DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Services Legislation Amendment (No Jab, No Pay) Bill 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Services Legislation Amendment (No Jab, No Pay) Bill 2015 Submission: Social Services Legislation Amendment (No Jab, No Pay) Bill 2015 Overview: Government health policy should support the basic human right of informed consent to medical treatment. The coercive No Jab, No Pay policy denies us this right. There is significant historical, scientific and medical evidence that does not support government vaccination policy. Furthermore, vaccination policy is often informed by powerful vested interests and fraudulent studies, rather than independent, unbiased scientific evidence. Much of this evidence has been suppressed by pro-vaccine lobby groups, particularly pharmaceutical companies and others with vested interests, and by the mainstream media. So well has it been hidden that many (if not most) medical practitioners are not aware of this evidence. Scientists, medical practitioners and whistleblowers who are aware and speak out risk vilification, being ostracized, and even their careers - which is certainly a deterrent to others speaking out. These issues will be discussed in more detail below, with supporting evidence. 1. Informed Consent to Medical Treatment: The Medical Board of Australia's Code of Conduct for Doctors states in part: Informed consent is a person’s voluntary decision about medical care that is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved. See: http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx The "Australian Immunisation Handbook, 10th Edition" states in part: For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present: 1. It must be given by a person with legal capacity, and of sufficient intellectual capacity to understand the implications of being vaccinated. 2. It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation. 3. It must cover the specific procedure that is to be performed. 4. It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, risks of not having it and any alternative options have been explained to the individual. See:http://www.immunise.health.gov.au/internet/immunise/publishing.nsf/Content/Handbook10- home~handbook10part2~handbook10-2-1 Furthermore, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine states in part: An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks. The person concerned may freely withdraw consent at any time. See: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm Not only does the No Jab, No Pay policy negate the right to informed consent, but based on my family's experience, and as most parents can attest, it is very rare that doctors provide information regarding the potential risks of vaccination. And considering doctors are paid bonuses for vaccinating their young patients, it wouldn't serve their financial interests to provide such information. 2. Withholding information on safety concerns from parents and health practitioners: Excerpt from: "The Health Hazards of Disease Prevention" by Dr Damien Downing: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v07n02.shtml Vera Hassner Sharav writes: "Public health officials on both sides of the Atlantic have lost the public trust because they have been in league with vaccine manufacturers in denying that safety problems exist. If vaccines posed no safety problems why has the US Vaccine Court awarded more than $2 billion dollars to settle 2,500 cases involving vaccine-related debilitating injuries in children?" When US FDA officials analyzed the data on autism and thimerosal-containing vaccines they found a clear link. Their response, detailed in transcripts of a meeting at Simpsonwood, VA in July 2000 was to "massage" the data to make the link go away. In the UK, JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunization) has known since 1986 that there were serious safety concerns around vaccinations, for measles in particular. JCVI has repeatedly responded to negative data by ignoring it or covering it up, and has downplayed vaccine safety concerns while overplaying benefits. Deliberate concealing of information from parents for the purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule is shown in: 30 years of secret official transcripts show UK government experts cover up vaccine hazards (on the Child Health Safety website). The excerpt below from the paper, "The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination (JCVI): are they at odds?" by scientist, Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, is notable: Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice. See: http://nsnbc.me/wpcontent/uploads/2013/05/BSEM-2011.pdf Though the information above refers to the UK, the situation is the same in Australia, and in the USA. E.g. Nephrologist, Dr Suzanne Humphries, in part VI of her YouTube video series, "Vaccines-Honesty vs Policy," states: Doctors like me were never taught that decades of testing which showed that the flu vaccine was rubbish never saw the light of day. Today, the Cochrane writings on the ineffectiveness of the flu vaccine, and Dr Tom Jefferson's view that the flu vaccine is given as policy, not for scientific reasons, is little known. The information in Sir Graham Wilson's book (The Hazards of Immunization by Sir Graham S Wilson MD, LL D, FRGP, DPH) never made it to medical libraries or to medical doctors' consciousness. And: Even if vaccines can protect for some diseases for a period of time in a lifespan, which is the best they really can claim, the assurances given to both sick and well people regarding safety and effectiveness is not backed by science, history, or even a significant portion of the scientific and immunologic literature. See: Vaccines-Honesty vs Policy - Part VI. The Business of Vaccination. There is a culture of stifling debate on vaccination, pushed with a vengeance by the pro-vaccination lobby, such as the Australian Skeptics organisation, and aided and abetted by a biased media. This stifling of debate is certainly not scientific, nor in the interests of informed consent. One example was the forced cancellation of a seminar tour of a few Australian cities by vaccine expert Dr Sherri Tenpenny, that was to have taken place in March this year - due to threats of violence against venues hosting the seminars. A typical example of the media's misinformation is evident in the May 1, 2015 article, "Vaccine brings down cervical cancer cases," published online in the Weekly Times Now: http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/national/vaccine-brings-down-cervical-cancer-cases/story-fnjbnvyg- 1227329703643. The claim in the headline and first paragraph of this article, that there has been a sharp fall in the number of young Australian women being detected with signs of early cervical cancer since the introduction of the Gardasil vaccine, is a blatant lie. The current AIHW Cervical Screening in Australia Report, to which the article refers, actually states that "Both incidence and mortality halved between the introduction of the NCSP (The National Cervical Screening Program) in 1991 and the year 2002, and have since remained at around 9 new cases and 2 deaths per 100,000 women". Gardasil was only introduced in 2007, so has had NO impact on this low cervical cancer rate. Also, according to many sources, Gardasil is one of the most dangerous vaccines on the market, as it has caused an unprecedented number of serious adverse reactions, including a worrying number of deaths. US courts have paid out significantly more compensation to victims of Gardasil than any other vaccine. See: http://sanevax.org/vaccine-injury-compensation-program-gardasil-settlements/ In view of the risks, Japan has recently removed Gardasil from its recommended vaccine schedule; and court cases for people harmed by HPV vaccines have been started in France, India and Spain. E.g: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/supreme-court-in-india-to-rule-on-merck-fraud-regarding-hpv-vaccine- deaths/ Yet the mainstream media remains incredibly quiet about this, while also pushing for more uptake of this vaccine. 3. Evidence vaccines are not the life savers they are claimed to be: Two excerpts from "The Doctor's Dilemma" by Dr Jayne LM Donegan show that death rates of diseases supposedly lowered by vaccination, were in fact in steep decline well before vaccination was introduced: http://www.jayne-donegan.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/2009-The-Doctors-Dilemma- website.pdf: I was astonished and not a little perturbed ti (sic) find that when you draw a graph of the death rate from whooping cough that starts in the mid nineteenth century you can clearly see that at least 99% of the people who used to die of whooping cough in the nineteenth century and early twentieth century has (sic) stopped dying before the vaccine against whooping cough was introduced, initially in the 1950s and universally in the 1960s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 04 Winter Issue
    Winter 2004 ewsletter Vaccination Risk Awareness Network Inc. SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME OR SCURVY? INSIDE THIS ISSUE page By C. Alan B. Clemetson, M.D. 1 - Shaken Baby Syndrome or There has undoubtedly been a grave also jaundice, which was still evident Scurvy miscarriage of justice in the conviction four weeks after leaving hospital. His 1 - Pushing the Vaccine Agenda of Alan Yurko of Orlando, Florida, health was further impaired when he 3 - VRAN News who was accused of “shaken baby syn- received six inoculations (for diphthe- drome” and was sentenced to life ria, whooping cough, tetanus, influen- 13 - Archie Kalokerinos, MD imprisonment for murder. The error za B, oral polio vaccine, and hepatitis 15 - Rubella Vaccination seems to have arisen because of fash- B at eight weeks of age. 18 - Rubella in Babies & ionable adherence to a diagnosis now Actually, the autopsy findings of Pregnant Women in vogue, and from a desire to blame subdural hemorrhage, four broken one single preventable occurrence for ribs, severe anemia, and a few bruises 21 - Vaccines & Autism - IOM an infant death. Everything is supposed are characteristic of Barlow’s disease, Testimonies to be preventable nowadays. or infantile scurvy, but that diagnosis 25 - Letters Surely Alan held his 10-week-old son went out of fashion many years ago, so 31 - Dr. McCandless - Autism by the heels and slapped him on the no blood analysis for vitamin C or for bottom after he began wheezing, spat histamine was conducted. The prosecu- 31 - Chicken Pox & Shingles up, and stopped breathing, but he did tors suspected both parents, but 33 - Newsclips not cause his son’s death: he was trying Francine Yurko refused to implicate to resuscitate him.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Life Expo 2016 Exhibitor List
    Search this website Expo Blog & Videos 2016 Exhibitors 2016 Speakers 2016 Showguide Special Features Show Hours Buy Tickets Whole Life Expo 2016 Exhibitor List Directions to Convention Centre Over 200 dynamic exhibits feature the latest in natural health and green living products, services and research. Find out what's new for your mind, body and soul. Public Transit SPONSORS EDUCATION, ASSOCIATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS Accessibility GREEN LIVING RESOURCES HEALTH SERVICES, CENTRES, TREATMENTS Contact Us HEALTH PRODUCTS, APPLIANCES, TOOLS ANTI-AGING, SKIN & BODY CARE, AROMATHERAPY Previous Years WHOLE FOODS & ORGANIC MARKET Speakers/Exhibitors COUNSELLING, PERSONAL GROWTH & HEALTHY CUISINES, JUICES, SNACKS AND RETREATS Home GOURMET ITEMS HEALING JEWELLERY & STONES, CRAFTS, ECO- VITAMINS, HERBS, TONICS AND SUPPLEMENTS CLOTHING HEALTHY PET RESOURCES BOOKS, MAGAZINES, MUSIC, MEDIA SPONSORS CANADIAN HEALTH FOOD ASSOCIATION Booth 233 Food Lounge Sponsor www.chfa.ca VITALITY MAGAZINE Booth 60 The Trusted Source for Natural Health Solutions www.vitalitymagazine.com Back to top HEALTH PRODUCTS, APPLIANCES, TOOLS AQUASMART TECHNOLOGIES INC Booth 4 Water Purification Systems AROMAFRESH Booth 140 Ecological Air-Freshener; Hyper-allergenic Odour Neutralizer BIOTRONIX RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS Booth 44 Oxygen Portable Sauna; Gold and Silver Products; Bio Plasmic Generators; Laser; Food Zappers and Testers CENTURION Booth 26,27 Innovative Medical Equipment for Humans and Animals; PEMF; Laser Therapy DORMIO ORGANIC BEDS Booth 50, 51 Organic Mattresses EPHRA KAY
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Public Health's Strategy to Address Vaccine Hesitancy
    HL9.2.59 From: Miller, Christine To: Board of Health Subject: Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit Comments for 2019.HL9.2 on September 23, 2019 Board of Health Date: September 20, 2019 4:16:32 PM Attachments: image001.png image007.png image008.png image009.png Scoping Review_Vaccine Injury Compensation_Dec2017.pdf Sent on behalf of Dr. Charles Gardner, Medical Officer of Health for the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit To the City Clerk: Please add my comments to the agenda for the September 23, 2019 Board of Health meeting on item 2019.HL9.2, Moving to Acceptance: Toronto Public Health's Strategy to Address Vaccine Hesitancy I understand that my comments and the personal information in this email will form part of the public record and that my name will be listed as a correspondent on agendas and minutes of City Council or its committees. Also, I understand that agendas and minutes are posted online and my name may be indexed by search engines like Google. Comments: In 2017, the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit completed a comprehensive review on the subject of Vaccine Injury Compensation. The review was titled “A Scoping Review on Vaccine- Injury Compensation: Understanding Canadian Immunization Policy” (attached) and the purpose of this paper was to document information on the current dialogue on vaccine-injury compensation, in addition to an exploration of how and why this issue is relevant to supporting current and future immunization efforts in Canada. We ascertained the following key points through our review: · Vaccine Injury Compensation (VIC) dialogues has ebbed and flowed since the early 1980s, and continues to linger across the provinces/territories, which includes public advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Scientific Perspectives on the Health of Canada's First
    HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVES ON THE HEALTH OF CANADA‟S FIRST PEOPLES March, 2007 Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. About the Author: Raymond Obomsawin, is of Oneida and Abenaki ancestry. He is a member of the Odanak First Nation based in eastern Canada. The name Obomsawin is derived from the word nobomsawino which means to scout ahead and clear the way. He has previously served as: founding Chairman of the NIB/AFN‟s National Commission Inquiry on Indian Health (Ottawa, Ontario); Executive Director of the California Rural Indian Health Board (Ukiah Programme); Manager of Overseas Operations for CUSO, (Canada's largest international development NGO); and Senior Advisor on Indigenous Knowledge Systems to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). In the early 1990s he successfully organized and spearheaded the first public sector funded field review on Indigenous culture-based knowledge systems in development, covering all developing regions of the world. He can be contacted at: [email protected] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction SECTION I. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………........................... 1 1.1 THE FORGOTTEN LEGACY OF CANADA’S FIRST PEOPLES………………….…..…. 2 1.2 LOSS OF THE GREAT LEGACY OF HEALTH…………………………..……..…...….. 7 1.3 THE POPULARIZED CONCEPT OF “VIRGIN SOILS” RECONSIDERED…………..…… 9 1.4 TWENTIETH & TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY HEALTH CONDITIONS…………..……... 12 1.5 TRADITIONAL FOODS, HEALTH & DISEASE AMONG THE INUIT………………..….. 13 1.6 BACKGROUND ON AND HEALTH CONDITIONS AMONG THE MÉTIS……………..…. 15 1.7 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF MEDICAL SERVICES TO CANADA’S FIRST PEOPLES…. 16 1.8 HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE MÉTIS…………………………………………………. 19 1.9 TRANSFER OF PUBLIC SECTOR HEALTH SERVICES TO ABORIGINAL CONTROL…… 21 1.10 INTERMINABLE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES….
    [Show full text]
  • New Parent Guide
    New Parent Guide Developed by Your Child Your Future Your Choice Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents 02 2. Dear New Parent 03 3. Who Is Vaccine Choice Canada? 04 4. Protecting Your Baby’s Health 05 5. Vaccines – Are They Safe? 06 6. Facts You May Not Know 07 7. A Long Term Perspective 08 8. 14 Frequently Asked Questions 09 9. Cause For Concern 15 10. Dear Vaccine Advocate 18 11. The First Two Years of Life 20 12. Breastfeeding – The Living Immune System 26 13. How to Minimize the Risk of Vaccine Damage 28 14. Books, DVDs & Resources 29 15. Recommended Vaccine Schedule (BC) 31 16. Vaccine Choice Canada Membership 32 Special thanks to Vaccine Choice Canada member, Ted Kuntz, for his volunteer work in developing and producing this guide. 2 New Parent Guide Dear New Parent Congratulations on the creation of new life! This is an exciting and wonderful time. We wish you well on your journey of parenthood. We trust you have come to this information because of your desire to know more and to make the best possible choice for the health of your new born child. We commend you on your commitment to making an informed decision and on your willingness to fully embrace the responsibility of parenthood. We believe the decision of whether to vaccinate your new born child is one of the most difficult decisions you will be asked to make as a parent. We wish this decision wasn’t so difficult. Unfortunately it is. The politicized nature of the vaccine debate and the lack of balanced reporting in the media make it difficult for parents to have access to sufficient information to make an informed choice.
    [Show full text]
  • CBC Complaint – Lack of Journalistic Integrity 1
    May 29, 2018 CBC Ombudsman P.O. Box 500 Station A Toronto, Ontario M5W 1E6 To the Attention of: Esther Enkins, CBC Ombudsman ([email protected]) Dear Ms. Enkins, I’m writing to register another formal complaint about the lack of journalistic integrity, accuracy, and honesty by the Canadian Broadcast Corporation. Specifically, I wish to bring to your attention the May 24, 2018 article written by CBC journalist Ms. Bethany Lindsay - Complaints leveled at B.C. naturopaths offering 'complete elimination' of autism. (https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4675461) The CBC consistently reports on homeopathy in a manner that disregards their own stated commitment to act responsibly, to be accountable, and to strive for accuracy, fairness, balance, impartiality and integrity. This article is similar to many other articles by the CBC on homeopathy. The consistency in their manner of reporting indicates a more systemic problem at the CBC. The CBC persists in inviting the opinions of individuals who have no working knowledge, research knowledge, or expertise in the area of homeopathy. Inviting Inexpert Opinions Pat Mirenda is a professor of educational and counseling psychology and special education. My research on Ms. Mirenda provides no indication that Ms. Mirenda is knowledgeable or qualified to provide a professional opinion on the effectiveness of homeopathy. It appears that Ms. Mirenda’s opinion that CEASE therapy is “totally bogus” or that "None of that is true, none of that is evidence-based" is not based on sound evidence-based research and is purely the opinion of a professor of educational and counseling psychology. Similarly, Vancouver pediatrician Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Parents' Questions Regarding Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, and Thimerosal in Vaccines
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Student Works 2021-08-09 Responding to Parents' Questions Regarding Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, and Thimerosal in Vaccines Elli Hugh [email protected] Beth Luthy Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub Part of the Nursing Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hugh, Elli and Luthy, Beth, "Responding to Parents' Questions Regarding Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, and Thimerosal in Vaccines" (2021). Student Works. 323. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub/323 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Works by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Responding to Parents’ Questions Regarding Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, and Thimerosal in Vaccines Elli Hugh A scholarly paper submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Karlen E. (Beth) Luthy, Chair College of Nursing Brigham Young University Copyright © 2021 Elli Hugh All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Responding to Parents’ Questions Regarding Polysorbate 80, Aluminum, and Thimerosal in Vaccines Elli Hugh College of Nursing, BYU Master of Science Vaccines save millions of lives worldwide every year. Nevertheless, misinformation regarding vaccine ingredients circulates on various media platforms and may negatively influence parental decisions regarding childhood vaccinations. Three vaccine ingredients commonly associated with parental vaccine concerns include polysorbate 80, aluminum, and thimerosal. Common misconceptions about polysorbate 80 and neurological sequela exist within the vaccine hesitant community. Additionally, aluminum has been incorrectly connected to chronic disease in children.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Journal Fall Winter.Indd
    the Vaccine Choice Journal Fall/Winter 2017 Volume 4, No. 2 An Interview with Richard Moskowitz, MD Author of Vaccines: A Reappraisal Anne Dachel at Age of Autism in conversation with Dr. Moskowitz It was my privilege to question Dr. Moskowitz, author of a midwife, helping her to do what her body was already trying Vaccines: A Reappraisal about his position on the vaccine to do. So I just sat down and paid attention like everybody else, debate, the health of children, and where this is all headed. and thank God, nothing went wrong; she taught me the whole His answers are fascinating. Moskowitz is a wise and course that day, without saying a word. That was the first time I courageous doctor who has spent decades opposing the dictates had a vision of how I could practice medicine in a way I could of the pharma-controlled mainstream medical community. His be proud of. view of what makes us healthy is a That was how I became open to things refreshing change from what officials “What are doctors doing wrong like acupuncture and homeopathy. So tell us. today regarding children’s health?” to answer your question, what changed wasn’t the medical system or my views of it, but simply how I In your fifty years of practice, how have your views on could relate to it, to the point that I’ve also learned to appreciate modern medicine changed? the many good things it has to offer. For me, the big change was in medical school and during As a doctor of natural medicine, you have a different view internship.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Template
    WHY DO WE ARGUE ABOUT SCIENCE? EXPLORING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTECEDENTS OF REJECTION OF SCIENCE JOHN RICHARD KERR A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington for the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2020 Abstract Science is recognised and accepted as an important tool for understanding the world in which we live, yet some people hold beliefs that go against the best available scientific evidence. For example, many people believe human-caused climate change is not occurring, or that vaccines are ineffective and dangerous. Previous research has investigated a range of possible drivers of this ‘rejection of science’ (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013), including ignorance, distrust of scientists, and ideological motivations. The studies in this thesis extend this line of inquiry, focusing first on the role of perceptions of scientific agreement. I report experimental evidence that people base their beliefs on ‘what they think scientists think’ (Study 1). However, an analysis of longitudinal data (Study 2) suggests that our personal beliefs may also skew our perceptions of scientific agreement. While the results of Study 1 and Study 2 somewhat conflict, they do converge on one finding: perceptions of consensus alone do not fully explain rejection of science. In the remainder of the thesis I cast a wider net, examining how ideological beliefs are linked to rejection of science. Study 3 draws on social media data to reveal that political ideology is associated with rejection of science in the context of who people choose to follow on the platform Twitter. A final set of studies (4, 5, and 6) examine the role of two motivational antecedents of political ideology, Right-wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO), in rejection of science across five publicly debated issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry from Dr. Stephen Malthouse - Vaccine Choice Canada Page 5 of 17
    SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL Tuesday, October 20, 2020 @ 5:30 PM George Fraser Room, Ucluelet Community Centre, 500 Matterson Drive, Ucluelet LATE AGENDA Page 1. LATE ITEMS 1.1. Add "Open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry from Denman Island Doctor" as 3 - 17 Correspondence Item 7.2. 2020-10-17 Roussin Page 2 of 17 Page 3 of 17 Joseph Rotenberg From: Joseph Rotenberg Sent: October 19, 2020 9:30 AM To: Joseph Rotenberg Subject: RE: Open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry from Denman Island Doctor From: Angie Roussin Sent: October 17, 2020 9:50 AM To: Mayco Noël <[email protected]> Cc: Community Input Mailbox <[email protected]>; Info Ucluelet <[email protected]>; Subject: Open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry from Denman Island Doctor Hi Mayco, Below is a link to an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry from Stephen Malthouse, MD regarding the pandemic. I understand there is a council meeting on Tuesday and I’m wondering if this can be brought up? Specifically to make a point that there is no pandemic. https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/in-the-news/open-letter-to-dr-bonnie-henry-from-dr-stephen-malthouse/ Beyond this letter I have concerns that we are headed towards more severe lockdowns based only on propaganda and removal of individuals by force from their families to be sent to “internment camps”. I also have concerns about “forced compliance” of liability free vaccines that will surely cause enormous harm. I have mounds of evidence and am thinking of having an open house at my place to help share this info with people… not sure if that will do anything, I am kind of at a loss right now.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File
    page 12 page 8 page 26 • Hearing Test • TV Listening Devices • Hearing Aids • Ear Wax Management • Tinnitus Management • Tele-audiology • Hyperacusis • Curbside Services • Noise Protection • eStore FOR EVERYONE • Hearables • Specialized services HEARING HEALTH IN THE MOMENTS Join our mission to keep our community HearFIT! hearingexcellence.ca 416.601.0200 A Canadian small business servicing Canadians We're OPEN, but RESPONSIBLY BURLINGTON | OAKVILLE | WOODBRIDGE | TORONTO | SCARBOROUGH | WHITBY HELLO OAKVILLE! We're the new shop in town. Visit us at 6 Lakeshore Road W. for a complimentary product sample. Small-Batch Formulas, Skincare, Essential Oils, Mens & Baby Care, Gifting, Refills. Home of the Lemon Aide cleaning collection. MAISONAPOTHECARE.CA “As 昀rst time sellers & our 昀rst time buying a ‘lived in’ home, we could not have asked for a better experience with Anita & Matt! They were thorough & took the time to go through every detail with us. We felt so comfortable & safe throughout the entire process - while also having a bunch of fun house hunting - even during a pandemic! We are so happy with how everything turned out... we got over asking for our home & also feel we got a great deal negotiated on the new house. We seriously could not have asked for anything more. We would not hesitate one bit to work with Anita & Matt again or recommend them to any friends & family.” - Cheryl & Derick R. Matt Sullivan Anita Sullivan Sales Representative Broker cell 905-580-9196 cell 905-466-4900 of昀ce 905-338-3737 of昀ce 905-338-3737 [email protected] [email protected] sullivanrealestate.ca sullivanrealestate.ca • Seniors Real Estate Specialist • Accredited Buyer’s Representative Royal LePage Real Estate SULLIVAN • Certi昀ed Negotiation Expert Services Ltd., Brokerage REAL ESTATE BEST BROKER The Publishers Message The censorship that is happening today is beyond Bronte Villager frightening and it seems to be getting worse every day.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the Standing Committee on Law Amendments for the Session
    FIRST REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AMENDMENTS Third Session 59th Legislative Assembly of the Province of New Brunswick November 20, 2019 MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Hon. Ms. Anderson-Mason, Q.C., Chair Mr. Landry Mr. Northrup, Vice-Chair Ms. Landry Hon. Mr. Stewart Mr. McKee Mr. Fitch Ms. Mitton Mr. K. Chiasson Mr. DeSaulniers November 20, 2019 To The Honourable The Legislative Assembly of The Province of New Brunswick Mr. Speaker: I have the pleasure to present herewith the First Report of the Standing Committee on Law Amendments for the session. The report is the result of your Committee’s deliberations on Bill 39, An Act Respecting Proof of Immunization. On behalf of the Committee, I wish to thank those individuals and organizations who appeared before the Committee or provided written submissions. In addition, I would like to express my appreciation to the members of the Committee for their contribution in carrying out our mandate. Your Committee begs leave to make a further report. Respectfully submitted, Hon. Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C., MLA Chair of the Standing Committee on Law Amendments November 20, 2019 To The Honourable The Legislative Assembly of The Province of New Brunswick Mr. Speaker: Your Standing Committee on Law Amendments begs leave to submit their First Report of the session. On June 7, 2019, Bill 39, An Act Respecting Proof of Immunization, was introduced in the Legislative Assembly by the Honourable Dominic Cardy, Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development. The purpose of Bill 39 is to remove non-medical exemptions from the mandatory immunization requirements for public school and licensed early learning and child care admissions.
    [Show full text]