DOCSLIB.ORG

Action Oak Knowledge Review 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Action Oak Knowledge Review 2019 Action Oak Knowledge Review An assessment of the current evidence on oak health, identification of evidence gaps and prioritisation of research needs May 2019 Christopher Quine, Nick Atkinson, Sandra Denman, Marie- Laure Desprez-Loustau, Robert Jackson, Keith Kirby Acknowledgements The Panel would like to thank all those involved in drawing together knowledge for this review against a very tight timetable – contributors are listed on the following page and at the start of each chapter. Claire Holmes provided comprehensive support. We are also grateful to Defra for financial support, for reviewers who provided comments which honed the content, and to the many stakeholders who provided insights and knowledge along the way. Please cite this publication as - Quine, C.P., Atkinson, N., Denman, S., Desprez-Loustau, M-L., Jackson, R., Kirby, K. (eds) 2019. Action Oak Knowledge review: an assessment of the current evidence on oak health in the UK, identification of evidence gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Action Oak, Haslemere, UK. ISBN 978-1-5272-4193-0 Version number: 1.2 Date: May 2019 ii Contributors Editorial Panel Nick Atkinson Marie-Laure Desprez-Loustau Keith Kirby Woodland Trust INRA, Bordeaux Oxford University Sandra Denman Robert Jackson Chris Quine Forest Research University of Reading Forest Research Authors Bianca Ambrose-Oji Peter Crow James McDonald Forest Research Forest Research Bangor University Frank Ashwood Ben Ditchburn Ruth Mitchell Forest Research Forest Research James Hutton Institute Nadia Barsoum David Edwards Jake Morris Forest Research Forest Research Defra Sue Benham Alison Dyke Liz O’Brien Forest Research SEI, York University Forest Research Martin Bidartondo Hilary Geoghegan Richard O’Hanlon Imperial College London Reading University Agri-Food & Biosciences Inst. Mike Birkett Robin Gill Ana Perez-Sierra Rothamsted Research Forest Research Forest Research Emma Bonham Clare Hall Suzanne Perry Harper Adams University Forest Research Natural England Samantha Broadmedow Jeanette Hall Michael Petr Forest Research Scottish Natural Heritage Forest Research Alice Broome Daegan Inward Katy Reed Forest Research Forest Research Forest Research Nathan Brown Mike Jeger Laura Suz Rothamsted Research Imperial College, London Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Paul Brown Anparasy Kajamuhan Julie Urquhart Fera Forest Research Gloucester University Joan Cottrell Gary Kerr Elena Vanguelova Forest Research Forest Research Forest Research Rob Coventry Mariella Marzano Jozsef Vuts Forest Research Forest Research Rothamsted Research Bridget Crampton Bangor University iii Executive Summary Oak is a much-loved and essential component of British landscapes in settings from woodlands to urban parks. There are concerns over its health and prospects for the future given a growing range of threats. A knowledge review was commissioned to identify what is known and not known about oak health. In particular, the evidence relating to the two native oak species in the British landscape, Quercus robur and Q. petraea, the functions performed and threats faced, and the interactions with a range of social, economic and environmental factors. The aim is to provide a framework to prioritise future research on these native oak species in the UK. Teams of authors, 41 in all from institutes in Britain and abroad, reviewed relevant published literature and consulted with stakeholders to ascertain the state of expert knowledge. Findings are summarised in ten main chapters which focus on a particular topic (e.g. pests; diseases; monitoring), provide relevant sources and references, and identifiy specific gaps in the knowledge. A panel of six senior scientists reviewed the findings, reflected on the broader knowledge requirements and incorporated them into a broad conceptual framework. Six grand challenges emerged from the synthesis of the topics that provide a focus for future research, integrating the contribution of many disciplines. These are -: 1. Securing long-term commitment - Tackle the dearth of long-term records through a renewed commitment to existing monitoring, trials and sustained commitment to exploration of new methods. 2. Understanding oak demography and its dynamics - Tackle the lack of understanding of demography, especially in non-woodland settings. 3. Uncovering the functioning of tree systems - Tackle the lack of holistic studies of oak health (and that of other tree species) 4. Profiling the threats - Tackle uncertainty over the magnitude of the future health problem from pests and diseases, those already in Britain and those yet to arrive, to understand the single and compound nature of threats. 5. Fostering management and engagement - Tackle the lack of management of (oak) woodlands and lack of engagement of owners and publics in tree health. 6. Establishing the nature of interactions and complexity - Tackle the inherently complex and uncertain nature of the health problems associated with oak. iv Contents Page Acknowledgements ii Contributors iii Executive summary iv Chapter 1 Oak Health Knowledge Review 1 Introduction and Synthesis 2 Environmental factors stressing oak trees 17 2.1 Oak health and functional diversity of mycorrhizas 25 3 Pest threats to UK oak health 39 4 Pathogen threats to native oaks in the UK 65 5 Oak health and biodiversity 95 6 Fundamental knowledge of genetics and implications for health of oak trees 117 7 Monitoring oak health 141 8 Land managers and publics: knowledge, attitudes and actions associated 159 with threats to oak trees 9 Management of oak tree health 175 10 Semiochemical-based strategies 189 Figures 1.1 Oak health conceptual framework. 6 2.1 Distribution of published relevant research in the UK across the main 30 environmental factors, expressed as percentage of total number of publications consulted in this review. 2.2 Distribution of published relevant studies in the UK across main research and 30 experimental approaches, expressed as percentage of total number of publications consulted in this review. 2.3 Number of publications (hits) on Web of Science using different search terms 31 for oak declines. v 5.1 Impacts of biodiversity under five alternative oak futures produced under 104 current drivers of change for high forest oak ecosystems. 5.2 Impacts on biodiversity under five alternative oak futures produced under 105 current drivers of change for open oak ecosystems. 7.1 Distribution of historic (1987-2007) Forest Condition Survey (FCS) oak plots 151 and their status in 2018. 84 sites have been revisited and monitoring could continue at these sites. 9.1 Schematic stages of stand development following major disturbances. 180 Tables 1.1 Chapter structure of knowledge review. 7 1.2 Terminology relating to weight of evidence. 8 1.3 Glossary of terms. 8 1.4 Summary of prominence of oak in Britain 9 1.5 Main chapter specific knowledge gaps. 11 1.6 Interactions contributing to oak health. 13 1.7 Six grand challenges for oak health derived from the knowledge review. 14 2.1 Type and form of N deposition and associated risk areas. 31 2.2 Search terms used in database. 32 3.1 Native and established insect pests of oak trees in the UK. 50 3.2 Non-native insects posing a potential future risk to oak health in the UK. 55 4.1 Diagnosis of oak damage: Biotic causes – Disease: number of reports from 81 1972 – 2017 to Forest Research Tree Health Advisory Service. 4.2 Priority diseases currently causing significant or regular damage to oak and 82 potential future threats to oak trees in the UK. 5.1 Impacts on biodiversity under five alternative oak futures produced under 106 current drivers of change for high forest oak ecosystems. 5.2 Impacts on biodiversity under five alternative oak futures produced under 108 current drivers of change for open oak ecosystems. 6.1 The main oak provenance trial series located in Britain and elsewhere along 133 with details of the total number of provenances, number of British provenances, number of sites, site locations, traits assessed and main findings. 6.2 List of oak plus trees and their origin according to country and seed zone. 134 6.3 List of trial sites along with the number of half-sib families, number of plants 135 per family, total number of plants planted and number of plants remaining in 2007. 7.1 Summary of available survey information. 152 7.2 Summary of priority research areas currently being investigated for Action 153 Oak. 9.1 Summary of selected studies on subject of pesticides. 181 9.2 Assessment of weight of evidence for main conclusions in the review. 182 vi Action Oak - Knowledge Review 1. Oak Health Knowledge Review – Introduction and Synthesis Christopher Quine, Nick Atkinson, Sandra Denman, Marie-Laure Desprez- Loustau, Robert Jackson, Keith Kirby Introduction and scope of the Knowledge Review Context Oak (Quercus robur and Q. petraea) has a special place in the public consciousness, in British culture, and contributes to environmental stability, the woodland economy and biodiversity. It is the most common broadleaf tree species in Britain, supports more species and stores more carbon than any other native tree. In general oaks are regarded as robust and well adapted to a range of environmental conditions, but both these species are subject to a range of pests and diseases and are now facing many other pressures, such as increased air and soil pollutants, environmental pressures, and changing climate patterns with extreme weather events. Concern about the health of oaks has been heightened by people’s memories of Dutch elm disease, and by the recent arrival of ash dieback emphasising the risks of new introductions. This report confirms that the concern about oak health is justified and proposes what could be done to obtain the knowledge necessary to address these issues. The Action Oak public/private partnership is a new initiative to protect and improve the UK’s oak trees – acknowledging their iconic and important role and responding to concerns over multiple threats to their health. The knowledge review was commissioned by Defra on behalf of the partnership to establish a baseline against which new knowledge is gained and proposals for new research are assessed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Robur (Fagaceae)
    Quercus robur (Fagaceae) The map description EEBIO area The integrated map shows the distribution and changes in the areal’s boundaries of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur). Q. robur is the dominant forest- formative species in the belt of broadleaf and mixed 4 needleleaf-broadleaf forests in the plains of the European part of the former USSR (Sokolov et al. 1977). In the northern part of its areal Q. robur grows in river valleys. In the central part, it forms mixed forests with Picea abies; closer to the south – a belt of broadleaf forests where Q. robur dominates. At the areal’s south boundary it forms small (marginal) forests in ravines and flood-plains (Atlas of Areals and Resources… , 1976). Q. robur belongs to the thermophilic species. The low temperature bound of possible occurrence of oak forests is marked by an average annual of 2?C l (http://www.forest.ru – in Russian). Therefore, l l l l l l hypotretically, oak areal boundaries will shift along l ll l l l l l l l with the changes in the average annual temperature. l l l l l l l l l l l For Yearly map of averaged mean annual air l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l lll temperature (Afonin A., Lipiyaynen K., Tsepelev V., l l l l l l l ll ll l l l 2005) see http://www.agroatlas.spb.ru Climate. l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Oak forests are of great importance for the water l l l l l ll l lll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l regime and soil structure, especially on the steep l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l slopes of river valleys and in forest-poor areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Fagaceae Trees
    CHAPTER 5 5 Fagaceae Trees Antoine Kremerl, Manuela Casasoli2,Teresa ~arreneche~,Catherine Bod6n2s1, Paul Sisco4,Thomas ~ubisiak~,Marta Scalfi6, Stefano Leonardi6,Erica ~akker~,Joukje ~uiteveld', Jeanne ~omero-Seversong, Kathiravetpillai Arumuganathanlo, Jeremy ~eror~',Caroline scotti-~aintagne", Guy Roussell, Maria Evangelista Bertocchil, Christian kxerl2,Ilga porth13, Fred ~ebard'~,Catherine clark15, John carlson16, Christophe Plomionl, Hans-Peter Koelewijn8, and Fiorella villani17 UMR Biodiversiti Genes & Communautis, INRA, 69 Route d'Arcachon, 33612 Cestas, France, e-mail: [email protected] Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Universita "La Sapienza", Piazza A. Moro 5,00185 Rome, Italy Unite de Recherche sur les Especes Fruitikres et la Vigne, INRA, 71 Avenue Edouard Bourlaux, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France The American Chestnut Foundation, One Oak Plaza, Suite 308 Asheville, NC 28801, USA Southern Institute of Forest Genetics, USDA-Forest Service, 23332 Highway 67, Saucier, MS 39574-9344, USA Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Universitk di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 1lIA, 43100 Parma, Italy Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Alterra Wageningen UR, Centre for Ecosystem Studies, P.O. Box 47,6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA lo Flow Cytometry and Imaging Core Laboratory, Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, 1201 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101,
    [Show full text]
  • E Near East Forestry and Range Commission
    November 2017 FO:NEFRC/2017/9 E NEAR EAST FORESTRY AND RANGE COMMISSION TWENTY-THIRD SESSION Beirut, Lebanon, 11 - 14 December 2017 FOREST HEALTH IN THE NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION I. INTRODUCTION 1. Based on FRA 2015 data, NENA forest cover is significantly small, estimated at 42 million hectares (3.0 percent of region’s land area) while Other Wooded Land (OWL) is estimated at 35.4 million hectares. In total both forests and OWL represents 5.4 percent of the land area of the region. 2. The forests in the NENA region are used for timber, wood fuel and many other forest related uses: grazing, agriculture, and as a source of non-wood products which are an integral part of the livelihood of the rural population. In addition to the socio-economic functions, these forests provide ecosystem services such as watershed management, soil protection and combatting desertification. 3. The increasing number of forest pest outbreaks in the NENA region is threatening the health and vitality of the forest cover. There are a number of factors that lead to pest outbreaks; increased travel and trade together with climate change impacts trigger pest introduction, establishment and rapid colonization events (FAO, 2009). Although the direct effects of climate on the population dynamics of forest insect pests and other biotic disturbance agents remain poorly understood, the common implicated causal factor for widespread decline of many tree species in multiple forest types is considered to be elevated temperatures and/or water stress. 4. Forest decline diseases are complex and involve interacting factors (Ceisla, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella Species
    A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Printed in Eko-trykk A/S, Førde, Norway Printing date: 1. August 1995 ISBN 82-90724-14-4 ISSN 0802-4966 A Nomenclatural Study of Armillaria and Armillariella species (Basidiomycotina, Tricholomataceae) by Thomas J. Volk & Harold H. Burdsall, Jr. Synopsis Fungorum 8 Fungiflora - Oslo - Norway 6 Authors address: Center for Forest Mycology Research Forest Products Laboratory United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service One Gifford Pinchot Dr. Madison, WI 53705 USA ABSTRACT Once a taxonomic refugium for nearly any white-spored agaric with an annulus and attached gills, the concept of the genus Armillaria has been clarified with the neotypification of Armillaria mellea (Vahl:Fr.) Kummer and its acceptance as type species of Armillaria (Fr.:Fr.) Staude. Due to recognition of different type species over the years and an extremely variable generic concept, at least 274 species and varieties have been placed in Armillaria (or in Armillariella Karst., its obligate synonym). Only about forty species belong in the genus Armillaria sensu stricto, while the rest can be placed in forty-three other modem genera. This study is based on original descriptions in the literature, as well as studies of type specimens and generic and species concepts by other authors. This publication consists of an alphabetical listing of all epithets used in Armillaria or Armillariella, with their basionyms, currently accepted names, and other obligate and facultative synonyms.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene: Adaptation of Science, Policy, and Practices Forest Rocky Mountain Proceedings Service Research Station RMRS-P-71 July 2014 Sample, V. Alaric and Bixler, R. Patrick (eds.). 2014. Proceedings. RMRS-P-71. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Research Abstract - - - change. Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene: Adaptation of Science, Policy, and Practices Edited by: V. Alaric Sample, President, Pinchot Institute for Conservation, Washington, DC; and R. Patrick Bixler, Research Fellow, Pinchot Institute for Conservation, Washington, DC FOREWORD The future of America’s forests is more uncertain now than at any time since science-based sustainable forest management was established in this country more than a century ago. The Conservation Movement of the late 19th and early 20th century saw the creation of federally protected public forests, establishment of the basic laws and policies that guide the sustainable management of state, private, and tribal forests, and development of an unrivaled capacity for forest research and science. Our knowledge of forests has never been better, yet an area of forest larger than that of several states stands dead or dying, with millions more acres imperiled not by foreign invasive species, but by native insects and pathogens with which these forests have co- acknowledged as the best in the world. Yet millions of acres of public and private forests go up they are today. What is going on here? What has changed? Since the days of the Conservation Movement and Gifford Pinchot’s urgent call to action to protect America’s forests, our population has grown from 76 million people to 325 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Tortrix Viridana, L
    PLAGAS Y ENFERMEDADES DE LAS MASAS FORESTALES EXTREMEÑAS 6 Tortrix viridana, L. JUNTA DE EXTREMADURA Consejería de Industria, Energía y Medio ambiente DESCRIPCIÓN Orden: Lepidoptera; Familia: Tortricidae Especie defoliadora, ocasionalmente polífaga, si bien ataca principalmente a especies del género 1 Quercus, lo hace con especial relevancia a Quercus ilex y Quercus suber, aunque en Extremadura también se han observado daños relevantes en robledales de Quercus pyrenaica. El imago tiene una envergadura de entre 18 y 23 mm. El tórax, cabeza y alas anteriores son de color verde claro y las alas posteriores grisáceas con una línea blanco-amarillenta. Antenas filiformes y abdomen rechoncho con penachos de escamas en su extremo. No hay dimorfismo sexual. La puesta suele ser de unos 60 huevos que pone en varios grupos de dos o tres, recubiertos por escamas del abdomen y restos que se encuentran en los ramillos donde se produce la puesta, apenas llegan a medir 1, 5 mm de largo. La oruga pasa por 5 estadíos, variando su coloración a lo largo del proceso desde el gris claro hasta un verde cobre pálido. En su último estadío la oruga tiene la cabeza y el pronoto de color negro y abundantes punteaduras del mismo color por el cuerpo. Antes de crisalidar habrá alcanzado una longitud de entre 15 y 20 mm y una anchura de unos 2,5 mm. Las pupas son de color marrón oscuro, alargadas, de unos 10 mm de longitud. CICLO BIOLÓGICO Los huevos eclosionan entre mediados de marzo y abril. La larva se dirige a las yemas donde realiza un agujero por donde penetra para iniciar su alimentación.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus ×Coutinhoi Samp. Discovered in Australia Charlie Buttigieg
    XXX International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society …the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 1 International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society … the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 International Oak Society Officers and Board of Directors 2012-2015 Officers President Béatrice Chassé (France) Vice-President Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Belgium) Secretary Gert Fortgens (The Netherlands) Treasurer James E. Hitz (USA) Board of Directors Editorial Committee Membership Director Chairman Emily Griswold (USA) Béatrice Chassé Tour Director Members Shaun Haddock (France) Roderick Cameron International Oaks Allen Coombes Editor Béatrice Chassé Shaun Haddock Co-Editor Allen Coombes (Mexico) Eike Jablonski (Luxemburg) Oak News & Notes Ryan Russell Editor Ryan Russell (USA) Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven International Editor Roderick Cameron (Uruguay) Website Administrator Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven For contributions to International Oaks contact Béatrice Chassé [email protected] or [email protected] 0033553621353 Les Pouyouleix 24800 St.-Jory-de-Chalais France Author’s guidelines for submissions can be found at http://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/author-guidelines-journal-ios © 2014 International Oak Society Text, figures, and photographs © of individual authors and photographers. Graphic design: Marie-Paule Thuaud / www.lecentrecreatifducoin.com Photos. Cover: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Quercus macrocalyx Hickel & A. Camus); p. 6: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Q. oxyodon Miq.); p. 7: Béatrice Chassé (Q. acerifolia (E.J. Palmer) Stoynoff & W. J. Hess); p. 9: Eike Jablonski (Q. ithaburensis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)
    Machado_Pruebas 27/12/10 12:51 Página 233 Graellsia, 66(2): 233-280 julio-diciembre 2010 ISSN: 0367-5041 doi:10.3989/graellsia.2010.v66.025 LA MORFOLOGÍA DE LAPAROCERUS UNDATUS WOLLASTON, 1864 Y CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE LA TRIBU LAPAROCERINI LACORDAIRE, 1863 (COLEOPTERA, CURCULIONIDAE, ENTIMINAE) A. Machado* RESUMEN A. Machado. 2010. La morfología de Laparocerus undatus Wollaston, 1864 y consideracio- nes sobre la tribu Laparocerini Lacordaire, 1863 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae). Graellsia, 66(2): 233-280. Se presenta un estudio morfológico de Laparocerus undatus Wollaston, 1864 que com- prende la anatomía externa e interna del adulto, incluido el canal alimentario, sistema ner- vioso central y sistema reproductor. También se describen las anatomías de la larva y de la pupa, hasta ahora desconocidas en el género. Los Laparocerus son curculiónidos entimi- nos que muestran algunos caracteres primitivos infrecuentes en el grupo. Se plantea si se justifica o no mantener la tribu Laparocerini, pendiente de revisión desde que fuera esta- blecida por Lacordaire en 1863. Se discuten las semejanzas halladas en los caracteres ima- ginales y preimaginales con otros géneros y tribus, y se buscan las relaciones genéticas más cercanas empleando secuencias parciales del gen 16SrRNA de una veintena de espe- cies, obtenidas de GenBank. Laparocerus presenta importantes caracteres singulares o combinación de ellos, y se separa claramente de los demás Entiminae estudiados, ocupan- do una posición posiblemente basal dentro del grupo. Se proponen algunos
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Leaves of Eastern Native Oaks
    FHTET-2003-01 January 2003 Front Cover: Clockwise from top left: white oak (Q. alba) acorns; willow oak (Q. phellos) leaves and acorns; Georgia oak (Q. georgiana) leaf; chinkapin oak (Q. muehlenbergii) acorns; scarlet oak (Q. coccinea) leaf; Texas live oak (Q. fusiformis) acorns; runner oak (Q. pumila) leaves and acorns; background bur oak (Q. macrocarpa) bark. (Design, D. Binion) Back Cover: Swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii) leaves and acorns. (Design, D. Binion) FOREST HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE TEAM TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Oak Identification Field Guide to Native Oak Species of Eastern North America John Stein and Denise Binion Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505 Robert Acciavatti Forest Health Protection Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry USDA Forest Service 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505 United States Forest FHTET-2003-01 Department of Service January 2003 Agriculture NORTH AMERICA 100th Meridian ii iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank all those who helped with this publication. We are grateful for permission to use the drawings illustrated by John K. Myers, Flagstaff, AZ, published in the Flora of North America, North of Mexico, vol. 3 (Jensen 1997). We thank Drs. Cynthia Huebner and Jim Colbert, U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Disturbance Ecology and Management of Oak-Dominated Forests, Morgantown, WV; Dr. Martin MacKenzie, U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, Morgantown, WV; Dr. Steven L. Stephenson, Department of Biology, Fairmont State College, Fairmont, WV; Dr. Donna Ford-Werntz, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi and Their Potential As Biological Control Agents of Beech Bark Disease
    Fungi and their potential as biological control agents of Beech Bark Disease By Sarah Elizabeth Thomas A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway, University of London 2014 1 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I, Sarah Elizabeth Thomas, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: _____________ Date: 4th May 2014 2 ABSTRACT Beech bark disease (BBD) is an invasive insect and pathogen disease complex that is currently devastating American beech (Fagus grandifolia) in North America. The disease complex consists of the sap-sucking scale insect, Cryptococcus fagisuga and sequential attack by Neonectria fungi (principally Neonectria faginata). The scale insect is not native to North America and is thought to have been introduced there on seedlings of F. sylvatica from Europe. Conventional control strategies are of limited efficacy in forestry systems and removal of heavily infested trees is the only successful method to reduce the spread of the disease. However, an alternative strategy could be the use of biological control, using fungi. Fungal endophytes and/or entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) could have potential for both the insect and fungal components of this highly invasive disease. Over 600 endophytes were isolated from healthy stems of F. sylvatica and 13 EPF were isolated from C. fagisuga cadavers in its centre of origin. A selection of these isolates was screened in vitro for their suitability as biological control agents. Two Beauveria and two Lecanicillium isolates were assessed for their suitability as biological control agents for C.
    [Show full text]