DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2016 Industry Outlook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2015 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2016 Industry Outlook General Aviation Manufacturers Association General aviation is defined as all aviation other than military and scheduled commercial airlines. General Aviation: U Includes over 362,000 general aviation aircraft U In the U.S., flies almost 23 million hours, of flying worldwide today, ranging from two- which two-thirds are for business purposes. seat training aircraft and utility helicopters to intercontinental business jets, of which over U Flies to more than 5,000 U.S. public 204,000 aircraft are based in the United States airports, while scheduled airlines serve less and over 110,000 aircraft are based in Europe. than 400 airports. The European general aviation fleet can access over 4,200 airports. U Supports $219 billion in total economic output and 1.1 million total jobs in the United States. U Is the primary training arena for most commercial airline pilots. GAMA is an international trade association representing more than 90 of the world’s leading manufacturers of general aviation airplanes and rotorcraft, engines, avionics, components, and related services. GAMA’s members also operate repair stations, fixed-based operations, pilot and maintenance training facilities, and manage fleets of aircraft. For more information, visit GAMA’s Web site at www.GAMA.aero and look for us on Facebook and LinkedIn. Welcome from GAMA’s Chairman ’m very pleased to present to you GAMA’s 2015 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2016 Industry Outlook. Chock full of the latest information as well as historical Istatistics, this Databook is considered the industry resource on general aviation (GA) data. The book in your hands includes the most current information on GA shipments and billings, GA fleet and flight activity, the pilot community, airports and aeronautical facilities, and GA safety information. It’s an in-depth Ài>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊL°ÊÊ ÛiLiÀÊÓä£x]Ê look that shows just how expansive the GAMA wrote to four transportation Chairman’s Objectives GA marketplace is in today’s world. leaders in the U.S. Congress outlining for 2016 our priorities to be included in the bill, In the book’s opening pages, you’ll find especially certification reform. You can In 2016, GAMA seeks to accomplish highlights of GAMA’s activities in 2015. read the letter on page 2. the following goals: It was quite a year, as the association UÊÊ*ÕÀÃÕiÊ«ÀÛiiÌÃÊ>`Êi>LiÊ reached a record number of member I also want to share with you GAMA’s other priorities for this year, which are innovation in general and business companies and created an entirely aviation to enhance safety new associate membership category listed in the box to the right. As you for companies developing hybrid and can see, we have a lot of work ahead of UÊÊ>VÌ>ÌiÊ«ÀÛiiÌÃÊÊÌ iÊ electric propulsion aircraft. In addition, us, and I look forward to our continued effectiveness and efficiency of progress on these important topics. Ê«>Þi`Ê>Êi>`ÊÀiÊÊÀ}>â}Ê global civil aviation authorities the historic Arsenal of Democracy: in conducting their certification, I hope you’ll be as proud as I am of World War II Victory Capitol Flyover in operational, and maintenance GAMA’s work as you read through this oversight responsibilities, and Washington, DC that marked 70 years book. Each day, the association works reduce regulatory burdens since Victory in Europe Day. We also relentlessly on behalf of its members, brought our successful General Aviation both large and small, to ensure global UÊÊ`ÛV>ÌiÊvÀÊ«ViÃÊ>`Ê Jobs rallies to two more states: Florida leaders, the public, and the press technologies that enhance and Delaware. And GAMA continued understand the importance and value of general and business aviation to work effectively with policymakers growth, access, and environmental our industry. That’s why I’m honored to and regulators around the globe, sustainability be a GAMA member and its Chairman in with impressive results, including 2016. Here’s to another great year. UÊÊ*ÀÌiÊ}Ài>ÌiÀÊ>Ü>ÀiiÃÃÊvÊ Ài>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊvÊÌ iÊ1°-°Ê Ý«ÀÌ the economic impact and societal Import Bank, permanency of the U.S. Best Regards, benefits of general and business Research & Development tax credit, aviation globally ÕÌÞi>ÀÊ>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊvÀÊ1°-°ÊºLÕÃÊ depreciation,” revision of basic GA UÊÊÃÌiÀÊ}iiÀ>Ê>`ÊLÕÃiÃÃÊ regulations in Europe by the European Aaron Hilkemann aviation renewal through programs Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and GAMA Chairman and and policies that help ensure a EASA’s publication of a single-engine President and CEO, Duncan Aviation robust fleet, pilot, engineering, commercial operating rule. and skilled trades population One of GAMA’s biggest priorities in 2016 UÊÊ-Õ««ÀÌÊÀ}>â>Ì>ÊiÝViiViÊ at GAMA is shaping the passage of a multi-year U.S. Federal Aviation Administration 2015 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2016 Industry Outlook 2015 General Aviation 1 2015 in Review In November, GAMA sent a letter to four and business aviation would have transportation leaders in the U.S. Congress an unquestionably negative impact, about the upcoming U.S. Federal Aviation and safeguards must be in place Administration (FAA) reauthorization bill. to preserve Congressional decision The text of the letter follows. authority in future revenue decisions. UÊÊU ÞÊV >}iÃÊÕÃÌÊ«ÀÛiÊÌ iÊ Dear Chairman Shuster, Chairman efficiency and safety of air travel Thune, Ranking Member DeFazio but also sustain the broader public and Ranking Member Nelson: benefits of aviation, including providing airport access and air traffic service On behalf of the General Aviation for rural and underserved areas and Manufacturers Association (GAMA), I am guaranteeing all users are treated writing today to urge you to introduce equitably in terms of access to airspace. i}Ã>ÌÊvÀÊÌ iÊÀi>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊvÊ Additionally, if a Board is considered, it the FAA in the near term. With the must be composed of individuals who VÕÀÀiÌÊ>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊ >Û}ÊiÝ«Ài`ÊÊ will keep the public interest principles September 30, 2015, there has already of safety, access and rural and small been one extension of FAA programs. community service inviolable while Every day that passes makes it more possessing the expertise to help FAA likely that we will have another, bringing create jobs and bring continued safety advance its operational mission, rather greater uncertainty to the marketplace improvements. GAMA believes that than simply be a collection of aviation and loss of momentum in addressing these reforms could be passed quickly interests. policy areas like certification reform and with bipartisan support. and inconsistent interpretation of FAA UÊÊ7Ì ÊÃÃÕiÃÊiÊÌ iÊÃ>viÊ>`ÊÌiÞÊ regulations. Ê>ÃÊÀiV}âiÃÊÌ >ÌÊV >}iÊ integration of Unmanned Aerial needs to be discussed more broadly, Systems (UAS) and commercial space For GAMA, certification reform and especially in ensuring financial stability ÌÀ>ëÀÌ>ÌÊÌÊÌ iÊ >Ì>Ê regulatory improvements are key and flexibility at the entire agency. As all Airspace System needing to be components of any legislative effort. of us go into this discussion, we need to addressed, great scrutiny must be ÞÊÀi>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊLÊÕÃÌÊ«Õà ÊÌ iÊ be certain that as we try to solve specific given to any proposal that fragments ÊÌÊÀiÊvÕÞÊÕÌâiÊ"À}>â>Ì>Ê problems, we do not create others. the key operational and safety iÃ}>ÌÊÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊ­" ®]Ê FAA’s air traffic system is the largest and oversight elements of FAA. which will help the agency manage most complex in the world; it is also the scarce safety resources more effectively safest and one of the most efficient. To a Because the issues involved in FAA and end unnecessary delays in the degree not found in other countries, the Ài>ÕÌ Àâ>ÌÊÀiµÕÀiÊÌ Õ} ÌvÕÊ certification and regulatory process; economic health and vitality of numerous review, GAMA hopes you will introduce invest in training programs that help businesses and communities, small and legislation in the near term and FAA employees succeed in their large, depend on the nation’s aviation allow constructive and collaborative safety oversight responsibilities; and system. Any change must not weaken discussions to begin on the way ahead. measure the performance of both the this strong foundation, which has made We look forward to working with you and FAA and industry in their respective the U.S. aviation system the envy of the all members of Congress in addressing certification responsibilities. Additionally, world. these issues, and ensuring that we GAMA believes the bill must focus on advance certification reform, aviation FAA’s international engagement and Ê>>Þâ}Ê>`ÊiÛ>Õ>Ì}ÊV >}iÃÊÌÊ manufacturing, and the nation’s aviation leadership, which will help improve the FAA and the overall management of system as a whole. Thank you for your aviation safety and facilitate the flow of the aviation system, GAMA believes the consideration. products globally. following considerations should be a key Sincerely, basis for moving forward: GAMA and our member companies have worked with both the U.S. House UÊÊÞÊV >}iÊÕÃÌÊ i«ÊÃiVÕÀiÊÌ iÊ and U.S. Senate Committees for many future growth and health of the general years to achieve these objectives. With aviation industry given the significant your leadership, the U.S. Congress has number of good jobs it creates. Peter J. Bunce undertaken significant efforts to improve Changing the funding mechanism to President and CEO 2015 General Aviation Statistical Databook & 2016 Industry Outlook 2015 General Aviation certification. Certification reform will help user fees from the fuel tax for general 2 2015 in Review Events Across U.S. Mark GA Week Governors and U.S. members of Congress got a chance to see general aviation firsthand during the second annual General Aviation Maintenance and Manufacturing Week. Manufacturers with facilities at Dallas Love Field in Texas hosted U.S.
Recommended publications
  • In the Early 2000S, the Music Industry Was Shocked When Internet Users Started Sharing Copyrighted Works Through Peer-To-Peer Networks Such As Napster

    In the Early 2000S, the Music Industry Was Shocked When Internet Users Started Sharing Copyrighted Works Through Peer-To-Peer Networks Such As Napster

    In the early 2000s, the music industry was shocked when Internet users started sharing copyrighted works through peer-to-peer networks such as Napster. Software such as Napster made it very easy for people with digital copies of recorded music to share these digital copies with other users. The industry reacted by suing Napster and users of the software that allowed the digital sharing. While the industry’s lawsuits seemed like a reasonable reaction to this epidemic, it should have immediately established an online marketplace for digital music. Eventually, Apple did address the issue by releasing iTunes. Since the introduction of iTunes, the recording industry has seen a rise in profits. Users are willing to pay for digital music as long as the access to it is simple. However, these digital downloads from legal marketplaces are not actually sales; the purchases are actually licenses to the music. This means that a user who purchases a song cannot resale the song in a secondary marketplace because the first sale exception does not apply to licensed material. Courts have given the software and recording industry great power to control their copyrighted work, but it seems ridiculous that a user who purchases a song cannot sell their song when they no longer care to listen to it. The problem for the recording industry lies in the fact that the digital recording of the work is very easy to copy and transfer. If sales in the secondary market were allowed, one could easily make a digital copy then make then resale the original. It is very hard to track whether a copy of the work is still located on a hard drive, cloud, or other storage device.
  • Light Commercial and General Aviation Chair: Gerald S

    Light Commercial and General Aviation Chair: Gerald S

    A1J03: Committee on Light Commercial and General Aviation Chair: Gerald S. McDougall, Southeast Missouri State University Light Commercial and General Aviation Growth Opportunities Will Abound GERALD W. BERNSTEIN, Stanford Transportation Group DAVID S. LAWRENCE, Aviation Market Research The new millennium offers numerous opportunities for light commercial and general aviation. The extent to which this diverse industry can take advantage of these opportunities depends on our ability to: (1) maintain steady, albeit slow, economic growth; (2) undertake research and development of new and enhanced technologies that improve performance and lower costs, (3) forge alliances and approach aircraft production from a total system perspective; and (4) develop and maintain an air traffic system (facilities and control) that is able to efficiently accommodate the expected growth in demand for all categories of air travel. The greatest challenge for the industry is whether government policies and regulations continue to adhere to fiscal and monetary policies that promote economic growth worldwide and provide the necessary investments in our air traffic system to reduce congestion and avoid the distorting influences of user fees or artificial limits to access. HELICOPTER AVIATION Subcommittee A1J03 (1) The helicopter industry can be characterized as technologically mature but unstable in the structure of both its manufacturing and operating sectors. This anomaly is the result of worldwide reductions in military helicopter procurement after years of buildup as well as reduced tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. In addition, and not unrelated to military cutbacks, the trend toward consolidation of military contractors has seriously affected the mostly subsidiary helicopter business.
  • In What Way Is the Rhetoric Used in Youtube Videos Altering the Perception of the LGBTQ+ Community for Both Its Members and Non-Members?

    In What Way Is the Rhetoric Used in Youtube Videos Altering the Perception of the LGBTQ+ Community for Both Its Members and Non-Members?

    In What Way Is the Rhetoric Used in YouTube Videos Altering the Perception of the LGBTQ+ Community for Both Its Members and Non-Members? NATALIE MAURER Produced in Thomas Wright’s Spring 2018 ENC 1102 Introduction The LBGTQ community has become a much more prevalent part of today's society. Over the past several years, the LGBTQ community has been recognized more equally in comparison to other groups in society. June 2015 was a huge turning point for the community due to the legalization of same sex marriage. The legalization of same sex marriage in June 2015 had a great impact on the LBGTQ community, as well as non-members. With an increase in new media platforms like YouTube, content on the LGBTQ community has become more accessible and more prevalent than decades ago. LGBTQ media has been represented in movies, television shows, short videos, and even books. The exposure of LQBTQ characters in a popular 2000s sitcom called Will & Grace paved the way for LGBTQ representation in media. A study conducted by Edward Schiappa and others concluded that exposure to LGBTQ communities through TV helped educate Americans, therefore reducing sexual prejudice. Unfortunately, the way the LBGTQ community is portrayed through online media such as YouTube has an effect on LGBTQ members and non-members, and it has yet to be studied. Most “young people's experiences are affected by the present context characterized by the rapidly increasing prevalence of new (online) media” because of their exposure to several media outlets (McInroy and Craig 32). This gap has led to the research question does the LGBTQ representation on YouTube negatively or positively represent this community to its members, and in what way is the community impacted by this representation as well as non- members? One positive way the LGBTQ community was represented through media was on the popular TV show Will & Grace.
  • Air Transport Industry Analysis Report

    Air Transport Industry Analysis Report

    Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2016 Final Report March 2017 European Commission Annual Analyses related to the EU Air Transport Market 2016 328131 ITD ITA 1 F Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 Final Report March 2015 Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 MarchFinal Report 201 7 European Commission European Commission Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract MOVE/E1/5-2010/SI2.579402. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Mobility and Transport DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG MOVE - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/contact/index_en.htm) Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 W www.mottmac.com Issue and revision record StandardSta Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description ndard A 28.03.17 Various K.
  • The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?

    The Four Health Systems of the United Kingdom: How Do They Compare?

    The four health systems of the United Kingdom: how do they compare? Gwyn Bevan, Marina Karanikolos, Jo Exley, Ellen Nolte, Sheelah Connolly and Nicholas Mays Source report April 2014 About this research This report is the fourth in a series dating back to 1999 which looks at how the publicly financed health care systems in the four countries of the UK have fared before and after devolution. The report was commissioned jointly by The Health Foundation and the Nuffield Trust. The research team was led by Nicholas Mays at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The research looks at how the four national health systems compare and how they have performed in terms of quality and productivity before and after devolution. The research also examines performance in North East England, which is acknowledged to be the region that is most comparable to Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland in terms of socioeconomic and other indicators. This report, along with an accompanying summary report, data appendices, digital outputs and a short report on the history of devolution (to be published later in 2014), are available to download free of charge at www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/compare-uk-health www.health.org.uk/compareUKhealth. Acknowledgements We are grateful: to government statisticians in the four countries for guidance on sources of data, highlighting problems of comparability and for checking the data we have used; for comments on the draft report from anonymous referees and from Vernon Bogdanor, Alec Morton and Laura Schang; and for guidance on national clinical audits from Nick Black and on nursing data from Jim Buchan.
  • Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000S Author(S): Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H

    Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000S Author(S): Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H

    NORC at the University of Chicago The University of Chicago Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s Author(s): Daron Acemoglu, David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson, and Brendan Price Source: Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 34, No. S1 (Part 2, January 2016), pp. S141-S198 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Society of Labor Economists and the NORC at the University of Chicago Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/682384 . Accessed: 18/12/2015 07:23 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, Society of Labor Economists, NORC at the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Labor Economics. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Fri, 18 Dec 2015 07:23:05 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s Daron Acemoglu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and National Bureau of Economic Research David Autor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and National Bureau of Economic Research David Dorn, University of Zurich and Centre for Economic Policy Research Gordon H.
  • Final Report Cessna -152 Aircraft Accident Investigation in Bangladesh

    Final Report Cessna -152 Aircraft Accident Investigation in Bangladesh

    FINAL REPORT CESSNA -152 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IN BANGLADESH FINAL REPORT Aircraft Cessna-152; Training Flight Call Sign S2-ADI Shah Makhdum Airport, Rajshahi, Bangladesh Cessna-152 Aircraft of Flying Academy & General Aviation Ltd. This is to certify that this report has been compiled as per the provisions of ICAO Annex 13 for all concerned. The report has been authenticated and is hereby Approved by the undersigned with a view to ensuring prevention of aircraft accident and that the purpose of this activity is not to apportion blame or liability. Capt Salahuddin M Rahmatullah Head of Aircraft Accident Investigation Group of Bangladesh CAA Headquarters, Kurmitola, Dhaka, Bangladesh E-mail: [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________ AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GROUP OF BANGLADESH (AAIG-BD) 28 MAY 2017 PAGE | 0 FINAL REPORT CESSNA -152 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IN BANGLADESH TABLE OF CONTENTS SL NO TITLE Page No 0 Synopsis 2 1 BODY (FACTUAL INFORMATION) 2 1.1 Introductory Information 2 1.2 Impact Information 3 Protection and Recovery of Wreckage and Disposal of 1.3 4 Diseased/Injured Persons 1.4 Analytical information 4 2 ANALYSIS 7 2.1 General 7 2.2 Flight Operations and others 7 2.3 Cause Analysis 10 3 CONCLUSION 12 3.1 Findings 12 3.1.2 Crew/Pilot 13 3.1.3 Operations 13 3.1.4 Operator 14 3.1.5 Air Traffic Services and Airport Facilities 14 3.1.6 Medical 14 3.2 CAUSES 14 3.2.1 Primary Causes 14 3.2.2 Primary Contributory Causes 15 4 SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 15 _____________________________________________________________________________________ AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GROUP OF BANGLADESH (AAIG-BD) 28 MAY 2017 PAGE | 1 FINAL REPORT CESSNA -152 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION IN BANGLADESH 0.
  • General Aviation Activity and Airport Facilities

    General Aviation Activity and Airport Facilities

    New Hampshire State Airport System Plan Update CHAPTER 2 - AIRPORT SYSTEM INVENTORY 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the existing airport system in New Hampshire as of the end of 2001 and early 2002 and served as the database for the overall System Plan. As such, it was updated throughout the course of the study. This Chapter focuses on the aviation infrastructure that makes up the system of airports in the State, as well as aviation activity, airport facilities, airport financing, airspace and air traffic services, as well as airport access. Chapter 3 discusses the general economic conditions within the regions and municipalities that are served by the airport system. The primary purpose of this data collection and analysis was to provide a comprehensive overview of the aviation system and its key elements. These elements also served as the basis for the subsequent recommendations presented for the airport system. The specific topics covered in this Chapter include: S Data Collection Process S Airport Descriptions S Airport Financing S Airport System Structure S Airspace and Navigational Aids S Capital Improvement Program S Definitions S Scheduled Air Service Summary S Environmental Factors 2.2 DATA COLLECTION PROCESS The data collection was accomplished through a multi-step process that included cataloging existing relevant literature and data, and conducting individual airport surveys and site visits. Division of Aeronautics provided information from their files that included existing airport master plans, FAA Form 5010 Airport Master Records, financial information, and other pertinent data. Two important element of the data collection process included visits to each of the system airports, as well as surveys of airport managers and users.
  • Strategy, Grand Strategy, and the Enduring War on Terror 3

    Strategy, Grand Strategy, and the Enduring War on Terror 3

    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY ON A US STRATEGIC VISION IN A CHANGING WORLD Strategy, Grand Strategy, and the Enduring War on Terror HAL BRANDS Strategy, in national security as in other fields, consists of using the available means to accomplish some important end. Grand strategy requires, among other things, incorporating a nation’s various strategies into a coherent—and solvent—whole. There can be, then, an inherent tension between the demands of successful strategy and those of sustainable grand strategy, for the requirements of maintaining solvency across the range of national programs may limit the amount of resources made available to accomplish some particular objective or meet some pressing threat. This is precisely the challenge the United States faces today in dealing with the problem of jihadist terrorism: the demands of strategy and the demands of grand strategy are Islamism and the International Order International the and Islamism becoming progressively harder to reconcile. The United States has now been fighting a global war on terror (GWOT) for nearly two decades, but the threat posed by extremist groups—particularly those capable of creating geographic safe havens and mounting significant external attacks— remains. The confrontation with al-Qaeda’s “core” after 9/11 led to a struggle against the al-Qaeda “affiliates” in Iraq and elsewhere. That struggle continues, even as the campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (often referred to as ISIS) has taken pride of place in American counterterrorism strategy since 2014. No sooner has the United States suppressed or even defeated one terrorist organization, it often seems, than a new and dangerous successor or group of successors takes its place.
  • GAMA General Aviation Shipment Report 2017

    GAMA General Aviation Shipment Report 2017

    May 8, 2018 General Aviation Aircraft Shipment Report General Aviation Manufacturers Association 1400 K Street NW, Suite 801 | Washington, DC 20005 | USA Rue de la Loi 67 | Brussels 1040 | Belgium 2017 Year End Aircraft Shipments1, 2, 6 by Type Manufactured Worldwide QI QII QIII QIV Year-To-Date Single-Engine Piston 176 224 217 319 936 Multi-Engine Piston 27 41 39 42 149 Total Piston Airplanes 203 265 256 361 1,085 Single-Engine Turboprops 88 116 113 156 473 Multi-Engine Turboprops 14 19 24 33 90 Total Turboprop Airplanes 102 135 137 189 563 Business Jets 130 166 137 244 677 Total Turbine Airplanes 232 301 274 433 1,240 Grand Total Airplane Shipments 435 566 530 794 2,325 Grand Total Airplane Billings $3,711,776,146 $5,318,308,082 $4,091,055,785 $7,079,653,950 $20,200,793,962 Piston Helicopters 58 67 65 74 264 Turbine Helicopters 129 209 133 233 704 Grand Total Helicopter Shipments 187 276 198 307 968 Grand Total Helicopter Billings $569,248,132 $1,307,430,224 $807,121,192 $1,435,910,092 $4,119,709,642 Airplane Shipments1, 2, 6 by Type Manufactured in United States3 Type QI QII QIII QIV Year-To-Date Single-Engine Piston 130 178 168 269 745 Multi-Engine Piston 9 5 12 15 41 Total Piston Airplanes 139 183 180 284 786 Single-Engine Turboprops 67 77 76 103 323 Multi-Engine Turboprops 12 19 24 31 86 Total Turboprop Airplanes 79 96 100 134 409 Business Jets 93 100 97 114 404 Total Turbine Airplanes 172 196 197 248 813 Grand Total 311 379 377 532 1,599 Airplane Shipments1, 2 by Type Manufactured in Europe3 Type QI QII QIII QIV Year-To-Date Single-Engine
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports

    Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports

    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
  • Benefits of a General Aviation Airport* Compiled by Pavlik and Associates

    Benefits of a General Aviation Airport* Compiled by Pavlik and Associates

    Benefits of a General Aviation Airport* compiled by Pavlik and Associates for the City of Ennis July 25, 2016 General Aviation is all civil aviation activity other than that of commercial airlines; including business aviation, law enforcement flying, agricultural application, recreational aviation, air medical services, freight and package delivery, and more. • A General Aviation (GA) Airport is an essential community asset. Key economic benefits include: o Economic Multiplier Effect: Business aircraft travel to and from local airports across the country every day, bringing marketing, professional, technical service and support staffers efficiently and quickly to their destination. These individuals, in turn, spend money in the local economy by staying in local hotels and eating at nearby restaurants, creating the economic “multiplier effect” in the area. o Competitive Advantage: Airports help keep existing employers in a community and attract new ones to a region because companies value the transportation and competitive business advantages offered by GA airports. Business developers look for ready access to air transportation when they make decisions on where to locate new operations and facilities. o Essential Access: The ability to move people and goods quickly to and from airports has tangible benefits for everyone, not just air travelers. Overnight mail and package delivery, the transport of fresh fruits, vegetables, flowers and more to locations that would not otherwise have that access, all would not be possible without an airport nearby. • A GA airport allows a city to offer and enjoy expanded services that raise the quality of life in the area, including: o Lifesaving Services: Emergency medical services and air ambulance operators provide critically ill or injured people with timely access to specialized medical treatment through airlift operations, organ transports and more.