DOCSLIB.ORG

English Miles Below Castillo Viejo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
English Miles Below Castillo Viejo INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISPUTE CONCERNING NAVIGATIONAL AND RELATED RIGHTS (COSTA RICA v NICARAGUA) COUNTER - MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA VOLUME I 29 May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................~.................................................................................... 1 SECTION1 THE PROCEDUREAND THE JURISDICTIONOF THE COURT........................................................... 1 SECTION2 THEHISTORY AND THE BACKGROUNDOF THE CASE.................................................................. 2 SECTION3 THESCOPE AND THE NATUREOF THE DISPUTE............... ................. .............................................6 SECTION4 THE STRUCTUREOF NICARAGUA'S &X!NI'ER-MEMORIAL .............................................................7 CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND TO THE DISPUTE .......................................................................................9 SECTION1.1 GEOGRAPHYOF THE SANJUAN UE NICARAGUARIVER ................................................................. 9 RESERVES................................................................................................................................ 14 SECTION1.2 THETREATY OF LIMITSOF 1858: HISTORICALBACKGROUND .................................................... 16 A . THESA NJUAN RIVER UNDER SPANISH RULE (1 52 7- 1821).................................................... 18 B . THEPOST-INDEPENDENCE AND FEDERAL PERIOD (1821- 1838) ...................................... 20 C. THEPOST-FEDERAL PERIOD (1838- 1848)............................................................................ 22 D . PERIQD OF INTERNA TIONALIZA TION OF THE DISPUTE .......................................................... 25 E . PERIODOF THE NATIONALANTI-FILIBUSTER WAR (1855-57) .............................................. 29 CONCLusiohrs ........................................................................................................................ 35 SECTION1.3 PRECEDENTSAND SUBSEQUENT PRACTICE RELATED TO TkIE 1858 JEREZ - CARASTREATY ....... 3g A . PRECEDENTS TO THE 1858 TREATY...................................................................................... 39 B . THETREA TI' OF LIMITSOF 15 APRIL1858 ...................... .. .............................................. 47 c. THEPERIOD FROM 1858 TO 1888 .......................................................................................50 D . PERIODSUBSEQUENT TO I888 ............................................................................................ 53 CHAPTER 2 NICARAGUA'S SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE SAN JUAN DE NICARAGUA RIVER ...... 61 SECT~ON2.1 CHARACTER.OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE 1858 TREATY......................................................... 61 E. COSTARICA 'S ALLEGED RIGttT TO THE RE-SUPPLY OFAND TRANSPORT OF Ij6'RSONNEL TO AND FROM BORDER POSTS AND "OTHER RLU TED RIGHE" ........................................................ 183 SECTION4.3 COSTA~CA PURPORTS A RIGHT OF NAVIGATION IN THE SANJUAN DE NICAKAGUARIVER THAT IS NOT GRANTED BY THE JEREZ- CANAS TREATYOR BY THE CLEVELANDAWARD ................. I83 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 194 CHAPTER 5 NICARAGUA HAS NOT BREACHED ANY OTHER RIGHTS ALLEGED BY COSTA RICA .................... .. ........ ...... ..............................................197 SECTION5.1 ALLEGEDBREACHES OF AN ALLEGEDCUSTOMARY RIGHT TO FISII ...................................... 197 SECTION 5.2 ALLEGEDBREACHES 01' AN ALLEGEDRIGI.IT TO RE-SUPPLYBORDER POSTS ...........................204 SECTION5.3 ALLEGEDBREACI~ES 0I''rHE ALLEGEDRIGHT OF COSTARICAN VESSELS NOT TO CARRYTFlE FLAGOF NICARAGUAIN THE WATERSOF THE SANJUAN ~VER.............................................. 2 1 CHAPTER 6 COSTA RICA'S RESPONSE TO NICARAGUA'S POLICY OF COOPERATlON AND GOOD NEIGHBOURLJNESS THE ATTEMPTS BY COSTA RICA TO REVISE THE I858 TREATY B Y INDIRECT MEANS .......................... ... ........................................................... ....................................... 213 SECTION 6.1 NICARAGUA'SGENERAL POLICY OF COOPERATION........................................................... 2 13 A. ARMEDNAVIGATION ............................. ., ........................................................................... 21 4 B. PLEASUREBOATING ......................... .. .......................................................................... 224 COMCLUS~........................................................................................................................ 226 SECrION 6.2 NICARAGUA'SFACILITATION OF TRAFFIC ON THE ~VER....................................................... 229 CONCLUSION,....................................................................................................................... 237 CHAPTER 7 REMEDIES ............................. ... ...... ............+..-.................................................-...-................ 239 SECTION7.1 THE REMEDIES REQUESTEDBY COSTARICA ............................................................................ 239 SECTION7.2 DECLARATIONREQUESTED BY NICARAGUA..................................... .. .................................246 RESERVATIONS ...................,........ ............ ...............251 111 SUBMISSIONS ...,........................... ,,, ......,. ..,............... .....,..............253 LIST OF ANNEXES ..................... ................ .,.............. 255 INTRODUCTION Section 1 The Procedure and the Jurisdiction of the Court 1 On 29 September 2005, Costa Rica filed an Application before the Court by which she requested the Court "to adjudge and declare that Nicaragua is in breach of its international obligations .. in denying to Costa Rica the free exercise of its rights of navigation and associated rights on the San Juan kver"' . 2 Costa Rica filed her Memorial on 29 August 2096, within the time-limit fixed by the Court's Order of 29 November 2005. The present Counter- Memoriul is filed in accordance with the same Court's Order which fixed 29 May 2007 as the tirne-limit for its deposit. 3 In her Memorial, Costa Rica bases the jurisdiction of the Court on "the declarations of acceptance made respectively by the Republic of Costa Rica dated 20 February 1973, and by the Republic of Nicaragua dated 24 September 1 929" combined with the Tovar-Caldera Declaration of 26 September 2002 and on Article XXXI of the American Treaty on Pacific Settlement of Disputes, Bogota, of 30 April 1948 (the Pact of ~o~oti)~. Nicaragua does not take issue with these assertions and fully accepts the Court's jurisdiction in the present case. 4 However, Nicaragua wishes to make very clear that while she accepts the jurisdiction of the Court, she nevertheless considers that the issues raised ' CRM, para. 12. CRM, p. 3, para. E .09. by Costa Rica have already been settled by the 1858 Treaty and the 1888 Cleveland Award. The 1886 treaty by which the parties submitted the dispute to President Cleveland provides in Article VII that the award "shall be held to be obligatory between the contracting parties. No other recourse shall be admitted." Costa Rica should thus not be permitted to raise again matters that have already been decided. Section 2 The History and the Background of the Case 5. Soon after the Spanish arrived in America and explorer Vasco Nuiiez de Balboa discovered the Pacific Ocean in 1513, the search for a natural waterway or strait that would connect both Oceans began. One of the most promising candidates for having this natural channel between the Oceans was thought to be Nicaragua with her huge Lake and her outlet to the Atlantic, the San Juan de Nicaragua River. 6. This possibility of finding a natural channel through Nicaragua and then as a most favourable site for the cutting of an interoceanic canal, made Nicaragua a most coveted prize by foreign powers and her immediate neighbours. As was acutely observed by an American Diplomat early in the 20Ih Century, in all the international controversies of Nicaragua the true cause of the problem was the desire to control the route of the interoceanic ~hannel.~ 7. Costa Rica's interest became manifest immediately after independence from Spain in 182 1. Although the principle of uti possidetis iurzs. was See below, Chap. 3, Sec. 1 and Chap. 4. 4 CRM,Vol. 2, Annex 14. I ' See para. 1.2,26 below. supposed to rule the division of the colonial territories, Costa Rica took advantage o a civil war raging in Nicaragua and annexed an important part of Nicaragua called Nicoya. The annexation of this territory brought Costa Rica closer to the coveted shores of the Lake of Nicaragua which, added to her post-colonial claim of shared sovereignty over its outlet, the San Juan River, made Costa Rica see herself as the sovereign over any canal route through this natural waterway or, at the very least, a necessary partner in any such enterprise. 8. In 1857, after Nicaragua was prostrated by a war against foreign invaders, Costa Rica took over control of the Lake and River route through Nicaraguan territory. This was seen by Nicaragua as a casus belli and declared war on Costa Rica. This declaration of war prompted the Parties to reach an agreement, an agreement that Nicaragua considered would at long last put an end to Costa Rica's attempts to take over or to at least be considered co-sovereign over the San Juan River. The Agreement was the 1 858 Jerez- Cafias Treaty of Limits. 9. Nicaragua will come back in some
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Place and Mobilities in the Maritime World: the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company in the Caribbean, C
    1 PLACE AND MOBILITIES IN THE MARITIME WORLD: THE ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY IN THE CARIBBEAN, C. 1838 TO 1914 Anyaa Anim-Addo Royal Holloway, University of London PhD Human Geography 2 Declaration of Authorship I, Anyaa Anim-Addo, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________________ 3 Abstract The empirical subject of this thesis is the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company (RMSPC), a British-based steamship company that served the Caribbean from 1842, and extended operations into South America in 1851. I construct a postcolonial historical geography of the RMSPC as it operated in the ‘expanded’ post-emancipation Caribbean. By analysing the steamship service as a network rather than as a ‘tool’ of empire, I foreground the mobilities constructed by this Company, and explore how these mobilities impacted upon maritime places in the Caribbean. In so doing, I develop a ‘tidalectic’ approach to the RMSPC’s past, by expanding upon Kamau Brathwaite’s concept. I argue that tidalectics, in intersection with the ‘new mobilities paradigm’, contributes to an advance in understandings of maritime history, since together they facilitate mobile examinations of the relationship between sea and shore. To develop analysis of the RMSPC’s maritime mobilities, four substantive case studies are presented. The first case study focuses on the RMSPC’s ports-of-call, as mapped by the scheme of routes. The second such chapter considers the steamship itself as place, particularly with reference to social and cultural dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty George W. Shipman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Shipman, George W., "Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty" (1965). Master's Theses. 3906. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3906 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANGLO-AMERICAN ISTHMIAN DIPLOMACY - AND THE CLAYTON-BULWER TREATY by George Shipman w. � A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1965 ACI<NOWLEDGENiENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Edward .N. MacConomy, Ghief of. the Stack and Reader Division of the Library of Congress, for his assistance in mastering that wonderful library. The author was saddened by the deaths of Dr. Charles C. Tansill and Mr. Donald Mugridge, both of whom rendered valuable bibliographical advice, particularly in the National Archives collections. Special thanks are due Dr. Willis F. Dunbar for his invaluable suggestions and advice on the style and content of this investigation. George w. Shipman ii Introduction The Panama Canal is one of the major commercial waterways of the world and, furthermore, it is vital to the defence of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua and El Salvador
    UNIDIR/97/1 UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva Disarmament and Conflict Resolution Project Managing Arms in Peace Processes: Nicaragua and El Salvador Papers: Paulo S. Wrobel Questionnaire Analysis: Lt Col Guilherme Theophilo Gaspar de Oliverra Project funded by: the Ford Foundation, the United States Institute of Peace, the Winston Foundation, the Ploughshares Fund, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the governments of Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Finland, France, Germany, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1997 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. UNIDIR/97/1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.97.0.1 ISBN 92-9045-121-1 Table of Contents Page Previous DCR Project Publications............................... v Preface - Sverre Lodgaard ..................................... vii Acknowledgements ...........................................ix Project Introduction - Virginia Gamba ............................xi List of Acronyms........................................... xvii Maps.................................................... xviii Part I: Case Study: Nicaragua .......................... 1 I. Introduction ....................................... 3 II. National Disputes and Regional Crisis .................. 3 III. The Peace Agreement, the Evolution of the Conflicts and the UN Role.................................... 8 1. The Evolution of the Conflict in Nicaragua............ 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Flood Costa Rica 4410
    2016 Flood Costa Rica 4410 DFO Flood Event 4418 pdf version Costa Rica Flooding, November 28, 2016 Flood Map (Costa Rica) Red color is flood water mapped from ESA Sentinel 1 SAR data.Dark blue is permanent surface water mapped from Landsat 8 image data prior to the flooding. Geotif version Google Earth kmz version Explanation Event Reporting: http://floodobservatory.colorado.edu/Events/2016CostaRica4418/2016CostaRica4418.html[12/2/2016 10:38:44 PM] 2016 Flood Costa Rica 4410 The Flood Observatory maintains a Global Active Archive of large flood events, 1985 to present. It is available to the public in both spreadsheet and GIS formats (both formats together provide the complete Archive). New events are entered into this archive each week. As of the end of 2015, there were 4319 events; each has a unique archive number. Event Mapping: In some cases, severe or damaging floods become the focus of Observatory inundation mapping. As part of collaborations with other organizations, and the Global Flood Partnership, the Observatory's maps and other data are made available to the public. With attribution, they can be used freely, including for commercial purposes, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Geotif versions and GIS files are also provided for these maps through the links below. This event is selected for Observatory production of map and GIS data products.This web page and associated image and map (GIS) files are the permanent Flood Observatory record of this event. This Event: This Flood List link provides a summary. According to Flood List: "Over the last week Hurricane Otto storm has affected parts of Panama, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, causing at least 13 deaths and forcing thousands from their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks 25527 Extensions of Remarks
    September 24, 1990 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 25527 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS MICHIGAN FAMILIES OF THE tion. This person will be responsible for intelli­ were manifestations of the CIA or the Contras, VICTIMS OF PAN AM 103 DE­ gence information, security policy, and plan­ and most influential human rights groups ig­ TERMINED TO HAVE BETTER ning. In addition, the act establishes in the nored our evidence. AVIATION SECURITY Federal Aviation Administration an Assistant We now know that our concerns were justi­ Administrator for Civil Aviation Security who fied. Mass graves of Nicaraguan peasants, HON. WM. S. BROOMFIELD will be responsible for the daily management churchworkers, and farmers are even now OF MICHIGAN and oversight of field security resources and being uncovered throughout the country, and IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES the enforcement of security-related require­ Nicaraguan citizens are lining up to tell similar ments. stories of detention, torture, and execution at Monday, September 24, 1990 The bill also creates the positions of Feder­ the hands of the Sandinista police. I would Mr. BROOMFIELD. Mr. Speaker, a number al Security Manager at domestic high-risk air­ like to submit for the record an article that ap­ of Michigan families of the victims of Pan Am ports and the Foreign Security Liaison Officer peared recently in the Wall Street Journal 103 recently visited Capitol Hill, including Mrs. at foreign high-threat airports. The legislation which details the difficulty that one particular Susan Bennett from Chelsa, and Mrs. Geor­ sets new standards and procedures for the group, the Puebla Institute, had in uncovering gann Fuller and Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • R-PACKAGE Readiness Package R-PP Readiness Preparation Proposal
    Contact Information Juana Argeñal Sandoval Minister Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA) Iván Acosta Montalván Minister Ministry of Finance and Public Credit Paul Oquist Kelly Ministro-Secretario de la Presidencia de la República Edward Francisco Centeno Minister Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Justa del Rosario Pérez Acuña Minister Ministry of Family, Community, Cooperative and Associative Economy Vladimir Gutiérrez Director Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies Fabio Rueda Castellón Co-director National Forestry Institute José Milán Scientific Advisor INETER Ramón Canales Executive Secretary Caribbean Coast Development Secretariat Carlos Alemán Cunningham Coordinator North Caribbean Coast Autonomous Government 2 Debony McDavis President North Caribbean Coast Regional Council Judy Delcy Abraham Omier President South Caribbean Coast Regional Council Shaira Down Morgan Coordinator South Caribbean Coast Autonomous Government Ronald Wittingham President Karata Indigenous Territorial Government Santos Manzanares President Li Lamni Indigenous Territorial Government Lenny Simmons Wathson President Awaltara Indigenous Territorial Government Marjuleth Cassanova Hooker President Pearl Lagoon Indigenous Territorial Government Héctor Santiago Thomas McCrea President Rama Kriol Indigenous Territorial Government Carlos Gutiérrez Pineer President Tasbapounie Indigenous Territorial Government Ralf Mollins Stockhousen President Bluefields Communal Government Justo Felipe Ruiz García Representative, Council of Indigenous
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnóstico Urbano San Juan De Nicaragua ARQUITECTURA Y DESARROLLO URBANO Diciembre Del 2004
    PROYECTO Diagnóstico Urbano San Juan de Nicaragua ARQUITECTURA Y DESARROLLO URBANO Diciembre del 2004 Alcaldía Municipal de San Juan de Nicaragua Diagnóstico Urbano San Juan de Nicaragua 2 Indice 1. Marco General 1.1 Introducción Histórica de San Juan de Nicaragua 1.2 Delimitación del Área de Estudio 1.3 Contexto Territorial; Departamento y Estructura de Asentamiento. 2. Demografía y Situación Socioeconómica 2.1 Estructura y Distribución de la Población 2.2 Situación Socioeconómica 2.3 Interrelación del Área de Estudio con el Contexto Territorial 3. Equipamiento y Servicios Públicos 3.1 Infraestructura Urbana 3.1.1 Electricidad 3.1.2 Infraestructura Vial 3.1.3 Infraestructura de Transporte 3.1.4 Agua Potable 3.1.5 Aguas Negras 3.1.6 Aguas Pluviales 3.1.7 Residuos Sólidos 3.1.8 Comunicaciones 3.2 Administración pública 3.2.1 Sanidad 3.2.2 Educación 3.2.3 Alcaldía 3.2.4 Judicial 3.2.5 Ministerio de Gobernación 3.2.6 Ejército de Nicaragua 3.2.7 Marena 3.3 Equipamiento Público 3.3.1 Deportivo 3.3.2 Religioso 3.3.3 Ocio y Áreas Verdes 3.4 Equipamiento Privado 3.4.1 Hoteles 3.4.2 Bares y Restaurantes 3.4.3 Pulperías 3.4.4 Ocio y Turismo 4. Usos del suelo 5. Imagen Urbana y Patrimonio 5.1 Edificaciones con Valor Urbano Patrimonial 5.2 Análisis Urbano Arquitectónico Diagnóstico Urbano San Juan de Nicaragua 1 Marco General Diagnóstico Urbano San Juan de Nicaragua 4 1.1 Introducción histórica de San Juan de Nicaragua Desde que a mitad del siglo XVI los españoles recorrieron por primera vez el Río San Juan, en busca del “ Secreto del Estrecho “, este se convirtió durante 350 años en la principal ruta de comercio entre América Central y Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of Costa Rica
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISPUTE CONCERNING NAVIGATIONAL AND RELATED RIGHTS (COSTA RICA v. NICARAGUA) MEMORIAL OF COSTA RICA VOLUME 1 29 August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No Chapter 1 Introduction .................................. 1 Scope of the Dispute ............................ 1 The Court's Jurisdiction .......................... 3 The Structure of this Memorial .................... 4 Chapter 2 Geographical and Historical Background .......... 7 A . The geography of the San Juan basin ............... 7 B . Historical background ........................... 9 (1) The San Juan River under Spanish rule (1492-1821) .............................. 9 (2) The post-independence period (1 82 1. 1 856) ..... 11 (a) The proposed trans-Isthmian canal ....... 12 (b) The British protectorate over the Mosquito Indians .................. 12 (c) Agreements between Great Britain and the United States ............ 14 (d) Conflicts arising from the intervention of the filibusters ............ 14 (3) The conclusion of the Treaty of Limits 1858 ..... 15 (4) Nicaragua's challenge to the Treaty of Limits and the Cleveland Award 1888 ......... 16 (5) Implementation of the Treaty of Limits after 1888: the Alexander Awards ............ 20 (6) The 1916 Judgment of the Central American Court of Justice .................. 21 (7) Later developments ........................ 25 Chapter 3 The Dispute before the Court .................... 27 A . Overview ...................................27 B . Nicaragua's violations of Costa Rica's sights between1980and1998 .......................... 27 Nicaragua's violations from 1998 to the present ....... 33 Attempts by Costa Rica to resolve the dispute ........ 37 (1) Commerce as communication ................1 19 (2) Commerce as transportation of goods and persons (including tourism) ..............123 D . Breaches of Costa Rica's rights of protection of commerce. safeguard. defence and re-supply of police posts .................................124 E . Breaches of other Related Rights .................
    [Show full text]
  • A Nicaraguan Exceptionalism? Debating the Legacy of the Sandinista Revolution
    A Nicaraguan Exceptionalism? Debating the Legacy of the Sandinista Revolution edited by Hilary Francis INSTITUTE OF LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES A Nicaraguan Exceptionalism? Debating the Legacy of the Sandinista Revolution edited by Hilary Francis Institute of Latin American Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2020 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/. This book is also available online at http://humanities-digital-library.org. ISBN: 978-1-908857-57-6 (paperback edition) 978-1-908857-78-1 (.epub edition) 978-1-908857-79-8 (.mobi edition) 978-1-908857-77-4 (PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/220.9781908857774 (PDF edition) Institute of Latin American Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House London WC1E 7HU Telephone: 020 7862 8844 Email: [email protected] Web: http://ilas.sas.ac.uk Typesetting by Thomas Bohm, User Design, Illustration and Typesetting. Cover image © Franklin Villavicencio. Contents List of illustrations v Notes on contributors vii Introduction: exceptionalism and agency in Nicaragua’s revolutionary heritage 1 Hilary Francis 1. ‘We didn’t want to be like Somoza’s Guardia’: policing, crime and Nicaraguan exceptionalism 21 Robert Sierakowski 2. ‘The revolution was so many things’ 45 Fernanda Soto 3. Nicaraguan food policy: between self-sufficiency and dependency 61 Christiane Berth 4. On Sandinista ideas of past connections to the Soviet Union and Nicaraguan exceptionalism 87 Johannes Wilm 5.
    [Show full text]
  • William Walker and the Nicaraguan Filibuster War of 1855-1857
    ELLIS, JOHN C. William Walker and the Nicaraguan Filibuster War of 1855-1857. (1973) Directed by: Dr. Franklin D. Parker. Pp. 118 The purpose of this paper is to show how William Walker was toppled from power after initially being so i • successful in Nicaragua. Walker's attempt at seizing Nicaragua from 1855 to 1857 caused international conster- ■ nation not only throughout Central America but also in the capitals of Washington and London. Within four months of entering Nicaragua with only I fifty-seven followers. Walker had brought Nicaragua under his domination. In July, 1856 Walker had himself inaugurated as President of Nicaragua. However, Walker's amazing career in Nicaragua was to last only briefly, as the opposition of the Legitimists in Nicaragua coupled with the efforts of the other Central American nations removed Walker from power. Walker's ability as a military commander in the use of military strategy and tactics did not shine forth like his ability to guide and lead men. Walker did not learn from his mistakes. He attempted to use the same military tactics over and over, especially in attempts to storm towns which if properly defended were practically impreg- nable fortresses. Walker furthermore abandoned without a fight several strong defensive positions which could have been used to prevent or deter the Allied offensives. Administratively, Walker committed several glaring errors. The control of the Accessory Transit Company was a very vital issue, but Walker dealt with it as if it were of minor im- portance. The outcome of his dealings with the Accessory Transit Company was a great factor in his eventual overthrow as President of Nicaragua.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Integrated Management of Biodiversity in the Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve
    Sustainable Integrated Management of Biodiversity in the Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10674 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund GET CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Sustainable Integrated Management of Biodiversity in the Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve Countries Nicaragua Agency(ies) FAO Other Executing Partner(s) Executing Partner Type Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (MARENA) Government GEF Focal Area Biodiversity Taxonomy Tropical Rain Forests, Biomes, Biodiversity, Focal Areas, Productive Landscapes, Protected Areas and Landscapes, Terrestrial Protected Areas, Forestry - Including HCVF and REDD+, Mainstreaming, Agriculture and agrobiodiversity, Tourism, Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands, Sustainable Land Management, Land Degradation, Strengthen institutional capacity and decision-making, Influencing models, Indigenous Peoples, Stakeholders, Beneficiaries, Individuals/Entrepreneurs, Private Sector, Participation, Type of Engagement, Consultation, Public Campaigns, Communications, Local Communities, Community Based Organization, Civil Society, Academia, Gender Mainstreaming, Gender Equality, Capacity Development, Gender results areas, Capacity, Knowledge and Research, Knowledge Generation, Knowledge Exchange, Learning Rio Markers Climate Change Mitigation Climate Change Mitigation 1 Climate Change Adaptation Climate Change Adaptation 1 Duration 60 In Months Agency Fee($) 282,874.00 Submission Date 9/28/2020 A. Indicative Focal/Non-Focal Area Elements Programming Directions Trust Fund GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) BD-1-1 GET 1,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 BD-2-7 GET 1,977,626.00 13,843,382.00 Total Project Cost ($) 2,977,626.00 20,843,382.00 B. Indicative Project description summary Project Objective To conserve globally important biodiversity and enhance ecosystem services in the Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve (RBIM) in partnership with indigenous peoples and local communities Project Financing Project Outcomes Project Outputs Trust GEF Amount($) Co-Fin Amount($) Component Type Fund 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission by A!?"?/¥
    M\NUTE 1Ti:M 31 This Calendar Item No. ~ was a3roved as Minute ltem No. by the State Lan~ commission by a!?"?/¥_-­ to O at its ....i.z..,,,;.'{!..-~...... -- meetlng. CALENDAR ITEM 09/14/88 A 2 - 31 W 23867 PRC 7247 Lou1.e s 2 APPROVAL OF A SALVttGE PERMIT Sea Epics Research, Inc. APPLICANT: c/o Donald G. Knight 1334-B Diamond Bar Boulevard Diamond Bar, California 9176S AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION: A 8.S-acre ~ -eel of tide arid submerged lands in the Pacit1~ Ocean offshore from Cres~ent City. Salvage operations on wreck site of Brother LAND USE: Jonathan; salvage operations shall only consist of the retrieval of the Doublier safe and its contents. TERMS 'OF PROPOSED PERMIT: One year beginning on1 the day Initial period: the salvage permit is• e~ecuted on behalf at the State Lands Commission. Surety bond: $10,000. Publit liability insurance: Combined single limit coverage of $1,000,00C. Permittee must hau~ Workman's Special: Compensation Insuran~e coverage satisfactory to the State. -1- CALENDAR ITEM NO. 31 (CONT'D} CONSIDERATION: $22S land rental, and 25 percent of the net salvage value of $25,000 or less, and SO percent of the net salva~e value in excess of $25,000 for salvaged items sold or items retained by the State or the Permittee. Disposition of items not sold and not retained by the state or Permittee shall be determined by mutual agreement between the State and the Permittee upon termination of the permit. BASIS FOR CONSIDERATION:Pursuant to 2 Cal.
    [Show full text]