Judicial Activity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Judicial Activity COUR DE JUSTICE CVRIA DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2016 / 2016 JUDICIAL ACTIVITY JUDICIAL ACTIVITY COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTORATE QD-AP-17-001-EN-C PUBLICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC MEDIA UNIT EN COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNUAL REPORT 2016 JUDICIAL ACTIVITY Synopsis of the judicial activity of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal Luxembourg, 2017 curia.europa.eu COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COURT OF JUSTICE GENERAL COURT CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL L-2925 LUXEMBOURG L-2925 LUXEMBOURG L-2925 LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG TEL. +352 4303-1 TEL. +352 4303-1 TEL. +352 4303-1 The Court of Justice on the Internet: curia.europa.eu Completed on: 1 January 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The photographs may be reproduced only in the context of this publication. For any other use, authorisation must be sought from the Court of Justice of the European Union. A great deal of information on the European Union is available on the internet through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Court of Justice of the European Union / Communication Directorate / Publications and Electronic Media Unit Publications Office of the European Union Print ISBN 978-92-829-2312-2 ISSN 2467-0987 doi:10.2862/09365 QD-AP-17-001-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-829-2313-9 ISSN 2467-1215 doi:10.2862/413819 QD-AP-17-001-EN-N ePUB ISBN 978-92-829-2362-7 ISSN 2467-1215 doi:10.2862/386568 QD-AP-17-001-EN-E © European Union, 2017 Photos © Georges Fessy Photos © Gediminas Karbauskis Printed in Luxembourg PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER (ECF) CONTENTS CONTENTS Foreword by Mr K. Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice of the European Union 8 CHAPTER I | THE COURT OF JUSTICE A. The Court of Justice in 2016: changes and activity 12 B. Case-law of the Court of Justice in 2016 14 I. Fundamental rights 14 II. Citizenship of the Union 15 1. Rights of Union citizens 15 2. Derived right of residence of third country nationals 17 III. Institutional provisions 19 1. Legal basis of acts of the European Union 19 2. Competence and powers of the institutions 22 IV. EU law and national law 23 V. Proceedings of the European Union 25 VI. Agriculture 26 VII. Freedoms of movement 28 1. Freedom of movement for workers 28 2. Free movement of goods 30 3. Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services 30 VIII. Border controls, asylum and immigration 34 1. Asylum policy 34 2. Immigration policy 38 IX. Judicial cooperation in civil matters 39 1. Brussels I Regulation 39 2. Rome I and Rome II Regulations 41 X. Judicial cooperation in criminal matters 42 1. European arrest warrant 42 2. Right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings 46 3. Criminal proceedings and decisions in other Member States 47 XI. Competition 48 1. Agreements, decisions and concerted practices 48 2. State aid 50 XII. Fiscal provisions 54 JUDICIAL ACITIVITY 2016 3 CONTENTS XIII. Approximation of laws 55 1. Intellectual property 55 2. Protection of personal data 59 3. Electronic commerce 60 4. Telecommunications 61 5. Tobacco products 62 6. Cosmetic products 63 XIV. Public procurement 64 XV. Economic and monetary policy 66 XVI. Social policy 68 XVII. Consumer protection 69 XVIII. Environment 72 XIX. International agreements 74 XX. Common foreign and security policy 77 C. Activity of the Registry of the Court of Justice in 2016 80 I. A brief statistical overview of judicial activity in 2016 80 II. Communication with the parties and other persons 83 III. Assistance to the members of the Court 84 D. Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of Justice 86 E. Composition of the Court of Justice 114 1. Change in the composition of the Court of Justice in 2016 115 2. Order of precedence 116 3. Former members of the Court of Justice 118 CHAPTER II | THE GENERAL COURT A. Activity of the General Court in 2016 124 1. Organisation 124 2. Statistics concerning judicial activity 125 B. Case-law of the General Court in 2016 128 I. Judicial proceedings 128 Admissibility of actions brought under Article 263 TFEU 128 1. Concept of a measure against which an action may be brought 128 2. Standing to bring an action 129 Direct concern 129 a. Individual effect 130 3. Concept of a regulatory act not entailing implementing measures 131 4 JUDICIAL ACTIVITY 2016 CONTENTS 4. Compliance with procedural requirements and time limits for bringing actions 133 Abuse of procedure 135 Legal aid 135 Application of the new Rules of Procedure 136 II. Law governing the institutions — European citizens’ initiative — Social policy 137 III. Competition rules applicable to undertakings 138 General issues 138 1. Rights of the defence 138 a. Statement of objections 138 b. Right to be heard 139 c. Use of secret recordings of telephone conversations as evidence 139 2. Conditions laid down for the grant of immunity 140 3. Possibility for the Commission to opt for a settlement 141 4. Obligation to state reasons 141 5. Unlimited jurisdiction 142 Developments in the area of Article 101 TFEU 143 1. Concept of potential competition 143 2. Restriction by object 145 a. Non-compete clause 145 b. Disproportionate reverse payments entailing the exclusion of competitors from the market 146 3. Calculation of the amount of the fine 147 IV. State aid 149 Admissibility 149 1. Act against which an action may be brought 149 2. Individual effect 150 Administrative procedure 150 Concept of advantage 152 1. Burden of proof 152 2. Private creditor test 153 Concept of State resources 155 Selectivity — Fiscal aid 156 State aid compatible with the internal market 157 Recovery of aid 158 V. Intellectual property — European Union trade mark 160 Autonomy of the European Union trade mark system 160 Absolute grounds for refusal 161 1. Raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion 161 2. Obligation to state reasons 161 3. Bad faith 162 4. Geographical indication 163 5. Sound marks 164 6. Production of evidence 164 JUDICIAL ACITIVITY 2016 5 CONTENTS Relative grounds for refusal 165 1. Raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion 165 2. Evidence 166 3. Limitation in consequence of acquiescence 168 Procedural issues 168 VI. Common foreign and security policy —Restrictive measures 170 Islamic Republic of Iran 170 Tunisian Republic 173 Ukraine 175 Syrian Arab Republic 176 Fight against terrorism 177 VII. Registration of chemical products 178 VIII. Dumping 180 IX. Supervision of the financial sector 181 X. Public procurement by the institutions of the Union 182 XI. Access to documents of the institutions 183 Application for access to previously disclosed documents 183 Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process 184 Exception relating to the protection of legal advice 185 Exception relating to the protection of judicial proceedings 187 XII. Actions for damages 188 Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union 188 Processing of personal data 189 Powers of OLAF 190 Loss of opportunity 191 XIII. Appeals 192 XIV. Applications for interim measures 192 C. Activity of the Registry of the General Court in 2016 196 I. Organisational effects connected with the entry into office of new judges 197 II. Procedural effects of the reform 198 III. Task of assisting the Court 200 D. Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the General Court 204 E. Composition of the General Court 230 1. Change in the composition of the General Court in 2016 231 2. Order of precedence 233 3. Former members of the General Court 237 6 JUDICIAL ACTIVITY 2016 CONTENTS CHAPTER III | THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL A. Activity of the Civil Service Tribunal in 2016 242 B. Case-law of the Civil Service Tribunal in 2016 244 I. Procedural questions 244 1. Pre-litigation procedure 244 2. Act adversely affecting an official 244 3. Lack of authority of the perpetrator of an act with adverse effect 244 4. Time limits for bringing proceedings 245 5. Costs 245 6. Res judicata 246 II. Questions of substance 246 General conditions for validity of measures and fundamental rights 246 1. Scope of a preamble 246 2. Formal statement of grounds 246 3. Temporal applicability of the provisions of the new Staff Regulations 247 4. Re-examination of administrative measures 247 5. Reliance on the principles in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union 247 6. Duty of sincere cooperation with national courts 248 7. Right to be heard 248 8. Right to sound administration 248 9. Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff 249 10. Right of an official or staff member to access to his file 249 Emoluments and social security benefits of officials 250 1. Social security 250 2. Pensions 251 3. Severance grant 251 4. Advancement in step 252 Car eers of officials and other staff 252 1. Promotion of staff placed at the disposal of a trade union or staff association 252 2. Disciplinary proceedings 252 3. Relocation of temporary and contract staff on the transfer of the seat of an agency from one Member State to another 253 4. Interruption of the career path of a member of staff 253 Whistleblower 254 C. Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Civil Service Tribunal 256 D. Composition of the Civil Service Tribunal 268 JUDICIAL ACITIVITY 2016 7 Foreword by Mr K. Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice of the European Union Koen LENAERTS President of the Court of Justice of the European Union The European Union experienced painful events in the course of 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Romanian Political Science Review Vol. XXI, No. 1 2021
    Romanian Political Science Review vol. XXI, no. 1 2021 The end of the Cold War, and the extinction of communism both as an ideology and a practice of government, not only have made possible an unparalleled experiment in building a democratic order in Central and Eastern Europe, but have opened up a most extraordinary intellectual opportunity: to understand, compare and eventually appraise what had previously been neither understandable nor comparable. Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review was established in the realization that the problems and concerns of both new and old democracies are beginning to converge. The journal fosters the work of the first generations of Romanian political scientists permeated by a sense of critical engagement with European and American intellectual and political traditions that inspired and explained the modern notions of democracy, pluralism, political liberty, individual freedom, and civil rights. Believing that ideas do matter, the Editors share a common commitment as intellectuals and scholars to try to shed light on the major political problems facing Romania, a country that has recently undergone unprecedented political and social changes. They think of Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science Review as a challenge and a mandate to be involved in scholarly issues of fundamental importance, related not only to the democratization of Romanian polity and politics, to the “great transformation” that is taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, but also to the make-over of the assumptions and prospects of their discipline. They hope to be joined in by those scholars in other countries who feel that the demise of communism calls for a new political science able to reassess the very foundations of democratic ideals and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Blogger Voice of Young People
    TALKING LANGUAGES In Sleepyville, Italy, there is a political conversation going on. The Slovenian minority of the city proposed, that lessons of Slovenian language should be obligatory for all secondary schools in the city. Many parties were against this proposal, since only 20% of the population are Slovenians. Parties proposed many different solutions. For example Italian Pirate party was putting its hopes for the future and proposing that everyone should learn Esperanto. They also suggested that we should form a council of children. The Liberal Economical party wanted us to think about the young people, whom council decision will most clearly affect. Feminist party was mainly happy to see so many female faces in the council and especially the gender of the mayor made them really happy. Italian Nationalists party thought, that if Italian kids would learn Slovenian, it would be easier for criminal Slovenian kids to sell them drugs. Meanwhile, the Workers party was again preparing for the revolution. During their speech, the mayor felt a bit insecure and the security was called. Twice the party members were told to back up from the mayor’s table. This seemed to confuse her so much, that she dozed off in some points of the conversation. Someone also told the Workers party members to smoke less weed. During the coffee brake an interesting suspicion was raised. The member of the APP, Oldrich Justa had been seen talking to the mayor before the council meeting. Some suggested corruption, but when asked about personal relationship between Justa and the mayor, the smile on his face couldn't have been wider.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the EU Copyright Framework
    Review of the EU copyright framework European Implementation Assessment Review of the EU copyright framework: The implementation, application and effects of the "InfoSoc" Directive (2001/29/EC) and of its related instruments European Implementation Assessment Study In October 2014, the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) requested from the European Parliament Research Service (EPRS) an Ex Post Impact Assessment on Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (InfoSoc). This EPRS publication was originally commissioned in the context of JURI's own- initiative implementation report, which was adopted in Plenary in July 2015, Rapporteur Julia Reda MEP. However, it is also relevant to the work of JURI Committees' Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights and Copyright (CWG), chaired by Jean Marie Cavada MEP. Furthermore, this request was made in the wider context of the Commission's review of the EU legislative framework on copyright, and the ensuing legislative proposals, which have been a long time in the planning and which are now expected for the 4th quarter of 2015. The objective of these proposals is to modernise the EU copyright framework, and in particular the InfoSoc Directive, in light of the digital transformation. Accordingly, in response to the JURI request, the Ex-Post Impact Assessment Unit of the European Parliament Research Service decided to produce a "European Implementation Assessment on the review of the EU copyright framework". Implementation reports of EP committees are now routinely accompanied by European Implementation Assessments, drawn up by the Ex-Post Impact Assessment Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the European Parliament's Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimenting Liquidfeedback for Online Deliberation in Civic Contexts
    Experimenting LiquidFeedback for Online Deliberation in Civic Contexts Fiorella De Cindio and Stefano Stortone Department of Computer Science, University of Milano Via Comelico 39/41, 20135 Milano {fiorella.decindio,stefano.stortone}@unimi.it Abstract. The growing distrust in political institutions is accompanied by new opportunities for civic involvement through online technological platforms. LiquidFeedback is one of the most interesting, as it embeds innovative features to support online deliberative processes. This software has been designed as an intranet tool for closed and homogeneous groups but it has also recently been used in large civic context, involving generic citizens. Aim of the paper is discussing the potential of LiquidFeedback for these purposes, by presenting the preliminary analysis of the “ProposteAmbrosoli2013” initiative carried on, in occasion of the recent elections in the Lombardy region (Italy). Keywords: LiquidFeedback, online deliberation, democracy, civic participation. 1 Introduction The “endless” crisis of the western models of economy and democracy imposes a renewed effort to imagine and develop new forms of civic engagement (see for instance [13]). The persistent demands coming from the civil society organizations as well as from international organizations [4, 2] find more and more the concrete support of the ICTs. New software tools have been developed to facilitate knowledge sharing and the organization of new practices of crowdsourcing and collaboration. These tools are already being used by public bodies for opening government (see, e.g., [11]) and by the emerging grassroots organizations [3], to build up consultative and deliberative processes. One of the most popular software tools for idea gathering is Ideascale (ideascale.com), already adopted in 2008 to support President Obama’s Open Government Initiative, and afterward widely used worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Digimag46.Pdf
    DIGICULT Digital Art, Design & Culture Founder & Editor-in-chief: Marco Mancuso Advisory Board: Marco Mancuso, Lucrezia Cippitelli, Claudia D'Alonzo Publisher: Associazione Culturale Digicult Largo Murani 4, 20133 Milan (Italy) http://www.digicult.it Editorial Press registered at Milan Court, number N°240 of 10/04/06. ISSN Code: 2037-2256 Licenses: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs - Creative Commons 2.5 Italy (CC BY- NC-ND 2.5) Printed and distributed by Lulu.com E-publishing development: Loretta Borrelli Cover design: Eva Scaini Digicult is part of the The Leonardo Organizational Member Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Marco Mancuso Persepolis 2.0: Creative Support To Iran .................................................................. 3 Mark Hancock Vlogging, Networked Cinematic Poetics ................................................................. 9 Marco Mancuso Pirates At The Parliament: The Big Dream?! .......................................................... 14 Davide Anni A New Center For Art and Technologies ............................................................... 24 Loretta Borrelli Hackmeeting 2009: Meeting With The Debian Community .............................. 27 Philippa Barr Alessandro De Gloria, From Child’s Play To Serious Games ............................... 33 Alessio Galbiati Rip: A Remix Manifesto. A Specter Wanders In The Net .................................... 39 Silvia Casini The Ethics Of Gaze: Raymond Depardon and William Kentridge ...................... 43 Giulia Baldi Soundclusters:
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit May 2019 - PE 640.149 IMPRESSUM AUTHORS Philipp SCHULMEISTER, Head of Unit (Editor) Alice CHIESA, Marc FRIEDLI, Dimitra TSOULOU MALAKOUDI, Matthias BÜTTNER Special thanks to EP Liaison Offices and Members’ Administration Unit PRODUCTION Katarzyna ONISZK Manuscript completed in September 2019 Brussels, © European Union, 2019 Cover photo: © Andrey Kuzmin, Shutterstock.com ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit within the Directorate–General for Communication (DG COMM) of the European Parliament. To contact the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit please write to: public.opinion.monitoring@europarl.europa.eu LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN DISCLAIMER This document is prepared for, and primarily addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS OVERVIEW 1979 - 2019 6 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (31/07/2019) 7 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (02/07/2019) AND OUTGOING EP SINCE 1979 8 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 28 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 29 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 30 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIVE SESSION 31 3.
    [Show full text]
  • (1) Email from Julia REDA to the Cabinet of the Commisioner Maryia Gabriel (Copyright Academic Studies), 08/08/2017, (Ref. Ares(
    Ref. Ares(2017)5138443 - 20/10/2017 ANNEX 1 (1) Email from Julia REDA to the Cabinet of the Commisioner Maryia Gabriel (copyright academic studies), 08/08/2017, (Ref. Ares(2017) 3952025) (3) Email from Julia REDA to the Commisioner Maryia Gabriel, 20/08/2017 (Ref. Ares(2017) 4911834) with attachment: (a) Better regulation for copyright - Collected submissions by the academics (Pdf Format) available at https://juliareda.eu/events/better-regulation-for-copyright/ 1 Doc.1 Ref. Ares(2017)3952025 - 08/08/2017 From: REDA Julia <xxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx> Sent: 08 August 2017 10:13 To: CAB GABRIEL CONTACT Cc: REDA Julia (EP) Subject: Copyright- academic studies overview Dear Commissioner Gabriel, dear Team, following your discussion with Ms Reda, I'm sending you the academic studies evaluating different parts of the European Copyright reform proposal. Kind regards, Eszter Bakó *General - EU copyright reform An academic perspective on the copyright reform Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie, Rosati, Eleonora, Turk, Karmen, Angelopoulos, Christina, Kuczerawy, Aleksandra, Peguera, Miquel and Husovec, Martin http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0267364916302394/1-s2.0-S0267364916302394-main.pdf?_tid=77e880e0-7b52- 11e7-b15e-00000aab0f26&acdnat=1502098158_4c1e2fb3827d46003b80f52612adeafc *article 11 **A publisher’s intellectual property rightImplications for freedom of expression, authors and open content policies Prof. dr. Mireille M.M. van Eechoud, Institute for Information Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam http://www.openforumeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/OFE-Academic-Paper-Implications-of-
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Five Star Movement Deviate from Its 'Democratic Formula'?
    Innovative Politics: Does The Five Star Movement Deviate from its ‘Democratic Formula’? Anna Grazia Napoletano S4609301 16 November 2017 Comparative Politics Master thesis Supervisor: Dr. Maurits J. Meijers Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen Word count. 33, 759 Table of Contents 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 3 1.1 Innovative politics: from a minimalist concept of democracy to a complex one……….. 8 1.2 Innovative politics: Pirate Party, Geenpeil and the Five Star Movement……………….. 12 2.The Five Star Movement: History and organization……………………………………... 15 2.1 Italian political context:……………………………………………………………… 15 2.2 From a website to a Movement: The Five Star Movement’s embryo stage………….. 18 2.2.1 Anti-media………………………………………………………………………….. 19 2.2.2 Meetup……………………………………………………………………………… 21 2.3 From a Movement to a party…………………………………………………………. 24 2.3.1 Current structure……………………………………………………………………… 27 2.3.2 The Five Star Movement manifesto and its system of checks and balances…………. 28 2.3.3 Staff…………………………………………………………………………………… 30 2.3.4 Financing……………………………………………………………………………… 30 3. Divergence from the Five Star Movement’s Democratic Formula………………………. 31 3.1 The FiveStar Movement democratic formula: direct-participatory, transparent and deliberative………………………………………………………………….. 31 3.2 Direct and Participatory Democracy……………………………………………………. 32 3.3 Transparent Democracy…………………………………………………………………. 35 3.4 Deliberative Democracy………………………………………………………………… 35 3.5 Deviations from the Five Star Movement’s democratic formula……………………….. 36 3.6 Expectations regarding the Five Star Movement’s divergence from its “democratic formula”……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 3.6.1 The massive organization of internal democracy and “the Iron Law of Oligarchy”….… 38 3.6.2.The Lack of ideology: Delegation Vs. Representation and Taggart’s protest politics….. 41 4. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………… 46 4.1 Exploring the world of the Five Star Movement………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Historical Contextualization of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons: the Emergence of a Free Culture Movement
    An Introductory Historical Contextualization of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons: The Emergence of a Free Culture Movement Mayo Fuster Morell Autonomous University of Barcelona Mayo.Fuster@EUI.eu Abstract. Online Creation Communities (OCCs) are a set of individ- uals that communicate, interact and collaborate; in several forms and degrees of participation which are eco-systemically integrated; mainly via a platform of participation on the Internet, on which they depend; and aiming at knowledge-making and sharing. The paper will first pro- vide an historical contextualization OCCs. Then, it will show how the development of OCCs is fuelled by and contributes to, the rise of a free culture movement defending and advocating the creation of digital com- mons, and provide an empirically grounded definition of free culture movement. The empirical analyses is based content analysis of 80 in- terviews to free culture practitioners, promoters and activists with an international background or rooted in Europe, USA and Latino-America and the content analysis of two seminar discussions. The data collection was developed from 2008 to 2010. 1 Introduction Online Creation Communities (OCCs) are a set of individuals that communicate, interact and collaborate; in several forms and degrees of participation which are eco-systemically integrated; mainly via a platform of participation on the In- ternet, on which they depend; and aiming at knowledge-making and sharing (Fuster Morell, 2010). OCCs based on certain governance conditions result on the building of a digital commons. Digital commons are defined as an informa- tion and knowledge resources that are collectively created and owned or shared between or among a community and that tend to be non-exclusivedible, that is, be (generally freely) available to third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic
    Members attending the meeting Member Attendance 2019 fee Austria Not present Paid Croatia Not member anymore - Czech Republic David Paid Estonia Not present Not Paid Finland Not present Paid France Etienne & François Paid Germany Alexander & Gregory Paid Greece Not present Not Paid Iceland Unnar Þór Sæmunds Paid Italy Marco Paid Luxembourg Not present Not Paid Netherlands Ji Yong Paid Norway Linda, William, Raymond Paid Poland Not present Not Paid Romania Not a member anymore - Slovenia Not present Not Paid Catalonia Dario Paid Spain Not present Not Paid Sweden Mattias & Henrik Paid Switzerland Not present present Paid Europe Not present - MEP Not present - Observer membersver members Japan ⽇本海賊党 (PP-JP) Pirate Party of Potsdam (PP-DE) Pirate Party of Bavaria (PP-DE) Pirate Parties International (PPI) Katla Hólm Þórhildardóttir - PPIS will chairing the meeting in the morning, Mikuláš Peksa - PPCZ will do it in the afternoon.CZ will do it in the afternoon. ===================================== Agenda approved Mikulas is presenting now all board activities board Etienne is presenting their Motion https://mattermost.european-pirateparty.eu/files/osrdmq15oids8dywmmp1cpa8qo/public? h=1PdhBHnZy2_PTo25mk9s7wtQD6NnWWcDmdbLGnDPk08n-pirateparty.eu/files/osrdmq15oids8dywmmp1cpa8qo/public? h=1PdhBHnZy2_PTo25mk9s7wtQD6NnWWcDmdbLGnDPk085oids8dywmmp1cpa8qo/public? h=1PdhBHnZy2_PTo25mk9s7wtQD6NnWWcDmdbLGnDPk08n-pirateparty.eu/files/osrdmq15oids8dywmmp1cpa8qo/public? h=1PdhBHnZy2_PTo25mk9s7wtQD6NnWWcDmdbLGnDPk08 After a short break, Mikulas is presenting
    [Show full text]
  • Copyleft – Locandina
    TOWARDS A NEW LEGISLATION ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET PROPOSAL FOR A NEW FRAMEWORK UNDER INFOSOC AND IPRED DIRECTIVES Tuesday, 3rd March 2015, 9:30 to 13:00 Room ASP 1E2 - European Paliament, Brussels Hosted by: Isabella Adinolfi MEP, Italy Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group, M5S © Fulvio Sarzana di S.Ippolito, © Isabella Adinolfi, Lawyer. Sarzana & Partners Law Firm, Rome, Italy MEP, Italy, Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group - MoVimento 5 stelle, Committee on Culture and Education © Marco Ricolfi, (Rapporteur for CULT Committee on the Implementation of InfoSoc Directive) Professor of Commercial law University of Turin, Nexa Center for internet and society, Turin, Italy © Laura Ferrara, MEP, Italy, Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group - MoVimento 5 stelle, © Agustin Reyna, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs & Committee on Legal Affairs Senior Legal Officer and is leading BEUC’s Digital Team, Brussels, Belgium © Dario Tamburrano, © Giuseppe Mazziotti, MEP, Italy, Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group - MoVimento 5 stelle, Professor of Intellectual property Law at Trinity College Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Dublin, Ireland © Julia Reda, © Jörgen Gren, MEP, Germany, Greens/European Free Alliance Group - Pirate Party, Member of Commissioner Andrus Ansip Cabinet, Coordinator for Copyright (t.b.c.) Committee on Legal Affairs (Rapporteur for JURI Committee on the Implementation of InfoSoc Directive) © Innocenzo Genna, Head of Copyright Committee at EUROISPA (Pan European association of European Internet Services Providers Associations ) EVENT WEB - STREAMED © Eleonora Rosati, IT EN FR Lecturer in Intellectual Property (IP) law at the University of Southampton, UK The conference is free upon registration: https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/Copyright_03_03_15 For info email: isabella.adinolfi-office@europarl.europa.eu.
    [Show full text]