The Black Arts Funding Trap Why a New Model Is Needed for Funding BAME Arts Projects MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Black Arts Funding Trap Why a New Model Is Needed for Funding BAME Arts Projects MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 2 MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 The Black Arts Funding Trap Why a new model is needed for funding BAME arts projects MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 2 Foreword Introduction MeWe360 (or ‘MeWe’) has spent the past five years running an action Funding is the focus of this paper, specifically how different kinds of research project to find and test new and more effective approaches to funding models can either hinder or support an increase in BAME driving diversity in the arts 1. The project was built on 20 years’ previous participation in the sector. (When we use the term ‘diversity’ it is in the experience and 10 years’ research in this field see( Appendix 1a). context of ‘race/ethnicity’ and when we use the term ‘participation’ we are referring to people who are active producers, creators and entrepreneurs, We are now at the point where we feel that it is imperative to share our key whether they be musicians, film-makers, writers, agents or producers.) findings regarding the specific challenges for BAME (Black and Minority Our expectation is that this participation then spills over into generating Ethnic) talent, to have conversations about possible solutions and to help a more diverse audience for the arts and creative industries. create action plans for change. This paper is our first attempt to begin such a process and is one of a series of interactive thought pieces inviting anyone Firstly, we reflect on how BAME-focused and BAME-led organisations interested to ask questions and share experiences. have been funded in the last 30 years. Our contention is that a large amount of money has been invested in BAME organisations but little has The subject of the paper is ‘Funding’. It looks at how current and historic fundamentally changed as a result of these investments. We then propose funding models can hinder the increase of BAME participation in the sector. an alternative model that we believe can deliver sustainable funding to We also constructively attempt to offer an alternative solution. This is our improve BAME participation for the long-term in the arts and creative attempt to bring a new perspective on an old topic - arts policy 2. industries. In this paper we set out our own position. It is one that we believe is a strong and credible path forward for BAME funding which explicitly includes support for MeWe itself. This is because, to our knowledge, we are the only We have kept the paper short to maximise engagement, BAME hub working in our particular way. recognising that this necessarily means some complex issues are given fairly cursory treatment. Our expectation is that we This paper is an invitation to the beginnings of a conversation and we can address this in subsequent dialogue and in our follow-up are keen to hear voices that question, support, or help us deepen our provocations. Let us know what you think. thinking and, most importantly, move the sector towards real change in improving diversity. @MeWe360 (#MeWeLetsTalk) Kevin Osborne, CEO MeWe360 MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 3 How Funding is Designed to Support Increased Diversity Whether through the Creative Case for Diversity or any predecessor To what extent can we be confident that new schemes like Elevate, Change strategy, the Arts Council and other funders have stated (and restated many Makers and Sustained Theatre are not a continuation of these approaches times) their commitment to fostering diverse arts and creative industries: that have made little or no overall impact? diverse audiences, diverse talent and a diverse workforce. The Creative Despite many individual success stories, the numbers tell a depressing Case marks a radical and complex departure from previous approaches ,3 and familiar story. There has been no significant increase in audiences 7, yet funding is still the main lever that is used to affect change in the sector. leadership 8 or artistic talent 9 in the sector. Most of the organisations and We estimate that in the past 30 years more than £100 million has been programmes that have received any significant part of this multi-million spent in an attempt to make the arts culture sector more racially diverse .4 spend have either closed, are under threat of closure, or are no longer In essence, funding has been used to support schemes in pursuit of the under BAME leadership.10 We now have a legacy of institutions that are following objectives: developing BAME audiences, encouraging BAME either permanently dependent on grants or perpetually on the brink of enrolment in arts education, increasing the numbers of BAME trainees, failure due to their vulnerability as a result of any potential changes in apprentices and workers, supporting BAME non-profit organisations, funding or political regimes. 11 supporting BAME enterprises, supporting BAME leaders. Funders and organisations have blamed each other for the lack of progress The recommendations from contemporary reports (in particular the but the truth lies between them; it is a systemic failure, exacerbated by a excellent report by Consilium in 2014,5 which is currently being updated) culture of silence. Neither funders nor organisations have talked publicly about echo those made years and even decades ago: greater visibility of BAME what has been happening, nor has any robust longitudinal research been done workforce, more showcasing of talent, more spent on education and to look at the results of investment in BAME organisations and programmes.12 audience development, a need for a more equitable distribution of funding, The inevitable and uncomfortable conclusion of any such research would have tailored leadership development. The fact that these challenges persist, been that in relation to BAME projects, the funding system is not fit for purpose despite the injection of millions of pounds over many years, suggests and is perhaps one of the biggest causes for the failure of major BAME a different approach is needed. organisations and programmes. Some extinct (and possibly now forgotten) endeavours that have been bankrolled by funders in the past 15 years include: Decibel, Inspire, Roots, Whose Theatre, Inscribe, Positive Action Trainee Programmes, Black Regional Theatre Initiative, Arts Capital Programme and Making the Map.6 MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 4 The Problem with Grant Funding In a speech in December 2014 Arts Council Chair Sir Peter Bazalgette The BAME community is largely creative and entrepreneurial (i.e. more said, “the plain fact is that despite many valuable, well-intentioned policies likely to gravitate towards the creative industries such as TV, film, fashion, over the past decade, when it comes to diversity, we have not achieved design and commercial music) and does not naturally fit with the grants- what we intended. We are not doing well enough.” 13 funded ‘classic’ or ‘traditional’ arts sector. This has been an undercurrent in discussions about culture and the creative industries since the beginning We have been reflecting on why that is the case. of these debates in the 1980s. 16 It is our contention that grant funding is inherently problematic when it Public funding for most BAME organisations is often only in the form comes to supporting BAME artists and entrepreneurs for the following of short term project funding (two to three years) and not an investment in reasons: funding decisions have not been grounded in the needs/ the long term (seven to ten years) of the organisations themselves. These demands of the BAME community; funding has tended to be used organisations therefore become unable to plan long-term and invest in their for short term project activity rather than investment in the long term own growth, which would build the self-sufficiency and resilience they need. sustainability of the organisations; and grant funding can quash Instead, the funding system reinforces a cycle of ‘apply and spend’ rather entrepreneurialism. than ‘build and consolidate’. A high percentage of arts funding in the UK comes from public sources: government grant in aid and money from the National Lottery Good Causes scheme supplement local government funding and a patchwork of other smaller pots of money. 14 Historically in the UK, public funding decisions have tended to be politically driven and concentrated on supply- side interventions (more art in more places for as low a cost as possible) rather than being demand-led and responsive to market needs (a rare exception is Creative People and Places) .15 “ the plain fact is that In many instances BAME-led organisations struggle to sustain themselves despite many valuable, through trading activity because, though there may have been genuine social/political drivers for these projects (e.g. regeneration of deprived well-intentioned policies areas) there has been insufficient demand (such as paying audiences or over the past decade, clients) to sustain them without grants. They are short-term beneficiaries yet long-term victims of this traditional approach to the use of funding. when it comes to diversity, we have not achieved what we intended. We are not doing well enough ” MEWE PROVOCATION PAPER 1 5 There is a cultural heritage to these debates that cannot be overlooked. Money has been used to soften or counterbalance the impact of market This year is the 40th anniversary of the publication of Naseem Khan’s failure (organisations surviving due to the injection of subsidy and without landmark book The Arts Britain Ignores 17 and it feels appropriate at this a foundation of established demand or customers/subscribers/clients). juncture to recognise that BAME communities in the UK are still battling The pressure this places upon the leaders of such organisations increases inequities that result from systemic racism that has informed funding the chance of failure and mismanagement. Organisations that lack a sound and political decisions over many decades.
Recommended publications
  • ISPA International Society for the Performing Arts
    International Society for the ISPA Performing Arts TODAY’S FUTURE FOR THE ARTS NEW YORK CONGRESS JANUARY 8–10, 2019 Theatre buildings by theatre people for theatre people. Clockwise from top left: Linbury Theatre, Royal Opera House; The Yard at Chicago Shakespeare Theater; Hudson Theatre, Broadway; Studio Theatre, Bristol Old Vic. MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR OF ISPA Dear Friends, ransitions. We all think about them. Some of us worry about them. But we are all impacted by them. As much as we may try to be present each moment of our days, it is the rare person who does not ponder what comes next. Transitions can be as exhilarating as they are scary. In these times of rapid-fire change and volatility (mostly beyond our personal control), it is Teasy to default to a position of wanting to hang on to what we know. Stay the course. Be steady. Reduce risk. WELCOME Yet continuing to do the same thing that works for us today may be the very act that fails us tomorrow. Our Congress Co-chairs Collette Brennan and Steinunn Ragnarsdóttir have given us a brilliantly provocative theme to consider with an array of thought-leaders from within our field and beyond offering varied perspectives on how we might navigate the inevitability of the transitions we encounter. For me, transitions is a particularly apt theme as I prepare to pass on the chairmanship of ISPA to our colleague Tisa Ho. As an ISPA member for 20 years and board member for most of that time, I have been fortunate to work with so many gifted members who have given selflessly in leading ISPA through incredible Transitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Poll Findings and Methodology
    PUBLIC POLL FINDINGS AND METHODOLOGY Misinformation around U.S. Capitol unrest, election spreading among Americans New Ipsos poll shows Capitol rioters viewed as “criminals,” “right-wing terrorists,” but views divided sharply along partisan lines Topline Findings Washington, DC, January 19, 2021 – In the wake of the January 6th storming of the U.S. Capitol, Ipsos took another look at beliefs toward misinformation and election-related conspiracy theories. There is over a 60-point gap between Democrats and Republicans regarding whether Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 presidential election, a sign of how politically divided this country is, and what facts we are willing to accept. Following the attack last week, most Americans see the people who entered the Capitol as criminals or right-wing domestic terrorists and, as a result, support the suspension of the president’s social media accounts. Detailed Findings 1. Most of the American public views the people who entered the Capitol as criminals or right-wing domestic terrorists. A plurality support social media outlets removing President Trump and QAnon accounts as a result of the event. • Nearly one in three (31%) say they are criminals, and 26% say they are right-wing terrorists. • Just four percent believe they are patriots who were fighting to preserve our freedoms. • News consumption plays a role in views of the events, as does partisanship. • For example, one in four who get their news from FOX or conservative online outlets believe they were left-wing terrorists or Antifa, compared to just 7% of CNN or MSNBC viewers. Forty-five percent of Democrats see these people as right-wing domestic terrorists, while 10% of Republicans feel the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media
    Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media A Research Paper submitted to the Department of Engineering and Society Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia • Charlottesville, Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science, School of Engineering Luke Giraudeau Spring, 2021 On my honor as a University Student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments Signature __________________________________________ Date __________ Luke Giraudeau Approved __________________________________________ Date __________ Richard Jacques, Department of Engineering and Society Introduction In the United States, public opinion about tech companies’ political biases is divided along partisan lines (Vogels, Perrin, & Anderson, 2020). In the U.S. since 2018, 69 percent of Republicans claim that technology companies favor liberal views, whereas only 19 percent of Democrats say that technology companies favor the alternative view. Over 50 percent of liberals believe that perspectives are treated equally, whereas only 22 percent of conservatives feel this way. Critics who allege bias have organized to promote legislation such as the Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act (2020) as well as an executive order (Executive Order 13,925, 2020). Furthermore, conservative entrepreneurs have produced new social media platforms such as Gab and Parler that claim
    [Show full text]
  • Mewe​®​ Launches Journals — the Future of Photo/Video Albums Rapidly Growing Facebook Competitor Gives Members a Fun
    ® MeWe ​ Launches Journals — The Future of Photo/Video Albums ​ Rapidly growing Facebook competitor gives members a fun and unique way to organize, save, and share their Stories LOS ANGELES, June 29, 2020 – Tired of seeing your favorite SNAP and INSTA Stories ® disappear? Join the MeWe movement! Upstart MeWe ,​ the rapidly growing ​ ​ “Anti-Facebook” with data privacy, free speech and no ads, today launches Journals – the first feature of its kind on any social network. The idea for Journals was born in the ascent of Stories. In recent years, Stories have become social media's favored 24-hour lifecycle medium for creating and sharing brief videos of special moments and daily life events. With MeWe Journals, members can save, sort, and organize their favorite Stories beyond the moment - for a lifetime of memories and sharing. MeWe Journals Allow Members To: ● Organize and aggregate their favorite Stories into Journals on their profiles ● Sort Stories by friend or family member, topic, timeline, or anyway they’d like ● Choose to make each Journal visible to only themselves; their contacts; Close Friends; or open to anyone on MeWe ● Create up to 500 Journals, and each Journal can contain up to 1,000 Stories MeWe Journals can be created and edited on MeWe’s mobile app (available on iOS and Android), and then can be viewed on both mobile and desktop. Journals are included with MeWe Premium ($4.99 per month) or can be purchased a-la-carte in the ​ ​ MeWe Store for $1.99 per month. MeWe members given view access by a Journal creator can see that member’s Journal without subscribing.
    [Show full text]
  • New Titles Spring 2021 Spring Titles New
    SUBJECTS NOG AANPASSEN JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY P.O. Box 36224 nl-1020 me Amsterdam / The Netherlands SPRING 2021 Linguistics Literary studies Philosophy Translation studies John Benjamins Publishing Company catalog.NT.2021.SPRING.cover.indd 1 11/02/2021 12:25:55 JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM/PHILADELPHIA www.benjamins.com Main office (all customers except North America) Customers in North America John Benjamins Publishing Company Orders & Payments Klaprozenweg 75g John Benjamins Publishing Company P.O. Box 36224 P.O. Box 960 nl-1020 me Amsterdam Herndon VA 20172-0960, USA The Netherlands Tel.: 800 562-5666 0 Fax 703 661-1501 Tel. +31 20 6304747 / Fax +31 20 6739773 For book orders: [email protected] For book/e-book orders: [email protected] Returns Department John Benjamins Publishing Company For E-mail queries: 22880 Quicksilver Drive [email protected] Dulles VA 20166, USA General Ordering Information • Postage and packing will be charged additionally. • All books may be ordered through your regular bookseller or For a summary of these charges: directly from the publisher. Orders from customers in the U.S.A., www.benjamins.com/content/customers/bookorders Canada and Mexico will be filled by our office in Herndon VA. • For sales within the European Union, VAT will be charged (U.S.A.). Customers from countries where we have exclusive unless a VAT number is supplied with the order. distributors should order from these directly. Customers from all other territories should direct their orders to our office in • For sales within the U.S.A. local sales tax, if applicable, will Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Netclean Report 2019
    NETCLEAN REPORT 2019 A REPORT ABOUT CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CRIME 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION p. 4–5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p. 6–7 ABOUT THE REPORT p. 8–9 RESULTS EIGHT INSIGHTS INTO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CRIME p. 10–11 PART ONE: LAW ENFORCEMENT SURVEY p. 12–13 1. The spread of live-streamed child sexual abuse p. 14–17 2. Victims of live-streamed child sexual abuse p. 18–19 3. Offenders who consume live-streamed child sexual abuse p. 20–25 4. How child sexual abuse material is stored p. 28–31 5. Apps and platforms are used to store and distribute child sexual abuse material p. 32–33 6. Emerging technologies – trends, challenges and opportunities p. 36–40 PART TWO: BUSINESS SURVEY p. 44–45 7. Businesses’ use of policies and action plans to protect their IT environment from child sexual abuse material p. 46–47 8. Businesses’ use of technologies to protect their IT environment from child sexual abuse material p. 48–49 PART THREE: MAPPING OF TECHNOLOGIES p. 52–53 Binary hashing p. 54 Robust hashing p. 55 Artificial Intelligence p. 56 Keyword matching p. 57 Filter technology p. 58 Blocking technology p. 59 IN CLOSING TECHNOLOGY – A DRIVER OF BOTH PROBLEM AND SOLUTION p. 60 SAFEGUARDED CHILDREN IN 2018 AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS p. 62 2 3 INTRODUCTION BY USING TECHNOLOGY TO About John F. Clark and NCMEC John F. Clark is president and CEO of the National Center OUR ADVANTAGE WE for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC). Clark has an extensive law-enforcement background, including 28 years with the United States Marshals Service (USMS).
    [Show full text]
  • Biofilm-Based Nosocomial Infections
    Biofi lm-Based Nosocomial Infections Edited by Gianfranco Donelli Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Pathogens www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens Gianfranco Donelli (Ed.) Biofilm-Based Nosocomial Infections This book is a reprint of the special issue that appeared in the online open access journal Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) in 2014 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens/special_issues/Biofilm-Based). Guest Editor Gianfranco Donelli Microbial Biofilm Laboratory (LABIM) IRCCS "Fondazione Santa Lucia" Italy Editorial Office MDPI AG Klybeckstrasse 64 Basel, Switzerland Publisher Shu-Kun Lin Senior Assistant Editor Xiaoyan Liu 1. Edition 2015 MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan ISBN 978-3-03842-135-1 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-136-8 (PDF) © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. All articles in this volume are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. However, the dissemination and distribution of physical copies of this book as a whole is restricted to MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. III Table of Contents List of Contributors ............................................................................................................... V About the Guest Editor .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ADVISORY BOARD March 2020
    1 ADVISORY BOARD March 2020 Sir Tim Berners-Lee Inventor of the World Wide Web Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web in 1989. He wrote the first web client and server in 1990. His specifications of URIs, HTTP and HTML were refined as Web technology spread. He is the Director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), a Web standards organization founded in 1994 that develops interoperable technologies (specifications, guidelines, software, and tools) to lead the Web to its full potential. He is the 3Com Founders Professor of Engineering in the School of Engineering with a joint appointment in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Laboratory for Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (CSAIL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where he also heads the Decentralized Information Group (DIG). Tim is a Director of the World Wide Web Foundation and is a member of the UK's Transparency Board, and president of London's Open Data Institute. Dany Garcia CEO, The Garcia Companies and Seven Bucks Productions As Chairwoman and CEO of The Garcia Companies, Dany is the visionary architect behind some of today’s most successful enterprises, brands and talent. In this capacity, she is the very successful manager of Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. In addition, Dany is the CEO of Seven Bucks Productions, a full-service production company she and Johnson co-founded. Dany is the recipient of many awards and recognitions, and her passion for bettering the world through socially responsible decisions is consistently reflected in the culture of her teams and the businesses she builds.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Resilience & Confronting Risk
    BUILDING RESILIENCE & CONFRONTING RISK A PARENTS & CAREGIVERS GUIDE TO ONLINE RADICALIZATION POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH AND INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) PERIL brings the resources and expertise of the university sector to bear on the problem of growing youth polarization and extremist radicalization, through scalable research, intervention, and public education ideas to reduce rising polarization and hate. SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER The SPLC seeks to be a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. CONTENTS PARENTS & CAREGIVERS GUIDE 3 WHAT IS ONLINE RADICALIZATION? WHY SHOULD YOU CARE? 4 RECOGNIZING WARNING SIGNS 5 UNDERSTANDING THE DRIVERS 6 ENGAGE & EMPOWER 8 RESPONDING TO HATE 10 HOW TO GET HELP 11 APPENDIX: STAYING ALERT TO SITES, PLATFORMS, & APPS FREQUENTLY EXPLOITED BY EXTREMISTS 15 ENDNOTES 16 CREDITS 17 ILLUSTRATIONS BY CLAUDIA WHITAKER Whether you live with a young person, or now work virtually with youth, radicalization to extremism is something we all should be concerned about. Extremists looking to recruit and convert children are predatory. Like all forms of child exploitation, extremist recruitment drives a wedge between young people and the adults they would typically trust. Radicalization is a problem for our entire society, from the innocent people it victimizes to the family bonds it breaks apart. 2 A PARENTS AND CAREGIVERS GUIDE TO ONLINE RADICALIZATION PARENTS & CAREGIVERS GUIDE Who is this guide for? We wrote this guide with a wide range Whether you live with a young person or work with youth of caregivers in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • National Directory of Youth Demilitarization Groups | NNOMY.Org
    National Directory of Youth Demilitarization Groups | NNOMY.org Organization Submission Form Use this form to add your organization doing youth demilitarization or counter-recruitment activism in schools or the community into the National Directory of Youth Demilitarization Groups. This will associate you with the community of activists engaged in this activism nationally and will add your to the contact list of The National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth. You will be opted into our mailing list of new resources developed for this activism and to our monthly newsletter as well. You can opt-out at any time. Fill this PDF form out and return it to [email protected] with the subject line of your email “Submitting Org to the NDYDG” Those items with an * are required information to be listed Organizational Name:* Address* City* State or Territory* Zipcode* Phone Email address* Organizational Website (Address Link) Organizational Blog (Address Link) Community Discussion List (Address Link) Facebook (Address Link) Mewe (Address Link) Instagram (Address Link) Pinterest (Address Link) Twitter (Address Link) YouTube (Address Link) LinkedIn (Address Link) Scope of organization: International National Regional Local Virtual This organization is a: (What best describes organization) * Organization base: (Who are the organizers? Select One) * National Directory of Youth Demilitarization Groups | NNOMY.org Organization Submission Form Outreach to specific communities: (You can select multiples here) African American Asian Arab Educators Faith
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Weinstein Is the Founder and Chief Evangelist of Mewe. Mark Is World Renowned As a Leading Privacy Advocate and One Of
    Mark Weinstein is the Founder and Chief Evangelist of MeWe. Mark is world renowned as a leading privacy advocate and one of the visionary inventors of social networking. Mark’s TED Talk in March 2020: “The Rise of Surveillance Capitalism”. Mark is ranked one of the "Top 8 Minds in Online Privacy," and was named “Privacy by Design Ambassador” by The Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada. Mark's articles about privacy and social media have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, NY Post, The Mirror (UK), HuffPost, USA Today, and many others. He has been interviewed on CNN, Fox News, Fox Business, BBC, PBS, etc. Mark has been a featured speaker and social media/privacy expert on the stage at many conferences around the globe, including EY’s Strategic Growth Forum, KNOW Identity Conference, Global Security Conference, GMIC New York, Security BSides Vancouver, and Customer Experience Asia. Back in 1998, Mark created SuperFamily.com and SuperFriends.com, which were ranked by PC Magazine as “Top 100” sites 3 years in a row. Mark sold those companies in the early 2000s and then built an executive coaching company, also giving keynotes and authoring books on personal and professional greatness, titled “Habitually Great", which won 2 Indie Book awards and were endorsed by Stephen Covey. A decade later, as Facebook began to dominate social media, Mark Zuckerberg stated, “Privacy is a social norm of the past,” and that statement made Mark Weinstein's jaw drop. With guidance from MeWe Advisor, Sir Tim Berners-Lee (the inventor of the Web), Mark endeavored to build the next-generation social media experience that gives people all the great features of social media while eliminating spying, targeting, newsfeed manipulation, and undermining democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Polarization and Platform Migration: a Study of Parler and Twitter Usage by United States of America Congress Members
    Political Polarization and Platform Migration: A Study of Parler and Twitter Usage by United States of America Congress Members Jacqueline M. Otala Graduate Student Clarkson University, [email protected], 1 INTRODUCTION Gillian Kurtic Growing dissatisfaction with platform governance decisions at Undergraduate Studen, Clarkson University, [email protected], major social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram has led to a number of substantial efforts to shift to new Isabella Grasso platforms. Undergraduate Student, Clarkson University, [email protected], Facebook and Twitter have both added limitations on content, Yu Liu, including flagging posts, disabling posts to be shared, and removing the post. While initially focusing on removing hate speech and Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Clarkson University, Ph.D., [email protected], terrorist propaganda, Facebook moved toward regulating misinformation about some key topics such as COVID-19 and the Jeanna Matthews 2020 presidential election. These efforts have been far from Professor of Computer Science Department, Clarkson University, smooth. Facebook’s content moderation policies along with their Ph.D., [email protected], fact-checking outsourcing has roused concerns of unaccountable censorship [1] and when the platform rolled out a campaign to *Corresponding Author Golshan Madraki reduce COVID-19 misinformation, they had to overhaul it due to a Assistant Professor of David. D. Reh School of Business, Clarkson lack of specificity [2] [3]. University, Ph.D., [email protected], Twitter initially was referred to as “the free speech wing of the free speech party” [4]. However, in recent years, they have moved to restrict some content after observing increasing abuse on their ABSTRACT platform [5].
    [Show full text]