DOCSLIB.ORG

Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case Discussion Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case Discussion Paper EarthCheck Consulting, for Bass Coast Shire Council and Mornington Peninsula Shire Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case Discussion Paper November 2017 EarthCheck Consulting, for Bass Coast Shire Council and Mornington Peninsula Shire Executive Summary The concept of a vehicle and passenger ferry linking the o An estimated 166,179 additional passengers in Mornington Peninsula with Phillip Island has been the 2025 plus the 60,000 existing passenger ferry users. subject of frequent discussion since preliminary feasibility studies were undertaken in the mid-1990s. The forecast additional passengers will likely be a mix of Additional Day and Overnight Visitors (66.8%) and a Regional Development Victoria, Bass Coast Shire smaller percentage of New Touring Visitors (33.2%) Council and the Mornington Peninsula Shire have spending up to an additional $18.85M per annum. commissioned this independent review of the feasibility of a vehicle ferry to access the Business Case in light of With input from the community and from case studies a a number of contributing factors: number of key issues have been identified that must be addressed in the Draft Business Case. o Increasing visitor numbers to the region; o The opportunity to create a world-famous While the overall industry and community response has touring route; been positive, further community engagement is o Pressures on emergency response and crisis needed to ensure a full response. The general concept events, particularly on Phillip Island; of a car ferry has 84% support from online survey o The potential for increased employment and respondents, and 62.5% of visitors indicating that they education opportunities; and would use a vehicle ferry, its location and the impacts o The potential for a vehicle ferry to be a vital of development and operation are yet to be defined link in the public transport network. and must be rigorously assessed in the Draft Business Case. The key issues identified, include: This Discussion Paper summarises the findings to date from the first round of industry and community o Environmental impacts of the development consultation and invites input to the Draft Business and operation of the ferry (marine strike, Case. The Paper also summarises the currently available coastal erosion, the need for dredging, impacts information on the demand model and economic on sensitive marine and terrestrial ecosystems impact studies for input. This Discussion Paper aims to including noise and light); summarise the key inputs to the Draft Business Case o Social impacts (traffic, congestion, emergency seeking industry and community input on the findings evacuation, visual amenity, and impacts on the to guide the Draft Business Case (to be released early in adjacent residents and land owners from the 2018). final agreed terminal locations; and o Economic impacts both positive (job creation, The Draft Business Case will be based on three improved access to employment and operating options: education, and visitor expenditure) as well as negative effects (cost of the project, including 1) Status Quo (no car ferry, passenger ferry as consultant reports and possible ongoing costs current); to the community). 2) Car & Passenger Ferry to Stony Point, Cowes and Tankerton (French Island); and A variety of potential sites have been examined at 3) Car & Passenger Ferry (Stony Point to Cowes) Cowes and Stony Point and options considered for and Passenger Ferry only to Tankerton. Tankerton (French Island). Due to the complexities of each site, further technical work is required to ensure The Draft Business Case assessment of traffic, that the final site selected is ecologically sound, socially environmental, social and economic impacts will be acceptable, and operationally feasible. based on the demand model assumptions of: o 36 car vehicle ferry with capacity for 300 Inputs to the Draft Business Case, based on passengers. o 10 sailings per day, 365 days per year. information provided in this document, are o Annual ferry capacity of 131,400 vehicles, operating encouraged and should be emailed to at 39.9% of capacity (52,468 vehicles) in 2025. [email protected]. Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case | Discussion Paper 2 EarthCheck Consulting, for Bass Coast Shire Council and Mornington Peninsula Shire Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 2 SETTING THE SCENE ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 Background ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1. Review of Previous Reports .................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Other Reports ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Victorian Government ............................................................................................................ 8 1.4. Mornington Peninsula Shire ................................................................................................... 8 1.5. Bass Coast Shire Council ......................................................................................................... 8 1.6. Regional Tourism Organisations ............................................................................................. 8 1.7. Implications for the Business Case ......................................................................................... 8 2.0 Stage One Consultation ............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Consultation Process Overview .............................................................................................. 9 2.2 Summary of Consultation to Date ........................................................................................10 2.3 Resident Survey Results ........................................................................................................12 2.4 Bass Coast Shire ....................................................................................................................12 2.5 Mornington Peninsula Shire .................................................................................................13 2.6 French Island .........................................................................................................................13 2.7 Support from Industry ..........................................................................................................15 2.8 Social Media..........................................................................................................................16 2.9 Direct feedback via phone, post or email .............................................................................16 2.10 Tally Sheet Survey .................................................................................................................16 2.11 Implications for the Business Case .......................................................................................16 DEMAND MODEL ............................................................................................................................. 17 3.0 Passenger Ferry Demand Model ................................................................................................ 18 3.1 The Current Passenger Ferry ................................................................................................18 3.2 Walk-on Passenger Demand .................................................................................................18 3.3 Implications for the Draft Business Case ..............................................................................18 3.4 Vehicle Ferry Demand Model ...............................................................................................19 3.5 Preliminary Economic Impact Analysis - Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry ......................22 TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................................................................ 28 4.0 Technical Investigations .............................................................................................................. 29 4.1 Creating an Iconic Touring Route .........................................................................................29 4.2 Case Studies ..........................................................................................................................30 4.2.1 In Depth Case Study 1 – Sealink Ferries Auckland, New Zealand .........................................30 4.2.2 In Depth Case Study 2 – Searoad Ferries Queenscliff to Sorrento, Victoria, Australia .........35 4.2.3 Kettering - Bruny Bay Ferry Service, Tasmania .....................................................................37 4.2.4 Coastal Circle Route, British Columbia .................................................................................37 Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case | Discussion Paper 3 EarthCheck Consulting, for Bass Coast Shire Council and Mornington Peninsula Shire 4.2.5 Helgelandskysten, Norway ...................................................................................................37 4.2.6 The Wild Atlantic Way,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seacare Authority Exemption
    EXEMPTION 1—SCHEDULE 1 Official IMO Year of Ship Name Length Type Number Number Completion 1 GIANT LEAP 861091 13.30 2013 Yacht 1209 856291 35.11 1996 Barge 2 DREAM 860926 11.97 2007 Catamaran 2 ITCHY FEET 862427 12.58 2019 Catamaran 2 LITTLE MISSES 862893 11.55 2000 857725 30.75 1988 Passenger vessel 2001 852712 8702783 30.45 1986 Ferry 2ABREAST 859329 10.00 1990 Catamaran Pleasure Yacht 2GETHER II 859399 13.10 2008 Catamaran Pleasure Yacht 2-KAN 853537 16.10 1989 Launch 2ND HOME 856480 10.90 1996 Launch 2XS 859949 14.25 2002 Catamaran 34 SOUTH 857212 24.33 2002 Fishing 35 TONNER 861075 9714135 32.50 2014 Barge 38 SOUTH 861432 11.55 1999 Catamaran 55 NORD 860974 14.24 1990 Pleasure craft 79 199188 9.54 1935 Yacht 82 YACHT 860131 26.00 2004 Motor Yacht 83 862656 52.50 1999 Work Boat 84 862655 52.50 2000 Work Boat A BIT OF ATTITUDE 859982 16.20 2010 Yacht A COCONUT 862582 13.10 1988 Yacht A L ROBB 859526 23.95 2010 Ferry A MORNING SONG 862292 13.09 2003 Pleasure craft A P RECOVERY 857439 51.50 1977 Crane/derrick barge A QUOLL 856542 11.00 1998 Yacht A ROOM WITH A VIEW 855032 16.02 1994 Pleasure A SOJOURN 861968 15.32 2008 Pleasure craft A VOS SANTE 858856 13.00 2003 Catamaran Pleasure Yacht A Y BALAMARA 343939 9.91 1969 Yacht A.L.S.T. JAMAEKA PEARL 854831 15.24 1972 Yacht A.M.S. 1808 862294 54.86 2018 Barge A.M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Casualty Week Feb 4
    Lloyd’s Casualty Week contains information from worldwide sources of Marine, Non-Marine and Aviation casualties together with other reports Lloyd's relevant to the shipping, transport and insurance communities CasualtyWeek February 4 2005 Southeast Asia hijackings spark ‘phantom tugs’ fears IRACY watchdog the certainly controlled by organised crime home and none of their families has heard International Maritime Bureau gangs,” the CCS said. from them since the tug was hijacked,” CCS Pwarns that a fleet of phantom tugs An Indonesian tug, Christian, and a said. may be plying southeast Asian waters barge it was towing, hijacked on December The crew, who were long-standing after a spate of hijackings. 14 last year, were found in a Malaysian employees, were not believed to be involved “The number of tugs and tows being shipyard with the tug’s name and port of in the hijacking and the pirates found on stolen in southeast Asia has prompted fears registry changed. The yard had been paid in board the vessel claim none of the crew was that a new trade in phantom tugs may be advance for the work, which was done with on board when they joined the vessel. emerging and preparing to operate in much care to wipe out traces of the previous IMB director Potengal Mukundan said the way that phantom ships did,” said names. the fact the crew were still missing was the Commercial Crime Services, part of the “This suggests the tug was being matter of greatest concern. International Chamber of Commerce. prepared to re-enter the market as a “The spate of attacks on tugs and the The number of tugs and barges hijacked phantom,” CCS said.
    [Show full text]
  • MANLY FERRIES BALGOWLAH, BARRENJOEY and BARAGOOLA
    MANLY FERRIES BALGOWLAH, BARRENJOEY and BARAGOOLA Tony Prescott and Ross Willson This article originally appeared in The Log, vol. 12, no. 3 New Series (25 August 1979), pp. 78-85 It has been edited for digital publication on 27 December 2007. © The authors 2007. Drawings © Peter Nicolson 1970. Baragoola in the 1980s, in her final years as a government-operated ferry. (Tony Prescott) INTRODUCTION The popular image of the Manly ferry during the present century has very much evolved around the "class" (to use a naval term loosely) of six very similar double-ended screw steamers built for the Port Jackson Co-operative Steamship Co. Ltd. and the Port Jackson and Manly Steamship Co. Ltd. between 1905 and 1922. These six steamers were to be eclipsed in size, speed, accommodation and glamour by the Scottish-built Dee Why and Curl Curl of 1928 (The Log, May 1977) and South Steyne of 1938 (The Log, August 1983, November 1983). However, the smaller boats were to prove more economically practical in the long-term and two of them, both to be described in this article, are still in service while the Scottish boats have been withdrawn. Up to the early years of this century, the Port Jackson company operated a fleet consisting almost entirely of paddle steamers. The reason for the relatively late transition to screw propulsion lay in the necessity of using double-ended ships due to the configuration of Sydney Harbour with its many coves and the difficulties of turning in the Circular Quay terminus. Smaller double-ended ferries had been found to operate quite successfully with screw propulsion, but the Manly service had speed and heavy weather requirements which necessitated fine bows on the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Searoad Ferries – Sorrento Terminal Upgrade Coastal Assessment
    Searoad Ferries – Sorrento Terminal Upgrade Coastal Assessment Peninsula Searoad Transport Pty Ltd August 2016 Document Status Version Doc type Reviewed by Approved by Date issued V01 Draft EAL EAL 01/08/2016 V02 Final Draft EAL EAL 15/08/2016 V03 Final Report EAL EAL 23/08/2016 Project Details Project Name Searoad Ferries – Sorrento Terminal Upgrade Coastal Assessment Client Peninsula Searoad Transport Pty Ltd Client Project Manager Matt McDonald Water Technology Project Manager Elise Lawry Water Technology Project Director Christine Lauchlan Arrowsmith Authors TDG, PXV Document Number 4430-01_R01V03 COPYRIGHT Water Technology Pty Ltd has produced this document in accordance with instructions from Peninsula Searoad Transport Pty Ltd for their use only. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Water Technology Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without written permission of Water Technology Pty Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. Water Technology Pty Ltd does not warrant this document is definitive nor free from error and does not accept liability for any loss caused, or arising from, reliance upon the information provided herein. 15 Business Park Drive Notting Hill VIC 3168 Telephone (03) 8526 0800 Fax (03) 9558 9365 ACN 093 377 283 ABN 60 093 377 283 01_R01v03 - 4430 Peninsula Searoad Transport Pty Ltd | August 2016 Searoad Ferries – Sorrento Terminal Upgrade Coastal Assessment Page 2 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Proposed Development 6 1.2 Scope of Works 8 2 COASTAL
    [Show full text]
  • Our Maritime Australia 2018
    OUR MARITIME AUSTRALIA 2018 t is a great pleasure to present to you this compendium which profiles Australian Imaritime owners and operators – including the Government vessels. We encourage you to use this as a reference tool that demonstrates the capacity and vitality of our marine industry. Maritime Industry Australia Ltd (MIAL) has been operating in various forms since 1899 and is uniquely positioned to provide dedicated maritime expertise and advice. MIAL is driven to promote a sustainable, vibrant and competitive Australian maritime industry and to expand the Australian maritime cluster. This is an extraordinary time in our industry; a time when we need our nation’s leaders to be more aware than ever of the commitment of industry to new opportunities; a time when we have an even greater role in building stronger relationships between our industry and our elected representatives. MIAL’s Our Maritime Nation 2018 is just the beginning. Noel G Hart Chairman Teresa Lloyd Chief Executive Officer Cover photo courtesy of Captain Mike Watson, Master R/V INVESTIGATOR ABS Class Society Ardent Oceania Australian Maritime College Brisbane Marine Pilots Colin Biggers & Paisley DNVGL Engage Marine ERGT Australia AMC Search ANL Container Line ASP Ship Management BP Shipping Pty Ltd Carnival Australia Pty Ltd AUSTRALIA ES Link Services Ferriby Marine Australia GRD-Franmarine Holdings Greencap CSL Australia Pty Ltd DOF Maersk Supply Service MMA Offshore Limited North West Shelf Shipping Service Company Standard ™ Hempel (Australia) Pty Ltd Holman Fenwick
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case
    Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Cowes to Stony Point Vehicle Ferry Business Case Will there be a 200m “exclusion zone” around the proposed Cowes vehicle ferry terminal and jetty? A 200 metre exclusion zone on either side of a jetty is not common practice in Victoria. An exclusion zone is typically used for vessel safety (including all craft such as jet skis). If one is applied it is often, but not always, applied to the area of the jetty where the vessel docks for safety reasons, depending on the needs of the vessels using it. Similarly, an exclusion zone is typically only applied to the berth (i.e. at the end of the jetty to the seaward side) not the remainder of the jetty or the beach. It is too soon to determine whether an exclusion zone will be needed for the berth, this would be decided in the approvals process and in consultation with the proponent ferry operator, if the project proceeds. Will pedestrians be able to walk along the beach under the Cowes terminal design being that is being considered? The project team is conscious of the importance of the beach as both a community and tourism asset and has aimed to provide project options that minimise shoreline impact. For this reason, the current design being considered for Cowes does have capacity for pedestrian access underneath the jetty along the beach, however this will be looked at in more detail should the project proceed to the detailed design phase. Detailed Design as well as all future steps will mean that the community has an additional opportunity to have direct input.
    [Show full text]
  • MORNINGTON PENINSULA SHIRE HERITAGE REVIEW, AREA 1 Volume 1 - Thematic History
    Council Meeting - Item 2.13 Attachment 1 Monday, 13 August, 2012 MORNINGTON PENINSULA SHIRE HERITAGE REVIEW, AREA 1 Volume 1 - Thematic History Final report 30 July 2012 Prepared for Mornington Peninsula Shire Council Meeting - Item 2.13 Attachment 1 Monday, 13 August, 2012 MORNINGTON PENINSULA SHIRE THEMATIC HISTORY July 2012 Prepared for Mornington Peninsula Shire Graeme Butler & Associates Edited by Context Pty Ltd Council Meeting - Item 2.13 Attachment 1 Monday, 13 August, 2012 MORNINGTON PENINSULA SHIRE The original report is authored by Graeme Butler & Associates, 2008. This version has been edited by Context Pty Ltd 2012. 2012 Project team: Dr Aron Paul, Editing Project Manager, Context Nicholas Turner, Editing consultant David Helms, Senior Consultant, Context Jessie Briggs, Consultant, Context Report Register This report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Mornington Peninsula Shire Thematic History undertaken by Context Pty Ltd in accordance with our internal quality management system. Project No. Issue No. Notes/description Issue date 1496 1 Draft Edited History 11/7/2011 1496 2 Edited History 29/6/2012 1496 3 Final Edited History 30/7/2012 Context Pty Ltd 22 Merri Street, Brunswick 3056 Phone 03 9380 6933 Facsimile 03 9380 4066 Email [email protected] Web www.contextpl.com.au ii Council Meeting - Item 2.13 Attachment 1 Monday, 13 August, 2012 THEMATIC HISTORY CONTENTS CONTENTS III LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS VII INTRODUCTION 1 The purpose and scope of this history 1 Australian Historic Themes
    [Show full text]
  • Wonthaggi Courts Ready for Action!
    Coastell Winter 2017 Wonthaggi courts ready for action! Wonthaggi has seven brand new netball courts after The re-designed fencing provides an open feel to the the six month redevelopment project was completed facility and will encourage passive use outside of formal earlier this year. Officially opened by Member for Eastern training and game time. This too will improve access and Victoria, Harriet Shing MP in April, the brightly coloured provide opportunities for netball enthusiasts. courts are now a showcase sporting facility for Bass Mayor, Cr Pamela Rothfield, commented on the Coast, and will provide wonderful opportunities for all significance of this project in representing Council’s budding netballers across the Shire. commitment to recreation in Bass Coast. Captured as a key project within the Sport and Active “We are excited to now see the wonderful opportunities Recreation Needs Assessment Study, the courts were this major investment in sport presents local netball,” Cr funded through contributions from Council ($599,000), Rothfield said. Sport and Recreation Victoria ($100,000), Wonthaggi and “A big thank you to the Wonthaggi and District Netball District Netball Association ($100,000) and the Wonthaggi Association and the Wonthaggi Power Netball Club for Power Football Netball Club ($20,000). The total cost of their tireless work in fundraising and volunteering through the project was $819,000. the delivery of this project, and, the continued support The colourful plexipave surface provides all weather and for netball through their competitions and programs. compliant playing areas, meaning the courts can now We’re very excited to see these new courts put to great host top quality regular season games, tournaments and use!” finals matches.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Environment Act 1987 BASS COAST PLANNING
    Planning and Environment Act 1987 BASS COAST PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C113 EXPLANATORY REPORT Who is the planning authority? This amendment has been prepared by the Minister for Planning, who is the planning authority for this amendment. The amendment has been made at the request of the Bass Coast Shire Council. Land affected by the amendment. The amendment applies to: The townships of Wonthaggi and Dalyston and the surrounding farming land and specifically, the following properties: o Lot 1 TP402901 being 90 Fuller Road, Wonthaggi o Lots 2 & 3 PS302494 being Helsop Road, North Wonthaggi o Lot 1 PS302494 being 60 Oates Road and Lots 1 & 2 LP211687 being 26-30 Oates Road, North Wonthaggi o Lot 1 TP129892 being 3028 Korumburra-Wonthaggi Road, North Wonthaggi o Lot 2 PS525119 being Benetti Road, Wonthaggi What the amendment does. The amendment gives effect to the Wonthaggi Dalyston Structure Plan by incorporating the strategic planning objectives of the Wonthaggi Dalyston Structure Plan into the Bass Coast Planning Scheme. The amendment also introduces relevant zones and overlays to manage the integrated and sustainable development of the Wonthaggi north east growth area in accordance with the Structure Plan. Specifically, the amendment makes the following changes to the Bass Coast Planning Scheme: Includes the “Wonthaggi Dalyston Structure Plan, September 2008” in Clause 21.12 as a Reference Document. Includes the “Wonthaggi north east growth area Development Plan: Final, November 2009” in Clause 21.12 as a Reference Document. Amends Clauses 21.01, 21.02, 21.04 and 21.06 of the Municipal Strategic Statement to incorporate the strategic planning objectives of the Wonthaggi Dalyston Structure Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Bass Coast Walks and Trails
    Contact Details Bass Coast Visitor Information Centres Walks and Trails Our Visitor Information Centres are able to provide you with information, book accommodation, tickets and tours, and assist you with planning your holiday throughout Bass Coast. Cowes Visitor Information Centre 91-97 Thompson Avenue Cowes VIC 3922 1300 366 422 Inverloch Visitor Information Centre 16 A’Beckett Street Inverloch VIC 3996 1300 762 433 Phillip Island Visitor Information Centre 895 Phillip Island Road Newhaven VIC 3925 1300 366 422 Wonthaggi Visitor Information Centre 1 Bent Street Wonthaggi VIC 3995 National Relay Service For people with communication difficulties 13 36 77 Website For more information visit us online: www.visitbasscoast.com.au Thanks to all those who assisted with checking walks information including Bass Coast Shire Council staff and volunteers, Parks Victoria, Phillip Island Nature Parks and Friends of Wonthaggi Heathland & Coastal Reserve. Main cover image by Phoebe Honey. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this brochure, Bass Coast Shire Council does not accept any responsibility for inaccuracies, omissions, incorrect information or any action taken as a result of any information detailed. Information supplied is correct as at 1/9/2016. Melbourne C431 Melbourne M420 Walks and Trails 1 hr 30 mins C432 A440 Bass Coast Cape Paterson C434 1 Bass Coast Rail Trail 2 Cape Paterson Foreshore Walk Bass Grantville & Surrounds A420 Coast 3 Grantville Foreshore Walk 4 Corinella Foreshore
    [Show full text]
  • Bass Coast Shire, Mainland the Gurdies Nature Reserve
    Bass Coast Shire, Mainland The Gurdies Nature Reserve to Melbourne S Cardinia 1 O U 1 T Shire GURD H Pioneer IES - ST This reserve protects one of the few significant Western Bay H E Port L I E Y Quarry R RD remnants of coastal woodland on Western Port. W H B Jam Jerrup A S S The Gurdies There is a small wayside stop opposite Pioneer Bay on S A S B Nature GIP Conservation the Bass Highway. Another access point is via PSL AND Reserve Dunbabbin Road, off Stuart’s Road. There is a good French Island H W Grantville D UN parking area with magnificent views over Western Port. BA Y B B H R I RD W D N Near the top of the main trail a side track to the north Y R IE G The L U E 2 leads to a gully where Bassian Thrush, Rufous Fantail and H D R ST. R Pier D Gurdies Boat Ramp I E S- er Eastern Whipbirds can be found. S Pioneer Bay T v S . H - i M A R Western Port E R Y 1 L O T I Y H E R N Woodleigh E D RD U N B W A T O R B R O Other birds seen in The Gurdies Nature D B A D . Grantville IN LEIGH-ST HELIER R W D Western Port E D GU Tenby T R ST Y RD GR S Kernot Reserve include parrots, thornbills, robins, AN T T 2 Point V FF S Y IL O T N L N W E O GUY - U treecreepers, sittellas and honeyeaters.
    [Show full text]
  • October for Web.Cdr
    THE QUEENSCLIFFE HERALD IS AVAILABLE ONLINE NOW AT www.queenscliffeherald.com.au Make your vote count Who sits on council affects us all. Councillors ratepayers many thousands of dollars; projects mould the community in which we live through awaiting the go ahead leapfrogged by others planning decisions, providing assistance for aged deemed less urgent. and early child care services, maintaining parks, Cr Merriman is seeking re-election. As mayor for libraries, infrastructure and the like. four years and chair of council, he must accept Local councils are the second highest subject of some responsibility for allowing these conflicts to complaints to the Ombudsman's office with over fester and while his style was to appease, this has 3,000 a year including bullying, conflicts of not been seen as strong leadership by many. Other interest, assault and thirteen incidents of residents, and Cr Merriman, believe that council misconduct. achievements have been satisfactory. With Crs Burgess, Mitchell and Davies retiring As a voter you need to ascertain if candidates will it is an opportune time to evaluate council's serve the best interests of the whole community and performance over the past four years. Resident's how they will achieve this. Ask yourself and them - opinions vary about how well councillors carried Have they been visible in the community? Do they out their duties and responsibilities but many say have experience in business, community leadership the division on council was at the forefront along or making hard decisions that will enhance their with planning issues, disruption to the democratic role as a councillor? Are they fair-minded? Will they council processes and legal costs with VCAT.
    [Show full text]