Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 VISION
Striving towards a healthy and sustainable relationship between the natural environment and the community’s use of land and water resources.
MISSION
Glenelg Hopkins CMA provides regional strategic direction to achieve integrated catchment management in partnership with the government and community.
Disclaimer: Whilst every effort is made to provide a high quality publication, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA does not give any guarantees , undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up-to-date nature of the information provided in the document, and therefore disclaims all liability from error, loss or other consequence that may arise from reliance on information in this publication. ISBN: 075 941 1085 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005
Vision & Mission Statement 2
GLENELG HOPKINS CMA 4 Who We Are 5 Our Region 5 2004/2005 Highlights 6 Chairman’s Report 7 Board 8 Chief Executive Officer’s Report 9 Waterways Report 10 Waterways Implementation Committee 11 Land & Biodiversity Report 12 Land & Biodiversity Implementation Committee 13
KEY INTEGRATION TOOLS 14 Glenelg Hopkins Regional Catchment Strategy 2003-2007 15 1. Strategic Planning 16 CASE STUDY: Remote sensing of native vegetation 17 CASE STUDY: River health - a first in Victoria 17 2. Regional Partnerships 18 CASE STUDY: EnviroNet Conference 19 CASE STUDY: Visionary wins prestigious award 19 3. Onground Works 20 CASE STUDY: Protection through partnerships 21 CASE STUDY: High praise for Glenthompson 21 4. Community Engagement & Capacity Building 22 CASE STUDY: Grange Burn wetland a ‘showcase’ 25 CASE STUDY: Weed eradication a success 26 CASE STUDY: Stefano shows how 27 5. Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting 27 MAP: The health of our waterways 28 MAP: Key projects 30
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 32 Corporate Governance 33 Reporting Requirements 35 Organisational Framework 35
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AT A GLANCE 37
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 03 Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority WHO WE ARE
The Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is responsible for co-ordinating (Glenelg Hopkins CMA) was established in July, 1997, under the natural resource management within the catchment. It takes Water Act 1989 and the Catchment and Land Protection Act an integrated, whole-of-catchment approach to its activities 1994 and reports to the Minister for Environment and Minister by combining strategic planning with co-ordination for all for Water, the Hon. J. Thwaites, MP. The annual reporting natural resources. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is an important requirements are embodied in the Financial Management link between the government and the community, particularly Act 1994 and Catchment Land Protection Act 1994. the regional community’s voice on land and water management issues.
OUR REGION
Lying south of the Great Dividing Range, the Glenelg Hopkins Three of the most important industries in South West Victoria - region contains areas of scenic beauty, magnificent and agriculture, fisheries and tourism - depend on the maintenance dramatic coastline, superb national parks and rich biodiversity. of a healthy natural resource base. There is an abundance of arable land, secure surface water The region has three major river drainage basins - the Hopkins, storages, large reserves of underground water and a broad Glenelg and Portland Coast. The lower section of the Glenelg agricultural production base. River is heritage listed for its environmental significance. Salt- The region attracts large numbers of people to its world-class wedge estuaries at the mouth of rivers entering the sea are tourist attractions and boasts a variety of educational and environmentally significant. Extensive wetlands are a feature of research institutions. One of the world’s great deepwater ports the region and provide significant habitat for native is located in Portland and the region is strategically located biodiversity. The region contains substantial reserves of with excellent road access to Melbourne and Adelaide. groundwater with varying salinities. Three groundwater systems The region covers about 2.6 million hectares and extends from underlie the catchment - the Otway, Murray and Highland - Ballarat in the Central Highlands of Victoria, west to the South with other shallow local aquifers in existence. Australian border and south to the coast. The southern two The healthy and productive soils of the region are a major thirds of the region are characterised by flat volcanic plains natural asset and support not only native vegetation but a while the northern third is dominated by the Grampians, the world-scale agricultural sector. Dundas Tablelands and the Black Ranges. Major cities and The coastal areas of the catchment have no parallel. Towering towns include Warrnambool, Hamilton, Portland, Ballarat, cliffs, extensive dune systems and unique inter-tidal areas Ararat, Casterton, Coleraine, Port Fairy and Beaufort. The support a variety of species and represent a world-class tourist boundaries of the region include marine and coastal waters out attraction. to the State limit of 5.5 kilometres. The Glenelg Hopkins region is a truly unique and diverse area of The region contains a range of natural assets in the form of its Australia. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA strives to maintain and biodiversity, waterways and wetlands, soils, forests and coastal protect this region through its vision and mission. areas. These natural assets support a unique quality of life.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 05
Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority
2004/2005 HIGHLIGHTS
• The Minister for Environment and Minister for Water, the Hon. John Thwaites, MP, launches the Glenelg Hopkins CMA River Health Strategy - the first in Victoria.
• Some 447 Partnership Projects are created, involving 169 kilometres of waterway protection, 802 hectares of revegetation, 616 hectares of remnant vegetation protection and 432 hectares of wetlands protection or enhancement.
• One of the largest community partnership projects in the Glenelg Hopkins catchment - the Grange Burn wetland Stage 1 - is commissioned.
• An examination of community engagement is undertaken, leading to a comprehensive Governance and Committee Structure Review.
• The Glenelg Hopkins CMA co-ordinates a pilot community- driven integrated sub-catchment action plan in the Balmoral area. Known as Upper Glenelg CARES (Community, Agriculture, Recreation, Environment and Sustainability), the plan is being developed by a community committee and key stakeholders.
• The third Environmental Achievement Awards recognising the exemplary work of individuals, groups and organisations in environmental management and protection in South West Victoria attracts widespread interest.
• Glenelg Hopkins EnviroNet - a partnership and conduit for • Glenelg Hopkins CMA Partnership project. communications between groups/organisations with an (Photo courtesy Peter Waldron) interest in natural resource management - hosts for the first time a major conference under the theme, ‘Learn, lead, • A highly successful seminar series designed to connect the inspire… Naturally’. community with the Glenelg River is conducted. The seminars highlight environmental issues confronting the major waterway and various management works.
• The formation of the South West Monitoring Network delivers cost savings and provides an avenue for undertaking future monitoring in a partnership approach.
• The Glenelg Hopkins CMA undertakes a critical review of the condition of regional waterways as part of a five-year assessment cycle.
• EnviroNet Conference tour. (Photo courtesy Darren Sheldon)
06 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
I am again pleased to report on a year of ongoing challenges We continue to work with local government and regional and successes for the Glenelg Hopkins CMA. We have water authorities to provide a co-ordinated vision for the continued our strong focus on the need to strengthen linkages, region and are excited by the opportunities that will evolve particularly with the regional community. Integral to this, the from the recently announced formation of Wannon Water, as Board implemented an organisational Governance and the urban water authority to serve South West Victoria. Committee Structure Review. As our organisation has grown, I am pleased that the strong The current structure was adopted in 1997 and it is timely with rapport between staff, the Board and committees has the outcomes of the Victorian Government White Paper Our continued. On behalf of the Board, I express thanks to our Water Our Future that we begin to address these matters. Chief Executive Officer Colin Dunkley and his team for their Final decision and implementation will be undertaken in the efforts in implementing our vision. year ahead. The need to balance the support of research, appropriate Our commitment to the community also is reflected in our governance structures, onground works, monitoring and formal annual survey, which reported continued growth in evaluation mixed with an expectation of short-term results in a personal support for and awareness of the Glenelg Hopkins long-term industry like NRM continues to challenge the Glenelg CMA and its work. Hopkins CMA. Our regional work on raising community awareness was One of the best ways to have maximum resources in these areas supported by a state-wide project involving the 10 CMAs is to keep tight control on corporate costs. I am delighted to funding a feature, titled ‘Restoring our Rivers’, in the report these costs are again below our target of 15 per cent, Melbourne Herald Sun. The feature reached 1.5 million although under expenditure against budget has impacted on households across Victoria. this year’s results. The Board further endorsed this priority by committing to The past year has been particularly demanding for me, with quarterly Board meetings away from our Hamilton increased business commitments. These have necessitated a headquarters for the remainder of the Board’s term. This year greater than normal dependence on the Deputy Chairman we visited Port Fairy, Beaufort and Casterton as well as the Peter Dark and I am most grateful for his support and whole of the Board attending the International Riverfest in commitment. Brisbane for four days. We look forward to the year ahead as a time of consolidation, The Board has continued its commitment to setting the long- but also of new challenges and opportunities that we will meet term direction of our organisation and has been greatly and deliver on for the Glenelg Hopkins region. assisted by the Implementation Committees ably led by Kevin Drinkell and Ross Garton. Equally, our Board Finance and Audit Committees deserve particular acknowledgement for the work they undertake. The addition this year of an internal auditor to assist the Audit Committee has further strengthened the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s governance and business processes. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the work of Mr Richard Walter, the independent Chairman of the Audit Committee. Our annual budget now approaches $15 million. I have expressed concern in the past at the short-term arrangements Mick Murphy for the majority of our funding. Therefore, we were delighted to Chairman receive notification in September, 2004, of $17.2 million over the next three years through the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality and the Natural Heritage Trust. This will enable us to plan within a timeframe much more appropriate to achieving natural resource management outcomes. We will continue to work with industry partners and governments to achieve our long-term objective of three year rolling budgets. We believe with our current governance review and the business and organisational structures and systems we have in place, we are well able to meet the accountability requirements that go with such processes.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 07
Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority
BOARD
Michael Murphy - Chairman Cicely Fenton Michael has been a Board Director of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA for eight Cicely has had more than 40 years farming experience at Branxholme and now years and Chairman for the past five. He resides in Mortlake and operates an resides in Hamilton. She has received several accolades, including a Greening engineering and business development consultancy. He has been keenly Australia Outstanding Achievement Award. Cicely is a conservationist and involved in the community as Mayor and Councillor of Moyne Shire, a site manager for the Eastern Barred Bandicoot Recovery Program. Director of Country Racing Victoria and a Board Member of the South West Water Authority. Current involvements include Director of the Future Hilary Turner Environment Fund (FEF), Director of the Warrnambool Co-operative Society Hilary is a sheep and cattle primary producer at Coleraine. She has many Ltd, member of the Victorian Racing Appeals and Disciplinary Board and years experience in conservation and knowledge skills in remnant vegetation member of the Mortlake College School Council. and indigenous flora. Hilary’s areas of interest include native grasses for commercial use, control of land degradation and salinity – rivers, streams, Peter Dark - Deputy Chairman floodplains and wetlands - and community involvement. Peter and his family run a fine wool enterprise at Mirranatwa. He takes an active interest in land care and farming issues and has held executive roles Lynn Murrell in Landcare and the Victorian Farmers’ Federation (VFF) at local and state Lynn resides in Portland and is a farmer/nurseryman with a Bachelor of Arts level. From 2002/2004, he represented Victoria as deputy community member Diploma. He has had many years experience with community and local on the Australian Landcare Council. He has been a CFA member for 35 years, government and is interested in the integrated community education including four years as local brigade captain. program, pest plant programs, coastal management and economic development initiatives. Terry Lewis - Representative of Department of Primary Industries (DPI) Terry resides in Horsham and is the Community Relationship Manager for the Ian Ross Wimmera and Glenelg Hopkins catchments within DPI. He has a Diploma of Ian is a self-employed agri-business proprietor from Telangatuk. He is skilled Agricultural Science (Longerenong) and a Diploma of Frontline Management. in primary production, land protection and water resource management and Terry has worked with the department in central and Western Victoria for has been involved extensively with the local community, particularly issues nearly 30 years and has held numerous agriculture and natural resource relating to the Glenelg River and Landcare. management positions.
Ian Hastings - Representative of Department of Sustainability & Environment (DSE) Ian is a Senior Project Manager with the DSE South West Region, responsible for facilitating and co-ordinating the region’s roles and contributions with integrated catchment management. He has a Bachelor of Science (Forestry) Honours and a Masters of Science majoring in wildlife and vegetation management. Ian’s 37 years of professional natural resource management has involved a variety of positions and experiences across Victoria.
Jacinta Ermacora Michael Murphy Peter Dark Terry Lewis Jacinta resides in Warrnambool and has a Bachelor of Social Work and a Masters in Policy and Management. She is a City of Warrnambool Councillor and Deputy Chair of the new Wannon Region Water Authority. Jacinta’s interests are in integrated responses to natural resource management, community engagement and policy development.
Robbie Greene Robbie is a beef cattle farmer from Casterton with considerable biological interests. He has been widely recognised for 40 years of business operations, including retail, wholesale and personnel management, before turning to consulting on marketing and customer loyalty. Robbie is a Justice of the Ian Hastings Jacinta Ermacora Robbie Greene Peace and has served on regional water boards for more than 20 years.
Susan Mudford Sue resides on a farm at Woorndoo and has tertiary qualifications in education. Her skills include native vegetation and wetland management, community facilitation, regional development and business practice. She is a Board Member of the Western Coastal Board and FEF. Her community activities include inaugural membership of the Woorndoo Land Protection Group, secretary of the Woorndoo School Reserve Committee and member of the Lake Bolac branch of the VFF.
Dr Heather Builth Susan Mudford Dr Heather Builth Cicely Fenton Based at Narrawong, Heather is an archaeologist specialising in indigenous cultural landscapes, with post graduate qualifications in GIS and Aboriginal Studies. She is presently a Post Doctorate Research Fellow with Monash University. In partnership with the Lake Condah Sustainable Development Project, Heather is working toward producing management plans for World Heritage listing of the Mt Eccles lava flow by undertaking analysis of indigenous and historical landscape modification.
Hilary Turner Lynn Murrell Ian Ross
08 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT
While 2004/2005 has been challenging for the Board and Research in the areas of land and water use change, management, the organisation has progressed in many areas. biodiversity measurement and environmental flows has resulted in important knowledge that now allows for better A highlight of the year was the launch of the Glenelg Hopkins resource management decision-making. CMA River Health Strategy - the first in Victoria - by the Minister for Environment and Minister for Water, the Hon John Even with many achievements, there is still much to do. Carp Thwaites, MP. The Governance & Committee Structure review management in the Glenelg River, river estuaries, sand has also been a key development during the reporting period. extraction and climate change are among future challenges. Budget expenditure of $12.75 million on the approved Regional The Glenelg Hopkins CMA Board has worked to gain many Catchment Investment Plan (RCIP) projects reflects a good outcomes and must be congratulated for its volunteer efforts, result with respect to onground outputs. particularly Chairman Mick Murphy. The example of endeavour provided by Member Lynn Murrell by walking the This year, 447 Partnership Projects were put in place. Each entire Victorian coastline also deserves recognition. involved equal contributions by the community and the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, producing positive outputs and The community Implementation Committees and staff have excellent community linkage. The projects approved will again have made notable contributions to improving our south provide outputs of 169 kilometres of waterway protection, 802 west region and are to be commended. hectares of revegetation, 616 hectares of remnant vegetation protection and 432 hectares of wetlands protection or enhancement. Additional to these Partnership Projects, outputs to the value of $1.33 million were carried out in the Glenelg Basin, $1.0 million of which was spent in designated priority areas. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s comprehensive strategic planning has been recognised with the Native Vegetation Plan and the Salinity Plan having been provided to the Minister for endorsement. Community engagement continues to be an important aspect Colin Dunkley of our operations, with a comprehensive review into this key Chief Executive Officer responsibility undertaken this year. The study highlighted existing capabilities and skills within the organisation. These facts are assisting the Governance and Committee Structure Review, from which will emerge a new Community Engagement policy, structure and method of implementation. Local government relationships also have been a focus. Assisted by the assessment project with Griffith University, a solid foundation for joint Glenelg Hopkins CMA/local government partnerships has been created. This year’s Corporate Plan provides clear direction for the organisation. The keys to organisational success have been a culture- developed team approach, information management and improved decision-making. The positive system approach has resulted in a notable Regional Catchment Investment Plan (RCIP) process involving 84 project proponents. The 2005/2006 RCIP will be funded to the indicative funding level.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 09 Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority
WATERWAYS REPORT
It is our pleasure to report on the work and achievements of The team’s role also expanded with the formalisation of the Waterways Implementation Committee (WIC) and the outcomes from the State Government White Paper Our Water waterways team over the past 12 months. Our Future, with additional responsibilities in managing the The year saw a productive relationship with the broader environmental water reserve. catchment community in a variety of onground works through There were a number of changes throughout the year. Sadly, the Partnership Projects Program, which made a significant Floodplain and Drainage Manager Brad Henderson and contribution to our vision of "Healthy waterways for the Waterways Community Education Co-ordinator Polly Hall left benefit of all". to share their vast experience and knowledge with other CMAs We commend the dedication of our project officers, who have in the State. Both made a great contribution over three years worked proactively with landholders and community groups with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA. on developing and implementing waterways projects. Each Johanna Theilemann joined the team as a new Floodplain and project, from the smallest to the largest, is an expression of the Works Engineer and has taken on the increasing workload of strong commitment we have to community partnerships. floodplain referrals and Works on Waterways permits With the aim of strengthening community relationships, the processing. WIC visited the Ararat Landcare Group, which is tackling an Rebecca Swanson joined at the start of the calendar year to ambitious project to rehabilitate Cemetery Creek. further the great work with community engagement and has Further, a visit to Casterton to inspect river rehabilitation and used her enthusiasm and skills to continue the momentum in sand management works on the Glenelg River was undertaken this area. in April while our June meeting was held at Lake Bolac. Richard Hodgens is the new Portland Coast Waterwatch Co- The latter included an inspection of the lake with community ordinator, replacing Dave Nichols, who is now the team leader representatives concerned about declining water levels and of the Waterwatch Group. Richard brings strong science skills increasing salinity. The highlight of these visits was the and enthusiasm to this important role. opportunity to meet with community members and share their The Glenelg Hopkins CMA ‘family’ has grown, with Janette vision for their area. Lowe, Linda Grant and Tania Parker taking leave to care for Throughout the year, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA through new babies. Peter Swanson successfully led the team as acting the WIC have been actively involved in many important Waterways Manager and Graeme Jeffrey and John Miles are processes relating to the protection and enhancement of the currently making a seamless transition in their temporary region’s rivers. maternity leave replacement roles. These include: Finally, we thank our catchment community partners. Without • Grange Burn wetland project - Hamilton the dedication of enthusiastic landholders, Landcare groups • Glenelg River Sand Management Plan and community members, our vision and plans for waterway health would not become "onground" realities. • Glenelg and Wimmera Rivers bulk entitlement In closing, 2005/2006 is shaping up as another busy year. With • Hopkins Estuary Management Plan an emphasis on improving the quality of project delivery and • Launch of the Glenelg Hopkins River Health Strategy community engagement, significant results are expected across • Flood levels - Warrnambool all areas, including addressing complex issues such as estuary • Regional Catchment Investment Plan management, carp containment, sand management and • Yambuk Estuary Management Plan environmental flows. • Strategy for existing rural drainage schemes • Glenelg Hopkins CMA Environmental Achievement Awards • Security and management of environmental water resources and the Inter-catchment Advisory Group. The strength and effectiveness of the WIC can be attributed to the passion, respect and co-operation of members, who have a wide range of backgrounds in rural and urban communities, government agencies, water authorities, universities and local government. Members are thanked for their valuable contribution. Similarly, the excellent efforts of waterways staff under the leadership of Janette Lowe are acknowledged and appreciated. Indeed, 2004/2005 was a great year for the waterways team in Kevin Drinkell Janette Lowe delivering high quality projects and tackling issues impacting WIC Chair Waterways Program on our rivers. Manager
10 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005
WATERWAYS IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
Kevin Drinkell - Chair John Harlock A community representative on the Waterways Implementation Committee, John is a community representative and a dairy farmer from the Kevin is a primary producer in the Telangatuk area and a mechanical Warrnambool area. He is the Chairman of the Genetics Australia Board and engineer. His areas of interest are the Glenelg River, Landcare and Chair of the Merri River Stream Flow Management Plan Implementation sustainable agriculture. Committee. John’s areas of interest are governance, strategic planning and Landcare. John Anderson - Deputy Chair John also is a community representative and a primary producer from the Graeme Ward Willaura area. He is a member of several organisations, including the Graeme is a Dairy Research Officer with Primary Industries Research of Willaura Landcare Group and Glenelg Salinity Group. John’s areas of Victoria (PIRVic), which is a division of the Department of Primary Industries. interests are salinity and groundwater. He has worked for DPI for 22 years. Graeme’s areas of interest are research in soil, water and nutrients and how they affect the dairy industry. Other John Sherwood areas of interest are irrigation and wet soil management John is an associate professor who joined Deakin University as a lecturer in 1979. A physical scientist with more than 20 years practical research Craig Murdoch experience, he has conducted field and laboratory studies in estuaries and Craig is a Senior Fisheries Management Officer – South West, a division of aquatic biogeochemistry. John has undertaken a large number of DPI. He is based in Colac and has more than 20 years experience with the collaborative projects funded by external partners and agencies. department. His areas of interest are sustainable recreational fishing and habitat management. Peter Robertson Peter is the Executive Manager of Infrastructure Services for Warrnambool City Council. He has a Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) and a Graduate Diploma of Municipal Engineering. Peter has 16 years experience in local government and five years in private consulting. His areas of interest include floodplain and coastal management.
Paul Battista Paul is a community representative with a certificate in Technical Natural Resource Management and seven years hydrograph experience. He was Deputy Chair of the Board at Glenelg Regional Water Authority. Paul’s areas Kevin Drinkell John Anderson John Sherwood of interest include urban planning, coastal management and the Water Act.
Kevin Safe Kevin recently retired as Chief Executive Officer of the Glenelg Regional Water Authority and has a Diploma in Civil Engineering and Engineer Water Supply. He has 10 years experience in the water industry and 30 years experience in local government. Kevin’s areas of interest are sustaining the water cycle and repairing damage to the environment.
Jan Hurlestone Peter Robertson Paul Battista Kevin Safe Jan is a community representative and a primary beef and wool producer from Woolsthorpe. She is also a lecturer and demonstrator at Ballarat University TAFE Division. Jan has a Bachelor of Science in which she double- majored in microbiology and biochemistry. Her areas of interest are agricultural land and farm practices as well as Landcare.
Bill Sharp Bill is a community representative and a primary producer in wool, beef and crops at Branxholme. He was an inaugural member of the Catchment and Land Protection Board (CALP) and has been a member of the Glenelg Hopkins Jan Hurlestone Bill Sharp Philip Du Guesclin CMA Board. Bill’s areas of interest are coastal and Landcare issues.
Philip Du Guesclin Philip is the Senior Flora and Fauna Management Officer in the Department of Sustainability and Environment and is based in Portland. He has nine years experience in agriculture and 30 years experience in fisheries and wildlife. Philip’s areas of interest are ecotourism, wetlands and natural history.
John HarlockGraeme Ward Craig Murdoch
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 11 Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority
LAND & BIODIVERSITY REPORT
This year has been particularly fulfilling and challenging for the Changes also have occurred in agency representation. For the Land and Biodiversity Implementation Committee (LABIC). first time, local government is represented through Russell Significant achievements have been delivered at the strategic, Guest, Senior Planning Officer at Moyne Shire. Russell has been partnership and onground level. a valuable addition, bringing a local government perspective to This delivery, however, has occurred in a climate of major the committee. personnel change, both within the committee and the Other changes include Helen Anderson, Peter Dixon and program. Credit must go to the existing personnel for their Zhongnan Nie for John Matthew, Mike Wagg and Geoff Saul. diligence, hard effort and guidance in leading the process and We thank John, Mike and Geoff for their contribution over delivering a successful year. many years and welcome Russell, Helen, Peter and Zhongnan. Significant LABIC achievements have included advancement of For the Land and Biodiversity team, the year was punctuated the Soil Health Action Plan, input into the Department of by a number of staff changes. Jody Chinner completed her Sustainability and Environment’s State-wide Weeds Review and temporary appointment as acting Land and Biodiversity commencement of a new Landcare Strategy. Manager and was replaced by Don Arnold. The son of a While these strategies are still to hit the ground in terms of Western District Soldier Settler, Don joins the Glenelg Hopkins implementation, getting the decision-making process right is a CMA with 25 years experience in land and marine management. major achievement. We thank Jody for her dedication in managing the program and the support she continues to provide. Providing vision and innovation is a key role for the LABIC. This year, the committee has focused on land stewardship and A particularly exciting development was the recruitment of ecosystem services that present an exciting new concept in new team members, specifically Landcare Facilitators Virginia delivering natural resource management. Adrian, Keith Davis, Thea Laidlaw, Shelley Lipscombe, Tony Lithgow and Louise Sheba. Through the delivery of the Victorian Volcanic Plains Project in conjunction with three other CMAs and specific land Indigenous Communities Landcare Facilitator Shane Bell and stewardship forums, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA is in a much Communications Officer Anna Hooper also joined the team stronger position to go forward and put concepts into practice. while Aggie Stevenson returned after caring for her new daughter, Ruby. The LABIC has endeavoured to meet with a range of community groups. Regional meetings were staged at Beaufort, Dunkeld, The move of making Landcare Facilitators Glenelg Hopkins CMA Terang and Yambuk where Landcare and other community employees has been well received, providing greater security to groups shared information and discussed issues. staff and delivering a better service to the Landcare community. Two staff resigned from the team - Felicia Choo The strength and effectiveness of the committee is directly joined the Corangamite CMA while Mark Hardy took the long related to its membership and its relationship with community drive to Western Australia where he is continuing his groups. Other noteworthy committee activities included: engagement with Landcare. • finalisation of Second Generation Landcare Grants We thank everyone associated with the Land and Biodiversity • input into the Department of Primary Industries sustainable program for their support and look forward to improving our landscapes program delivery in the coming year. • establishment of sub-committees within the LABIC to focus on specific topics • promoting the implementation of EBMP within the region • initiating the LABIC/staff induction support process • Regional Catchment Strategy implementation • input into the partnership project assessment and guideline review • RCIP project development and implementation • input into the wetland action plan. The year has not been without its challenges, although through adversity comes strength. Regrettably, Chair Laurie Norman resigned to pursue business interests. Laurie has been with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA since its inception and is one of its strongest supporters. Our task will be to maintain his high Ross Garton Don Arnold standards. LABIC Chairman Land & Biodiversity We also welcomed new community members Bruce Donaldson Program Manager and Jack Speirs from the Mortlake and Casterton areas. Both have skills and experience that will complement the loss in personnel. Jack is a past McKell medallist and has extensive experience in sustainable farming practices.
12 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 LAND & BIODIVERSITY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
Ross Garton - Chair Russell Guest Ross has a family property at Paschendale, bordering the Wannon River. Russell joined LABIC in January, 2005. He is a Town Planner with Moyne Shire Farm production comprises prime lambs, yearling beef, forestry and agro- and has 27 years experience in planning at state, regional and local forestry. Revegetation of the Garton’s property began in 1980, with 18% government levels. He holds qualifications in urban planning, economics and completed. Ross sees the ethic of land stewardship as a future guiding arts (history). In his role with the committee, Russell has a keen interest in principle for natural resource management in the region. seeing the translation of strategies into achievable outcomes.
Debbie Shea - Deputy Chair Jack Speirs A community member, Debbie and husband Robert own a fine wool A community member, Jack and wife Suzie run a 750-hectare sustainable commercial flock and stud on 967 hectares close to Ararat. During the 1980s, farming enterprise on the Wando River, north-east of Casterton. Jack has large soil conservation projects were successfully completed on their been involved with the Meat and Livestock Australia Research and property. They are currently involved in a project with the Department of Development Taskforce and the Southern Beef and Sustainable Grazing Primary Industries (DPI) on managing native vegetation and biodiversity for Systems Programs. He is Chairman of the state-wide Bestwool 2010 Program. profitable wool production. Debbie has a strong commitment to the Among numerous achievements, Jack and Suzie were the first Victorian Landcare ethic and sustainable, profitable farming. recipients of the prestigious McKell Medal for excellence and achievement in natural resource management in 2004. Zhoghnan Nie Zhongnan is a Senior Research Scientist at DPI, with specialist knowledge of Bruce Donaldson pasture ecology and pasture management issues in marginal environments. A community member, Bruce has owned and managed his 800-hectare He has published extensively in scientific journals for more than 20 years and grazing and cropping property near Mortlake for the past 27 years. He is a brings a strong analytical focus to LABIC. He obtained his PhD from Massey member of the Central Western Sustainable Grazing Systems and Watershed University where he studied grass/clover relationships on steep hills. 2000 committees. Bruce is President of the Blind Creek Landcare Group.
Helen Anderson Helen manages the Glenelg Hopkins Pest Plant Program for DPI, focusing on implementation of the Glenelg Hopkins Weed and Rabbit Action Plans and the Victorian Pest Management Framework. Currently based in Hamilton, Helen has worked with DPI for 14 years and has extensive experience in Landcare and salinity management. She has qualifications in agricultural science and frontline management.
Peter Dixon Peter is a DPI member of LABIC. He has lived in the district for 25 years, during which he has worked with landholders dealing with a wide range of Ross Garton Debbie Shea natural resource management issues. Peter is currently a sub-project manager and keen to see industry groups adopt best practice to achieve good environmental outcomes. He also is involved in the regional wine industry.
Doug Phillips Doug is a community representative who has spent eight years working as a conservation officer for the Portland Field Naturalists’ Club Inc, including three years as President. He has been involved in native vegetation management issues within the region and owns several Land for Wildlife properties in the Portland district. Doug has a strong interest in the Glenelg Zhoghnan Nie Helen Anderson Peter Dixon Hopkins CMA’s role within the community in progressing sustainable land use systems.
Don Jowett Don is a community member with a Diploma in Agricultural Science. He has worked with DPI in the fields of pasture productivity, agro-forestry and Landcare. He is currently a field manager with Green Triangle Plantation Forestry Ltd. Involved in farming for 26 years, he runs a prime lamb and agro- forestry property near Hamilton.
Glenn Whipp Doug Phillips Don Jowett Glenn Whipp A community member, Glenn has qualifications in agricultural science, extension and valuations. He has lived in the region for 29 years and has worked as an agricultural scientist with DPI in the fields of dryland salinity and field cropping. Glenn has a keen interest in engaging the community on natural resource management issues.
Andy Govanstone Andrew is a Senior Biodiversity Officer with the Department of Sustainability and Environment, based at Portland. He has worked to restore and protect indigenous landscapes for more than 20 years and brings considerable knowledge on threatened flora and fauna. Andrew has qualifications in Andy Govanstone Helen Keegan Russell Guest horticultural science and history.
Helen Keegan A community member, Helen and her family run a dairy farm at Warrong in South West Victoria. Helen also works as a paediatric nurse in Warrnambool. She has been involved in Landcare for 12 years and is a member of the Hopkins Moyne Land Management Farm Tree Group, of which she was President for four years during the 444,000 tree project. The Keegans are passionate about implementing their whole farm plan.
Jack Speirs Bruce Donaldson
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 13 Key Integration Tools GLENELG HOPKINS REGIONAL CATCHMENT STRATEGY 2003-2007
The Glenelg Hopkins Regional Catchment Strategy (RCS) 2003- 2007 was the first to be accredited by the Federal Government and endorsed by the State Government. The RCS contains a set of Key Integration Tools capable of creating lasting change and achieving multiple benefit outcomes across the challenge areas. The tools are: • Strategic Planning Janette Lowe Georgie Luckock Don Arnold • Regional Partnerships Waterways Program Corporate Program Land & Biodiversity • Onground Works Manager Manager Program Manager • Community Engagement and Capacity Building • Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting The objective of Strategic Planning is to undertake, co- ordinate and support strategic planning for effective natural resource management across the region at a variety of scales. The objective of Regional Partnerships is to create and enhance regional partnerships capable of providing a coherent Francis Pekin Eddie Meulman Gill Fry and effective response to the challenge of natural resource Finance Manager Strategic Catchment Integrated management and sustainability. Co-ordinator Communications Manager The objective of Onground Works is to build capacity among the community, landholders, industry and regional natural resource management agencies to undertake onground works. The objective of Community Engagement and Capacity Building is to engage the community in two-way communication to increase awareness, understanding and involvement in regional natural resource management issues and develop a stewardship ethic and empower people to act. The objective of Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting is to ensure continual learning is incorporated through a monitoring, evaluation and reporting framework capable of informing natural resource managers and the community of the effectiveness, efficiency and appropriateness of their actions. This annual report documents successes and achievements against these Key Integration Tools and demonstrates progress in achieving the Regional Catchment Strategy.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 15 Key Integration Tools ~ Strategic Planning
1. STRATEGIC PLANNING
LAND & BIODIVERSITY: Plans and projects WATERWAYS: Actions and research The Land and Biodiversity Program is focused on setting the Considerable energy has been given to developing a pilot framework for effective natural resource management actions community-driven integrated sub-catchment action plan in the and research to guide decision-making. Balmoral area. Known as Upper Glenelg CARES (Community, Several crucial plans are being prepared or have been Agriculture, Recreation, Environment and Sustainability), the completed. The Salinity and Native Vegetation Plans are plan is being developed by a community committee and key awaiting Department of Sustainability and Environment stakeholders. The aim is to produce an action plan and map for endorsement. A further two, soil health and wetlands, are landscape change in the area. underway and will be completed in 2005/2006. A number of Our understanding and direction for sand extraction as a tool existing plans have expired. During the next reporting period, for sand management within the Glenelg River system a new Regional Landcare Strategy will be developed along with improved with the development of a draft Sand Management a Pest Plant Action Plan. Preparation of these second Plan. This also has resulted in the Glenelg Hopkins CMA generation plans is an exciting and positive development. supporting sustainable commercial sand extraction within the The Regional Landcare Strategy will provide the community system through facilitating the administration component on with an opportunity to develop a visionary and innovative behalf of extractors. This learning area for the organisation is plan that reinvigorates the Landcare movement. It is an example of good environmental, social and economic gains recognised that land carers possess a wealth of knowledge and for the Glenelg River system and community. experience that can greatly assist strategy development. The South Warrnambool Flood Study is nearing completion and Accordingly, this document will reflect the views of Landcare will result in upgrading flood information for the Warrnambool participants. area. It will be used for controlling land development within Toward the end of the year, the Glenelg Hopkins region was the floodplain and be base data for determining how best to selected to pilot a new approach to weed action planning. Pest manage the floodplain in the future. plants are among the most serious threats to primary production and native biodiversity in the region. Focusing on An exciting joint project with many partners is the asset management and threat abatement, the new plan will development of an estuary entrance decision support system. better define the priority setting framework. As budgets will This is an innovative research project that aims to provide never adequately address the weed threat, priority setting and decision-makers across Australia, such as CMAs, with a tool to actions to harness and direct community involvement is assist in determining the risks and trade-offs in managing critical. artificial river mouth openings. Research that brings new knowledge and guides decision- Our understanding of the impact of land-use change on making is imperative as the Land and Biodiversity Program available surface water and groundwater increased strives for innovative and efficient strategic planning. During significantly with the results of Phase 2 of this research 2004/2005, a number of research projects delivered a better modelling. This is important information for water resource understanding of our regional assets and practices. managers in managing predicted changes. La Trobe University, in partnership with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, is establishing a much clearer understanding of geology COMMUNICATION and groundwater characteristics in the basalt plains. This will Community Engagement and Capacity Building remain a strong help better target the region’s salinity and groundwater focus for the Glenelg Hopkins CMA. Committed to ensuring the management actions. community’s voice is heard, the organisation is continuing to In partnership with Monash University, satellite imagery is implement the Communications Strategy to improve and build being used in an innovative way to map and predict salinity on relationships and partnerships across the region and while Deakin University has commenced a major project to beyond. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is working in partnership map coastal marine resources. with other Victorian CMAs to produce a State-wide The CSIRO, in partnership with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, is Communication Strategy. This will ensure there are consistent conducting a research program into the implications of messages and sharing of knowledge and resources. groundwater use by plantations. With the blue gum plantation The Glenelg Hopkins CMA also conducted a self assessment of industry at the forefront of land-use change within the region, the capability of the organisation to effectively engage the the research will help the Glenelg Hopkins CMA optimise community. Understanding and knowledge of community opportunities and address threats. engagement methods and techniques is high. Planning for Cropping is an expanding land-use change. In partnership with community engagement in project planning will ensure that Southern Farming Systems, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA is community engagement is a high priority. investigating practices relating to stubble retention. Further, the Department of Primary Industries is investigating CORPORATE PROGRAM nutrient management that will directly contribute to more The Corporate Program has reported against implementation of efficient and effective use of fertilisers. the Regional Catchment Strategy and developed a system to enable similar reporting against sub-strategy actions.
16 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 The Glenelg Hopkins CMA initiated the project to assess the use Remote sensing of native vegetation of remote sensing for mapping and monitoring the quantity and quality of native vegetation, particularly during During the year, the CSIRO's Division of Forestry and Forest implementation of the Regional Native Vegetation Plan. Products completed a research project for the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, known as ‘Evaluation of Vegetation Attributes from SPOT Without an understanding of the extent and quality of the 2.5m Imagery for Comparison with Habitat Hectare Data’. region's remnant vegetation, it is impossible to make informed decisions about the appropriate management regime required to reach the regional management action targets set for native vegetation. If remote sensing proves to be a reliable monitoring tool, then the technique will allow for a beneficial trade off between higher cost ground vegetation sampling and lower cost image processing analysis of remotely sensed data. Field data was collected at 21 plots within the G5 sub- catchment. This was recorded in two different implementations of the Habitat Hectares methodology. The ‘full method’ is the original method described by Parkes et al. (2003) and the 'faster' approach' is designed for quick implementation by moderately skilled surveyors. Image analysis was conducted on a SPOT 5 satellite image collected over the G5 sub-catchment on November 26, 2003. The SPOT data comprised panchromatic, green, red, near infrared and short-wave infrared image bands. Four different GIS layers, compatible to the field data, were generated from the satellite image. Analysis of the data indicated that information in the GIS layers was consistent with the observable features of the SPOT image. Remote sensing shows promise as a monitoring tool for native vegetation. The project report recommends a new collaborative project be • An aerial photograph and satellite image of the same patch of remnant developed based on full plot inventories sufficiently detailed to vegetation. Remote sensing can be used to predict the size and quality of the vegetation. (Photos courtesy CSIRO) compare with a remote sensing perspective of vegetation.
River health - a first in Victoria The Glenelg Hopkins River Health Strategy was the first in Victoria to be endorsed by the State Government. The strategy - the culmination of community consultation and considerable effort by a team of dedicated staff and the Waterways Implementation Committee - was unveiled by the Minister for Environment and Minister for Water, the Hon. John Thwaites, MP, at a special ceremony in March, 2005. Fittingly, the event was held beside the largest waterway in South West Victoria, the Glenelg River, at Nelson. • The Minister for Environment and Minister for Water, the Hon. John The Chairman of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, Michael Murphy, Thwaites, MP, and Glenelg Hopkins CMA Chairman, Michael Murphy, launch the River Health Strategy. (Photo courtesy Linda Jemmett) told more than 70 guests of the importance of the region and the key role the Glenelg Hopkins CMA played in river health. The River Health Strategy set priorities and direction for the He referred to the principles in the strategy, such as protecting protection and enhancement of rivers throughout the region, sections of rivers that had high environmental, social or he said, adding: economic values and enhancing areas that required an “This strategy is the first of 10 to be developed across the State investment to achieve a healthy condition. to implement key river health objectives outlined in the Bracks Waterways Manager Janette Lowe described regional Government’s Our Water Our Future action plan and the waterways, from the source of the Hopkins River in the north- Victorian River Health Strategy.” east to the venue for the day, the Glenelg River estuary. The strategy pivots on government support and community She highlighted the variation in river health across the region partnerships. It allows the community to access information and the need for communities to be informed and involved in about the principles, priorities, assets, threats, actions and waterway management. targets associated with regional rivers. Mr Thwaites congratulated the Glenelg Hopkins CMA and the The next challenge will be to implement a range of actions that community on its lead role in waterway and environmental target the health and sustainable use of waterways across protection. South West Victoria.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 17 Key Integration Tools ~ Regional Partnerships
2. REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS
LAND & BIODIVERSITY INITIATIVES ENVIRONET This year, six Landcare Community Facilitators were recruited Glenelg Hopkins EnviroNet is a conduit for communications to work with Landcare and other community groups in between groups/organisations with an interest in natural delivering native vegetation works, wetland protection, resource management. It aims to enhance NRM salinity mitigation and pest plant and animal control. communication outcomes through co-operative planning and Harnessing community volunteerism is an essential component co-ordination of activities. This year, Environet hosted the in delivering sustainable natural resource management. The EnviroNet Conference with the theme, ‘Learn, lead, inspire… commitment and results from community groups and Naturally’. facilitators has been outstanding. Further details of the conference can be found in the case While much has been achieved, the work is far from complete. study (page 19). A further highlight within the Land and Biodiversity Program PARTNERS was the recruitment of an Indigenous Community Landcare Facilitator. In partnership with Winda Mara, Framlingham and Throughout the year, partnership development and knowledge other Aboriginal communities, the role of this position is to transfer with key agencies, such as local government and water support natural and cultural resource management and raise authorities, has built capacity and delivered significant natural awareness of cultural heritage values among the non- resource management outcomes. indigenous community. This has been in line with action targets detailed in the Regional The partnership with local government continues to grow, with Catchment Strategy. a dedicated liaison position created within the program in Continued support of the South West Sustainability 2004/2005. While it is early days, results are promising. Local Partnership remains a key to achieving aspirational targets for government highlights include land capability in the Ararat regional sustainability. The partnership mirrors one of the Rural City Shire and accounting for coastal assets within the objectives of the Regional Catchment Strategy, which states: Moyne Shire planning scheme. “The adoption of sustainability as an overarching regional Working with non-government organisations is also important. theme will create a competitive advantage that value-adds to In particular, the relationship with Trust for Nature continues goods and services and improves the quality of life for current through the establishment of covenants on private land while and future generations.” Greening Australia implemented a range of revegetation The Future Environment Fund (FEF) was established under the projects to enhance biodiversity. auspices of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA to source additional State Government partnerships through the Department of funds for priority projects across the catchment. Primary Industries (DPI), Department of Sustainability and The FEF’s charter specifically calls for a co-operative working Environment (DSE) and Parks Victoria are central to the delivery relationship with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA and to provide of the Land and Biodiversity Program. Various projects were assistance in funding projects identified through the use of conducted relating to threatened species, native vegetation science or experience. management, wetland protection, salinity mitigation, The fund has attracted to its Board skilled, high profile environmental monitoring and pest plants and animals. community members who are actively driving the process. The Board has prepared promotional material and made representations to business and philanthropic groups. Organisations assisting the Glenelg Hopkins CMA to deliver the Regional Catchment Investment Plan include Deakin University, DPI, DSE and Parks Victoria. Local government in particular is playing a major role in project delivery.
• White-necked heron. (Photo courtesy James Pevitt)
18 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 The conference dinner was held at the Royal Mail Hotel, EnviroNet Conference Dunkeld. Guest speaker Aaron Wood (2004 Young Australian The 1st Environet Conference was held at the Hamilton of the Year) presented on his involvement with the Performing Arts Centre on November 4 and 5, 2004. The theme International River Health conference for school age children. was ‘Learn, lead, inspire… Naturally” and portrayed a variety The final sessions involved two bus tours within the Glenelg of social and environment themes over the two days. Hopkins catchment, which highlighted a variety of topical and Andrew Campbell (Land and Water Australia), the initial interesting sites. The tours incorporated themes from the Manager for the Potter Farms, opened the event and was previous day. followed by 12 presenters who covered a broad range of topics, The Glenelg Hopkins CMA, Southern Grampians Shire, including local scale GIS development, Aboriginal cultural Timbercorp and the Department of Sustainability and heritage sites, landscape futures and Weed Warriors. Environment sponsored the event.
Visionary wins prestigious award Western District graziers Jack and Suzie Speirs were awarded the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s Lifetime Achievement Award in May, 2005. Mr Speirs, who runs a sustainable farming enterprise on the Wando River, north-east of Casterton, received the honour with wife Suzie at a gala Environmental Achievement Awards ceremony at the Hamilton Performing Arts Centre. The awards recognise the exemplary work of individuals, groups and organisations in environmental management and protection in South West Victoria. Mr Speirs was acknowledged for his work in nutritionally balanced soils that optimise pasture and animal production capabilities in a profitable, sustainable and safe environment. He also has helped develop effective and innovative educational programs based on research activities on the family property, ‘Satimer’. Mr Speirs won the individual category in 2004. The same year he was awarded the McKell Medal, a national award for excellence and achievement in natural resource management. • Jack and Suzie Speirs, winners of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s Lifetime The medal commemorates the contribution in soil and land Achievement Award. (Photo courtesy Josie Hayden) conservation by former NSW Premier and Governor-General of Australia, Sir William McKell. Portland Workskills won the Organisation/Business Award for Other major Glenelg Hopkins CMA Environmental Achievement its community-based, not-for-profit community development Award winners were: initiatives and training services throughout the Glenelg and • Individual - Neil Murray Southern Grampian Shires. • Individual in Business - John Sherwood, of Deakin University Portland Observer journalist Ami Humpage took out the Media Award for her outstanding coverage of major regional issues. • Organisation/Business - Portland Workskills South Beach Wetlands and Landcare Group from Port Fairy • Media - Ami Humpage, of The Portland Observer received the Landcare Award for its wetland restoration work • Landcare - South Beach Wetlands and Landcare Group from in Port Fairy and Roger Thompson, of Hamilton, won the Port Fairy Waterwatch Award for his dedicated monitoring work on the • Community Group/Schools - Hawkesdale and District Action Grange Burn. Committee The Hawkesdale and District Action Committee was recognised • Waterwatch - Roger Thompson, Hamilton. for its contribution in re-developing Apex Park in Hawkesdale. Neil Murray’s leadership and extensive work with community The awards were also supported by the National Action Plan for organisations, in particular the hEELing Walk and Eel Festival Salinity and Water Quality, Deakin University, Timbercorp, in Lake Bolac, was recognised with the Individual Achievement Iluka Resources, Grampians Wimmera Mallee Water, the Award, while John Sherwood’s commitment to improving the Department of Sustainability and Environment, the natural environment saw him receive the Individual in Department of Primary Industries and Murray Goulburn. Business Award.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 19 Key Integration Tools ~ Onground Works
3. ONGROUND WORKS
LAND & BIODIVERSITY The operating wetland has created an attractive entrance to Onground works continue to be a major focus of the Land and Hamilton for those entering from the direction of Portland, as Biodiversity Program, with around $3.2 million or 50 per cent well as treating 70 per cent of Hamilton’s stormwater before it allocated to this operational area. enters the Grange Burn. Works undertaken were consistent with outputs identified in Preparations for the construction of self-cleaning carp screens the Native Vegetation, Salinity, Landcare, Rabbit and Weed at Rocklands Reservoir has been undertaken before starting the Action Plans. These spanned 45 individual projects. $1.2 million project. In addition, grants were provided through Second Generation New technology developed for the screens required Landcare and Partnership Project salinity and wetland independent testing and review. The results have been positive programs. In total, 135 grants were provided. with the test screens showing there is an extremely low risk of viable fish eggs or lavae passing into the Glenelg River. The new The table below outlines outputs from the grants program. screens will provide higher surety and less maintenance than the existing hand-cleaned screens and will enable larger WATERWAYS environmental flows to be released from the reservoir. The Partnership Projects Program continued to be extremely About 2km of the Glenelg River at Casterton has been improved successful in enhancing river riparian zones. This was achieved by shifting excess sand from the riverbed and re-snagging. Logs through working with landholders to fence and revegetate were sourced from the new mineral sands mine at Douglas with their river frontages. the assistance of Iluka. Re-snagging improves the river by Commissioning of the Grange Burn Wetland Stage 1 (refer to providing scours and variable water depths, maintaining low- case study page 25) was a highlight in the Hamilton area. This flow channels instead of flat beds of sand, and by providing was preceded by a community planting day, during which the habitat for aquatic life, such as fish. wetland and surrounds were planted with local species, Funding was provided through an initiative under the State mulched and watered. The second cell also was constructed in Government's Our Water Our Future plan. preparation for spring planting.
Projects approved in 2004/2005 Waterways Land & Biodiversity Total Area of remnant protection (ha) 596 20 616 Area of salinity discharge control (ha) 181 644 825 Area of salinity recharge control (ha) 48 592 640 Area of wetland protected or enhanced (ha) 103 329 432 Area revegetated (ha) 689 113 802 Crossings constructed (no.) 30 30 Length of stream protection or enhanced (km) 165 4 169 Off stream watering point established (no.) 87 3 90 Area of effective pest animal control (ha) 670 670 Area of effective weed control (ha) 3,269 3,269
20 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 Hamilton grazier Robert Addinsall, in partnership with the Protection through partnerships Glenelg Hopkins CMA, recently enhanced and protected a The Partnership Projects Program plays an important role in section of Sawpit Creek, a tributary of the Wannon River. assisting land managers undertake important onground works. The project addressed a range of environmental issues It also provides an opportunity for the Glenelg Hopkins CMA to associated with the waterway and surrounding land. provide technical and, where appropriate, financial assistance Establishing stock proof fencing will have a positive impact by for projects. protecting remnant vegetation and reducing the level of streamside erosion created by stock trampling the banks. Limiting erosion will halt the amount of silt entering the Wannon River and assist in reducing nutrient levels in Sawpit Creek. Revegetating the streamside with indigenous species will stabilise the banks, provide a filter for run off into the creek and deliver biodiversity benefits by creating habitat for native fauna. The establishment of the trees and fences also will provide shelter for stock and better control grazing for more efficient land management. By erecting stock proof fencing, about 700 metres along both sides of the waterway have been protected. In addition, 1,900 indigenous seedlings have been planted while approximately 0.5 hectares have been direct seeded with a mixture of indigenous grasses. Robert plans to continue the project next year and will eventually link up with work undertaken by his neighbours. • A section of Sawpit Creek has recently been enhanced and protected through the Partnership Projects Program. (Photo courtesy Tim Covey)
High praise for Glenthompson Widely acknowledged as one of the best examples of Landcare in Australia, the Glenthompson Catchment Group has been working tirelessly over a decade to improve their landscape. Established in 1992, the group is based around the township of Glenthompson in South West Victoria. Comprising five Landcare groups, a volunteer steering committee was formed with one representative from each group and a funded part-time project officer to oversee implementation of onground works. Covering 54,000 hectares and 73 mixed cropping farming families, the group has administered funding of $559,543 over the past 13 years, successfully targeting the fragmentation and decline of native indigenous vegetation, salinity, erosion and biodiversity. A major initiative is ‘The Hopkins River to Grampians Biolink’. Between 1999 and 2002, the group was involved in a landscape-scale revegetation program linking fragments of •Onground works, Glenthompson. (Photo courtesy Julia Schlapp) remnant vegetation. Individuals, community, schools and agencies worked together to deliver more than 260 kilometres Recently, onground works have focused on reducing land of waterways fencing, 159,000 trees planted and 418km degradation such as soil erosion and salinity. To combat this, directly seeded with locally collected native indigenous species. recharge works include 73km of fencing, 57,500 trees planted More than 420 hectares have been preserved and revegetated and 175km of direct seeding to assist in improving water through this project alone. quality in Hopkins River tributaries. It is a major achievement of which the group and community Other advantages have flowed from these works, including the can be proud. It is only one of many projects the group has economic benefit of increased on-farm productivity and the successfully completed, however. recreational benefits of improved water quality.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 21 Key Integration Tools ~ Onground Works
4. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & CAPACITY BUILDING
LAND & BIODIVERSITY INVESTMENT ENVIRO AWARDS The Land and Biodiversity Program recognises that the In May, 2005, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA held its third environmental repair bill is beyond the budget of government Environmental Achievement Awards. The awards recognise the and can only be achieved through community volunteerism. exemplary work of individuals, groups and organisations in Accordingly, the program has invested heavily in community environmental management and protection in South West engagement and capacity building. More than 50 per cent of Victoria. The awards were sponsored by Deakin University, the team is actively engaged as Landcare Facilitators to support Timbercorp, Iluka Resources, Murray Goulburn, Grampians community groups in building capacity and delivering natural Wimmera Mallee Water, the Department of Primary Industries, resource management. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Glenelg Hopkins CMA and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Additionally, the program provides more than $3/4 million in Water Quality. grants to financially support community groups. While most of this is directed to onground works, the program recognises Further information about the awards can be found in the case that community groups also need administrative support. study (page 19). Approximately $30,000 is distributed to community groups in the form of much needed administrative support grants. To complement this funding, the program collates and edits a Regional Landcare newsletter to keep individuals and groups in touch with regional activities and events. Distributed bi- monthly, Landlife has a readership of approximate 2,500. It is widely valued within the regional community and has evolved as one of the program’s key communication tools. A particular highlight has been the publication of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA calendar prepared by Wendy Lehmann. Featuring regional threatened species, the value of the calendar was emphasised when a Casterton resident refrained from killing what she initially believed to be a snake based on what she • Environmental Achievement Awards night. (Photo courtesy Josie Hayden) recalled from the calendar. The animal turned out to be the rare striped legless lizard, a new sighting for the Casterton area. DAIRY FARMS COURSE The program’s ability to deliver community engagement and The pilot accredited training course for dairy farmers in the capacity building was boosted with the recruitment of Anna Lower Hopkins Basin focused on management of stream Hooper to provide communications support. Anna will be frontages. involved in a variety of activities, including salinity, Participant surveys revealed the course was well received, with biodiversity and Landcare. the majority of farmers stating they were now confident in managing stream frontages more effectively. Visits to properties demonstrating good riparian zone management were a highlight. Farmers valued seeing work undertaken by other farmers and gained an understanding of potential issues. Partnership Project opportunities and grant availability was discussed with farmers, who were enthusiastic about future projects with the Glenelg Hopkins CMA. Discussions are being held with Melbourne University on conducting the course annually.
ICON SPECIES COMPETITION An icon species competition attracted more than 180 entries, with prizes awarded to various category winners. Primary schools in particular were supportive and four schools submitted 160 entries. Winners of the primary school category • Rare striped legless lizard. (Photo courtesy Veridans Images) were from Hamilton and Alexandra College. The overall winner was Rebecca Crawford, a local graphic designer. Her work will be featured on Glenelg Hopkins CMA material relating to ‘Welcoming water back to the Glenelg’ (through the piping of the Mallee and Wimmera channel systems).
22 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005
HISTORICAL PHOTOS Historical photographs always strike a cord, especially when compared to the present day. With this in mind, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA secured copies of photographs taken around the turn of the century and commissioned a photographer to capture the same scenes in 2004. The historical photos exhibition, titled ‘Windows into the Western District’, was opened at the River Health Strategy launch and is being shown at various regional events.
• Guest speaker Steve Starling - Fish for Thought seminar
2. Fish for Thought A fishing and estuary information seminar was held on the Nelson Endeavour at Nelson. The night was entertaining as well as informative. Guest speakers were Steve Starling, a well-known and respected fishing and outdoors journalist, and Associate Professor John Sherwood, a physical scientist at Deakin University and Glenelg Hopkins CMA Environmental Achievement Awards winner. 3. Canoe down the Glenelg The third educational seminar on the Glenelg River involved
• Historical photos exhibition. (Photo courtesy Gill Fry) year 11 environmental studies students from Hamilton and Alexandra College.
SEMINAR SERIES Students enjoyed a canoe trip down a reach of the river while seeing a variety of wildlife and identifying the A highly successful seminar series designed to connect the changing processes within the river system. The day also community with the Glenelg River was conducted during the highlighted sand problems in the river and included water year. The seminars highlighted environmental issues confronting testing. the major waterway and various management works. 4. High hurdler at Harrow 1. Snags for Snags A night of entertainment at Harrow featured Olympic Casterton was the venue for a Snags for Snags seminar and hurdler Kyle Vander Kyup. There was also traditional barbecue. The title was derived from the speech of Aboriginal dancers and bush tucker sampling Dr Michelle Jones Lennon, research scientist for the Department of Primary Industries. 5. Stefano cooks carp Dr Lennon discussed the Productive Grazing, Healthy Rivers Stefano dePieri, the nationally renowned chef, appeared at project, which aims to improve riparian and in-stream the Balmoral Golf Club to showcase his talents by cooking biodiversity on intensive grazing properties across southern carp for 60 lucky residents. Victoria. She also spoke on the importance and benefits of Carp commercial fisherman Keith Bell also was on hand to snags in rivers and streams. answer questions about exporting the fish to Europe and The other guest speaker was world champion marathon Asia and demonstrate simple filleting techniques (refer to swimmer Tammy van Wisse, who provided an insight into case study page 27). water quality in the Murray River following her recent epic FIELD DAYS swim down the waterway. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA again participated in two of the region’s biggest events, Sheepvention and ACME Field Days. The events allow the free flow of information between the community and the organisation in a relaxed atmosphere.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 23 Key Integration Tools ~ Community Engagement & Capacity Building
To complement the launch of this resource, a series of professional development afternoons were held for teachers to showcase the resources and expertise available to assist environmental education programs. Water quality monitoring is one of the most effective means of measuring the health of a catchment. Training for community members to undertake water quality monitoring continued to be one of the more important aspects of the program. This training increases the capacity of the community to more fully understand the workings of the natural environment in which they live. Training events occurred regularly throughout the year, resulting in 70 adults learning the skills needed to effectively monitor water quality. During the year, Waterwatch hosted or participated in 26 special events. These included World Environment Day, National Tree Day, National Water Week and Saltwatch Week. Attendances at these events were numbered in the hundreds. Publicity surrounding Waterwatch activities adds value to the program, whereby core messages are reported to larger audiences. Again this year, there were more than 20 reports in the print media and newsletters on Waterwatch activities. The program continued to be well sponsored by partner organisations, such as South West Water, Glenelg Water and Southern Grampians Shire, while many other groups provided in-kind support. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is indebted to the people who continue to provide valuable support for this important program. • Indigenous dancers entertain during the successful Harrow seminar. (Photo courtesy Linda Jemmett) INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS Community Engagement and Capacity Building was highlighted WATERWATCH in a call for innovative and new Partnership Project proposals Waterwatch is a national community education and water as part of the Regional Catchment Investment Plan process. quality monitoring program focusing on all aspects of This initiative was well received within the community. catchment health. Community involvement and linkages, particularly forums for In the Glenelg Hopkins region, Waterwatch has been investor information, continue to increase. Similarly, there has instrumental in developing an ethos in natural resource been a significant rise in regional investment in natural management, especially in schools. In 2004/2005, it continued resource management along with improved co-ordination to enthuse and inspire 6,000 primary school and 1,100 between planning authorities and the community. secondary school students, who participated in the program. GOVERNANCE REVIEW Community participation also continued to remain strong, with more than 215 sites monitored regularly. There were The Glenelg Hopkins CMA has undertaken a detailed several snapshot monitoring events, such as Saltwatch. Governance and Committee Structure Review to ensure optimum community participation in natural resource To add value to its extensive workshop delivery program, the management decision-making. Glenelg Hopkins CMA Waterwatch developed the highly valuable resource, Critters, Creeks and Catchments. This CD The Board is working toward finalising and implementing and book features 80 pages of information highlighting a range recommendations from the review that will ensure closer of catchment management issues. community engagement and ‘investment’ in sustainable resource management practices and programs.
24 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005
Grange Burn wetland a ‘showcase’ A multi-purpose wetland designed to treat much of Hamilton’s stormwater runoff is a ‘showcase’ community Partnership Project. The wetland is being established over 14 hectares of Grange Burn floodplain on the western fringe of the township. The $2 million project was started in 2003 and is scheduled for completion next year. On a parcel of land adjacent to Digby Road, Carmichael Street and Mt Baimbridge Road, the wetland will provide: • a treatment facility for about 70 per cent of the town’s stormwater • rehabilitation and protection of wetland flora, including several threatened species • a recreational asset for walking, picnics, barbecues and fishing • a local and regional educational resource focusing on water • Grange Burn wetland quality and biodiversity • biodiversity enhancement, in particular habitat for the Eastern Barred Bandicoot and wetland birds. The project represents a cohesive partnership between When fully functional, the rehabilitated site will remove most Southern Grampians Shire, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA, the of the nitrogen, phosphorous and suspended sediment National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality and the contained in stormwater. Hamilton community. It also will process other contaminants, such as hydrocarbons The Environment Protection Authority also was involved in the and metals, leading to a significant improvement in the health planning stage by providing funding and technical advice on of the Grange Burn. the stormwater treatment component. More than 100,000 native plants will be used for water Community involvement has featured planting days, which will treatment and habitat for wetland fauna. Paths, boardwalks, continue in the future. interpretative signage, bird hides, viewing platforms, picnic The public also will have opportunities - through the Grange areas and parking also will be provided. Burn Stakeholders’ Advisory Group and the Friends of the The project, which has involved significant community Grange Burn - to participate in working bees to weed and tidy consultation, saw work begin in May, 2004, on Stage 1, the the wetland as required, bird counts and frog and water southern treatment cell. Stage 2, the northern treatment cell, quality monitoring. was started in February, 2005. These groups also will host guided walks and information Earthworks, landscaping and piping are complete, with most of sessions about the wetland and its links to the Grange Burn and Stage 1 having been planted with native trees, shrubs, grasses Lake Hamilton. and aquatic plants. Stage 2 will be planted over spring 2005 The local media has been very supportive by conveying project and 2006. updates to the wider community.
• Grange Burn wetland. (Photos courtesy Linda Jemmett)
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 25 Key Integration Tools ~ Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting
The network evolved to achieve more targeted use of Weed eradication success community-based funding for onground works in the Yambuk and Hawkesdale areas. It is also involved in the DPI’s rabbit From humble beginnings, the Moyne Weed Eradication Network control program through the removal of significant areas of has logged up an impressive list of achievements. rabbit harbour. One project that has had a significant impact on the A key objective of the network is to facilitate follow up landscape has been the effective treatment of more than 200 revegetation works when weeds are under control. hectares of gorse infestation in high priority riparian zones across Moyne Shire. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s involvement has been critical to the network’s success, with funds being channelled into works Other milestones include: programs. • raising community awareness of the benefits of long-term integrated gorse control and revegetation work through “If community interest is generated and works are obviously local, regional and state media being done, then other local landholders will begin their own • as part of a three-year action plan, conducting three field works, particularly when they see the good results we have days to demonstrate effective control methods, including achieved.” appropriate equipment and chemical use, and the - Tim Bligh, Moyne Weed Eradication Network member, importance of follow up works Hopkins Falls Landcare Group. • an uptake by landholders of revegetation sites within priority areas “I believe the program has been very successful. The amount of • enhancing local Landcare projects and initiatives. work carried out in DPI priority areas has been exceptional. Within the network’s area, there has been 100% compliance by The late Don Reardon initiated the Moyne Weed Eradication landholders undertaking works. This project will be a long-term Network in 2000 and his local knowledge and community links integrated control program, with follow up treatments and, set a solid foundation for future activities. importantly, an on-going monitoring program to assess results. The network began as a gorse control partnership project Continued funding support is vital to maintain the momentum between Landcare groups - St Helens, Southern Moyne and we’ve achieved to date.” Hopkins Moyne - and Moyne Shire, the Country Fire Authority - Mark Doueal, DPI Catchment Management Officer, and Department of Primary Industries (DPI). Pest Plant & Animal Programs, Warrnambool. The Hopkins Falls Landcare Group, Department of Sustainability and Environment and VicRoads joined a year later.
• As part of community engagement through their Gorse Local Action Plan, the Moyne Weed Eradication Network has run three community field days like this one at Purnim. With around 40 participants, mechanical control methods were demonstrated along with chemical control trials set up and sponsored by Dow Agro Sciences Australia. Ltd. Right: An article on the network published in the summer 2005 edition of the Victorian Landcare and Catchment Management Journal. (Photos courtesy Kevin Sharp)
26 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 Stefano shows how Nationally renowned chef Stefano dePieri made an appearance at an educational seminar at the Balmoral Golf Club. The seminar, the fifth in a series organised by the Glenelg Hopkins CMA as part of the State Government’s Stressed Rivers Initiative, featured the flamboyant identity and owner of the famous Stefano’s restaurant at Mildura. Describing himself as a “cook of country stuff”, Stefano showcased his talents by cooking carp for 60 Balmoral residents during an entertaining and informative evening. Stefano told his audience he had eaten and served carp in his restaurant, which has been credited with three hats in the reputable Age Good Food Guide. Carp commercial fisherman Keith Bell also was on hand to answer questions about exporting the fish to Europe and Asia and demonstrated simple filleting techniques. The seminar series focused on various environmental issues and management works being undertaken on the Glenelg River.
• Keith Bell and Stefano dePieri cook up a storm. (Photo courtesy Linda Jemmett)
5. MONITORING, EVALUATION & REPORTING
LAND & BIODIVERSITY RESOURCE CONDITION TARGETS Monitoring and evaluating the activities of the Land and In accordance with the Regional Catchment Strategy, the Biodiversity Program is fundamental to ensuring continuous Glenelg Hopkins CMA is augmenting previous initiatives on improvement. This year, the program conducted a range of resource condition targets. The aim is to ensure a simple and activities that will deliver benefits in coming years. easily applied framework for managing catchment health. A major achievement was finalisation of the third party The framework will be adaptive, encompass good knowledge independent review of the Landcare program. systems and include an inbuilt capacity to learn from Recommendations from the evaluation are being progressively management decisions and change management strategies on implemented. the basis of improved knowledge. In the field, wetland, groundwater and salinity monitoring DATA CAPTURE continued in partnership with the Department of Primary Industries. A long-term program providing quality assured Building access to intellectual assets and monitoring data, it monitors a range of wetlands, including Lake environmental conditioning over time is another significant Linlithgow, Lake Burrumbeet, Bryan Swamp and Chinaman’s project. Swamp as well as groundwater at a number of sites. Information being captured includes photo points, project This information provides a key indicator of natural resource data such as inputs and outputs, monitoring details and project condition within the region. status. This information will be incorporated on the Intranet for easy staff access. WATER MONITORING This component will operate in tandem with the internal IT Surface water quality monitoring has continued throughout function, in time contributing to its improvement and better the catchment. The formation of the South West Monitoring utilisation. In essence, the project is essential for providing Network has delivered cost savings and provides an avenue for a fundamental tracking system for record and management undertaking future monitoring in a partnership approach. of change. Water quality monitoring has been expanded in several FRAMEWORK estuaries. In the case of the Surry River, it led to identification Linking to a State-wide strategy on monitoring, evaluation and of a serious water quality issue upstream of the estuary reach reporting, a Glenelg Hopkins CMA project titled Development and resulted in the Glenelg Hopkins CMA not authorising an of Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks to Assess artificial river mouth opening in June, 2005. Performance Against RCS Priorities (and detailed RCTs) will incorporate each of the required components. The project is scheduled for completion in December, 2005.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 27 Key Integration Tools ~ Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting
THE HEALTH OF OUR WATERWAYS
INDEX OF STREAM CONDITION An ISC score comprises five sub-indices: water quality, aquatic The Index of Stream Condition (ISC) is designed to assess all life, hydrology, physical form and streamside zone. Each sub- aspects of river health and is co-ordinated by the Department index is made up of a number of measures. of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) in Victoria. The variables used in the Index of Stream Condition assessment Each Catchment Management Authority (CMA) is responsible in 1999 represented the key factors that contribute to, or for undertaking the assessment in their region. This is affect, river health. While this set of variables represented the conducted every five years, with the first being completed in best available science at the time, in some cases they are 1999 and the most recent in early 2004. actually a very coarse measure of the impact on river health.
Salt Ck 3. Mathers Creek - The quality appears River to be degrading (2000-2004) although it HARROW still meets SEPP guidelines.
Pigeon Chetwynd ARARAT BALMORAL 3 Creek lg Ponds River Glene Creek River 1.Rivulet Glenelg River - Quality has Good Morning DERGHOLM Bank Bill Creek been degrading (1997-Mathers 2004). Site 4 no longer meets SEPP guidelines. GLENELG
Steep River Creek BASIN Creek 1 Wando 5. Wannon River - The quality River4. Wannon River - The quality appears
WILLAURA Creek Fiery appears to be improvingWannon (1997-2004) to be degrading (2000-2004) although it but it does not meetCAVENDISH SEPP guidelines. still meets SEPP guidelines. Dwyer Konong Creek Wannon Back CASTERTON 2 5 GLENTHOMPSON Bryans COLERAINE Hopkins DUNKELD Henty LAKE BOLAC 2. Bryans Creek - The quality has remained the Grange Reedy River Creek Burn Creek same (1997-2004) but does not meet SEPP Greys MERINO Creek Violet guidelines and has the lowest quality of allMiaki sites. 6 Creek te Creek HAMILTON Boonawah Creek Creek Fiery River 6. Grange BurnCox CreekCreek - The qualityBurchett River Kanga has remained the same (1997-2004) but Cree PENSHURST Stokes roo BRANXHOLME it does not meet SEPP guidelines. 8 k Darlot River Muston Creek CARAMUT River 8. Stokes RiverDARTMOOR- The quality is 7 7. Springburn Creek - The quality is improving PORTLAND Creek degrading (1998-2004) and no Crawford Creek (1998-2004) and still meetsCreek SEPP guidelines. This CONDAH Spring longer meets SEPP guidelines. Springburnis the highest quality site of allBASIN sites. Moyne Creek Glenelg Eumeralla Blind MACARTHUR Back Moleside Fitzroy MORTLAKE NELSON Creek Hopkins River River HEYWOOD Creek 9 HAWKESDALE Surrey Eumeralla
Creek WOOLSTHORPE
Creek River Darlot 9. Darlot Creek - The quality has River TERANG remained the same (1999-2004) but Creek Mt Emu does not meet SEPP guidelines. Drysdale Wattle Shaw KOROIT River Hill River Merri River Ck Creek
PORTLAND Brucknell Deep Creek ALLANSFORD PORT FAIRY WARRNAMBOOL
Numbers on the map 1-9 refer to biological health data (see page 29).
28 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 Since then, there have been advancements in scientific BIOLOGICAL HEALTH DATA knowledge, particularly in relation to environmental flows and Biological assessment of waterways using macroinvertebrates the effects of changes to hydrology on river condition, the is extremely useful for measuring stream health. The results assessment of vegetation health and refinement of water summarise the history of the stream as the macroinvertebrate quality models. community reflects impacts such as pollution and disturbance To take advantage of this and ensure the ISC was as relevant as over previous weeks and months. possible, a review of the methodology, including all five The EPA assesses a number of sites in the Glenelg catchment indices, was undertaken. each year (in spring and autumn). The map contains two Due to the advancements in methodology and the different types of information - the trend of biological health necessary quality checking of data, the final results were over the past five years and whether the site meets State not available at the time of printing of this report. Environment Protection Policy (SEPP) guidelines. However, the results are to be launched soon and will be accessed on the Internet at the Victorian Water Resources The EPA samples each site about every five years at exactly the Data Warehouse (www.vicwaterdata.net). same point using the same methods. Information regarding trends is important in highlighting potential problem areas or sites where stream health is improving. Four of the nine sites are degraded, three have remained the same and two have improved. ARARAT Four indices are reported: number of families, EPT (number Trewalla of three pollution-sensitive families), SIGNAL (index of
Creek pollution sensitivity) and AUSRIVAS (how similar the site is to Mt Emu Creek healthy sites). Creek BEAUFORT Burru mbee The EPA sets levels for each of the indices. If three of the four t Creek scores meet the levels, the site satisfies State Environment Creek Protection Policy (SEPP) guidelines. If the SEPP is not met, further investigations should be carried out into the reasons Creek BALLARAT Battle Salt for poor water quality. HOPKINS Six of the nine sites fail to meet the guidelines. Further, if the BASIN SKIPTON trend at two others that do comply with the criteria continues, it could be expected the guidelines will not be met in the Creek future. Increasing quality at one site, however, may mean the guidelines will be met in the future. Creek The decline in quality may be due to recent drought conditions, an associated decline in water quality and habitat or upstream/on-site impacts. The high quality of river health at the Crawford River site is encouraging. It is one of the high value, ecologically healthy river reaches that should continue K ILOMETRES N to be protected.
Creek
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 29 Key Integration Tools ~ Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting
KEY PROJECTS
1. BALMORAL 3. GLENELG RIVER, SOUTH OF CASTERTON • Upper Glenelg CARES Project - Community, Agriculture, • Environmental flow monitoring along the Glenelg - 20 water Recreation, Environment and Sustainability. G5 Project run quality sites, 8 fish sites, 10 habitat inundation/sites by the community 4. DARTMOOR AREA • 4,900 megalitres released into the Glenelg River as environmental and compensation flows between November, • Research into the Glenelg Spiny Crayfish and Glenelg 2004 - May, 2005 Freshwater Mussels • Rocklands Carp Screen Project 5. COLERAINE • Fencing off habitat and monitoring of Striped Legless Lizard 2. NORTH OF DERGHOLM • Land Slip Pilot Program • 8 sites determined for sand extraction
Salt Ck
River HARROW
Pigeon ARARAT Chetwynd 1 8 BALMORAL Creek lg Ponds River Glene Creek 2 River Rivulet Good Morning DERGHOLM Bank Bill Creek Mathers GLENELG
Steep River Creek BASIN Creek Wando River
WILLAURA Creek Fiery Wannon CAVENDISH Dwyer Konong Creek W Back annon 5 GLENTHOMPSON CASTERTON COLERAINE Hopkins Bryans 7 DUNKELD Henty LAKE BOLAC 3 Grange Reedy Creek 9 River Creek Burn Greys 6 MERINO Creek Violet Miaki Creek 10 te Creek HAMILTON Boonawah CHATSWORTH Creek Creek Fiery River Cox Creek Burchett
River Kanga
Cree 19 PENSHURST Stokes roo BRANXHOLME
k Darlot River Muston Creek CARAMUT DARTMOOR River PORTLAND Creek Crawford Creek 4 CONDAH Creek Spring Springburn BASIN Moyne Creek Glenelg Eumeralla Blind 11 MACARTHUR Back Moleside Fitzroy MORTLAKE NELSON Creek Hopkins River 14 River HEYWOOD Creek HAWKESDALE Surrey Eumeralla
Creek WOOLSTHORPE
Creek River Darlot River TERANG Creek Mt Emu 17 Drysdale ELINGAMITE 12 Wattle Shaw KOROIT River 16 Hill River Merri River Ck YAMBUK Creek Deep 18 PORTLAND Brucknell 15 13 Creek ALLANSFORD PORT FAIRY WARRNAMBOOL
Numbers on the map refer to key projects.
30 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 6. HAMILTON 10. CHATSWORTH • Grange Burn Wetland Project - 6,000 trees, shrubs and • Chatsworth Landcare Group - ongoing revegetation works on grasses planted, 70 per cent of Hamilton stormwater treated, the Hopkins River 14ha of rehabilitated wetland 11. MORTLAKE 7. GLENTHOMPSON • Watershed 2000 Project, local school students and Moyne • Glenthompson Catchment Group - salinity management Shire - restoration and revegetation of Tea Tree Lake, through revegetation - 22km riparian fencing, 15,000 trees Mortlake and understory planted, 15kg direct seeding. • Fencing off and monitoring population of Corangamite Water Skink 8. ARARAT • Ararat Landcare Group - gorse control works 12. ELINGAMITE, SOUTH OF TERANG • Ararat Hills - Major earthworks & geomorphic study • Elingamite Cobrico Landcare Group - various biodiversity and water quality projects at Lake Cobrico 9. LAKE BOLAC • Hopkins Falls Project (joint project with Hopkins Falls • Inaugural hEELing Walk and Lake Bolac Eel Festival 2005 Landcare Group, Glenelg Hopkins CMA and Moyne Shire) - rehabilitation and restoration work, including viewing ARARAT platforms, weed removal, revegetation and improvement works at public amenities Trewalla
Creek 13. WARRNAMBOOL
Mt Emu Creek Creek • Tozer Reserve Management Plan - development of plan to BEAUFORT Burru control weeds and protect and manage the last remnant mbee t Creek grassy woodland close to Warrnambool Creek • Southern Right Whale Survey
Creek BALLARAT • Warrnambool Coastcare Landcare Group - ongoing Battle Salt revegetation of public land at the Flume beach and HOPKINS foreshore area SKIPTON BASIN 14. HAWKESDALE Creek • Hawkesdale and District Development Action Committee - revegetation of an endangered swamp scrub wetland at Creek APEX Park, Hawkesdale N KILOMETRES 15. PORT FAIRY • South Beach Wetland and Landcare Group - restoration of Powling Street wetlands N K ILOMETRES 16. YAMBUK • South West Orange Bellied Parrot Working Group - monitoring and co-ordinating surveys • Yambuk Estuary and Wetland Management Plan
17. BETWEEN THE SHAW AND EUMERALLA RIVERS Basin breakdown • Friends of Pallisters Reserve Inc - direct seeding wetland, Activity Basin Quantity water quality testing and weed control works
Fencing - Electric Glenelg 11 km 18. PORTLAND Hopkins 6 km • Portland Gorse Control Committee - gorse control works Creek Portland 0 km around Portland urban areas Fencing - standard Glenelg 262 km • Friends of Cape Nelson Coastcare Landcare Inc - fencing off Hopkins 107 km wetland and remnant vegetation area Portland 31 km • replanting provenance plants back into denuded sand dune Vegetation - direct seeding Glenelg 373 km / 19 ha within rare EVC Hopkins 121 km / 21 ha Portland 30 km • Friends of Great South West Walk - track rehabilitation and revegetation works Vegetation - seedlings Glenelg 133,000 trees Hopkins 148,500 trees 19. BRANXHOLME Portland 47,000 trees • Lyne, Camp and Arrandoovong Creeks Land Management Vegetation - tube stock Glenelg 104,500 trees Group - native vegetation enhancement and Spiny Rush Hopkins 36,500 trees removal Portland 5,000 trees
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 31 Corporate Governance and Reporting Requirements CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Corporate Business Program for 2004/2005 was based on a INFORMATION MANAGEMENT systematic approach to key organisational challenges outlined The Glenelg Hopkins CMA continued to develop its Information in the 2004/2005 Corporate Plan. Technology and Information Management Systems during Identification of key themes under a “Business Excellence” the year. framework allowed the organisation to focus on core The Information Management Strategy provides a strategic corporate goals. Significant actions and outcomes highlight the focus and is updated regularly. The main projects undertaken important contribution made by the corporate team to during the year were: organisational goals. • an upgrade of disaster recovery capability • continued upgrading of the website to increase functionality HUMAN RESOURCES • completed integration of remote offices into a centralised IT A significant program of staff training and development was system initiated. This training was linked to gaps and opportunities identified in individual staff appraisals and subsequent annual • completion of a number of database projects aimed at work plans, and substantially increased the organisation’s improving data storage and usage practices performance and efficiency as a result. • increased focus on stability and usability across the The Staff/Management Work Group met quarterly to discuss organisation resulting in improved productivity. improvements to the work environment and initiate safer work These developments provide an excellent platform to enhance practices. These initiatives included improvements to office systems and information management. ventilation, purchase of safety vests and equipment and installation of OH&S noticeboards. EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE PROCESSES Enterprise Agreement No.1 was implemented during 2004/2005 Internal Audit: A successful internal audit program was after being Certified by the Australian Industrial Relations completed in 2004/2005 and proved to be a useful tool in Commission on June 18, 2004. The agreement included several reviewing and improving a range of administrative and measures designed to make the Glenelg Hopkins CMA a family- financial procedures. Matters addressed by reviews included friendly and flexible organisation. These measures included use of corporate credit cards, project management, reporting paid maternity leave, flexible working hours and personal leave to management and taxation compliance. provisions. The first payment increment under the EBA was In addition, monitoring was undertaken on implementation of processed in October, 2004. recommendations from reviews in 2003/2004 in the areas of risk assessment, internal controls, legislative compliance and contract management. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA used the expertise of its internal audit function to identify improvements that will benefit the organisation’s capacity to operate effectively and within modern management practice parameters. Audit Committee: The committee met four times during the year and provided a strong forum for review and assessment of the organisation’s financial and management practices. The committee’s annual works plan focused on monitoring and reviewing the internal audit program and monitoring the results of the 2003/2004 external audit. A joint meeting with the Finance Committee was held, with useful discussion on the respective roles of the two groups. Mr Richard Walter, OAM, is the committee Chairman, with Mr Lex McDowell the second independent community member. Sue Mudford and Lynn Murrell are the Board’s representatives along with non-voting members CEO Colin Dunkley and Corporate Manager Georgie Luckock.
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 33 Corporate Governance and Reporting Requirements
Finance Committee: The Finance Committee met monthly to The indicators provide a valuable snapshot of business activity oversee financial matters before presentation to the Board. and updated information on their status is referred to the Other key roles undertaken during the year included: Board regularly. The data alerts the Board and management of trends and issues and allows adjustments to be made if • providing advice to the Board on financial management appropriate. • the budget development process and budget reviews Financial control: Funding levels and subsequent expenditure • monitoring the monthly financial reports, including commitments were effectively managed through a expenditure reviews comprehensive approach to the financial function of the • resourcing arrangements organisation. Recording and reporting of financial data • reviewing financial statements. continued to be undertaken in a professional and team- oriented manner. The appointment of Mr Babu Chokkappa as The committee comprises Peter Dark (Chairman), Robbie accountant in April added considerable experience and Greene and Sue Mudford and non-voting members CEO Colin expertise to the corporate team. Dunkley and Finance Manager Francis Pekin. Extensive database and other computerised systems have STRATEGIC PLANNING proved invaluable in providing monthly reports to officers, the Finance Committee and Board. This information has allowed Corporate Plan: The 2005/2006 Corporate Plan was submitted stakeholders to make informed decisions on annual budgets, to the Minister for Environment by the required date of May 5, expenditure reviews and project reporting. 2005. The plan is a true working document that provides a blueprint for achieving the Regional Catchment Strategy and The Board-appointed Expenditure Process Review Committee has a specific focus on human resource management, took an active role in determining action plans that ensured community engagement and implementation of integrated expenditure levels met budget targets. The aim was to reduce strategies and plans. factors that could lead to projects not being completed on time, thereby optimising expenditure of project funds. Regional Catchment Investment Plan (RCIP): Significant work went into implementing the 2004/2005 RCIP, reviewing and improving the RCIP process and preparing and providing the 2005/2006 plan to State and Federal Governments. The final version of the RCIP was submitted on May 20 as required and provided a platform for substantial achievement of goals detailed in the Regional Catchment Strategy. The Corporate Program also co-ordinated and submitted the quarterly and annual reporting data to investors for projects funded under the RCIP. These reports were presented in a timely manner and positive feedback was received from government investors.
BUSINESS RESULTS Key Performance Indicators: At its July, 2004, meeting, the Board adopted a series of Key Performance Indicators to monitor business targets. These covered: 1. Finance 2. Increased community participation, awareness and satisfaction 3. Strategy development 4. Natural resource management 5. Staff management 6. Project reporting. • Glenelg Hopkins CMA staff - wetland planting day. (Photo courtesy Linda Jemmett)
34 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
LEGAL STATUS INFORMATION AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION The Glenelg Hopkins CMA was established in July, 1997, under The Glenelg Hopkins CMA has available the following the Water Act 1989 and the Catchment and Land Protection documents as specified in the Financial Management Act 1994: Act 1994 and reports to The Hon. John Thwaites, MP, Minister • publications produced by the Glenelg Hopkins CMA and the for Environment and Minister for Water. places where the publications can be obtained The statutory requirements of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA for • declarations of pecuniary interests duly completed by annual reporting are embodied in the Financial Management relevant officers. These are treated as confidential Act 1994, the Water Act 1989 and the Catchment and Land documents. Protection Act 1994. EXTERNAL REVIEWS COMPETITION POLICY No major external reviews were carried out on the Glenelg The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is not comprised of business units Hopkins CMA. and its operations do not restrict competition. No allegations MAJOR CONTRACTS of non-compliance with government policy were lodged with the organisation for 2004/2005. There were no major contracts in 2004/2005. BEST PRACTICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (FOI) The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is committed to best practice The Freedom of Information Act 1982 allows the public right of management in all aspects of its operations. It seeks to deliver access to documents held by the Glenelg Hopkins CMA. FOI the most effective and efficient service to clients in both direct requests are made in writing describing the documents service delivery and partnership business. This includes requested and including payment of a $21 application fee. staffing, accommodation, resourcing, technology, contracting Further charges may be payable. FOI fees and charges are not and work practices. subject to GST. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA received no requests for information INDUSTRIAL HEALTH AND SAFETY under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 during the The Glenelg Hopkins CMA had one Workcover claim in the year reporting period. 2004/2005. Requests for information should be forwarded to the Freedom APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR STAFF of Information Officer, Georgie Luckock, 79 French Street, Hamilton, 3300. The Principal Officer is Georgie Luckock. The All Glenelg Hopkins CMA employees are appointed following a Authorised Officer is Maurice West. comprehensive selection process involving a multi-gender selection panel. All staff appointments are made on the basis OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY of merit as per the Public Administration Act 2004. The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is committed to Equal Employment The Glenelg Hopkins CMA has in place Occupational Health and Opportunity principles. Safety guidelines. These are contained in a number of policies relating to the health and safety of staff. CONSULTANCIES There were 21 consultancies totalling $138,163 during 2004/2005. None exceeded $100,000.
ORGANISATIONAL FRAMEWORK
BOARD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER LABIC WIC Colin Dunkley
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
LAND & BIODIVERSITY MANAGER WATERWAYS MANAGER CORPORATE MANAGER Don Arnold Janette Lowe Georgie Luckock
SUPPORT STAFF SUPPORT STAFF SUPPORT STAFF
Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 35 Corporate Governance and Reporting Requirements
COMPLIANCE WITH BUILDING ACT 1993 WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT To the best of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s knowledge, the The Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 came into effect on buildings at 79 and 84 French Street, Hamilton, meet relevant January 1, 2002. The Act is designed to protect people who compliance provisions of the Building Act 1993 and Building disclose information about serious wrongdoing within the Regulations 1994. Victorian Public Sector and provide a framework for investigating these matters. BOARD MEMBER MEETING ATTENDANCE The Glenelg Hopkins CMA Board of Directors adopted the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Board member meeting attendance (10) Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 procedures on March 20, Michael Murphy 9 2002 - Resolution Number 0270.00. Peter Dark 9 There have been no disclosures made to the Glenelg Hopkins CMA since commencement of this Act. A copy of the current Cicely Fenton 9 Whistleblowers Procedures have been provided as an insert to Sue Mudford 10 this annual report. Hilary Turner 10 Disclosures of improper conduct by the Glenelg Hopkins CMA Ian Ross 8 or its employees may be made to the following: Heather Builth 7 Georgie Luckock Protected Disclosure Co-ordinator Lynn Murrell (leave of absence Jan-April, 2005) 6 Glenelg Hopkins CMA Terry Lewis 10 79 French Street, Ian Hastings 9 Hamilton, Vic 3300 Telephone: 03 5571 2526 Robert Greene 10 Email: [email protected] Jacinta Ermacora 9 The Ombudsman Victoria Level 22, 459 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000 STATEMENT OF WORKFORCE Telephone: 03 9613 6222 Glenelg Hopkins CMA workforce (as at June 30, 2005) Toll free: 1800 806 314
2005 Female 19 Male 21 Total 40 Full-time CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES 2004 Female 24 Male 20 Total 44 The Glenelg Hopkins CMA is committed to policies, programs and strategies aimed at delivering culturally appropriate 2005 Female 13 Male 3 Total 16 Part-time services to all Victorians. Current practices of inclusive and 2004 Female 4 Male 2 Total 6 thorough public consultation ensure that all persons who have an interest in investigations are kept informed and have ROLES OF SENIOR OFFICERS the opportunity to have input into the organisation’s The three Program Managers who report directly to the Chief deliberations. This includes the work carried out by the Glenelg Executive Officer have responsibility for Corporate, Waterways Hopkins CMA’s Community Landcare Facilitator, as outlined and Land and Biodiversity management. See the organisational previously in the report. structure on page 35.
36 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 Financial Performance at a Glance Financial Performance at a Glance
Financial Performance at a glance 14,000 Total Revenue 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Expenditure 12,000 ($,000) ($,000) ($,000) ($,000) ($,000) Surplus (Deficit)
Total Revenue 4,172 7,568 10,321 13,025 13,638 10,000
Total Expenditure 4,247 7,489 9,039 12,570 12,752 8,000
Surplus (Deficit) 6,000 for the year (75) 79 1,282 455 886 ($,000) 4,000 Total Assets 3,404 3,539 4,965 5,761 6,904 2,000 Total Liabilities 247 302 447 622 880 0 The detailed financial statements for 2004/2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 are contained in a supporting document. -2,000
OPERATING EXPENDITURE 2004/2005 (BY PROGRAM)
Governance 2.77% Regional Sustainability 0.67% Waterways 48.22% Corporate 11.58%
Land and Biodiversity 36.76%
Total expenditure $12.75 million Corporate costs include $108,155 relating to the written down value of assets disposed.
Governance: Policy and strategic direction setting, Financial Performance Measure consultation and partnerships with community, State and local government. 2002 2003 2004 2005 Corporate: Resources, human resources, financial Corporate and Governance costs management and community communications. as a % of total expenditure 15.9 13.4 11.8 14.4 Waterways: Sustainable and integrated management of Onground works as a % water resources and lands adjacent to waterways. of total expenditure NA 39.7 33.1 42.7 Land and Biodiversity: Sustainable and integrated management of soils, flora and fauna, pest plants and pest animals to achieve a healthy ecosystem. Regional Sustainability: To align the efforts of stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the Regional Catchment Strategy and links to Landcare.
38 Successes and Achievements 2004/2005 MAJOR CHANGES Apart from an increase in the size of the organisation’s operations, there were no major changes during the year.
BUDGET Detailed information about Program and Corporate Income and Expenditure is shown in notes 2 & 3 of the financial statements. In 2004/2005, the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s total budgeted expenditure was $14.3 million. Expenditure achieved was $12.75 million, which is slightly higher than last year.
EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE To the best of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA’s knowledge, there were no events subsequent to the balance date that will significantly affect operations.
companion report
Financial Statements ~ year ended 30 June 2005
Glenelg Hopkins CMA 79 French Street, Hamilton, Vic 3300 Tel: (03) 5571 2526 Fax: (03) 5571 2935 www.glenelg-hopkins.vic.gov.au GSDM7164 09/05
Financial Statements ~ year ended 30 June 2005
Financial Statements ~ year ended 30 June 2005
Certification to the Financial Statements 4
Auditor-General’s Report 5
Statement of Financial Performance 6
Statement of Financial Position 7
Statement of Cash Flows 8
Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements 9
Disclosure Index 22
Financial Statements 2004/2005 03 CERTIFICATION TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We hereby certify that the financial statements of the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority, comprising a statement of financial performance, statement of financial position, statement of cash flows and notes to the financial statements, have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Management Act 1994, applicable Australian Accounting Standards and other mandatory professional reporting requirements. In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly the financial transactions for the year and the financial position of the Authority as at 30 June 2005. At the date of signing, we are not aware of any circumstances that would render any particulars included in the financial statements to be misleading or inaccurate. Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Management dated 24th August 2005.
Michael Murphy Colin Dunkley Chairman Chief Executive Officer (Accountable Officer)
Francis Pekin Finance Manager
Dated: 1st September 2005
04 Financial Statements 2004/2005 AUDITOR GENERAL VICTORIA
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority To the Members of the Parliament of Victoria and Members of the Board of the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority Scope The Financial Report The accompanying financial report for the financial year ended 30 June 2005 of Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority consists of the statement of financial performance, statement of financial position, statement of cash flows, notes to and forming part of the financial report, and the supporting declaration. Members’ Responsibility The Members of the Board of Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority are responsible for: • the preparation and presentation of the financial report and the information it contains, including accounting policies and accounting estimates • the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to record its transactions and affairs, and prevent and detect fraud and errors. Audit Approach As required by the Audit Act 1994, an independent audit has been carried out in order to express an opinion of the financial report. The audit has been conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The audit procedures included: • examining information on a test basis to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report • assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used, and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the members • obtaining written confirmation regarding the material representations made in conjunction with the audit • reviewing the overall presentation of information in the financial report. These procedures have been undertaken to form an opinion as to whether the financial report is presented in all material respects fairly in accordance with Accounting Standards and other mandatory professional reporting requirements in Australia, and the financial reporting requirements of the Financial Management Act 1994, so as to present a view which is consistent with my understanding of the Authority’s financial position, and its financial performance and cash flows. The audit opinion expressed in this report has been formed on the above basis.
Independence The Auditor-General’s independence is established by the Constitution Act 1975. The Auditor-General is not subject to direction by any person about the way in which his powers are to be exercised. The Auditor-General and his staff and delegates comply with all applicable independence requirements of the Australian accounting profession.
Audit Opinion In my opinion, the financial report presents fairly in accordance with applicable Accounting Standards and other mandatory professional reporting requirements in Australia, and the financial reporting requirements of the Financial Management Act 1994, the financial position of the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority as at 30 June 2005 and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended.
MELBOURNE J.W. CAMERON 1 September 2005 Auditor-General
Victorian Auditor-General’s Office Level 34, 140 Williams Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000 Telephone (03) 8601 7000 Facsimile (03) 8601 7010 Email [email protected] Website www.audit.vic.gov.au
Auditing in the Public Interest
Financial Statements 2004/2005 05 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE For the year ended 30 June 2005
Note 2005 2004 $$
Revenue from Operating Activities Government Contributions 2.1 13,030,493 12,347,403 Other Contributions & Charges 2.2 291,621 197,150 Total Revenue from Operating Activities 13,322,114 12,544,553
Revenue from Outside Operating Activities Investment Income 2.3 206,020 334,434 Disposal of Non-Current Assets 2.4 109,756 146,400 Total Revenue from Outside Operating Activities 315,776 480,834
TOTAL REVENUE FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 12 13,637,890 13,025,387
Operating Expenditure Programme Expenditure 3.1 10,921,619 11,082,431 Corporate Expenditure 3.2 1,722,024 1,332,569 Total Operating Expenditure 12,643,643 12,415,000
Expenditure Relating to Outside Operating Activities Disposal of Non-Current Assets 3.3 108,155 155,653 Total Expenditure Relating to Outside Operating Activities 108,155 155,653
TOTAL EXPENDITURE FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 12,751,798 12,570,653
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 886,092 454,734
Movements in Equity Increase / (decrease) in Asset Revaluation Reserve 1(h) - 165,934
TOTAL CHANGE IN EQUITY OTHER THAN THOSE RESULTING FROM TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS AS OWNERS 886,092 620,668
The above Statement of Financial Performance should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
06 Financial Statements 2004/2005 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION As at 30 June 2005
Note 2005 2004 $$
Current Assets Cash Assets 4 5,184,002 4,476,286 Receivables 5 16,828 221,583 Other Financial Assets 6 - 7,646 Total Current Assets 5,200,830 4,705,515
Non-Current Assets Property, Plant & Equipment 7 1,703,873 1,055,523 Total Non-Current Assets 1,703,873 1,055,523
TOTAL ASSETS 12 6,904,703 5,761,038
Current Liabilities Payables 8 573,321 399,430 Provisions 9 157,420 114,811 Total Current Liabilities 730,741 514,241
Non-Current Liabilities Provisions 9 149,054 107,981 Total Non-Current Liabilities 149,054 107,981
TOTAL LIABILITIES 879,795 622,222
NET ASSETS 6,024,908 5,138,816
Equity Contributed Capital 10 3,156,946 3,156,946 Accumulated Surplus 11 2,702,028 1,815,936 Asset Revaluation Reserve 1(h) 165,934 165,934
TOTAL EQUITY 6,024,908 5,138,816
Capital and other Commitments 12 Contingent Liabilities 13
The above Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 07 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the year ended 30 June 2005
Note 2005 2004 $$
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Receipts Government Contributions 12 13,139,446 12,293,490 Other Contributions and Charges 291,621 144,270 Interest Received 210,611 327,899
Payments Employee Entitlements (2,892,961) (2,028,418) Interest & Other Financing Costs Paid (2,158) (6,669) Payments to Suppliers (9,154,772) (9,960,570)
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 14.1 1,591,787 770,002
Cash Flows from Investing Activities Payments for Property, Plant & Equipment (993,827) (279,095) Proceeds from Sale of Non-current Assets 109,756 146,400
NET CASH FROM/(USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES (884,071) (132,695)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities Payments for Interest Bearing Liabilities - (80,709)
NET CASH FROM/(USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES - (80,709)
NET INCREASE / (DECREASE) IN CASH 707,716 556,598
Opening Cash 4,476,286 3,919,688
CLOSING CASH 14.2 5,184,002 4,476,286
The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
08 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the year ended 30 June 2005
FORMATION OF THE AUTHORITY The Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority was constituted on 1 July 1997 by Order of the Minister for Agriculture and Resources to oversee land and water resources in the Authority’s catchment area. On the same date, the Glenelg River Improvement Trust was abolished, and the responsibilities of the Trust were transferred to the Authority, together with any assets and liabilities of the Trust. The Trust had no liabilities that transferred to the Authority. The Authority is based at 79 French Street Hamilton, Victoria. The parent entity of the Authority is the State Government of Victoria.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES The Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority is a strategic regional organisation with a charter to facilitate integrated catchment management. Our key partnerships are with the regional community and agencies, local, state and federal governments, together with landcare which plays a key role in natural resource management. Community education and awareness are high on the Authority’s agenda. Expanding our knowledge and partnerships across the region will result in the environmental, economic and social sustainability of our catchments.
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a). Basis of Accounting The financial statements of the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority are a general purpose financial report prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Management Act 1994, applicable Australian Accounting Standards, and other mandatory professional reporting requirements (Urgent Issue Group Consensus Views). The financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis and in accordance with the historical cost convention. The accounting policies adopted in preparing the financial statements are consistent with those of the previous year, except where otherwise stated. Comparatives have been adjusted where necessary to enhance comparability in conformity with any changes in presentation and disclosure. All amounts shown in the financial statements are expressed to the nearest dollar.
(b). Investments Investments are brought to account at cost with interest revenue recognised in the statement of financial performance when it is earned. All investments that are expected to be disposed of within twelve months of balance date are classified as current assets, and all others are classified as non-current assets.
(c). Revenue Recognition Revenue is brought to account when services have been provided. Government contributions are recognised as revenues when control over the contribution is obtained. The value of all goods and services received free of charge are recognised as revenue when the Authority gains control of them. The benefits derived from these goods and services are recorded at their fair values in the financial statements. Any grants and contributions received from the Victorian State Government which the Minister for Finance or the Minister for Water and Environment have indicated are in the nature of owners’ contributions, are accounted for as Equity - Contributed Capital. In accounting for the sale of fixed assets, gross proceeds from the sales are included as other revenue and the written down value of the assets sold is disclosed as an operating expense.
(d). Bad and Doubtful Debts A provision is made for any doubtful debts, based on a review of all outstanding receivables at balance date. Bad debts are written off in the period in which they are identified.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 09 Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
(e). Employee Entitlements The calculation of employee entitlements includes all relevant on-costs. Wages and Salaries, Annual Leave and Sick Leave Liabilities for wages and salaries and annual leave are recognised and measured as the amount unpaid, including oncosts, at expected pay rates in respect of employees’ services up to balance date. Non-vesting sick leave is not expected to exceed current and future sick leave entitlements, and accordingly, no liability is recognised in these financial statements. Long Service Leave A liability for long service leave is recognised and is measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, and likelihood of remaining at the Authority for a period enabling eligibility for Long Service Leave. Expected future payments are discounted using interest rates on national Government guaranteed securities with terms to maturity that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash flows. The nominal amount of long service leave expected to be paid in the next financial year is included as a current liability. (There is no such current liability applicable to the current financial year.) Superannuation The purpose of a superannuation scheme is to accumulate assets to meet members' benefits as they accrue. The Authority contributes in respect of its employees to superannuation schemes administered by the Government Superannuation Office, Local Authorities Superannuation Scheme, Recruitment Super, Fifth Corp and AMP Personal Superannuation. The amounts of these contributions are determined by each scheme's actuary in accordance with statutory requirements. The Authority’s statutory contributions to these schemes are recorded as a superannuation expense (see Note 15). There are no unfunded liabilities in respect of those employees who are members of the above schemes.
(f). Leases Leases have been reported according to the requirements of AAS17, and are categorised between finance leases and operating leases. Finance leases effectively transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased non-current assets from the lessor to the lessee whereas under an operating lease, the lessor effectively retains all such risks and benefits. Where a non-current asset is acquired by means of a finance lease, the minimum lease payments are discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease. The discounted amount is established as a non-current asset at the beginning of the lease term and is amortised on a straight line basis over its expected economic life. A corresponding liability is established and each lease payment is allocated between a principal and interest component. Principal payments are deducted from the lease liability and the interest payment is recorded as an expense in the statement of financial performance. Operating lease payments are representative of the pattern of benefits derived from the leased assets, and accordingly are charged against revenue in the periods in which they are incurred.
(g). Fixed Assets Fixed assets include land, buildings, catchment infrastructure, plant, equipment, furniture and motor vehicles. Items with a cost or value in excess of $500 and a useful life to the Authority of more than one year, are capitalised. All other assets acquired are included as an expense for the period. Fixed assets are brought to account at cost of acquisition, or in the case of assets acquired at no cost, at a fair value determined by the Authority in conjunction with the grantor, at the date they are acquired. The cost of fixed assets constructed by the Authority includes all direct labour and materials used in the construction, together with an appropriate proportion of applicable overheads.
10 Financial Statements 2004/2005 (h). Valuation of Fixed Assets In accordance with Victorian Government Policy "Revaluation of Non-Current Physical Assets" (the Policy) issued in response to AASB1041, the Authority measures Buildings and Land at fair value, and plant, equipment and motor vehicles at cost less depreciation. Land and Buildings A formal revaluation of land and buildings was undertaken by G.D. Linke, AAPI (Val) as at 30 June 2004. The increase in value of $165,934 was shown in the Asset Revaluation Reserve. In accordance with the Policy, the Authority will formally revalue Land and Buildings every three years (revaluation due June 2007). Depreciation provision of 2% per annum will be charged. Plant and Equipment and Motor Vehicles Plant and equipment and motor vehicles, although measured at cost less depreciation, are reviewed to ensure that the carrying amount of an asset does not differ materially from its recoverable amount at the reporting date.
(i). Depreciation of Non-Current Assets Non-current assets with limited useful lives are systematically depreciated over their useful lives to the Authority in a manner that reflects the consumption of the service potential embodied in those assets. Straight line depreciation is provided, based on the residual useful life as determined on a regular basis, with the life of major items being reviewed each year. Additions to non-current assets in the financial year are depreciated from their respective dates of acquisition. Works in progress are not depreciated until taken up as a non-current asset. Depreciation rates currently applied to each class of asset are as follows: Catchment Infrastructure: 1% to 5% Furniture & Fittings: 10% to 20% Plant & Equipment: 20% to 25% Motor Vehicles: 20% Office Equipment & Communications: 10% to 40% Buildings and Improvements: 2%
(j). Statement of Cash Flows For the purpose of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash includes cash on hand, cash at bank and highly liquid investments, net of any bank overdraft. The cash flows from operating activities section has been grossed up for GST. For the Authority, in addition to cash at bank, this includes Term Deposits (since they will mature in three months or less and are hence considered highly liquid).
(k) Impacts of adopting Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards For the reporting period ending 30 June 2006, the organisation is required to adopt the financial reporting requirements for the Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (A-IFRS). The financial report for the reporting period ending 30 June 2006 will require comparatives as at 30 June 2005 and hence will require opening balances for the financial year commencing 1 July 2004 to be determined. The opening balances are to be adjusted to reflect the position that would have existed had A-IFRS always applied and such retrospective adjustments will be made against opening retained earnings. There are requirements under A-IFRS that apply specifically to not-for-profit entities that are not consistent with the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards. As the organisation is a not-for-profit entity those paragraphs in A-IFRS application to not-for-profit entitles will be applied. The organisation’s A-IFRS compliant financial reporting for the reporting period ending 30 June 2006 will include a new statement of changes in equity in addition to the three existing financial statements, which will be renamed. The Statement of Financial Performance will be renamed as the Operating Statement, the Statement of Financial Position will be renamed as the Balance Sheet and the Statement of Cash Flows will be renamed as the Cash Flow Statement. Further, following the completion of the organisation’s impact analysis and evaluation of accounting policy alternatives, the organisation has concluded that there will not be a significant impact on the organisation’s financial position and financial performance following the adoption of A-IFRS. This financial report has been prepared in accordance with existing Australian accounting standards and other mandatory professional reporting requirements.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 11 Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
NOTE 2 - REVENUE FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 2005 2004 $$
2.1 GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS Federal 3,113,759 1,931,900 State 3,987,236 4,041,196 National Action Plan 5,929,498 6,374,307 Total 13,030,493 12,347,403
2.2 OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS & CHARGES Other Income 89,904 0 Project Contributions 201,717 197,150 Total 291,621 197,150
2.3 INVESTMENT INCOME Interest 206,020 334,434 Total 206,020 334,434
2.4 DISPOSAL OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS Proceeds from Sale of Non-current Assets 109,756 146,400 Total 109,756 146,400
TOTAL REVENUE* 13,637,890 13,025,387
* Commitments There are funds received in 2004/05 financial year ($3.33 million) relating to expenditure that has not yet taken place. Refer to Note 12 - Commitments, for further information regarding obligations of the Authority at reporting date.
12 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTE 3 - TOTAL EXPENDITURE FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES 2005 2004 $$
3.1 PROGRAMME EXPENDITURE (a) Employee Costs 2,202,164 1,745,754 Direct Costs 8,616,836 9,182,647 Depreciation 102,619 150,892 Financing - 3,138 Total 10,921,619 11,082,431
3.2 CORPORATE EXPENDITURE Employee Costs 730,903 549,570 Depreciation 134,702 57,269 Financing 2,158 2,807 Governance - Board 253,873 224,140 Governance - Implementation Committees 99,227 67,634 Audit Fees 3,730 3,600 Administration 497,431 427,549 Total 1,722,024 1,332,569
3.3 DISPOSAL OF NON-CURRENT ASSETS Written Down Value of Assets Disposed 108,155 155,653 Total 108,155 155,653
TOTAL EXPENSES 12,751,798 12,570,653
a) Programme Expenditure comprises those costs relating directly to fulfilment of the catchment management obligations of the Authority. Such costs include community grants, environmental contract works, and expenditure incurred to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the Waterways, Land & Biodiversity and Regional Sustainability programmes. This does not include costs associated with the management or running of the Authority itself (included in Corporate Expenditure).
Financial Statements 2004/2005 13 Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
NOTE 4 - CASH ASSETS 2005 2004 $$
Cash 884,002 776,286 Term Deposits 4,300,000 3,700,000
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 5,184,002 4,476,286
The above investments for 2004/05 comprise of three Term Deposits, which will mature in July 2005.
NOTE 5 - RECEIVABLES & ACCRUED INCOME 2005 2004 $$
Sundry Debtors 14,883 91,212 Accrued Income 1,945 130,371
TOTAL RECEIVABLES 16,828 221,583
Where collection of the debt is doubtful, a provision for doubtful debts is recognised for the estimated shortfall in recovery. There is no provision necessary in the current year.
NOTE 6 - OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS 2005 2004 $$
Prepayments - 7,646
TOTAL OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS - 7,646
14 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTE 7 - FIXED ASSETS
Land Buildings Motor Vehicles Plant Furniture TOTAL & Improvements & Equipment & Fittings 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 $ $$$$$$$$$ $$
WDV 1 July 115,000 65,000 420,946 311,579 219,691 254,283 243,760 288,722 56,126 58,849 1,055,523 978,433 Additions 150,000 - 310,873 - 299,180 172,481 172,163 101,147 61,611 5,467 993,827 279,095 Revaluation Increments 50,000 - 115,934 - - - - 165,934 Disposals - - - (104,864) (152,190) (3,292) (3,463) - - (108,156) (155,653) Depreciation - (13,290) (6,567) (72,335) (54,883) (141,981) (142,646) (9,715) (8,190) (237,321) (212,286) WDV 30 June 265,000 115,000 718,529 420,946 341,672 219,691 270,650 243,760 108,022 56,126 1,703,873 1,055,523
Assets at Cost 150,000 - 349,064 38,191 416,443 265,185 741,425 589,911 149,638 88,027 1,806,570 981,314 Assets at Revaluation 115,000 115,000 385,000 385,000 ------500,000 500,000 Less Acc Depn - - (15,535) (2,245) (74,771) (45,494) (470,775) (346,151) (41,616) (31,901) (602,697) (425,791) WDV 30 June 265,000 115,000 718,529 420,946 341,672 219,691 270,650 243,760 108,022 56,126 1,703,873 1,055,523
NOTE 8 - PAYABLES 2005 2004 $ $
Payables Accounts Payable 177,905 239,676 Accrued Expenses 226,436 159,754 Net GST payable 168,980 -
TOTAL PAYABLES 573,321 399,430
Financial Statements 2004/2005 15
Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
NOTE 9 - PROVISIONS 2005 2004 $$
Current Annual Leave 157,420 114,811 Total Current Provisions 157,420 114,811
Non-Current Annual Leave 27,500 19,740 Long Service Leave 121,554 88,241 Total Non-Current Provisions 149,054 107,981
TOTAL PROVISIONS 306,474 222,792
NOTE 10 - CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL 2005 2004 $$
Contributed Capital Opening Balance 3,156,946 3,156,946
TOTAL CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL 3,156,946 3,156,946
NOTE 11 - ACCUMULATED SURPLUS 2005 2004 $ $
Accumulated Surplus at beginning of the Year 1,815,936 1,361,202 Surplus / (Deficit) from Ordinary Activities 886,092 454,734
ACCUMULATED SURPLUS AT END OF THE YEAR 2,702,028 1,815,936
16 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTE 12 - CAPITAL AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
Capital Commitments As at 30th June 2005, the Authority had no outstanding capital commitments.
Commitments Against Current Cash Balances a) At 30 June 2005, the Authority had contracted to fund specific catchment management projects (primarily by way of community grants) with a value of $658,959 from revenues derived to the year ended 30 June 2005. b) In addition to the contracted grant and other agreements noted above, government funds have been received by the Authority on the basis that the Authority will spend these funds on specific project areas. These ‘tied’ funds amount to $2,670,331. The total commitment against cash and investments at 30th June 2005, comprising current agreements and expenditure of ‘tied’ funds noted above, was $3,329,290 (2003/04 $2,346,360). No provision for the payment of these commitments has been made in the financial statements. However, cash balances reported in these financial statements of $5,184,002 are sufficient to cover the obligations for which funds have been received (items (a) and (b) above), in addition to meeting the reported liabilities of the Authority at 30th June of $879,795.
NOTE 13 - CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Authority is aware of no contingent liabilities as at 30th June 2005
NOTE 14 - STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS 2005 2004 $ $
14.1 RECONCILIATION OF NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES TO OPERATING SURPLUS / (DEFICIT)
Operating Result 886,092 454,734 Depreciation and amortisation 237,321 212,286 (Profit) Loss from disposal of non-current assets (1,600) 9,253
Change in operating assets and liabilities Decrease (increase) in receivables 204,755 (188,363) Decrease (increase) in other financial assets 7,646 26,381 Increase (decrease) in payables 173,891 202,014 Increase (decrease) in provisions 83,682 53,697
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 1,591,787 770,002
14.2 CASH Cash at Bank 884,002 776,286 Investments 4,300,000 3,700,000
TOTAL CASH * 5,184,002 4,476,286
Cash at the end of the year, as shown in the Statement of Cash Flows, is reconciled to the related items in the statement of financial position as above. The Authority has no credit standby arrangements and no unused loan facilities. *There are funds received in 2004/05 financial year ($3.33 million) relating to expenditure that has not yet taken place. Refer to Note 12 - Commitments, for further information regarding obligations of the Authority at reporting date.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 17 Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
NOTE 15 - SUPERANNUATION
15.1 CONTRIBUTIONS The Authority contributes, in respect of its employees, to the following superannuation schemes:
Type of Scheme Rate % 2005 2004 $$
Superannuation Contributions Made Government Superannuation Office Defined Benefits 17.00 13,461 12,076 Vision Superannuation Scheme Defined Benefits 9.25 13,417 13,682 Vision Superannuation Scheme Accumulation 9.00 193,124 190,969 AMP Personal Superannuation Accumulation 9.00 3,115 2,527 Recruitment Superannuation Accumulation 9.00 - 720 Fifth Corp Superannuation Accumulation 9.00 8,604 5,030 Australian Primary Superannuation Fund Accumulation 9.00 3,725 2,587 Australian Ethical Superannuation Fund Accumulation 9.00 3,760 3,242 A & M Bassett Superannuation Fund Accumulation 9.00 284 25,236 Nationwide Superannuation Fund Accumulation 9.00 3,413 1,781 Health Super Accumulation 9.00 3,500 720 Statewide Super Fund Accumulation 9.00 720 720 VicSuper Fund Accumulation 9.00 5,534 4,683 Colonial First State Accumulation 9.00 706 2,142 MLC Accumulation 9.00 3,654 - ME & SI Mudford Super Fund Accumulation 9.00 720 - JUST Super Accumulation 9.00 2,763 - ANZ Personal Super Accumulation 9.00 351 -
TOTAL SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTIONS 260,851 266,115
All Superannuation contributions for 2004/05 were made prior to 30th June 2005.
15.2 UNFUNDED SUPERANNUATION LIABILITIES There are no unfunded superannuation liabilities attributable to the Authority in respect of the two defined benefit schemes.
18 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTE 16 - RESPONSIBLE PERSONS RELATED DISCLOSURES
16.1 RESPONSIBLE PERSONS The names of persons who were Responsible Persons at anytime during the financial year were:
Relevant Ministers The Hon J Thwaites, Minister for Environment and Minister for Water
Board Members Michael Murphy Hilary Turner Ian Ross Lynn Murrell Peter Dark Susan Mudford Cicely Fenton Ian Hastings Heather Builth Robert Greene Terry Lewis Jacinta Ermacora
Accountable Officer Colin Dunkley
16.2 REMUNERATION OF RESPONSIBLE PERSONS Remuneration received, or due and receivable, from the Authority in connection with the management of the Authority.
2005 2004 $$
REMUNERATION 87,999 95,350
The number of Responsible Persons whose remuneration from the Authority was within the specified bands, is as follows:
2005 2004 $ No. No.
0 - 9,999 11 12 10,000 - 19,999 11
There were two Responsible Persons who are employed by the Department of Sustainability and Environment and Department of Primary Industries who do not receive sitting fees from the CMA. The relevant Minister’s remuneration is reported separately in the financial statements of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. The remuneration of the Executive Officer is described separately at Note 16.4.
16.3 RETIREMENT BENEFITS OF RESPONSIBLE PERSONS During the reporting period, Board Members were paid as employees. Hence contributions towards superannuation, at the rate of 9%, were made. This amounted to $7,919 (2004 $8,556) and is included in Note 15.1 Superannuation Contributions.
16.4 EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REMUNERATION There was one executive officer, or Responsible Person, whose total remuneration was in the band $120,000 - $130,000. Total remuneration for the reporting period of executive officers included above amounted to $121,937.
16.5 OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH RESPONSIBLE PERSONS AND THEIR RELATED ENTITIES There were no other transactions between the Authority and responsible persons.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 19 Notes to and forming part of the Financial Statements
NOTE 17 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
17.1 TERMS, CONDITIONS AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Authority’s accounting policies including the terms and conditions of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument, both recognised and unrecognised at balance date, are as follows:
Recognised Financial Notes Accounting Policies Terms and Conditions Instruments
(i) Financial Assets Receivables 5 Debtors are carried at the nominal Receivables include sundry debtors and are amounts due less any provision for expected to be recovered within 3 months. doubtful debts. A doubtful debts provision is made for any amounts that The amounts do not earn interest. are considered unlikely to be collectable.
Investments 4 Short Term Deposits are carried at their Short Term Deposits have an average maturity principal amounts. Interest revenue is of 30 days from the end of financial year, and recognised in the Statement of Financial effective interest rate of 5.47% (2004 5.47%) Performance when it is earned.
Cash 4 Cash is stated at its nominal amount. The Authority does not have an overdraft facility. Surplus Authority funds are held in an interest bearing bank account. Interest being earned on cash deposits was 5.0% at 30th June 2005.
(i) Financial Liabilities Accounts Payable 8 Creditors and accruals are recognised for Settlement of creditors is normally effected within future amounts to be paid in respect of a 30 day period. goods and services received, whether or not billed to the authority.
20 Financial Statements 2004/2005 NOTE 17 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (cont.)
17.2 INTEREST RATE RISK The Authority’s exposure to interest rate risks and the effective interest rates of financial assets and financial liabilities, both recognised and unrecognised at the balance date, are as follows:
Fixed Interest maturing in: Financial Floating 1 year or less More than Non-interest Total Carrying Weighted Instruments Interest Rate 1 Year & less Bearing Amount per Average than 5 Years Statement of Effective Financial Position Interest Rate
2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 $$ $ $$$$$ $ $%%
(i) Financial Assets Cash 884,002 776,286 884,002 776,286 5.00 4.85 Receivables 16,828 221,583 16,828 221,583 Nil Nil Investments 4,300,000 3,700,000 4,300,000 3,700,000 5.47 5.47
(ii) Financial liabilities Payables 573,321 399,430 573,321 399,430 Nil Nil
The entity’s exposure to interest rate risk would mainly arise from any financial assets and financial liabilities which are held to maturity and bear fixed interest rates.
17.3 NET FAIR VALUES The carrying amount of all financial assets and liabilities is the net fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, both recognised and unrecognised at balance date, of the Authority. The following methods and assumptions are used to determine the net fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities:
Recognised Financial Instruments
Cash
Investments Creditors & Accruals These financial instruments have a short-term to maturity. Accordingly, it is considered that carrying amounts reflect fair values. Receivables
17.4 CREDIT RISK EXPOSURES The Authority’s maximum exposure to credit risk at balance date for each class of recognised financial assets, is the carrying amount of those assets as disclosed in the statement of financial position.
Concentrations of credit risk In terms of its trade receivables, the Authority’s customers are concentrated in Victoria, Australia. Major customers are the Victorian State Government and Victorian Public bodies. Credit risk is minimised by the large numbers of customers receiving the Authority’s services. In addition the Authority’s debt management procedures allow only 30 days credit from the date of invoicing and a follow-up process which will refer outstanding receivables to a debt collection agency if there is no response to reminder notices, within 21 days after the credit term. A provision for doubtful debts is raised for any debts where there is doubt regarding their collection.
Bad Debt Write-off During the year ended 30th June 2005, no debts of the Authority were considered uncollectable and no debts were written off.
Financial Statements 2004/2005 21 DISCLOSURE INDEX
DISCLOSURE INDEX REQUIREMENTS
The Annual Report of the Glenelg Hopkins CMA is prepared in accordance with all relevant Victorian legislation. This index has been prepared to facilitate identification of the authority’s compliance with statutory disclosure requirements.
Legislation Requirement Page No.
Charter and purpose - refer to Successes and Achievement document FRD 22 Manner of establishment and the relevant Ministers 5 FRD 22 Objectives, functions, powers and duties 5 FRD 22 Nature and range of services provided 5-31
Management and structure - refer to Successes and Achievement document FRD 22 Organisational structure 35 FRD 22 Names of Board Members/major committees 8,10-13,36
Financial and other information - refer to Successes and Achievement document FRD 22 Statement of workforce data and merit and equity 36 FRD 22 Summary of the financial results for the year 38 FRD 22 Significant changes in financial position during the year 38,39 FRD 22 Operational and budgetary objectives and performance against objectives 6-39 FRD 22 Major changes or factors affecting performance 39 FRD 22 Subsequent events 39 FRD 22 Application and operation of Freedom of Information Act 1982 35 FRD 22 Application and operation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 36 FRD 22 Compliance with building and maintenance provisions of Building Act 1993 36 FRD 22 Statement on National Competition Policy 35 FRD 22 Details of consultancies over $100,000 35 FRD 22 Details of consultancies under $100,000 35 FRD 12 Disclosure of major contracts 35 FRD 22 Statement of availability of other information 35 FRD 22 Occupational health and safety 35 FRD 15 Executive officer disclosures FS 19 FRD 10 Disclosure index FS 22
Financial statements required under Part 7 of the FMA SD 4.2(c) Compliance with Australian accounting standards and other authoritative pronouncements FS 9-11 SD 4.2(c) Compliance with Ministerial Directions FS 4 SD 4.2(d) Rounding of amounts FS 9 SD 4.2(c) Accountable officer’s declaration FS 4 SD 4.2(f) Model Financial Report NA SD 4.2(b) Statement of financial performance FS 6 SD 4.2(b) Statement of financial position FS 7 SD 4.2(b) Statement of cash flows during the year FS 8
Other disclosures in notes to the financial statements FRD 11 Disclosure of ex-gratia payments Nil FRD 21 Responsible person and executive officer disclosures FS 19 FRD 23 Superannuation liabilities and disclosure FS 10
22 Financial Statements 2004/2005 Financial Statements 2004/2005 23 Glenelg Hopkins CMA 79 French Street, Hamilton, Vic 3300 Tel: (03) 5571 2526 Fax: (03) 5571 2935 www.glenelg-hopkins.vic.gov.au GSDM7165 09/05