DOCSLIB.ORG

HIST-744.01 the Historian's Craft Fall 2008 Richard Breitman Class

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HIST-744.01 the Historian's Craft Fall 2008 Richard Breitman Class HIST-744.01 The Historian’s Craft Fall 2008 Richard Breitman Class Meetings: Office: Battelle-Tomkins 119 Wed 5:30-8 p.m. Tel: 885-2407 Office hours: M Th 1-3, W 2-4 [email protected] Subject and Methods Almost anything can be a part of history. But what makes history a field or discipline different than sociology, political science, or literature? How does a historian choose a suitable subject and treat it appropriately? What are the various branches or types of history apart from divisions by chronology and geography? This course is designed to grapple with these questions, to allow you to draw some conclusions, and to gain some sense of what the field of history is like today. We will begin with some very well-known works by non-historians writing history as they saw it. What, if anything, do they have in common? We will then examine works by some historians writing about themselves and their discipline. We will read some historical monographs about different areas of the field (e.g., political history, social history, cultural history). Toward the end of the semester we will: investigate some methodological issues raised recently within and outside history; discuss some popular areas, themes, and concepts; and examine some examples of controversies within the profession. By the end of the semester you should have a clearer sense of the field of history, whether you intend to write it, teach it, apply it, or make it. It will not happen, however, unless you make it happen. I will lead discussions and take part in them, but this is not a lecture course. You need to do the very substantial reading punctually, think about it, and speak frequently in class. Each week there is some required reading for the entire class. In addition, you must also select and read one supplementary reading every other week. At our first meeting we will divide the class so that each week there is one portion of the class doing supplementary reading. Each time you do supplementary reading, you should come to class prepared to discuss the author’s coverage and interpretation. You will be reporting to others most of whom have not read the same book. Each time you read a supplementary work, you should expect to give a brief summary of it to the class. Active participation in class is required and will count for 30% of your final grade. Quality of participation in discussions is obviously more important than quantity of participation, but it will not do to learn a couple of subjects very well and to keep quiet the rest of the semester. Do not just absorb and accept what is written–you need to think critically about the readings. If you do, you should want to participate. Sometimes asking the right questions is more important than trying to provide the right answers. I have ordered the required reading books at the bookstore. You may have to scramble to 1 get some of the supplementary works you will select, so try to plan ahead. Although the reading load is quite heavy, the written work is not. There are no exams. The course has three papers of varying lengths. The first paper is a short (five-page, double- spaced) one due on September 24. In this paper you must select a work of history that influenced you significantly. Perhaps it helped influence you to do graduate work in history, or perhaps it was the first work you read that made you think about majoring in history in college. Summarize the author’s findings, interpretation, and general approach. Then discuss how this work does or does not fit the mold of historical writing covered in the reading of Topics II and III below. This paper counts for 10% of your grade for the course. The second paper, approximately twelve pages, is due November 5. For this paper you must survey at least the last three years of a major historical journal. Discuss the range of topics covered there in articles and, if relevant, book reviews. Compare the topics, methodologies, and quality of research and writing in this journal with one of the class topics and reading assignments–normally the topic you think is most relevant to what you have found in this journal. This paper counts for 20% of your grade for the course. The third paper, approximately 20 pages, is due December 3. Select any one of the historical monographs listed on the syllabus (required or supplementary readings), except books you have already written about in previous papers. (Consult me if you have questions about what constitutes a monograph.) Read other works on the same subject or similar subjects, and compare the original selection with what you have found in other readings. You may wish to consider to what extent do historical interpretations change over time, according to new discoveries of sources, or trends in the discipline. This kind of paper is historiographical–you are expected to focus more on the historians’ treatment of a subject than on the events studied, although you may need to summarize what is covered. This paper counts for 40% of your grade for the course. Required Readings Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto, (Signet Classics, 1998, 0451527100) Marc Bloch, The Historian’s Craft (Vintage, 1964, 0394705122) Martha C. Howell, Walter Prevenier, From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods (Cornell, 2001, 0801485606) Richard Breitman, Official Secrets (Hill and Wang, 1998, 0809001845) Gary Nash, The Urban Crucible, abridged ed., (Harvard, 2006, 0674930592) Vanessa Schwartz, Spectacular Realities (University of California, 1999, 0520221680) Melvyn Leffler, For the Soul of Mankind: The United States, the Soviet Union and the Cold War (Hill and Wang, 2008, pb. 0374531420) Robert Proctor, Racial Hygiene (Harvard, 2003, 0674745787) Anna Clark, The Struggle for the Breeches (University of California, 1997, 0520208838) Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (Verso, 1991, 0860915468) Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 (Vintage, 1988, 0394741552) Ernst Breisach, On the Future of History: The Postmodernist Challenge and its Aftermath (Chicago, 2003, 0226072800). Joyce Appelby, et al., Telling the Truth about History (Norton, 1995, 0393312860) 2 Peter Charles Hoffer, Past Imperfect: Facts, Fictions, Frauds (Public Affairs, 2004, 1586482440) Schedule of class meetings, assignments, readings Aug. 27 Introductions, Discussion of syllabus, assignments Sept. 3 Topic I below Sept.10 Topic II below Sept.17 Topic III below Sept. 24 Topic IV below 1st paper due Oct. 1 Topic V below Oct. 8 Topic VI below Oct. 15 Topic VII below Oct. 22 Topic VIII below Oct. 29 Topic IX below Nov. 5 Topic X below 2nd paper due Nov. 12 Topic XI below Nov. 19 Topic XII below Nov. 26 No class per university calendar Dec. 3 Topic XIII below 3rd paper due Dec. 10 Topic XIV below (class meets because no final exam) I. Sept. 3: Classic Works by Non-Historians Required: Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto. Supplementary (choose one) Sigmund Freud, Civilization and its Discontents Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, Democracy Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation Erik H. Erikson, Young Man Luther Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Ralf Dahrendorf, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society II. Sept. 10: History as a craft Required: Marc Bloch, The Historian’s Craft Supplementary E. H. Carr, What is History Eric Hobsbawm, On History J. H. Plumb, The Making of a Historian Thomas Haskell, Objectivity is Not Neutrality Forrest McDonald, Recovering the Past: A Historian’s Memoir John Lewis Gaddis, The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past 3 III. Sept. 17: Evidence, Hypotheses, and Form Required: Martha C. Howell, Walter Prevenier, From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods Supplementary James West Davidson and Mark Lytle, After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, vols. 1 and 2. (one per person) Anthony Grafton, The Footnote: A Curious History Robin Winks, The Historian as Detective David Hackett Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies Natalie Zemon Davis, Fiction in the Archives Charles Tilly, As Sociology Meets History IV. Sept. 24: Examples of Political History (Pam Nadell presiding) Required: Richard Breitman, Official Secrets Supplementary: Roger H. Brown, Redeeming the Republic David Holloway, Stalin and the Bomb Jeffrey Herf, Divided Memory Allan J. Lichtman, Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 Jack Rakove, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. Saul Friedlander, Nazi Germany and the Jews V. Oct. 1: Examples of Social History Required: Gary Nash, The Urban Crucible: The Northern Seaports and the Origins of the American Revolution, abridged ed., (Harvard, 2006). Supplementary: James F. Brooks, Captives and Cousins: Slavery, Kinship, and Community in the Southwest Borderlands Harold Perkin, The Origins of Modern English Society. Fritz Ringer, Decline of the German Mandarins Mack Walker, German Home Towns. Marion Kaplan, Between Dignity and Despair: Jewish Life in Nazi Germany William H. Sewell, Work and Revolution in France Michael Kazin, Barons of Labor Paul Johnson, Shopkeepers’ Millennium VI. Oct. 8: Examples of Cultural History Required; Vanessa Schwartz, Spectacular Realities. Supplementary: Paul Boyer, By the Bomb’s Early Light 4 Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre. Victoria de Grazia, Irresistible Empire: America’s Advance through 20 th -Century Europe Lynn Hunt, Politics, Class, and Culture in the French Revolution Jackson Lears, Fables of Abundance: A History of American Advertising. Jonathan Schneer, London 1900: The Imperial Metropolis Stephen J. Whitfield, The Culture of the Cold War VII. Oct. 15: Examples of Diplomatic and Military History Required: Melvyn Leffler, For the Soul of Mankind: The United States, the Soviet Union and the Cold War Supplementary: John Lewis Gaddis, We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History Gary Bass, Stay the Hand of Vengeance Niall Ferguson, The Pity of War xix-247, 339-462.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book Spring 2006.Qxd
    Anthony Grafton History’s postmodern fates Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/135/2/54/1829123/daed.2006.135.2.54.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 As the twenty-½rst century begins, his- in the mid-1980s to almost one thousand tory occupies a unique, but not an envi- now. But the vision of a rise in the num- able, position among the humanistic dis- ber of tenure-track jobs that William ciplines in the United States. Every time Bowen and others evoked, and that lured Clio examines her reflection in the mag- many young men and women into grad- ic mirror of public opinion, more voices uate school in the 1990s, has never mate- ring out, shouting that she is the ugliest rialized in history. The market, accord- Muse of all. High school students rate ingly, seems out of joint–almost as bad- history their most boring subject. Un- ly so as in the years around 1970, when dergraduates have fled the ½eld with production of Ph.D.s ½rst reached one the enthusiasm of rats leaving a sinking thousand or more per year just as univer- ship. Thirty years ago, some 5 percent sities and colleges went into economic of all undergraduates majored in histo- crisis. Many unemployed holders of doc- ry. Nowadays, around 2 percent do so. torates in history hold their teachers and Numbers of new Ph.D.s have risen, from universities responsible for years of op- a low of just under ½ve hundred per year pression, misery, and wasted effort that cannot be usefully reapplied in other careers.1 Anthony Grafton, a Fellow of the American Acad- Those who succeed in obtaining ten- emy since 2002, is Henry Putnam University Pro- ure-track positions, moreover, may still fessor of History at Princeton University and ½nd themselves walking a stony path.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History?
    Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History? Francesca Trivellato In the late 1970s and 80s, particularly after the appearance of Carlo Ginzburg’s The Cheese and the Worms (1976) and Giovanni Levi’s Inheriting Power (1985), Italian microhistory shook the ground of established historiographical paradigms and practices. Since then, as Anthony Grafton put it, “Microhistories have captivated readers, won places on syllabi, been translated into many languages – and enraged and delighted their [the authors’] fellow professionals” (2006, 62). Are the questions that propelled Italian microhistory still significant or have they lost impetus? How has the meaning of microhistory changed over the past thirty years? And what can this approach contribute nowadays, when ‘globalization’ and ‘global’ are the dominant keywords in the humanities and the social sciences – keywords that we hardly associate with anything micro? In what follows, I wish to put forth two arguments. I suggest that the potential of a microhistorical approach for global history remains underexploited. Since the 1980s, the encounter between Italian microhistory and global history has been confined primarily to the narrative form. A host of studies of individuals whose lives traversed multiple linguistic, political, and religious boundaries has enjoyed considerable success among scholars and the broad public alike. These are predicated on the idea that a micro- and biographical scale can best portray the entanglement of cultural traditions produced by the growing contacts and clashes between different societies that followed the sixteenth- century European geographical expansion. They also reflect a greater comfort among historians and the general reader, perhaps most pronounced in Anglophone countries, with narration rather than social scientific analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • William Herle's Report of the Dutch Situation, 1573
    LIVES AND LETTERS, VOL. 1, NO. 1, SPRING 2009 Signs of Intelligence: William Herle’s Report of the Dutch Situation, 1573 On the 11 June 1573 the agent William Herle sent his patron William Cecil, Lord Burghley a lengthy intelligence report of a ‘Discourse’ held with Prince William of Orange, Stadtholder of the Netherlands.∗ Running to fourteen folio manuscript pages, the Discourse records the substance of numerous conversations between Herle and Orange and details Orange’s efforts to persuade Queen Elizabeth to come to the aid of the Dutch against Spanish Habsburg imperial rule. The main thrust of the document exhorts Elizabeth to accept the sovereignty of the Low Countries in order to protect England’s naval interests and lead a league of protestant European rulers against Spain. This essay explores the circumstances surrounding the occasion of the Discourse and the context of the text within Herle’s larger corpus of correspondence. In the process, I will consider the methods by which the study of the material features of manuscripts can lead to a wider consideration of early modern political, secretarial and archival practices. THE CONTEXT By the spring of 1573 the insurrection in the Netherlands against Spanish rule was seven years old. Elizabeth had withdrawn her covert support for the English volunteers aiding the Dutch rebels, and was busy entertaining thoughts of marriage with Henri, Duc d’Alençon, brother to the King of France. Rejecting the idea of French assistance after the massacre of protestants on St Bartholomew’s day in Paris the previous year, William of Orange was considering approaching the protestant rulers of Europe, mostly German Lutheran sovereigns, to form a strong alliance against Spanish Catholic hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • John R. Mcneill University Professor Georgetown University President of the American Historical Association, 2019 Presidential Address
    2020-President_Address.indd All Pages 14/10/19 7:31 PM John R. McNeill University Professor Georgetown University President of the American Historical Association, 2019 Presidential Address New York Hilton Trianon Ballroom New York, New York Saturday, January 4, 2020 5:30 PM John R. McNeill By George Vrtis, Carleton College In fall 1998, John McNeill addressed the Georgetown University community to help launch the university’s new capital campaign. Sharing the stage with Georgetown’s president and other dignitaries, McNeill focused his comments on the two “great things” he saw going on at Georgetown and why each merited further support. One of those focal points was teaching and the need to constantly find creative new ways to inspire, share knowledge, and build intellectual community among faculty and students. The other one centered on scholarship. Here McNeill suggested that scholars needed to move beyond the traditional confines of academic disciplines laid down in the 19th century, and engage in more innovative, imaginative, and interdisciplinary research. Our intellectual paths have been very fruitful for a long time now, McNeill observed, but diminishing returns have set in, information and methodologies have exploded, and new roads beckon. To help make his point, McNeill likened contemporary scholars to a drunk person searching for his lost keys under a lamppost, “not because he lost them there but because that is where the light is.” The drunk-swirling-around-the-lamppost metaphor was classic McNeill. Throughout his academic life, McNeill has always conveyed his ideas in clear, accessible, often memorable, and occasionally humorous language. And he has always ventured into the darkness, searchlight in hand, helping us to see and understand the world and ourselves ever more clearly with each passing year.
    [Show full text]
  • Books Added to Benner Library from Estate of Dr. William Foote
    Books added to Benner Library from estate of Dr. William Foote # CALL NUMBER TITLE Scribes and scholars : a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature / by L.D. Reynolds and N.G. 1 001.2 R335s, 1991 Wilson. 2 001.2 Se15e Emerson on the scholar / Merton M. Sealts, Jr. 3 001.3 R921f Future without a past : the humanities in a technological society / John Paul Russo. 4 001.30711 G163a Academic instincts / Marjorie Garber. Book of the book : some works & projections about the book & writing / edited by Jerome Rothenberg and 5 002 B644r Steven Clay. 6 002 OL5s Smithsonian book of books / Michael Olmert. 7 002 T361g Great books and book collectors / Alan G. Thomas. 8 002.075 B29g Gentle madness : bibliophiles, bibliomanes, and the eternal passion for books / Nicholas A. Basbanes. 9 002.09 B29p Patience & fortitude : a roving chronicle of book people, book places, and book culture / Nicholas A. Basbanes. Books of the brave : being an account of books and of men in the Spanish Conquest and settlement of the 10 002.098 L552b sixteenth-century New World / Irving A. Leonard ; with a new introduction by Rolena Adorno. 11 020.973 R824f Foundations of library and information science / Richard E. Rubin. 12 021.009 J631h, 1976 History of libraries in the Western World / by Elmer D. Johnson and Michael H. Harris. 13 025.2832 B175d Double fold : libraries and the assault on paper / Nicholson Baker. London booksellers and American customers : transatlantic literary community and the Charleston Library 14 027.2 R196L Society, 1748-1811 / James Raven.
    [Show full text]
  • Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholars 1956-57- 2016-2017 (61 Years)
    Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholars 1956-57- 2016-2017 (61 years) 2016-2017 (112 visits) Adorno, Rolena Spanish/Latin American literatur Yale Bialek, William physics Princeton Ehrman, Bart D. religion, New Testament UNC-Chapel Hill Grosz, Barbara J. computer science Harvard Hochschild, Jennifer L. political science Harvard Kitcher, Philip philosophy Columbia Lester, Marsha I. chemistry Penn Morse, Nora Naranjo fine arts, poetry, sculpture Espanola, NM Rodgers, Daniel T. American history & culture Princeton Sabloff, Jeremy A. anthropology, Maya Penn Weiman, David F. economic history Barnard Wexler, Laura American studies Yale Witt, John Fabian law, American history Yale Wright, Patricia anthropology/primatology SUNY, Stony Brook Xiao, Shuhai geobiology/paleobiology Virginia Tech 2015-2016 (100 visits) Michael Bérubé English, disability studies Penn State Caroline Bruzelius art, art history Duke David K. Campbell physics, engineering Boston U. Hazel V. Carby African American studies Yale Carol Greenhouse anthropology, sociocultural Princeton David B. Grusky sociology, inequality, poverty Stanford Rigoberto Hernandez biochemistry, diversity studies Georgia Tech Mae Ngai history, Asian American studies Columbia Judith Resnik law Yale Timothy Rowe paleontology, geology UTAustin Larry A. Silver art history, Renaissance Penn Harold W. Stanley political science, elections Southern Methodist Richard Sylla American economic history NYU Blaire Van Valkenburgh vertebrate paleonbiology UCLA Vincent L. Wimbush religion Inst.SignifyingScriptures 2014-2015 (96 visits) Jeffrey C. Alexander sociology Yale William Y. Arms computer science Cornell Wendy Brown political science UCBerkeley Caroline Bruzelius art, art history Duke Philip J. Deloria history, American Indian Michigan Gerald Graff English, education Illinois at Chicago Kathleen McGarry economics, aging UCLA Gregory A. Petsko neurology, neuroscience Cornell Med.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. Darnton Shelby Cullom Davis ‘30 Professor of European History Princeton University
    Robert C. Darnton Shelby Cullom Davis ‘30 Professor of European History Princeton University President 1999 LIJ r t i Robert C. Darnton The French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu once remarked that Robert Damton’s principal shortcoming as a scholar is that he “writes too well.” This prodigious talent, which arouses such suspicion of aristocratic pretension among social scientists in republican France, has made him nothing less than an academic folk hero in America—one who is read with equal enthusiasm and pleasure by scholars and the public at large. Darnton’ s work improbably blends a strong dose of Cartesian rationalism with healthy portions of Dickensian grit and sentiment. The result is a uniquely American synthesis of the finest traits of our British and French ancestors—a vision of the past that is at once intellectually bracing and captivatingly intimate. fascination with the making of modem Western democracies came easily to this true blue Yankee. Born in New York City on the eve of the Second World War, the son of two reporters at the New York Times, Robert Damton has always had an immediate grasp of what it means to be caught up in the fray of modem world historical events. The connection between global historical forces and the tangible lives of individuals was driven home at a early age by his father’s death in the Pacific theater during the war. Irreparable loss left him with a deep commitment to recover the experiences of people in the past. At Phillips Academy and Harvard College, his first interest was in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • AHA Colloquium
    Cover.indd 1 13/10/20 12:51 AM Thank you to our generous sponsors: Platinum Gold Bronze Cover2.indd 1 19/10/20 9:42 PM 2021 Annual Meeting Program Program Editorial Staff Debbie Ann Doyle, Editor and Meetings Manager With assistance from Victor Medina Del Toro, Liz Townsend, and Laura Ansley Program Book 2021_FM.indd 1 26/10/20 8:59 PM 400 A Street SE Washington, DC 20003-3889 202-544-2422 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.historians.org Perspectives: historians.org/perspectives Facebook: facebook.com/AHAhistorians Twitter: @AHAHistorians 2020 Elected Officers President: Mary Lindemann, University of Miami Past President: John R. McNeill, Georgetown University President-elect: Jacqueline Jones, University of Texas at Austin Vice President, Professional Division: Rita Chin, University of Michigan (2023) Vice President, Research Division: Sophia Rosenfeld, University of Pennsylvania (2021) Vice President, Teaching Division: Laura McEnaney, Whittier College (2022) 2020 Elected Councilors Research Division: Melissa Bokovoy, University of New Mexico (2021) Christopher R. Boyer, Northern Arizona University (2022) Sara Georgini, Massachusetts Historical Society (2023) Teaching Division: Craig Perrier, Fairfax County Public Schools Mary Lindemann (2021) Professor of History Alexandra Hui, Mississippi State University (2022) University of Miami Shannon Bontrager, Georgia Highlands College (2023) President of the American Historical Association Professional Division: Mary Elliott, Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture (2021) Nerina Rustomji, St. John’s University (2022) Reginald K. Ellis, Florida A&M University (2023) At Large: Sarah Mellors, Missouri State University (2021) 2020 Appointed Officers Executive Director: James Grossman AHR Editor: Alex Lichtenstein, Indiana University, Bloomington Treasurer: William F.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus, 21H.991J / STS.210J Theories and Methods in the Study
    Fall 2010 Instructor: Jeff Ravel T 10-1 STS 210J/21H.991J: Theories and Methods in the Study of History Overview We will doggedly ask two questions in this class: “What is history?” and “How do you do it in 2010?” In pursuit of the answers, we will survey a variety of approaches to the past used by historians writing in the last several decades. We will examine how these historians conceive of their object of study, how they use primary sources as a basis for their accounts, how they structure the narrative and analytical discussion of their topic, and the advantages and limitations of their approaches. One concern is the evolution of historical studies in the western tradition, which is not to say that the western approach is the only valid one, nor is it to suggest that we will only read histories of the west. But MIT and many of the institutions in which you will work during your careers are firmly rooted in western intellectual paradigms, and the study of times and places far removed from the western past has been deeply influenced by western historical assumptions. (And, to be honest, this is the historical tradition with which I am most familiar!) We will begin with a brief overview of the construction and deconstruction of historical thinking in the west from the beginnings of Christianity to the present. Then we will consider questions of scale, a major preoccupation of post-WWII historians. In the second half of the twentieth century and the start of the twenty-first, history has been written at the national, global, and micro level.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Summer 2006.Qxd
    Letters to the Editor of Dædalus On history in the twentieth The geographical expansion of histo- ry brought most of the world into his- century Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/daed/article-pdf/135/3/123/1829121/daed.2006.135.3.123.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 tory courses. It also created new views May 10, 2006 of world and comparative history. World historians like William McNeill, Leftan Stavrianos, and Marshall Hodgson To the Editor: brought differing novel approaches to Anthony Grafton’s essay, “History’s many aspects of world history, a growing postmodern fates,” in the Spring 2006 ½eld that challenged the privileging of issue of Dædalus was interesting and in- the West over the rest that characterized formative, but I share neither his pessi- earlier writings and theories regarding mism about the fate of history nor his global history. Elements of Marxism limited view of important twentieth- were important in post–World War II century developments. In summarizing schools founded by social scientists but other trends among historians in the adopted by many historians–Depen- United States, I will also focus on the dency Theory, which originated in Lat- post–World War II period. More works in America, and World Systems Theory, deserve mention if readers are to avoid a which was begun by Immanuel Waller- restricted view of history in this period. stein and divided the modern world into Grafton covers major works by micro- a changing core, a semi-periphery, and historians, especially Carlo Ginzburg, a periphery, with the former exploiting Natalie Davis, and Robert Darnton, and the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Spring 2006.Qxd
    Anthony Grafton History’s postmodern fates As the twenty-½rst century begins, his- in the mid-1980s to almost one thousand tory occupies a unique, but not an envi- now. But the vision of a rise in the num- able, position among the humanistic dis- ber of tenure-track jobs that William ciplines in the United States. Every time Bowen and others evoked, and that lured Clio examines her reflection in the mag- many young men and women into grad- ic mirror of public opinion, more voices uate school in the 1990s, has never mate- ring out, shouting that she is the ugliest rialized in history. The market, accord- Muse of all. High school students rate ingly, seems out of joint–almost as bad- history their most boring subject. Un- ly so as in the years around 1970, when dergraduates have fled the ½eld with production of Ph.D.s ½rst reached one the enthusiasm of rats leaving a sinking thousand or more per year just as univer- ship. Thirty years ago, some 5 percent sities and colleges went into economic of all undergraduates majored in histo- crisis. Many unemployed holders of doc- ry. Nowadays, around 2 percent do so. torates in history hold their teachers and Numbers of new Ph.D.s have risen, from universities responsible for years of op- a low of just under ½ve hundred per year pression, misery, and wasted effort that cannot be usefully reapplied in other careers.1 Anthony Grafton, a Fellow of the American Acad- Those who succeed in obtaining ten- emy since 2002, is Henry Putnam University Pro- ure-track positions, moreover, may still fessor of History at Princeton University and ½nd themselves walking a stony path.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Statement Sample #1 Mystics, Feminists, and Anne Boleyn: My Journey Through History
    Personal Statement Sample #1 Mystics, Feminists, and Anne Boleyn: My Journey Through History I arrived at Princeton thinking that I wanted to study Anne Boleyn and Elizabeth I. At that point, history existed for me as a dichotomy. On the one hand, it was mechanical memorization of right, rote answers from dry textbooks for AP exams. On the other, it was free- ranging, creative inquiry, as my AP European History teacher encouraged in papers. In my senior year of high school, I wrote three “history papers”: (1) an exploration of sameness versus difference feminism in the querelle des femmes; (2) a look at marriage and passion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë’s novels; and (3) an analysis of gender fluidity and essentialism in the writings of Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir. “History” was what I made of it. It had no disciplinary rules; it entailed literary, theatrical, artistic, and poetic investigation of questions that interested me, like “how menstruation has been used from Aristotle to the present to make arguments about women’s inferiority” (a paper idea recently re-discovered in a note on my phone from 2014). When I took the Humanities Sequence my first year at Princeton, I thrived in the interdisciplinary space it created, eagerly writing about breastfeeding in Plato’s Republic and prostitution in Herodotus. I took my first history departmental course in the spring, Margot Canaday’s brilliant Gender and Sexuality in Modern America. Only then did I begin to learn that history was not what I thought it was. I told my preceptor that for my final paper I wanted to analyze the poetry in Sinister Wisdom and Chrysalis through the lenses of Adrienne Rich’s “Compulsory Heterosexuality” and Gayle Rubin’s “Thinking Sex.” She gently informed me that my plan was essentially an English paper and advised me on how to make it historical.
    [Show full text]