And Related Phylogenetic Analyses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. -
Modular Structure, Sequence Diversification and Appropriate
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Modular structure, sequence diversifcation and appropriate nomenclature of seroins produced Received: 17 July 2018 Accepted: 14 February 2019 in the silk glands of Lepidoptera Published: xx xx xxxx Lucie Kucerova1, Michal Zurovec 1,2, Barbara Kludkiewicz1, Miluse Hradilova3, Hynek Strnad3 & Frantisek Sehnal1,2 Seroins are small lepidopteran silk proteins known to possess antimicrobial activities. Several seroin paralogs and isoforms were identifed in studied lepidopteran species and their classifcation required detailed phylogenetic analysis based on complete and verifed cDNA sequences. We sequenced silk gland-specifc cDNA libraries from ten species and identifed 52 novel seroin cDNAs. The results of this targeted research, combined with data retrieved from available databases, form a dataset representing the major clades of Lepidoptera. The analysis of deduced seroin proteins distinguished three seroin classes (sn1-sn3), which are composed of modules: A (includes the signal peptide), B (rich in charged amino acids) and C (highly variable linker containing proline). The similarities within and between the classes were 31–50% and 22.5–25%, respectively. All species express one, and in exceptional cases two, genes per class, and alternative splicing further enhances seroin diversity. Seroins occur in long versions with the full set of modules (AB1C1B2C2B3) and/or in short versions that lack parts or the entire B and C modules. The classes and the modular structure of seroins probably evolved prior to the split between Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. The diversity of seroins is refected in proposed nomenclature. Te silk spun by caterpillars is a composite material based on two protein agglomerates that have been known for centuries as fbroin and sericin. -
Towards a Mitogenomic Phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 169–178 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Towards a mitogenomic phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N. Timmermans a,b, , David C. Lees c, Thomas J. Simonsen a a Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom b Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom c Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Downing Street CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: The backbone phylogeny of Lepidoptera remains unresolved, despite strenuous recent morphological and Received 13 January 2014 molecular efforts. Molecular studies have focused on nuclear protein coding genes, sometimes adding a Revised 11 May 2014 single mitochondrial gene. Recent advances in sequencing technology have, however, made acquisition of Accepted 26 May 2014 entire mitochondrial genomes both practical and economically viable. Prior phylogenetic studies utilised Available online 6 June 2014 just eight of 43 currently recognised lepidopteran superfamilies. Here, we add 23 full and six partial mitochondrial genomes (comprising 22 superfamilies of which 16 are newly represented) to those Keywords: publically available for a total of 24 superfamilies and ask whether such a sample can resolve deeper tRNA rearrangement lepidopteran phylogeny. Using recoded datasets we obtain topologies that are highly congruent with Ditrysia Illumina prior nuclear and/or morphological studies. Our study shows support for an expanded Obtectomera LR-PCR including Gelechioidea, Thyridoidea, plume moths (Alucitoidea and Pterophoroidea; possibly along with Pooled mitochondrial genome assembly Epermenioidea), Papilionoidea, Pyraloidea, Mimallonoidea and Macroheterocera. -
Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera
EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution. -
02 October 2015 Radebeul-Germany
©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.soceurlep.eu/ und www.zobodat.at XIXth European Congress Welcome .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 of Lepidopterology Programme ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 27 September – 02 October 2015 Monday, 28 September 2015 ........................................................................................................ 5 Radebeul · Germany Tuesday, 29 September 2015 ....................................................................................................... 7 Wednesday, 30 September 2015 ................................................................................................ 9 Thursday, 1 October 2015 ............................................................................................................ 10 Friday, 2 October 2015 ................................................................................................................... 14 Honouring Niels Peder Kristensen ............................................................................................... 15 Abstracts .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Oral presentations .......................................................................................................................... -
MOTHS of WESTERN NORTH AMERICA UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd 30/1/09 7:24 Am Page Ii UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd
UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page i UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd MOTHS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page ii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd This page intentionally left blank UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page iii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd Moths of Western North America JERRY A. POWELL PAUL A. OPLER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 1/30/09 9:03 PM Page iv Aptara University of California Press, one of the most distinguished univer- Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data sity presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural Powell, Jerry A. sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and Moths of western North America / Jerry A. Powell, Paul A. Opler. by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For p. cm. more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-25197-7 (case : alk. paper) 1. Moths—West (U.S.) University of California Press 2. Moths—Northwest, Canadian. I. Opler, Paul A. II. Title. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California QL548.P69 2009 595.780970—dc22 University of California Press, Ltd. 2008048605 London, England Manufactured in China. © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 10987654321 Photo/image credits: T. Arcand: 61.25–61.27, 61.31, 61.34, 62.10, 62.20, 62.23, 62.24, 63.12, 63.31, 63.36, 64.1, 64.24–64.26, 64.29. -
Comprehensive Gene and Taxon Coverage Elucidates Radiation
Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 2, 2016 Proc. R. Soc. B (2010) 277, 2839–2848 doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0392 Published online 5 May 2010 Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies Marko Mutanen1,*, Niklas Wahlberg2 and Lauri Kaila3 1Zoological Museum, Department of Biology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, Oulu 90014, Finland 2Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland 3Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, PO Box 17, Helsinki 00014, Finland Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) represent one of the most diverse animals groups. Yet, the phylogeny of advanced ditrysian Lepidoptera, accounting for about 99 per cent of lepidopteran species, has remained largely unresolved. We report a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of lepidopteran affinities. We performed phylogenetic analyses of 350 taxa representing nearly 90 per cent of lepidopteran families. We found Ditrysia to be a monophyletic taxon with the clade Tischerioidea þ Palaephatoidea being the sister group of it. No support for the monophyly of the proposed major internested ditrysian clades, Apo- ditrysia, Obtectomera and Macrolepidoptera, was found as currently defined, but each of these is supported with some modification. The monophyly or near-monophyly of most previously identified lepi- dopteran superfamilies is reinforced, but several species-rich superfamilies were found to be para- or polyphyletic. Butterflies were found to be more closely related to ‘microlepidopteran’ groups of moths rather than the clade Macrolepidoptera, where they have traditionally been placed. There is support for the monophyly of Macrolepidoptera when butterflies and Calliduloidea are excluded. -
Phylogenomics Reveals the Evolutionary Timing and Pattern of Butterflies and Moths
Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths Akito Y. Kawaharaa,1, David Plotkina,b, Marianne Espelanda,c, Karen Meusemannd,e,f, Emmanuel F. A. Toussainta,g, Alexander Donathe, France Gimniche, Paul B. Frandsenh,i, Andreas Zwickf, Mario dos Reisj, Jesse R. Barberk, Ralph S. Petersc, Shanlin Liul,m, Xin Zhoum, Christoph Mayere, Lars Podsiadlowskie, Caroline Storera, Jayne E. Yackn, Bernhard Misofe, and Jesse W. Breinholta,o,2 aMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; bEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cArthropoda Department, Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Museum, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; dDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Museum, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, National Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, 1208 Geneva, Switzerland; hPlant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602; iData Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20002; jSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom; kDepartment of Biological -
Lepidoptera of Canada 463 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 463–505 (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada 463 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Lepidoptera of Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Jean-François Landry2, B. Chris Schmidt2, Jeremy R. deWaard3 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 – 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 3 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada Corresponding author: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 6 June 2018 | Accepted 20 August 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/D18E9BBE-EB97-4528-B312-70C3AA9C3FD8 Citation: Pohl GR, Landry J-F, Schmidt BC, deWaard JR (2019) Lepidoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 463–505. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.27259 Abstract The known Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) of the provinces and territories of Canada are summarised, and current knowledge is compared to the state of knowledge in 1979. A total of 5405 species are known to occur in Canada in 81 families, and a further 50 species have been reported but are unconfirmed. This represents an increase of 1348 species since 1979. The DNA barcodes available for Canadian Lepidoptera are also tabulated, based on a dataset of 148,314 specimens corresponding to 5842 distinct clusters. -
Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.-Q
Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758 (4 suborders) (15,578 genera, 157,424 species, 50/86) 123 úUnassigned early lepidopterans (4 families) úFamily unassigned (12 genera, 16 species, 12/16) ú Family Archaeolepidae Whalley, 1985 (1 genus, 1 species, 1/1) ú Family Mesokristenseniidae Huang, Nel & Minet, 2010 (1 genus, 3 species, 1/3) ú Family Eolepidopterigidae Rasnitsyn, 1983 (1 genus, 1 species, 1/1) ú Family Undopterigidae Kozlov, 1988 (1 genus, 1 species, 1/1) Suborder Zeugloptera Chapman, 1917 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Micropterigoidea Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 (1 family) Family Micropterigidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 (21 genera, 160 species, 3/6) 9 Suborder Aglossata Speidel, 1977 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Agathiphagoidea Kristensen, 1967 (1 family) Family Agathiphagidae Kristensen, 1967 (1 genus, 2 species) Suborder Heterobathmiina Kristensen & Nielsen, 1983 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Heterobathmioidea Kristensen & Nielsen, 1979 (1 family) Family Heterobathmiidae Kristensen & Nielsen, 1979 (1 genus, 3 species) Suborder Glossata Fabricius, 1775 (6 infraorders, all following) Infraorder Dacnonypha Hinton, 1946 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Eriocranioidea Rebel, 1901 (1 family) Family Eriocraniidae Rebel, 1901 (5 genera, 29 species, 0/1) Clade Coelolepida Nielsen & Kristensen, 1996 (5 infraorders, all following) 10 Infraorder Acanthoctesia Minet, 2002 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Acanthopteroctetoidea Davis, 1978 (1 family) Family Acanthopteroctetidae Davis, 1978 (2 genera, 5 species) Infraorder Lophocoronina Common, 1990 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Lophocoronoidea Common, 1973 (1 family) Family Lophocoronidae Common, 1973 (1 genus, 6 species) Clade Myoglossata Kristensen & Nielsen, 1981 (3 infraorders, all following) Infraorder Neopseustina Davis & Nielsen, 1980 (1 superfamily) Superfamily Neopseustoidea Hering, 1925 (1 family) Family Neopseustidae Hering, 1925 (4 genera, 14 species) Clade Neolepidoptera Packard, 1895 (2 infraorders, all following) 1. -
2015-2016 to Gauge the Growth in Our Institution Over the Past Century
From the Director “On the whole we have here in Florida, here in Gainesville, the opportunity, waiting at our door, to build up one of the greatest museums the world has known.” With these words in our first annual report (1915), Founding Museum Director Thompson Van Hyning shared his outlook with UF President A.A. Murphree. Van Hyning continued, “I would recommend that there be introduced in the next Legislature a bill to establish a State Museum under the auspices of the State University, at Gainesville; that the act of establishing the same shall create a natural history and archaeological survey of the State.” Two years later in May 1917, while World War I raged in Europe, the Florida Legislature acted upon this bill and the Florida State Museum was created. Now after a century we find ourselves looking ahead to 2017 and our centennial celebration as Florida’s state museum of natural history. Many exciting events are planned to mark this historic occasion. We will host a Gala Weekend in April; celebrate our 100th anniversary on May 30; dedicate our new Beverly and Jon Thompson Discovery Zone geared toward our youngest visitors in July; open a special centennial exhibition - Rare Beautiful & Fascinating: 100 Years @FloridaMuseum; award another Archie Carr Medal; host special events throughout the year; and publish a book with the University Press of Florida highlighting some of the Museum’s most significant objects and outlining its history. However, in anticipation of these events, it might be well to pause and reflect on Van Hyning’s century-old dream of creating a state museum which is also one of the great museums of the world. -
Phylogeny and Feeding Trait Evolution of the Mega-Diverse Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Obtectomera): New Insight from 19 Nuclear Genes
Systematic Entomology (2016), 41,112–132 DOI:10.1111/syen.12143 Phylogeny and feeding trait evolution of the mega-diverse Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Obtectomera): new insight from 19 nuclear genes JAE-CHEON SOHN1,2,3,JEROMEC.REGIER1,CHARLES MITTER1,DAVIDADAMSKI2,JEAN-FRANÇOISLANDRY4, MARIA HEIKKILÄ2,3,KYU-TEKPARK5,TERRYHARRISON6, KIM MITTER1,ANDREASZWICK7,AKITOY.KAWAHARA8, SOOWON CHO9,MICHAELP.CUMMINGS10 and PATRIC SCHMITZ11 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A., 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 4Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, C.E.F., Ottawa, Canada, 5National Academy of Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, U.S.A., 7Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO Ecosystem Science, Canberra, Australia, 8Florida Museum of Natural History/McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A., 9Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea, 10Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A. and 11PEPS, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A. Abstract. The Gelechioidea (>18 000 species), one of the largest superfamilies of Lepidoptera, are a major element of terrestrial ecosystems and include important pests and biological model species. Despite much recent progress, our understanding of the classi!cation, phylogeny and evolution of Gelechioidea remains limited. Building on recent molecular studies of this superfamily and a recently revised family/subfamily classi!cation, we provide an independent estimate of among-family relationships, with little overlap in gene sample.