<<

sa conservation success stories SA Conservation success stories

BONTEBOK: Back from the brink

Image by Sashkin by Joseph Mulders

THE xtinction is a scary con- (over-hunting), mismanagement and ( PYGARGUS cept. The fact that a group a disregard for the value of a spe- PYGARUS). , SOUTH of organisms can be pres- cies. Whether it is economic, envi- AFRICA. sured to such an extent ronmental or social value, the loss Ethat they get wiped out is a sobering will influence the way in which the thought. Yet even in today’s climate species is perceived and treated. of heightened environmental aware- The bontebok (Damaliscus py- ness, extinctions do still occur; in gargus pygargus) is a subspecies fact, rates of extinctions have in- that was almost lost in this way. creased drastically over the past Fortunately, -breeding efforts 100 years, thanks to -in- by the private sector, combined duced pressures (Ceballos et al. with conservation efforts by state 2015; Dirzo et al. 2014; Leakey and agencies, have pulled bontebok Lewis 1995). This happens through back from the brink. urban sprawl, spreading agricultural Hunting and agricultural pres- practices, pollution, exploitation sures had diminished total bontebok

Photo by Mogens Trolle.

Photo by Four Oaks. ʽBONTEBOKʼ BY ROWLAND WARD (1848-1912). sa conservation success stories sa conservation success stories

BONTEBOK NATIONAL PARK IS A SPECIES- SPECIFIC NATIONAL PARK IN SOUTH Image supplied by Dr Johan Strydom. AFRICA. IT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1931 TO ENSURE THE PRESERVATION OF THE BONTEBOK. IT IS THE SMALLEST OF 'S 20 NATIONAL PARKS, COVERING AN AREA OF 27.86 KM2. THE PARK IS PART OF THE , WHICH IS A WORLD HERITAGE SITE. THE PARK IS LOCATED 6KM SOUTH OF , SA Conservation success stories IN THE FOOTHILLS OF THE LANGEBERG MOUNTAINS.IT IS BORDERED TO THE SOUTH BY THE BREEDE RIVER. SOURCE: http://www.sanparks.org

SA Conservation success stories SA THE OR BLESBUCK Photo by (DAMALISCUS Vaclav PYGARGUS Volrab. PHILLIPSI).

populations to a mere 121 individ- The species had subsequently collaboration with the National uals by 1921 (East 1999, Le Roux begun to spread throughout South Bontebok Breeding Association Image supplied by Jenny Currie. 2010). Various concerned Cape Africa. This ultimately enabled (NBBA), Cape Nature and var- farmers and government officials game breeders to get involved ious other conservation agencies, Bontebok’s rarity has created Bontebok Breeders Association (a the Overberg in the . subsequently got involved in an and, through collaboration with the process was streamlined with a significant economic value in WRSA advice committee). This makes natural rangeland early conservation effort, resulting the government, play a key the development of a DNA method the game-breeding industry and “I am proud of the working relation- conservation challenging. Much in the declaration of the spe- role in preserving the bontebok that allows for accurate detection of this has created an incentive for ship we have with government author- of the indigenous rangeland/natural cies-specific Bontebok National subspecies. mixed-gene individuals (Van Wyk the private sector to invest in ities and the way we work together already falls within protected Park in 1931. A key consideration in bontebok et al. 2013). this national biodiversity asset. to solve issues between sustain- areas such as the Bontebok National Only 22 bontebok were intro- genetic conservation is its ability to Currently, the national bontebok Today, a bontebok can be sold for able utilisation and conservation of Park and De Hoop Nature Reserve. duced to this park and by 1939 breed with the blesbok (Damaliscus population is estimated at 8 000 anything between R130 000 and the bontebok,” says Johan. Due to growing populations and the population had grown to 123 pygargus phillipsi). individuals, of which an estimated R150 000. Now that species numbers have the already fragmented and threat- individuals. However, by 1956, due The resulting offspring is a 1 100 individuals occur within This is a significant success story been replenished, what is the next ened vegetation in this area, how- to habitat constraints, the num- mixture of the two subspecies (a protected areas and the rest (seven made possible through the joint step in terms of conservation? ever, conservation efforts have bers had dropped to a few dozen man-made classification and not times more than in State parks) initiatives of government and the According to the scientific manager: been directed at protecting regions countrywide (there is uncertainty a natural classification) that, apart on private land. In South Africa, private game-breeding sector. The biodiversity, at CapeNature, Guy in the adjacent extended range- surrounding this number as the from threatening genetic integrity, government funding and available co-operation between government Palmer, “To conserve the bontebok land. This is not possible without remaining bontebok were segre- may negatively influence the value land for conservation is limited. The and the ranching sector in the as a species, it is crucial to safeguard involving neighbouring private land gated). Once again, this crisis of the species in the wildlife industry. importance of the private sector is case of bontebok preservation has its genetic integrity. This does owners into bontebok conserva- spurred a conservation initiative so To reduce the occurrences of thus illustrated by the fact that more been highly effective. not only refer to correct breeding tion initiatives, demonstrating fur- that, in 1960, the park was moved mixed individuals, a regulation than 85% of bontebok reside on “Authorities from the ranching management but also refers to ther their crucial role and creating to a new location at Swellendam. strategy was established to mod- privately owned land. Furthermore, industry are working closely with ensuring that the species is yet another platform for cohesion At this stage, approximately 200 erate population management the ranching industry holds three government departments, creating exposed to similar environmental between the sectors. Already, ap- bontebok remained and were dis- throughout the country. Part of this times more land than national and regulations for efficient management conditions and evolutionary selective proximately 2 600 individuals re- tributed to the park and to various regulation involved providing ev- provincial parks, making the sector and control to ensure that conservation pressures to which the bontebok side in their natural and extended interested private Eastern Cape idence of cross-breeding prior to crucial for bontebok conservation needs for the bontebok are met, but is adapted, thus guaranteeing the rangelands, elevating the species farmers. The new park presented any sales or movement of indi- when parks reach capacity. The at the same time balancing practical most natural possible maintenance to a near-threatened (NT) status a better habitat and the numbers vidual bontebok. Since 1989, pro- NBBA and the associated provincial needs for use of the species of the species.” on the IUCN Red Data list (Lloyd gradually increased to approximately viding proof of a pure breed was conservation authorities are busy in the industry,” says Dr Johan Being highly characteristic of and David 2008). It is through this 700 by 1978. The park also became done using a phenotypically based with a process of verifying which of Strydom, chairman of the Bontebok coastal Cape (East 1999), the successful co-operation between a source for the distribution of spe- photographic method (Fabricius et the 8 000 are mixed-gene Advisory Committee and a provincial bontebok is historically endemic to conservation authorities and the cies to satellite areas and farms. al. 1989). In 2010, through close individuals and which are pure. representative of the National an already restricted rangeland of wildlife ranching industry that this SA Conservation success stories sa conservation success stories more important than ever that both more important than ever that both is it Now this. in instrumental been and have initiatives game-breeding conservation through applied mand de- economic and science lations, brink. The combinationoftheregu- the from back pulled been has cies nomic demand, the bontebok spe- of conservationconcernandeco- cies andconservationcanberealised. spe- the of utilisation between balance Thus, driven by a combination Thus, drivenbyacombination CAN BEREVERSEDTO STEADY GROWTH. LIVING PROOF THAT, WITH THE RIGHTATTITUDE, THREATENED EXTINCTION MARVEL ATNOTBONTEBOK —THEY’RE THE ONLY EXQUISITE,BUT ALSO BONTEBOK ATWESTERN CAPE. THERE’S EVERY VERGELEGEN, REASON TO Photo byMeldtvanderSpuy. • • • REFERENCES: • • • • • • • Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galletti, M., Ceballos, G., Nick, J. B., Collen, B. 2014. Defaunation in theAnthropocene. South Africa: StakeholderPerspectives. ToolConservation in a as Ranching Wildlife Private of Role the Exploring 2008. P.,J. Sadler,J. Evans, J. A., Cousins, Induced SpeciesLosses:EnteringtheSixthMassExtinction. American Association forthe Advancement ofScience. P.G., Ehrlich, Ceballos, R.,Barnosky, A. D.,Garcia, M., Palmer,R. A., Pringle, T. M.2015. Human- Modern Accelerated Bontebok (Damaliscuspygargus pygargus South African of Investigation Dilemma: A2013. AMolecular L. D. Dalton, E., Randi, Kotze, A., VanM., Wyk, A. 2015.1. . Downloadedon19June 2015. 2008. J. David, P., Lloyd, Leakey, R.,Lewis,R.1995.TheSixthExtinction:Patternsof Life andtheFutureofHumankind. Le Roux Breeding SpecialistGroup(SSC/IUCN)andEndangeredWildlife Trust, Parkview, South Africa Friedmann, Y., Daly, B. 2004. Red Data Book of the of South Africa: A Conservation Assessment. Conservation Blesbok Populations. and Bontebok Hybrid Identifying for Function Discriminant A1989. W. Zucchini, J., H. Hensbergen, Van C., Fabricius, East, R.1999. African Database1999.IUCN,Gland,SwitzerlandandCambridge, UK 345: 401-406 , J.2010.Bontebok.WildenJag, June,pp.14-18 South African JournalofWildlifeResearch Te UN e Ls o Traee Seis Version Species. Threatened of List Red IUCN The . ssp. pygargus pygargus Damaliscus D’Alton (privategamefarmer, Mick Western acknowledges author The ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: to beabrightone. looks bontebok the of future the that sectorsprivate and public between cohesion and conservation mental tween economicgrowth,environ be- balance the to thanks is It tained. main- be balance and momentum Ecology andSociety ) andBlesbok( Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi . 13:43 . 19:61-66. Photos courtesyMeyrickBowker. - tance andinsightsonthesubject. assis- and unwavering their for Parks Tourism) Cape Eastern at gist ecolo ( Peinke Dean Dr diversitylegislation,CapeNature)and bio- manager: (senior Hignett Deon CapeNature), biodiversity, manager: Association; WRSA member), Guy Palmer Breeders (scientific Bontebok National the of representative vincial pro- Committee; Advisory Bontebok Dr Johan Strydom (chairman: Cape), ). ConservationGenetics. 13 Doubleday, New York Science . -