related aspects of drug addiction is likely to be an important contributing factor to a long-lasting recovery from this disorder. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/33946/pdf Review series Making a bad thing worse: adverse effects of stress on drug addiction Jessica N. Cleck and Julie A. Blendy Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Sustained exposure to various psychological stressors can exacerbate neuropsychiatric disorders, including drug addiction. Addiction is a chronic brain disease in which individuals cannot control their need for drugs, despite negative health and social consequences. The brains of addicted individuals are altered and respond very differently to stress than those of individuals who are not addicted. In this Review, we highlight some of the common effects of stress and drugs of abuse throughout the addiction cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/072852 Al 21 May 2015 (21.05.2015) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 36/84 (2006.01) A61K 31/5513 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/045 (2006.01) A61P 31/22 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A61K 31/522 (2006.01) A61K 45/06 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, PCT/NL20 14/050780 KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (22) International Filing Date: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, 13 November 2014 (13.1 1.2014) PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (25) Filing Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/903,430 13 November 2013 (13. 11.2013) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: RJG DEVELOPMENTS B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropeptides: Implications for Alcoholism
    Journal of Neurochemistry, 2004, 89, 273–285 doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02394.x REVIEW Neuropeptides: implications for alcoholism Michael S. Cowen*, , Feng Chen*, and Andrew J. Lawrence*, *The Howard Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, VIC 3800 Australia Abstract (CRF), urocortin I and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in deleterious The role of neuromodulatory peptides in the aetiology of and excessive alcohol consumption, focussing on specific alcoholism has been relatively under-explored; however, the brain regions, in particular the central nucleus of the development of selective ligands for neuropeptide receptors, amygdala, that appear to be implicated in the pathophysi- the characterization and cloning of receptors, and the ology of alcoholism. The review also outlines potential development of transgenic mouse models have greatly directions for further research to clarify neuropeptide facilitated this analysis. The present review considers the involvement in neuromodulation within discrete brain nuclei most recent preclinical evidence obtained from animal pertinent to behavioural patterns. models for the role of two of the opioid peptides, namely J. Neurochem. (2004) 89, 273–285. b-endorphin and enkephalin; corticotropin-releasing factor Alcohol causes as much, if not more death and disabilityas analysis. However, drugs that interact with neuropeptide measles, malaria, tobacco or illegal drugs (World Health systems have great potential in the pharmacotherapy of Organization, 2001) . In economic terms, alcohol abuse has alcoholism: witness the widespread (although somewhat less been estimated at US$167 billion per year; however, ‘in than satisfactory) use of the opioid antagonist naltrexone in human terms, the costs are incalculable’ (National Institute the treatment of alcoholism (O’Malley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • OREXIN ANTAGONISTS BELSOMRA (Suvorexant), DAYVIGO (Lemborexant)
    OREXIN ANTAGONISTS BELSOMRA (suvorexant), DAYVIGO (lemborexant) RATIONALE FOR INCLUSION IN PA PROGRAM Background Belsomra (suvorexant) and Dayvigo (lemborexant) are orexin receptor antagonists used to treat difficulty in falling and staying asleep (insomnia). Orexins are chemicals that are involved in regulating the sleep-wake cycle and play a role in keeping people awake (1-2). Regulatory Status FDA-approved indication: Orexin receptor antagonists are indicated for the treatment of insomnia, characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance (1-2). Orexin Antagonists are contraindicated in patients with narcolepsy (1-2). Orexin Antagonists are central nervous system (CNS) depressants that can impair daytime wakefulness even when used as prescribed. Medications that treat insomnia can cause next-day drowsiness and impair driving and other activities that require alertness. Orexin Antagonists can impair driving skills and may increase the risk of falling asleep while driving. People can be impaired even when they feel fully awake. Patients should also be made aware of the potential for next-day driving impairment, because there is individual variation in sensitivity to the drug (1-2). The failure of insomnia to remit after 7 to 10 days of treatment may indicate the presence of a primary psychiatric and/or mental illness that should be evaluated (1-2). Warnings and precautions that should be discussed with the patient on Orexin Antagonist therapy include adverse reactions on abnormal thinking and behavioral changes (such as amnesia, anxiety, hallucinations and other neuropsychiatric symptoms), complex behaviors (such as sleep- driving, preparing and eating food, or making phone calls), dose-dependent increase in suicidal ideation, and sleep paralysis which is the inability to move or speak for up to several minutes during sleep-wake transitions (1-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Merck & Co., Inc
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2021 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 _________________________________ FORM 10-K (MARK ONE) ☒ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2020 OR ☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 1-6571 _________________________________ Merck & Co., Inc. 2000 Galloping Hill Road Kenilworth New Jersey 07033 (908) 740-4000 New Jersey 22-1918501 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (I.R.S Employer Identification No.) Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on which Registered Common Stock ($0.50 par value) MRK New York Stock Exchange 1.125% Notes due 2021 MRK/21 New York Stock Exchange 0.500% Notes due 2024 MRK 24 New York Stock Exchange 1.875% Notes due 2026 MRK/26 New York Stock Exchange 2.500% Notes due 2034 MRK/34 New York Stock Exchange 1.375% Notes due 2036 MRK 36A New York Stock Exchange Number of shares of Common Stock ($0.50 par value) outstanding as of January 31, 2021: 2,530,315,668. Aggregate market value of Common Stock ($0.50 par value) held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2020 based on closing price on June 30, 2020: $195,461,000,000. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Orexin Receptor System in Stress, Sleep and Cocaine Use
    Role of the orexin receptor system in stress, sleep and cocaine use NCT02785406 Version Date: 04/25/2017 IRB NUMBER: HSC-MS-16-0120 IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/25/2017 Title: Role of the orexin receptor system in stress, sleep and cocaine use Principal Investigator: Scott D. Lane Co-Investigators: Joy M. Schmitz, Charles E. Green, Jin H. Yoon, Michael F. Weaver ABSTRACT Preclinical research has established important functions for the orexin system in mediating arousal/sleep, stress, and cue-induced reinstatement of drug taking (e.g., relapse). The role of stress/anxiety and drug cue reactivity in human drug relapse is well established, but to date, the role of the orexin system in modulating these phenomena has not been examined in humans with substance use disorders (e.g., cocaine). The goal of the present first-in-human study will be to examine the effects of an orexin antagonist (suvorexant) on interactions among stress/anxiety, sleep, and drug-cue reactivity. We will utilize a battery of highly sensitive, drug-specific, laboratory measures of drug cue reactivity (a relapse risk model), and well-established metrics of stress/anxiety and sleep. We hypothesize that antagonism of the orexin system will attenuate the link between (1) stress/anxiety and drug cue reactivity, and (2) sleep and drug cue reactivity. These results will elucidate a unique biochemical mechanism for understanding relapse, and provide a potential medication target for relapse prevention SCIENTIFIC IMPACT Given the promising preclinical data on the orexin system in modulating sleep, anxiety, and drug cue reactivity, this research project has high translational scientific value.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential PET Ligands for Imaging of Cerebral VPAC and PAC Receptors: Are NonPeptide Small Molecules Superior to Peptide Compounds?
    World Journal of Neuroscience, 2015, 5, 364384 Published Online November 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/wjns http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wjns.2015.55036 Potential PET Ligands for Imaging of Cerebral VPAC and PAC Receptors: Are NonPeptide Small Molecules Superior to Peptide Compounds? Margit Pissarek INM5, Nuclear Chemistry, Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine, Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany Received 15 August 2015; accepted 13 November 2015; published 17 November 2015 Copyright © 2015 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have been known for decades to mediate neuroendocrine and vasodilative actions via Gprotein coupled receptors of Class B. These are targets of imaging probes for positron emission tomogra phy (PET) or single photon emission tomography (SPECT) in tumor diagnostics and tumor grading. However, they play only a subordinate role in the development of tracers for brain imaging. Diffi culties in development of nonpeptide ligands typical for cerebral receptors of PACAP and VIP are shared by all members of Class B receptor family. Essential landmarks have been confirmed for understanding of structural details of Class B receptor molecular signalling during the last five years. High relevance in the explanation of problems in ligand development for these receptors is admitted to the large Nterminal ectodomain markedly different from Class A receptor binding sites and poorly suitable as orthosteric binding sites for the most smallmolecule compounds. The present study is focused on the recently available receptor ligands for PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors as well as potential smallmolecule lead structures suitable for use in PET or SPECT.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Dopamine D1-Family Receptors in Relapse to High-Fat Food Seeking Induced by the Anxiogenic Drug Yohimbine
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2011) 36, 497–510 & 2011 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/11 $32.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Role of Dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Dopamine D1-Family Receptors in Relapse to High-Fat Food Seeking Induced by the Anxiogenic Drug Yohimbine 1 1 1 1 1 Sunila G Nair , Brittany M Navarre , Carlo Cifani , Charles L Pickens , Jennifer M Bossert and Yavin Shaham*,1 1 Behavioral Neuroscience Branch, NIDA/IRP/NIH/DHHS, Baltimore, MD, USA In humans, relapse to maladaptive eating habits during dieting is often provoked by stress. In rats, the anxiogenic drug yohimbine, which causes stress-like responses in both humans and nonhumans, reinstates food seeking in a relapse model. In this study, we examined the role of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dopamine D1-family receptors, previously implicated in stress-induced reinstatement of drug seeking, in yohimbine-induced reinstatement of food seeking. We trained food-restricted rats to lever press for 35% high-fat pellets every other day (9–15 sessions, 3 h each); pellet delivery was accompanied by a discrete tone-light cue. We then extinguished operant responding for 10–16 days by removing the pellets. Subsequently, we examined the effect of yohimbine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) on reinstatement of food seeking and Fos (a neuronal activity marker) induction in mPFC. We then examined the effect of systemic injections of the D1-family receptor antagonist SCH23390 (10 mg/kg, s.c.) on yohimbine-induced reinstatement and Fos induction, and that of mPFC SCH23390 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/side) injections on this reinstatement.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein‐Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2019) 176, S21–S141 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1 , Arthur Christopoulos2 , Anthony P Davenport3 , Eamonn Kelly4, Alistair Mathie5 , John A Peters6 , Emma L Veale5 ,JaneFArmstrong7 , Elena Faccenda7 ,SimonDHarding7 ,AdamJPawson7 , Joanna L Sharman7 , Christopher Southan7 , Jamie A Davies7 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK 2Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia 3Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK 4School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK 5Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Greenwich and Kent at Medway, Anson Building, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK 6Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK 7Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website.
    [Show full text]