DOCSLIB.ORG

Byes Hut Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Byes Hut Management Plan BYE’S HOUSE, GREAT LAKE Historic Heritage Plan of Management Final Report prepared for Hydro Tasmania Consulting 20 December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 CLIENT AND PROJECT DETAILS ................................................................................................................4 1.2 AUTHORSHIP..........................................................................................................................................4 1.3 APPROACH ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 DISCLAIMER........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 HERITAGE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 6 2.1 GENERIC COVENANT V3 03 OCT 2006 ...................................................................................................6 2.2 NATURE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT V3 TEMPLATE.............................................................................6 3.0 ILLUSTRATED HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ..................................................................7 3.0.1 Summary of property ownership ............................................................................................... 7 3.0.2 Summary of Sandbanks’ tenancy (according to G Hardstaff, Cider gums & currawongs) . 7 3.1 EUROPEAN OCCUPATION OF THE GREAT LAKE AREA, C.1815 - 1900........................................................ 7 3.2 THE GREAT LAKE POWER SCHEME, 1900-1950S..................................................................................11 3.3 EXPANSION OF THE GREAT LAKE POWER SCHEME, 1950S - PRESENT................................................... 15 4.0 PHYSICAL RECORD .................................................................................................18 4.1 SITE SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS....................................................................................................... 18 4.1.1 Location and Access to the Site.................................................................................................. 18 4.1.2 The Hay Shed.............................................................................................................................. 18 4.1.3 The Bye’s House Complex .......................................................................................................... 21 4.1.4 Garage/Stable/Shearing Shed Complex ..................................................................................23 4.1.5 Sheep Dip ....................................................................................................................................24 4.1.6 Other Elements within the Complex .........................................................................................25 4.2 BYE’S HOUSE ....................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 Exterior – Foundations, Walls & Roof ..................................................................................... 27 4.2.2 House Chimney .......................................................................................................................... 31 4.2.3 Interior Spaces including Fixtures ........................................................................................... 31 5.0 CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE..................................................................................... 40 5.1 DISCUSSION OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................40 5.2 COMPARING BYE’S HOUSE ................................................................................................................... 41 5.2.1 Identifying other Places to Compare With...............................................................................42 5.2.2 The Comparison.........................................................................................................................44 5.3 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................................45 Table 1: Assessment of Significance ..................................................................................................46 5.3.1 Statement of Significance ..........................................................................................................49 6.0 CONSERVATION POLICIES..................................................................................... 50 6.1 OBJECTIVES &TERMS ..........................................................................................................................50 6.2 KEY CONSERVATION POLICIES ............................................................................................................. 51 Table 2: Strategies & Actions .............................................................................................................53 6.3 RECORDING CHANGE...........................................................................................................................53 6.4 INTERPRETATION.................................................................................................................................53 6.5 REVIEW OF THIS PLAN OF MANAGEMENT.............................................................................................54 7.0 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE .....................................................................................55 7.1 BYE’S HOUSE........................................................................................................................................ 55 7.1.1 Exterior........................................................................................................................................ 55 7.1.1.1 Roofing & Guttering................................................................................................................. 55 7.1.1.2 Flat sheet and cgi exterior wall cladding............................................................................... 55 Bye’s House, Great Lake 20 December 2010 Historic Heritage Plan of Management 2 7.1.1.3 Exposed timber elements......................................................................................................... 55 7.1.1.4 Window sill (east wall, northern-most window) .................................................................. 55 7.1.1.5 Chimney.................................................................................................................................... 55 7.1.2 Bye’s House Interior...................................................................................................................56 7.1.2.1 Mattresses ................................................................................................................................56 7.1.2.2 Fireplace...................................................................................................................................56 7.2 CYCLICAL &CATCH UP MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE...............................................................................56 Table 3: Cyclical Maintenance Schedule – Bye’s House .................................................................. 57 Table 4: Cyclical Maintenance Schedule – Hay Shed......................................................................60 8.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 62 8.1 SECONDARY REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................62 8.1.1 Published .....................................................................................................................................62 8.1.2 Unpublished................................................................................................................................62 8.2 PRIMARY REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................63 8.2.1 Archives Office of Tasmania .....................................................................................................63 8.2.2 Central Plan Office ....................................................................................................................63 8.2.3 Deeds Office................................................................................................................................63 APPENDIX 1: CHAIN OF TITLE ..................................................................................... 64 APPENDIX 2: VALUATION ROLLS (SELECT) ............................................................... 65 APPENDIX 3: DOG KENNELS........................................................................................ 66 APPENDIX 4: POWER POLE ..........................................................................................67 APPENDIX 5: WATER TANK STAND AND TANKS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description Distribution and Habitat Mole Creek Cave Beetle
    THREATENED SPECIES LISTING STATEMENT Mole Creek Cave Beetle, Tasmanotrechus cockerilli Moore 1972 Status Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.............................…...........…………………………………....Not listed Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995…………………....Rare Description The Mole Creek cave beetle is found only in caves; Tasmanotrechus cockerilli such species are referred to as ‘troglobites’. Troglobitic beetles show varying degrees of adaptation to a cave existence, including loss of body colouring, a reduction or complete loss of eyes, and a lengthening of legs and other appendages. The Mole Creek cave beetle is small (body length approximately 6 mm), with an elongated head and vestigial eyes. For a full description refer to Moore (1972). Distribution and Habitat Tasmanotrechus cockerilli is known only from the 5mm Mole Creek karst system in central north Tasmania. Within this cave system it is fairly widely distributed, Illustration: Karen Richards having so far been located in nine caves, however, the species is extremely rare in the caves where it has been found (Eberhard et al. 1991). A number of specimens of a beetle very similar to the Mole Creek cave beetle were also collected by Eberhard (2000) from six new cave sites within the Mole Creek karst system. These have been tentatively assigned to the same species. However, the specimens have yet to be formally identified as belonging to the species T. cockerilli. The species is confined mostly to the deep cave zone, where it is found under stones, in or near flood litter, and on moist surfaces near water. Occasionally the species has also been found some distance from permanent water.
    [Show full text]
  • Derwent Catchment Review
    Derwent Catchment Review PART 1 Introduction and Background Prepared for Derwent Catchment Review Steering Committee June, 2011 By Ruth Eriksen, Lois Koehnken, Alistair Brooks and Daniel Ray Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Scope and Need....................................................................................................1 2 Physical setting......................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Catchment description......................................................................................................2 2.2 Geology and Geomorphology ...........................................................................................5 2.3 Rainfall and climate...........................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Current climate ............................................................................................................9 2.3.2 Future climate............................................................................................................10 2.4 Vegetation patterns ........................................................................................................12 2.5 River hydrology ...............................................................................................................12 2.5.1
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Deborah Hunter President, Friends of Great Western Tiers Kooparoona Niara Conservation Officer, Mole Creek Caving Club. Corres
    Deborah Hunter President, Friends of Great Western Tiers Kooparoona Niara Conservation Officer, Mole Creek Caving Club. Correspondence: Submission for the Senate inquiry 15th April 2016 The response to, and lessons learnt from, recent fires in remote Tasmanian wilderness affecting the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, with particular reference to: a. the impact of global warming on fire frequency and magnitude; b. the availability and provisions of financial, human and mechanical resources; c. the adequacy of fire assessment and modelling capacity; d. Australia’s obligations as State Party to the World Heritage Convention; e. world best practice in remote area fire management; and f. any related matter. 1 Preamble This submission concerns the fire known as the Lake Mackenzie, Tasmanian Fire Service (TFS) incident number 236227. It later became known as the Mersey Forest complex of fires. We welcome any opportunity to make further representation should there be hearings into the fires. The catastrophic losses incurred elsewhere in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) and high conservation value areas of recognised World Heritage status, 1 such as the Tarkine forests (takayna) are acknowledged but are beyond the scope of this submission. In making this submission, we express the greatest respect for all personnel involved in the dangerous and protracted effort to control and contain the fires. We make this submission in the spirit of helping to understand, address and prevent such devastation in the future. The first Tasmanians are respectfully acknowledged as traditional owners of this land, as is the name kooparoona niara. 2 Summary It is submitted that • Research on climate change and fire response must be restored and increased including CSIRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Community News – February 2020
    COUNCIL COMMUNITY NEWS – FEBRUARY 2020 Council Notices Council appoints new General Manager Mr John Jordan will commence a four-year term as General Manager at the end of January 2020. John is currently working with Queensland Health and has extensive management experience in the Queensland public sector as well as with Brisbane City Council. He has demonstrated an ability to manage diverse issues in government and this experience will help lead Meander Valley in the next phase of its development. New support for community projects The Great Regional City Challenge has now launched and is offering individuals, groups and organisations the chance to share in > $100,000 of cash and support services. The funds and support are for projects that can help make Launceston and NE Tasmania one of the great regions of the world. Projects can focus on ways to build on our innovation and creativity, or our liveability, or our diversity or our connectedness. Meander Valley community groups are eligible to participate with local projects . A meeting for interested applicants has been scheduled for Thurs 13 Feb 3.30pm at Council Offices, Westbury. RSVP by 12/2 to 6393 5300 or [email protected]. https://launcestontogether.com.au/how-it-works . Work underway on major intersection upgrade on Westbury Road Work has commenced on the construction of a new roundabout at the intersection of Meander Valley Road and Westbury Road in Prospect Vale. This priority project is being undertaken at a cost of $1.6m, with funding from the Federal Liberal Government’s election commitment, the Commonwealth Government’s Infrastructure Investment Grant Programme and Meander Valley Council.
    [Show full text]
  • This Issue of Southern Caver Is Assumed to Be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464
    This issue of Southern Caver is assumed to be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464 SOUTHERN CAVER This index was compiled by Russell Fulton Typing: Nell Gill Published by the SOUTHERN CAVING SOCIETY Postal Address: P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania, 7009 Club Room 132 Davey Street, Hobart, 7000 OCTOBER 1985 1. INTRODUCTION This is an index to the contents of Southern Cavep published by the Southern Caving Society from Volume l'number 1 to Volume 12 number 4 and then in the new series numbers 49 to 51 inclusive. These were published between July 1967 and December 1982, a period spanning 15 years. The quarterly issue of the magazine ended with Volume 12 number 4 and it subsequently became an occasional publication commencing with number 49 (the magazines between Volume 1 and Volume 12 inclusive were counted as 48 issues). The Southern Caving Society was formed in April 1965 with the aim of furthering the exploration of Tasmanian caves and promoting their study and conservation. The Southern Cavep is an invaluable record of 15 years of Tasmanian speleology and the diversity of contributions to the magazine reflect a wide range of interests including for example, cave fauna, explora­ tion, diving in sea caves, snow cave geomorphology and underground photography. The list could go on. Copies of some of the issues are still available. For information on availability and cost, write to the Secretary, Southern Caving Society, P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania 7009. ARRANGEMENT OF THE INDEX There are 5 Sections A to E. These are: A. Tasmanian Caving Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • You'll Love Getting There
    You’ll love getting there SELF DRIVE Peppers Cradle Mountain Lodge is located 81km from Devonport The other route is via Derwent Bridge to Queenstown (A10) and (1½ hrs), 110km from Burnie (1½ hrs), 142km from Launceston (2½ up the West Coast on A10 through Zeehan, Rosebery and Tullah. hrs) and 375km from Hobart (4½ hrs). Allow additional travelling Turn right onto the C132 towards Cradle Mountain. This route takes time during adverse conditions. approximately 6 hours. Car rental is available through all major car rental companies in From Launceston – 2½ Hours Drive airport or city locations. Follow the signs from Launceston towards the North West Coast From Hobart – 4½ Hours Drive along the A1. Bypass the towns of Hagley, Westbury and Deloraine. At Elizabeth Town turn left (B13) towards Kimberley. At Kimberley There are two main routes to Peppers Cradle Mountain Lodge from cross the Mersey River and continue to Railton then turn left onto the Hobart. The most direct route takes you up the Midlands Highway (B14) to Sheffield. At Sheffield turn left (C136) following the signs to (A1) to Perth, and then through Sheffield, and will take around 4½ Cradle Mountain. You will travel through Claude Road and Gowrie hours. Park, crossing the Forth River at Cethana. At Moina turn left (C132). From Hobart follow the Midlands Highway (A1) north towards Perth After approximately 20km turn left at the intersection to Cradle travelling through Campbell Town. As you enter the town turn left Mountain. Follow this road for 4km and you will see the Lodge on towards Longford (B52).
    [Show full text]
  • Hobart Derwent Bridge
    LSC DH NF LSC LSC TW BO NN DONAGHYS HILL LOOKOUT NELSON FALLS NATURE TRAIL LAKE ST CLAIR THE WALL BOTHWELL Pause for a break on the road and take the Stretch your legs and make the short climb to Australia’s deepest lake was carved out by glaciers. It’s the end This large-scale artwork is lifetime’s work for self- Established in the 1820s by settler-graziers from Scotland easy walk to a lookout point over buttongrass see a rainforest cascade. point of the famous Overland Track, one of the world’s best multi- taught sculptor Greg Duncan, who is carving the stories (with some notable Welsh and Irish connections) this town plains to see a bend of the upper Franklin day walks. Spend an hour or so in the Lake St Clair Park Centre, of the high country in 100 panels of Huon pine, each has more than 50 heritage-listed buildings. It is the site River – on the skyline is the white quartzite where you’ll learn about the region’s amazing geology, fascinating three metres high and a metre wide. of Australia’s oldest golf course, on the historic property summit of Frenchmans Cap. Lake Burbury flora & fauna and rich human heritage. ‘Ratho’. ‘Nant’ is another of the town’s heritage properties TO THE WEST: explore wilderness, Lake St Clair and the source of acclaimed single-malt whisky. TO THE EAST: follow the Derwent Queenstown QU Nelson Falls discover wild history LH NF Nature Trail LSC down to a city by the sea THE WALL Bronte Park THE LYELL HIGHWAY WR Derwent Bridge TW Linking the West Coast with Hobart, the highway you’re on ST crosses the high country of the Central Plateau and runs Strahan through the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan
    Strategic Plan 2018-2021 Outside cover image: Pandani and views from Mount Anne, Southwest National Park. Inside cover image: Grass Point is a family-friendly walk, South Bruny Island National Park. CONTENTS 1 _________ MESSAGE FROM THE PREMIER OF TASMANIA 3 ________ MESSAGE FROM THE DEPUTY SECRETARY 5 ________OUR CONSERVATION FOOTPRINT 6 ________OUR ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES 7 ________OUR CORPORATE OBJECTIVES 8 ________OUR PRINCIPLES 11 _______INTEGRATED PLANNING 12 _______OUR ASPIRATIONS 15 _______OUR GOALS 17 _______ GOAL 1 – INSPIRING AND ENJOYABLE EXPERIENCES FOR VISITORS 23 ______ GOAL 2 – A HEALTHY, RESILIENT AND UNIQUELY TASMANIAN LANDSCAPE 29 ______ GOAL 3 – PRODUCTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE LAND USE THAT BENEFITS TASMANIA’S ECONOMY 35 ______ GOAL 4 – OUR ESTATE IS RELEVANT TO, AND VALUED BY, OUR COMMUNITIES 43 ______ GOAL 5 – A SUSTAINABLE, CAPABLE AND CONTEMPORARY ORGANISATION Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service acknowledges and pays respect to Tasmanian Aboriginal people as the traditional and original owners, and continuing custodians of this land and acknowledges Elders – past, present and emerging. Image: Star light, Ben Lomond National Park. Message from the PREMIER OF TASMANIA, Minister for Parks National parks are very important to the people of lutruita / Tasmania and to their way of life. They are important places for me and my family. We treasure our time in the outdoors and there is nowhere more beautiful in the world. I recognise the intrinsic values of our parks and reserves. That is why I deliberately chose to lead the Parks portfolio, to elevate the work of the Parks and Wildlife Service and our unique and extraordinary landscapes in the minds of both my Cabinet and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Lakes Fishery Management Plan 2002
    Wilderness Fishery Western Lakes Western November 2002 F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN WESTERN LAKES WESTERN LAKES F ISHERY M ANAGEMENT P LAN November 2002 November 2002 Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan Western Lakes – Fishery Management Plan November 2002 Executive Summary Introduction This fishery management plan is a subsidiary plan under the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan (WHA plan). The plan covers all areas of responsibility for which the Inland Fisheries Service (IFS) has statutory control; freshwater native species, freshwater recreational fisheries, and freshwater commercial fisheries. The plan also makes several recommendations on land management issues for consideration by the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS). The area covered by the plan includes the Central Plateau Conservation Area west of the Lake Highway and the Walls of Jerusalem National Park, both of which lie within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Environment This section examines the impacts of users (primarily anglers) on the environment and specifically water quality, and how these impacts can be minimised while maintaining angling opportunities. Management prescriptions focus on monitoring and review of water quality and the impacts of boating, wading and weir construction in various waters, and where necessary, implementing remediation measures. An information and education approach with the particular emphasis on the use of signage, will play an important role. Establishment of alternative boating access outside of the Western Lakes, development of a boating code of practice and review of current boating regulations will assist in minimising boating impacts. Additionally, the IFS will encourage and support studies that examine the impacts of boating and wading.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Systems Between 1997 and 2002, with the Addition of New Observations
    Status of Trout-free Waters in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Report to Department of Primary Industries, and Water, Hobart. PE Davies, LSJ Cook, WR Robinson, T Sloane June 2009 82 Waimea Ave, Sandy Bay, FFrreesshhwwaatteerr Tasmania Australia 7005 Ph/Fax: 03 62254660 SSyysstteemmss [email protected] Aquatiic Enviironmentall Consulltiing Serviice Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Aims and Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Aims ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Alien fish in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area .................................................. 6 1.3 Brown trout ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Value of trout-free waters ........................................................................................................ 8 2. Mapping the Distribution of Trout-free Waters ........................................................................... 10 2.1 Fish distribution database ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shannon River
    Shannon River WATER MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2018 September 2018 Overview The Shannon River Catchment Water Management Statement sets out how water resources in the Shannon River catchment (below Great Lake Dam at Miena) are allocated and the rules for taking water. This Statement explains the water management arrangements in the catchment that support the objectives of the Water Management Act 1999 (the Act) and are consistent with the planning principles of the National Water Initiative as administered by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (the Department). The Shannon River catchment (from Shannon Lagoon to the confluence with the Ouse River downstream of Hermitage) has an approximate area of 424 km2. It is a sub- catchment of the Greater Derwent catchment, which drains part of the Central Plateau. Water and Marine Resources Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Water Management Outcomes Water Managers The outcomes sought through the implementation The Department manages water extraction from of the described water management arrangements the Shannon River and its tributaries primarily in this Statement meet the objectives of the Act. through water licences issued under the Act. This will protect water availability for commercial users (i.e. for consumptive use), while ensuring The Shannon Catchment sits within the River town water supply, stock and domestic, and Shannon and Lower River Derwent Hydro-Electric environmental water needs are met. Water Districts. These two districts are administered by Hydro Tasmania. River Characteristics Hydro Tasmania manages Shannon Lagoon for Flows in the catchment have been modified since power generation at Poatina Power Station by the early 1900s when the Waddamana power pumping water into yingina/Great Lake.
    [Show full text]