Arxiv:Astro-Ph/0606633V2 4 Jul 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 A CURIOUS NEW MILKY WAY SATELLITE IN URSA MAJOR0 D. B. Zucker1, V.Belokurov1, N.W.Evans1, J. T. Kleyna2, M. J. Irwin1,M.I.Wilkinson1,M.Fellhauer1,D.M.Bramich1,G.Gilmore1, H. J. Newberg3,B.Yanny4,J.A.Smith5,6,P.C.Hewett1,E.F.Bell7, H.-W. Rix7, O.Y. Gnedin8,S.Vidrih1,R.F.G.Wyse9,B.Willman10, E. K. Grebel11,D.P.Schneider12,T.C.Beers13,A. Y.Kniazev7,14 J.C. Barentine15,H.Brewington15,J.Brinkmann15,M.Harvanek15, S.J. Kleinman16,J.Krzesinski15,17,D.Long15,A.Nitta18,S.A.Snedden15 submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters ABSTRACT In this Letter, we study a localized stellar overdensity in the constellation of Ursa Major, first identified in Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data and subsequently followed up with Subaru imaging. Its color-magnitude diagram (CMD) shows a well-defined sub-giant branch, main sequence and turn-off, from which we estimate a distance of ∼ 30 kpc and a projected size of ∼ 250 × 125 pc. The CMD suggests a composite population with some range in metallicity and/or age. Based on its extent and stellar population, we argue that this is a previously unknown satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, hereby named Ursa Major II (UMa II) after its constellation. Using SDSS data, we find an absolute magnitude of MV ∼ −3.8, which would make it the faintest known satellite galaxy. UMa II’s isophotes are irregular and distorted with evidence for multiple concentrations; this suggests that the satellite is in the process of disruption. Subject headings: galaxies: dwarf — galaxies: individual (Ursa Major II) — Local Group 1. INTRODUCTION TABLE 1 Numerical simulations in the hierarchical cold dark matter Properties of the Ursa Major II Dwarf paradigm of galaxy formation generally predict 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more satellite halos in the present day Local Parametera Group than the number of dwarf galaxies thus far observed Coordinates (J2000) 08:51:30 +63:07:48 (e.g., Mooreet al. 1999; Klypinet al. 1999; Benson et al. Coordinates (Galactic) ℓ = 152.5◦, b = 37.4◦ 2002). Numerous solutions have been proposed for this Position Angle 95◦ Ellipticity 0.5 “missing satellite” problem. For example, star formation may m Central Extinction, AV 0. 29 be inhibited in low-mass systems (e.g., Bullock et al. 2001; m m Vtot 14. 3 ± 0. 5 m m Somerville 2002), or the known satellites may represent a (m−M)0 17. 5 ± 0. 3 m m higher mass regime of the satellite initial mass function (e.g., Mtot,V −3. 8 ± 0. 6 aIntegrated magnitudes are corrected for the 1 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Galactic foreground reddening reported by Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK;zucker,vasily,[email protected] Schlegel et al. (1998) 2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 3 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 4 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 Stoehr et al. 2002; Kravtsov et al. 2004). 5 Los Alamos National Laboratory, ISR-4, MS D448, Los Alamos, NM However, it has become increasingly clear over the last 87545 arXiv:astro-ph/0606633v2 4 Jul 2006 two years that the census of Local Group satellites is 6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Austin Peay State University, P.O. Box 4608, Clarksville, TN 37040 seriously incomplete. Data from the Sloan Digital Sky 7 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) have revealed five new Germany nearby dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) in quick succession: An- 8 Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, dromeda IX (Zucker et al. 2004), Ursa Major (Willman et al. Columbus, OH 43210 2005a), Andromeda X (Zuckeret al. 2006b), Canes Ve- 9 The Johns Hopkins University, 3701 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 natici (Zucker et al. 2006a) and Bo¨otes (Belokurovet al. 10 Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, 2006b). All five galaxies were detected as stellar over- New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003 densities. The purpose of this Letter is to study an- 11 Astronomical Institute of the University of Basel, Department of other prominent stellar overdensity in SDSS Data Release 4 Physics and Astronomy, Venusstrasse 7, CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland 12 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State Uni- (Adelman-McCarthy et al. 2006). Grillmair (2006) indepen- versity, 525 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802 dently called attention to it, stating that it may be a “new 13 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East globular cluster or dwarf spheroidal”. Here we provide evi- Lansing, MI 48824 dence from SDSS and subsequent deeper Subaru imaging for 14 South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, its interpretation as a dwarf spheroidal galaxy, the thirteenth Cape Town, South Africa around the Milky Way, with the proposed name Ursa Major II 15 Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349 16 Subaru Telescope, 650 N. A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720 (UMa II). 17 Mt. Suhora Observatory, Cracow Pedagogical University, ul. Pod- chorazych 2, 30-084 Cracow, Poland 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS 18 Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720 The SDSS is an imaging and spectroscopic survey, 0 Based in part on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated with imaging data taken in five photometric bands (u, g, by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. r, i and z; Fukugitaet al. 1996; Gunn etal. 1998, 2006; 2 Zucker et al. 16 18 0.4 17 19 0.2 18 20 21 i 0.0 i 19 ∆δ 20 22 −0.2 21 23 −0.4 22 24 16 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.4 17 g − i g − i 0.2 18 0.4 Subaru SDSS 0.0 i 19 ∆δ 20 0.2 −0.2 21 0.0 −0.4 ∆δ 22 −0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 16 −0.4 0.4 17 0.2 18 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 ∆α ∆α 0.0 i 19 ∆δ ig 20 F . 2.— The UMa II Dwarf as seen by Subaru: Upper left: CMD of the −0.2 central region of UMa II (see dashed box in the upper right panel of Figure 1), 21 −0.4 constructed with Subaru g, i data. The solid gray line graphically indicates the 22 color-magnitude selection criteria used to construct the contour plots in the 0.4 0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 lower panels. The error bars on the left show the typical photometric errors ∆α g − i at the i−band magnitude indicated. Upper right: A color-magnitude den- sity plot (Hess diagram), showing the CMD of the box minus a control-field Fig. 1.— The UMa II Dwarf as seen by SDSS: Upper left: Combined SDSS CMD, normalized to the number of stars in each CMD. Lower left: Isoden- g, r, i images of a 1.2◦×1.2◦ field centered on the overdensity (J2000 08:51:30 sity contours of the stars selected from the Subaru data by the gray box in the +63:07:48). ∆α and ∆δ are the relative offsets in right ascension and declina- upper left panel. The plotted contour levels are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9σ above the tion, measured in degrees of arc. The dashed lines indicate the two pointings background level. ∆α and ∆δ are measured in degrees of arc. Lower right: observed with Subaru (see §2). Middle left: The spatial distribution of all blue Isodensity contours using SDSS data for comparison, with levels of 2, 3, 5, objects (g − i < 0.5) classified as stars in the same area. Lower left: Binned 7 and 9σ above the background plotted. Note that the three blobs appear in spatial density of all blue stellar objects, together with a dotted box that cov- both panels. ers most of the object and a dotted annulus used to define the background. Upper right: CMD of all stellar objects within the dotted box; note the clear overdensity (upper left panel of Figure 1). Each pointing was main sequence turn-off and subgiant branch, along with hints of horizontal observed in g′ and i′ bands (for ease of calibration with SDSS and red giant branches, even without removal of field contamination. Middle data) in a 3-exposure dither to cover the gaps between CCDs. right: Control CMD of field stars from the dotted annulus. Lower right: A color-magnitude density plot (Hess diagram), showing the CMD of the box Each exposure was 240s, for 12 minutes of exposure time minus the control CMD, normalized to the number of stars in each CMD. in each band. Unfortunately, several exposures of the west- All photometric data were corrected for Galactic foreground extinction using ern pointing were affected by problems with vignetting and Schlegel et al. (1998). tracking, so that only single g′ and i′ exposures of this area Hogg et al. 2001; Adelman-McCarthyet al. 2006) and au- were usable. The data were processed using a general pur- tomatically processed through photometric and astromet- pose pipeline modified for Subaru reductions. Images were ric pipelines (Lupton, Gunn, & Szalay 1999; Stoughton et al.