DOCSLIB.ORG

Patrick Hart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Patrick Hart A Prolegomenon to the Study of Paul by Patrick Hart A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Religious Studies University of Alberta © Patrick Hart, 2018 ABSTRACT The apostle Paul’s significance to both early Christian history and Christian theology is undisputed. Indeed, Paul is second to none but Jesus in this regard—or as Adolf Deissmann puts it, “[f]rom the broadest historical standpoint Jesus appears as the One, and Paul as the first after the One.” Yet despite the small mountain of books on Paul, there seemingly remains a persistent failure to generate a cogent and compelling understanding of his thought. Granted, this concern is decidedly more acute in Pauline scholarship than it is among everyday readers of the New Testament. But Paul’s eminence in Christian history and theology ought to dictate otherwise. Indeed, given his ubiquitous significance in Christianity, all readers of Paul would do well to reflect not only upon the multifarious Pauls that we encounter, but even more important, the various considerations that condition any understanding of him, regardless of whether one views him as an impenetrable figure. Occasioned by this concern, this study is intended to serve as a type of prolegomenon to the study of Paul. Specifically, this study examines foundational assumptions that ground each and every reading or interpretation of the famous apostle to the gentiles. Such an examination touches on several topics, invoking issues pertaining to truth, hermeneutics, canonicity, historiography, pseudonymity, literary genres, and authority. Moreover, this study is guided by an underlying thesis, namely, that every encounter with the Paul of the New Testament is conditioned by a kind of pre-understanding of Paul (or a proto-Paulusbild), which filters and interprets the Pauline data. Indeed, it is this pre-understanding of Paul that fundamentally determines how we use the New Testament data in the course of constructing our understandings of Paul. Thus, our pre-understandings of Paul are integrally linked to what this study refers to as “Pauline Archimedean points”—fixed points of reference that establish the measure for ii constructing any interpretation of Paul. Building on this premise, this study aims to interrogate the assorted issues that relate to and inform the formation of these Pauline Archimedean points. In doing so, my underlying goal is relatively modest: to urge Pauline scholars, and for that matter Pauline readers of any persuasion, to engage in a modicum of self-reflection over the “positive prejudices” that shape all of our efforts to comprehend or reconstruct Paul. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My wife has repeatedly needled me about how disturbingly long my time in graduate studies has been. That needling is justified. But regardless of how long it has taken, I know that I never would have made it two this point if I had not happened to come across two brilliant professors and kind individuals as an undergraduate student. The first of these is Dr. Willi Braun, who I first encountered in an “Introduction to the New Testament” course. Dr. Braun instilled in me a way of thinking and inquiring about the New Testament (and religion in general) that was entirely new to me. That class led to further courses with Dr. Braun, who for years has allowed me to benefit from his wisdom, kindness, and congenial yet rigorous scholarly “attitude.” I am tremendously fortunate to have had such an outstanding supervisor and intellectual mentor, and am indebted to him in a way that can never be repaid. A second pivotal figure for me has been Dr. Robert Burch, who I first encountered in his (famous) “Existentialism” course. Over the years, I’ve gained a greater appreciation for how much the material in that course continues to resonate in my thinking. But beyond that, this course introduced me to the matchless oratory skills of Dr. Burch, a living and breathing rosetta stone for continental philosophy. Having been acquainted with him now for some time, I also feel confident in saying that his intellectual prowess and penchant for incisive criticism have, unlike his hockey skills, only grown over the years. In addition to these two, I would also like to thank Dr. Lorne Zelyck for serving on my supervisory committee, and for his valuable criticisms and insights. While I know that our conceptual matrices very much differ, I am exceedingly grateful for his input, and am truly fortunate to have had him as a supervisory committee member. iv I also must extend my deepest thanks to those involved in my examination committees: at my candidacy examination, Dr. Francis Landy (chair), Dr. John Kitchen, and Dr. Jeffrey Dudiak, and at my thesis examination, Dr. Ryan Dunch (chair), Dr. William Arnal, Dr. Zeba Crook, and Dr. John Harris. There are many others who have in some manner or another helped me or influenced me along my long academic journey in religious studies at the University of Alberta. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Wayne Litke, Dr. Charles Barbour, and again, Dr. Francis Landy. I am also grateful to Barb Baker, Janey Kennedy, and Nicola DiNicola for their administrative help, and to David Sulz for his always cheerful assistance in research-related matters (in spite of our more competitive relationship as hockey adversaries). Outside of the field of religious studies, I must thank Dr. Paul Paton, who has provided consistent academic encouragement over the years, and sound career-related advice at critical junctures. I am also thankful to everyone at Jackie Handerek & Forester, particularly the partners, John Jackie, David Handerek, and Jeff Forester, who permitted me to pursue doctoral studies during my employment. I am tremendously fortunate to have had such wonderful peers throughout my time as a doctoral student: Dr. Peter Sabo, Kristian Klippenstein, Dr. Ian Wilson, Dr. Clayton Bench, Rev. Rick Van Manen, Allan Wright, John Parish, and Michael Gillingham are all wonderful colleagues. I also owe very special thanks to Dr. Mark Wheller and Dr. Glen Fairen, whose own doctoral interests intersected at certain points with mine, resulting in much productive discussion (perhaps more for me than them). I am also grateful for their willingness to review drafts of my work and provide helpful comments and editorial suggestions along the way. v Outside of academia, I am lucky to have so many great friends who are in one way or another also owed much thanks. While I cannot name them all, I would be remiss if I did not make mention of three individuals: Preston Norris, Jason Norris, and Everett Norris. The contents of this thesis are in no small part rooted in the countless discussions that we have had over the years on topics relating to religion, philosophy, early Christianity, and especially Paul. Last, but not least, I owe an immense amount of gratitude to my parents, brothers, and other family who have supported me throughout my lengthy academic journey. I am especially thankful to our children, Kylan, Logan, and Rory, for all the (usually) wonderful distractions that they provide. Above all, I cannot thank my wife Angela enough. She has exhibited unending patience and support throughout the many years of my life as a student. I love you. And don’t worry: I am pretty, pretty, sure that I will not be pursuing another degree. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 The Familiar Paul? ................................................................................................................... 1 Mapping the Study .................................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................ 17 “IN A MIRROR DIMLY” ......................................................................................................... 17 “Our Knowledge is Imperfect…”: The Historical Paul, the Real Paul, and Paulusbilder17 “…For Now We See in a Mirror Dimly”: (Self) Reflections on the Study of Paul ........... 26 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................ 37 CANONS AND COLLECTIONS: CONSIDERATIONS ON THE FORMATION OF A NORMATIVE PAULINE ARCHIVE ...................................................................................... 37 The Paul of Canon .................................................................................................................. 37 The Concept of Canon ............................................................................................................ 40 The Formation of a Pauline Canon ....................................................................................... 44 The Snowball Theory ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BNTC Programme 18-011 AUG18.Indd
    British New Testament Conference St Mary’s University, Twickenham Thursday 6th to Saturday 8th September 2018 18/0011 British New Testament Conference Programme | 1 Conference Information Publishers’ Display The publishers’ display is located in the Dolce Vita café, which is where tea and coffee will be served. Departure All bedrooms must be vacated by 9am. Luggage can be securely stored in classroom G1 (close to reception). Keys are to be deposited in the key box located on the wall next to the Security Lodge. Packed lunches are available if pre-booked on day of arrival. Wi-Fi Access Residential guests will receive login details as part of their key pack on arrival. Non-residential conference guests should request a temporary login upon registration. Please note that Eduroam is available on campus. Contact details Katherine Colbrook Conference and Events Manager T: 020 8240 4311 E: [email protected] Professor Chris Keith Chair of the Organising Committee T: 07595 089923 E: [email protected] Security Lodge/Security Emergency T: 020 8240 4335 / 020 8240 4060 2 | St Mary’s University Twickenham London Programme Overview Thursday 6th September 9am-3pm Early check-in to bedrooms available from 9am to 3pm Reception 11.45am Pre-conference trip to British Library and/or National Gallery Offsite led by Simon Woodman and Michelle Fletcher. Meet point St Mary’s Leaving and returning to St Mary’s Main Reception 3-5.30pm Conference registration, accommodation check-in and coffee (from 3pm) Dolce Vita café 5.30-6.30pm Wine reception
    [Show full text]
  • CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE of ALBERTA a Critical
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ALBERTA A Critical Consideration of Three Fulfillment Citations in the Gospel According to Matthew by Daniel Brister A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN BIBLICAL AND CHRISTIAN STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES EDMONTON, ALBERTA OCTOBER, 2012 © Daniel Brister 2012 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-86270-4 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-86270-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • David Trobisch and David Parker on the Origin of the New Testament, the Historical Jesus, and How Manuscripts Can Reveal What Texts Conceal
    David Trobisch and David Parker on the Origin of the New Testament, the Historical Jesus, and How Manuscripts Can Reveal What Texts Conceal Tom Dykstra I grew up with a picture of Paul traveling through Asia and Europe, founding congregations, counseling and teaching the men and women who had given their life to Jesus. If he could not visit them, he sent letters. When Paul died, his letters were kept as treasures. Each church that had received one of his letters saved it, had it read during worship services, and exchanged copies of the letter with other congregations close by. Later the congregations tried to complete their collection. But this view does not match the uniformity of manuscript evidence. 1 --David Trobisch It is even more remarkable that attempts to reconstruct the supposed document 'Q' (the lost collection used by both Matthew and Luke postulated by those who argue that Matthew and Luke are independent) use text-critical terminology to describe their activities. However, since all they are doing is making selections from a twentieth-century printed text, which does not even presume to provide confidently the text of the four-Gospel collection, never mind that of the independent first-century texts, this use of language must be dismissed as illusory. 2 --David Parker Modern scholarship has produced detailed biographies of Paul, massive multi-volume inquiries into “the historical Jesus,” and mountains of exegetical literature that claims to extract the author’s meaning from each word of each New Testament book. Typically, this literature analyzes the scriptural texts with little reference to actual manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Geding Om De Historiciteit Van Jezus: Edward Van Der Kaaij in Perspectief
    BERT JAN LIETAERT PEERBOLTE Het geding om de historiciteit van Jezus: Edward van der Kaaij in perspectief THE DEBATE ON THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS: EDWARD VAN DER KAAIJ IN PERSPECTIVE Rev. Edward van der Kaaij recently published a book that treats Jesus as a mythical figure. The origin of narratives about Jesus would lie in a historicizing of this myth by the earliest Christians. Van der Kaaij thus revives the old position defended by, among others, Arthur Drews (1909), but does so without any new arguments. This contribution analyses this newly published book, with reference to similar discussions around the turn of the 20th century, and argues that Van der Kaaij’s perception is wrong: the ideas of the Dutch Radicals (the Hollandse Radicalen) were not ignored, but simply rejected on good grounds. Since there is no new evidence to take into account, there is no need to reopen the discussion. In diverse kerkelijke en andere media heeft de publicatie van een boek door ds. Edward van der Kaaij de nodige aandacht getrokken.1 Van der Kaaij is tot het inzicht gekomen dat Jezus nimmer als historische figuur bestaan heeft, maar een mythisch verzinsel is van het vroegste christendom. Volgens Van der Kaaij hebben de eerste christenen Egyptische tradities over Horus gehisto- riseerd en is aldus Jezus van Nazaret tot stand gekomen. Het christendom, al- dus Van der Kaaij, berust op een mythe en niet op geschiedenis. Deze these is niet bepaald nieuw, maar desondanks heeft het boek in en buiten kerkelijk Ne- derland de nodige discussie losgemaakt. Het Nederlands Theologisch Tijd- schrift is dan een geschikte plek om die discussie in een historisch en weten- schappelijk perspectief te plaatsen.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Theme: Theology and Church E V
    ERT cover 30-1 22/11/05 14:04 Page 1 CONTENTS Theme: Theology and Church E V Editorial – Theology and Church page 3 A N Enabling Congregations to become G E Theological Communities L I C FRANK REES A page 4 L R E The Rise of the Professional Doctor of Ministry V I E Degree in the ATS W DONALD L. TUCKER O page 13 F T H Learning from the African Experience: Bediako and E Critical Contexualisation O L ALAN THOMSON O G page 31 Y V Biblical Hermeneutics in Relation to Conventions of O Articles and book reviews reflecting L Language Use in Africa U M global evangelical theology for the purpose JIM HARRIES E page 49 3 of discerning the obedience of faith 0 , Whither Evangelical Theology? The Work of Veli-Matti N Kärkkäinen as a Case Study of Contemporary Trajectories O 1 MOS ONG , A Y J a n page 60 u a r Toward an Ethic of Shared Responsibility in y 2 Galatians 5:13-15 0 0 PETER MAGETO 6 page 86 Book Reviews page 95 Volume 30 No. 1 January 2006 PATERNOSTER PATERNOSTER PERIODICALS PERIODICALS Evangelical Review of Theology EDITOR: DAVID PARKER Volume 30 • Number 1 • January 2006 Articles and book reviews reflecting global evangelical theology for the purpose of discerning the obedience of faith Published by for WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE Theological Commission PATERNOSTER PERIODICALS ISSN: 0144-8153 Volume 30 No. 1 January 2006 Copyright © 2006 World Evangelical Alliance Theological Commission Editor David Parker Committee The Executive Committee of the WEA Theological Commission Dr Rolf Hille, Executive Chair Editorial Policy The articles in the Evangelical Review of Theology reflect the opinions of the authors and reviewers and do not necessarily represent those of the Editor or the Publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lady Margaret's Professorship of Divinity
    THE LADY MARGARET’S PROFESSORSHIP OF DIVINITY FACULTY OF DIVINITY 1 The Professorship Background The Lady Margaret’s Professorship (founded in 1502) is the oldest endowed chair in the University of Cambridge and one of four endowed chairs in the Faculty of Divinity. The last four holders, Charles F. D. Moule, Morna Hooker, Graham Stanton, and Judith Lieu have all been international leaders in the field of New Testament studies. The Faculty Board sees continued strength in this area as central for the future strategy of the Faculty. Selection Criteria Candidates will be considered for the Professorship on the basis of the following selection criteria, which they should address in their application. An outstanding research record of international stature in the field of New Testament studies. The vision, leadership experience and enthusiasm to build on current strengths in maintaining and developing a leading research presence, and an established record in attracting research grant support to further this development. The ability to further the academic planning and strategic development of New Testament studies in the University (especially through fostering links with colleagues in the Department of Classics and the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies) and, where appropriate, more widely within the UK. The ability to manage and interact effectively with staff and students at all levels. An enthusiastic commitment to the recruitment, training and mentoring of the next generation of researchers, including undergraduates, research students, and postdoctoral research fellows Candidates will hold a PhD or equivalent postgraduate qualification. Lady Margaret’s Professorship of Divinity Page 1 of 6 2 The Faculty of Divinity Full details of the work of the Faculty, including the Tripos (for undergraduates) and the M.Phil.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology and Ethics in 1 Peter. Paraenetic Strategies for Christian Character Formation
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament • 2. Reihe Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey Mitherausgeber / Associate Editors Friedrich Avemarie • Judith Gundry-Volf Martin Hengel • Otfried Hofius • Hans-Josef Klauck 209 J. de Waal Dryden Theology and Ethics in 1 Peter Paraenetic Strategies for Christian Character Formation Mohr Siebeck J. DEWAAI. DRYDEN.born 1967; B.E.E., M.Div..Th.M.: 2004 Ph.D. (Cambridge): since then working with L'Abri Fellowship in Greatham, England. ISBN 3-16-148910-1 ISBN-13 978-3-16-148910-5 ISSN 0340-9570 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen /um Neuen Testament. 2. Reihe) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie: detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnh.ddb.de. © 2006 by Mohr Siebcck.Tübingen. Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Held in Rottenburg/N. Printed in Germany. Preface No man is an island, not even the postgraduate research student. No matter how much of a project like this one is the result of personal force of will, the fact remains that it is also the result of a nexus of human connections, each making uniquely different contributions to the whole. But since my name alone accompanies this work, I owe a debt to acknowledge the myriad of support that fostered this thesis on so many fronts.
    [Show full text]
  • Church “Fathers”: Polycarp
    Church History and Evidences Notes: Church “Fathers”: Polycarp I.Church “fathers” and their writings: Polycarp A. Polycarp of Smyrna 1. Polycarp of Smyrna (c. 69 – c. 155) was a Christian bishop of Smyrna (now İzmir in Turkey). 2. According to Eusebius (260-340AD) supposedly quoting Irenaeus (130- 202AD), Polycrates of Ephesus (130-196AD) cited the example of Polycarp in defense of local practices during the Quartodeciman Controversy. Polycarp supposedly tried and failed to persuade Pope Anicetus to have the West celebrate Passover on the 14th of Nisan, as in the Eastern calendar. 3. Around A.D. 155, the Smyrnans of his town demanded Polycarp's execution as a Christian, and he died a martyr. The story of his martyrdom describes how the fire built around him would not burn him, and that when he was stabbed to death, so much blood issued from his body that it quenched the flames around him. Polycarp is recognized as a saint in both the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. 4. Both Irenaeus, who as a young man heard Polycarp speak, and Tertullian recorded that Polycarp had been a disciple of John the Apostle. 5. There are two chief sources of information concerning the life of Polycarp: the letter of the Smyrnaeans recounting the martyrdom of Polycarp and the passages in Irenaeus' Adversus Haereses. Other sources are the epistles of Ignatius, which include one to Polycarp and another to the Smyrnaeans, and Polycarp's own letter to the Philippians. In 1999, some third to 6th-century Coptic fragments about Polycarp were also published.
    [Show full text]
  • La Investigación Sobre La Vida De Jesús En El Cambio Del Siglo '" 381 XIX
    CLÁSICOS DE LA CIENCIA BÍBLICA IV** INVESTIGACIÓN SOBRE LA VIDA DE JESÚS ALBERT SCHWEITZER. Director: L. ALONSO SCHÓKEL Edición publicada en 2002 EDICEPi COLECCIÓN CLÁSICOS DE LA CIENCIA BÍBLICA N" 4** Título original: GESCHICHTE DER LEBEN JESU FORSCHUNG © J.C.B. MOHR (PauI Síebeck) Tübingen Traducido por: Juan Miguel Díaz Rodelas PRINTED IN SPAIN r.S.B.N.: 84-7050-685-4 Obra completa r.S.B.N.: 84-7050-682-X Segunda parte Depósito Legal: V-2859-1990 © by EDICEP C.B. Almirante Cadarso, 11 - 46005 VALENCIA (España) Tfno.: (34) 96 395 2045 - 96 395 72 93 Fax: (34) 96 395 2297 E-mail: [email protected] • www.edicep.com IMPRIME: eVADA Litogmfía S.L. VALENCIA (España) ÍNDICE Primera Parte Prólogo a la primera edición .. '" 7 Prólogo a la segunda edición 9 Prólogo a la sexta edición , 13 INTRODUCCIÓN 25 Naturaleza de la obra de Schweitzer 27 Las alternativas de la interpretación en el siglo XX 28 La Escuela de la Interpretación teológica 37 El impacto de la obra de Schweitzer en otros campos 40 1. El problema 49 n. Hermann Samuel Reimarus 63 III. Vidas de Jesús del primer racionalismo 79 IV. Primeras Vidas de Jesús noveladas 91 V. Racionalismo evolucionado. Paulus 103 VI. Los Epígonos del racionalismo 115 VII. David Friedrich Strauss. Su vida y su destino 127 Vll1. La Primera Vida de JeslÍs de D. F. Strauss 139 IX. Defensores y detractorcs dcllibro 159 X. La hipótesis de Marco 183 XI. Bruno Bauer: La primera Vida de Jesús fruto del escepticismo 201 XII. Nuevas Vidas de Jesús noveladas 223 XIII.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORDER of the BOOKS of the NEW TESTAMENT Greg Goswell* I
    JETS 53/2 (June 2010) 225–41 THE ORDER OF THE BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT greg goswell* This article follows up two earlier articles on the order of the biblical books in the Hebrew and Greek arrangements of the OT canon.1 The assumption behind all three studies is that the placement or location of a biblical book relative to other books influences a reader’s view of the book. The present study deals with the location of the books of the NT, with “location” defined as physical propinquity in the anthology of Scripture.2 Readerly habit views enjambment as a clue that significant relations are to be discerned between a particular book and its neighbors in the library of canonical books. The reader presumes that material that is juxtaposed is related in some way in meaning, and this habit of readers forms the basis of the following analysis. The assumption is that a book is more closely related to books next to it or nearby, and less closely related to books placed far from it. This study is not a historical investigation into the formation of the canon of the NT,3 but an exploration of the hermeneutical implications of the order of biblical books, with book order viewed as an aspect of the paratext of Christian Scripture. i. a parallel structure to the old testament? The overriding principle of organization discerned within the NT canon is the ordering of the books according to an ancient perception of genre, so that they are grouped as Gospels, Acts, letters, and Revelation (apocalypse).
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download the New Testament Ebook Free Download
    THE NEW TESTAMENT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nicholas King | 655 pages | 01 Dec 2004 | Kevin Mayhew Ltd | 9781844173242 | English | Suffolk, United Kingdom The New Testament PDF Book The first translation was made by at least the 3rd century into the Sahidic dialect cop sa. Word UK Ltd. Although a number of Christians have thought that church councils determined what books were to be included in the biblical canons, a more accurate reflection of the matter is that the councils recognized or acknowledged those books that had already obtained prominence from usage among the various early Christian communities. Introduction to the New Testament, Volume 2. Main article: Canonical gospels. They contain similar accounts of the events in Jesus's life and his teaching, due to their literary interdependence. Resources for Biblical Study. Start Publishing LLC. For full treatment, see biblical literature: Conditions aiding the formation of the canon. In many respects it was merely a revision of the Old Latin. No Codex Siniaticus. A brief summary of the acts was read at and accepted by the Council of Carthage and the Council of Carthage Jehovah's Witnesses Latter Day Saint movement. See media help. Ehrman , "These scribal additions are often found in late medieval manuscripts of the New Testament, but not in the manuscripts of the earlier centuries. A text-type referred to as the " Caesarean text-type " and thought to have included witnesses such as Codex Koridethi and minuscule , can today be described neither as "Caesarean" nor as a text-type as was previously thought. For this reason, the Bohairic translation can be helpful in the reconstruction of the early Greek text of the New Testament.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRISTOPHER EVANS Christopher Francis Evans 1909–2012
    CHRISTOPHER EVANS Christopher Francis Evans 1909–2012 THREE YOUNG MEN—two Anglican, one Methodist—studying Theology at Cambridge at various times in the 1930s were destined, though they did not know it, to become the three most influential British New Testament scholars of their generation. All were to become Fellows of the British Academy. The first was Charles Francis Digby Moule (always known as ‘Charlie’), who read classics at Emmanuel College, but then studied Theology at Ridley Hall in preparation for ordination; he became Lady Margaret’s Professor of Divinity in 1951. Youngest of the three was Charles Kingsley Barrett (known by his friends as ‘Kingsley’), who stud- ied mathe matics at Pembroke before switching to Theology and preparing for the Methodist ministry at Wesley House; he spent almost all his teach- ing career in Durham, where he became Professor of New Testament.1 In between them, and overlapping with Charlie Moule, was Christopher Francis Evans, who was for a short time Lightfoot Professor at Durham before moving to the University of London, as Professor of New Testament at King’s College. ‘Overlapping with’, and perhaps overshadowed by, Charlie Moule, who had gone up to Cambridge a year before him. In later life Christopher would relate how, as an undergraduate, he had ventured to enter for vari- ous university prizes, but would inevitably recognise Charlie’s slight figure at another desk in the examination room, whereupon his heart would 1 Both have been the subject of memoirs in this series: W. Horbury, ‘Charles Francis Digby Moule, 1908–2007’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 161, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows, VIII, 281–301; J.
    [Show full text]