Primary Immunodeficiencies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Case for Lupus Nephritis
Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Expanding the Role of Complement Therapies: The Case for Lupus Nephritis Nicholas L. Li * , Daniel J. Birmingham and Brad H. Rovin Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (D.J.B.); [email protected] (B.H.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-614-293-4997; Fax: +1-614-293-3073 Abstract: The complement system is an innate immune surveillance network that provides defense against microorganisms and clearance of immune complexes and cellular debris and bridges innate and adaptive immunity. In the context of autoimmune disease, activation and dysregulation of complement can lead to uncontrolled inflammation and organ damage, especially to the kidney. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by loss of tolerance, autoantibody production, and immune complex deposition in tissues including the kidney, with inflammatory consequences. Effective clearance of immune complexes and cellular waste by early complement components protects against the development of lupus nephritis, while uncontrolled activation of complement, especially the alternative pathway, promotes kidney damage in SLE. Therefore, complement plays a dual role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. Improved understanding of the contribution of the various complement pathways to the development of kidney disease in SLE has created an opportunity to target the complement system with novel therapies to improve outcomes in lupus nephritis. In this review, we explore the interactions between complement and the kidney in SLE and their implications for the treatment of lupus nephritis. Keywords: lupus nephritis; complement; systemic lupus erythematosus; glomerulonephritis Citation: Li, N.L.; Birmingham, D.J.; Rovin, B.H. -
Cells, Tissues and Organs of the Immune System
Immune Cells and Organs Bonnie Hylander, Ph.D. Aug 29, 2014 Dept of Immunology [email protected] Immune system Purpose/function? • First line of defense= epithelial integrity= skin, mucosal surfaces • Defense against pathogens – Inside cells= kill the infected cell (Viruses) – Systemic= kill- Bacteria, Fungi, Parasites • Two phases of response – Handle the acute infection, keep it from spreading – Prevent future infections We didn’t know…. • What triggers innate immunity- • What mediates communication between innate and adaptive immunity- Bruce A. Beutler Jules A. Hoffmann Ralph M. Steinman Jules A. Hoffmann Bruce A. Beutler Ralph M. Steinman 1996 (fruit flies) 1998 (mice) 1973 Discovered receptor proteins that can Discovered dendritic recognize bacteria and other microorganisms cells “the conductors of as they enter the body, and activate the first the immune system”. line of defense in the immune system, known DC’s activate T-cells as innate immunity. The Immune System “Although the lymphoid system consists of various separate tissues and organs, it functions as a single entity. This is mainly because its principal cellular constituents, lymphocytes, are intrinsically mobile and continuously recirculate in large number between the blood and the lymph by way of the secondary lymphoid tissues… where antigens and antigen-presenting cells are selectively localized.” -Masayuki, Nat Rev Immuno. May 2004 Not all who wander are lost….. Tolkien Lord of the Rings …..some are searching Overview of the Immune System Immune System • Cells – Innate response- several cell types – Adaptive (specific) response- lymphocytes • Organs – Primary where lymphocytes develop/mature – Secondary where mature lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells interact to initiate a specific immune response • Circulatory system- blood • Lymphatic system- lymph Cells= Leukocytes= white blood cells Plasma- with anticoagulant Granulocytes Serum- after coagulation 1. -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0115729 A1 Qin Et Al
US 201201.15729A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0115729 A1 Qin et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 10, 2012 (54) PROCESS FOR FORMING FILMS, FIBERS, Publication Classification AND BEADS FROM CHITNOUS BOMASS (51) Int. Cl (75) Inventors: Ying Qin, Tuscaloosa, AL (US); AOIN 25/00 (2006.01) Robin D. Rogers, Tuscaloosa, AL A6II 47/36 (2006.01) AL(US); (US) Daniel T. Daly, Tuscaloosa, tish 9.8 (2006.01)C (52) U.S. Cl. ............ 504/358:536/20: 514/777; 426/658 (73) Assignee: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 57 ABSTRACT ALABAMA, Tuscaloosa, AL (US) (57) Disclosed is a process for forming films, fibers, and beads (21) Appl. No.: 13/375,245 comprising a chitinous mass, for example, chitin, chitosan obtained from one or more biomasses. The disclosed process (22) PCT Filed: Jun. 1, 2010 can be used to prepare films, fibers, and beads comprising only polymers, i.e., chitin, obtained from a suitable biomass, (86). PCT No.: PCT/US 10/36904 or the films, fibers, and beads can comprise a mixture of polymers obtained from a suitable biomass and a naturally S3712). (4) (c)(1), Date: Jan. 26, 2012 occurring and/or synthetic polymer. Disclosed herein are the (2), (4) Date: an. AO. films, fibers, and beads obtained from the disclosed process. O O This Abstract is presented solely to aid in searching the sub Related U.S. Application Data ject matter disclosed herein and is not intended to define, (60)60) Provisional applicationpp No. 61/182,833,sy- - - s filed on Jun. -
Are Complement Deficiencies Really Rare?
G Model MIMM-4432; No. of Pages 8 ARTICLE IN PRESS Molecular Immunology xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Immunology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/molimm Review Are complement deficiencies really rare? Overview on prevalence, ଝ clinical importance and modern diagnostic approach a,∗ b Anete Sevciovic Grumach , Michael Kirschfink a Faculty of Medicine ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil b Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany a r a t b i c s t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: Complement deficiencies comprise between 1 and 10% of all primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) accord- Received 29 May 2014 ing to national and supranational registries. They are still considered rare and even of less clinical Received in revised form 18 June 2014 importance. This not only reflects (as in all PIDs) a great lack of awareness among clinicians and gen- Accepted 23 June 2014 eral practitioners but is also due to the fact that only few centers worldwide provide a comprehensive Available online xxx laboratory complement analysis. To enable early identification, our aim is to present warning signs for complement deficiencies and recommendations for diagnostic approach. The genetic deficiency of any Keywords: early component of the classical pathway (C1q, C1r/s, C2, C4) is often associated with autoimmune dis- Complement deficiencies eases whereas individuals, deficient of properdin or of the terminal pathway components (C5 to C9), are Warning signs Prevalence highly susceptible to meningococcal disease. Deficiency of C1 Inhibitor (hereditary angioedema, HAE) Meningitis results in episodic angioedema, which in a considerable number of patients with identical symptoms Infections also occurs in factor XII mutations. -
Stems for Nonproprietary Drug Names
USAN STEM LIST STEM DEFINITION EXAMPLES -abine (see -arabine, -citabine) -ac anti-inflammatory agents (acetic acid derivatives) bromfenac dexpemedolac -acetam (see -racetam) -adol or analgesics (mixed opiate receptor agonists/ tazadolene -adol- antagonists) spiradolene levonantradol -adox antibacterials (quinoline dioxide derivatives) carbadox -afenone antiarrhythmics (propafenone derivatives) alprafenone diprafenonex -afil PDE5 inhibitors tadalafil -aj- antiarrhythmics (ajmaline derivatives) lorajmine -aldrate antacid aluminum salts magaldrate -algron alpha1 - and alpha2 - adrenoreceptor agonists dabuzalgron -alol combined alpha and beta blockers labetalol medroxalol -amidis antimyloidotics tafamidis -amivir (see -vir) -ampa ionotropic non-NMDA glutamate receptors (AMPA and/or KA receptors) subgroup: -ampanel antagonists becampanel -ampator modulators forampator -anib angiogenesis inhibitors pegaptanib cediranib 1 subgroup: -siranib siRNA bevasiranib -andr- androgens nandrolone -anserin serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists altanserin tropanserin adatanserin -antel anthelmintics (undefined group) carbantel subgroup: -quantel 2-deoxoparaherquamide A derivatives derquantel -antrone antineoplastics; anthraquinone derivatives pixantrone -apsel P-selectin antagonists torapsel -arabine antineoplastics (arabinofuranosyl derivatives) fazarabine fludarabine aril-, -aril, -aril- antiviral (arildone derivatives) pleconaril arildone fosarilate -arit antirheumatics (lobenzarit type) lobenzarit clobuzarit -arol anticoagulants (dicumarol type) dicumarol -
Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine -
Hyperleukocytosis (Re)Visited- Is It Case Series Always Leukaemia: a Report of Two Pathology Section Cases and Review of Literature Short Communication
Review Article Clinician’s corner Original Article Images in Medicine Experimental Research Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2020/40556.13409 Case Report Postgraduate Education Hyperleukocytosis (Re)Visited- Is it Case Series always Leukaemia: A Report of Two Pathology Section Cases and Review of Literature Short Communication ASHUTOSH RATH1, RICHA GUPTA2 ABSTRACT Hyperleukocytosis is defined as total leukocyte count of more than 100×109/L. Commonly seen in leukaemic conditions, non- leukaemic causes are usually not encountered and thought of. We report two such non-malignant cases of hyperleukocytosis. A six-year old girl presented with fever, cough and respiratory distress with a leukocyte count of 125.97×109/L. Another case is of a two-month old female infant, who presented with fever and respiratory distress and a leukocyte count of 112.27×109/L. The present case thrives to highlight various possible causes of hyperleukocytosis with an emphasis on non-malignant causes. Also, important complications and management of hyperleukocytosis are discussed. Keywords: Benign, Leukocytosis, Leukostasis CASE REPORT 1 for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and was started A six-year-old girl was admitted with complaints of fever, non- on intravenous Vancomycin along with supportive care. Serial productive cough for one week and severe respiratory distress for monitoring of TLC revealed a gradual reduction and it returned to the the past one day. There was no other significant history. On physical baseline of 15×109/L after eight days. The patient was discharged examination, the patient had mild pallor. Respiratory examination after 10 days of hospital stay. -
Practice Parameter for the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Immunodeficiency
Practice parameter Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD, David A. Khan, MD, Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD, David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Chief Editor: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Co-Editor: David A. Khan, MD Members of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters: David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Khan, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Primary Immunodeficiency Workgroup: Chairman: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Members: Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Aerocrine; has received payment for lectures from Genentech/ These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck; and has received research support from Genentech/ the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Novartis and Merck. -
Synergistic Immunostimulating Activity of Pidotimod and Red Ginseng Acidic Polysaccharide Against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Immunosuppression
Arch Pharm Res Vol 31, No 9, 1153-1159, 2008 DOI 10.1007/s12272-001-1282-6 http://apr.psk.or.kr Synergistic Immunostimulating Activity of Pidotimod and Red Ginseng Acidic Polysaccharide against Cyclophosphamide-induced Immunosuppression Xiao Fei Du, Cheng Zhe Jiang1, Chun Fu Wu, Eun Kyung Won1, and Se Young Choung1 Department of Pharmacology, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China and 1Department of Hygienic Chemis- try and Kyung Hee East-West Pharmaceutical Research Institute, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea (Received May 6, 2008/Revised July 22, 2008/Accepted September 5, 2008) We investigated the synergistic effect of combined treatment with red ginseng acidic polysaccharide (RGAP) from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer and pidotimod in cyclophosphamide-treated mice. The combination of pidotimod and RGAP restored concanavalin A-induced splenic T cell proliferation and LPS-stimulated B cell proliferation significantly. The production of nitric oxide from peritoneal macrophages was increased by the combinations. NK cell activity was increased by RGAP alone or in combination with pidotimod. A synergistic increase in the level of serum IL-12 and interferon- gamm was observed when the combination of the two was used. RGAP alone or in combination with pidotimod modulated the level of serum C-reactive protein to a near-normal level. These results indi- cate that combinations of pidotimod and RGAP are synergistic and suggest that combination therapy using pidotimod and RGAP for improving immune activity may provide an additional benefit over the use of the two drugs by themselves. Key words: Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer, Red ginseng acidic polysaccharide, Pidotimod, Cyclophos- phamide, Immunostimulation, Combination INTRODUCTION et al., 1989), hypoglycemic activities (Konno et al., 1985; Konno et al., 1983), and antitumor activities (Lee et al., Panax ginseng C.A. -
European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID)
Journal of Clinical Immunology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-020-00754-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and European Reference Network on Rare Primary Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (ERN RITA) Complement Guideline: Deficiencies, Diagnosis, and Management Nicholas Brodszki1 & Ashley Frazer-Abel2 & Anete S. Grumach3 & Michael Kirschfink4 & Jiri Litzman5 & Elena Perez6 & Mikko R. J. Seppänen7 & Kathleen E. Sullivan8 & Stephen Jolles9 Received: 5 June 2019 /Accepted: 20 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract This guideline aims to describe the complement system and the functions of the constituent pathways, with particular focus on primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and their diagnosis and management. The complement system is a crucial part of the innate immune system, with multiple membrane-bound and soluble components. There are three distinct enzymatic cascade pathways within the complement system, the classical, alternative and lectin pathways, which converge with the cleavage of central C3. Complement deficiencies account for ~5% of PIDs. The clinical consequences of inherited defects in the complement system are protean and include increased susceptibility to infection, autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus), age-related macular degeneration, renal disorders (e.g., atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome) and angioedema. Modern complement analysis allows an in-depth insight into the functional and molecular basis of nearly all complement deficiencies. However, therapeutic options remain relatively limited for the majority of complement deficiencies with the exception of hereditary angioedema and inhibition of an overactivated complement system in regulation defects. Current management strategies for complement disor- ders associated with infection include education, family testing, vaccinations, antibiotics and emergency planning. Keywords Complement . -
Aspects of the Usage of Antineoplastic and 1Mmunomodulating Agents in a Section of the Private Health Care Sector
ASPECTS OF THE USAGE OF ANTINEOPLASTIC AND 1MMUNOMODULATING AGENTS IN A SECTION OF THE PRIVATE HEALTH CARE SECTOR Wilmarie Rheeders B. Pharm Dissertation submitted in Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy at the Faculty of Health Sciences of the North-West University, Potchefstroom, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Pharmaciae. Supervisor: Prof M.S. Lubbe Co-supervisor: Dr. J.L. Duminy Co-supervisor: Prof. M.P. Stander Potchefstroom November 2008 For all things are from Him, by Him, and for Him. Glory belongs to Him forever! Amen. (Rom. 11:36) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my Lord and Father whom I love, all the Glory! He gave me the strength, insight and endurance to finish this study. 1 also want to express my sincere appreciation to the following people that have contributed to this dissertation: • To Professor M.S. Lubbe, in her capacity as supervisor of this dissertation, my appreciation for her expert supervision, advice and time she invested in this study. • To Dr. J.L Duminy, oncologist and co-supervisor, for all the useful advice, assistance and time he put aside in the interest of this dissertation. • To Professor M.P. Stander, in his capacity as co-supervisor of this study. • To Professor J.H.P. Serfontein, for his guidance, time, effort and advice. • To the Department of Pharmacy Practice as well as the NRF for the technical and financial support. • To Anne-Marie, thank you for your patience, time and continuous effort you put into the data. • To the Pharmacy Benefit Management company for providing the data for this dissertation. -
ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID
ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID These criteria are only for patients with no genetic diagnosis*. *Exceptions: Atypical SCID, DiGeorge syndrome – a known genetic defect and confirmation of criteria is mandatory. Available entries (Please click on an entry to see the criteria.) Page Acquired angioedema .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Agammaglobulinemia .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Asplenia syndrome (Ivemark syndrome) ................................................................................................................................... 4 Ataxia telangiectasia (ATM) ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Atypical Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (Atypical SCID) ............................................................................................... 5 Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) ................................................................................................................ 5 APECED / APS1 with CMC - Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) .................. 5 Barth syndrome ...........................................................................................................................................................................