DOCSLIB.ORG

Harrogate Borough Council Planning Committee – Agenda Item 6: List of Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harrogate Borough Council Planning Committee – Agenda Item 6: List of Plans HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE – AGENDA ITEM 6: LIST OF PLANS. DATE: 31 March 2015 PLAN: 02 CASE NUMBER: 12/03934/EIAMAJ GRID REF: EAST 425087 NORTH 455635 APPLICATION NO. 6.500.271.EIAMAJ DATE MADE VALID: 05.10.2012 TARGET DATE: 04.01.2013 REVISED TARGET: 02.04.2015 CASE OFFICER: Mr Gerard Walsh WARD: Falls Within 2 Or More VIEW PLANS AT: http://uniformonline.harrogate.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=MBXJCLHY05P00 APPLICANT: Tapar (PF) Ltd AGENT: WYG Planning And Environment PROPOSAL: Erection of 4 wind turbines (maximum height 110m high) and associated infrastructure including control building with substation and formation of vehicle access, access tracks and areas of hard standing, underground cabling and temporary construction compound. LOCATION: Land Comprising Field At 425087 455635 Penny Pot Lane Hampsthwaite North Yorkshire REPORT SITE AND PROPOSAL Full planning permission is sought for the erection of four wind turbines with a maximum overall height (to blade tip) of 110 metres and hub height up to 70 metres, together with a new access and access tracks, temporary construction compound, hard standing areas and control building with substation. The site covers 11.98ha and is located south of Penny Pot Lane approximately 5km west of Harrogate town centre. The site is in agricultural use involving grassland for dairy farming. The boundaries of the site are largely defined by field hedgerows and walls. The surrounding area is predominantly agricultural with farm houses and farm buildings and isolated dwelling houses. The Army Foundation College is situated approximately 1.1km to the east, the villages of Kettlesing and Hampsthwaite approximately 3km to the north and Fewston and Swinsty Reservoirs approximately 4.5km to the southwest. The Knabs Ridge wind farm is located approximately 1.8km northwest of the site on the opposite side of Penny Pot lane. The nearest residential properties are at Whinhill Farm (250 metres to the south), Prospect Farm (390 metres to the south), and Central House Farm approximately 400 metres to the south. High Moor Caravan Park is approximately 600 metres to the northwest on the opposite side of Penny Pot Lane. The boundary to the Nidderdale AONB is approximately 800 metres to the north. There are no public rights of way within the site and no overhead electricity lines crossing the site. The scheme has the potential to provide up to 12 Megawatts of energy, which is equivalent to the amount of electricity used by approximately 5,800 average households. As a result this could save the equivalent of 11,300 tonnes of CO2 emissions per year. The applicant selected the site on the basis of a number of criteria including the predicted wind resource, the availability of electrical connection, access (particularly for long load items), military and aviation constraints, separation from dwellings, landscape and visual impact, historic environment matters and nature conservation. The applicant has advised that, based on these criteria, the proposed site was identified as a potential location for a wind farm. The applicant has advised that the electricity generated will be used to satisfy local demand and to that end a dedicated electrical cable is proposed which will transfer energy from the development to the local distribution network. Each turbine will be coloured pale grey with a semi-matt finish. The control building will be constructed in stone with pitched tiled roof. The proposal is designed to have a 25 year operational life after which it will be decommissioned with the turbines removed and buildings and foundations broken out to below ground level. The access track will either be left for use by the landowner or covered with topsoil. The application is supported by the following documents: * Environmental Impact Statement and Non-Technical Summary * Design and Access Statement * Planning Statement * Statement of Community Involvement MAIN ISSUES 1. Principle/Benefits of the Proposal 2. Landscape Impacts 3. Residential Amenity 4. Aviation Matters 5. Heritage Assets 6. Highways 7. Ecology 8. Planning Balance RELEVANT SITE HISTORY 11/05184/SCOPE - Scoping opinion for proposed wind farm. CONSULTATIONS/NOTIFICATIONS Leeds/Bradford Airport The proposed wind farm is unlikely to conflict with LBIA aviation interests. Business And Environmental Services No comments received HAVERAH PARK PARISH COUNCIL (119,120) FELLISCLIFFE PARISH COUNCIL (99) Countryside Agency No comments received Environment Agency - Dales Area Office No objection subject to conditions to control surface water run-off. Natural England Natural England objects to this proposal, as they consider that the scale, nature and impact of the proposal are likely to adversely affect the purpose/s for which Nidderdale AONB has been designated. They suggest further mitigation is provided to enhance habitat for lapwing and golden plover outside of the area affected by displacement - This could be controlled by condition. Health and Safety Executive No comments received Ilkley Parish Council Northern Gas Networks (Joint Radio) No objection. BBC R And D No comments received Leeds/Bradford Airport The proposal is unlikely to conflict with the aviation interests in regard to Leeds Bradford International Airport. Environmental Health An independent noise consultant was employed to assess the impact on surrounding properties and on the basis of their report there is an objection to the proposal because of potential noise disturbance to surrounding residential properties - See assessment. Landscape Officer Objection. See assessment. Planning Policy No objection to the principle of the proposal. Home Office No comments received Cable & Wireless Worldwide No objection. Policy Dev Unit NYCC No comments received Principal Ecologist No objection subject to conditions. NYCC Highways And Transportation No objection subject to conditions. See assessment. MOD Safeguarding Objection. See Assessment. Heritage Unit of NYCC Trial trenching should be carried out to establish if there are any unrecorded archaeological remains on the site. This could be controlled by condition if necessary. AONB - Joint Advisory Committee Objection: The AONB's Joint Advisory Committee believes that the AONB's landscapes are highly sensitive to the type of large scale development proposed for the High Boar site. The LVIA conceded that the proposal will result in an impact on the AONB that is 'Considerable/Moderate Adverse in places'. The committee believe that the impact will be more wide spread, and more severe. This is unacceptable in a nationally designated landscape and contrary to the NPPF. National Air Traffic Services Ltd Objection - see assessment. Arqiva (formerly NTL) No objection. Arqiva is responsible for providing the BBC and ITV's transmission network. 02 UK Ltd No comments received Office Of Communications - Spectrum No objections raised. British Telecom (Radio Network Protection) No objection. Yorkshire Dales National Park They have advised that they have no comments to make on the application. Historic England The proposal will have an impact on heritage assets but the harm will be 'less than significant' and therefore the harm must be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. Conditions proposed if the council are minded to approve. DCS Arboricultural Officer No objection. Yorkshire Water No objection subject to condition to protect existing watermain which runs across the site frontage. Conservation and Design Section Concerns about the impact on heritage assets. Vodafone (Telent) No comments received HAMPSTHWAITE PARISH COUNCIL (92) Leeds City Council No comments received Craven District Council No comments received City of Bradford Metropolitan Council No comments received The National Trust Accept that the application by itself may not have a significant impact but concern about cumulative visual impact. Serious concerns about the impact on Brimham Rocks. Inadequate consideration of impact on Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal. Ramblers Association Group - Mr B Ellis Unacceptable visual impact. The proposed turbines are sufficiently close to the public right of way to the south of the site to result in them being extremely intimidating both visually and in relation to noise emissions for walkers. As a consequence the local peace and tranquillity of the countryside will be disturbed. The British Horse Society No comments received RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY NPPF National Planning Policy Framework CSSG3 Core Strategy Policy SG3 Settlement Growth: Conservation of the countryside, including Green Belt CSSG4 Core Strategy Policy SG4 Settlement Growth: Design and Impact CSEQ1 Core Strategy Policy EQ1: Reducing risks to the environment CSEQ2 Core Strategy Policy EQ2: The natural and built environment and green belt LPC02 Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy C2, Landscape Character LPR11 Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy R11, Rights of Way LPHD20 Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy HD20, Design of New Development and Redevelopment LPHD03 Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy HD3, Control of development in Conservation Areas LPHD07 Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy HD7, World Heritage Site LPHD7A Harrogate District Local Plan (2001, as altered 2004) Policy HD7A, Parks & Gardens of Historic Interest SPDHRM Supplementary Planning Document: Heritage Management SPGLAP Supplementary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrogate District Planning and Climate Change Study
    Harrogate Borough Council May 2011 Harrogate District Planning and Climate Change Study Prepared by: Checked by: Abena Poku-Awuah Zac Grant Senior Consultant Associate Director Harrogate District Planning and Climate Change Study Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Draft report HP RS 31/3/10 2 Draft report QA HP RS 15/4/10 3 Revised draft report submitted to Harrogate Borough Council NI NI 29/4/10 4 Final draft report APA ZG 25/10/10 5 Final BS ZG 25/01/10 6 Final with minor amendments BS BS 10/05/11 The Johnson Building, 77 Hatton Garden, London, EC1N 8JS Telephone: 020 7645 2000 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60142943 Reference Draft Report Date Created May 201 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Table of Contents Non Technical Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Baseline carbon emissions ............................................................................................................................................ 14 3 Opportunities for Energy Efficiency .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements of Innogy SE 2017
    Financial Statements of innogy SE 2017 02 Financial Statements of innogy SE The financial statements and review of operations of innogy SE for the 2017 fiscal year are submitted electronically to Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of innogy SE has been combined with the review of operations of the innogy Group and has been published in our annual report on pages 17 to 110. Contents Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 4 Responsibility statement 24 Roll-forward of non-current assets (part of the notes) – Annex I 25 List of shareholdings (part of the notes) – Annex II 28 Boards (part of the notes) – Annex III 55 Activity reports 60 Independent auditor’s report 68 Financial calendar 75 Imprint 76 Balance Sheet at 31 December 2017 Assets Note 31 Dec 2017 31 Dec 2016 € million Non-current assets (1) Intangible assets 78.5 9.5 Property, plant and equipment 312.6 317.9 Financial assets 22,655.4 22,298.1 23,046.5 22,625.5 Current assets Inventories (2) 64.0 54.4 Accounts receivable and other assets (3) 6,808.7 2,965.6 Marketable securities 386.2 758.7 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 595.2 899.5 7,854.1 4,678.2 Prepaid expenses (5) 132.8 90.6 31,033.4 27,394.3 Equity and liabilities Note 31 Dec 2017 31 Dec 2016 € million Equity (6) Subscribed capital 1,111.1 1,111.1 Additional paid-in capital 6,209.6 6,209.6 Retained earnings 716.4 698.0 Distributable profit 889.0 889.7 8,926.1 8,908.4 Exceptional items with a reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements 2020 for RWE AG
    Financial Statements of RWE AG Financial Statements of RWE AG The financial statements and review of operations of RWE AG for the 2020 fiscal year are submitted electronically to Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of RWE AG has been combined with the review of operations of the RWE Group and is published in our annual report on pages 21 to 96. Balance Sheet .. 2 Income Statement .. 3 Notes .. 3 Dividend Proposal (Part of the Notes) 16 List of Shareholdings (Part of the Notes) 17 Boards (Part of the Notes) 51 Responsibility Statement 58 Independent Auditor’s Report 59 Financial Calendar 64 Imprint 65 Financial Statements of RWE AG 2020 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet at 31 December 2020 Assets (Notes) 31 Dec 2020 31 Dec 2019 Equity and liabilities (Notes) 31 Dec 2020 31 Dec 2019 € million € million Non-current assets (1) Equity (7) Financial assets 20,524 20,628 Subscribed capital Current assets Common shares 1,731 1,574 Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Capital reserve 4,228 2,385 Accounts receivable from affiliated companies 2,094 10,233 Retained earnings Accounts receivable from companies in which Other retained earnings 1,292 1,287 5 participations are held Distributable profit 575 492 Other assets 513 6,054 7,826 5,738 Marketable securities (3) 2,879 485 Provisions (8) Cash and cash equivalents (4) 3,785 2,444 Provisions for pensions and similar obligations 839 720 9,276 19,216 Provisions for taxes 790
    [Show full text]
  • Adroddiad Report
    Adroddiad Report Ymchwiliad a agorwyd ar 15/10/13 Inquiry opened on 15/10/13 Ymweliadau safle a wnaed ar 24/10/13 & Site visits made on 24/10/13 & 8/11/13 8/11/13 gan Emyr Jones BSc(Hons) CEng by Emyr Jones BSc(Hons) CEng MICE MICE MCMI MCMI Arolygydd a benodir gan Weinidogion Cymru an Inspector appointed by the Welsh Ministers Dyddiad: 16/01/2014 Date: 16/01/2014 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 SECTIONS 78 & 79 APPEAL BY RES UK & IRELAND LTD. LAND SURROUNDING BRYN LLYWELYN, LLANLLWNI, PENCADER SA39 9ED COMMONS ACT 2006 SECTIONS 16 & 38 APPLICATIONS BY THE CROWN ESTATE AND RES UK & IRELAND LTD. LAND AT MYNYDD LLANLLWNI AND MYNYDD LLANFIHANGEL RHOS-Y-CORN COMMONS Cyf ffeiliau/File refs: APP/M6825/A/12/2189697, APP/M6825/X/13/515763 & APP/M6825/X/13/515764 www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorate Report APP/M6825/A/12/2189697, APP/M6825/X/13/515763 & APP/M6825/X/13/515764 Contents Page List of abbreviations 4 Case details 6 Preamble 6 Procedural and background matters 7 The site and surroundings 9 Planning policy 10 The proposals 11 Other agreed matters 12 The case for RES UK & Ireland Ltd. 13 The case for Carmarthenshire County Council 60 The case for the Save Mynydd Llanllwni Group 86 The case for Cllr L Davies Evans 99 The case for Llanllwni Community Council 100 The case for Grŵp Blaengwen 101 The case for the Teifi Valley Tourism Association 104 The case for the Llanfihangel Rhos-y-Corn and Llanllwni Mountain 105 Grazing Association The case for the Brechfa Forest Energy Action Group 106 The case for the Brechfa Forest and
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Kentucky Before the Public Service Commission in the Matter Of: Compliance of Kentucky-American ) Water Company
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF: COMPLIANCE OF KENTUCKY-AMERICAN ) WATER COMPANY, AMERICAN WATER WORKS ) COMPANY, RWE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT AND ) THAMES WATER AQUA HOLDINGS GMBH WITH ) THE PROVISIONS OF THE ORDERS ) CASE NO. APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF ) 2002-00277 KENTUCKY-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY TO ) RWE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT AND THAMES ) WATER AQUA HOLDINGS GMBH ) NOTICE OF CONDITION 37 FILING – RWE SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES Come Thames Water Aqua Holdings GmbH, RWE Aktiengesellschaft, American Water Works Company, Inc., Thames Water Aqua U.S. Holdings, Inc. and Kentucky-American Water Company, and herewith give notice, pursuant to Condition 37 of the Commission’s Order dated December 20, 2002, in Case No. 2002-00317, of the filing herewith of the Organizational Chart of RWE Aktiengesellschaft showing all of its subsidiaries and affiliates as of December 31, 2007. Respectfully submitted, Lindsey W. Ingram, Jr. Lindsey W. Ingram III STOLL KEENON OGDEN PLLC 300 West Vine Street, Suite 2100 Lexington, Kentucky 40507 (859) 231-3000 BY: ______________________________________ Counsel for Kentucky-American Water Company, Thames Water Aqua Holdings GmbH, Thames Water Aqua US Holdings, Inc., RWE AG and American Water Works Company, Inc. CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the electronic version of this pleading is a true and accurate copy of the pleading filed in paper medium; that the Petitioners have notified the Commission and the parties in Case No. 2002-00317 by electronic mail on March 31, 2008 that the electronic version of this pleading has been transmitted to the Commission, and that a paper copy has been served by mail upon: Foster Ockerman, Jr., Esq.
    [Show full text]
  • INWG AM Study Wp3a
    Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation and Planning Control Study Work Package 3.1 - Study of Noise and Amplitude Modulation Complaints Received by Local Planning Authorities in England Author: Trevor Sherman Trevor Sherman is an international management consultant currently specialising in senior executive coaching and leadership development training. He has extensive experience of data gathering, analysis, assessment and reporting. Reviewers: John Yelland MA DPhil (Oxon) MInstP FIET MIOA David J Unwin BSc M.Phil FRGS Emeritus Professor in Geography, Birkbeck, University of London Richard Cowen LLB ©2015 Trevor Sherman & Chris Heaton-Harris. No part of this Study may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise except through the prior written permission of the authors. Limit of liability: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this Study, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of its contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. Page 1 of 40 10 February 2015 Work Package 3.1 – Study of Noise & AM Complaints received by LPAs in England CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 2 Foreword......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work
    Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Wind Turbine Amplitude Modulation & Planning Control Study Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review Author: Sarah Large MA(Cantab) MSc Dip (IoA) MIOA Reviewed by Mike Stigwood © 2015 MAS Environmental Ltd & Chris Heaton-Harris. No part of this Study may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise except through the prior written permission of the authors. Limit of liability: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this Study, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of its contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation Page 1 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Scope 4 3 Introduction and methodology 5 4 Review of AM 2004 - 2006 6 5 Review of AM 2006 - 2008 7 6 Review of AM 2009 - 2012 10 7 Review of AM 2013 - present 21 8 Conclusion 31 Appendix A - Wind Farm sites known to have caused complaints, including AM complaints. 32 Abbreviations AM Amplitude Modulation EAM Excessive (Enhanced) Amplitude Modulation DBJRG IoA Institute of Acoustics IoA GPG Institute of Acoustics Good Practice Guide NAM Normal Amplitude Modulation OAM Other Amplitude Modulation RUK RenewableUK, the wind industry trade association SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Page 2 of 34 24 August 2015 Work Package 2.2 - AM Evidence Review 1 Executive Summary 1.1 This review focuses primarily on audible amplitude modulation (AM).
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht 2012 Eckdat En 2012 Auf Einen Blick
    GESCHÄFTSBERICHT 2012 ECKDAT EN 2012 AUF EINEN BLICK • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 6,4 Mrd. € • Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis: 2,5 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2 € je Aktie • Verschuldungsfaktor unverändert bei 3,5 • Prognose 2013: Betriebliches Ergebnis in der Größenordnung von 5,9 Mrd. € RWE-Konzern 2012 2011 + /− in % Stromerzeugung Mrd. kWh 227,1 205,7 10,4 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 277,8 294,6 − 5,7 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 306,8 322,2 − 4,8 Außenumsatz Mio. € 53.227 51.686 3,0 EBITDA Mio. € 9.314 8.460 10,1 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 6.416 5.814 10,4 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 2.230 3.024 − 26,3 Nettoergebnis/Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.306 1.806 − 27,7 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.457 2.479 − 0,9 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 12,0 10,9 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 9,0 8,5 - Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.589 1.286 23,6 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.637 53.279 0,7 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 4.395 5.510 − 20,2 Investitionen Mio. € 5.544 7.072 − 21,6 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio. € 5.081 6.353 − 20,0 In Finanzanlagen Mio. € 463 719 − 35,6 Free Cash Flow Mio. € − 686 − 843 18,6 Zahl der im Umlauf befindlichen Aktien (Jahresdurchschnitt) Tsd. Stück 614.480 538.971 14,0 Ergebnis je Aktie € 2,13 3,35 − 36,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis je Aktie € 4,00 4,60 − 13,0 Dividende je Aktie € 2,001 2,00 - 31.12.2012 31.12.2011 Nettoschulden des RWE-Konzerns Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1
    Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1 January 2010 www.segen.co.uk www.lancs.ac.uk/windturbines © SEGEN LTD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 1 Preface i. General Notes Project Title: Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Report Title: Lancaster University Wind Turbine Project Environmental Statement Volume 1 Date of Issue: January 2010 Office Address: Segen Ltd. City Lab 4-6 Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PP Produced by: Planning Manager Miss J Peaks Authorised by: Director Mr R Horn This Environmental Statement Volume 1, Environmental Statement Appendices Volume 2 and its Non Technical Summary Volume 3 will be made publically available at the following locations detailed below; • Lancaster City Council Office, Palatine Hall, Dalton Square, Lancaster , LA1 1PW • Lancaster Library, Market Square, Lancaster, LA1 1HY • www.lancs.ac.uk/windturbines Copies of the Environmental Statement including the Non Technical Summary can also be obtained from Segen Ltd. by calling on 01524 590590 or emailing [email protected] or writing to: Segen Ltd. City Lab 4-6 Dalton Square Lancaster LA1 1PP The full Environmental Statement can be purchased for £150.00 per copy. Alternatively full sets of the documents are available free of charge as Adobe Acrobat files on CD-ROM. I © SEGEN LTD ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 1 Glossary ii Abbreviations Abbreviation Description AOD Above Ordnance Datum AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BBC British Broadcasting Corporation BREEAM Building Research
    [Show full text]
  • European Wind Farms
    Gartefjellet (40MW,20) KJØLLEFJORD VIND AS Havøygavlen (40MW,16) Arctic Wind (StatoilHydro) Kjollefjord (39.1MW,17) Kjøllefjord Vind AS (Statkraft) Sandhaugen (1.5MW,1) Norsk Miljøkraft FoU AS Kvalnes, Andøya (0.4MW,1) Andøya Energi AS Hovden, Vesterålen (0.4MW,1) Vesterålskraft Produksjon AS Enontekiö (1.5MW,3) Tunturituuli Oy Nygårdsfjellet I (6.9MW,3) Nordkraft Vind AS Hammarøya vindmølle (0.3MW,1) Nordmøre Energiverk AS Olos 3 (1.8MW,3) Tunturituuli Oy Viscaria (5.4MW,6) Biegg-al mai/Suorva (0.6MW,1) Aapua (10.5MW,7) Hornberg (10MW,5) Bolungarvik Uljabuouda (30MW,10) Skellefteå Kraft Blaiken (300MW,100) Skellefteå Kraft Kemi 1 (0.9MW,3) Kemin Tuulivoimapuisto Oy Storön (0.85MW,1) Kemi (30MW,10) PVO Innopower Oy Kemi (3MW,1) Haminan Energia Oy Ajos (Kemi) 1+2 (24MW,8) Pohjolan Voima Ajos T5 (30MW,10) PVO Innopower Oy Jokkmokksliden (25MW,10) Skellefteå Kraft Kuivaniemi (7MW,8) VAPOn tuulivoima Oy Vatunki 6 (2MW,1) VAPOn tuulivoima Oy Kuivamatala 1 (2.25MW,3) VAPOn tuulivoima Oy Laitakari (0.5MW,3) Iin Energia Oy Ii (1.5MW,2) Iin Energia Oy Ii Laitakari (1MW,1) Dragaliden (24MW,12) Svevind Bondön (35MW,14) Global Green Energy Huikku (0.5MW,1) Hornberget (10MW,5) Jämtkraft AB Vattenfall sähköntuotanto Oy Klimpfjäll (2.7MW,3) Vattenfall AB Hailuoto (1.6MW,4) Spawer Kraft Ab Oulu (4MW,2) PVO Innopower Oy Marjaniemi 3 (0.5MW,1) Riutunkari T4 (3MW,3) Vihreäsaari T2 (3MW,1) Vattenfall sähköntuotanto Oy PVO Innopower Oy PVO Innopower Oy Oulunsalo (10.3MW,6) PVO Innopower Oy Lumijoki (0.66MW,1) Lumituuli Oy Routunkari (0.66MW,1) Lumituuli Oy
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of Wind Farms
    Wind Speeds at United Kingdom Wind Farms with known locations Data collected from thewindpower.net and UL's Windnavigator and compiled by Wind Harvest Classification: Public Update: 19 June 2020 Contact: Kevin Wolf, [email protected] 1. Wind speeds will vary across wind farms. This initial estimate used Note only one lat-long per wind farm. 2. This table has an unknown accuracy level. 3. Winds at 20m agl will on average be 0.3 m/s faster than at 15m agl. Total Projected Total Wind Total known % of MW over 6.5 Farms MW over >6.5m/s by Total Wind Farms in m/s at 15m analyzed 6.5m/s at total at 15m Country (MWs) agl (MW) 15m agl agl 13,751 4,478 8,289 2,699 32.6% Wind Farm Name Power (kW) # of Turbines Wind at 80m Wind at 15m agl m/s agl m/s Fair Isle 180 3 8.91 Spurness - Repower 10,000 5 10.28 8.75 Spurness Wind Farm 8,250 3 10.28 8.75 Bu Farm 2,700 3 10.47 8.62 Cemmaes 15,300 18 9.02 8.53 Pentland Road (incorporating13,800 Beinn Mholach)6 10.44 8.34 Slieve Kirk 27,600 12 10.12 8.24 Black Hill 28,600 22 9.89 8.22 Burgar Hill 5,000 2 10.32 8.15 Srondoire Community Windfarm6,000 3 9.59 8.14 Barns of Ayre 2,700 3 9.96 8.12 Ben Aketil 23,000 10 10.03 8.11 Curryfree 15,000 6 9.87 8.07 Novar 17,000 34 9.67 8.01 Hare Hill Extension 29,750 35 9.72 7.85 Kelburn (Green Hill) 28,000 14 9.71 7.81 Ardrossan 24,000 12 9.46 7.81 Ardrossan Extension 6,000 3 9.46 7.81 Carrickatane 20,700 9 9.39 7.8 Beinneun 85,000 25 8.66 7.8 Loch Sminig 2,700 3 9.96 7.78 Millennium (Glenmoriston)40,000 16 9.16 7.76 Millennium (Glenmoriston)15,000 Extension 2 6 8.17
    [Show full text]