Biodiesel and Other Renewable Diesel Fuels
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015 Plastics to Fuel Developer's Guide
2015 PLASTICS-TO-FUEL PROJECT DEVELOPER’S GUIDE Prepared For: The American Chemistry Council Prepared By: OCEAN RECOVERY ALLIANCE 20th Floor, Central Tower 28 Queen's Road Central Hong Kong TEL: (852) 2803-0018 c/o Malibu Foundation, 1471 S. Bedford St. #3, Los Angeles, Calif. 90035 TEL: (310)-614-5578 www.oceanrecov.org June 2015 1 Disclaimer: The 2015 Plastics-to-Fuel Project Developer’s Guide was prepared to educate prospective stakeholders on the current state of the plastics-to-fuel industry and offer considerations for developing a system. The views expressed here are those of the authors and should not be perceived as an endorsement of any technology provider or solution. Interested parties are advised to engage in direct consultation with technology providers to obtain additional, opportunity-specific costing and performance data when appropriate. The American Chemistry Council does not make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this report; nor does the American Chemistry Council assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from the use of or reliance upon any information, conclusion, or options contained herein. The American Chemistry Council sponsored this report. About OCEAN RECOVERY ALLIANCE: OCEAN RECOVERY ALLIANCE (ORA) and the American Chemistry Council are working together to reduce plastic in the ocean environment. ORA is a 501c3 registered non- profit in California and a registered charitable organization in Hong Kong that seeks to introduce innovative projects and initiatives that will help improve our ocean environment by bringing together new ways of thinking, technologies, creativity and collaborations. -
2020 ETHANOL INDUSTRY OUTLOOK 1 Focusing Forward, from Challenge to Opportunity
RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION RFA Board of Directors Neil Koehler RFA Chairman Pacific Ethanol Inc. www.pacificethanol.com Jeanne McCaherty Charles Wilson Geoff Cooper Rick Schwarck RFA Vice Chair RFA Treasurer RFA President RFA Secretary Guardian Energy LLC Trenton Agri Products LLC Renewable Fuels Association Absolute Energy LLC www.guardiannrg.com www.trentonagriproducts.com www.EthanolRFA.org www.absenergy.org Neal Kemmet Mick Henderson Brian Kletscher Bob Pasma Ace Ethanol LLC Commonwealth Agri-Energy LLC Highwater Ethanol LLC Parallel Products www.aceethanol.com www.commonwealthagrienergy.com www.highwaterethanol.com www.parallelproducts.com Ray Baker Scott Mundt Pat Boyle Delayne Johnson Adkins Energy LLC Dakota Ethanol LLC Homeland Energy Solutions LLC Quad County Corn Processors Coop. www.adkinsenergy.com www.dakotaethanol.com www.homelandenergysolutions.com www.quad-county.com Eric McAfee John Didion Seth Harder Dana Lewis Aemetis Inc. Didion Ethanol LLC Husker Ag LLC Redfield Energy LLC www.aemetis.com www.didionmilling.com www.huskerag.com www.redfieldenergy.com Randall Doyal Carl Sitzmann Kevin Keiser Walter Wendland Al-Corn Clean Fuel LLC E Energy Adams LLC Ingredion Inc. Ringneck Energy LLC www.al-corn.com www.eenergyadams.com www.ingredion.com www.ringneckenergy.com Erik Huschitt Bill Pracht Chuck Woodside Brian Pasbrig Badger State Ethanol LLC East Kansas Agri-Energy LLC KAAPA Ethanol Holdings LLC Show Me Ethanol LLC www.badgerstateethanol.com www.ekaellc.com www.kaapaethanol.com www.smefuel.com Jim Leiting Jason Friedberg -
Conversion Technologies for Advanced Biofuels – Bio-Oil Production
Conversion Technologies for Advanced Biofuels – Bio-Oil Production Report-Out Webinar David Dayton, Ph.D. February 9, 2012 RTI International 1 EnergyProgram Efficiency Name or &Ancillary Renewable Text Energy eere.energy.gov Bio-oil Production – Presenter Information Dr. David C. Dayton Director, Chemistry and Biofuels Center for Energy Technology RTI International 2007 – present RTI International 1993 – 2007 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1991-1993 U.S. Army Research Laboratory • Ph.D., Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 2000 • B.S., Biochemistry, cum laude, Washington State University, 1995 Over 18 years of project management and research experience in biomass thermochemical conversion R&D involving biomass combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis. Manage projects related to synthesis gas conversion, synthesis gas cleanup and conditioning, and catalytic biomass pyrolysis. Focus on expanding integrated biorefinery technology development activities for biofuels production. 2 Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov State-of-Technology Current State-of-the-Art Bio-oil Production Gas – CO, CO2CxHy H H O, CO H H O, CO (C2) 2 2 2 2 2 2 Technology Options Fast Pyrolysis Biomass Flash Bio-oil Biofuel Hydroprocessing (Cin) Pyrolysis Stabilization (Cout) (0.1 MPa and ~500°C) Bio-oil Stabilization Char Coke Coke ° (C1) (C3) (C4) (10 MPa, 150-250 C) Hydroprocessing (20 MPa, 300-350°C) Next Generation Technology Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis (0.1 MPa and ~500°C) Gas – CO, CO2, CHxHy, 2 H2 H2O, -
Renewable Diesel Fuel
Renewable Diesel Fuel Robert McCormick and Teresa Alleman July 18, 2016 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Renewable Diesel Fuel Nomenclature • Renewable diesel goes by many names: o Generic names – Hydrogenated esters and fatty acids (HEFA) diesel – Hydrogenation derived renewable diesel (HDRD) – Green diesel (colloquialism) o Company trademark names – Green Diesel™ (Honeywell/UOP) – NExBTL® (Neste) – SoladieselRD® (Solazyme) – Biofene® (Amyris) – HPR Diesel (Propel branded product) – REG-9000™/RHD • Not the same as biodiesel, may be improperly called second generation biodiesel, paraffinic biodiesel – but it is incorrect and misleading to refer to it as biodiesel 2 RD is a Very Broad Term • Renewable diesel (RD) is essentially any diesel fuel produced from a renewable feedstock that is predominantly hydrocarbon (not oxygenates) and meets the requirements for use in a diesel engine • Today almost all renewable diesel is produced from vegetable oil, animal fat, waste cooking oil, and algal oil o Paraffin/isoparaffin mixture, distribution of chain lengths • One producer ferments sugar to produce a hydrocarbon (Amyris – more economical to sell this hydrocarbon into other markets) o Single molecule isoparaffin product 3 RD and Biodiesel • Biodiesel is solely produced through esterification of fats/oils • RD can be produced through multiple processes o Hydrogenation (hydrotreating) of fats/oils/esters o Fermentation -
Fuel Properties Comparison
Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb. -
1 the Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Measuring the Impact on Crude Oil and Gasoline Prices Philip K. Verleger, Jr.1 This Paper
The Renewable Fuel Standard Program: Measuring the Impact on Crude Oil and Gasoline Prices Philip K. Verleger, Jr.1 This paper examines the impact of the Renewable Fuel Standard program (RFS) on crude oil and gasoline prices. The RFS program was enacted fourteen years ago in 2005, but the particular focus of this paper is on the period from 2015 to 2018. The conclusions offered from this research are that the RFS program has provided economic benefits to consumers in the United States and worldwide. Retail gasoline prices are lower thanks to the program. The findings from an econometric model show that the savings to consumers resulting from the RFS averaged $0.22 per gallon from 2015 through 2018. Quantifying the Benefits of Renewable Fuels The first and most obvious benefit from renewables lies in the price of crude oil. The blending of approximately one million barrels per day of ethanol into U.S. motor fuels over the 2015 through 2018 period has lowered the average price of crude by $6 per barrel. This reduction has cut the retail gasoline price by $0.22 per gallon from the level that would have obtained absent the presence of ethanol in the motor gasoline supply. The lowering of gasoline prices confers a second benefit on consumers. Because gasoline demand is price inelastic, consumers have been able to allocate a smaller percentage of their total consumption budget to fuel purchases. This has allowed them to expend more on other goods. Over four years, US consumers have been able to spend almost $90 billion per year more on other goods because of gasoline prices being pulled down by renewable fuel use. -
Move Forward with NEXBTL Renewable Diesel
Move Forward with Did you know that… NEXBTL renewable diesel As a drop-in biofuel, NEXBTL renewable diesel behaves exactly like fossil diesel. Because of its diesel-like behavior, quality-related blending limitations do not apply to NEXBTL renewable diesel. NEXBTL renewable diesel offers 40–90% CO2 reduction compared to fossil diesel. Neste Corporation Keilaranta 21 Cover image: Shutterstock PO Box 95 FI-00095 Neste, Finland Tel. +358 (0)10 45811 www.neste.com 2015 High performance from NEXBTL renewable diesel “Our experience has been extremely positive in our own fleet. We have experienced zero customer complaints or Premium-quality NEXBTL renewable diesel outperforms both issues.” conventional biodiesel and fossil diesel by a clear margin. Pat O’Keefe, Vice President, Golden Gate Petroleum, US Unlike conventional biodiesel, Neste’s NEXBTL NEXBTL renewable diesel is unique. Proprietary renewable diesel has no blending wall, and therefore hydrotreating technology converts vegetable oil it also offers greater possibilities for meeting biofuel and waste fats into premium-quality fuel. mandates. Therefore, NEXBTL renewable diesel is a pure hydrocarbon with significant performance and emission benefits. Benefits in brief 100% renewable and sustainable Lower operating costs Produced from waste fats, residues and vegetable oils, Other biofuels may increase the need for vehicle classified as hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) maintenance, for example through reduced oil change intervals, but with NEXBTL renewable diesel there is no Smaller environmental -
Biogas As a Transport Fuel—A System Analysis of Value Chain Development in a Swedish Context
sustainability Article Biogas as a Transport Fuel—A System Analysis of Value Chain Development in a Swedish Context Muhammad Arfan *, Zhao Wang, Shveta Soam and Ola Eriksson Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden; [email protected] (Z.W.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (O.E.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-704-400-593 Abstract: Biofuels policy instruments are important in the development and diffusion of biogas as a transport fuel in Sweden. Their effectiveness with links to geodemographic conditions has not been analysed systematically in studying biogas development in a less urbanised regions, with high po- tential and primitive gas infrastructure. One such region identified is Gävleborg in Sweden. By using value chain statistics, interviews with related actors, and studying biofuels policy instruments and implications for biogas development, it is found that the policy measures have not been as effective in the region as in the rest of Sweden due to different geodemographic characteristics of the region, which has resulted in impeded biogas development. In addition to factors found in previous studies, the less-developed biogas value chain in this region can be attributed particularly to undefined rules of the game, which is lack of consensus on trade-off of resources and services, unnecessary competition among several fuel alternatives, as well as the ambiguity of municipalities’ prioritization, and regional cultural differences. To strengthen the regional biogas sector, system actors need a strategy to eliminate blocking effects of identified local factors, and national policy instruments should provide mechanisms to process geographical conditions in regulatory, economic support, Citation: Arfan, M.; Wang, Z.; Soam, and market formation. -
The Impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on Food and Feed Prices
BRIEFING © 2021 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2021 The impact of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard on food and feed prices Jane O’Malley, Stephanie Searle Stakeholders have engaged in significant debate around the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and its impact on food and feed prices since its implementation in 2005. Various stakeholders have expressed concerns that the RFS has adverse economic impacts on consumers, livestock farmers, food manufacturers, and restaurants. This briefing paper reviews evidence of the impacts of the RFS on food prices, with a focus on corn and soy, and presents new analysis on the impact of the RFS on U.S. livestock farmers. We summarize the history of debate surrounding the RFS from the perspective of farmers, industry, and policymakers, and analyze its economic impacts relative to a counterfactual, no-RFS scenario. BACKGROUND ON THE RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD AND NATIONAL DEBATE Farmers in the United States consider the RFS to be a boon for their industry, particularly for the crops that are biofuel feedstocks, most notably corn and soybean. Today, nearly 40% of the U.S. national corn crop, or 6.2 billion bushels, is used for ethanol production while approximately 30% of soy oil produced in the United States is used in biodiesel.1 The RFS is generally believed by stakeholders to increase corn prices. www.theicct.org 1 David W. Olson and Thomas Capehart, “Dried Distillers Grains (DDGs) Have Emerged as a Key Ethanol Coproduct,” United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, October 1, 2019, https:// [email protected] www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2019/october/dried-distillers-grains-ddgs-have-emerged-as-a-key-ethanol- coproduct/; U.S. -
Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management
Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management Bary Wilson, Ph.D. Barry Liss, Ph.D., P.E Brandon Wilson, Ph.D., P.E May 2019 EnviroPower Renewable, Inc. 7301A Palmetto Parkway Rd. Suite 206B Boca Raton, FL 33433 www.eprenewable.com EPR Doc. 05212019 © 2019 EPR All Rights Reserved 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Plastics................................................................................................................................................... 5 Plastics Recycling................................................................................................................................... 6 Diesel Fuels ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Premium Diesel ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel .......................................................................................................... -
Renewable Fuels Standard
EmergingEmerging AlternativeAlternative FuelFuel IssuesIssues May, 2007 Agricultural Air Quality Task Force Meeting Paul Argyropoulos, Senior Policy Advisor EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality FutureFuture forfor FuelsFuels MeetingMeeting inin thethe Middle?Middle? - Currently, More Questions than Answers - Environment Energy Economics The Sweet Spot ? 2 ExistingExisting andand EmergingEmerging IssuesIssues ThatThat WillWill ImpactImpact thethe FuelsFuels MixMix Production Technologies Infrastructure Sustainable Feedstocks Economics Metrics: Lifecycle, Energy, Hybrid Federal / State Incentives Energy Security, Diversity Vehicles/Engines and Sustainability Fleet Efficiency Environmental Protection: Fuel Types and Multi-Media Issues Usage Scenarios The Sweet Spot? Meeting Energy Needs, Environmental Protection Economically Sustainable 3 WhereWhere AreAre WeWe Now?Now? Federal Fuels – Systems / Integrated Approach Final National RFS – April 10, 2007 Reformulated Fuels Impact of Removal of Oxy Requirement Conventional Fuels The Re-emergence of “Alternative Fuels”? New/Future Fuels State Fuels State Air Quality Fuels (SIP Fuels) State Renewable and Alternative Fuels Other EPAct Section 1509 – Fuels Harmonization vs. Trend Toward Diversification National Biofuels Action Plan Biomass Research and Development Board National Advisory Council for Energy Policy and Technology 4 OverviewOverview ofof 20062006 U.S.U.S. FuelFuel RequirementsRequirements Source: ExxonMobil 2007 5 BoutiqueBoutique FuelsFuels fromfrom StateState -
Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State
energies Review Quantifying the Potential of Renewable Natural Gas to Support a Reformed Energy Landscape: Estimates for New York State Stephanie Taboada 1,2, Lori Clark 2,3, Jake Lindberg 1,2, David J. Tonjes 2,3,4 and Devinder Mahajan 1,2,* 1 Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 Institute of Gas Innovation and Technology, Advanced Energy Research and Technology, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (D.J.T.) 3 Department of Technology and Society, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 4 Waste Data and Analysis Center, Stony Brook University, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Public attention to climate change challenges our locked-in fossil fuel-dependent energy sector. Natural gas is replacing other fossil fuels in our energy mix. One way to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) impact of fossil natural gas is to replace it with renewable natural gas (RNG). The benefits of utilizing RNG are that it has no climate change impact when combusted and utilized in the same applications as fossil natural gas. RNG can be injected into the gas grid, used as a transportation fuel, or used for heating and electricity generation. Less common applications include utilizing RNG to produce chemicals, such as methanol, dimethyl ether, and ammonia. The GHG impact should be quantified before committing to RNG. This study quantifies the potential production of biogas (i.e., Citation: Taboada, S.; Clark, L.; the precursor to RNG) and RNG from agricultural and waste sources in New York State (NYS).