DOCSLIB.ORG

Highlights from the Green Lane: a Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highlights from the Green Lane: a Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities Portland State University PDXScholar Transportation Research and Education Center TREC Friday Seminar Series (TREC) 5-2-2014 Highlights from the Green Lane: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities Christopher Monsere Portland State University, [email protected] Jennifer Dill Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/trec_seminar Part of the Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Monsere, Christopher and Dill, Jennifer, "Highlights from the Green Lane: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities" (2014). TREC Friday Seminar Series. 38. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/trec_seminar/38 This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in TREC Friday Seminar Series by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Highlights from the Green Lane: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Protected Cycling Facilities Christopher M. Monsere, Jennifer Dill Kelly Cli5on, Nathan McNeil, Nick Foster, Tara Goddard Portland State University PSU Friday Transportation Seminar May 2, 2014 1 Photo credit: Nathan McNeil, PSU Research Objectives • A field-based evaluation of protected bikeways in five U.S. cities to study: – Safety of users (both perceived and actual) – Effectiveness of the design – Perceptions of residents and other road users – Attractiveness to more casual cyclists – Change in economic activity 2 Dearborn Street - Milwaukee Avenue One-way protected lane on both sides on a two- Two-way protected lane on one-way street Chicago, IL - Chicago, IL way street L Street – Multnomah Street One-way protected lane on both sides on a two- One-way protected lane on a one-way street Washington, DC – Portland, OR way street Rio Grande Street - Oak/Fell Streets – Couplet of one-way protected lanes on one-way Two-way protected lane on one-way street AusOn, TX San Francisco, CA streets Barton Springs One-way protected lane on the south side of the Bluebonnet Lane – Two-way protected lane on a two-way street Road – AusOn, TX road (other direcon is shared use path) AusOn, TX Data Collected • Resident Surveys – 9,617 surveys mailed – 2,283 returned (34% used online option) – 24% response rate • Bicyclist Surveys – 3,409 bicyclists intercepted – 1,111 surveys completed – 33% response rate • Video Recorded at Intersections – 16 locations in 4 cities – 204 hours analyzed – 21,728 bicyclists and 23,347 turning vehicles observed 5 Resident Bicyclist Four year degree + Four year degree83% + 89% Income >$100k 41% Income >$100k 48% Work From Home 15% Work From Home 7% Work Outside Home Work Outside66% Home 93% Asian 6% Asian 7% Hispanic or Latino/a 5% Hispanic or Latino/a 5% Black 5% Black 1% White 81%White 89% 55 + years 34% 55 + years 6% 35 to 54 years 40% 35 to 54 years 37% <35 years of age 26% <35 years of age 56% Female 53% Female 32% Own working bicycle Own working67% bicycle Own/Lease a car Own/Lease81% a car 73% Car Share Membership 18% Car Share Membership 28% Transit Pass 50% Transit Pass 72% Driver's License Driver's License96% 97% Children in HH 15% Children in HH 25% 2+ Adults in HH 2+64% Adults in HH 78% Home Owners 55%Home Owners 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 6 Source: Resident and Bicyclist surveys, Green Lane evaluation Residents by Primary Commute Mode Non-commuter Mix Transit Bicycle Foot Car / Truck 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 7 Source: Resident surveys, Green Lane evaluation Today… 1. Did the number of people bicycling change? 2. How well do the designs work? 3. Do the lane improve people’s perceptions of safety? 4. What do residents think about the lanes? 5. How attractive are the lanes for less comfortable cyclists? 8 1. Did the number of people bicycling change? 9 Change in Observed Bicycle Volumes 180% 171% 160% 140% 126% 120% 100% 80% 68% 65% Percent Increase 60% 46% 46% 40% 36% 21% 20% 0% Rio Grande Multnomah Bluebonnet Fell Milwaukee Dearborn L Street Barton Springs Bike Lanes Prior No Bike Lanes Prior 10 Source: City-provided before and after counts, PSU video counts, ACS Survey Before the new facility was built, how would you have made this trip? 90% Would not have taken trip 80% 70% 21% By other mode 60% By bicycle, using another route 50% 40% 7% 10% 10% 6% 30% 60% 20% 38% 6% 34% 32% 29% 7% 10% 10% 18% 11% 6% 0% Dearborn Rio Grande Multnomah L Street Barton Oak Street Fell Street Milwaukee Springs 11 Source: Cyclist intercept surveys, Green Lane evaluation 2. How well do the designs work? 12 Design Elements Evaluated • Intersections – Mixing zones – Fully signalized • Providing curb access – Loading zone – Transit stops • Other design elements – Width – Green pavement marking – Minor driveways 13 Mixing Zone Designs NACTO-Style Yield Shark Tooth Flexpost Delimited Mixing Zone Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike Lane Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike Lane (ABL) (ABL) Photo from survey (shown): Multnomah and Photo from survey (shown): L Street Photo from survey (shown): Oak St. and Divisadero St. NE 9th, Video Locaon(s): Multnomah and NE Video Locaon(s): L Street/ 15th Street, L Street/ Video Locaon(s): Oak St. and Divisadero St. 9th ConnecJcut Mixing zone w/ green-back Mixing Zone with Full Green Skip Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike Lane sharrow mixing zone Marking (ABL) Photo from survey (shown): Oak St. and Photo from survey (shown): Fell St. and Broderick Photo from survey (shown): Fell St. and Divisadero St. Broderick St. Video Locaon(s): Oak St. and St. Video Locaon(s): No video Broderick St Video Locaon(s): Fell St. and Baker 14 Total Video Observations Connecticut Avenue 15th Street Turning/Merging Motor DC Vehicles Btwn 19th St / 18th St (Hotel) Bicyclists Divisadero Street SF Broderick Street Baker Street 11th Street (Transit Stop) PDX 11th Street (intersection) 9th Street 7th Street Grand Avenue Elston Avenue CHI Desplaines Street Randolph Street Madison Street Congress Parkway 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Number Observed (6 hours) 15 Survey Video Survey Video Correctly Identified Location Correct Lane Use Percent Percent Mixing Zone Design Strongly Calculated Agreeing Strongly Conflict Bicycle Agreeing Bicyclists Thorough Turning Turning Through Agreeing Rates Turning They Feel “Understand” Bicycles Motorist Motorist Bicyclist Vehicles Right Safe Yield Flexpost Delimited Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike 85% - - - 87% 91% 17% 64% 0.16 Lane (ABL): L Street NACTO-Style Yield Shark Tooth Mixing Zone: 63% 51% 98% 79% 93% 63% 14% 73% 0.37 Multnomah/ 9th Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike Lane (ABL): Oak/ 75% 94% 73% 92% 66% 81% 19% 74% 0.12 Divisadero Mixing Zone with Advisory Bike Lane (ABL): Fell/ 81% 93% 74% 97% - - 15% 72% - Divisadero Mixing zone w/ green- back sharrow mixing 71% 79% 97% 95% 48% 30% 15% 79% 0.44 zone: Oak/Broderick Mixing Zone with Full Green Skip Marking: Fell/ 74% 73% 96% 95% 49% - 22% 84% 0.13 Broderick or Fell/Baker 16 Dearborn and Madison, Chicago, IL Photo: C. Monsere 17 Bicycle Signals on Dearborn • Using the small bicycle in the bicycle signal lens is a good way to communicate the signal is only for bicycles – 87% agree • I like that bicyclists and turning cars each have their own signal – 74% agree • At these intersections, it is always clear to me which signal I should use as a motorist – 66% agree 18 People on Bicycles Waited for green/legal right-turn on red Proceeded illegally on red Dearborn/ Randolph 92% 8% Dearborn/ Madison 77% 23% Dearborn/ Congress 93% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% People in Motor Vehicles Legal Turn on Green Illegal Turn on Red Arrow Jumped into crosswalk Dearborn/ Randolph 92% 6% 2% Dearborn/ Madison 90% 5% 6% Dearborn/ Congress 84% 10% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 19 3. Do the lanes improve users’ perception of safety? 20 Because of the protected bike lanes, the safety of _____ on the street has . 37% Walking Portland, Multnomah 45% 74% Driving 21% San Francisco, Oak 38% 80% Bicycling 52% Austin, Bluebonnet 38% 85% 44% Austin, Barton Springs 43% 82% 19% Chicago, Milwaukee 28% 74% 15% Chicago, Dearborn 23% 76% 27% Washington DC - L St. 30% 80% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of Residents Stating “Safety Increased" 21 Source: Resident Surveys, Green Lane evaluation I feel the safety of bicycling on ______ has . Increased Somewhat Increased a Lot Austin Rio Grande 27% 66% SF Oak / Fell 18% 81% Portland Multnomah 33% 59% Chicago Milwuakie 31% 65% DC L Street 29% 66% Chicago Dearborn 18% 82% Austin Barton Springs 33% 56% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 22 Source: Cyclist intercept surveys, Green Lane evaluation Buffer type affects safety and comfort Types of buffers used include: Flexposts and painted buffer Parked vehicles and Semi-permanent planter with (Fell Street, San Francisco) flexposts colored pavement (Milwaukee Avenue, (Multnomah St., Portland) Chicago) 23 The buffer section with ______ between the traffic lanes and the bikeway makes me feel safe. Paint, One-way Two-way Paint, One-way One-way Flexposts, One-way Flexposts, One-way Flexposts, One-way Flexposts, One-way Flexposts, Two-way Planters, One-way Flexposts, Two-way Parked Cars, One-way Flexposts, One-way Parked Cars, Two-way Curb, Grass (Path), Seperated Path 1 2 3 4 Mean Score 24 Source: Cyclist intercept surveys, Green Lane evaluation …buffer makes me feel safe 3.80 (shared-use path) 3.70 3.60 3.50 3.40 3.30 Mean Score 3.20 3.10 3.00 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 Tot al Widt h (ft) Far Edge of Bicycle Facility to Near Edge of Motor Vehicle Lane 25 Buffer comfort Very Uncomfortable (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Very Comfortable (6) With planters separating the bikeway With a 2-3 foot buffer and plastic flexposts With a raised concrete curb With a painted buffer and parked cars With a painted 2-3 foot buffer With a solid painted buffer 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 26 Source: Cyclist intercept surveys, Green Lane evaluation 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Written Comments
    Written Comments 1 2 3 4 1027 S. Lusk Street Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] 208.429.6520 www.boisebicycleproject.org ACHD, March, 2016 The Board of Directors of the Boise Bicycle Project (BBP) commends the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for its efforts to study and solicit input on implementation of protected bike lanes on Main and Idaho Streets in downtown Boise. BBP’s mission includes the overall goal of promoting the personal, social and environmental benefits of bicycling, which we strive to achieve by providing education and access to affordable refurbished bicycles to members of the community. Since its establishment in 2007, BBP has donated or recycled thousands of bicycles and has provided countless individuals with bicycle repair and safety skills each year. BBP fully supports efforts to improve the bicycle safety and accessibility of downtown Boise for the broadest segment of the community. Among the alternatives proposed in ACHD’s solicitation, the Board of Directors of BBP recommends that the ACHD pursue the second alternative – Bike Lanes Protected by Parking on Main Street and Idaho Street. We also recommend that there be no motor vehicle parking near intersections to improve visibility and limit the risk of the motor vehicles turning into bicyclists in the protected lane. The space freed up near intersections could be used to provide bicycle parking facilities between the bike lane and the travel lane, which would help achieve the goal of reducing sidewalk congestion without compromising safety. In other communities where protected bike lanes have been implemented, this alternative – bike lanes protected by parking – has proven to provide the level of comfort necessary to allow bicycling in downtown areas by families and others who would not ride in traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes
    Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes http://bit.ly/nitc_583 Christopher M. Monsere @CMonsere Jennifer Dill @JenniferDillPSU Nathan McNeil @NWUrban Portland State University Pro Walk Pro Bike Pro Place Pittsburgh, PA September 9, 2014 1 Photo credit: Nathan McNeil, PSU Session Overview 1. Overview of Sites (Chris) 10 2. Methodology (Nathan) 5 3. Change in Ridership (Jennifer) 15 *Questions from audience* 4. Design (Chris) 25 *Questions from audience* 6. Barrier types (Nathan) 5 7. Community Support (Jennifer) 10 *Questions from audience* 2 Research Objectives • A field-based evaluation of protected bikeways in five U.S. cities to study: – Safety of users (both perceived and actual) – Effectiveness of the design – Perceptions of residents and other road users – Attractiveness to more casual cyclists – Change in economic activity 3 Overview of Sites 4 Green Lane Cities Studied 5 Study Facilities: Austin Rio Grande Street Bluebonnet Lane Barton Springs Road 6 Study Facilities: Chicago Chicago: N/S Dearborn Street Chicago: N Milwaukee Avenue 7 Study Facilities: Portland Portland: NE Multnomah Street 8 Study Facilities: San Francisco SF: Fell Street SF: Oak Street 9 Study Facilities: Washington DC DC: L Street 10 Methodology 11 Video Data • Primarily intersections • 3 locations per facility, 2 cameras per location • 2 days of video (7am to 7pm) per location • 168 hours analyzed • 16,393 bicyclists and 19,724 turning vehicles observed Example Video Screenshots (2 views) from San Francisco at Oak and Broderick Resident
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes the Borough Council
    Green Lane Borough Green Lane, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Borough Council Meeting June 10, 2021 Minutes The Borough Council met on the above date in the Pavilion of the Isaac Smith Park to allow for social distancing due to the COVID-19 virus pandemic. Signage was posted at the Borough Office and on the Borough’s website to advise people that the meeting was being held in the Pavilion. Borough Council waited five minutes past the 7 p.m. starting time to allow people to walk from Borough office to the Pavilion. The meeting was called to order by President Brian Carpenter at 7:05 p.m., and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: President Brian Carpenter and Vice President Gerald Godshall and Council Members Jack Findley, and Jonathan Guntz. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Darren Landis. OTHER OFFICIALS PRESENT: Mayor Lynn Wolfe, Solicitor Dave Comer, Secretary/Treasurer Mary T. Garber, Code Enforcement/Zoning Officer John Membrino. OFFICIALS ABSENT: Engineer Joe Carlin. MOTION ON MINUTES: A motion was made by Gerald Godshall to accept the minutes of the May 13, 2021, Council meeting. Seconded by Jack Findley. Motion passed. MAYOR’S REPORT: • Mayor Wolfe reported on the Radiological Emergency Response Training & Tabletop Exercise that was held at the Marlborough Township Municipal Building on Thursday, May 20, 2021. The Mayor, Council Member Jack Findley, Borough Secretary Mary T. Garber, Fire Company Chief Ryan Crouthamel and Fire Police Captain Scott Bergey participated in the training in preparation for the Limerick Generating Station drill on November 16, 2021. • The Mayor thanked the adornment committee members, and Council Members Jack Findley and Gerald Godshall for doing such a great job keeping the park looking nice this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITIES FINAL REPORT Lessons from the Green Lanes: Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes in the U.S. NITC-RR-583 June 2014 A University Transportation Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation LESSONS FROM THE GREEN LANES: EVALUATING PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN THE U.S. FINAL REPORT NITC-RR-583 Portland State University Alta Planning Independent Consultant June 2014 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITC-RR-583 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Lessons From The Green Lanes: June 2014 Evaluating Protected Bike Lanes In The U.S. 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Chris Monsere, Jennifer Dill, Nathan McNeil, Kelly Clifton, Nick Foster, Tara Goddard, Matt Berkow, Joe Gilpin, Kim Voros, Drusilla van Hengel, Jamie Parks 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Chris Monsere Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 11. Contract or Grant No. NITC-RR-583 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) Final Report P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report presents finding from research evaluating U.S. protected bicycle lanes (cycle tracks) in terms of their use, perception, benefits, and impacts. This research examines protected bicycle lanes in five cities: Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Portland, OR; San Francisco, CA; and Washington, D.C., using video, surveys of intercepted bicyclists and nearby residents, and count data.
    [Show full text]
  • £220,000 272 Green Lane Road, Leicester, LE5
    Estate Agents Lettings Valuers Mortgages 272 Green Lane Road, Leicester, LE5 4PB • Recently Refurbished Family Home • No Upward Chain • Newly Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom • Off-Road Parking • Gas Central Heating & Double • Early Viewing Recommended A newly refurbished established home situated in this sought-after location. The well planned accommodation briefly comprises entrance hall, lounge and newly fitted kitchen/dining room, three first floor bedrooms and newly fitted bathroom. This lovely home stands with off-road parking to front, lawned gardens to rear and benefits from a full gas heating system and UPVC double glazing throughout. An internal inspection is highly recommended to appreciate the calibre of this home which is being sold with NO UPWARD CHAIN. EPC D. £220,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: FRONT LOUNGE The sought-after suburb of North Evington is 12'2 x 11'5 (3.71m x 3.48m) located to the east of the City of Leicester and With UPVC sealed unit double glazed circular is well known for its popularity in terms of bay window to front elevation, new laminate convenience for ease of access to the Leicester wood effect flooring and central heating City centre and all the excellent amenities radiator. therein, and the Ring Road which links North Evington and the adjacent suburbs of Oadby and Stoneygate to Junction 21 of the M1\M69 motorway network for travel north, south and west, and the adjoining Fosse Park and Meridian shopping, entertainment, retail and business centres. North Evington also offers access to the nearby General Hospital, as well as many of the City's major employers and a good range of local neighbourhood amenities including shopping for day-to-day needs along Green Lane Road, East Park Road, Evington Road and Uppingham Road, schooling for all ages, RE-FITTED KITCHEN\DINING ROOM recreational amenities and regular bus services 14'9 x 12'2 (4.50m x 3.71m) to the Leicester City centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Report
    abc Public report Report to 21 st August 2014 Planning Committee Report of Executive Director for Place Title Petition – Request for the City Council to take action against the closure of the footpath adjacent to 7a Rowleys Green Lane 1. Purpose of the report 1.1 A petition with 27 signatures has been presented by Councillor Harvard to request that the City Council take action regarding the closure of the footpath adjacent to 7a Rowleys Green Lane. In accordance with the City Council's procedure for dealing with petitions, those relating to rights of way are heard by the Planning Committee. 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Planning Committee is recommended to: (a) agree that it can be reasonably alleged that the footpath has been dedicated as a highway on the basis of the evidence currently available; (b) subject to the approval of recommendation (a) above, to approve the use of Highways Act 1980 S143 to serve notice on the landowner to remove all obstructions and re-open the footpath; (c) approve the making of a modification order to add the footpath between Rowleys Green Lane and footpath B23 in Warwickshire to the City of Coventry (Former County Borough) Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way. 3. Background 3.1 A petition presented by Councillor Harvard has been received by the City Council containing 27 signatures requesting that:- Petition against the closure of the B23 footpath at Rowleys Green Lane, Longford, Coventry. 1 It is important to clarify that the B23 footpath is actually in Warwickshire and finishes at the City boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lane Footpath Improvement Scheme
    STOCKPORT COUNCIL EXECUTIVE REPORT – SUMMARY SHEET Subject: Green Lane Footpath Improvement Scheme Report to: (a) Heatons & Reddish Area Committee Date: Monday, 21 June 2021 Report of: (b) Corporate Director for Place Management & Regeneration Key Decision: (c) NO / YES (Please circle) Forward Plan General Exception Special Urgency (Tick box) Summary: To report the findings of a consultation exercise for the Green Lane Footpath Improvement scheme and to seek approval for the widening of the existing path to a 2.5m wide Shared Use Path, as well as the introduction of associated Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Recommendation(s): The Area Committee is asked to consider and approve the following proposals for the Green Lane Footpath Improvement scheme; to consider and comment upon the following proposals, and recommend that the Area Committee approves the legal advertising of the following Traffic Regulation Order and that, subject to no objections being received within 21 days from the advertisement date, the following orders can be made: No Waiting At Any Time Location Extent Green Lane Eastern side from a point 45 metres to the north of the projected northern kerbline of Kennedy Way in a northerly direction for a distance of 6 metres, then along the northern kerbline in a westerly direction for a distance of 7 metres, then along the western kerbline in a southerly direction for a distance of 6 metres (around the cul-de-sac end). Relevant Scrutiny Committee (if decision called in): (d) Communities & Housing Scrutiny Committee AGENDA ITEM
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walks in Farnham
    Walks around Farnham Ten circular walks are included in this booklet, all starting at the Village Hall, where parking may be available. They are rated as easy, moderate or long, cover all parts of the Parish and visit all the features mentioned in this introduction. To achieve the best possible circuits, the walks also take in parts of Albury, Manuden and Stansted Mountfitchet parishes. All the paths and bridleways are in good condition, but the inevitable mud of winter can slow progress somewhat. Boots or wellies are advisable for all but the driest conditions. To help walkers find routes, waymarkers are placed at strategic points within the Parish boundaries. Most surrounding parishes are also waymarked. Yellow arrows designate footpaths, blue arrows indicate bridleways. For your assistance, alphabetical pointers (A), (B), (C), etc. are included on each map and are referenced in the text for that walk. Although Farnham has an extensive rights of way network, there is no route to beat the bounds and so walk 10 is called “The Farnham Round” and very roughly beats the Parish Boundary, visits some pubs, pays respects to neighbouring parishes and will suitably exercise the legs of the most energetic! It’s a good day out. Take your time and enjoy the Hertfordshire/Essex border countryside. Acknowledgements This publication is supported by the Parish Paths Partnership, sponsored by Essex County Council. The walks were originally devised by Dr. Nigel Wright. For this first amendment 2007, thanks go to Ian Pinder, Ian DelValle, Malcolm Willis, Barbara Jarman, Chris and Kitty Barrett and our Clerk Peter Jarman, for their contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Lanes and Quiet Lanes: Priority to Pedestrians, Cyclists and Horse Riders
    STATES OF JERSEY GREEN LANES AND QUIET LANES: PRIORITY TO PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND HORSE RIDERS Lodged au Greffe on 15th June 2020 by Deputy R.J. Ward of St. Helier STATES GREFFE 2020 P.79 PROPOSITION THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion − (a) that priority should be given in law to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders in designated Green Lanes and designated ‘quiet lanes’ in the Parishes and that vehicular traffic should only be allowed in such designated Green Lanes and such designated ‘quiet lanes’ for essential travel; (b) to request the Comité des Connétables, to designate the Green Lanes and ‘quiet lanes’ in Parishes where priority should be given, as requested in paragraph (a) above; (c) to request the Comité des Connétables, in consultation with the Minister for Infrastructure, to bring forward for approval the necessary changes to legislation to give effect to paragraphs (a) and (b) by the first quarter of 2021; (d) to request the Comité des Connétables, in consultation with the Minister for Infrastructure, to update the current road signs and markings for Green Lanes in order to show that priority is given in the use of Green Lanes to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders; and (e) to request the Comité des Connétables to undertake a public awareness campaign in conjunction with third parties, as appropriate, regarding the use of Green Lanes and ‘quiet lanes’ and the priority given to pedestrians, cyclist and horse riders. DEPUTY R.J. WARD OF ST. HELIER Page - 2 P.79/2020 REPORT For many years the network of Green lanes in Jersey have been a feature for Islanders and tourists alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Green Lane Park (Saturday Start, Sunday Finish) 1614 Snyder Rd
    Directions to Green Lane Park (Saturday Start, Sunday Finish) 1614 Snyder Rd. Green Lane, PA 18054 From Philadelphia, PA and Southern New Jersey: (approx. 1 hr.) Take 76 W (approx. 12 miles) to EXIT 331B to MERGE onto I-476 N Partial toll road (approx. 15 miles). Take EXIT 31 for PA-63 toward LANSDALE. Bear RIGHT onto PA- 63/SUMNEYTOWN PIKE. CONTINUE to follow PA-63 (approx. 10 miles). TURN LEFT onto GRAVEL PIKE/PA-29 at the LIBERTY GAS STATION. TURN RIGHT at DEEP CREEK ROAD (approx. 2 miles). TURN RIGHT onto Green Lane. Park is the FIRST RIGHT. Parking attendants will direct you to a spot. From Northern New Jersey and New York: (approx. 2 hrs.) From Lincoln Tunnel, take 495 West to I-95 S (approx. 10 miles) Toll Road. Take exit 6 toward I-276 W Toll road. Take exit 20 for I-476 N/NE Extension toward Allentown. Merge onto I-476 N Toll road. Take exit 31 for PA-63 toward Lansdale. Bear right onto PA-63/Sumneytown Pike. Continue to follow PA-63 (approx. 10 miles). Turn left onto Gravel Pike/PA-29. Turn right at Deep Creek Rd. Continue past Snyder Rd. Bear Right. Turn right onto Green Lane Rd. Turn right (first right) into start area, park in grass. Parking attendants will direct you to a spot. From Harrisburg, PA and All points W: (approx. 2 hrs.) Take I- 81 North to I-78 E (signs for PA-78 E/Allentown/Tobyhanna) (approx. 51 miles). Take Exit 51 to mere onto US US-22 E (signs for US-22 E/I-476/State Hwy 309 N/PA Turnpike).
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Green Lanes
    DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL COUNTRYSIDE SERVICE Management of Green Lanes 2012 - 2017 1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 2 2 Terminology ...................................................................................... 2 3 Our Aim ............................................................................................. 4 4 Recording of Public Rights ............................................................... 4 5 Sustainability ..................................................................................... 5 6 Management of Vehicular Use ......................................................... 7 6.1 Control Measures ....................................................................... 8 6.2 Voluntary Restraint..................................................................... 8 6.3 Traffic Regulation Orders ........................................................... 9 7 Barriers ........................................................................................... 10 8 Monitoring ....................................................................................... 10 9 Misuse of non vehicular highways .................................................. 10 10 Motorised Vehicle Trials .............................................................. 11 11 Consultation ................................................................................ 11 12 Policy Summary .......................................................................... 12 1
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Lanes Assessments 1
    BRENTWOOD BOROUGH PROTECTED LANES ASSESSMENTS 1 March 2016 (Draft) Brentwood Borough Protected Lanes Assessment March 2016 2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 5 2 Background ............................................................................................... 5 2.1 Historic Lanes in Essex ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Protected Lanes Policy in Essex ......................................................... 6 2.3 Protected Lanes Policy in Brentwood District Council ........................ 7 3 Reason for the project .............................................................................. 7 4 Protected Lanes Assessment Procedure Criteria and Scoring System .... 9 4.1 Units of Assessment ........................................................................... 9 4.2 Field Assessment ............................................................................. 10 4.2.1 Photographic Record .................................................................. 10 4.2.2 Data Fields: ................................................................................ 10 4.2.3 Diversity ..................................................................................... 10 4.2.4 Historic Integrity.......................................................................... 13 4.2.5 Archaeological Potential ............................................................. 15 4.2.6 Aesthetic Value .........................................................................
    [Show full text]