Women, the early development of sociological research methods in Britain, and the London School of Economics: A (partially) retrieved history Abstract Histories of sociology have concentrated on the development of theory rather than methods. This paper examines the work of five women researchers associated with the London School of Economics in the early twentieth century to highlight an aspect of this neglected history: the development of research methods. Mildred Bulkley, Maud Davies, Amy Harrison, Bessie Hutchins and Varvara De Vesselitsky all carried out empirical research on the sociology of work, women and the household deploying multiple research methods, including surveys, interviews, observations, covert ethnography, and diaries and schedules for recording household diets and finances. Their work combined a sensitivity to social context and lived experience within a framework integrating the drive to social reform with a focus on scientific sociology. Very little of this work is known today. An awareness of it changes our understanding of disciplinary history, particularly with respect to the provenance of research methods, and their role in establishing of academic sociology. Keywords History of sociology, London School of Economics, research methods, women Ann Oakley Social Science Research Unit UCL Institute of Education 18 Woburn Square London WC1H ONR
[email protected] 1 Introduction As Platt and others have argued, histories of sociology and social science have tended to focus on theory rather than methods (Platt, 1996); Lengermann and Niebrugge, 1998). Within histories of methodology, survey methods have received by far the most attention, with the standard historical accounts privileging the survey work of figures such as Charles Booth, Seebohm Rowntree, and A.