DOCSLIB.ORG

Regeneration a Public Affairs Simulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regeneration a Public Affairs Simulation reGeneration A Public Affairs Simulation Scenario: On the way to full direct elections in 2020 Legco has approved a 2012 reform of the Functional Constituencies to include representatives of retirees, women not working outside the home and students (groups currently not represented or under-represented in the functional constituencies). This simulation and debate is between two teams, a Red Team of women students representing the women’s list and a Gold Team of men students representing the men’s list, who are competing for the student seat(s) in Legco Functional Constituencies. A third team, the Blue Team, is made up of media/communication majors and those interested in journalism careers. Outcomes: On Day One student representatives will hear panels on and get to ask presenters about campaign strategies, electioneering, candidate selection, party strategy and media strategies as well as issues such as constitutional reform and healthcare reform. Students will negotiate to finalize the format of the debates in terms of town hall meeting style, media-driven debate, or mix of the two and on the time limits and focuses, if any, of segments of the 90 minute debates. The Media Blue Team will organize to conduct the debate, including formulating the questions if a media led debate is chosen or if a mix of town hall and media led debate is decided. The Blue Team will also select their three media questioners/moderators and organize and conduct the videotaping and media production of the simulation/debate process for YouTube. The Red and Gold “parties” will select their list of three candidates to debate and draft their platforms and prepare their campaign materials. For Day Two, students from all teams may invite two friends or family per student to attend the debates on Sunday afternoon. The audience and students will be voting by secret ballot after the debate on who they would vote for based on debate performance. Those not directly running as candidates will be briefing their candidates on issues, preparing handout materials to go to the audience for their candidate or team, making sure invited audience members arrive and soliciting support and votes among the invited audience before the debate begins. A panel of expert former Legco members as judges will comment on the debate and team performance in campaigning and prizes for the top vote getting candidates or teams will be awarded. Stages of Policy Change in a Democracy Voting in a 1 Victorious party becomes 2 ruling party – Forms Government legislates to Democratic System Government give effect to its policy D Votes are cast on the basis of party Government policies undergo political policy Party political policy 3 adjustments E 6 is translated into government policy C Voters translate government Government officials on Government policy national, provincial and Officials policy supported by local government spheres respond to experience into administrative execute policy and community party political implement legislation policy needs and policy suggest 4 adjustments to 5 Policies and legislation impact on the lives government and livelihoods of the citizens F A Citizens make use of different B public participation opportunities to communicate their opinions of policies to Government Optimal service delivery & good governance rely on both clock-wise & anti-clockwise processes to run effectively on an integrated basis. reGeneration A Public Affairs Simulation and UNI Summit Program Rundown SATURDAY November 1 HK Baptist University, Shaw Tower, Senate Chamber 5/F 9 AM: Registration and questionnaire Briefing on simulation process (flow chart) 9:30-10:45 Panel 1: “How to Party” Invited discussants: Allen Lee, Martin Lee, Margaret Ng Presentation by panel on role of candidature, nominations, parties in politics 11:00-12:30 Red, Gold and Blue teams meet: facilitators discuss process and questionnaire results. Blue team (media) meets to organize the video process for rest of simulation. 12:30 Lunch. Teams meet in break-out rooms. 2:00-3:30 Panel 2: “Partying with Others” Invited discussants: Joseph Cheng, Albert Chan, Cheng Kai Nam Presentation on Campaigning, media and voter psychology. (What roles they play and why media and political parties and civic brands form in all countries). 3:30 PM Break 3:45-4:15 Breakout groups discuss debate types and elect their team representatives 4:15-5:15 Discuss and vote by groups on the strategy of the debate 5:15 Plenary: all groups for discussion and negotiation of debate format, led by team representatives, moderated by Dr Michael DeGolyer 6:00 Vote on debate format. 6:30 Dinner Evening for the Teams to prepare for the debate. Sub-teams research issues, prepare campaign materials, refine debate strategies, slogans, make flyers, banners for campaign. SUNDAY November 2 9:00-10:30 Panel 3: Media and debates Alan Leong and Jace Au 10:30-12:00 Red, Gold, Blue teams meet to prepare for the debate. 12:00-2:00 After catered buffet lunch, the U.S. Fulbright student representatives will debate for and against Democrat Obama and Republican McCain as to which candidate and party in power would be best for China-US relations. Moderated by Dr Glenn Shive. All students then vote on their preferred US president. 2 PM Audience gathers, Red and Gold party supporters hand out platform and campaign literature, in Room WLB 203, Shaw Campus. 2:30 Debate begins 4:00 Debate ends, vote by the audience 4:05-4:30 Judges comment on performance of teams and debaters. Invited Judges: Tai Keen Man, Ken Chow, Jimmy Wong, Glenn Shive, Michael DeGolyer 4:30-5:00 Announcement of Results. Program ends. Tel.: (852) 2609-8748 Fax: (852) 2603-5797 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/hkac Mail: The Hong Kong-America Center Ltd. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong Re-Generation: A Public Affairs Simulation Co-organized by the Hong Kong America Center, Hong Kong Baptist University and The National Democratic Institute of International Affairs November 1-2, 2008 Senate Chamber, 5/F, Shaw Tower, Shaw Campus Hong Kong Baptist University Registration Form Name: _____________________________(English) ___________________(Chinese, if applicable) Name you want on your NAME TAG: ___________________________________. Gender: M/F University: ____________________________________________ Fax: ______________________ Correspondence address: ____________________________________________________________ Phone: _____________________________ Mobile Phone: ____________________________ Email: _____________________________ Email (alternative) ________________________ Field of Study: _____________________________________________________________________ Dietary Restrictions or Special Needs, if any:____________________________________________ University Staff Person Recommending You: ____________________________________________ Student Organization(s) in Which You are Active: ________________________________________ Contact information in case of emergency: Name: _____________________________ Relationship: __________________________ Phone: _____________________________ Phone (alternative): _____________________ * The conference sponsors will cover your program-included meals and expenses. Participants are responsible for travel to and from the conference site. Participants are expected to attend the whole conference, i.e. arrive by 8:30am of Saturday and depart around 5pm of Sunday. ** Please return registration form to: hkac@)cuhk.edu.hk or fax (852-2603-5797) before Friday, October 17th to reserve a place. Inquiries: please call Ms. Donna Lam at HKAC: 2609-8755. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Academic Freedom and Critical Speech in Hong Kong: China’S Response to Occupy Central and the Future of “One Country, Two Systems”∗
    Academic Freedom and Critical Speech in Hong Kong: China’s Response to Occupy Central and the Future of “One Country, Two Systems”∗ Carole J. Petersen† and Alvin Y.H. Cheung†† I.!!!!!!Introduction .............................................................................. 2! II.!!!!The “One Country, Two Systems” Model: Formal Autonomy but with an Executive-Led System ...................... 8! III. Legal Protections for Academic Freedom and Critical Speech in Hong Kong’s Constitutional Framework ............ 13! IV. University Governance: The Impact of Increased Centralization and Control ................................................... 20! V. !Conflicts between The Academic Community and the Hong Kong and Central Governments ................................ 28! VI. Beijing’s Retribution: Increased Interference in Hong Kong Universities ................................................................ 40! VII. The Disapearing Booksellers ............................................... 53! VIII. Conclusion ........................................................................... 58! *Copyright © 2016 Carole J. Petersen and Alvin Y.H. Cheung. The authors thank the academics who agreed to be interviewed for this article and research assistants Jasmine Dave, Jason Jutz, and Jai Keep-Barnes for their assistance with research and editing. This is an updated version of a paper presented at a roundtable organized by the Council on Foreign Relations on December 15, 2015, and the authors thank the chair of the roundtable, Professor Jerome A. Cohen, and other participants for their comments. The William S. Richardson School of Law at the University of Hawai’i at Manoa supported Professor Petersen’s travel to Hong Kong to conduct interviews for this article. † Carole J. Petersen is a Professor at the William S. Richardson School of Law and Director of the Matsunaga Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution, University of Hawai’i at Manoa. She taught law at the University of Hong Kong from 1991–2006 and at the City University of Hong Kong from 1989-1991.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 6 November 2014 the Council Continued to Meet at Nine O'clock
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 6 November 2014 1671 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 6 November 2014 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG DR THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. 1672 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 6 November 2014 PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE RONNY TONG KA-WAH, S.C. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, S.B.S., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 立法會 Legislative Council
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(2)1684/99-00 (These minutes have been seen by the Administration) Ref : CB2/PL/CA Legislative Council Panel on Constitutional Affairs Minutes of meeting held on Monday, 21 February 2000 from 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm in the Chamber of the Legislative Council Building Members : Hon Andrew WONG Wang-fat, JP (Chairman) Present Hon Emily LAU Wai-hing, JP (Deputy Chairman) Hon Margaret NG Hon CHEUNG Man-kwong Hon Ambrose LAU Hon-chuen, JP Hon LEE Wing-tat Hon Ronald ARCULLI, JP Hon SZETO Wah Hon Jasper TSANG Yok-sing, JP Hon Gary CHENG Kai-nam Hon Howard YOUNG, JP Dr Hon YEUNG Sum Members : Hon NG Leung-sing Attending Hon Bernard CHAN Public Officers : Mr Michael M Y Suen Attending Secretary for Constitutional Affairs Mr Robin IP Deputy Secretary for Constitutional Affairs (2) - 2 - Ms Doris HO Principal Assistant Secretary for Constitutional Affairs (4) By Invitation : Prof Joseph Y S CHENG City University of Hong Kong Mr Denis EDWARDS City University of Hong Kong Mr Anthony M W LAW City University of Hong Kong Dr J T H TANG The University of Hong Kong Dr LO Shiu-hing The University of Hong Kong Clerk in : Mrs Percy MA Attendance Chief Assistant Secretary (2)3 Staff in : Mr Jimmy MA Attendance Legal Adviser Mrs Eleanor CHOW Senior Assistant Secretary (2)7 Action Column I. Development of the HKSAR’s political system (LC Paper No. CB(2) 1155/99-00(01)) Meeting with academics The Chairman said that the purpose of the meeting was to receive views from academics on the development of the HKSAR’s political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: an International Journal
    Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal Vol. 2, No. 2, August/September 2016 Focus – From Handover to Occupy Campaign: Democracy, Identity and the Umbrella Movement of Hong Kong Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal (CCPS) Chair Wen-cheng Lin, PhD, Director, Institute of China and Asia­Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat­sen University Co­Chair Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh, PhD, Head, Department of Administrative Studies and Politics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya Editor­in­Chief Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh, PhD, Department of Administrative Studies and Politics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD Olga Yurievna Adams, PhD, Moscow State University, Russia Wendy Beekes, PhD, University of Lancaster, United Kingdom Jonathan Benney, PhD, Monash University, Australia Gerald Chan, PhD, University of Auckland, New Zealand Titus C. Chen, PhD, National Sun Yat­sen University, Taiwan John A. Donaldson, PhD, Singapore Management University, Singapore Michael Jakobsen, PhD, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Kamaruding Abdulsomad, PhD, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Juliette Koning, PhD, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom Joanne Hoi-Lee Loh, PhD, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom Mutahir Ahmed, PhD, University of Karachi, Pakistan Can-Seng Ooi, PhD, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Kwok-Tong Soo, PhD, University of Lancaster, United Kingdom Andreas Susanto, PhD,
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: an International Journal
    Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2015 Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, December 2015 ISSN 2410-9681 Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal (CCPS) is a triannual academic journal published by the Institute of China and Asia-Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan, focusing on the Chinese polity, economy and society, and the interrelationship between sociopolitical and socioeconomic factors that influence political, economic and social outcomes in contemporary Mainland China and Taiwan, as well as Hong Kong and Macau, and their politico-economic, strategic relations with other regions and countries. Please visit the CCPS homepage at http://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/files/11­1122­13594.php?Lang=en Manuscripts for consideration and editorial communication should be sent to: The Editor, Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Website Administration and Maintenance: Wu Chien-yi Proofreading: Zhang Yemo, Chang Le Copy-editing and Typesetting: Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh Publishing: Institute of China and Asia-Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal (CCPS) Chair Samuel C.Y. Ku, Director, Institute of China and Asia­Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat­sen University Editor­in­Chief Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh, Department of Administrative Studies and Politics, University of Malaya INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD Olga Yurievna Adams, Moscow State University Wendy Beekes, University of Lancaster Jonathan Benney, Monash University Gerald Chan, University of Auckland Titus C.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will Happen to Hong Kong After 2047?
    Gittings: What Will Happen to Hong Kong after 2047? WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO HONG KONG AFTER 2047? DANNY GITTINGS* I. INTRODUCTION China guaranteed that Hong Kong would be allowed to follow a different system from the rest of the country for fifty years from June 30, 1997, under the policy of "one country, two systems." June 30, 2047, marks the expiration date of this guarantee. As June 30, 2047, approaches, more questions concerning what will happen to Hong Kong are expected to emerge.' Both the Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong (the 1984 bilateral treaty in which Britain and China agreed to the terms of the 1997 handover), and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special * Danny Gittings is an Assistant Professor and Senior Programme Director at the College of Humanities and Law of the University of Hong Kong's School of Professional and Continuing Education. The author would like to express his thanks to Professor Richard Cullen, of the University of Hong Kong's Faculty of Law, for providing the initial inspiration for this article, and to Hugh Chiverton, Head of Radio Television Hong Kong's Radio 3, for hosting the radio panel discussion on which this article is partly based. 1. Under Article 1 of the 1982 Constitution of the People's Republic of China, "[tihe socialist system is the basic system of the People's Republic of China." XIANFA art. 1 (1982) (China) [hereinafter CHINA CONSTITUTION]. Hong Kong's two foundational documents, the Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong and Hong Kong's constitution and the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, provide that Hong Kong's capitalist system "shall remain unchanged for 50 years" from July 1, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Law in Hong Kong: Quo Vadis - a Study of Article 23 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title National Security Law in Hong Kong: Quo Vadis - A Study of Article 23 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4kh840h4 Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 19(2) Authors Fu, H.L. Cullen, Richard Publication Date 2002 DOI 10.5070/P8192022149 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLES NATIONAL SECURITY LAW IN HONG KONG: QUO VADIS A STUDY OF ARTICLE 23 OF THE BASIC LAW OF HONG KONG H. L. Fu and Richard Cullen* I. INTRODUCTION Since the creation of "British Hong Kong" more than 150 years ago, and especially since the formation of the People's Re- public of China (PRC) in 1949, Hong Kong and the PRC have developed two entirely different legal and political cultures. As the termination of the lease over Hong Kong's New Territories drew closer in the 1980s, a treaty was entered into (known as the Joint Declaration) between the PRC and the United Kingdom. The Joint Declaration set out various grounds for the reunifica- tion of the (British) Territory of Hong Kong with Mainland China.1 This resumption of sovereignty took place on July 1, 1997 when Hong Kong became the Hong Kong Special Adminis- trative Region (HKSAR) of the PRC. Following the signing of the Joint Declaration,the Basic Law2 of the HKSAR was drafted * H. L. Fu is currently an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Hong Kong. Richard Cullen is currently a Visiting Professor at the School of Law at the City University of Hong Kong and is also a Professor in the Department of Business Law and Taxation at Monash University in Victoria, Aus- tralia.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 16
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 16 October 2014 285 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 16 October 2014 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG DR THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, B.B.S., M.H. 286 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 16 October 2014 PROF THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P., Ph.D., R.N. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE RONNY TONG KA-WAH, S.C. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN, J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, B.B.S., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Recent Community and Political Situation in Hong Kong
    Report on the Recent Community and Political Situation in Hong Kong January 2015 Content Chapter One: Background 1 Chapter Two: Summary of Important Events Related to 5 Constitutional Development Chapter Three: Relevant Opinion Polls 20 Chapter Four Concluding Remarks 21 Annex I: Decision of the Standing Committee of the National 22 People’s Congress on Issues Relating to the Selection of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region by Universal Suffrage and on the Method for Forming the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the Year 2016 (Adopted at the Tenth Session of the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People’s Congress on 31 August 2014) Annex II: Events Related to Constitutional Development 28 During the Report Period Appendix I: Statements Related to Constitutional Development * Made by Various Groups Appendix II: Opinion Polls Related to Constitutional * Development Conducted by Various Organisations * The above appendices have been uploaded to www.2017.gov.hk. Members of the public may visit the website to browse the contents of the appendices. i Chapter One: Background Constitutional Provisions 1.01 Article 45 of the Basic Law provides that: “The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress. The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures.” 1.02 Since the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), the political structure of Hong Kong has been developing towards the ultimate aim of universal suffrage in a gradual and orderly manner in accordance with the Basic Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Autonomy in Greater China
    YEP Explores the dynamics of central–local interaction in modern China N Local autonomy is a complex and often contentious issue in E many countries, not least because the situation often involves GOTIATI a process of continuous (re)negotiation. Moreover, the actual NEGOTIATING power relationship is defined not only by legal permissibility but also by such other factors as varying political perceptions, AUTONOMY IN economic interests and previous encounters between the centre and periphery. This volume demonstrates that Hong Kong is a good illustration of the intricacies of the dynamic relationship N GREATER CHINA in a Chinese context. The territory has a long history of G pursuing its own path, both in colonial times and since 1997. A Hong Kong and its Sovereign With essays spanning both periods, the volume offers an UTO understanding of the mind-set and actions of both Beijing and Before and After 1997 Hong Kong in pursuing their goals. N In addition, by taking in the wider provincial situation in China and following developments since the establishment OM of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the volume also Edited by Ray Yep provides a nuanced framework for evaluating central–local interaction in general. Y I Ray Yep is a Professor of Politics and Assistant Head of the N Department of Public and Social Administration, City University G of Hong Kong. R E AT E R CHI Governance in Asia series N A www.niaspress.dk Yep-cover.indd 1 10/06/2013 12:09 NEGOTIATING AUTONOMY IN GREATER CHINA Governance in Asia Series Editor: Tak-Wing Ngo, Professor of Political Science, University of Macau ([email protected]) Most Asian countries have experienced radical social transformation in the past decades.
    [Show full text]