No Ordinary Place. No Ordinary Festival
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Around the Bend
Cultural Studies Review volume 18 number 1 March 2012 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/index pp. 86–106 Emily Bullock 2012 Around the Bend The Curious Power of the Hills around Queenstown, Tasmania EMILY BULLOCK UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Approaching the town of Queenstown you can’t help but be taken aback by the sight of the barren hillsides, hauntingly bare yet strangely beautiful. This lunar landscape has a majestic, captivating quality. In December 1994 after 101 years of continuous mining—A major achievement for a mining company—the Mount Lyell Mining and Railway Company called it a day and closed the operation thus putting Queenstown under threat of becoming a ghost town. Now, with the mine under the ownership of Copper Mines of Tasmania, the town and the mine are once again thriving. Although Queenstown is primarily a mining town, it is also a very popular tourist destination offering visitors unique experiences. So, head for the hills and discover Queenstown—a unique piece of ‘Space’ on earth.1 In his discussion of the labour of the negative in Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labour of the Negative, Michael Taussig opens out into a critique of criticism. ISSN 1837-8692 Criticism, says Taussig, is in some way a defacement, a tearing away at an object that ends up working its magic on the critic and forging a ‘curious complicity’ between object and critic.2 Taussig opens up a critical space in which to think with the object of analysis, cutting through transcendental critique, as a critical defacement, which, in the very act of cutting, produces negative energy: a ‘contagious, proliferating, voided force’ in which the small perversities of ‘laughter, bottom-spanking, eroticism, violence, and dismemberment exist simultaneously in violent silence’.3 This complicity in thinking might be charged by critical methodologies which engage in, and think through, peripatetic movements. -
Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000
Certificate of Registration ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - ISO 14001:2015 This is to certify that: Hydro Tasmania 4 Elizabeth Street Hobart TAS 7000 Holds Certificate Number: EMS 603522 and operates an Environmental Management System which complies with the requirements of ISO 14001:2015 for the following scope: Operation, maintenance and management of electricity generation facilities including power stations (hydroelectric, solar, diesel and wind), distribution network, associated lakes and waterways. For and on behalf of BSI: Chris Cheung, Head of Compliance & Risk - Asia Pacific Original Registration Date: 1998-05-15 Effective Date: 2018-11-12 Latest Revision Date: 2018-11-16 Expiry Date: 2021-11-28 Page: 1 of 3 This certificate was issued electronically and remains the property of BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211 and is bound by the conditions of contract. This certificate can be verified at www.bsi-global.com/clientdirectory. Printed copies can be validated at www.bsi-global.com/ClientDirectory. Further clarifications regarding the scope of this certificate and the applicability of ISO 14001:2015 requirements may be obtained by consulting the organization. This certificate is valid only if provided original copies are in complete set. Information and Contact: BSI, Kitemark Court, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill, Milton Keynes MK5 8PP. Tel: + 44 345 080 9000 BSI Assurance UK Limited, registered in England under number 7805321 at 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, UK. Information and Contact: BSI Group ANZ Pty Limited, ACN 078 659 211: Suite 2, Level 7, 15 Talavera Road, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113 A Member of the BSI Group of Companies. -
Hydro 4 Water Storage
TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation. -
Mount Lyell Abt Railway Tasmania
Mount Lyell Abt Railway Tasmania Nomination for Engineers Australia Engineering Heritage Recognition Volume 2 Prepared by Ian Cooper FIEAust CPEng (Retired) For Abt Railway Ministerial Corporation & Engineering Heritage Tasmania July 2015 Mount Lyell Abt Railway Engineering Heritage nomination Vol2 TABLE OF CONTENTS BIBLIOGRAPHIES CLARKE, William Branwhite (1798-1878) 3 GOULD, Charles (1834-1893) 6 BELL, Charles Napier, (1835 - 1906) 6 KELLY, Anthony Edwin (1852–1930) 7 STICHT, Robert Carl (1856–1922) 11 DRIFFIELD, Edward Carus (1865-1945) 13 PHOTO GALLERY Cover Figure – Abt locomotive train passing through restored Iron Bridge Figure A1 – Routes surveyed for the Mt Lyell Railway 14 Figure A2 – Mount Lyell Survey Team at one of their camps, early 1893 14 Figure A3 – Teamsters and friends on the early track formation 15 Figure A4 - Laying the rack rail on the climb up from Dubbil Barril 15 Figure A5 – Cutting at Rinadeena Saddle 15 Figure A6 – Abt No. 1 prior to dismantling, packaging and shipping to Tasmania 16 Figure A7 – Abt No. 1 as changed by the Mt Lyell workshop 16 Figure A8 – Schematic diagram showing Abt mechanical motion arrangement 16 Figure A9 – Twin timber trusses of ‘Quarter Mile’ Bridge spanning the King River 17 Figure A10 – ‘Quarter Mile’ trestle section 17 Figure A11 – New ‘Quarter Mile’ with steel girder section and 3 Bailey sections 17 Figure A12 – Repainting of Iron Bridge following removal of lead paint 18 Figure A13 - Iron Bridge restoration cross bracing & strengthening additions 18 Figure A14 – Iron Bridge new -
Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................ -
3966 Tour Op 4Col
The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places, -
The Geology, Geochemistry and Structure of the Mount Darwin - South Darwin Peak Area, Western Tasmania
The Geology, Geochemistry and Structure of the Mount Darwin - South Darwin Peak Area, Western Tasmania. by Andrew Thomas Jones B.App.Sci.(RMIT) A thesis submitted in partial fulfihnent of the requirements for the degree ofBachelor of Science with Honours. CE:-iTRE FOR ORE DEPOSIT A:"/D EXPLORATION STUDIES Geology Department, University ofTasmania, November 1993. Abstract The Cambrian Darwin Granite intrudes calc-alkaline rhyolites of the Central Volcanic Complex on the Darwin Plateau, western Tasmania. Two distinct granite phases are recognised, an equigranular granite and a granodiorite. A biotite grade contact aureole is preserved in the Central Volcanic Complex immediate to the Darwin Granite. Debris flow deposits of volcaniclastic conglomerates and sandstones, and coherent dacite lavas of the Mid - Late Cambrian Tyndall Group unconformably overlie the Darwin Granite and Central Volcanic Complex, and are in turn overlain unconformably by pebble to boulder conglomerates of the siliciclastic Owen Conglomerate. Stratigraphic and structural evidence recognise three deformation periods within the Mt Darwin - South Darwin Peak area: the Mid - Late Cambrian, Late Cambrian - Early Ordovician, and the Devonian Tabberabberan Orogeny. Mid - Late Cambrian deformation, evidenced by granitic and foliated volcanic clasts in basal Tyndall Group conglomerate, indicates catastrophic uplift and subsequent unroofing of the granite prior to Tyndall Group deposition. This unconformity represents a significant Cambrian hiatus in the southern Mount Read Volcanics. A second unconformit)r between the Tyndall Group and the Owen Conglomerate marks cessation of Tyndall Group deposition with the onset of deposition of large volumes of siliceous detritus. The two Devonian Tabberabberan-related deformations are characterised by, NW and N trending dextral strike slip faulting and locally intense N-trending cleavage development. -
Public Factsheet on Survey Results Draft
King and Yolande Sustainability Review Community consultation survey results Sustainability reviews provide an opportunity Lake Burbury was the highest valued waterway, followed by for Hydro Tasmania to review our operations an even score for King River and Lake Margaret, then the Yolande River. in the catchments we use for hydropower. In the community consultation survey, we What you value the most asked for your thoughts on how you use and value the waterways in the King and Yolande The most important topics catchment-wide were bushwalking, tourism and experiencing nature, which were catchments. all selected by over 50% of respondents. Some topics were valued higher at Lake Burbury, including access for Community consultation survey recreation, scenic view points and bird watching. Land conservation scored equally between the waterways. The community consultation survey was open from 27 September until 31 October 2019. We asked you what you Highest ranked concerns and opportunities value most about the waterways within the King and Yolande catchments, including Lake Burbury, the King River, The five greatest concerns and opportunities for Lake Margaret and the Yolande River. The survey also improvement across the catchments were management of allowed us to understand your concerns in the catchments, weeds and pests, water quality, protection of threatened and where you think we can improve management or plants and animals, access for recreation, and signage (see figure below). Survey responses focused on: operations. • Updating signage with cultural heritage and There were 22 responses to the survey. Over half were from conservation information. local residents in or near the catchments, and more than 60% were recreational users or were involved in tourism in • Water quality at Lake Burbury and Lake Margaret. -
A Review of Geoconservation Values
Geoconservation Values of the TWWHA and Adjacent Areas 3.0 GEOCONSERVATION AND GEOHERITAGE VALUES OF THE TWWHA AND ADJACENT AREAS 3.1 Introduction This section provides an assessment of the geoconservation (geoheritage) values of the TWWHA, with particular emphasis on the identification of geoconservation values of World Heritage significance. This assessment is based on: • a review (Section 2.3.2) of the geoconservation values cited in the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989); • a review of relevant new scientific data that has become available since 1989 (Section 2.4); and: • the use of contemporary procedures for rigorous justification of geoconservation significance (see Section 2.2) in terms of the updated World Heritage Criteria (UNESCO 1999; see this report Section 2.3.3). In general, this review indicates that the major geoconservation World Heritage values of the TWWHA identified in 1989 are robust and remain valid. However, only a handful of individual sites or features in the TWWHA are considered to have World Heritage value in their own right, as physical features considered in isolation (eg, Exit Cave). In general it is the diversity, extent and inter-relationships between numerous features, sites, areas or processes that gives World Heritage significance to certain geoheritage “themes” in the TWWHA (eg, the "Ongoing Natural Geomorphic and Soil Process Systems" and “Late Cainozoic "Ice Ages" and Climate Change Record” themes). This "wholistic" principle under-pinned the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989, p. 27; see this report Section 2.3.2), and is strongly supported by the present review (see discussion and justification of this principle in Section 2.2). -
Lake Margaret Feasibility Study Volume 1: Main Report
LAKE MARGARET FEASIBILITY STUDY VOLUME 1: MAIN REPORT Prepared by: HYDRO ELECTRIC CORPORATION ARBN 072 377 158 ABN 48 072 377 158 4 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Tasmania, Australia Lake Margaret Feasibility Study This page left intentionally blank Hydro Tasmania Page ii Lake Margaret Feasibility Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and background The Lake Margaret Power Scheme, which began producing electricity in 1914, is one of the oldest hydropower schemes in Australia and is an area of outstanding heritage significance. It is an example of the pioneering period of hydro-electric development in Australia. Due principally to its private ownership and continuous operation for most of its life, the site has retained nearly all of its early infrastructure and equipment. The scheme consists of the following major assets: • Lake Margaret Dam (post tensioned concrete gravity dam). • King Billy pine woodstave pipeline, transporting water from the dam to the penstock. • Penstock. • Upper power station. • Lower power station, (decommissioned in 1994). • Lake Margaret Village, including seven cottages and a community hall. The site has been provisionally listed on the Tasmanian Heritage Register (THR) and is currently being assessed for National Heritage Listing. The provisional listing on the THR holds the same legislative requirement as a full listing, which means any redevelopment would require approval from the Tasmanian Heritage Council. Hydro Tasmania took over ownership of the scheme in 1985 from the Mt Lyell Mining and Railway Company and, until its closure in June 2006, the scheme produced approximately 0.5% of Tasmania’s total electricity output. The aging power station was closed on 30 June 2006, primarily due to safety concerns regarding the woodstave hilltop pipeline, which had been assessed as being at end of life and at risk of failure. -
C:\Documents and Settings\Alan Smithee\My Documents\MOTM
Itkx1//7Lhmdq`knesgdLnmsg9Rshbgshsd Our ongoing search for new minerals to feature finds us scouring the more than forty separate shows that comprise the Tucson Gem & Mineral show every year, looking for large lots of interesting and attractive minerals. The search is rewarded when we make a new contact and find something especially vibrant like this month’s combination of lavender stichtite in green serpentinite! OGXRHB@K OQNODQSHDR Chemistry: Mg6Cr2(CO3)(OH)16A4H2O Basic Hydrous Magnesium Chromium Carbonate (Hydrous Magnesium Chromium Carbonate Hydroxide) Class: Carbonates Subclass: Carbonates with hydroxyl or halogen radicals Group: Hydrotalcite Crystal System: Trigonal Crystal Habits: Crystals rarely macroscopic; usually as crust-like aggregates in matrix; sometimes radiating, micaceous with flexible plates, and nodular with tuberous, irregular surface projections; also massive and fibrous. Color: Lavender, lilac, light violet, pink, or purplish. Luster: Waxy, greasy, sometimes pearly. Transparency: Transparent to translucent Streak: White to pale lilac Refractive Index: 1.516-1.542 Cleavage: Perfect in one direction Fracture: Uneven, brittle. Hardness: 1.5-2.0 Specific Gravity: 2.2 Luminescence: None Distinctive Features and Tests: Softness, color, crystal habits, occurrence in chromium-rich metamorphic environments, and frequent association with serpentinite (a greenish metamorphic rock). Stichtite can be confused with similarly colored sugilite [potassium sodium iron manganese aluminum lithium silicate, KNa2(Fe,Mn,Al)2Li2Si12O30]. -
UR.Lcr85"~ 56 1985/58
UR.lcr85"~ 56 1985/58. West Coast gravity tie stations R.G. Richardson M.J. Dix This report presents absolute gravity values for a series of tie stations on the west coast of Tasmania. Intervals were measured using Worden gravity meter W913 and Sodin gravity meter S183 with a minimum of six measurements of each interval. The measured interval between Hobart Airport and Strahan Airport was in error by 2.1 ~m/sec2 and between Strahan and Smithton Airports was in error by 0.2 ~/sec2. All observed gravity values have an error of less than 1 ~/sec2. The observed gravity values are given in Table I and the station locations are shown on Figure 1. Table 1. GRAVITY TIE STATIONS, WEST COAST GRAVITY SURVEY Location Number Adjusted gravity AMG reference value (~m/sec') Ouse 8451.9004 9.8036534 476500, 5296100 Wayatinah 8451. 9005 9.8031976 460100, 5308300 (Liapootah) Tarraleah 8451. 9006 9.8024509 454550, 5316120 Bronte 8451.9007 9.8021387 457550, 5331300 Derwent Bridge 8451. 9008 9.8020928 436350, 5334650 Collingwood River 8451. 9009 9.8028353 410500, 5331450 Gormanston 8051. 9905 9.8027416 383500, 5341000 Gormanston 8551. 9975 9.8027423 383500, 5341000 (alternative) Queenstown 8451. 9010 9.8030527 378300, 5340900 Strahan 6491. 9136 9.8037169 358800, 5331700 Zeehan 8451. 9011 9.8029800 366000, 5362300 Rosebery 8051. 9906 9.8028124 378600, 5373500 Tullah 8051. 9902 9.8027489 385200, 5378200 Que River 8451. 9012 9.8017797 389450, 5393950 Que River 8551.9976 9.8017750 389550, 5393950 (alternative) Fingerpost 8451.9013 9.8018200 383400, 5412100 (Waratah) Parrawe 8451.9014 9.8019949 381400, 5427700 Yolla 8451.9015 9.8022770 392400, 5446400 Wynyard 8451.