13208 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices

(1.) Document No. GC–10–281 Comprehensive Environmental The Settlement Agreement also concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–722 Response, Compensation, and Liability resolves civil penalty claims for failure (Certain Automotive Vehicles and Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, to maintain adequate financial Designs Therefore). and the Resource Conservation and assurance for closure, post-closure and (2.) Document No. GC–11–011 Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6901 third party liability pursuant to RCRA concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–568 et seq. with respect to the following Sections 3004(a) and (t), 42 U.S.C. (Remand)(Certain Products and sites: 6924(a) and (t) with respect to the Pharmaceutical Compositions 1. The Casmalia Resources Superfund Site following facilities: Containing Recombinant Human in California; 1. /Luxury Car Engineering and Erythropoetin). 2. The Operating Industries, Inc. Landfill Manufacturing, (Formerly Fiero), , (3.) Document No. GC–11–013 Superfund Site in California; Michigan. concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–587 3. The Army Creek Landfill Superfund Site 2. Cadillac/Luxury Car Engineering and (Remand)(Certain Connecting Devices in ; Manufacturing, Flint, Michigan; (‘‘Quick Clamps’’) for Use with Modular 4. The Delaware Sand & Gravel Superfund 3. GM Former Allison Gas Turbine (AGT) Compressed Air Conditioning Units, Site in Delaware; Division, Indianapolis, Indiana; 5. The Lake Calumet Superfund Site in 4. GM Locomotive Group, LaGrange, Including Filters, Regulators, and Illinois; Illinois; Lubricators (‘‘FRL’s’’) That are Part of 6. The Waukegan Manufactured Gas & 5. GM Powertrain Group, Defiance, Ohio; Larger Pneumatic Systems and the FRL Coke Plant Superfund Site in Illinois; 6. GM Truck Group, Shreveport, Louisiana; Units They Connect). 7. The Doepke Holliday Disposal 7. GMC GM Technical Center, Warren, (4.) Document No. GC–11–045 Superfund Site in Kansas; Michigan; concerning Inv. No. 1205–9 (Certain 8. The 68th Street Dump Superfund Site in 8. Lansing Automotive Division, Festive Articles). Maryland; Lordstown, Ohio; In accordance with Commission 9. The Maryland Sand, Gravel, and Stone 9. Powertrain Group Saginaw Metal Superfund Site in Maryland; Castings, Saginaw, Michigan; policy, subject matter listed above, not 10. The Spectron Superfund Site in 10. Worldwide Facilities Group—MFD, disposed of at the scheduled meeting, Maryland; Lordstown, Ohio; may be carried over to the agenda of the 11. The Dearborn Refining Site in 11. Worldwide Facilities Group, Anderson, following meeting. Earlier Notification Michigan; Indiana; of this meeting was not possible. 12. The Flint West a/k/a Chevy in The Hole 12. Worldwide Facilities Group, Coldwater Site in Michigan; Road, Flint, Michigan; By order of the Commission. 13. The Forest Waste Disposal Superfund 13. Worldwide Facilities Group, Elyria, Issued: March 7, 2011. Site in Michigan; Ohio; and William R. Bishop, 14. The H. Brown Company Superfund Site 14. Worldwide Facilities Group, Moraine, Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. in Michigan; Ohio. 15. The Reclamation Oil Company Site in [FR Doc. 2011–5676 Filed 3–8–11; 4:15 pm] The Settlement Agreement also Michigan; resolves civil penalty claims resulting BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 16. The Rose Township Dump Superfund Site in Michigan; from RCRA inspections at the following 17. The Springfield Township Dump automotive assembly plants: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Superfund Site in Michigan; 1. The Pontiac East Assembly Plant, also 18. The Ventron/Velsicol Superfund Site in known as the ‘‘ Center,’’ Notice of Lodging of Settlement New Jersey; 2100 South Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan; Agreement Under the Clean Air Act, 19. The Atlantic Resources Corporation 2. The Orion Assembly Plant, 4555 Comprehensive Environmental Superfund Site in New Jersey; Giddings Road, Lake Orion, Michigan; Response, Compensation, and Liability 20. The Sealand Restoration Inc. 3. The Moraine Assembly Plant, 2601 West Superfund Site in New York; Stroop Road, Moraine, Ohio; Act and the Resource Conservation 21. The Tri-Cities Barrel Superfund Site in 4. The Plant, 801 and Recovery Act New York; Boxwood, Wilmington, Delaware; 22. The Massena Superfund Site in New Notice is hereby given that on March 5. The Doraville Facility, 3900 Motors York; Industrial Way, Doraville, Georgia; 4, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree and 23. The Mercury Refining Superfund Site 6. The Fairfax Assembly Plant, 3201 Settlement Agreement (the ‘‘Non-Owned located in New York; Fairfax Trafficway, Kansas City, Kansas; Site Settlement Agreement’’) in the 24. The Tremont City Barrel Fill Site in 7. The Wentzville Assembly Plant, 1500 bankruptcy matter, Motors Liquidation Ohio; East Route ‘‘A,’’ Wentzville, Missouri; and Corp, et al., f/k/a Corp., 25. The Cardington Road Superfund Site in 8. The GM Plant, et al., Jointly Administered Case No. Ohio; 401 N. Verlinden Avenue, Lansing, 09–50026 (REG), was lodged with the 26. The Ford Road Landfill Superfund Site Michigan. United States Bankruptcy Court for the in Ohio; Finally, the Settlement Agreement 27. The Valleycrest Landfill Site in Ohio; Southern District of New York. The 28. The South Dayton Dump & Landfill resolves civil penalty claims under the Parties to the Non-Owned Site Superfund Site in Ohio; Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’) 42 U.S.C. 7401– Settlement Agreement are debtors 29. The Chemical Recovery Systems Site in 7671q with respect to manufacturing Motors Liquidation Corporation, Ohio; new automotive engines and selling or formerly known as General Motors 30. The Lammers Barrel Superfund Site in introducing them into commerce.Under Corporation, Remediation and Liability Ohio; the Non-Owned Site Settlement Management Company, Inc., and 31. The Malvern TCE Superfund Site in Agreement, EPA will receive an allowed Environmental Corporate Remediation Pennsylvania; general unsecured claim of $36,290,270 Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Old GM’’) 32. The Tonolli Corporation Superfund for environmental remediation at Site in Pennsylvania; and the United States of America. The 33. The Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting twenty-nine non-owned sites and civil Settlement Agreement resolves claims Corporation Superfund Site in Pennsylvania; penalties for CAA and RCRA violations and causes of action of the and at multi-regional sites. EPA will also Environmental Protection Agency 34. The Breslube-Penn Superfund Site in receive a total cash amount of (‘‘EPA’’) against Old GM under the Pennsylvania. $4,613,322 from bonds, and work up to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:43 Mar 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13209

the amount of $10.5 million in DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– accordance with bond requirements at 307–0827). Antitrust Division six non-owned sites. Patricia A. Brink, The Department of Justice will United States and State of Texas v. Director of Civil Enforcement. receive, for a period of fifteen days from United Regional Health Care System; In the United States District Court for the date of this publication, comments Proposed Final Judgment and relating to the Non-Owned Site the Northern District of Texas, Wichita Competitive Impact Statement Falls Division Settlement Agreement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Notice is hereby given pursuant to the United States of America and State of Texas, Plaintiffs, v. United Regional Attorney General, Environment and Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, Health Care System, Defendant. Natural Resources Division, and either 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h), that a proposed emailed to pubcomment- Case No.: 7:11–cv–00030. Final Judgment, Stipulation and Judge: Reed C. O’Connor. [email protected] or mailed to P.O. Competitive Impact Statement have Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Filed: Feb. 25, 2011. been filed with the United States Description: Antitrust. Washington, DC 20044–7611, and District Court for the Northern District should refer to In re Motors Liquidation of Texas, Wichita Falls Division, in Complaint Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–09754. United States of America and State of The United States of America, acting Commenters may request an Texas v. United Regional Health Care under the direction of the Attorney opportunity for a public meeting in the System, Civil Action No. 7:11–cv– General of the United States, and the affected area, in accordance with 00030–O. On February 25, 2011, the State of Texas, by and through the Texas Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. United States filed a Complaint alleging Attorney General, bring this civil 6973(d). that United Regional Health Care antitrust action to enjoin defendant The Non-Owned Site Settlement System has entered, maintained, and United Regional Health Care System Agreement may be examined at the enforced exclusionary contracts with (‘‘United Regional’’) from entering into, Office of the United States Attorney, 86 commercial insurers that effectively maintaining, or enforcing contracts with Chambers Street, 3rd Floor, New York, prevent those insurers from contracting commercial health insurers that New York 10007, and at the U.S. with United Regional’s competitors in effectively prevent those insurers from Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel violation of Section 2 of the Sherman contracting with United Regional’s Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Act, 15 U.S.C. 2. The proposed Final competitors, in violation of Section 2 of Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Judgment, filed at the same time as the the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2, and to remedy the effects of its unlawful During the public comment period, the Complaint, prohibits United Regional conduct. Plaintiffs allege as follows: Non-Owned Site Settlement Agreement from using agreements with commercial may also be examined on the following health insurers that improperly inhibit I. Nature of the Action Department of Justice Web site, http:// insurers from contracting with United 1. United Regional has monopoly www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ Regional’s competitors. power in two relevant product markets _ Consent Decrees.html. Copies of the Copies of the Complaint, proposed in Wichita Falls, Texas and the Non-Owned Site Settlement Agreement Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact surrounding area: (1) The sale of general may also be obtained by mail from the Statement are available for inspection at acute-care inpatient hospital services Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, the Department of Justice, Antitrust (‘‘inpatient hospital services’’) to U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, Division, Antitrust Documents Group, commercial health insurers, and (2) the DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or 450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 1010, sale of outpatient surgical services to e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– commercial health insurers. United ([email protected]), fax no. 514–2481), on the Department of Regional has an approximately 90% (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation Justice’s Web site at http:// share of the market for inpatient number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of hospital services sold to commercial insurers and a greater than 65% share of copy from the Consent Decree Library, the Clerk of the United States District the market for outpatient surgical please enclose a check in the amount of Court for the Northern District of Texas, $6.75 (25 cents per page reproduction services sold to commercial insurers. Wichita Falls Division. Copies of these All health insurance companies in the cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if materials may be obtained from the by e-mail or fax, please forward a check relevant geographic market consider Antitrust Division upon request and United Regional a ‘‘must-have’’ hospital in that amount to the Consent Decree payment of the copying fee set by Library at the stated address. for health plans because it is by far the Department of Justice regulations. largest hospital in the region and the Maureen Katz, Public comment is invited within 60 only local provider of certain essential Assistant Section Chief, Environmental days of the date of this notice. Such services. Enforcement Section, Environment and comments, and responses thereto, will 2. United Regional has maintained its Natural Resources Division. be published in the Federal Register monopoly power in the relevant markets [FR Doc. 2011–5445 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] and filed with the Court. Comments by entering into contracts with BILLING CODE 4410–15–P should be directed to Joshua H. Soven, commercial health insurers that exclude Chief, Litigation I Section, Antitrust United Regional’s competitors in the Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Wichita Falls area from the insurers’ 450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 4100, health-care provider networks (‘‘exclusionary contracts’’). These exclusionary contracts effectively prevent insurers from contracting with hospitals and other health-care facilities

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:43 Mar 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES