Bath's 'Foundered Strata' - a Re-Interpretation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bath's 'Foundered Strata' - a Re-Interpretation Bath's 'foundered strata' - a re-interpretation Physical Hazards Programme Research Report OR/08/052 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PHYSICAL HAZARDS PROGRAMME RESEARCH REPORT OR/08/052 Bath's 'foundered strata' – a re-interpretation P.R.N. Hobbs and G.O. Jenkins The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used Contributor with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. A. Forster Ordnance Survey licence number Licence No:100017897/2004. Keywords Bath, landslides, cambering, foundering, geohazards, slope stability, mass movement. Front cover Cover picture details, delete if no cover picture. Bibliographical reference P.R.N. HOBBS AND G.O. JENKINS. 2008 Bath's 'foundered strata' - a re-interpretation. British Geological Survey Research Report, OR/08/052. 40pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected] You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2008. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2008 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey offices Sales Desks at Nottingham, Edinburgh and London; see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 3488 e-mail: [email protected] The Survey publishes an annual catalogue of its maps and other www.bgs.ac.uk publications; this catalogue is available from any of the BGS Sales Shop online at: www.geologyshop.com Desks. The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency 0131-667 1000 Fax 0131-668 2683 service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the e-mail: [email protected] surrounding continental shelf, as well as its basic research projects. It also undertakes programmes of British technical aid in geology in developing countries as arranged by the Department London Information Office at the Natural History Museum for International Development and other agencies. (Earth Galleries), Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London The British Geological Survey is a component body of the Natural SW7 2DE Environment Research Council. 020-7589 4090 Fax 020-7584 8270 020-7942 5344/45 email: [email protected] Forde House, Park Five Business Centre, Harrier Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon EX2 7HU 01392-445271 Fax 01392-445371 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, 20 College Gardens, Belfast BT9 6BS 028-9066 6595 Fax 028-9066 2835 Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB 01491-838800 Fax 01491-692345 Sophia House, 28 Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9LJ 029–2066 0147 Fax 029–2066 0159 Parent Body Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, Wiltshire SN2 1EU 01793-411500 Fax 01793-411501 www.nerc.ac.uk OR/08/052; Draft 2.0 Last modified: 2008/08/11 14:09 Foreword This report is the published product of a study by the British Geological Survey (BGS) … … Acknowledgements A large number of individuals have contributed to the project. This assistance has been received at all stages of the study. In addition to the collection of data, many individuals have freely given their advice, and provided local knowledge. The authors would particularly like to thank the following: R. A. Ellison R. J. Wyatt A. Gibson M. Harrison K. Royse i OR/08/052; Draft 2.0 Last modified: 2008/08/11 14:09 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... i Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Summary ........................................................................................................................................ v 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 Geology .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Forest Marble Formation ................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Chalfield Oolite Formation ............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Fuller’s Earth Formation ................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Salperton Limestone Formation ..................................................................................... 6 2.5 Bridport Sand Formation ................................................................................................ 7 2.6 Dyrham Formation .......................................................................................................... 7 2.7 Charmouth Mudstone Formation .................................................................................... 8 2.8 Blue Lias Formation ....................................................................................................... 8 3 Mass movement ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Cambering ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Cambering of the Great Oolite .................................................................................. 13 3.1.2 Cambering of the inferior oolite ................................................................................ 14 3.1.3 Substrate mobility ..................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Gull caves ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.3 Landslides ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.3.1 Upper slopes ................................................................................................................ 3 3.3.2 Lower slopes ............................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Landslide map ................................................................................................................. 9 3.4.1 Landslide ................................................................................................................... 10 3.4.2 Cambering ................................................................................................................. 10 3.4.3 Other features ............................................................................................................ 11 4 Remote sensing ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Aerial photographs ........................................................................................................ 12 4.2 Airborne radar (NextMap) ............................................................................................ 12 4.3 Airborne LiDAR & PSINSAR ..................................................................................... 13 4.4 Terrestrial LiDAR (laser scanning) .............................................................................. 13 5 Field Investigations .............................................................................................................. 14 5.1 Toghill Farm ................................................................................................................. 14 5.2 Terrestrial laser scanning .............................................................................................. 17 ii OR/08/052; Draft 2.0 Last modified: 2008/08/11 14:09 Appendix 1 Major recorded landslides in the Bath area ..................................................... 1 Appendix 2 ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Glossary ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. References ...................................................................................................................................... 6 FIGURES Figure 1 Part of BGS 1:50, 000 scale ‘solid & drift’ geology map – Bath (265) ........................... 2 Figure 2 Extract from R. Wyatt’s map depicting landsliding and cambering (Forster et al., 1985) .................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Quarter 7 Duplicate Removal Process
    Quarter 7 Duplicate Removal Process Guidance Total number of records submitted via the web tool (ie Stroke / All records (of any diagnosis) for patients who arrived at hospital TIA / Other) between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013 which were locked on the SINAP web tool by 21 January 2013. Number of stroke records submitted via the web tool As above, except that stroke was the diagnosis (as opposed to TIA/Other). Total number of records after cleaning (ie duplicate removals) Records assumed to be duplicates are those that have all of the following fields identical: hospital, date of patient arrival at hospital, gender, age and diagnosis. This may mean that some records that were not real duplicates are removed, but this is proportionally only a small number of those removed, whereas the vast majority will be duplicates. This has been identified as the most appropriate method for removing duplicate records. Percentage of records submitted included after cleaning The percentage represents the proportion of records included in the quarter 7 report after the data cleaning process, this is listed below as total records and stroke records. Total Percentage Percentage Stroke Stroke Total number of number of of stroke of all records records records records submitted records records submitted submitted included SHA Trust Hospital via the webtool in included submitted included in via the after Quarter 7 after included in Quarter 7 webtool in cleaning (Stroke/TIA/Other) cleaning Quarter 7 Report Quarter 7 Quarter 7 Quarter 7 Report East Chesterfield
    [Show full text]
  • SCUDAMORE FAMILIES of WELLOW, BATH and FROME, SOMERSET, from 1440
    Skydmore/ Scudamore Families of Wellow, Bath & Frome, Somerset, from 1440 Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study 2015 www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com [email protected] SKYDMORE/ SCUDAMORE FAMILIES OF WELLOW, BATH AND FROME, SOMERSET, from 1440. edited by Linda Moffatt ©2016, from the original work of Warren Skidmore. Revised July 2017. Preface I have combined work by Warren Skidmore from two sources in the production of this paper. Much of the content was originally published in book form as part of Thirty Generations of The Scudamore/Skidmore Family in England and America by Warren Skidmore, and revised and sold on CD in 2006. The material from this CD has now been transferred to the website of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study at www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com. Warren Skidmore produced in 2013 his Occasional Paper No. 46 Scudamore Descendants of certain Younger Sons that came out of Upton Scudamore, Wiltshire. In this paper he sets out the considerable circumstantial evidence for the origin of the Scudamores later found at Wellow, Somerset, as being Bratton Clovelly, Devon. Interested readers should consult in particular Section 5 of this, Warren’s last Occasional Paper, at the same website. The original text used by Warren Skidmore has been retained here, apart from the following. • Code numbers have been assigned to each male head of household, allowing cross-reference to other information in the databases of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study. Male heads of household in this piece have a code number prefixed WLW to denote their origin at Wellow. • In line with the policy of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study, details of individuals born within approximately the last 100 years are not placed on the Internet without express permission of descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval Dykes (400 to 850 Ad)
    EARLY MEDIEVAL DYKES (400 TO 850 AD) A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Erik Grigg School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents Table of figures ................................................................................................ 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Declaration ...................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................. 10 1.1 The history of dyke studies ................................................................. 13 1.2 The methodology used to analyse dykes ............................................ 26 2 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DYKES ............................................. 36 2.1 Identification and classification ........................................................... 37 2.2 Tables ................................................................................................. 39 2.3 Probable early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 42 2.4 Possible early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 48 2.5 Probable rebuilt prehistoric or Roman dykes ...................................... 51 2.6 Probable reused prehistoric
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Brown's Folly Nature Reserve
    Brown’s Folly Nature Reserve A unique place to explore... A Nature Journal brought to you by Photo Ann Power Ann Photo BrownsBROWNS_FOLLY_A5_32pp_59203 Folly_booklet.indd 1 1 15/08/201215/8/12 17:53:16 16:41 What makes Brown’s Folly Nature Reserve so unique? Welcome Brown’s Folly NR was the first site purchased by Designated as an SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Avon Wildlife Trust when the Trust formed in 1980. Interest), Brown’s Folly Nature Reserve is a unique This 40 hectare site is home to a range of wildlife that site for wildlife and geology located on the edge of depend on the unique limestone grasslands, ancient Bathford and Monkton Farleigh, near Bath. woodlands and cave systems within the reserve. This booklet is a guide to the reserve, helping you Contents Ancient woodlands to explore what it has to offer all year round and is What makes Brown’s Folly packed with outdoor activities. NR so unique? ....................2 Wild thyme, harebell and several species of orchid How to get there Welcome ................................3 cover the old spoil heaps from the mines. History ....................................4 Caves and exposed limestone Bathford Bats at Brown’s Folly .......6 The geology of the site is of national importance, with 2 exposed limestone rock at several places throughout Spring .....................................8 3 Prospect the reserve. Place Summer .............................. 12 Brown’s Folly Autumn ............................... 16 Monkton Located on the lower slopes of the reserve these Farleigh N Winter .................................. 20 woodlands are more than 100 years old with a 0 100m 500m diverse mix of tree species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacman TEMPLATE
    Updated May 2020 National Cardiac Arrest Audit Participating Hospitals The total number of hospitals signed up to participate in NCAA is 194. England Birmingham and Black Country Participant Alexandra Hospital Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Birmingham Heartlands Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust City Hospital Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust Good Hope Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Hereford County Hospital Wye Valley NHS Trust Manor Hospital Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust New Cross Hospital The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Russells Hall Hospital The Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust Sandwell General Hospital Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust Solihull Hospital University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Worcestershire Royal Hospital Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust Central England Participant George Eliot Hospital George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust Glenfield Hospital University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Kettering General Hospital Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Leicester General Hospital University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester Royal Infirmary University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Northampton General Hospital Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust Hospital of St Cross, Rugby University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust University Hospital Coventry University Hospitals Coventry
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No 30
    NEWSLETTER 30 May 1996 GROUP NEWS ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING. 11 April 1996 1. Apologies for absence came from Amanda Berry, Philippa and Michael Bishop, Brenda and Angus Buchanan, Gwen Davis, Kirsten Elliott, Andrew Ellis, Lutz Haber, Ruth Hayden, Brian Howard, Marta Inskip, Marek Lewcun, Michael Rowe and John Wroughton. 2. The minutes of the A.G.M. of 13 April 1995 were accepted. 3. The Chairman, John Ede, recalled another rewarding year of meetings and pointed to the impressive range of topics covered during the Group's ten-year history. He noted as well that, provided members renew their subscriptions promptly, they still obtain their membership at no greater cost than when the Group was first founded. 4. The bibliography of publications on Bath, 1911-95, compiled by the HBRG in connection with the Bristol Historical Databases Project, approaches the time of its issue on disk and in print-out. Broad subject categories for organizing the entries have now been agreed. Certain types of publication have been excluded, as well as many slighter items, but the list should still be a valuable aid. HBRG members are asked to report any significant publications missing from the first edition as soon as it becomes available. 5. The Secretary had written to the new Chief Executive of B&NES expressing concern about the future of documentary sources for Bath and asking for details of the new administrative structure for local libraries, city museums, the Bath Record Office and archological services and also the policy with regard to the Somerset Record Office. From the reply it is clear that much still remains undecided and that it is imperative the HBRG keeps a close watching brief on this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernie, Probus, Newlyn, Saint Allen, Truro, the Borough of Truro, Saint
    6617 Ernie, Probus, Newlyn, Saint Allen, Truro, the near the town of Bridgwater, in the same county, borough of Truro, Saint Clement Trufo, Saint and passing from, through, or into the several Mary Truro, Kenwyn, Kea, Tregavethan, Saint parishes, townships, townlands, and extra-parochial Feock, Gweunap, Perranarworthal, Gluvias other- and other places of Saint John the Baptist Glas^ wise Saint Gluvias, Mylor, Stithians, Mabe, Pen- tonbury, Street, Walton, Ashcott, King's Sedge'- ryn, the borough of Penryn, Budock, Falmouth, moor, Butleigh, Greinton otherwise Grenton, the borough of Falmouth, or some of them in the Pedwell, Shapwick, Moorlinch, Sutton Mallett, county of Cornwall, Stawell, Catcott, Edington Chilton Super Polden, Fourth, a railway diverging from and out of the Cossington, Woolavington, Puriton, Bawdrip, intended railway last above described at, in, or Bradney, Chedzoy, Weston Zoyland, North Pe- near the borough of Truro, in the county of Corn- therton, Chilton Trinity, Wembdon, Bridgwater, wall, aud terminating at, in, or near the borough of Horsey, Dnnwear, Heygrove, East Bower, the Penzance,, in the parish of Madron, in the county borough of Bridgwater, or some of them, in the of Cornwall, and passing from, through, or iuto the county of Somerset. several parishes, townships, townlands, and extra- And notice is hereby further given, than plans parochial and other places of Saint Mary Truro, and sections describing the lines, levels, and situa- Saint Clement Truro, Kenwyn, Gwennap, Tregave- tion of the said intended railways
    [Show full text]
  • Delegated Report Pdf.Pdf
    Bath & North East Somerset Council MEETING: Development Control Committee AGENDA 29 th July 2015 ITEM MEETING NUMBER DATE: RESPONSIBLE Mark Reynolds, Group Manager Development OFFICER: (Telephone: 01225 477079) TITLE: LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATE AUTHORITY FOR THE PERIOD - 18 th June 2015 – 15 th July 2015 DELEGATED DECISIONS IN RESPECT OF PLANNING ENFORCEMENT CASES ISSUED FOR PERIOD WARD: ALL BACKGROUND PAPERS: None AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM INDEX Applications determined by the Development Manager of P.2 Planning and Transport Development Applications referred to the Chair P.113 Delegated decisions in respect of Planning Enforcement Cases APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT App. Ref . 15/00417/FUL Type: Full Application Location: 20 Brock Street City Centre Bath Bath And North East Somerset BA1 2LW Ward: Abbey Parish: N/A Proposal: Change of use from flat and dwelling to single dwelling, minor alterations and general refurbishment. Applicant: Mr & Mrs Martin And Maggies Higginson Decision Date: 30 June 2015 Expiry Date: 30 June 2015 Decision: PERMIT Details of the decision can be found on the Planning Services pages of the Council’s website by clicking on the link – Public Access App. Ref . 15/00418/LBA Type: Listed Building Consent (Alts/exts) Location: 20 Brock Street City Centre Bath Bath And North East Somerset BA1 2LW Ward: Abbey Parish: N/A Proposal: Internal and external works for the change of use from flat and dwelling to single dwelling, minor alterations and general refurbishment. Applicant: Mr & Mrs Martin and Maggies Higginson Decision Date: 30 June 2015 Expiry Date: 30 June 2015 Decision: CONSENT Details of the decision can be found on the Planning Services pages of the Council’s website by clicking on the link – Public Access App.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 1: Thrubwell Farm Plateau
    Area 1: Thrubwell Farm Plateau Summary of Landscape Character • Clipped hedges which are often ‘gappy’ and supplemented by sheep netting • Late 18th and early 19th century rectilinear field layout at north of area • Occasional groups of trees • Geologically complex • Well drained soils • Flat or very gently undulating plateau • A disused quarry • Parkland at Butcombe Court straddling the western boundary • Minor roads set out on a grid pattern • Settlement within the area consists of isolated farms and houses For detailed Character Area map see Appendix 3 23 Context Bristol airport on the plateau outside the area to the west. Introduction Land-uses 7.1.1 The character area consists of a little over 1sq 7.1.6 The land is mainly under pasture and is also km of high plateau to the far west of the area. The plateau used for silage making. There is some arable land towards extends beyond the Bath and North East Somerset boundary the north of the area. Part of Butcombe Court parkland into North Somerset and includes Felton Hill to the north falls within the area to the west of Thrubwell Lane. and Bristol airport to the west. The southern boundary is marked by the top of the scarp adjoining the undulating Fields, Boundaries and Trees and generally lower lying Chew Valley to the south. 7.1.7 Fields are enclosed by hedges that are generally Geology, Soils and Drainage trimmed and often contain few trees. Tall untrimmed hedges are less common. Hedges are typically ‘gappy’ and of low 7.1.2 Geologically the area is complex though on the species diversity and are often supplemented with sheep- ground this is not immediately apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • Bath & North East Somerset Council
    Bath & North East Somerset Council MEETING: Development Control Committee AGENDA 24 September 2014 ITEM MEETING NUMBER DATE: RESPONSIBLE Lisa Bartlett, Development Manager of Planning and OFFICER: Transport Development (Telephone: 01225 477281) TITLE: LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATE AUTHORITY FOR THE PERIOD - 13 August 2014 – 9th September 2014 DELEGATED DECISIONS IN RESPECT OF PLANNING ENFORCEMENT CASES ISSUED FOR PERIOD WARD: ALL BACKGROUND PAPERS: None AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM INDEX Applications determined by the Development Manager of Planning and Transport Development Applications referred to the Chair Delegated decisions in respect of Planning Enforcement Cases APPLICATIONS DETERMINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT App. Ref . 14/01489/FUL Type: Full Application Location: Public Toilets Henrietta Park Henrietta Road Bathwick Bath Bath And North East Somerset Ward: Abbey Parish: N/A Proposal: External alterations to existing public convenience (Sui Generis) Applicant: Healthmatic Decision Date: 29 August 2014 Expiry Date: 2 September 2014 Decision: PERMIT Details of the decision can be found on the Planning Services pages of the Council’s website by clicking on the link below: http://idox.bathnes.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=14/01489/FUL App. Ref . 14/02284/FUL Type: Full Application Location: The Bertinet Bakery 1 New Bond Street Place City Centre Bath BA1 1BH Ward: Abbey Parish: N/A Proposal: Repainting of shop front and display of new shop signage Applicant: The Bertinet Bakery Ltd Decision Date: 2 September 2014 Expiry Date: 2 September 2014 Decision: Planning permission not required Details of the decision can be found on the Planning Services pages of the Council’s website by clicking on the link below: http://idox.bathnes.gov.uk/WAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=14/02284/FUL App.
    [Show full text]