Alcopops Cheaper Than Energy Drinks: 7-Eleven Gambles with Children’S Lives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alcopops Cheaper Than Energy Drinks: 7-Eleven Gambles with Children’S Lives Alcopops Cheaper than Energy Drinks: 7-Eleven Gambles with Children’s Lives A Report by Alcohol Justice May 2012 Alcopops Cheaper than Energy Drinks: 7-Eleven Gambles with Children’s Lives Executive Summary Alcopops, legally identified as “flavored malt Alcohol Justice is building a community beverages,” are sweet, bubbly high alcohol coalition for an Alcopop-Free ZoneTM (AFZ), a products that are packaged and marketed to campaign asking retailers to voluntarily stop appeal to youth. They are used by the alcohol selling alcopops. We recommend: industry as a transition beverage from soda and non-alcoholic energy drinks to hook youth 1) Community residents, led by youth on alcohol and secure customers for life. and parents, should make their Supersized alcopops, available in single concerns about alcopops known to servings with up to 12% alcohol by volume, the Uppal and Singh families who encourage excessive drinking and are operate 7-Eleven franchises in Marin available at convenience stores frequented by County, and all other storeowners youth throughout the nation. who sell alcopops in the area. In Marin County in Northern California we 2) Counties and cities should put surveyed the prices of supersized alcopops at conditions on land use to protect the popular 7-Eleven stores in Marin and found health and safety of youth. that supersized alcopops were being offered Specifically, officials (police, sheriff, at a promotional price break, priced cheaper land use and planning) should ask for than non-alcoholic energy drinks, and priced restrictions on all single-serving cheaper per standard drink than beer and alcopops and malt liquor sales as even malt liquor. conditions for ABC licenses, and as conditions on use permits. Excessive alcohol consumption is a substantial problem in Marin County, and 3) Retailers should voluntarily cease alcohol is the most widely used drug among purchasing, selling and marketing of the county’s youth. Although alcohol alcopops. We encourage Marin producers should ultimately be held municipalities and policymakers to accountable for the harm their products pass resolutions in support of the cause, alcopop retailers such as 7-Eleven, Alcopop-Free ZoneTM Marin. Inc. and its local franchisees bear responsibility for selling harmful products to 4) Youth and public health groups their communities. throughout the United States should consider forming Alcopop-Free Because numerous attempts by federal and ZoneTM coalitions and demand that state regulators to address the alcopops retailers stop selling the most youth- problem have been thwarted by the alcohol attractive drinks, alcopops. industry, Alcohol Justice has turned to local, direct action as the only way to protect communities from these dangerous products. Along with Marin County community groups, public health advocates, youth and residents, 1 process. These claims benefit the alcohol How Alcopops Appeal to Youth music artist Snoop Dogg is the celebrity healthy lifestyles, quality schools and relative popularity in Marin County, we decided to beverages" that do not look like or the price by the number of standard drinks. Supersized alcopops were priced the same ABV as the domestic beer brands Background Some supersized alcopops were priced industry because alcopop products are taxed Youth are the primary consumers of alcopops, spokesperson for Monster as well as Blast. affluence, and was recently ranked the #1 take a closer look at alcopops pricing at these taste like beer (Mike’s Hard, Mike’s For example, a 6-pack of 12-ounce cans of cheaper per standard drink than beer. (5%), while supersized, single-serving cheaper per standard drink than malt liquor. Alcohol Justice has been involved in several at the lower beer rate, but don't taste like, look with one-third of teenage girls age 12 to 18 Snoop Dogg's promotional videos for both healthiest county in the state. The caveat: it stores. Harder, Smirnoff Ice, Sparks, Blast, Budweiser contains 6 standard drinks. Priced Comparing the average cost per standard alcopops contain 6-12% ABV. The lowest price per standard drink, $0.53, Alcopops, particularly supersized alcopops, o The California State Board of While regulation and taxation of alcopops are 4) Youth and public health groups local and national campaigns to remove like, nor are they called beer. and one-fifth of teenage boys having tried an products are accessible to viewers of all ages lays claim to the second highest excessive Joose, and Jeremiah Weed). Within at $6.99, the cost per standard drink was drink by beverage type, including all products was the promotional price for single quantity, are unquestionably dangerous products that Equalization decision to correct the the purview of the State of California, there is throughout the United States should 4 youth-oriented alcohol products, particularly alcopops product. Alcopops are used by the on social media sites such as YouTube and drinking rate in the state, with 24% having the alcopops category, we $6.99 / 6, or $1.17. A 23.5-ounce can of Four surveyed, alcopops and beer were Looking at the largest available size of 23.5-oz cans of Four Loko, offered at 2 for $5. encourage excessive alcohol consumption tax rate to a distilled spirits level was much that local residents and municipalities consider forming Alcopop-Free alcopops, from the market. In our own In the late 1990s, alcohol producers caught alcohol industry as a Twitter. This heavy-handed marketing and engaged in either binge drinking, defined as differentiated between “supersized” Loko, at 12% ABV, is 4.7 standard drinks, and comparable in price, at $1.03 per standard alcopops, 23.5-oz, compared to 24-oz beer, Even at the regular price of $2.79 each, the among youth. Supersized alcopops are overruled by a California appeals can do. ZoneTM coalitions and demand that backyard, along with Marin County the wave of popular caffeine-laden, non- “transitional packaging obviously targets underage energy consuming more than 4 (women) or 5 (men) alcopops—those available in 16-oz priced at $2.50, was $0.53 per standard drink. drink for beer and $1.01 for alcopops. Malt we saw an even larger price break. At these price per standard drink is $0.58, the same as youth-attractive flavored malt beverages from court, retailers stop selling the most youth- community groups, public health advocates, alcoholic energy drinks such as Red Bull. beverage,” marketed drink consumers. The ads are clear—drinking alcoholic beverages on a single occasion in We conducted a limited pricing survey of servings or larger, with alcohol by liquor was lowest in price per standard drink sizes, alcopops fell to $0.85 per standard the price per standard drink for a 40-oz bottle 16 to 24 fluid ounces, 6% to 12% ABV, and 1) Community residents, led by youth attractive drinks, alcopops. and residents, Alcohol Justice is building a These energy drinks provide a "buzz" with specifically to teens Monster is cool, but drinking Blast elevates the past 30 days, or heavy drinking, defined alcopops and other beverages available at volume higher than 5%, and regular across all comparisons, at $0.58 (malt liquor drink, while the price of beer is the same as its of cheap malt liquor, and 23% less per contain between 2.5 to 5 standard drinks in a o Legislation to limit supersizing was and parents, need to make their community coalition to get these insidious high caffeine and stimulating additives such and youth to get them the drinker to pimp status. as drinking more than 1 (women) or 2 (men) Marin 7-Eleven stores in March 2012 to better serving sizes (approximately 12-oz) was only available in single-serving quantities average, at $1.03. standard drink than the cheapest beer product single serving, enough to cause serious introduced in other states but never in concerns about alcopops known to as L-carnitine, taurine, and ginseng, and are hooked on alcohol drinks per day on average in the past 30 understand the special pricing appeal of that contain about 5% ABV (Mike’s of 24-oz or larger). ($0.75). Blast 23.5-oz cans were priced physical and mental harm to youth. The high- California, 7-Eleven, the Uppal/Singh families products off Marin’s store shelves by asking 8 retailers to agree not to sell alcopops, and available to consumers of any age. Brands and secure days, compared to 17% statewide. alcopops relative to other beverage choices Hard products, Smirnoff Ice). All 11 of the Marin County 7-Eleven stores similarly to 40-oz bottles of malt liquor, at $0.59 alcohol content in the products being offered and all other storeowners who sell passing local government resolutions to such as Sparks (MillerCoors), Tilt (Anheuser- customers for life. According to Larry Meredith, Marin County's available. We wanted to find out for ourselves sell alcopops. Of all products surveyed, beer When single-serving quantities were per standard drink. encourages excessive drinking, already a o The California Department of alcopops. support an Alcopop-Free ZoneTM Marin (AFZ). Busch InBev), and Four Loko (Phusion Department of Health and Human Services what price breaks on alcopops a Marin We then compared alcopops to other drink was available in the largest variety of sizes compared, alcopops were priced less per substantial problem in Marin County. Alcoholic Beverage Control has Projects) combined caffeine and alcohol into Alcopop producers have been wildly Director, excessive drinking is problematic teenager would find when he or she walks types at two levels: and quantities. Malt liquor was available for standard drink than beer. Beer actually refused to take action on alcopops, 2) While only the state can ban premixed alcoholic energy drinks (AEDs). successful in marketing alcopops to youth, among all age groups, including Marin's into a 7-Eleven store looking for a buzz (or purchase only in single-serving quantities.
Recommended publications
  • High Quality Development Path of Chinese Sauce-Flavor Baijiu Industry—Analysis Based on Consumption Data
    E3S Web of Conferences 251, 01099 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101099 TEES 2021 High quality development path of Chinese sauce-flavor Baijiu industry—Analysis based on consumption data Cong Peng1,*, and Xu Guo1 1 School of Economics and Finance, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, Guizhou, China, 550014 Abstract:As an important part of Baijiu industry in China, Chinese sauce-flavor Baijiu is sought after by the consumer market for its unique taste. However, in recent years, there are still many challenges in the process of industrial development. Based on the analysis of three characteristics of Chinese sauce- flavor Baijiu market and the internal and external environments of industrial development, the internal and external factors of high quality and sustainable development of Chinese sauce-flavor Baijiu industry were discussed from three aspects - concentrated development, green development and diversified development. profits and taxes, the sauce-flavor Baijiu industry has made steady development[1]. In 2019, with the 1 Introduction production of 400,000 kilo-litre (about 5.1% of total Baijiu brewing in China has a long time history dated China’s production), the such type of enterprises back to ancient times. In the course of evolution, kinds accomplished the production value of 134.1 billion yuan, of brewing technology have been created and a unique 2% of the total China’s Baijiu industry value, among liquor culture was formed. The custom of raising a cup which the sauce-flavor Baijiu enterprises of Guizhou of liquor has rooted in Chinese culture for hundreds of province produced 80% of the total China’s amount, years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Wine Nutrition and Ingredient Labeling on Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 4-23-2021 The Impact of Wine Nutrition and Ingredient Labeling on Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions Kara Tate Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, and the Food and Drug Law Commons Recommended Citation Tate, Kara, "The Impact of Wine Nutrition and Ingredient Labeling on Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions" (2021). Honors Theses. 1854. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1854 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Impact of Wine Nutrition and Ingredient Labeling on Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions by Kara Ashley Tate A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College Oxford April 2021 Approved by ___________________________________ Advisor: Professor Laurie Babin ___________________________________ Reader: Professor Conor Dowling ___________________________________ Reader: Professor Sam Cousely 1 © 2021 Kara Ashley Tate ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 ABSTRACT KARA ASHLEY TATE: The Impact of Wine Nutrition and Ingredient Labeling on Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions (Under the direction of Dr. Laurie Babin) Current TTB regulations do not require that US wine producers display nutrition and ingredient labeling on their wine labels. However, recent attempts at passing legislation to mandate that such information be provided on labels in the EU suggests that US policy makers will soon follow suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Marks Inter Partes Decision O/327/19
    O-327-19 TRADE MARKS ACT 1994 IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION NO. 3281046 BY EVANS GROUP HOLDING COMPANY LIMITED TO REGISTER THE TRADE MARK: Lord Nelson FOR GOODS AND SERVICES IN CLASSES 32 and 33 AND IN THE MATTER OF OPPOSITION TO ITS REGISTRATION UNDER NO. 412571 BY HEAVEN HILL DISTILLERIES, INC. Background and pleadings 1) On 8 January 2018 Clare Joanne Evans applied to register the following trade mark for goods and services in Classes 32 and 33: Lord Nelson The application was published for opposition purposes on 2 February 2018. During the course of these proceedings an amendment to the specification in Class 32 was accepted, so that the specification of the opposed mark in Classes 32 and 33 now stands as shown in the Annex to this decision. 2) The application is opposed by Heaven Hill Distilleries, Inc. (“the Opponent”). The opposition, which is directed against all the goods applied for, is based upon section 5(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (“the Act”), for the purposes of which the Opponent relies upon the following EU trade mark registrations for the following respective marks and goods: EU 16756652 ADMIRAL NELSON’S Class 33: Spirits; rum. EU 14329254 2 Class 33: Spirits; rum. 3) EU 16756652 was filed on 22 May 2017 and registered on 5 September 2017. EU 14329254 was filed on 02 July 2015 and registered on 15 October 2015. The significance of these respective dates is that (1) both the Opponent’s marks constitute earlier marks in accordance with section 6 of the Act, and (2) they are not subject to the proof of use conditions contained in section 6A of the Act, their respective registration procedures having been completed less than five years before the publication of the Applicant’s mark.
    [Show full text]
  • National Diet and Nutrition Survey
    NDNS National Diet and Nutrition Survey Booklet for 8-12 year olds In Confidence Point Address CKL Person no First 1001- 1006 - 1008 1011 name: 1012 - 1026 1005 1007 Card Type Batch Spare 0 1 1 Interviewer 1009 - 1038 1027 - 1031 no. 1032 - 1037 1039 - 1010 1050 • Here are some questions for you to answer on your own. • We are interested in your honest answers. • We will not tell anyone what your answers are. • Look at the instructions on the next page and read what to do. • Ask the interviewer for help if you do not understand a question or are not sure what to do. Thank you for taking part in this survey GREEN NDNS(I) Self-completion_8-12 v1 Aug 07, REC Ref. 07/H0604/113 For use from 01/04/09 How to answer these questions • Please read each question carefully • Most of the questions can be answered by putting a tick in the box next to the answer that applies to you, like this Yes 91 No 2 • Sometimes you have to write a number in the box, for example I was 8 years old write in • Next to some of the boxes are arrows and instructions They show or tell you which question to answer next. If there are no special instructions, just answer the next question. No 2 Go to question 4 Yes 91 I was 10 years old write in 1 Cigarette Smoking Q1 Have you ever tried smoking a cigarette, even if it was only a puff or two? Tick one box 1051 No Î Go to question 2 2 Yes 1 How old were you when you tried smoking a cigarette, even if it was only a puff or two? 1052 - 1053 I was years old Write in Q2 Now read all the following sentences very carefully and tick the box next to the one which best describes you.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Advertising Visile from the Street in Retail-Dense Areas of New
    Epi Data Brief New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene July 2011, No. 6 Alcohol advertising visible from the Methodology Overview street in retail-dense areas of The objective of this alcohol ad count study was to assess above- New York City ground, stationary alcohol advertisements in retail-dense areas Most ads are in store windows and promote beer of 30 randomly selected NYC zip codes. Data were collected during a • There are an estimated 10,500 above-ground, stationary alcohol single ad cycle (one month) in fall advertisements in areas with many stores and other retail outlets 2010. Data were weighted to create (retail-dense areas) of New York City. citywide estimates for retail-dense areas, which are presented here. • Beer is the most common alcohol type in advertisements visible at the street level in retail-dense areas of the city, with an estimated 8,240 Definitions beer advertisements, compared with 1,827 liquor, 383 wine, 49 Alcohol types include beer, wine, alcopop, and 16 malt liquor advertisements. liquor/spirits, malt liquor, wine cooler, and “alcopops”, which are • Approximately two thirds (64%) of alcohol advertising visible from the flavored malt beverages. street in retail-dense areas of NYC is placed inside store windows The five advertisement types are: (indoors: 6,727), compared with 2,374 outdoor, 1,287 ambient (non- 1) indoor ads placed on the inside of traditional ads, such as beverage coasters or flags), 111 bus shelter, retail windows and visible on the and 16 billboard advertisements. street, such as posters and neon signage; 2) outdoor ads on phone Alcohol advertisements in retail-dense areas booths, subway entrances, sides of buildings, storefront outdoors, or Alcohol Type Advertisement Type café umbrellas; 3) billboards; 4) bus shelters; and 5) ambient ads, which Alcopop Ambient Billboard <1% Malt Liquor are non-traditional ads, such as 1% Liquor <1% 12% Bus shelter 1% beverage coasters or flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Consumers Want More Nutritional and Health Information on Wine Labels? Insights from the EU and USA
    nutrients Article Do Consumers Want More Nutritional and Health Information on Wine Labels? Insights from the EU and USA Azzurra Annunziata 1,*, Eugenio Pomarici 2, Riccardo Vecchio 3 and Angela Mariani 1 1 Department of Economic and Legal Studies, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples 80133, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, Legnaro 35020, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici 80055, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+39-081-547-4336 Received: 22 April 2016; Accepted: 24 June 2016; Published: 7 July 2016 Abstract: The global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol launched in 2010 by the World Health Organization includes, amongst several areas of recommended actions, providing consumer information about, and labelling, alcoholic beverages to indicate alcohol-related harm. Labelling requirements worldwide for alcoholic drinks are currently quite diverse and somewhat limited compared to labelling on food products and on tobacco. In this context, the current paper contributes to the academic and political debate on the inclusion of nutritional and health information on wine labelling, providing some insights into consumer interest in, and preferences for, such information in four core wine-producing and -consuming countries: Italy, France, Spain, and the United States of America. A rating-based conjoint analysis was performed in order to ascertain consumer preferences for different formats of additional information on wine labels, and a segmentation of the sample was performed to determine the existence of homogeneous groups of consumers in relation to the degrees of usefulness attached to the nutritional and health information on wine labels.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol on the Web
    LESSON PLAN Level: Grades 9 to 10 About the Author: MediaSmarts Production of this lesson has been made possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada. Alcohol on the Web This lesson is part of USE, UNDERSTAND & CREATE: A Digital Literacy Framework for Canadian Schools: http://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/digital-literacy-framework. Overview In this lesson, students explore issues surrounding the marketing of alcoholic beverages on the Internet. The lesson begins with a class discussion about personal experiences on alcohol industry websites, followed by a summary of the research findings of the U.S. Center for Media Education (CME) and Center on Alcohol Advertising to Youth on alcohol advertising on the Web. In addition, students become familiar with existing Canadian guidelines on the broadcasting of advertisements for alcoholic beverages and discuss the challenges of applying these guidelines to Web content. In groups, students deconstruct and evaluate current beer, liquor and wine websites using a checklist of youth-friendly marketing techniques. Group findings are presented to the class. Note to Teacher: In this lesson students will be visiting alcohol websites which, in theory, are not intended for minors. Because of this, you may wish to have parental permission before sending the kids into sites that are nominally age- restricted. Learning Outcomes Students will demonstrate an awareness of: the Internet as a sophisticated marketing tool the techniques used by online marketers to attract kids and teens the
    [Show full text]
  • Alcopops 2020 Time to End Big Alcohol’S Predation on Youth
    Time to End Big Alcohol’s Predation on Youth ALCOPOPS 2020 TIME TO END BIG ALCOHOL’S PREDATION ON YOUTH A report from Alcohol Justice and San Rafael Alcohol & Drug Coalition February 2019 1 Alcopops 2020 ALCOPOPS 2020 TIME TO END BIG ALCOHOL’S PREDATION ON YOUTH Carson Benowitz-Fredericks, MSPH Research Manager, Alcohol Justice Bruce Lee Livingston, MPP Executive Director/CEO, Alcohol Justice EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alcopops comprise a wide array of low-price, sugary, carbonated, heavily flavored alcoholic beverages. They can be very strong and very large, going as high as 14% alcohol by volume (ABV) and coming in sin- gle-serving cans as large as 25 oz. Their strength, combined with their resemblance in both packaging and flavor to sodas and energy drinks, makes them extraordinarily attractive—and dangerous—for youth. Findings • Nearly two-thirds of underage drinkers drank alcopops in the past month. This number has risen despite government efforts to curb the products. • Underage drinkers who drink alcopops are more likely to have episodes of heavy drinking, suffer alcohol-related injuries, and engage in physical fights. • Early exposure to alcoholic beverages may create permanent changes in the brain. Overexpo- sure to sugars may also permanently change brain function. • A single alcopop can deliver up to 5.5 standard servings of alcohol. This makes one can the equivalent of a binge drinking session, and could send a young drinker to the emergency room. • Alcopop drinkers underestimate their own blood-alcohol content (BAC) by up to 0.04 percent. • Big Alcohol persistently markets alcopops in youth-friendly ways, including low price points, flashy packaging, social media campaigns, and ubiquitous presence in convenience stores.
    [Show full text]
  • Beer Bingo Call Sheet
    Beer Bingo Call Sheet This is a randomized list of all 35 bingo events in square format that you can mark off in order, choose from randomly, or cut up to pull from a hat: Brown White Wheat Baileys IPA Ale Wine Beer Ruby Fruit Gin Alcopop Schnapps Ale Beer Absinthe Tequila Sourz Red Wine Port Blonde Honey Stout Lager Sherry Beer Beer After Brandy Cider Vodka Sambuca Shock Bitter Jagermeister Drambuie Amaretto Whiskey BuzzBuzzBingo.com · Create, Download, Print, Play, BINGO! · Copyright © 2003-2021 · All rights reserved Beer Bingo Call Sheet This continues the randomized list of all 35 bingo events. The bingo squares are aligned on each page to allow for easier cutting. Chocolate Prosecco Rum Mild Tia Maria Beer BuzzBuzzBingo.com · Create, Download, Print, Play, BINGO! · Copyright © 2003-2021 · All rights reserved Booze Bingo Ruby Alcopop Drambuie Port Cider Ale Bitter Absinthe Stout Prosecco Baileys After Vodka FREE Tequila Red Wine Shock Chocolate Honey Sambuca Whiskey Sourz Beer Beer Fruit IPA Mild Amaretto Sherry Beer This bingo card was created randomly from a total of 35 events. BuzzBuzzBingo.com · Create, Download, Print, Play, BINGO! · Copyright © 2003-2021 · All rights reserved Booze Bingo Absinthe Tia Maria Bitter Jagermeister Mild Blonde Wheat Red Wine Baileys Sambuca Beer Beer Whiskey Stout FREE Port Amaretto Honey After Alcopop Gin Vodka Beer Shock White Fruit Schnapps IPA Sherry Wine Beer This bingo card was created randomly from a total of 35 events. BuzzBuzzBingo.com · Create, Download, Print, Play, BINGO! · Copyright © 2003-2021 · All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine V5.Indd
    Q3 2017 | Issue 5 The Sparkling Edition How sparkling wine is taking over the global market As the sparkling wine category continues to dominate the headlines and outperform still light wines, Wine Intelligence gets to grips with why consumers can’t resist the draw of the bubble 12 key trends in the evolving - and Flavour descriptors for wine: what really diversifying - Chinese wine market tickles consumers’ tastebuds WINE INTELLIGENCE VINITRAC® OCTOBER 2017 This October, Wine Intelligence is launching the next wave of the world’s largest ongoing survey of wine drinkers. Use the opportunity to talk directly to your consumers and find the answers to your business questions. Contact [email protected] for more information, or to submit your questions. BRAND LABEL BESPOKE HEALTH TESTING QUESTIONS AVAILABLE MARKETS Argentina - Australia - Belgium - Brazil - Canada - Chile - China - Colombia - Denmark - Finland - France - Germany - Hong Kong - Ireland - Italy - Japan - Mexico - Netherlands - New Zealand - Norway - Portugal - Russia - Singapore - South Africa - South Korea - Spain - Sweden - Switzerland - UK - US 2 | wineiQ | Q3 2017 Contents Comment News and events Fashions come and go in the drinks industry; a bit like seasons, only Our quarterly round up of the with less certainty on the timing. For our forebears of the 1960s, workshops, presentations and events dark, interesting cocktails like the Old Fashioned and the Sidecar were 4 all the rage. In the 1970s and 80s, it was Liebfraumilch, Chianti, and we have delivered. if you were an American college student at the time (as I was), it was Stats of the quarter the sweet proto-alcopop known as a Wine Cooler.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Liquor Control Act of 1934
    Liquor Control Act of 1934 Note: This document has been prepared for the use of licensees in 5/1-3.14 Rectifier the operation of their business; it is not the official version of 5/1-3.15 Distributor the document. The official version is to be found in the Illinois Revised Statutes. Any inconsistencies should be resolved by 5/1-3.16 Importing Distributor reference to the Statutes. 5/1-3.17 Retailer 5/1-3.17.1 Special Event Retailer Title: An Act relating to alcoholic liquors. 5/1-3.18 Sell at retail Cite: 235 ILCS 5/1-1 et seq. 5/1-3.19 State Commission From: Chapter 43, paragraph 93.9 et seq. 5/1-3.20 Department Source: L. 1933-34, 2nd S.S., page 57. 5/1-3.21 Sale Date: Approved January 31, 1934 5/1-3.22 To sell Short title: Liquor Control Act of 1934. 5/1-3.23 Restaurant ACT 5 — Liquor Control Act of 1934 5/1-3.24 Club Article 5/1-3.25 Hotel I Construction 5/1-3.26 Bowling alley (Repealed eff. 1-1-96) II Scope of Act 5/1-3.27 Foreign Importer III State Control Commission 5/1-3.28 Broker IV Local Control 5/1-3.29 Non-resident dealer V Licenses 5/1-3.30 Special Event VI General Provisions 5/1-3.31 Limited Wine Manufacturer VII Licenses 5/1-3.32 Auction liquor license VIIA Warehouses 5/1-3.33 Brew Pub VIII Taxation of Liquor 5/1-3.34 Caterer Retailer IX Local Referendum 5/1-3.35 Special Use permit license X Violations, Penalties, Searches and Seizures 5/1-3.36 Private Function XI Partial Invalidity and Repeal 5/1-3.37 Council XII Grape and Wine Resources Council 5/1-3.38 Craft brewer 5/1-3.39 Homemade brewed beverage Article I — Construction Section 5/1-1 Short Title 5/1-1 Short Title This Act may be cited as the Liquor Control Act of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS7 Appendix A9 Alcohol Ed
    APPENDIX A9 ALCOHOL, ESS7-2014 ed. 3.0 General information on the ESS alcohol measure .................................. 2 Country specific information for: Austria ........................................................................................... 3 Belgium .......................................................................................... 7 Czech Republic .............................................................................. 14 Denmark ....................................................................................... 18 Estonia ......................................................................................... 22 Finland ......................................................................................... 29 France .......................................................................................... 36 Germany ....................................................................................... 40 Hungary ....................................................................................... 44 Ireland ......................................................................................... 48 Israel ........................................................................................... 52 Lithuania ....................................................................................... 62 Netherlands ................................................................................... 69 Norway ......................................................................................... 73
    [Show full text]