DOCSLIB.ORG

Re-Visioning the Emergence of Solution Focused Practicejw

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Re-Visioning the Emergence of Solution Focused Practicejw Re-Visioning the Emergence of Solution-Focused Practice Jonas Wells Shares Rumours on SF History Solution Focus in Organisations (SFiO) Sunday 30 June 2019 – Global online Before we start… ”You can never predict the future by the past, because the past is changing all the time.” Michail Bakhtin ”It is perhaps difficult to see just how radical solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) is without looking at its historical roots.” Insoo Kim Berg __________________________________________________ For me: a) Research into book of SF assumptions and presuppositions b) Fascination with comment by Peter de Jong about early SF c) About being intellectually honest (in my role as trainer) Let’s interact and learn a little from each other! Invitation to write in the chat room - What would please you the most to be different from our time together here? Outline of today’s seminar • Have a look at an attempted chronology/timeline of SF development • Go briefly through Milton Erickson and MRI • Spend more time looking at the early period of SF (before it was called SF) • Explore the radicality of Steve de Shazer • A cheer for Eve Lipchik • How it all changed again with the ”nymphomania case” • Lessons and questions for future SF development Beginnings with Milton H. Erickson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kXZCdL9GWQ From Milton (article 1954, 1000 case files, Jay Haley’s writing): • Idea of utilisation – use what’s there • Future-oriented method of working • Non-normative (not prescriptive) • Outlandish tasks • Therapist as responsible for results • Notion of making therapy as short as possible • Faith in people’s resources and their ability to know what he/she needs Mental Research Institute in Palo Alto • Beginnings of brief therapy (as an alternative to traditional psychiatry) • Gregory Bateson and systems thinking • Don Jackson, Paul Watzlawick, John Weakland, Jay Haley etc: - Not so much the problem, but client’s way of solving it that inadvertently perpetuates it. Therefore, task is to interrupt ineffective attempted solutions - Focus on observable behavioural interaction in the present - No attempt to understand problem or underlying causes – stay on the surface - Promoting change rather than insight, understanding or growth - Small steps is enough - Shift from what’s inside and why to what’s between and what’s next - Working model of the observing team and task of designing interventions Enter the radicality of Steve de Shazer • A tale of a social worker’s (mis)understanding of Milton H. Erickson • Does not try to explain, only describe • Research question: ”What is the therapist doing that is useful?” Changes in 1980s to ”What is the therapist and client doing that is useful?” • Not after a theory of human behaviour, instead a theory of therapy • A true believer of interaction – therefore impossibe to theorise outside of the interaction in which the behaviour takes place • The client particular way of cooperating replaces resistance as reason for therapy • Envisions descriptions of therapy interaction in no less than three paradigms in Brief Therapy. Steve discards the former as he goes along: 1. Systemic (MRI style), 2. Ecosystemic, 3. Poststructural/Wittgensteinian and Social constructionist (and lays path open for small step 4. Enactivism/Embodiment) The early period of SF development • Recursive element: Research, theory and practice (I’d like to add socio-cultural context to this somehow) • A colourful group with similar stance: SdS, Insoo, Eve Lipchik, Elam Nunnaly, Jim Derks, Marilyn LaCourt etc • Counting head nods – points study to look at what therapist is doing (leads to cooperating) • Co-operating replaces resistance (Death of Resistance) • A client’s desire for more positive feedback changes idea of system • The case of the family with 27 problems: First Formula Session Task • Eco-systemic approach developed – Mechanic and enginieering to Maps and Model • Three versions of how the Miracle Question came about • Experimentation with language in interview • The idea of skeleton keys How about we play with a scene from 1985? We are going reenact a short dialogue from this point in time in 1985. I need two volunteers: • Who wants to play Brian Cade? • Who wants to play Steve de Shazer? I will put the script in the chat room. Brian Cade and Steve De Shazer discussion 1985 Keys to Solution: The Wizard of Oz Technique. Dialogue 1985 Brian: Your approach seems very similar, in some ways, to that of Milton Erickson, in that he believed that people have a vast reservoir of abilities and that therapy was not a (Cade, B. W. 1985, The Wizard of Oz approach to brief family therapy: An interview with process of putting something into people, or replacing deficiencies, but of unlocking what Steve de Shazer, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 6: 95-97.) is already available to them. Steve: We now believe that interventions need only fit the constraints of the problematic situation much as a skeleton key fits a lock. Steve: Absolutely. We call this the Wizard of Oz technique. We don’t give them anything that they haven’t already got. For instance, to give you one example, a couple Brian: People usually associate each lock with having its own unique key. So the idea of came in and I asked the husband what it was that had brought them here. He said that the skeleton key is presumably an important one? some of their fights led to physical violence. I turned immediately to the wife and asked what happens when they don’t. We spent the rest of the session talking about what Steve: Yes. You don’t need to know the precise nature of a lock to use a skeleton key, happens when they don’t get physically violent with each other. I never found out about and a fairly small bunch of skeleton keys is all that is needed to be able to open a vast the fight pattern; I’ve no idea who got violent with whom. range of locks to help people get on with their futures – and that’s how you judge your effectiveness; if the key works and you can open the door. Brian: Which, traditionally, a therapist would be primarily concerned with finding out; Brian: So that means that, in therapy, you don’t have to be so concerned with who did what, and to whom, and how often, etc. etc. ascertaining the precise nature of the problem?... Steve: Including me, four or five years ago. Steve: Correct. There are cases in which you can do the whole therapy without needing to know what the problem or complaint is. It is sometimes useful to have some ideas Brian: So you are particularly concerned with what people are already doing well. When about how the client perceives the problem in order to know how to frame people come into therapy they have usually become preoccupied with what is going interventions but, theoretically, it is not necessary. badly and are not aware of the many things that they are also doing quite competently. Steve: Yes; most of the time. (Cade, 1985, p. 96) Eve Lipchik’s role in SF development • Holocaust survivor • Prioritizes relation to client; uncomfortable with interruptions in the interview; argues that anything in the suprasystem can lead to change • Early champion of interview as more important than intervention • Very early asks ”how will you know when you don’t need to come here anymore?” • First to use question: ”is something of this miracle happening already?” • Coping questions • ”Listen with a constructive ear” – connected to death of resistance idea • Pioneers SF work in context of domestic violence The Nymphomania Case • Wife and husband come to therapy, ”a case of nymphomania” • Wife resists talk of exceptions, she wanted sex uncontaminated by compulsion, sees it as a problem requiring ”deep therapy”. • Turns to husband who felt reduced to a stud: ”For me, it’s a sleep problem”, Wife: ”Do you have any cures for insomnia?” • Cooperation on the construction of a solution ensued. Two weeks later everything is fine. • Implications: Complaint is undecidable. Words are not representations. New meaning of problem emerges in the context that fitted the client. • Signals that misunderstanding is most probable in interaction • Wittgenstein: ”We can only know what a word means by how the participants in the conversation use it” • Case fits best with post-structural discourse – Reality and meaning are developed through negotiation, are not discovered or uncovered, there is no deep structure to reveal. Giveaways – tentative learnings for me today 1. • Experience, not knowledge • Participation/Acceptance/Openness, not manipulation or control • Dialogue/Dialectic, not methodology = SF as an investigation of POSSIBILITIES, not actualities 2. • Importance of ethics and personal politics • Learning SF is a process, in time, of thinking on your own and together with others about assumptions/presuppositions and how they show (and make effect) in interaction observed in practice. It takes two. • Taking clients seriously – to thus listen very carefully = SF as a RESPONSE-based approach to change, not question-lead Further investigation for me… • What is the intellectually developed nature of Buddhism/Taoism in regards to SF thinking and practice? Precious little written on this in the history even though its regarded as central. Which implications on practice would it have if this was expanded upon? • The historical significance of John Weakland (compared to Gregory Bateson) on SF development. He seems to be much more influential over time. What is it in Weakland’s way of working that we could be made more aware of, and what difference would that make? • The ethics of Eve Lipchik and Yvonne Dolan bring a sensitivity worth exploring further. Open and true with their own view. Deals with politics in an overt and respectful way, much like how Narrative Therapy does but more subtly and less intrusive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An American Healer
    MHE book FINAL 4/19/06 9:25 AM Page 1 MILTON H. ERICKSON, M.D. AN AMERICAN HEALER Edited by Betty Alice Erickson, M.S. and Bradford Keeney, Ph.D. MHE book FINAL 4/19/06 9:25 AM Page 2 First published by Ringing Rocks Press in association with Leete’s Island Books (in paperback ISBN 0918172551). This edition published by Crown House Publishing Ltd Crown Buildings, Bancyfelin, Carmarthen, Wales, SA33 5ND, UK www.crownhouse.co.uk and Crown House Publishing Company LLC PO Box 2223, Williston, VT 05495, USA www.crownhousepublishing.com © Betty Alice Erickson The right of Betty Alice Erickson to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under current legislation no part of this work may be photocopied, stored in a retrieval system, published, performed in public, adapted, broadcast, transmitted, recorded or reproduced in any form or by any means, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. Enquiries should be addressed to Crown House Publishing Limited. • Thanks to The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis for permission to reprint the 1965 paper by Milton H. Erickson on page 217. • Excerpt from ISLA NEGRA by Pablo Neruda, translated by Alastair Reid. Translation copyright © 1981 by Alastair Reid. Reprinted by permission of Farrar, Straus and Giroux. • Thanks to Maypop Books, Athens, GA. for permission to reprint the Rumi quote on page 347, translated by Coleman Barks from his book, Delicious laughter: rambunctious teaching stories from the Mathnawi of Jelaluddin Rumi, published in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Retomando a Don D. Jackson, Pionero De La
    Retomando a Don D. Jackson, pionero de la terapia familiar 9 sistémica: Una aproximación a su trayectoria profesional Returning to Don D. Jackson, a pioneer of systemic family therapy: An approach to his professional career Daniel Venturaa aUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México. [email protected] Historia editorial Resumen Recibido: 29-05-2016 A pesar que la figura de Don Jackson fue uno de los referentes más importantes Primera revisión: 27-08-2016 en los inicios de la terapia familiar, ya que a través de un elaborado cuerpo Aceptado: 23-11-2016 teórico, legó la base conceptual que permitió comprender a la familia como un sistema relacional, en la actualidad su pensamiento ha sido poco reconocido, perdiendo de vista que los diferentes modelos de terapia con enfoque sistémico, contienen en sus articulaciones conceptuales y técnicos, premisas del trabajo Palabras clave de este pionero. Por lo cual, el objetivo de este artículo es señalar la pertinencia terapia sistémica, Don Jackson, de retomar el pensamiento de Don D. Jackson e invitar a lector a adentrarse en su obra. Para ello, se presenta una descripción acerca de su trayectoria pioneros de la terapia familiar, profesional en la que se puntualizan algunos de los aspectos más relevantes historia de la terapia familiar, de sus aportaciones, divididos en tres grandes facetas: 1) su transición dentro terapia del MRI del campo de la psiquiatría norteamericana, 2) su papel como investigador de la comunicación humana y el estudio de la esquizofrenia y 3) investigador y promotor del estudio de la familia. El recorrido culmina enunciando las obras más citadas de Don Jackson, con la intención de que sirvan como guía para acercarse a su pensamiento.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay Haley Collection, 1957-2007 M1733
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt6870384x No online items Guide to the Jay Haley Collection, 1957-2007 M1733 Andrea Castillo Department of Special Collections and University Archives July 2011 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Jay Haley Collection, M1733 1 1957-2007 M1733 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Jay Haley collection creator: Haley, Jay source: Richeport-Haley, Madeleine Identifier/Call Number: M1733 Physical Description: 28 Linear Feet(55 boxes) Date (inclusive): 1957-2007 Abstract: The Jay Haley collection, consisting of 28 linear feet and spanning from the 1950s to 2007, documents Haley’s career through correspondence, papers, book typescripts, and media materials. Among Haley’s papers documenting his multiple professional activities are his writings on: psychotherapy as a profession; teaching therapy; studies on Milton H. Erickson M. D.; the Bateson Project; marriage and family therapy; schizophrenia; his work with the Philadelphia Child Guidance Clinic, and his activities as editor for the Journal Family Process. The collection also includes Haley’s fiction writings, and his training films on topics such as: strategic and family therapy, Milton H. Erickson M.D., documentation of specific cases, and trance and dance in Bali. Physical Description: The collection contains paper and audio visual materials Access to Collection Accession 2009-287 is conditionally open for research, with written authorization required in accordance with Special Collections and University Archives Access to Health Information of Individuals Policy. Also case studies in series 3.3 and 8.5 are closed and will be available one hundred years from the date of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Weakland (1919-1995): Tribute to a Pioneer
    0 The Association for Family Therapy 1995. Published by Blackwell Publishcrs, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 IJF, UK and 238 Main Strcct, Cambridge, MA, USA. Journal of Family Therapy (1995) 17: 357-362 0163-4445 John H. Weakland (1919-1995): Tribute to a pioneer Brian Cade” On Saturday, 8 July 1995, John Weakland died aged 76. Illness had earlier forced him to retire from the Mental Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, where he had been a senior research fellow and a co- director of the Brief Therapy Center. He was also Clinical Associate Professor Emeritus in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine. John started out as a chemical engineer but found himself increasingly interested in human behaviour. He attended a couple of courses in anthropology run in New York by Gregory Bateson and subsequently changed career in his late twenties, studying anthro- pology at Columbia University with a particular interest in Chinese culture. In 1952, Gregory Bateson was in New York seeking a grant for a research project into the Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. He was staying with his former student. As John remembered it: He came home one afternoon and said, ‘I’ve got a research grant!’ I said, ‘That’s nice.’ And he said, ‘How would you like to come out to the West Coast and work for me?’ Under the circumstances, I said, ‘Great!’ We all went out and had dinner and celebrated. (Lipset, 1980; p. 200) Joined the following year by Jay Haley and William Fry, they formed a highly creative, prolific and influential research group, producing many of the early seminal papers in the family therapy field.
    [Show full text]
  • Terapia Centrata Sull'interazione. L'eredità Di Don Jackson
    Rivista Europea di Terapia Breve Strategica e Sistemica N. 1 - 2004 Terapia centrata sull’interazione. L’eredità di Don Jackson Wendel A. Ray ¹-² Abstract Don D. Jackson è stato uno dei più prolifici pionieri degli esordi della terapia familiare e della terapia breve, colui che ha letteralmente fondato la disciplina. Il lavoro pionieristico svolto negli anni ’50 e ’60 da Jackson e dai suoi colleghi, prima nell’ambito dei progetti di ricerca di Bateson e poi al Mental Research Institute, permea la maggioranza degli attuali approcci sistemici alla terapia: dal Modello della Terapia Breve sviluppata dopo la morte di Jackson al M.R.I., al lavoro strategico di Jay Haley e Cloe Madanes, dal modello strutturale sviluppato da Salvador Minuchin, al lavoro della Scuola di Milano e alla terapia breve centrata sulla soluzione di Steve de Shazer. L’autore ripercorre la carriera di Jackson, stroncata a soli 48 anni da una morte tragica e inaspettata, attraverso i suoi successi e i contributi dati alla fondazione della Teoria Interazionale e la sua applicazione clinica al settore della Terapia Breve e Familiare. Il modello cibernetico e le nozioni di base circa i sistemi, il costruttivismo sociale, parlare il linguaggio del cliente, utilizzare domande circolari, prescrivere comportamenti, tutti questi sono solo una parte delle modalità attraverso cui Jackson ha influenzato l’attuale lavoro di gran parte dei modelli di terapia familiare e breve. Come cemento che tiene insieme i mattoni, i contributi di Jackson continuano ad essere l’elemento di coesione che lega molti degli attuali orientamenti sistemici – una testimonianza della vitalità, del coraggio e della lungimirante visione di Don D.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction Focused Therapy the Don Jackson Legacy
    Brief Strategic and Systemic Therapy European Review N. 1 - 2004 Interaction Focused Therapy The Don Jackson Legacy Wendel A. Ray ¹-² Abstract Don D. Jackson was one of the most prolific pioneers of the family and brief therapy, the founder of this discipline. This pioneering work was carried out by Jackson and his colleagues around the 1950s and the 1960s, first together with G. Bateson and then at the Mental Research Institute. His works still influences most of the systemic approaches of therapy still in use till the very day: from the brief therapy model developed after the death of Jackson at M.R.I. to the strategic work of Jay Haley and Cloe Madanes, from the structural model developed by Salvador Minuchin, to the work of the Milan School and the solution-focused therapy of De Shazer. The author revisits Jackson’s career, which was brought to an end at an age of 48 years by a tragic and unexpected death, recollecting his successes and his contributions in the founding of the International Theory and its application to brief and family therapy. The cybernetic model together with the basic notions regarding systems, social constructivism, the use of circular questioning and others are only a fragment of the influence generated by Jackson on the majority of the brief and family therapy models. Just like clay that holds together the foundation blocks, Jackson’s contributions continue to be the cohesive element that bounds most of our present systemic approaches- these act as a testimony of the vitality, the courage and the far-sighting vision of Don D.
    [Show full text]
  • GREGORY BATESON on DEUTERO-LEARNING and DOUBLE BIND: Base of 1St a BRIEF CONCEPTUAL HISTORY Line of ART
    JHBS—WILEY RIGHT BATCH Top of ID Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 39(3), 269–278 Summer 2003 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.10112 ᭧ 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. GREGORY BATESON ON DEUTERO-LEARNING AND DOUBLE BIND: Base of 1st A BRIEF CONCEPTUAL HISTORY line of ART MAX VISSER The concepts of deutero-learning and double bind have acquired an increasingly important status in various fields of social and behavioral science, particularly in psychiatry, psy- chotherapy, organization, and policy science. With this proliferation, however, their orig- inal meaning and significance has become increasingly muted. In this article it is argued that both concepts are important ingredients of a behavioral theory of (organizational) learning. To support this argument, the development of both concepts is traced to the work of Gregory Bateson. In Bateson’s thinking, the two concepts have a firm base in dyadic behavior and interaction. ᭧ 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The concepts of deutero-learning and double bind have acquired an increasingly impor- tant status in various fields of social and behavioral science. Defined very briefly as, respec- tively, “learning to learn” and “pathological deutero-learning,” the concepts have become influential in the work of the so-called Palo Alto and Milan schools in psychiatry and psy- chotherapy (Abeles, 1976; Bateson, Jackson, Haley, & Weakland, 1956; Burbatti & Formenti, 1988; Burbatti, Castoldi, & Maggi, 1993; Haley, 1963; Koopmans, 2001; Ruesch & Bateson, 1951; Sluzki & Veron, 1971; Watzlawick, Bavelas, & Jackson, 1967). In more recent years, the concepts have gained prominence in the fields of organization and policy science as an integral part of “organizational learning” (Argyris & Scho¨n, 1978, 1996; Dopson & Neumann, 1998; French & Bazalgette, 1996; Hennestad, 1990; Hirschhorn & Gilmore, 1980; Huysman, 2000; Scho¨n, 1975; Sinkula, 1994; Wijnhoven, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Solution-Focused Approach
    International Journal of Solution-Focused Practices Copyright © 2013 by the Author. By virtue of publication in IJSFP, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1, 10-17 this article is free to use with proper attribution in educational and DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14335/ijsfp.v1i1.10 other non-commercial settings. ISSN 2001-5453 (Print) ISSN 2001-6980 (Online) www.ijsfp.com The Origin of the Solution-Focused Approach Coert F. Visser Psychologist doctorandus and master in management consultancy Abstract The solution-focused approach to therapy and coaching has its roots in the work done by therapists in the second half of the twentieth century. This article discusses some important precursors, such as Milton Erickson and the Mental Research Institute. Further, it shows how the members of the Brief Family Therapy Center, led by Insoo Kim Berg and Steve de Shazer, developed the core of the solution-focused approach in the 1980s. Key concepts and publications are discussed and a description is given of how the team members worked together closely to find out what works in therapy. Keywords: solution-focused, BFTC, solution-focused history, de Shazer, Berg The solution-focused approach is now an established so that it could be solved. Causes were thought to be hidden psychotherapy and coaching approach for which there is a away deep in the psyche of the patient and were often good evidence base (Franklin, Trepper, Gingerich, & related to unresolved problems in early childhood McCollum, 2011; Gingerich & Peterson, 2013). Both (Seligman, 1990). Furthermore, patients were generally solution-focused interventions such as the miracle question, thought to resist treatment unconsciously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mental Research Institute Approach As Applied to School Settings
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1993 The Mental Research Institute Approach as Applied to School Settings Paul E. O'Malley Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation O'Malley, Paul E., "The Mental Research Institute Approach as Applied to School Settings" (1993). Master's Theses. 3939. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3939 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1993 Paul E. O'Malley THE MENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE APPROACH AS APPLIED TO SCHOOL SETTINGS by Paul E. O'Malley A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts May 1993 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the faculty and staff of Loyola University, Chicago, Community Counseling Program for all of their encouragement and support. In particular, I am grateful to the director of my thesis, James Moran, S.J., Ph.D., Manuel Silverman, Ph.D., reader of my thesis and Gloria Lewis Ph.D., my advisor. Dr. Moran, Dr. Silverman and Dr. Lewis showed continued support and dedication to my efforts. I would like to thank my parents, Michael and Dorothy O'Malley.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Down the Bone
    TeacherO’Neil, Education Weibust, Quarterly, and Emard Fall 1994 Research Down the Bone By Frances L. O’Neil, Patricia S. Weibust, and Patricia A. Emard By education most have been misled: They believe, because they were so bred. The priest continues what the nurse began, And thus the child imposes on Frances L. O’Neil is an the man. associate professor of —John Dryden,“The Hind and the Panther” psychology at Tunxis In a recommendation offered to the Regents of Community -Technical the University of California in 1978, the acclaimed College in Farmington, anthropologist Gregory Bateson (1979) stated that Connecticut; Patricia S. the basic premises on which all our teaching is based Weibust is an associate are obsolete, and that one of the most egregious professor of educational errors is: studies, School of Education, University of ...our anti-aesthetic assumption borrowed from Connecticut, Storrs; and the emphasis which Bacon, Locke, and Newton Patricia A. Emard is a long ago gave to the physical sciences, viz. that research associate, all phenomena (including the mental) can and shall be studied and evaluated in quantitative Mental Research Institute, terms. (p. 235) Palo Alto, California. 103 Research Down the Bone He suggested, instead, that in examining biology and behavior “systems theory, cybernetics, holistic medicine, ecology, and gestalt psychology” (p. 236) offered much more fruitful approaches. One Educational Reconstructionist’s View of Research The educational philosopher, Theodore Brameld (1950), had written prolifi- cally 30years earlier about this lag in educational thought. Indeed, he had carried out two intensive studies of educational systems using an action research approach.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Family Therapy
    Page 1 An Introduction to Family Therapy SYSTEMIC THEORY AND PRACTICE Third edition 09:28:10:03:10 Page 1 Page 2 09:28:10:03:10 Page 2 Page 3 An Introduction to Family Therapy SYSTEMIC THEORY AND PRACTICE Third edition Rudi Dallos and Ros Draper 09:28:10:03:10 Page 3 Page 4 Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education McGraw-Hill House Shoppenhangers Road Maidenhead Berkshire England SL6 2QL email: [email protected] world wide web: www.openup.co.uk and Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121-2289, USA First published 2000 Second edition 2005 Reprinted 2007, 2008 First published in this third edition 2010 Copyright © Rudi Dallos and Ros Draper 2010 All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency Limited. Details of such licences (for reprographic reproduction) may be obtained from the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd of Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London, EC1N 8TS. A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library ISBN-13: 978-0-33-523801-9 ISBN-10: 0-33-523801-7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data CIP data applied for Typeset by RefineCatch Limited, Bungay, Suffolk Printed in the UK by Bell and Bain Ltd., Glasgow Fictitious names of companies, products, people, characters and/or data that may be used herein (in case studies or in examples) are not intended to represent any real individual, company, product or event.
    [Show full text]
  • Reseña Histórica De La Terapia Familiar Y Posmodernas
    Mandujano, S. (2006). Programa de maestría y doctorado en psicología. Residencia en terapia familiar sistémica. Reporte de experiencia profesional. México: FES Iztacala, UNAM Reseña histórica de la terapia familiar y posmodernas. Si Gregory Bateson es el padre teórico de la perspectiva “interaccional sistémica” en Psicología y Psiquiatría, Milton Erickson representa el maestro a quien hay que remitirse para las estrategias de aplicación clínica y para la modificación en breve tiempo de las situaciones disfuncionales. Este capitulo, no pretende hacer un análisis detallado de la historia de la Terapia Sistémica. Más bien, será descriptivo en términos de los años, personajes y de algunos eventos significativos que le dieron forma (algunos de ellos resaltado en negrillas). 1942. Lugar: Nueva York. Frank Freemont Smith, director de la fundación Joshia Macy, propició uno de los giros epistemológicos más importantes en el campo de la ciencia al patrocinar una serie de conferencias (las Conferencias Macy) que promovieron nuevas formas de explicación no sólo en el campo de la ingeniería sino también en la biología y el área social. Milton Erickson, el psiquíatra e hipnoterapeuta más reconocido en Estados Unidos, tuvo su primer contacto con Gregory Bateson, al ser uno de los invitados para participar en los encuentros de la fundación Macy (Zeig, 1985). Observaciones. Wittezaele y García (1994), mencionan que a dichas conferencias acudieron expertos de diversas disciplinas, quienes manifestaron su interés por la estructura y el marco conceptual que se prefiguraba. Dentro de los exponentes más importantes destacaron los matemáticos Norbert Wiener y Walter Pitts, el fisiólogo Arturo Rosenblueth, el ingeniero químico John Von Neuman, el neurofisiólogo Warren McCulloch, el psiquiatra Milton Erickson y los antropólogos Margaret Mead y Gregory Bateson, entre otros.
    [Show full text]