Three Felonies a Day

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Felonies a Day Praise for Three Felonies a Day “Now comes veteran defense lawyer and civil libertarian Harvey A. Silverglate with riveting case studies exposing in technicolor a pat- tern of serious abuses and convictions of innocent people in some of the most famous (as well as obscure) federal cases of recent decades. Abetted by compliant courts and easily gulled media, the feds brand as criminals good people who intended no crime.” —Stuart Taylor, Jr., National Journal columnist and Newsweek contributing editor “In Three Felonies a Day, Harvey A. Silverglate has written a work peerless in revelations about the mad expansion of federal statutes whose result is to define, as criminal, practices no rational citizen could have viewed as illegal. The book is chilling in its detail of the investigations and ruin that have befallen people ground up in this prosecution mill. Whether in the book’s scathing chronicle of the destruction of Arthur Andersen, largest accounting firm in the nation, an obscure attorney, or the bizarre government case mounted against a Boston politician—to name a few—Harvey A. Silverglate brings home, unforgettably, the truth that everyone is vulnerable to the terrors wrought by out of control prosecutors. No one reading this can fail to be gripped by these cases, by the hard bright light he shines on every step of these prosecutions, and the mindset that created them. It’s a bombshell that was worth waiting for.” —Dorothy Rabinowitz, Wall Street Journal editorialist and a winner of the Pulitzer Prize (Continued) “Gilbert & Sullivan wrote about how the punishment fits the crime. Three Felonies a Day shows how federal prosecutors have conceived of something truly frightening—punishment without crime. Harvey A. Silverglate, one of the truly hard-working and uncompromising defenders of our civil liberties, has written the ultimate horror-story of prosecutorial abuse. We, the public, should pay attention.” —Errol Morris, documentary film-maker, winner of the Academy Award for The Fog of War, producer and director of the legendary documentary The Thin Blue Line “This brilliant book lays out the terrifying threat to human rights posed by vindictive federal prosecutions, often sold as moralistic crusades to a gullible press and public. Anyone who cares about American democ- racy should read this gripping and vitally important expose.” —Steven Pinker, Johnstone Family Professor, Harvard University, and author of The Stuff of Thought “Harvey A. Silverglate masterfully chronicles federal prosecutors’ vindictive enlistment of opaque criminal prohibitions to snare the unwary and to stunt civil society. A bloated criminal code that fails to warn before it strikes is tyranny’s first cousin.” —Bruce Fein, former associate deputy attorney general under President Reagan, and chairman of the American Freedom Agenda “Three Felonies a Day is one of the most important books to be written about law in a generation. It should be read by anyone who cares about the rule of law.… Law-abiding citizens beware: Prosecutors wield Godlike power as they decide how to interpret vague and open- ended statutes that can turn the stuff of everyday life into a federal case. Individual freedom and the rule of law hang in the balance. Three Felonies a Day is more than a brilliant collection of great stories about law, although it is sure that: it is a manifesto from one of America’s staunchest defenders of civil liberties demanding that all of us join in the fight for true freedom and the rule of law.” —Susan R. Estrich, Robert Kingsley Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Southern California “In Three Felonies a Day, Harvey A. Silverglate zeroes in on govern- mental misconduct—the brazen abuse by certain federal prosecutors of immense government power for purposes other than justice. The book is a clarion call—to prosecutors, reminding them what their true role is in a democracy—and to the public, reminding everyone of our collective responsibility firmly to oppose, discipline and prohibit such unacceptable abuses in order to protect the Constitution and the rights it guarantees. The book is a compelling read.” —Michael S. Greco, former president of the American Bar Association “To many readers, the book will read like a highlight reel of the most prominent and challenging cases to be brought in recent years…. Silverglate deftly combines the legal sophistication of a criminal de- fense expert with the plain speech and driving narrative of a journalist.” —Matthew W. Hutchins, The Harvard Law Record (Continued) “[Three Felonies a Day] argues that federal criminal law is so com- prehensive and vague that all Americans violate it every day, meaning prosecutors can indict anyone at all.” —Adam Liptak, The New York Times “Technology exacerbates the problem of laws so open and vague that they are hard to abide by, to the point that we have all become poten- tial criminals. Boston civil-liberties lawyer Harvey Silverglate calls his new book ‘Three Felonies a Day,’ referring to the number of crimes he estimates the average American now unwittingly commits because of vague laws.” —L. Gordon Crovitz, The Wall Street Journal “After studying dozens of prosecutions dating back 25 years, among them cases he worked on and several that were tried in Massachusetts federal court, Silverglate concludes that federal criminal laws have run amok, enabling overzealous prosecutors to pin flimsy, headline-grab- bing crimes on any one of us—even for well-intended behavior that does not appear to violate any law.” —Tom Mashberg, The Boston Herald “In a work that is sure to stir sharp public debate, veteran defense-attor- ney-turned-author Harvey A. Silverglate examines the legally and politi- cally charged issues surrounding recent federal criminal prosecutions.” —Robert A. Cornetta, presiding justice of the Salem District Court Three Felonies a Day How the Feds Target the Innocent harvey a. silverglate ENCOUNTER BOOKS new york • London Copyright © 2009 by Harvey A. Silverglate New Material © 2011 by Harvey A. Silverglate All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Encounter Books, 900 Broadway, Suite 601, New York, New York, 10003. First American edition published in 2009 by Encounter Books, an activity of Encounter for Culture and Education, Inc., a nonprofit, tax exempt corporation. Encounter Books website address: www.encounterbooks.com Manufactured in the United States and printed on acid-free paper. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48‒1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). PAPERBACK EDITION ISBN 978-1-59403-522-7 THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS HAS CATALOGUED THE HARDCOVER EDITION AS FOLLOWS: Silverglate, Harvey A., 1942- Three felonies a day : how the feds target the innocent / by Harvey Silverglate. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-59403-255-4 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-59403-255-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Prosecution—United States. 2. Public prosecutors—United States. I. Title. KF9640.S578 2009 345.73’05042—dc22 2009006511 COntents Preface to the Paperback Edition . .xi Foreword by Alan M. Dershowitz . xxv Introduction: Traps and Snares for the Unwary Innocent . xxxiii 1. Reeling in the Great White, and Other Tales of Fishing for State and Local Pols ������������������������ï3 2. Giving Doctors Orders . 45 3. The Unhealthy Pursuit of Medical Device and Drug Companies . 75 4. Following (or Harassing?) the Money . 97 5. Accounting for the Perils Facing Business Support Services: The Late Arthur Andersen & Co. and Its Repercussions . 131 6. Lawyers: Government Offense Against the Best Defense . 159 7. Doing Their Duty (or Committing Espionage?) and Other Media Twilight Zones �����������������ï¿189 8. National Security: Protecting the Nation from Merchants, Artists, Professors, Students and Lobbyists for Non-Profits? . 217 Conclusion: For Whom the Bell Tolls . 255 Acknowledgments . 277 Endnotes . 285 Index. 319 To wife and partner Elsa Dorfman and son Isaac Dorfman Silverglate, who have lived with the often inconvenient consequences of my obsession with liberty during decades of a tumultuous career that continues unabated, and who have added enormously to my insights; and Alan Dershowitz, who first nurtured my interest in the criminal law and civil liberties when we arrived at Harvard Law School in 1964 (he as professor and I as student), and who has continued to nurture and support that interest over the decades; and Dorothy Rabinowitz, who has insisted that I have an obligation to write, in non-legalese English, about the lessons learned and still being learned from that career, and who pushed me relentlessly to complete this book. preface to the paperback edition Three Felonies a Day is the story of how citizens from all walks of life—doctors, accountants, businessmen, political activists, and oth- ers—have found themselves the targets of federal prosecutions, despite sensibly believing that they did nothing wrong, broke no laws, and harmed not a single person. In these wheels of injustice, vague laws are the lynchpin, functioning in very much the opposite way than origi- nally intended: they obscure, rather than clarify, the law’s demands. Since the hardcover version of this book was published, there has been considerable tumult in the arena of vague federal legislation used as a tyrannical trap for the unwary innocent. While some raised con- sciousness has become visible on civil society’s horizon, grave damage continues to be inflicted by out-of-control federal prosecutors.
Recommended publications
  • Dorchester's Favorite Restaurants
    Dorchester Reporter “The News and Values Around the Neighborhood” Volume 29 Issue 34 Thursday, August 23, 2012 50¢ Dorchester’s Favorite Restaurants From take-out pizza and steak tip-subs to cocktails and apps under the stars, Dorchester’s dining scene has taken on exciting new dimensions in recent years. The Reporter takes a look at some of the neighborhood’s stalwart eateries and hot new spots in our latest dining guide this week. The guide also features the results of our first-ever Reader’s Survey of Dorchester’s favorite restaurants. At left: Pat’s Pizza co-owner Pat Newell with employees Kleber Pintz, left and Vinnie Felix. Photo by Bill Forry Right: The Ledge in Lower Mills has become a favorite, in part, because of its fabulous outdoor patio. Photo by Mike Deehan New building, streetscape eyed for Mt. Vernon St. By gintautas duMcius UMass Boston, the John F. nEws Editor Kennedy Presidential Library Executives at Corcoran Jen- and Boston College High nison Companies are planning School, among other institu- the construction of a six-story tions. apartment building at the While no plans have been intersection of Mt. Vernon St. formally filed with City Hall, and Morrissey Boulevard. A Corcoran Jennison executives nonprofit funded by developer have been in discussions with is also in the conceptual stages the Boston Redevelopment of potentially remaking Mt. Authority, the city’s plan- Vernon St. through the expan- ning agency, and have made sion of sidewalks and creation a presentation about their of space for bicycles. ideas for Mt. Vernon St.
    [Show full text]
  • Open House Program
    Open House Agenda Monday, October 7, 2019 | 8:45 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. | North Gate Hall Twitter: @UCBSOJ | Instagram: @BerkeleyJournalism Hashtags: #UCBSOJ #BerkeleyJournalism Open House is designed for prospective students to attend as many of the day’s sessions as they wish, creating a day that best suits their needs. The expectation is that attendees will come and go from classes and information sessions as needed. Events (See Bios and Descriptions for more info) 8:45 am – 9:00 am Coffee & Refreshments (Courtyard) 10:00 am – 10:30 am Career Planning (Room B1) 10:30 am – 11:00 am Financial Planning (Room B1) 11:30 am – Noon Welcome Address by Dean Wasserman (Library) Noon – 1:00 pm Lunch (Courtyard) We’ll have themed lunch tables which you can join in order to learn more about different reporting areas. Table Reporting Themes: Audio | Democracy & Inequality | Documentary | Health, Science & Environment | Investigative | Multimedia | Narrative Writing | Photojournalism | Shortform Video 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm Investigative Reporting Program Talk (Library) 1:30 pm - 2:15 pm Chat with IRP (IRP Offices across the street, 2481 Hearst Avenue - Drop-In) 2:15 pm - 3:00 pm Chat with the Dean (Dean’s Office - Drop-In) 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm Student Panel: The Student Perspective (Library) 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm Reception with current students, faculty & staff Classes (See Bios and Descriptions for more info) 9:00 am – Noon Reporting the News J200 Sections: Democracy & Inequality Instructor: Chris Ballard | Production Lab Health & Environment Instructor: Elena Conis
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • The Hanging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor––Capital Punishment: Is the Death Penalty Worth the Price?
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 62 Issue 2 Article 9 2014 The Hanging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor––Capital Punishment: Is the Death Penalty Worth the Price? Beth D. Cohen Western New England University Law School Pat K. Newcombe Western New England University Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Beth D. Cohen and Pat K. Newcombe, The Hanging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor––Capital Punishment: Is the Death Penalty Worth the Price?, 62 Clev. St. L. Rev. 493 (2014) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol62/iss2/9 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEW: THE HANGING JUDGE BY MICHAEL A. PONSOR—CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: IS THE DEATH PENALTY WORTH THE PRICE? BETH D. COHEN* & PAT K. NEWCOMBE** The Boston Marathon bombings raised again the discussion of the death penalty in Massachusetts. Although Massachusetts currently has no death penalty, the federal government can prosecute capital cases in Massachusetts.1 In fact, U.S. prosecutors have decided to seek the death penalty in the case against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Boston Marathon bombing suspect.2 Previously, in 2000-2001, United States District Court Judge Michael A. Ponsor3 presided over the first death penalty case in Massachusetts in nearly 50 years, United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2004 Annual Report
    MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN FY 2004 Annual Report The Charles F. Hurley Building 19 Staniford St., 6th Floor Boston, MA 02114 Phone: 617-626-6520 Fax: 617-626-6530 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: www.mass.gov/women Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women Annual Report Fiscal Year 2004 DEDICATION Her Light Still Shines… “I believe in the power of government to make a better place for us to live. I believe that many problems in the public realm can be solved by the focused attention and hard work of capable, well-intentioned people working together. The potential for the state Commission on the Status of Women to have a positive impact in Massachusetts is enormous. I would be honored to work as a member on the issues and problems that affect all of us.” ~ Elaine F. Guiney 1946 - 2004 This annual report of the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women (MCSW) is dedicated to former Commissioner Elaine F. Guiney, who succumbed to an all too short battle with cancer on February 20th. Her passion for our mission, vision, guidance and involvement will be forever missed. Elaine wrote the quote above in her request for appointment to the MCSW by the Massachusetts Women’s Legislative Caucus. Elaine wanted to be appointed to enhance economic opportunities for women. She knew that in order to guarantee economic self-sufficiency for women, all opportunities needed to be available to them, including non-traditional jobs and self-employment. She knew that dealing with economic issues was key to improving the lives of women living within Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Nurse Newsletter :: April 2003
    April 2003 Inside… Single-payer health care: Why are we cutting Medicaid? ....2 President’s column: Where we are headed.................3 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION ■ www.massnurses.org ■ VOL. 74 NO. 3 MNA joins new coalition to save Hundreds gather to celebrate MNA’s 100th anniversary Worcester State Hospital.............3 More than 400 nurses from all corners of current crisis in nursing and patient safety MNA on Beacon Hill: the commonwealth took part in an historic in the state. Upon entering the hall, nurses Safe staffi ng & quality care..........4 three-part celebration on February 26 to mark were each given a single white carnation. The the 100th Anniversary of the Massachusetts carnations symbolized nurses’ commitment MNA on Beacon Hill ....................4 Nurses Association. The MNA, the largest to providing quality patient care, as well as and oldest association for registered nurses those nurses who have left the profession Capitol Hill Watch: in Massachusetts, used the occasion to honor because of untenable staffi ng conditions. Bush’s Medicare proposal ..........4 its past, celebrate its many accomplishments Higgins introduced the ceremony by and to point to present and future challenges saying, “Nurses are here to tell you that faced by the profession. while we are proud of our history and the Political Pulse: The event was kicked off with a special profession we have created to care for the Sen. Jarrett Barrios......................5 ceremony and demonstration in the Gard- public, you need to know that we are fi nd- registration for nurses. It was here that the ner Auditorium at the Massachusetts State ing it more diffi cult to meet the legal, ethical Safe staffi ng update ....................6 nurses made their case for the creation of an House.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hanging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor -- a Book Review
    Western New England University School of Law Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2014 The aH nging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor -- A Book Review: Capital Punishment -- Is the Death Penalty Worth the Price? Beth D. Cohen Western New England University School of Law, [email protected] Pat K. Newcombe Western New England University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/facschol Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Beth D. Cohen and Pat K. Newcombe, The aH nging Judge by Michael A. Ponsor -- A Book Review: Capital Punishment -- Is the Death Penalty Worth the Price?, 62 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 493 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEW: THE HANGING JUDGE BY MICHAELA. PONSOR--CAPITALPUNISHMENT: IS THE DEATH PENALTY WORTH THE PRICE? BETH D. COHEN* & PAT K. NEWCOMBE.. The Boston Marathon bombings raised again the discussion of the death penalty in Massachusetts. Although Massachusetts currently has no . death penalty, the federal government can prosecute capital cases in Massachusetts. 1 In fact, U.S. prosecutors have decided to seek the death penalty in the case against Dzhokhar Tsamaev, Boston Marathon bombing suspect.2 Previously, in 2000-2001, United States District Court Judge Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2018-2019 Shorenstein Center Annual Report
    Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Letter from the Director 2 2018–2019 Highlights 4 Areas of Focus Technology and Social Change Research Project 6 Misinformation Research 8 Digital Platforms and Democracy 10 News Quality Journalist’s Resource 12 The Goldsmith Awards 15 News Sustainability 18 Race & Equity 20 Events Annual Lectures 22 Theodore H. White Lecture on Press and Politics 23 Salant Lecture on Freedom of the Press 33 Speaker Series 41 The Student Experience 43 Fellows 45 Staff, Faculty, Board, and Supporters 47 From the Director Like the air we breathe and the water we drink, the information we consume sustains the health of the body politic. Good information nourishes democracy; bad information poisons it. The mission of the Shorenstein Center is to support and protect the information ecosystem. This means promoting access to reliable information through our work with journalists, policymakers, civil society, and scholars, while also slowing the spread of bad information, from hate speech to “fake news” to all kinds of distortion and media manipulation. The public square has always had to contend with liars, propagandists, dividers, and demagogues. But the tools for creating toxic information are more powerful and widely available than ever before, and the effects more dangerous. How our generation responds to threats we did not foresee, fueled by technologies we have not contained, is the central challenge of our age. How do journalists cover the impact of misinformation without spreading it further? How do technology companies,
    [Show full text]
  • HSCA Volume V: 9/28/78
    378 Obviously, the possibility cannot be dismissed, although it can hardly be said to have been established. At this point, it is, in your words, Mr. Chairman, perhaps only a little more than a "suspicion suspected," not a "fact found." The committee decided early in its investigation, as soon as it realized that a Mafia plot to assassinate the President warranted serious consideration, to assemble the most reliable information available on organized crime in the United States. The details of this phase of the committee's investigation will, of course, appear, hopefully in full, in its final report, a report that will consider the background of organized crime in America, the structure o£ the Mafia in the early 1960's, the effort by the Kennedy administration to suppress the mob, and the evidence that the assassination might have been undertaken in retaliation for those efforts. To scrutinize the possible role of organized crime in the assassi- nation, the committee early brought on one of the country's lead- ing experts on the subject. He is Ralph Salerno, whose career as an organized crime investigator with the New York City Police De- partment goes back to 1946. Mr. Salerno has since retired from the New York City Police Department and I would note that on the day of his retirement, the New York Times was moved to comment that he perhaps knew more about the Mafia than any nonmember in the United States. It would be appropriate at this time, Mr. Chairman, to call Ralph Salerno. Chairman STOKES . The committee calls Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Investigative Journalism Matters
    Credits © 2015 by The Boston Globe All rights reserved under the Pan-American and International Copyright Conventions. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system now known or hereafter in- vented, without written permission from the publisher. 1 Spotlight is launched On September 27, 1970, The Boston Globe announced in the newspaper the creation of a “special, three-man investigative team” that would provide deeper coverage on the stories driving the discus- sions of the day. The team was modeled after the “Insight” team that worked at the Sunday Times of London, which had gained recognition as a leading investigative newspaper authority. The Globe’s announcement got straight to the point for its readers. “The team’s mission will be to reconstruct major news events as rapidly and comprehensively as possible, with an emphasis on the ‘why’ rather than the ‘what’ of an event. The unit will also seek to expose public corruption and malfeasance. Articles by the team will appear under the signature of “Spotlight.” Almost a half-century later, that mission endures, as Spotlight remains the oldest, continuously op- erating investigative unit at a newspaper in the United States. With its aggressive coverage of the Catholic church, the healthcare industry, the shady world of taxicabs, and the unregulated college housing crisis, to name a few examples, the Spotlight team embodies investigative journalism at its best. Spotlight gives a voice to the voiceless, by shining a light into corners of our society that demand accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press
    WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO I see powerful echoes of what I personally experienced as Director of NSA and CIA. I only wish I had access to this fully developed intellectual framework and the courses of action it suggests while still in government. —General Michael V. Hayden (retired) Former Director of the CIA Director of the NSA e problem of secrecy is double edged and places key institutions and values of our democracy into collision. On the one hand, our country operates under a broad consensus that secrecy is antithetical to democratic rule and can encourage a variety of political deformations. But the obvious pitfalls are not the end of the story. A long list of abuses notwithstanding, secrecy, like openness, remains an essential prerequisite of self-governance. Ross’s study is a welcome and timely addition to the small body of literature examining this important subject. —Gabriel Schoenfeld Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Author of Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law (W.W. Norton, May 2010). ? ? The topic of unauthorized disclosures continues to receive significant attention at the highest levels of government. In his book, Mr. Ross does an excellent job identifying the categories of harm to the intelligence community associated NI PRESS ROSS GARY with these disclosures. A detailed framework for addressing the issue is also proposed. This book is a must read for those concerned about the implications of unauthorized disclosures to U.S. national security. —William A. Parquette Foreign Denial and Deception Committee National Intelligence Council Gary Ross has pulled together in this splendid book all the raw material needed to spark a fresh discussion between the government and the media on how to function under our unique system of government in this ever-evolving information-rich environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Clemens* Journalists Face a Credibility Crisis, Plagued by Chants
    FROM FAIRNESS TO FAKE NEWS: HOW REGULATIONS CAN RESTORE PUBLIC TRUST IN THE MEDIA Sarah Clemens* Journalists face a credibility crisis, plagued by chants of fake news and a crowded rat race in the primetime ratings. Critics of the media look at journalists as the problem. Within this domain, legal scholarship has generated a plethora of pieces critiquing media credibility with less attention devoted to how and why public trust of the media has eroded. This Note offers a novel explanation and defense. To do so, it asserts the proposition that deregulating the media contributed to the proliferation of fake news and led to a decline in public trust of the media. To support this claim, this Note first briefly examines the historical underpinnings of the regulations that once made television broadcasters “public trustees” of the news. This Note also touches on the historical role of the Public Broadcasting Act that will serve as the legislative mechanism under which media regulations can be amended. Delving into what transpired as a result of deregulation and prodding the effects of limiting oversight over broadcast, this Note analyzes the current public perception of broadcast news, putting forth the hypothesis that deregulation is correlated to a negative public perception of broadcast news. This Note analyzes the effect of deregulation by exploring recent examples of what has emerged as a result of deregulation, including some of the most significant examples of misinformation in recent years. In so doing, it discusses reporting errors that occurred ahead of the Iraq War, analyzes how conspiracy theories spread in mainstream broadcast, and discusses the effect of partisan reporting on public perception of the media.
    [Show full text]