Biologia 63/6: 799—805, 2008 Section Botany DOI: 10.2478/s11756-008-0101-4
Siderocelis irregularis (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae) in Lake Tanganyika (Africa)*
Maya P. Stoyneva1, Elisabeth Ingolič2,WernerKofler3 &WimVyverman4
1Sofia University ‘St Kliment Ohridski’, Faculty of Biology, Department of Botany, 8 bld. Dragan Zankov, BG-1164 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]fia.bg 2Graz University of Technology, Research Institute for Electron Microscopy, Steyrergasse 17,A-8010 Graz, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] 3University of Innsbruck, Institute of Botany, Sternwartestrasse 15,A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; e-mail: werner.kofl[email protected] 4Ghent University, Department Biology, Laboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Krijgslaan 281-S8,B-9000 Gent, Belgium; e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Siderocelis irregularis Hindák, representing a genus Siderocelis (Naumann) Fott that is known from European temperate waters, was identified as a common phytoplankter in Lake Tanganyika. It was found aposymbiotic as well as ingested (possibly endosymbiotic) in lake heterotrophs, mainly Strombidium sp. and Vorticella spp. The morphology and ultrastructure of the species, studied with LM, SEM and TEM, are described with emphasis on the structure of the cell wall and the pyrenoid. Key words: Chlorophyta; cell wall; pyrenoid; symbiosis; ciliates; Strombidium; Vorticella
Introduction ics of symbiotic species in general came into alignment with that of free-living algae and the term ‘zoochlorel- Tight partnerships between algae and aquatic inver- lae’ was abandoned as being taxonomically ambiguous tebrates, including symbiotic relationships, have long (e.g. Bal 1968; Reisser & Wiessner 1984; Taylor 1984; been of interest and a number of excellent reviews are Reisser 1992a). It was proposed to replace this obsolete available. In the context of modern biology, Reisser notion by the prefix ‘symbiotic’, and the exact species or (1992b, p. xii) defined ‘symbiosis’ as the ‘living together genus designation or, in cases of uncertainty, by ‘sym- in physical contact of organisms of different species’, biotic green alga’ (Reisser 1984; Reisser & Widowski while the interaction between heterotrophic cells and 1992). The terms ‘endosymbiotic’ and ‘endosymbiont’ ‘symbiotic’ chloroplasts derived from ingested algae was were further clarified by Reisser (1992a, p. 2) to be used mentioned by him as “twilight-zones” of symbiosis in- in a general sense as ‘living within genetically different cluded there by tradition. organism... which will be called “host” without any Many symbiotic genera and species appear closely implications as to mutual harm or benefit. related to, or fall within, recognized free-living assem- Heterotrophic hosts seem to be very fastidious blages. However, by strong contrast with the free-living in choosing a potential autotrophic partner. Although (aposymbiotic) algae the descriptions of most of the the freshwater habitat offers a plethora of diverse symbiotic forms are still quite rudimentary and often cyanoprokaryotes and algae, they pick up exclusively contradictory (Reisser 1984). Following the studies of asexual green coccoid species (Reisser 1986). Due to Brandt (1882) the most commonly applied term to their simple morphology, classification by light mi- the green autotrophic partners was ‘zoochlorellae’. This croscopy alone is not easy. It has commonly been stated term, without any taxonomic value and arbitrarily ex- that the predominant symbiotic algal partners of fresh- tended to every green algal cell that lives in associa- water associations belong to the genus Chlorella (with tion with a heterotrophic organism, was characteristic some preference to the Chlorella vulgaris-sorokiniana of the confused state of knowledge on symbiotic forms cluster) and its representatives do not differ principally (Reisser 1984). After many discussions on whether exis- by morphology or cytology from free-living chlorellae, tence in a symbiotic association was a sufficient reason but are distinguished from them mainly by physiolog- to place these organisms in separate taxa, the systemat- ical characteristics (Reisser & Widowski 1992). More
* Presented at the International Symposium Biology and Taxonomy of Green Algae V, Smolenice, June 26–29, 2007, Slovakia.