Operation Impala

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Impala CCC EXHIBIT Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era FINAL REPORT ALRC Report 123 June 2014 CCC EXHIBIT This Final Report reflects the law as at 30 June 2014 The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 (Cth) and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 40 MLC Centre, 19 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia. Postal Address: GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International: +61 2 8238 6333 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International: +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.alrc.gov.au ALRC publications are available to view or download free of charge on the ALRC website: www.alrc.gov.au/publications. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. ISBN: 978-0-9924069-1-2 Commission Reference: ALRC Final Report 123, 2014 © Commonwealth of Australia 2014 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the ALRC. Printed by Ligare Pty Ltd CCC EXHIBIT The Hon George Brandis QC MP Attorney-General of Australia Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 30 June 2014 Dear Attorney-General ALRC Terms of Reference—Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era On 12 June 2013, the Australian Law Reform Commission received Terms of Reference to undertake a review into Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era. On behalf of the Members of the Commission involved in this Inquiry, and in accordance with the Auustralian Law Reform Commission Act 1996, I am pleased to present you with the Final Report on this reference, Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era. Yours sincerely, Professor Rosalind Croucher Professor Barbara McDonald President Commissioner in Charge CCC EXHIBIT CCC EXHIBIT Contents Terms of Reference 5 Participants 7 Recommendations 9 Part 1 15 1. Introduction 17 Context of the Inquiry 17 The design of a cause of action 18 Should a new tort be enacted? 20 Other reforms 26 The law reform process 27 2. Guiding Principles 29 Summary 29 Principle 1: Privacy is a fundamental value worthy of legal protection 30 Principle 2: There is a public interest in protecting privacy 32 Principle 3: Privacy should be balanced with other important interests 33 Principle 4: Australian privacy laws should meet international standards 35 Principle 5: Privacy laws should be adaptable to technological change 36 Principle 6: Privacy laws should be clear and certain 36 Principle 7: Privacy laws should be coherent and consistent 37 Principle 8: Justice to protect privacy should be accessible 38 Principle 9: Privacy protection is an issue of shared responsibility 39 3. Overview of Current Law 41 Summary 41 Existing legislative privacy protection 42 Existing common law causes of action 47 Filling the gaps in existing law 51 A common law action for breach of privacy in Australia? 53 Part 2 57 4. A New Tort in a New Commonwealth Act 59 Summary 59 A new stand-alone Commonwealth Act 59 Constitutional issues 62 An action in tort 67 Abolition of common law actions 72 CCC EXHIBIT 2 Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era 5. Two Types of Invasion 73 Summary 73 A cause of action for two types of invasion of privacy 74 Intrusion upon seclusion 76 Misuse of private information 81 Examples 85 False light and appropriation 87 An open-ended action? 88 One cause of action, not two 89 6. Reasonable Expectation of Privacy 91 Summary 91 A test for what is private 92 Considerations 96 7. Fault 109 Summary 109 Intentional or reckless invasions of privacy 110 Negligence 118 Strict liability 124 Effect of apology on liability 128 8. Seriousness and Proof of Damage 131 Summary 131 Seriousness 132 Proof of damage not required 138 9. Balancing Privacy with Other Interests 143 Summary 143 The balancing exercise 144 Public interest matters 150 Onus of proof 158 A discrete exercise 161 10. Forums, Limitations and Other Matters 163 Summary 163 Forums 164 Alternative dispute resolution processes 168 Cause of action limited to natural persons 171 Non-survival of the cause of action 172 Limitation periods 177 Young plaintiffs 181 First publication rule 182 11. Defences and Exemptions 185 Summary 185 Lawful authority 186 Incidental to the exercise of a lawful right of defence of persons or property 191 Necessity 193 CCC EXHIBIT Contents 3 Consent 195 Absolute privilege 202 Publication of public documents 204 Fair report of proceedings of public concern 205 Safe harbour scheme for internet intermediaries 207 Exemption or defence for children and young persons 210 Defences unsuited to a privacy action 213 12. Remedies and Costs 219 Summary 219 Damages 220 Account of profits 238 No recommendation on notional licence fee 240 Injunctions 241 Delivery up, destruction or removal of material 251 Correction orders 252 Apology orders 254 Declarations 256 Costs 258 Part 3 261 13. Breach of Confidence Actions for Misuse of Private Information 263 Summary 263 The likely future development of the action for breach of confidence 264 Compensation for emotional distress 265 Public interest and injunction applications 273 14. Surveillance Devices 275 Summary 275 Existing surveillance device laws 276 A Commonwealth Act 278 Technology neutral surveillance legislation 282 Telecommunications surveillance 285 Participant monitoring 286 Responsible journalism and the public interest 289 Workplace surveillance 293 Remedial relief and compensation 295 Alternative forums for complaints about surveillance 296 15. Harassment 299 Summary 299 Statutory tort of harassment 300 Criminal offences for harassment 304 Harassment laws in other countries 307 CCC EXHIBIT 4 Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era 16. New Regulatory Mechanisms 309 Summary 309 Privacy Commissioner investigations for serious invasions of privacy 310 Amicus curiae and intervener functions 317 Deletion of personal information 319 Review of the small business exemption 321 Consultations 323 Abbreviations 327 CCC EXHIBIT Terms of Reference SERIOUS INVASIONS OF PRIVACY IN THE DIGITAL ERA I, Mark Dreyfus QC MP, Attorney-General of Australia, having regard to: • the extent and application of existing privacy statutes • the rapid growth in capabilities and use of information, surveillance and communication technologies • community perceptions of privacy • relevant international standards and the desirability of consistency in laws affecting national and transnational dataflows. REFER to the Australian Law Reform Commission for inquiry and report, pursuant to s 20(1) of the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth), the issue of prevention of and remedies for serious invasions of privacy in the digital era. Scope of the reference The ALRC should make recommendations regarding: 1. Innovative ways in which law may reduce serious invasions of privacy in the digital era. 2. The necessity of balancing the value of privacy with other fundamental values including freedom of expression and open justice. 3. The detailed legal design of a statutory cause of action for serious invasions of privacy, including not limited to: a. legal thresholds b. the effect of the implied freedom of political communication c. jurisdiction d. fault elements e. proof of damages f. defences g. exemptions h. whether there should be a maximum award of damages i. whether there should be a limitation period CCC EXHIBIT 6 Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era j. whether the cause of action should be restricted to natural and living persons k. whether any common law causes of action should be abolished l. access to justice m. the availability of other court ordered remedies. 4. The nature and appropriateness of any other legal remedies for redress for serious invasions of privacy. The Commission should take into account the For Your Information ALRC Report (2008), relevant New South Wales and Victorian Law Reform Commission privacy reports, the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012 and relevant Commonwealth, State, Territory legislation, international law and case law. Consultation In undertaking this reference, the Commission will identify and consult relevant stakeholders including the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, and relevant State and Territory bodies. Timeframe The ALRC will provide its final report to the Attorney-General by June 2014. 12 June 2013 Mark Dreyfus Attorney-General CCC EXHIBIT Participants Australian Law Reform Commission President Professor Rosalind Croucher Commissioner in Charge Professor Barbara McDonald Part-time Commissioner The Hon Justice John Middleton, Federal Court of Australia Executive Director Sabina Wynn Senior Legal Officer Jared Boorer Legal Officers Dr Julie Mackenzie Brigit Morris Dr Steven Robertson Legal Interns Claire Bready Ravi Gosal Georgie Leahy Alisha Mathew Timothy Maybury Michelle Meares Jack Murray Hagen Sporleder Jackson Wherrett Bradley Woods CCC EXHIBIT 8 Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era Advisory Committee Members The Hon Justice Peter D Applegarth, Supreme Court of Queensland Richard Coleman, Fairfax Media Limited Professor Graham Greenleaf, Professor of Law & Information Systems, University of New South Wales Anna Johnston, Director, Salinger Privacy Peter Leonard, Partner, Gilbert & Tobin The Hon W H Nicholas
Recommended publications
  • Free Speech 2014 Symposium Thursday, 7 August 2014 Aerial Function Centre, Sydney
    Free Speech 2014 symposium Thursday, 7 August 2014 Aerial Function Centre, Sydney Starts Ends Theme Format Topic Speakers 08.00 08.50 Registrations 08.50 09.00 Speech Attendees asked to be seated Conference Chair: Jana Wendt 09.00 09.10 Presentation Welcome to country Aunty Norma Ingram - Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council 09.10 09.20 Speech Introductory remarks Professor Gillian Triggs - President, Australian Human Rights Commission Opening session 09.20 09.50 Keynote address Free speech reflections Senator the Hon George Brandis QC - Attorney-General 09.50 10.10 Speech Free speech stocktake Tim Wilson - Australian Human Rights Commissioner 10.10 10.30 Speech ALRC Inquiry into Freedoms Professor Rosalind Croucher - President, Australian Law Reform Commission 10.30 10.50 Morning tea Free speech in a liberal democracy Chris Berg - Director of Policy, Institute of Public Affairs Accommodating rights Speeches & Does defamation law deserve ridicule? Dr Roy Baker - Macquarie School of Law 10.50 11.55 (Session 1) questions Vilification laws Dr Augusto Zimmermann - School of Law, Murdoch University The commercial environment Dr Kesten Green - University of South Australia Business School Combating online harassment Dr Monika Bickert - Head of Global Content Policy, Facebook Free speech in the digital Speeches & 11.55 12.50 Reforming intellectual property Trish Hepworth - Australian Digital Alliance age questions Free speech & the internet Professor Julian Thomas - Swinburne Institute for Social Research 12.50 13.30 Lunch Dr Gary Johns
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Read More
    ALRC 2009–10 R E P O R T 113 ANNUAL REPORT Requests and inquiries regarding this report should be addressed to: The Executive Director Australian Law Reform Commission GPO Box 3708 Sydney NSW 2001 Telephone: (02) 8238 6333 Fax: (02) 8238 6363 Email: [email protected] This report is also accessible online at: www.alrc.gov.au ISBN 978-0-9807194-3-7 Print Post Approval Number: PP255003/02228 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600. Alternatively, an online request form is available at <www. ag.gov.au/cca>. Printed by Union Offset Printers ii Professor David Weisbrot AM ProfessorProfessor Rosalind David WeisbrotF Croucher AM PresPresidentident President The Honourable Robert McClelland MP The Honourable Philip Ruddock MP TheAttorney-General Honourable Philip Ruddock MP Attorney-General Attorney-GeneralParliament House Parliament House Parliament House CanberraCanberra ACT ACT 2600 2600 Canberra ACT 2600 2219 OctoberSeptember 2007 2010 19 October 2007 Dear Attorney-General Dear Attorney-General Dear Attorney-General On behalf of the members of the Australian Law Reform Commission, I am pleased to present the On behalf of the members of the Australian Law Reform Commission, I am pleased to present the Annual Report of the Australian Law Reform Commission for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June Annual Report of the Australian Law Reform Commission for the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Law Special Edition
    LAW INSTITUTE JOURNAL INSTITUTE LAW OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY | LEGAL FIRMS | EMPLOYMENT STATUS | WAGES | FAIR WORK ACT | EMPLOYEE PROTECTION MAY 2021 MAY 2021 WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION WHY THE LAW SHOULD ALLOW FOR COMPULSORY TESTING IN A PANDEMIC WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION • VACCINATION GUIDE • LEGAL FIRMS • EMPLOYMENT STATUS • WAGES • FAIR WORK ACT • EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION COVID-19 • BUSINESS POST-LOCKDOWN www.liv.asn.au/LIJ www.liv.asn.au/LIJ • ZOOMING INTO NEW JOBS HEALTH AND WELLBEING PP100007900 ISSN 0023-9267 PP100007900 ISSN 0023-9267 ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE RRP $20 95.5 Successful law firms are agile Whether you’re at home or back in the office, LEAP lets you work with flexibility. On the go In the office In court At home leap.com.au/agile-law-firms Contents May 2021 WORKPLACE LAW SPECIAL EDITION FROM PAGE 22 Vaccination guide Legal firms Employment status Wages Fair Work Act Employment protection Law firms after COVID-19 How firms have adapted By Karin Derkley PAGE 11 Zooming into new jobs The challenge of starting a new role during the pandemic By Karin Derkley PAGE 15 Health and wellbeing Accentuate the positive By Megan Fulford PAGE 87 ADOBE STOCK MAY 2021 LAW INSTITUTE JOURNAL 1 Contents May 2021 workplace law special edition Protect the best interests FEATURES NEWS EVERY ISSUE 4 Contributors OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY FIRMS 6 From the president Law firms after COVID-19 of your clients with 22 A shot in the arm 11 8 Unsolicited A COVID-19 vaccine has arrived but the The pandemic dealt an initial blow COURTS & PARLIAMENT pandemic's twists and turns are not over yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Freedom of Speech and Part IIA of the Racial
    Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights Inquiry report Freedom of speech in Australia Inquiry into the operation of Part IIA of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and related procedures under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) 28 February 2017 © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 ISBN 978-1-76010-526-6 PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3823 Fax: 02 6277 5767 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.aph.gov.au/joint_humanrights/ This document was prepared by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. ii Membership of the committee Members Mr Ian Goodenough MP, Chair Moore, Western Australia, LP Mr Graham Perrett MP, Deputy Chair Moreton, Queensland, ALP Mr Russell Broadbent MP McMillan, Victoria, LP Senator Carol Brown Tasmania, ALP Senator Richard Di Natale (12.12.16) Victoria, AG Senator Sarah Hanson-Young (2.2.17) South Australia, AG Ms Madeleine King MP Brand, Western Australia, ALP Mr Julian Leeser MP Berowra, New South Wales, LP Senator Nick McKim Tasmania, AG Senator Claire Moore Queensland, ALP Senator James Paterson Victoria, LP Senator Linda Reynolds CSC Western Australia, LP Senator Rachel Siewert (3.2.17) Western Australia, AG Secretariat Ms Toni Dawes, Committee Secretary Ms Zoe Hutchinson, Principal Research Officer Ms Nicola Knackstredt, Principal Research Officer Mr Tasman Larnach, Principal Research Officer Mr Glenn Ryall, Principal Research Officer Ms Jessica Strout, Principal Research Officer Ms Eloise Menzies, Senior Research Officer Mr Josh See, Senior Research Officer Ms Morana Kavgic, Legislative Research Officer Ms Alice Petrie, Legislative Research Officer iii Table of contents Membership of the committee ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JC 4 Draft Program 18 August
    Justice Connections 4 PROGRAM Opening Session: 9:15-9:45 Dr Andrew Leigh MP 9:45- 10:15 – Rosalind Croucher AM and Simon Rice OAM Institutional Law Reform and Justice In 2015 the Australian Law Reform Commission celebrates 40 years of institutional law reform in Australia. This session will focus upon the contribution that an independent law reform commission can have towards justice—as an idea and in practice. After a critical account of the politics and practice of institutional law reform, the distinct role of the ALRC will be considered in the context of the many sites in which law reform happens and its impact assessed through a broad lens. The presenters will provide a dialogue around these key themes. MORNING TEA 10:15-10:45 Session 1: Justice and Violence chaired by Prof Rosalind Croucher AM 1. 10:55-11:05 – Allison Ballard and Patricia Easteal National Anti-Bullying Jurisdiction: The Mouse that Roared? The anti-bullying amendments the Fair Work Act 2014 (Cth) came into effect on 1 January 2014. There are indications that these changes are not translating into anti- bullying Orders. In the first six months of 343 applications, only one Order made. In this paper we look further to determine whether the legislation is in effect a paper tiger by examining the outcomes of the first 18 months. In addition to outcome we analyse decision-making and conclude that the scope of the provisions has been narrowed. For example, the FWC has confirmed that applications cannot be made by state government employees and will not be considered where an employee no longer works for the relevant employer.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTORNEY-GENERAL HON ROBERT Mcclelland MP
    ATTORNEY-GENERAL HON ROBERT McCLELLAND MP MEDIA RELEASE 15 December 200 9 APPOINTMENT OF PRESIDENT OF THE AUSTRALIAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION Attorney -General, Robert McClelland , today announced the appointment of Professor Rosalind Croucher as the President of the Australian Law Reform Commission. “I congra tulate Professor Croucher on her appointment and look forward to her leading Australia's foremost law reform institution” Mr McClelland said. Professor Croucher has been a member of the Australian Law Reform Commission since 2007 and has had a distinguish ed career in University teaching and management over 25 years, most recently as Dean of Law at Macquarie University since 1999. “I would also like to acknowledge the exempl ary work and leadership of the outgoing President of the Commission, Emeritus Pr ofessor David Weisbrot AM, over more than 10 years .” “As the Government works to improve access to justice and identify innovative solutions to emerging issues , I am confident that the Australian Law Reform Commission, under the leadership of Professor C roucher , will continue to make a significant contribution in efforts to simplify and modernise the law. ” A short biography of Professor Croucher is attached . Media Contact: Adam Siddique 0407 473 630 Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600 • Telephone (02) 6277 7300 • Fax (02) 6273 4102 www.attorneygeneral.gov.au Professor R osalind Croucher Professor Rosalind Croucher was appointed to the Australian Law Reform Commission in 2007, joining the Commission after a distinguished period of 25 years in University teaching and management, most recently as Dean of Law at Macquarie U niversity (from 1999). Prior to this, she was a member of the Law Faculties of the University of Sydney and the University of New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrecy Laws and Open Government in Australia
    Secrecy Laws and Open Government in Australia REPORT REPORT 112 December 2009 This Report reflects the law as at 11 November 2009 © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in whole or part, subject to acknowledgement of the source, for your personal, non- commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. Requests for further authorisation should be directed by letter to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or electronically via www.ag.gov.au/cca. ISBN- 978-0-9807194-0-6 Commission Reference: ALRC Report 112 The Australian Law Reform Commission was established on 1 January 1975 by the Law Reform Commission Act 1973 (Cth) and reconstituted by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). The office of the ALRC is at Level 25, 135 King Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia. All ALRC publications can be made available in a range of accessible formats for people with disabilities. If you require assistance, please contact the ALRC. Telephone: within Australia (02) 8238 6333 International +61 2 8238 6333 TTY: (02) 8238 6379 Facsimile: within Australia (02) 8238 6363 International +61 2 8238 6363 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.alrc.gov.au Printed by Ligare The Hon Robert McClelland MP Attorney-General of Australia Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 11 December 2009 Dear Attorney-General Review of Secrecy Laws On 5 August 2008, you issued terms of reference for the ALRC to undertake a comprehensive review of secrecy laws and related issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Conference in Very Good Heart
    ILA 2018 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA 78TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION HOSTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION – AUSTRALIAN BRANCH 19-24 AUGUST 2018 Developing International Law in Challenging Times CONFERENCE PROGRAM #ILAConference2018 • Facebook: @ILAConference2018 • Twitter: @ILA_Australia ILA 2018 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA 2 ILA CONFERENCE 2018 • www.ila2018.org.au ILA 2018 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA Welcome Message from the Chair of the International Law Association The Right Hon the Lord Mance Welcome to the 78th Biennial Conference of the International Law Association! The Australian Branch, presided over by Dr Christopher Ward SC, presents to us in this programme a rich feast of subjects, speeches and sessions, inter-mixed with reports from ILA committee and study group work, and book-ended by opening and closing ceremonies and evening events. As chair of the International Law Association’s Executive Council, I congratulate the Branch on the conference’s variety, scope and quality. It is an indication of the relevance attached to international law in domestic courts, as well as a great pleasure, that the conference will be opened by the Chief Justice of Australia, The Hon Susan Kiefel AC, and that our keynote speakers include The Hon James Allsop AC, Chief Justice of the Federal Court, and The Hon Michael Kirby AC CMG, formerly of the High Court. The topicality of the conference sessions is clear. Cite merely some, they include: climate change, the environment and health, gender issues, indigenous peoples, outer space, refugees, modern slavery, new technology, use of force, law of the sea, international trade and investment, international dispute resolution, public interest engagement, international criminal law, enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Law Journal
    MACQUARIE LAW SCHOOL Faculty of Arts Macquarie Law Journal VOLUME 18, 2018 ELDER ABUSE LEGAL, REGULATORY AND POLICY CHALLENGES The Macquarie Law Journal is currently published annually and is available exclusively online on an open access basis. Editions of the journal may be general editions or focused on a theme chosen by the Editor. The journal welcomes all contributions, and is especially interested in contributions of an interdisciplinary character. Articles should be between 8 000 and 10 000 words in length, while shorter papers between 4 000 and 6 000 words may also be published. Case notes, reports on recent developments and book reviews should be approximately 1 500–2 000 words in length. References and footnotes are not included in the above word counts. All articles and shorter papers submitted for consideration are subject to a formal process of peer review by at least two academic referees with expertise in the relevant field. All manuscripts should be submitted in Microsoft Word format only as email attachments addressed to The Editor, Macquarie Law Journal at [email protected]. Manuscripts must be accompanied by a separate abstract of approximately 200 words together with a very short author biography. The format for referencing must comply with the style outlined in the most recent edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation. Submitted manuscripts should contain original unpublished material and are not to be under simultaneous consideration for publication elsewhere. Editorial communications should be addressed
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Technology Issues Paper
    Human Rights and Technology Issues Paper JULY 2018 ABN 47 996 232 602 Level 3, 175 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 General enquiries 1300 369 711 Complaints info line 1300 656 419 TTY 1800 620 241 Australian Human Rights Commission www.humanrights.gov.au tech.humanrights.gov.au © Australian Human Rights Commission 2018. Acknowledgments The Australian Human Rights Commission encourages the The Human Rights Commissioner Edward Santow thanks dissemination and exchange of information presented in this President Rosalind Croucher, Sex Discrimination Commissioner publication and endorses the use of the Australian Governments Kate Jenkins, Disability Discrimination Commissioner Alastair Open Access and Licensing Framework (AusGOAL). McEwin, National Children’s Rights Commissioner Megan Mitchell and Age Discrimination Commissioner Kay Patterson for their contribution to this Paper. The Human Rights and Technology Issues Paper 2018 was drafted by Edward Santow, Sophie Farthing, Zoe Paleologos and Lisa Webber Corr. All material presented in this publication is licensed under the The Commission thanks and acknowledges: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence, with the exception of: • Staff of the Australian Human Rights Commission: Darren Dick, John Howell, Katerina Lecchi, Si Qi Wen, Lauren Perry • photographs and images; and Lucy Morgan. • the Commission’s logo, any branding or trademarks; • where otherwise indicated. • Expert Reference Group for their peer review and advice in the preparation of this Paper: Amanda Alford, The Honourable To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ Justice Margaret Beazley AO, Professor Genevieve Bell, Peter licenses/by/4.0/legalcode Dunne, Dr Tobias Feakin, Dr Alan Finkel AO, Verity Firth, Peter Leonard, Brooke Massender, Sean Murphy, Professor Toby In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Walsh and Myfanwy Wallwork.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTA News January 2007
    ATTA News January 2007 http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/atta/newsletter.htm Editor: Colin Fong, School of Law, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney [email protected] ATTA website http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/atta Contents 1 Presidential column 1 2 ATTA 2007 conference 1 3 ATTA AGM Agenda Items 2007 Conference 2 4 Arrivals, departures and honours 3 5 ATTA 20 years young 4 6 Vacancies 4 7 Tax Office alumni network 5 8 Asia-Pacific Business Regulation Group 5 9 Free UK statutes 6 10 Tax, Accounting, Economics and Law Related Meetings 6 11 Recent publications 10 12 Quotable quotes 12 1 Presidential column Dear All, As I am in holiday mode I have not much to say other than I am really looking forward to the upcoming conference and hope to see you all there. Cheers Paul 2 ATTA 2007 conference The TC Beirne School of Law at the University of Queensland is pleased to be hosting the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association from the 22nd– 24th January 2007. All details for the event are available on our ATTA Conference website: http://www.law.uq.edu.au/attaconference For any further information please contact the Law School Research Office staff Trisha Barbour ([email protected]) or Teola Marsh ([email protected]) Registration There are various registration options available for the conference including individual day and session attendance. For full details please visit the registration page of the conference website: (http://www.law.uq.edu.au/attaconference/registration.php) We look forward to seeing everyone next week.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractured Families, Fragmented Responsibilities – Responding to Family Violence in a Federal System I Introduction
    854 UNSW Law Journal Volume 33(3) FRACTURED FAMILIES, FRAGMENTED RESPONSIBILITIES – RESPONDING TO FAMILY VIOLENCE IN A FEDERAL SYSTEM HILARY ASTOR∗ AND ROSALIND CROUCHER∗∗ I INTRODUCTION Family law has transformed over the past 200 years from an essentially private space to a public one. Once it was the province of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction with respect to relations between husbands and wives, and the province of the common law and equity for questions of title and legitimacy of children with respect to real estate. Professor Stephen Parker remarked that: The idea that we should distinguish between public and private spheres of life has been a central one in liberal political philosophy since the seventeenth century, although the roots of the idea can be traced back to Aristotle. In classical liberalism, the notion of a private sphere was a crucial part of the belief in limited government. There were certain parts of civil society in which the state had no business. And at the epicentre of the private sphere was the family; more specifically, the patriarchal family.1 The idea that the family is a ‘private’ space has been a continuing theme in law – and especially family law.2 One of the effects of the family as a private space outside the province of law was to conceal violence, to create resistance to taking violence into account in legislation.3 ∗ Commissioner, New South Wales Law Reform Commission; Emeritus Professor, University of Sydney. ∗∗ President, Australian Law Reform Commission; Professor of Law, Macquarie University (on leave for the duration of the appointment at the ALRC).
    [Show full text]