MARKET WATCH Weekly Market Data Analysis
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
No Ordinary Place. No Ordinary Festival
Queenstown, Tasmania | 14–16 October 2016 | theunconformity.com.au No ordinary place. No ordinary festival. 1 WELCOME TO QUEENSTOWN and Tasmania’s West IN 2016, The Unconformity will once again Coast for The Unconformity. This festival is really like no bring an exciting program of contemporary arts other, one that must be experienced to be believed. experiences to Queenstown and surrounds. These arts experiences are as varied and An unconformity is an area of rock that shows a geological unique as the voices they represent with works break in time. The Unconformity Festival bridges every by local, national and international artists. layer of the West Coast and, like its geological namesake, indicates a break in the region’s past and present. It brings The value the Festival brings to the Queenstown the community together to celebrate Queenstown’s rugged community is significant. It encourages backbone, unique arts culture and unmatched sense of place. community members to come together and participate in the arts and the calibre of its This year’s festival program showcases local, interstate program attracts more visitors to the region and overseas artists to present a weekend for everyone each biennial year. The Unconformity compels to enjoy. It is as dramatic as the surrounding landscape. visitors to engage with and explore the unique The Tasmanian Government is proud to support The region that is Tasmania’s remote West Coast, Unconformity in 2016. Congratulations to the team behind drawing them back again and again. the festival who, along with the Queenstown community, Over the past six years, the festival bring this extraordinary mix of arts and heritage together has flourished and grown and is now a for all of us to embrace. -
Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000
Certificate of Registration ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - ISO 14001:2015 This is to certify that: Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000 Holds Certificate Number: EMS 603522 and operates an Environmental Management System which complies with the requirements of ISO 14001:2015 for the following scope: Operation, maintenance and management of electricity generation facilities including power stations (hydroelectric, solar, diesel and wind), distribution network, associated lakes and waterways. For and on behalf of BSI: Chris Cheung, Head of Compliance & Risk - Asia Pacific Original Registration Date: 1998-05-15 Effective Date: 2018-11-12 Latest Revision Date: 2018-11-16 Expiry Date: 2021-11-28 Page: 1 of 3 This certificate was issued electronically and remains the property of BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211 and is bound by the conditions of contract. This certificate can be verified at www.bsi-global.com/clientdirectory. Printed copies can be validated at www.bsi-global.com/ClientDirectory. Further clarifications regarding the scope of this certificate and the applicability of ISO 14001:2015 requirements may be obtained by consulting the organization. This certificate is valid only if provided original copies are in complete set. Information and Contact: BSI, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP. Tel: + 44 345 080 9000 BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK. Information and Contact: BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211: Suite 2, Level 7, 15 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113 A Member of the BSI Group of Companies. -
Derwent Catchment Review
Derwent Catchment Review PART 1 Introduction and Background Prepared for Derwent Catchment Review Steering Committee June, 2011 By Ruth Eriksen, Lois Koehnken, Alistair Brooks and Daniel Ray Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Scope and Need....................................................................................................1 2 Physical setting......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Catchment description......................................................................................................2 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology ...........................................................................................5 2.3 Rainfall and climate...........................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Current climate ............................................................................................................9 2.3.2 Future climate............................................................................................................10 2.4 Vegetation patterns ........................................................................................................12 2.5 River hydrology ...............................................................................................................12 2.5.1 -
Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................ -
Public Factsheet on Survey Results Draft
King and Yolande Sustainability Review Community consultation survey results Sustainability reviews provide an opportunity Lake Burbury was the highest valued waterway, followed by for Hydro Tasmania to review our operations an even score for King River and Lake Margaret, then the Yolande River. in the catchments we use for hydropower. In the community consultation survey, we What you value the most asked for your thoughts on how you use and value the waterways in the King and Yolande The most important topics catchment-wide were bushwalking, tourism and experiencing nature, which were catchments. all selected by over 50% of respondents. Some topics were valued higher at Lake Burbury, including access for Community consultation survey recreation, scenic view points and bird watching. Land conservation scored equally between the waterways. The community consultation survey was open from 27 September until 31 October 2019. We asked you what you Highest ranked concerns and opportunities value most about the waterways within the King and Yolande catchments, including Lake Burbury, the King River, The five greatest concerns and opportunities for Lake Margaret and the Yolande River. The survey also improvement across the catchments were management of allowed us to understand your concerns in the catchments, weeds and pests, water quality, protection of threatened and where you think we can improve management or plants and animals, access for recreation, and signage (see figure below). Survey responses focused on: operations. • Updating signage with cultural heritage and There were 22 responses to the survey. Over half were from conservation information. local residents in or near the catchments, and more than 60% were recreational users or were involved in tourism in • Water quality at Lake Burbury and Lake Margaret. -
Lake Margaret Feasibility Study Volume 1: Main Report
LAKE MARGARET FEASIBILITY STUDY VOLUME 1: MAIN REPORT Prepared by: HYDRO ELECTRIC CORPORATION ARBN 072 377 158 ABN 48 072 377 158 4 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Tasmania, Australia Lake Margaret Feasibility Study This page left intentionally blank Hydro Tasmania Page ii Lake Margaret Feasibility Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and background The Lake Margaret Power Scheme, which began producing electricity in 1914, is one of the oldest hydropower schemes in Australia and is an area of outstanding heritage significance. It is an example of the pioneering period of hydro-electric development in Australia. Due principally to its private ownership and continuous operation for most of its life, the site has retained nearly all of its early infrastructure and equipment. The scheme consists of the following major assets: • Lake Margaret Dam (post tensioned concrete gravity dam). • King Billy pine woodstave pipeline, transporting water from the dam to the penstock. • Penstock. • Upper power station. • Lower power station, (decommissioned in 1994). • Lake Margaret Village, including seven cottages and a community hall. The site has been provisionally listed on the Tasmanian Heritage Register (THR) and is currently being assessed for National Heritage Listing. The provisional listing on the THR holds the same legislative requirement as a full listing, which means any redevelopment would require approval from the Tasmanian Heritage Council. Hydro Tasmania took over ownership of the scheme in 1985 from the Mt Lyell Mining and Railway Company and, until its closure in June 2006, the scheme produced approximately 0.5% of Tasmania’s total electricity output. The aging power station was closed on 30 June 2006, primarily due to safety concerns regarding the woodstave hilltop pipeline, which had been assessed as being at end of life and at risk of failure. -
The Philosophers' Tale
1 Photo: Ollie Khedun Photo: THE VISION THE CONCEPT THE PROPOSAL The Philosophers’ Tale is The West Coast Range consists The Next Iconic Walk – The of 6 mountains on a north south Philosophers’ Tale 2019 proposal more than just an iconic walk, ridge. The ridge is trisected by the – Chapter One: Owen, takes it is made up of a series of Lyell Highway (between Mt Lyell people on a journey over 28km in iconic walks to be developed and Mt Owen) and the King River 3 days and 2 nights experiencing Gorge (between Mt Huxley and Mt mountain peaks, incredible views, over a period of time. There Jukes). This makes for three distinct button grass plains, cantilever are an abundance of coastal regions, each with their own part platforms and suspension bridges walks – the Overland Track to play in telling the bigger story. over deep river gorges down into All areas have been impacted cool temperate rainforest, majestic is now mature, and people by mining exploration or other waterfalls along the tranquil King are looking for the next development in the past 100 years. River on the incredible West Coast of Tasmania. With the option to option – The Philosophers’ The area is naturally divided into finish via train, hi-rail, raft, kayak, four zones, or in story telling Tale is just that. People will helicopter or jet boat, making it a parlance, ‘Chapters’. The Chapters be drawn locally and across truly unforgettable experience. (outlined on page 8), let’s call them the globe to experience these Owen, Jukes, Lyell and Tyndall lead View West Coast video iconic walks, returning time easily to the staged construction of any proposed track works. -
Christoff Le Grange Development Director Entura, Hydro Tasmania
Christoff le Grange Development Director Entura, Hydro Tasmania Hydro Tasmania’s experience with small, mini and micro hydros The island State of Tasmania - separate to mainland Australia Overview •Population: 500,000 people. •World heritage area: 1.38 million hectares. Figure 1. Tasmanian average annual rainfall distribution The island State of Tasmania - separate to mainland Australia • Covers 1% of Australia’s landmass. • Receives 12% of Australia’s annual rainfall. • Economic growth and development over the past century has been driven by hydro-industrialisation (forestry, tourism, agriculture, fishing). The facts • Government Business Enterprise - owned by the State of Tasmania but operates as a commercial business with a consulting unit (Entura). • Australia’s largest renewable energy generator: o $5.1 billion worth of assets o 2 500 MW of hydro-electric capacity in Tasmania o 10 000 GWh of output in 2009/10. Hydro power • Hydro power is the basis of our renewable energy business and expertise (special water licence that provides access to water). Hydro power • Almost a century of expertise in power engineering and dam construction, and renewable development. • Thirty hydro-electric power stations (60 machines from 1 MW to 165 MW) in an integrated system, more than 50 large dams. Lake Margaret in operation from 1914 • Redevelopment of the power station and wooden pipeline ($14.7 million) was completed July 2009. • Station has installed capacity of 8.6 MW. • Provides 50 GWh of additional energy powering around 4 000 Tasmanian homes. Lake Margaret in operation from 1914 • Lower Lake Margaret mini-hydro has also undergone redevelopment. • Installed capacity of 3.2 MW or around 22 GWh of extra output. -
Hobart Derwent Bridge
LSC DH NF LSC LSC TW BO NN DONAGHYS HILL LOOKOUT NELSON FALLS NATURE TRAIL LAKE ST CLAIR THE WALL BOTHWELL Pause for a break on the road and take the Stretch your legs and make the short climb to Australia’s deepest lake was carved out by glaciers. It’s the end This large-scale artwork is lifetime’s work for self- Established in the 1820s by settler-graziers from Scotland easy walk to a lookout point over buttongrass see a rainforest cascade. point of the famous Overland Track, one of the world’s best multi- taught sculptor Greg Duncan, who is carving the stories (with some notable Welsh and Irish connections) this town plains to see a bend of the upper Franklin day walks. Spend an hour or so in the Lake St Clair Park Centre, of the high country in 100 panels of Huon pine, each has more than 50 heritage-listed buildings. It is the site River – on the skyline is the white quartzite where you’ll learn about the region’s amazing geology, fascinating three metres high and a metre wide. of Australia’s oldest golf course, on the historic property summit of Frenchmans Cap. Lake Burbury flora & fauna and rich human heritage. ‘Ratho’. ‘Nant’ is another of the town’s heritage properties TO THE WEST: explore wilderness, Lake St Clair and the source of acclaimed single-malt whisky. TO THE EAST: follow the Derwent Queenstown QU Nelson Falls discover wild history LH NF Nature Trail LSC down to a city by the sea THE WALL Bronte Park THE LYELL HIGHWAY WR Derwent Bridge TW Linking the West Coast with Hobart, the highway you’re on ST crosses the high country of the Central Plateau and runs Strahan through the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. -
Lake Margaret Project Tasmania El29/2008 Annual
ABN 31 109 933 995 LAKE MARGARET PROJECT TASMANIA EL29/2008 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 9th June 2010 – 9th June 2011 Tenement Holder/Manager Bass Metals Ltd. 16 Thelma Street West Perth, WA, 6005 Geologist: Keith Cameron-Smith, B.Sc (Hons) Senior Exploration Geologist Prepared By: Sally Bates, B.App.Sc (Geol) Tenement Geologist Hellyer Exploration Base, TAS Distribution: Mineral Resources Tasmania Clancy Exploration Bass Metals Ltd Disclaimer The conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report / table represent the opinions of the Authors based upon the data available and provided to them. The opinions and recommendations provided from this information are in response to a request from the client and no liability is accepted for commercial decisions or actions resulting from them. Note: All figures and grids are according to the GDA94, Zone 55 datum otherwise stated EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bass Metals Ltd (BSM) commenced management of the Lake Margaret exploration licence (EL29/2008) on 9 July 2010. This tenement is in joint venture with Geoinformatics Exploration Tasmania where Bass Metals is the Holder/Manager. For this 1st year of tenure ended 9 July 2011 work conducted on the licence has included - ICP trace element/SWIR data collection, 8777 spectral measurements from 56 holes and 1467 lithogeochemical samples were collected. A 3 hole diamond drilling program targeting the source of a high grade glacial erratic totalling 448.6m: o LMD2 aim was to test the North Lyell position adjacent to the Great Lyell Fault. This hole did not fully test the position and is considered to have test below the position, follow up drilling is planned. -
Western Lakes Fishery Management Plan 2002
Wilderness Fishery Western Lakes Western November 2002 F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN WESTERN LAKES WESTERN LAKES F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN November 2002 November 2002 Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan November 2002 Executive Summary Introduction This fishery management plan is a subsidiary plan under the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan (WHA plan). The plan covers all areas of responsibility for which the Inland Fisheries Service (IFS) has statutory control; freshwater native species, freshwater recreational fisheries, and freshwater commercial fisheries. The plan also makes several recommendations on land management issues for consideration by the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS). The area covered by the plan includes the Central Plateau Conservation Area west of the Lake Highway and the Walls of Jerusalem National Park, both of which lie within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Environment This section examines the impacts of users (primarily anglers) on the environment and specifically water quality, and how these impacts can be minimised while maintaining angling opportunities. Management prescriptions focus on monitoring and review of water quality and the impacts of boating, wading and weir construction in various waters, and where necessary, implementing remediation measures. An information and education approach with the particular emphasis on the use of signage, will play an important role. Establishment of alternative boating access outside of the Western Lakes, development of a boating code of practice and review of current boating regulations will assist in minimising boating impacts. Additionally, the IFS will encourage and support studies that examine the impacts of boating and wading. -
Byes Hut Management Plan
BYE’S HOUSE, GREAT LAKE Historic Heritage Plan of Management Final Report prepared for Hydro Tasmania Consulting 20 December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 CLIENT AND PROJECT DETAILS ................................................................................................................4 1.2 AUTHORSHIP..........................................................................................................................................4 1.3 APPROACH ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 DISCLAIMER........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 HERITAGE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 6 2.1 GENERIC COVENANT V3 03 OCT 2006 ...................................................................................................6 2.2 NATURE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT V3 TEMPLATE.............................................................................6 3.0 ILLUSTRATED HISTORICAL