Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Part 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR AND MAIDENHEAD PART 6 - TERMS OF REFERENCE OF ALL OTHER COMMITTEES, PANELS AND OTHER BODIES OF THE COUNCIL F4 Area Forums F4.1 Purpose The Royal Borough has established two Area Forums: .Windsor Town Forum covering issues concerning the following wards: Castle Without Clewer East Clewer North Clewer South Eton and Castle Eton Wick Park .Maidenhead Town Forum, covering issues concerning the following wards: Belmont Boyn Hill Furze Platt Maidenhead Riverside Oldfield Pinkneys Green These Area Forums will provide a means whereby the Council can consult with local communities and, potentially, devolve some decision-making. The Area Forums are given the power to spend money as delegated by Cabinet resolution; to direct neighbourhood budget expenditure in unparished areas and to send reports with recommendations to Cabinet. The Area Forums will report any such expenditure to Cabinet at least annually. In order to facilitate these roles, Area Forums will be able to work with the local residents, businesses, organisations, including public and private sector, and with other representative organisations such as Parish Councils, Chambers of Commerce, Residents’ Associations, etc., any of whom may be invited to attend and contribute to the discussions of the Area Forum. The Area Forums will be politically balanced wherever possible and the Members should represent a Ward within the areas of responsibility set out above. The Area Forums may consider areas such as: Local Policing Local planning consultation Local youth services Local transport issues, including car parking Repair and maintenance of local highways Local library and information services Local leisure, heritage and arts Local environmental initiatives F4.2 Membership Windsor Town Forum - 7 Members; Maidenhead Town Forum - 7 Members F4.3 Quorum: 2 Members F4.4 Frequency: Three times per annum. http://rbwm.moderngov.co.uk/ieDocHome.aspx?Categories=.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

PER WG 260601.Doc AGENDA
N O T I C E O F M E E T I N G PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP will meet on TUESDAY 26 JUNE 2001 At 8.00 pm in MEETING ROOM 'A', TOWN HALL, ST. IVES ROAD, MAIDENHEAD TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP (For action) COUNCILLORS LAWRENCE (CHAIRMAN), MRS BATESON (VICE-CHAIRMAN), BURBAGE, MRS ENDACOTT, MRS GLIKSTEN, MRS KEMP, OLNEY, MRS QUICK, WERNER AND WILES. c.c. Chief Executive, Borough Secretary, Andrew Scott, Rob Curtis and Sue Goddard. Barry Morfett Head of Corporate Administration Issued: Tuesday 26th June 2001 BJM/ag mins reps/PER WG 260601.doc AGENDA PART I ITEM SUBJECT WARD PAGE NO 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. 2. AREAS FOR RECONSIDERATION To look further at certain areas as requested by Members at the last meeting viz:- Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Cookham/Bisham Cox Green/Woodlands Park and Hurley Windsor Urban Area Maidenhead Urban Area NB. The proposals submitted by the Liberal Democrat Group have been summarised in the above report. Details of their proposals have been attched as an Appendix. BJM/ag mins reps/PER WG 260601.doc 2. AREAS FOR RECONSIDERATION At the Working Group meeting on 21 June, it was agreed that further consideration should be given to detailed options provided by Members of the Working Group in relation to the following areas:- Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Cookham and Bisham Cox Green, Woodlands Park and Hurley Windsor Urban Area Maidenhead Urban Area Members will recall that at the meeting on 21 June, the officers provided proposals for each of the areas in question and the following report provides details not only of the proposals originally but also the options supplied by individual Members.
[Show full text]
Kiln Place, Malders Lane, Pinkneys Green, Berkshire SL6
Kiln Place, Malders Lane, Pinkneys Green, Berkshire SL6 6NJ KILN PLACE Situation: Surrounded by acres of National Trust land at Pinkneys Green, the property is just two miles distant from Maidenhead, providing excellent range of shopping, sporting and MALDERS LANE, PINKNEYS GREEN social facilities as well as railway station serving Paddington which will connect to Crossrail in BERKSHIRE SL6 6NJ 2019. The property is within excellent school catchment and the M4 & M40 motorways are accessible via the Marlow by-pass at Maidenhead Thicket or Bisham. PRICE: £1,695,000 FREEHOLD Directions: From Maidenhead, proceed north along the Marlow Road (A308), along Craufurd Rise into Gringer Hill. Proceed past St Pyrons School on the right , continue into Furze Platt Occupying a quiet cul-de-sac location in this Road and proceed past Furze Platt Secondary School on the left. On reaching Pinkneys Green, extremely sought-after semi-rural location on the proceed for a short distance, turning right into Winter Hill Road. After approx. a quarter of a borders of Pinkneys Green/Cookham Dean and a mile, turn right into Malders Lane, proceed for a short distance, turning left into Kiln Place and short walk of acres of National Trust land. An the property will be seen at the end on the right. outstanding five bedroom detached family home built, we believe, by Berkeley Homes in 1990, featuring well-proportioned and spacious accommodation offered in excellent decorative order set in delightful secluded gardens of approx. one third of an acre. In addition, the property
[Show full text]
Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
[Show full text]
Windsor Neighbourhood Area and Forum Application
Tel: 01753 855106 14a Bolton Crescent Windsor Berkshire SL4 3JQ 15th May 2014 Planning Policy Manager Planning & Property Services Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead St Ives Road Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 1LF Dear Sir, Application for Windsor to be designated as a Neighbourhood Area and the Windsor Neighbourhood Plan Forum to be considered as the relevant body to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan Under the terms of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (“the Act”) Part 2& 3, we submit this application to the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) for a Neighbourhood Area designation and a Neighbourhood Forum. Name The name of the proposed neighbourhood forum will be the Windsor Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) Forum. Constitution A copy of the draft constitution of the proposed forum is attached. This document was submitted to those present at an inaugural meeting held on Thursday 8th May 2014, together with a request for comments which will be reviewed at our next scheduled meeting in June. Map The name of the neighbourhood area to which the application relates is Windsor and a map which identifies the area is attached as [1 of 2]. The application relates to the unparished wards of Castle Without, Clewer East, Clewer North & Clewer South (excluding parished areas covered by Bray Parish), Eton and Castle (excluding the parished area covered by Eton Town Council) and Park but excluding an area which is the subject of a separate application which will be submitted by the Central Windsor Neighbourhood Plan (CWNP) for Business group. A second map [2 of 2] is enclosed which shows the proposed separate Business Area submission.
[Show full text]
Eton Community Association
Dear Sir/Madam, At a recent meeting of representatives from Eton Community Association, we talked about commenting on the proposed Ward Boundaries as they affect Eton Town Council, which includes the current wards of Eton and Castle, and Eton Wick. Option D is of significant concern. This is not aligned with the Eton Community nor indeed the Eton & Eton Wick Neighbourhood Plan, which is currently out for consultation with the submission version (Regulation 16). We are aware that the Eton & Eton Wick Town Council is opposed to option D too. These are reasons that give cause for concern: 1 The proposal seems to be based on only one of the 3 criteria to be considered, namely numbers of voters. The criteria of relevance to the community seens to have been disregarded. 2 Eton with Eton Wick is a self-contained community with absolutely no relationship with Datchet and Horton. 3 The community has just completed a Neighbourhood Plan for Eton and Eton Wick combined, and a huge amount of time, hard work and money will go to waste by attaching two new whole communities to it. Having attended the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan local consultations, my colleagues and I have good knowledge of various NPs, including Windsor 2030, Outer Windsor, Horton & Wraysbury. It is clear that our alignment with and inter-relationship with Windsor is strong. We have no such relationship with Wraysbury or Datchet. 4 Our two existing Ward Councillors have worked tirelessly for Eton and Eton Wick, each being responsible for one of the Wards. This system has served the community well and to change into a multi-dimensional system with several councillors looking after a conglomerate of diverse communities gives cause for concern.
[Show full text]
Windsor & Maidenhead 1997-2011
Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Election Results 1997-2011 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
[Show full text]
A Market Position Statement
Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead A Market Position Statement 1 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 3 2. Key Themes from the Market Position Statement ......................................................................... 4 The Council’s vision for Adult Social Care .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 National context for Adult Social Care ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 What is a Market Position Statement and why have one? ............................................................................................... 6 3.3 Who is this document intended for? ......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Population
[Show full text]
Plan Your Journey
Stop Time Location Route 11 Flackwell Heath – BCA Minibus 70 07:50 Flackwell Heath – Rugwood Road Bus stop 71 07:58 Flackwell Heath – Blind Lane Northern woods Green Dragon pub 72 08:05 Bourne End – Hedsor Road Walnut Tree pub PLAN YOUR 73 08:12 Cookham – Sutton Road just passed school lane opposite Black Butts cottages 74 08:15 Maidenhead – Sheephouse Road Bus stop opposite Maidenhead Court Park 75 08:21 Maidenhead – A4 Bridge Road Bus Stop opposite Texaco Garage JOURNEY Route 12 Holyport – BCA Minibus 76 08:00 Holyport – Stroud Farm Road corner shop 77 08:02 Holyport – Holyport Road by Springfield Park junction 78 08:10 Braywick – Top of Walker Road 79 08:15 Frascati Way – Bus stop 80 08:18 Gringer Hill – Craufaud Rise bus stop by railway bridge 81 08:22 Cranbrook Drive – Opposite Brompton Drive 82 08:24 Cranbrook Drive – Opposite Cherington Gate 83 08:27 Pinkneys Green – Corner of Pinkneys Road opposite the cricket club Route 13 Twyford – BCA Minibus 84 08:00 Twyford – Outside Waitrose London Road 85 08:10 Waltham st Lawrence – Star pub Broadmoor Lane 86 08:13 White Wathham – Beehive Pub 87 08:17 Woodlands Park – Bus stop outside Methodist Church 88 08:25 Norreys Drive – Bus stop 89 08:30 Bath Road A4 – Opposite Highway garage Daily services from many local towns Please note we use external coach Amersham, Aylesbury, Beaconsfield, companies for some of the routes, the Bracknell, Camberley, Great Missenden, name of the provider is shown for each Henley, High Wycombe, Hounslow, route. Please refer to www.bca.ac.uk for Maidenhead, Reading, Slough, Staines, the student transport code of conduct.
[Show full text]
Particulars Latest Particulars 020518.Pub
MAIDENHEAD 22 Queen Street, Berks SL6 1HZ Tel: 01628 621177 [email protected] RURAL DEPARTMENT The Old Dairy, Hyde Farm COOKHAM Marlow Road Thistle Cottage, Berks, SL6 9EH Pinkneys Green Tel: 01628 532010 Berks [email protected] Tel: 01628 777666 [email protected] MARLOW-ON-THAMES 65 High Street, Bucks, SL7 1BA Tel: 01628 477555 [email protected] FOR SALE 24.423 ACRES OF ARABLE LAND TWYFORD ROAD, WALTHAM ST. LAWRENCE, RG10 0HE GUIDE PRICE: £475,000 WWW.PSKRURAL.CO.UK Note: These sales particulars are produced in good faith, having been prepared only as a general guide. PSK give notice that they do not constitute any part of a contract. We have not carried out a detailed survey, nor tested the services, appliances and specific fittings if any. 24.423 ACRES OF ARABLE LAND TWYFORD ROAD, WALTHAM ST. LAWRENCE, RG10 0HE Introduction Plans, Areas and Schedules A level arable field extending to 24.423 acres with double Plans attached to the particulars are based upon the gated access off Mire Lane, off the Twyford Road. Ordnance Survey National Grid and are for reference only. The purchasers will be deemed to have satisfied themselves Situated approximately half a mile to the south west of of the land as scheduled. All quoted areas, measurements Waltham St Lawrence in East Berkshire. and distances are approximate. The land has historically been used for arable crop and has Boundaries currently been left fallow. The vendors and the vendor’s agent will do their best to specify the ownership of the boundary hedges, fences and The property benefits from planning permission for an ditches but will not be bound to determine these.
[Show full text]
The Vicar's Letter
The Vicar’s Letter The Vicarage, Waltham Road, (corner of Foliejohn Way) Woodlands Park Telephone 01628 822000 Dear Friends, When I was little, I could never understand the attitude of grown-ups to snow. Snow was fun. Snow was enjoyable. Snow gave you the opportunity to make snowmen, have snowball fights, or go tobogganing. And we didn’t get nearly enough of it. So when it snowed it was exciting. It was something to be welcomed with joy. But grown-ups didn’t seem to think so. They complained about it. They hoped it wouldn’t snow, and grumbled when it did. They thought it was a nuisance. Now I’ve grown up myself I can see both sides. I understand why many of us really don’t like the snow (however much we may say we want a ‘white Christmas’). I know the frustrations when bad weather means that we can’t do what we had planned to do, or when others can’t do what we were relying on them to do. And there are obvious problems for those whose jobs involve trying to get about or working outside, or who have a long commute. But if I’m honest, then I still side with the children. These last few weeks we have seen more snow than I think I have ever experienced before — certainly in my adult life. By the time you read this that may be just a memory, or we may have had yet more. But every time it’s happened, or been promised, then (whatever difficulties it has caused to my own plans) deep down I have had that frisson of excitement that I used to get as a child.
[Show full text]
The Windsor and Maidenhead (Electoral Changes) Order 2018
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2018 No. 1272 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Windsor and Maidenhead (Electoral Changes) Order 2018 Made - - - - 30th November 2018 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) and (3) Under section 58(4) of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009( a) (“the Act”) the Local Government Boundary Commission for England( b) (“the Commission”) published a report dated July 2018 stating its recommendations for changes to the electoral arrangements for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Commission has decided to give effect to the recommendations. A draft of the instrument has been laid before Parliament and a period of forty days has expired since the day on which it was laid and neither House has resolved that the instrument be not made. The Commission makes the following Order in exercise of the power conferred by section 59(1) of the Act. Citation and commencement 1. —(1) This Order may be cited as the Windsor and Maidenhead (Electoral Changes) Order 2018. (2) This article and article 2 come into force on the day after the day on which this Order is made. (3) Articles 3 and 4 come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to the election of councillors, on the day after the day on which this Order is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors( c) in 2019. Interpretation 2. —(1) In this Order, “the map” means the map marked “Map referred to in the Windsor and Maidenhead (Electoral Changes) Order 2018”, held by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England( d).
[Show full text]
Minutes Template
COUNCIL - 02.03.21 AT AN EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL held as a Virtual Meeting on Tuesday, 2nd March, 2021 PRESENT: The Mayor (Councillor John Story), The Deputy Mayor (Councillor Gary Muir) Councillors John Baldwin, Clive Baskerville, Christine Bateson, Gurpreet Bhangra, Simon Bond, John Bowden, Mandy Brar, Catherine Del Campo, David Cannon, Stuart Carroll, Gerry Clark, David Coppinger, Carole Da Costa, Wisdom Da Costa, Jon Davey, Karen Davies, Phil Haseler, Geoff Hill, David Hilton, Maureen Hunt, Andrew Johnson, Greg Jones, Lynne Jones, Neil Knowles, Ewan Larcombe, Sayonara Luxton, Ross McWilliams, Helen Price, Samantha Rayner, Joshua Reynolds, Julian Sharpe, Shamsul Shelim, Gurch Singh, Donna Stimson, Chris Targowski, Helen Taylor, Amy Tisi, Leo Walters and Simon Werner Officers: David Cook, Emma Duncan, Suzanne Martin, Kevin McDaniel, Barbara Richardson, Duncan Sharkey, Adele Taylor, Karen Shepherd and Adrien Waite 84. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE None received 85. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillor Rayner declared a personal interest in the item ‘Petition for Debate – Maidenhead Golf Course/Great Park’ as several of the sites listed in Appendix 2 were owned by her family. She would not participate in the debate or vote on the item. Councillor Price declared an interest in the item ‘Petition for Debate – Maidenhead Golf Course/Great Park’ as she was a member of the golf club. The Monitoring Officer confirmed that as Councillor Price’s interest was a potentially prejudicial interest, she had granted Councillor Price a dispensation to enable her to speak on the item as a local member to facilitate the debate. 86. PUBLIC QUESTIONS a) Alison Carpenter of Eton and Castle ward asked the following question of Councillor Hilton, Lead Member for Finance and Ascot: I am concerned that the tone of the funding section of the leaflet is unreasonably focussing on potential costs to residents rather than the potential benefits.
[Show full text]