DOCSLIB.ORG

In Re Motors Liquidation Corporation, Et Al Federal Register Notice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Re Motors Liquidation Corporation, Et Al Federal Register Notice 13208 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices (1.) Document No. GC–10–281 Comprehensive Environmental The Settlement Agreement also concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–722 Response, Compensation, and Liability resolves civil penalty claims for failure (Certain Automotive Vehicles and Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, to maintain adequate financial Designs Therefore). and the Resource Conservation and assurance for closure, post-closure and (2.) Document No. GC–11–011 Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6901 third party liability pursuant to RCRA concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–568 et seq. with respect to the following Sections 3004(a) and (t), 42 U.S.C. (Remand)(Certain Products and sites: 6924(a) and (t) with respect to the Pharmaceutical Compositions 1. The Casmalia Resources Superfund Site following facilities: Containing Recombinant Human in California; 1. Cadillac/Luxury Car Engineering and Erythropoetin). 2. The Operating Industries, Inc. Landfill Manufacturing, (Formerly Fiero), Pontiac, (3.) Document No. GC–11–013 Superfund Site in California; Michigan. concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–587 3. The Army Creek Landfill Superfund Site 2. Cadillac/Luxury Car Engineering and (Remand)(Certain Connecting Devices in Delaware; Manufacturing, Flint, Michigan; (‘‘Quick Clamps’’) for Use with Modular 4. The Delaware Sand & Gravel Superfund 3. GM Former Allison Gas Turbine (AGT) Compressed Air Conditioning Units, Site in Delaware; Division, Indianapolis, Indiana; 5. The Lake Calumet Superfund Site in 4. GM Locomotive Group, LaGrange, Including Filters, Regulators, and Illinois; Illinois; Lubricators (‘‘FRL’s’’) That are Part of 6. The Waukegan Manufactured Gas & 5. GM Powertrain Group, Defiance, Ohio; Larger Pneumatic Systems and the FRL Coke Plant Superfund Site in Illinois; 6. GM Truck Group, Shreveport, Louisiana; Units They Connect). 7. The Doepke Holliday Disposal 7. GMC GM Technical Center, Warren, (4.) Document No. GC–11–045 Superfund Site in Kansas; Michigan; concerning Inv. No. 1205–9 (Certain 8. The 68th Street Dump Superfund Site in 8. Lansing Automotive Division, Festive Articles). Maryland; Lordstown, Ohio; In accordance with Commission 9. The Maryland Sand, Gravel, and Stone 9. Powertrain Group Saginaw Metal Superfund Site in Maryland; Castings, Saginaw, Michigan; policy, subject matter listed above, not 10. The Spectron Superfund Site in 10. Worldwide Facilities Group—MFD, disposed of at the scheduled meeting, Maryland; Lordstown, Ohio; may be carried over to the agenda of the 11. The Dearborn Refining Site in 11. Worldwide Facilities Group, Anderson, following meeting. Earlier Notification Michigan; Indiana; of this meeting was not possible. 12. The Flint West a/k/a Chevy in The Hole 12. Worldwide Facilities Group, Coldwater Site in Michigan; Road, Flint, Michigan; By order of the Commission. 13. The Forest Waste Disposal Superfund 13. Worldwide Facilities Group, Elyria, Issued: March 7, 2011. Site in Michigan; Ohio; and William R. Bishop, 14. The H. Brown Company Superfund Site 14. Worldwide Facilities Group, Moraine, Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. in Michigan; Ohio. 15. The Reclamation Oil Company Site in [FR Doc. 2011–5676 Filed 3–8–11; 4:15 pm] The Settlement Agreement also Michigan; resolves civil penalty claims resulting BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 16. The Rose Township Dump Superfund Site in Michigan; from RCRA inspections at the following 17. The Springfield Township Dump automotive assembly plants: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Superfund Site in Michigan; 1. The Pontiac East Assembly Plant, also 18. The Ventron/Velsicol Superfund Site in known as the ‘‘Pontiac Assembly Center,’’ Notice of Lodging of Settlement New Jersey; 2100 South Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan; Agreement Under the Clean Air Act, 19. The Atlantic Resources Corporation 2. The Orion Assembly Plant, 4555 Comprehensive Environmental Superfund Site in New Jersey; Giddings Road, Lake Orion, Michigan; Response, Compensation, and Liability 20. The Sealand Restoration Inc. 3. The Moraine Assembly Plant, 2601 West Superfund Site in New York; Stroop Road, Moraine, Ohio; Act and the Resource Conservation 21. The Tri-Cities Barrel Superfund Site in 4. The Wilmington Assembly Plant, 801 and Recovery Act New York; Boxwood, Wilmington, Delaware; 22. The Massena Superfund Site in New Notice is hereby given that on March 5. The Doraville Facility, 3900 Motors York; Industrial Way, Doraville, Georgia; 4, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree and 23. The Mercury Refining Superfund Site 6. The Fairfax Assembly Plant, 3201 Settlement Agreement (the ‘‘Non-Owned located in New York; Fairfax Trafficway, Kansas City, Kansas; Site Settlement Agreement’’) in the 24. The Tremont City Barrel Fill Site in 7. The Wentzville Assembly Plant, 1500 bankruptcy matter, Motors Liquidation Ohio; East Route ‘‘A,’’ Wentzville, Missouri; and Corp, et al., f/k/a General Motors Corp., 25. The Cardington Road Superfund Site in 8. The GM Lansing Car Assembly Plant, et al., Jointly Administered Case No. Ohio; 401 N. Verlinden Avenue, Lansing, 09–50026 (REG), was lodged with the 26. The Ford Road Landfill Superfund Site Michigan. United States Bankruptcy Court for the in Ohio; Finally, the Settlement Agreement 27. The Valleycrest Landfill Site in Ohio; Southern District of New York. The 28. The South Dayton Dump & Landfill resolves civil penalty claims under the Parties to the Non-Owned Site Superfund Site in Ohio; Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’) 42 U.S.C. 7401– Settlement Agreement are debtors 29. The Chemical Recovery Systems Site in 7671q with respect to manufacturing Motors Liquidation Corporation, Ohio; new automotive engines and selling or formerly known as General Motors 30. The Lammers Barrel Superfund Site in introducing them into commerce.Under Corporation, Remediation and Liability Ohio; the Non-Owned Site Settlement Management Company, Inc., and 31. The Malvern TCE Superfund Site in Agreement, EPA will receive an allowed Environmental Corporate Remediation Pennsylvania; general unsecured claim of $36,290,270 Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Old GM’’) 32. The Tonolli Corporation Superfund for environmental remediation at Site in Pennsylvania; and the United States of America. The 33. The Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting twenty-nine non-owned sites and civil Settlement Agreement resolves claims Corporation Superfund Site in Pennsylvania; penalties for CAA and RCRA violations and causes of action of the and at multi-regional sites. EPA will also Environmental Protection Agency 34. The Breslube-Penn Superfund Site in receive a total cash amount of (‘‘EPA’’) against Old GM under the Pennsylvania. $4,613,322 from bonds, and work up to VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:43 Mar 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13209 the amount of $10.5 million in DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– accordance with bond requirements at 307–0827). Antitrust Division six non-owned sites. Patricia A. Brink, The Department of Justice will United States and State of Texas v. Director of Civil Enforcement. receive, for a period of fifteen days from United Regional Health Care System; In the United States District Court for the date of this publication, comments Proposed Final Judgment and relating to the Non-Owned Site the Northern District of Texas, Wichita Competitive Impact Statement Falls Division Settlement Agreement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Notice is hereby given pursuant to the United States of America and State of Texas, Plaintiffs, v. United Regional Attorney General, Environment and Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, Health Care System, Defendant. Natural Resources Division, and either 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h), that a proposed emailed to pubcomment- Case No.: 7:11–cv–00030. Final Judgment, Stipulation and Judge: Reed C. O’Connor. [email protected] or mailed to P.O. Competitive Impact Statement have Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Filed: Feb. 25, 2011. been filed with the United States Description: Antitrust. Washington, DC 20044–7611, and District Court for the Northern District should refer to In re Motors Liquidation of Texas, Wichita Falls Division, in Complaint Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–09754. United States of America and State of The United States of America, acting Commenters may request an Texas v. United Regional Health Care under the direction of the Attorney opportunity for a public meeting in the System, Civil Action No. 7:11–cv– General of the United States, and the affected area, in accordance with 00030–O. On February 25, 2011, the State of Texas, by and through the Texas Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. United States filed a Complaint alleging Attorney General, bring this civil 6973(d). that United Regional Health Care antitrust action to enjoin defendant The Non-Owned Site Settlement System has entered, maintained, and United Regional Health Care System Agreement may be examined at the enforced exclusionary contracts with (‘‘United Regional’’) from entering into, Office of the United States Attorney, 86 commercial insurers that effectively maintaining, or enforcing contracts with Chambers Street, 3rd Floor, New York, prevent those insurers from contracting commercial health insurers that New York 10007, and at the U.S. with United Regional’s competitors in effectively prevent those insurers from Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel violation of Section 2 of the Sherman contracting with United Regional’s Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Act, 15 U.S.C. 2. The proposed Final competitors, in violation of Section 2 of Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Judgment, filed at the same time as the the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2, and to remedy the effects of its unlawful During the public comment period, the Complaint, prohibits United Regional conduct. Plaintiffs allege as follows: Non-Owned Site Settlement Agreement from using agreements with commercial may also be examined on the following health insurers that improperly inhibit I. Nature of the Action Department of Justice Web site, http:// insurers from contracting with United 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Progress Report
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) thank the Advisory Group members for their advice and support during the US Auto Project. The Auto Companies and AAMA also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), US EPA Region V, and the Council of Great Lakes Governors (CGLG). PRINTING SPECIFICATIONS: Cover: 80 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Paper: 24 lb. 100 percent recycled, 100 percent post-consumer, non-coated, chlorine free Ink: Soy-based Reproduced by Michigan Great Printers Project participant CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For hard copies of the US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Final Progress Report, contact Chrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. Chrysler Ford Debby Rowe, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz Chrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive Parklane Towers East, Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 One Parklane Blvd. [email protected] Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Marcia Horan General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] INTERNET ACCESS: The US Auto Project Final Progress Report and pollution prevention industry case studies can be accessed at the MDEQ internet web site: http://www.deq.state.mi.us/ead/p2sect/auto/ US Auto Project Final Progress Report - November 1998 Page i Final Progress Report US Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary iv I.
    [Show full text]
  • OLDSMOBILE CLUB of AMERICA EASTERN MA. GMO CHAPTER Issue #34 Ma M May 2008 ROCKET POWER NEWSLETTER!!
    OLDSMOBILE CLUB OF AMERICA EASTERN MA. GMO CHAPTER Issue #34 Ma M May 2008 ROCKET POWER NEWSLETTER!! GMO 20TH Anniversary A Perspective on Oldsmobile Spring Dust-Off on May 4, 2008 By Karl Sup Oldsmobile Club of Arizona Is your Oldsmobile out of winter storage yet? If not, you better get cracking - the GMO Spring Wind is an amazing event. It comes from a Dust Off show will be held May 4, 2007 at distance as a faint whisper, approaches unseen Haskins Auto Sales in Wellesley under the through the trees until it envelopes you with its Oldsmobile sign (one of the few left standing) will, departing into the distance. And it only lasts whether you are ready or not. but a delicate moment. In it’s passing, there is a void. A void to us, like the last Oldsmobile rolling off the assembly line April 29th, 2004. We, the Oldsmobile Club of America, are left to write the epitaph and speak the eulogy of a great tradition, heritage and legacy; founded and forged with the heart and soul, the brains and brawn of innumerous inventors, engineers, marketers, office and assembly workers. Common folks. But uncommon to a man and woman. For what they have created in Oldsmobile has been masterful. And for that we are very grateful. We perused the online editions of the Lansing State Journal for historical facts. Typing 'OLDSMOBILE' into their website search engine returns a thousand results. Far less than ten percent of these results were articles, with the remainder being over 800 obituary entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 I Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project
    A VOLUNTARY POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP ADMINISTERED BY: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Division DECEMBER, 2000: 1st ISSUE John Engler, Governor • Russell J. Harding, Director www.deq.state.mi.us ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) thank the Auto Project Stakeholder Group members for providing advice to the Auto Project partners and facilitating public information exchange. The Auto Companies and MDEQ also acknowledge the guidance and counsel provided by the US EPA Region V. CONTACTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For information regarding the Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project Progress Report, contact DaimlerChrysler, Ford, or General Motors at the addresses listed below or the Environmental Assistance Division of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality at 1-800-662-9278. DaimlerChrysler Ford Doug Orf, CIMS 482-00-51 Sue Rokosz DaimlerChrysler Corporation Ford Motor Company 800 Chrysler Drive One Parklane Blvd., Suite 1400 Auburn Hills, MI 48326-2757 Dearborn, MI 48126 [email protected] [email protected] General Motors MDEQ Sandra Brewer, 482-303-300 Anita Singh Welch General Motors Corporation Environmental Assistance Division 465 W. Milwaukee Ave. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Detroit, MI 48202 P.O. Box 30457 [email protected] Lansing, MI 48909 [email protected] Michigan Auto Project Progress Report - December 2000 i Inaugural Progress Report Michigan Automotive Pollution Prevention Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreward iv I. Executive Summary Project Overview 1 Activities and Accomplishments 4 Focus on Michigan 11 Auto Company Profiles II. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Project Status 12 Activities and Accomplishments 14 Focus on Michigan 16 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Opel GT: Opel Goes Roadster
    January 2007 Opel GT: Opel Goes Roadster • Classic proportions: sleek silhouette, long hood, short overhangs • Archetypal roadster architecture with front-mounted engine and rear-wheel drive • High-tech turbo direct injection and twin A-arms • Roadster fun and performance at affordable price: 264 hp for 30,675 euros Rüsselsheim. The modern definition of an athletic two-seater finds its form in the new Opel GT. As a classic roadster, it has a powerful front-mounted engine, rear-wheel drive, a cockpit with sporty instruments and a tailor-made fabric roof. With a wide stance, sleek silhouette, long, front-hinged hood and short overhangs, the proportions are typical of this class. The Opel GT also brings new charm to this genre with its own unmistakable personality thanks to its exciting shape, which contrasts sharp edges with curved surfaces to create a dynamic look, and its configuration, which enables a refined driving experience, even on long journeys. The GT’ s pricing is also attractive. For 30,675 euros (recommended retail price in Germany incl. VAT), customers get no less than 264 hp from the high-tech turbo engine with gasoline direct injection. Acceleration from zero to 100 km/h takes less than six seconds. The new two-seater carries its legendary name because it continues the tradition of the first Opel GT (1968 – 1973) and, like the original, competes in one of the most exciting vehicle classes. The new Opel GT also showcases the brand’ s passion for dynamic cars, and the conviction that “ Opel was never as young as today” . This is underlined by niche models with a high fun factor, such as the Astra GTC with panorama windshield, the Tigra TwinTop Information concerning specifications and equipment applies to the models offered in iermany.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilmington Crusader New School Contract Is Signed
    Wllmingt on. Public library — —.-*-—? - •- No. Wilmington, Mass* The Wilmington Crusader VOL. if NO. » WILMINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS — WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 19S3 PRICE TEN CENTS New School Contract Is Signed Last night, at 10:03 p.m. in the Roman House, the Elemen- LITTLE LEAGUE MOTHERS «»T » MRS. DREW HOLDS A SELECTMEN'S MEETING tary School Building Commit- TO MEET TONIGHT EEN 1 ALK tee and the Poorvu Construc- tion Company of Boston, signed A meeting, this evening, at by K.y a contract for the construction 8:15, has been called by the Mothers of the Little League, at Dorothy Murray was married of the new school, on Wildwood Sunday afternoon to David Brag- Street. the Wilmington Skating Club- house, on Chestnut Street. The don. Dodo, was dressed in a The contract was for the com- meeting is for the purpose of white dress and matching hat plete construction of the school, organizing an association of the and wore a lovely orchid cor other than equipment, and the mothers, to help out with Little Isage. We wish Dodo and Dave cost stipulated was $498,439. The the best of luck in the years to school will be built according to League. come. - the plans and specifications ori- BRUSH FIRE NEAR Vacationing in Maine is Janet ginally bid on, with a few minor WILDCAT RAILROAD McKay, while Gert Fenlon and exceptions. All three of the com- Nancy Cain are in New Hamp- mittee members, E. Hayward The Fire Department was shire. Also Irene Wicks, and Bliss, Nicholas De Felice and Al- called out, Monday afternoon, Mary Lou Swain are having a an Shepherd signed the contract to combat a blaze which covered combined work-a-well and vaca- for the town of Wilmington, and about an acre of land, in back I tion-a-while summer in Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • State Detail Analysis
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-01-011 Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB2001-106315 Agency (5305W) June 2001 STATE DETAIL ANALYSIS THE NATIONAL BIENNIAL RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT (BASED ON 1999 DATA) Printed on paper that contains at least 50 percent postconsumer fiber. This page intentionally left blank. National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data CONTENTS EXECUTIVE . .SUMMARY . .ES . -1. ALABAMA . 1. ALASKA . 9. ARIZONA . .17 . ARKANSAS . .25 . CALIFORNIA . .33 . COLORADO . .41 . CONNECTICUT . .49 . DELAWARE . .57 . DISTRICT . .OF . .COLUMBIA . .65 . FLORIDA . .73 . GEORGIA . .81 . GUAM . .89 . HAWAII . .97 . IDAHO . .105 . ILLINOIS . .113 . INDIANA . .121 . IOWA . .129 . KANSAS . .137 . KENTUCKY . .145 . LOUISIANA . .153 . MAINE . .161 . MARYLAND . .169 . MASSACHUSETTS . .177 . MICHIGAN . .185 . MINNESOTA . .193 . MISSISSIPPI . .201 . MISSOURI . .209 . MONTANA . .217 . NAVAJO . .NATION . .225 . NEBRASKA . .233 . i National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data NEVADA . .241 . NEW . .HAMPSHIRE . .249 . NEW . .JERSEY . .257 . NEW . .MEXICO . .265 . NEW . .YORK . .273 . NORTH . .CAROLINA . .281 . NORTH . .DAKOTA . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Partial Conversion Support Materials
    City of East Lansing Bailey Community Center Protecting Michigan’s Future Bond Fund Grant #BF89-373 Request for Partial Conversion Support Materials Introduction In 1990, the City of East Lansing entered into an agreement with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to accept a Protecting Michigan’s Future Bond Fund Grant in the amount of $69,000 to replace existing windows on the Bailey Community Center (Grant #BF89-373)1. The Community Center had been constructed in 1922 as an East Lansing Public School and had been used for that purpose until the 1980’s, at which time it became a City of East Lansing public facility. The building has been used as a Community Center since then. The Bailey Community Center is located at 300 Bailey Street, East Lansing, MI. The Community Center and surrounding parking lots comprise the southern 1/3 of Bailey Park. The Park is 3.77 acres, with 1.58 acres being dedicated to the Community Center and parking lots2. The entire Park was encumbered in the Bond Fund Project Agreement. Concerns with the physical condition of the Community Center and the cost to continue operation of a Childcare Facility in this location prompted the City of East Lansing to pursue a Building Assessment in late 2014. The purpose of the assessment was to gain a comprehensive understanding of the existing condition of the Center and the actions needed to allow continuation of the current Center uses. The main body of the report can be found in Attachment C. The Building Assessment identified a wide range of building needs and deficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM TO: the Honorable Shawn M. Garvin Cabinet
    MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Shawn M. Garvin Cabinet Secretary, Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Control FROM: Lisa A. Vest Regulatory Specialist, Office of the Secretary Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control RE: Proposed Plan of Remedial Action for the General Motors Wilmington Assembly Plant Operable Unit 4 DATE: May 11, 2020 I. Background: A virtual public hearing was held on Thursday, April 9, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. via the State of Delaware Cisco WebEx Meeting Platform by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (“DNREC,” “Department”) to receive comment on the Department’s Proposed Plan of Remedial Action for the General Motors Wilmington Assembly Plant - Operable Unit 4 (“Proposed Plan”). This Proposed Plan is issued pursuant to the statutory authority granted to the Department in 7 Del.C. Chapter 91, the Delaware Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act (“HSCA”). Specifically, 7 Del.C. §9107(e)(1), Remedies, directs that the Department shall “… before conducting a remedial action, propose a plan of remedial action based on any investigation or study conducted by or for the Secretary, the potentially responsible party, or others.” This Proposed Plan summarizes the clean-up (remedial) actions that the Department is proposing to address contamination found at the General Motors Wilmington Assembly Plant (“Site”), specifically, at Operable Unit 4 (“OU-4”). The Site is located at 801 Boxwood Road in Wilmington, Delaware, and consists of five tax parcels (07-042.10-055, 07-042.10-143, 07-042.10-144, 07-038.40-052 and 07-042.20- 010), totaling approximately 141 acres. The nearest intersection to the Site is Boxwood Road and Centerville Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Motor Vehicle Industry
    The U.S. Motor Vehicle Industry: Confronting a New Dynamic in the Global Economy Bill Canis Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business Brent D. Yacobucci Specialist in Energy and Environmental Policy March 26, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41154 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The U.S. Motor Vehicle Industry: Confronting a New Dynamic in the Global Economy Summary This report provides an in-depth analysis of the 2009 crisis in the U.S. auto industry and its prospects for regaining domestic and global competitiveness. It also analyzes business and policy issues arising from the unprecedented restructurings that occurred within the industry. The starting point for this analysis is June-July 2009, with General Motors Company (GM or new GM) and Chrysler Group LLC (or new Chrysler) incorporated as new companies, having selectively acquired many, but not all, assets from their predecessor companies. The year 2009 was marked by recession and a crisis in global credit markets; the bankruptcy of General Motors Corporation and Chrysler LLC; the incorporation of successor companies under the auspices of the U.S. Treasury; hundreds of parts supplier bankruptcies; plant closings and worker buyouts; the cash-for-clunkers program; and increasing production and sales at year’s end. This report also examines the relative successes of the Ford Motor Company and the increasing presence of foreign-owned original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), foreign-owned parts manufacturers, competition from imported vehicles, and a serious buildup of global overcapacity that potentially threatens the recovery of the major U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Plan of Remedial Action
    Exhibit 12 GM-OU-4 Public Hearing April 9, 2020 PROPOSED PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION General Motors Corp. Wilmington Assembly Plant OU-4 Wilmington, Delaware DNREC Project No. DE-1149 March 2020 Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Waste and Hazardous Substances Remediation Section 391 Lukens Drive New Castle, Delaware 19720 CONTENTS • Figures: 1, 2 & 3 • Glossary of Terms PROPOSED PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION General Motors Corp. Wilmington Assembly Plant OU- 4 Wilmington, Delaware DNREC Project No. DE-1149 Approval: This Proposed Plan meets the requirements of the Hazardous Substance Cleanup Act. Approved by: ;. azi Salahuddin, Environmental Program Administrator Remediation Section Datd 2 PROPOSED PLAN Questions & Answers General Motors Corp. Wilmington Assembly Plant OU-4 What is the Proposed Plan of Remedial Action? The Proposed Plan of Remedial Action (Proposed Plan) summarizes the clean-up (remedial) actions that are being proposed to address contamination found at the Site for public comment. A legal notice is published in the newspaper for a 20-day comment period. DNREC considers and addresses all public comments received and publishes a Final Plan of Remedial Action (Final Plan) for the Site. What is the GM Site OU-4? The General Motors Corp. Wilmington Assembly Plant is located at 801 Boxwood Road in Wilmington, Delaware, and is approximately 141 acres in size (Figure 1). The Site originally consisted oftwo New Castle County tax parcels: 07-042.10-055 and 07-042.20-010. In March 2019, a new subdivision plan was approved that reduced the size of original tax parcel number 07-042.10-055 and created three new tax parcels (07-042.10-143, 07-042.10-144 and 07-038.40- 052) out of the remainder of07-042.10-055.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X in Re : : Chapter 11 Case No
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------x In re : : Chapter 11 Case No. MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., : f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al. : 09-50026 (REG) : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : ------------------------------------------------------------------x AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I, Laurie M. Thornton, being duly sworn, depose and state: 1. I am a Senior Bankruptcy Consultant with The Garden City Group, Inc., the claims and noticing agent for the debtors and debtors-in-possession (the “Debtors”) in the above-captioned proceeding. Our business address is 815 Western Avenue, Suite 200, Seattle, Washington 98104. 2. On December 22, 2009, at the direction of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel for the Debtors, I caused a true and correct copy of the following documents (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to be served by first class mail on the parties identified on Exhibit B annexed hereto (neighbors within .5 miles of the designated sites, the Office of the United States Trustee, the United States Attorney’s Office, and counsel for the Committee of Unsecured Creditors): • Proof of Claim; and • Notice of Deadline for Filing Certain Proofs of Claim. Dated: December 23, 2009. /s/ Laurie M. Thornton__________________ Seattle, Washington LAURIE M. THORNTON Sworn to before me in Seattle, Washington this 23rd day of December, 2009. /s/ Brook Lyn Bower______________ BROOK LYN BOWER Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing in Seattle My Commission Expires: July 26, 2012 License No. 99205 EXHIBIT A *P-APS$F-POC* UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PROOF OF CLAIM Name of Debtor (Check Only One): Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxwood Logistics Campus I-95
    BOXWOOD LOGISTICS CAMPUS I-95 THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE BOXWOOD SITE April 17, 2018 REPORT SUBMITTED TO: Harvey Hanna & Associates, Inc. 405 East Marsh Lane, Suite 1 Newport, DE 19804 REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Econsult Solutions 1435 Walnut Street, 4th floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 Econsult Solutions, Inc.| 1435 Walnut Street, 4th floor| Philadelphia, PA 19102 | 215-717-2777 | econsultsolutions.com i Harvey Hanna & Associates | Economic Impact of the Boxwood Road Site| Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 About the Proposed Redevelopment ...................................................................... 1 1.3 How Major Redevelopment Projects are Impactful on Regional Economies .... 2 1.4 Overview of Report Structure ..................................................................................... 3 2.0 Existing Conditions of the Site .............................................................................................. 4 2.1 History of the General
    [Show full text]