DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement Signatories 121418

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement Signatories 121418 November 11, 2018 Transatlantic Democracy Working Group Statement on Central European University As members and supporters of the bipartisan Transatlantic Democracy Working Group, we see the refusal of the Hungarian government to enable the prestigious Central European University (CEU) to continue operating its campus in Budapest as a serious blow to academic freedom in Hungary. Protecting institutions of higher education is an essential part of democracy. A crackdown on academic freedom is one of a series of dangerous developments in Hungary under the leadership of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. The campaign against the CEU is a highly symbolic move against a vital institution founded to promote the transatlantic values of democracy, openness, and equality of opportunity. Founded in 1991, CEU is a graduate-level university based in Budapest, in partnership with Bard College, and with academic accreditation in Hungary and the State of New York. Because it is a joint American-Hungarian institution, it has support across the political spectrum in the United States and at all levels of our government. Michael Ignatieff, President and Rector of the CEU, thanked the U.S. Ambassador to Hungary David Cornstein as well as the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Congress, the Office of the Governor of New York, and the New York State Education Department for their efforts to secure an agreement certifying CEU for continued operation in Hungary. Ambassador Cornstein took a principled stand in using the #IStandWithCEU hashtag on the embassy website. The Hungarian government, however, has refused to sign this agreement for almost one full year. As the Trump administration has sought “principled engagement” with Hungary, we see the unwillingness of the Hungarian government to reciprocate in a principled manner to a priority request from the U.S. government as an insult that damages the future of U.S.-Hungarian relations. When an illiberal leader takes adversarial action against an institution with U.S. roots, the U.S. must acknowledge this as a breach, say so publicly, and hold the government to account through clear, responsive action. As a member of NATO, we must also ensure that Hungary is accountable in upholding democratic freedoms; NATO’s strength depends on it. CEU must receive full recertification by December 1, 2018 or it will be forced to relocate to Austria. But, the Hungarian government’s brazen procrastination has already done irreparable damage to this prestigious university in Hungary and may have delayed matters until it is too late for a solution. There should be consequences for the bilateral relationship because of the failure to act in good faith with the United States to protect our joint interest in the CEU, including by downgrading the level of meetings with Hungarian officials. Ambassador Cornstein and his U.S. government colleagues have stood up for a principled relationship with Hungary in standing with CEU. We believe that it is necessary for the American interest to stand tough against Hungary’s illiberal challenge and continue to publicly hold the government of Hungary accountable, including from high levels in DC, for its attack on academic freedom, democratic institutions, and principles. Signatories: TDWG Members and Supporters Signatories have joined in their individual capacities. Institutional affiliation is listed for identification purposes only. Ambassador Norm Eisen, Steering Security and Cooperation in Europe; Committee Co-Chair, Transatlantic Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy Working Group; Senior Fellow, Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Brookings Institution; former U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic Marc Behrendt, Director of Europe and Eurasia Programs, Freedom House Jeff Gedmin, Steering Committee Co- Chair, Transatlantic Democracy Working Rob Berschinski, Senior Vice President for Group; Editor-in-Chief, The American Policy, Human Rights First; former Deputy Interest; former President and CEO, Radio Assistant Secretary of State for Free Europe / Radio Liberty Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Susan Corke, Director of Secretariat, Nicole Bibbins Sedaca, Professor and Transatlantic Democracy Working Group; Chair, Georgetown University School of Senior Resident Fellow, The German Foreign Service Marshall Fund of the United States Thomas Carothers, Senior Vice President Mike Abramowitz, President, Freedom for Studies, Carnegie Endowment for House; former director of the U.S. International Peace Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Levine Institute for Holocaust Education. Mike Carpenter, Senior Director, Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Paige Alexander, Executive Director, Engagement; former Deputy Assistant European Cooperative for Rural Secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, Development; former Assistant Eurasia, and the Balkans Administrator for Europe and Eurasia, U.S. Agency for International Development Sarah Cleveland, Professor of Human and Constitutional Rights and Faculty, Anders Åslund, Senior Fellow, Atlantic Columbia University Law School; Member Council of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Ambassador Adrian A. Basora , Co-Chair, Commission) Eurasia Program and Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute; former Nicholas Danforth, Senior Policy Analyst, U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic Bipartisan Policy Center Ambassador Dan Baer, former U.S. Ambassador to the Organization for Larry Diamond, Senior Fellow, Stanford Carl Gershman, President of the National Freeman Spogli Institute for International Endowment for Democracy Studies; Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution (signed 11/13/2018) Maxim Eristavi, Nonresident Research James Goldgeier, Visiting Senior Fellow, Fellow in the Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council on Foreign Relations; Professor, Council School of International Service, American University Gregory Feifer, Executive Director, Institute of Current World Affairs Stephen Grand, Visiting Professor at the Free University in Amsterdam Ambassador Lee Feinstein, former U.S. Ambassador to Poland (signed 12/12/ Daniel S. Hamilton, Professor and 2018) Executive Director, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins Jamie Fly, Senior Fellow and Director of SAIS; President, Transatlantic Leadership the Future of Geopolitics and Asia Network; former Deputy Assistant programs, The German Marshall Fund Secretary of State for European Affairs Ira Forman, Senior Advisor for Combatting Melinda Haring, Editor, Atlantic Council; Antisemitism, Human Rights First; Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute Fellow, Center for Jewish Civilization, Georgetown University School of Foreign Melissa Hooper, Director for Human Service; former U.S. State Department Rights and Civil Society, Human Rights Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat First Anti-Semitism Alex T. Johnson, Senior Policy Advisor for Jacob Freedman, Senior Director, Albright Europe and Eurasia, Open Society Stonebridge Group; former Chief Foundations Speechwriter, Secretaries of Defense Chuck Hagel and Leon Panetta; M.A. Robert Kagan, Stephen & Barbara Central European University Friedman Senior Fellow, Project on International Order and Strategy, Foreign Dr. Francis Fukuyama, Director for Center Policy, The Brookings Institution on Democracy, Development, and Rule of Law; Senior Fellow, Stanford Freeman Jonathan Katz, Senior Fellow, German Spogli Institute for International Studies Marshall Fund of the United States; former Deputy Assistant Administrator Charles Gati, Research Professor of Europe and Eurasia, U.S. Agency for European and Eurasian Studies, Johns International Development Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies; former Senior Advisor with the Ambassador Ian Kelly, former U.S. Policy Planning Staff, U.S. Department of Ambassador to the Organization for State Security and Cooperation in Europe; Damir Marusic, Executive Editor, The former U.S. Ambassador to Georgia American Interest Andrew Kenealy, Research Analyst, Elisa Massimino, Senior Fellow, Carr Governance Studies, The Brookings Center for Human Rights Policy, Kennedy Institution School of Government, Harvard University Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Senior Fellow and Thomas O. Melia, Washington Director, Director of the Transatlantic Security PEN America; former Assistant Program, Center for a New American Administrator for Europe and Eurasia, U.S. Security Agency for International Development; former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State James Kirchick, Visiting Fellow, Center on for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor the United States and Europe, Project on International Order and Strategy, The Blaise Misztal, Director of National Brookings Institution Security, Bipartisan Policy Center Harold Koh, Sterling Professor of Ambassador Derek Mitchell, President, International Law, Yale Law School; former National Democratic Institute; former U.S. Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State; Ambassador to Myanmar former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Yascha Mounk, Lecturer, Harvard University Richard Kraemer, Fellow, Eurasia Program, Foreign Policy Research Institute Joshua Muravchik, Distinguished Fellow, World Affairs Institute David J. Kramer, former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Fron Nahzi, Senior Director of Global Rights, and Labor Development, McCain Institute for International Leadership at Arizona State Bernard-Henri Levy, Philosopher, University Filmmaker, and Activist (signed 11/13/2018) Suzanne Nossel, CEO, PEN America; former Deputy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WIIS DC Think Tank Gender Scorecard – DATASET 2018 Index/Appendix: American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Foreign and Defense
    • Nonresident Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center for the WIIS DC Think Tank Gender Scorecard – Middle East: Mona Alami (F) DATASET 2018 Index/Appendix: • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center: Laura Albornoz Pollmann (F) • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center for American Enterprise Institute (AEI) the Middle East: Ali Alfoneh (M) Foreign and Defense Policy Scholars in AEI: • Associate Director for Programs, Rafik Hariri Center • Visiting Scholar: Samuel J. Abrams (M) for the Middle East: Stefanie Hausheer Ali (F) • Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Cyber Statecraft Retirement Policy: Joseph Antos (M) Initiative: Dmitri Alperovitch (M) • Resident Scholar and Director of Russian Studies: • Nonresident Fellow, Rafik Hariri Center: Dr. Hussein Leon Aron (M) Amach (M) • Visiting Fellow: John P. Bailey (M) • Nonresident Fellow, Brent Scowcroft Center on • Resident Scholar: Claude Barfield (M) International Security: Dave Anthony (M) • Resident Fellow: Michael Barone (M) • Nonresident Senior Fellow, Global Energy Center: • Visiting Scholar: Robert J. Barro (M) Ragnheiður Elín Árnadóttir (F) • Visiting Scholar: Roger Bate (M) • Visiting Fellow, Brent Scowcroft Center on • Visiting Scholar: Eric J. Belasco (M) International Security/RUSI: Lisa Aronsson (F) • Resident Scholar: Andrew G. Biggs (M) • Executive Vice Chair, Atlantic Council Board of • Visiting Fellow: Edward Blum (M) Directors and International Advisory Board; Chair, • Director of Asian Studies and Resident Fellow: Dan Atlantic Council Business Development and New Blumenthal (M) Ventures Committee; Chairman Emerita, TotalBank • Senior Fellow: Karlyn Bowman (F) (no photo) • Resident Fellow: Alex Brill (M) • Atlantic Council Representative; Director, Atlantic • President; Beth and Ravenel Curry Scholar in Free Council IN TURKEY and Istanbul Summit: Defne Enterprise: Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Conservative Constructions of American Exceptionalism
    Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, Vol. 1, No.2, 2011, pp. 40-54. Contemporary Conservative Constructions of American Exceptionalism Jason A. Edwards Ever since President Obama took office in 2009, there has been an underlying debate amongst politicians, pundits, and policymakers over America’s exceptionalist nature. American exceptionalism is one of the foundational myths of U.S. identity. While analyses of Barack Obama’s views on American exceptionalism are quite prominent, there has been little discussion of conservative rhetorical constructions of this impor- tant myth. In this essay, I seek to fill this gap by mapping prominent American conservatives’ rhetorical voice on American exceptionalism. Keywords: American exceptionalism, conservative rhetoric, jeremiad In April 2009, President Obama travelled to Europe to meet with European leaders in coordinating a strategy to deal with the global financial crisis and to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the NATO alliance. At a news conference in Strasbourg, France, Ed Luce of the Financial Times asked the president whether or not he believed in American ex- ceptionalism. Obama answered by stating, I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British ex- ceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism. I am enormously proud of my country and its role and history in the world . we have a core set of values that are en- shrined in our Constitution, in our body of law, in our democratic practices, in our belief in free speech and equality that, though imperfect, are exceptional. Now, the fact that I am very proud of my country and I think that we‟ve got a whole lot to offer the world does not lessen my interest in recognizing the value and wonderful qualities of other countries or recogniz- ing that we‟re not always going to be right, or that people may have good ideas, or that in order for us to work collectively, all parties, have to compromise, and that includes us.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Griff Witte, the Trump Administration Tried to Save a U.S. University by Playing Nice with an Autocrat
    June 3, 2019 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL U.S. Department of State Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL SA-2, Suite 8100 Washington, DC 20522-0208 [email protected] Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Freedom of Information Officer: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the implementing regulations of the Department of State (State), 22 C.F.R. Part 171, American Oversight makes the following request for records. The United States’ policy towards Hungary has pivoted sharply in the past year, as the influence of Hungary’s far-right Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has reportedly risen within the Trump administration and State’s criticism of Orbán’s human rights record and recent democratic backsliding has waned. In December 2018, the U.S. stood by as Orbán evicted the prestigious university and bastion of academic freedom, Central European University (CEU), from Budapest.1 This month, President Trump hosted Orbán in the White House—the first such visit since 2005.2 When asked in a recent interview about Orbán’s description of his government as an “illiberal democracy,” Trump’s ambassador to Hungary, David Cornstein, responded: “I can tell you, knowing the president for a good 25 or 30 years, that he would love to have the situation that Viktor Orbán has, but he doesn’t.”3 1 Griff Witte, The Trump Administration Tried to Save a U.S. University by Playing Nice with an Autocrat. It Failed., WASH. POST, Nov. 30, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/the-trump-administration-tried-to-save-a-us- university-by-playing-nice-with-an-autocrat-it-failed/2018/11/30/f028718a-e831-11e8-8449- 1ff263609a31_story.html?utm_term=.c4451c348b37; Franklin Foer, Viktor Orbán’s War on Intellect, THE ATLANTIC, June 2019, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/06/george-soros-viktor-orban-ceu/588070/.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Russian Disinformation in Ukraine: Case Studies in a Market for Loyalties
    COMBATING RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION IN UKRAINE: CASE STUDIES IN A MARKET FOR LOYALTIES Monroe E. Price* & Adam P. Barry** I. INTRODUCTION This essay takes an oblique approach to the discussion of “fake news.” The approach is oblique geographically because it is not a discourse about fake news that emerges from the more frequently invoked cases centered on the United States and Western Europe, but instead relates primarily to Ukraine. It concerns the geopolitics of propaganda and associated practices of manipulation, heightened persuasion, deception, and the use of available techniques. This essay is also oblique in its approach because it deviates from the largely definitional approach – what is and what is not fake news – to the structural approach. Here, we take a leaf from the work of the (not-so) “new institutionalists,” particularly those who have studied what might be called the sociology of decision-making concerning regulations.1 This essay hypothesizes that studying modes of organizing social policy discourse ultimately can reveal or predict a great deal about the resulting policy outcomes, certainly supplementing a legal or similar analysis. Developing this form of analysis may be particularly important as societies seek to come to grips with the phenomena lumped together under the broad rubric of fake news. The process by which stakeholders assemble to determine a collective position will likely have major consequences for the * Monroe E. Price is an Adjunct Full Professor at the Annenberg School for Communication and the Joseph and Sadie Danciger Professor of Law at Cardozo School of Law. He directs the Stanhope Centre for Communications Policy Research in London, and is the Chair of the Center for Media and Communication Studies of the Central European University in Budapest.” ** Adam P.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss
    The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss A Special Report presented by The Interpreter, a project of the Institute of Modern Russia imrussia.org interpretermag.com The Institute of Modern Russia (IMR) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy organization—a think tank based in New York. IMR’s mission is to foster democratic and economic development in Russia through research, advocacy, public events, and grant-making. We are committed to strengthening respect for human rights, the rule of law, and civil society in Russia. Our goal is to promote a principles- based approach to US-Russia relations and Russia’s integration into the community of democracies. The Interpreter is a daily online journal dedicated primarily to translating media from the Russian press and blogosphere into English and reporting on events inside Russia and in countries directly impacted by Russia’s foreign policy. Conceived as a kind of “Inopressa in reverse,” The Interpreter aspires to dismantle the language barrier that separates journalists, Russia analysts, policymakers, diplomats and interested laymen in the English-speaking world from the debates, scandals, intrigues and political developments taking place in the Russian Federation. CONTENTS Introductions ...................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................... 6 Background ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment of President Donald John Trump The
    1 116TH CONGRESS " ! DOCUMENT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–95 IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT DONALD JOHN TRUMP THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD PURSUANT TO H. RES. 798 VOLUME XI, PART 7 Historic Materials Printed at the direction of Cheryl L. Johnson, Clerk of the House of Representatives, pursuant to H. Res. 798, 116th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2020) JANUARY 23, 2020.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 39–530 WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:15 Jan 24, 2020 Jkt 039530 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\HD095P29.XXX HD095P29 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JERROLD NADLER, New York, Chairman ZOE LOFGREN, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia, Ranking Member SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., STEVE COHEN, Tennessee Wisconsin HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas KAREN BASS, California JIM JORDAN, Ohio CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana KEN BUCK, Colorado HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island MARTHA ROBY, Alabama ERIC SWALWELL, California MATT GAETZ, Florida TED LIEU, California MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland ANDY BIGGS, Arizona PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington TOM MCCLINTOCK, California VAL BUTLER DEMINGS, Florida DEBBIE LESKO, Arizona J. LUIS CORREA, California GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania MARY GAY SCANLON, Pennsylvania, BEN CLINE, Virginia Vice-Chair KELLY ARMSTRONG, North Dakota SYLVIA R. GARCIA, Texas W. GREGORY STEUBE,
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister Netanyaim Sheraton New York -12K1 'Irsday, July 11, 1996 6:00 PM Ils4 Ity
    New York Welcomes Prime Minister Netanyaim Sheraton New York -12K1 'irsday, July 11, 1996 6:00 PM ILs4 ity Non-transferable Elibi's capital idea Bye-bye to socialism in Israel, he says By DOUGLAS FEIDEN ment-run cartels. anymore, but you'll get in on the Big Board was suspended Daily News Business Writer His address in the gilded the middle floor." for 55 seconds as Netanyahu Israeli Prime Minister Ben- sixth-floor board room of the But he conceded that capi- praised the American free en- jamin Netanyahu blitzed Wall New York Stock Exchange talism will take time to flour- terprise system, chanting, Street yesterday, making an drew such corporate heavy- ish in Israel. Netanyahu said "Buy,sell! Buy, sell!" impassioned pitch for new in- weights as casino king Steve he must dismantle a socialist Down in the trading trench- vestment to Donald Trump Wynn, investment banker Fe- economy he called "one of the es, hundreds of brokers ener- and 200 other business ty- lix Rohatyn and Loews co- most rigid, centralized and bu- gized by Netanyahu's appear- coons. chairman Preston Tisch. reaucratic economic struc- ance raised their voices and Netanyahu invited the busi- "Come to Israel because it's tures in the world." thundered back, "No. Buy, ness leaders to come to Israel good for business,come to Isra- Following his rousing buy, buy!" to make money. He vowed to el because you'll make money," speech, the hard-line Likud Business leaders praised deregulate the economy, pri- Netanyahu said."You won't get leader marched to a balcony Bibi's Wall Street banter.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the NATO Alliance: Upholding Our Shared Democratic Values”
    Prepared Statement for the Record “Democracy and the NATO Alliance: Upholding our Shared Democratic Values” Susan Corke Senior Fellow, German Marshall Fund and Director of Transatlantic Democracy Working Group House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, Energy, and the Environment U.S. House of Representatives November 13, 2019 Chairman Keating, Ranking Member Kinzinger, Distinguished Members of this Committee, thank you for holding this hearing and inviting me to testify before you on an issue that I believe is fundamental to American security and to our role as a leader of the democratic community of nations. It is a particular honor to be here today because Representatives Keating and Kinzinger have been two of the most principled voices in calling for a reinvigoration of democracy and the NATO Alliance as we contend with an era of authoritarian resurgence. On May 8th they both spoke powerfully at an event hosted by German Marshall Fund and the Transatlantic Democracy Working Group on the need to continue fighting for freedom and the ideals we value most, emphasizing this is in America’s interest. Representative Keating asked a pointed question this event, “What do we have that Russia and China don’t have? A coalition, NATO, that has resulted in 70 years of prosperity and peace.” This year is NATO’s 75th birthday and the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall; these anniversaries could have marked the success of the transatlantic project and the triumph of democracy. Instead, it is clear that after seven decades as the world’s preeminent military alliance, NATO’s future is in danger, facing urgent challenges that require immediate attention, including a recommitment to democratic values as a foundation of our security.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980
    Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1980 Robert L. Richardson, Jr. A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2009 Approved by, Michael H. Hunt, Chair Richard Kohn Timothy McKeown Nancy Mitchell Roger Lotchin Abstract Robert L. Richardson, Jr. Neoconservatism: Origins and Evolution, 1945 – 1985 (Under the direction of Michael H. Hunt) This dissertation examines the origins and evolution of neoconservatism as a philosophical and political movement in America from 1945 to 1980. I maintain that as the exigencies and anxieties of the Cold War fostered new intellectual and professional connections between academia, government and business, three disparate intellectual currents were brought into contact: the German philosophical tradition of anti-modernism, the strategic-analytical tradition associated with the RAND Corporation, and the early Cold War anti-Communist tradition identified with figures such as Reinhold Niebuhr. Driven by similar aims and concerns, these three intellectual currents eventually coalesced into neoconservatism. As a political movement, neoconservatism sought, from the 1950s on, to re-orient American policy away from containment and coexistence and toward confrontation and rollback through activism in academia, bureaucratic and electoral politics. Although the neoconservatives were only partially successful in promoting their transformative project, their accomplishments are historically significant. More specifically, they managed to interject their views and ideas into American political and strategic thought, discredit détente and arms control, and shift U.S. foreign policy toward a more confrontational stance vis-à-vis the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190
    DEMOCRACY-2018/09/17 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION WILL DEMOCRACY WIN? THE RECURRING BATTLE BETWEEN LIBERALISM AND ITS ADVERSARIES Washington, D.C. Monday, September 17, 2018 Opening Remarks JOHN R. ALLEN President, The Brookings Institution Panel 1 STEVE INSKEEP, Moderator Host, “Morning Edition,” NPR NORMAN EISEN Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution ROBERT KAGAN Stephen & Barbara Friedman Senior Fellow, Project on International Order and Strategy The Brookings Institution Remarks WILLIAM A. GALSTON Ezra K. Zilkha Chair and Senior Fellow, Governance Studies The Brookings Institution Panel 2 LINDA WERTHEIMER, Moderator Senior National Correspondent, NPR CHARLES BLACK, JR. President, Pentad Plus LLC NORMAN EISEN Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution MARC ROBINSON Professor of English and Theater Studies, Yale University LAURENE SHERLOCK Owner, Greystone Appraisals LLC ALEXANDER TOUSSAINT Deacon * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 500 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 DEMOCRACY-2018/09/17 2 P R O C E E D I N G S GENERAL ALLEN: Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. Welcome to Brookings. I'm John Allen; I'm the president of the Institution. You are most welcome today, and for those coming in by webcast, we welcome you as well. Today we're going to be discussing something concerning many of us at this moment in history. It's the growing tide of illiberalism, as it seems to be threatening increasingly democratic institutions and governments on both sides of the Atlantic. I think it's fair to say that we've learned that democracy is not inevitable and it needs to be understood, it needs to be nurtured, it needs to be cared for, and it needs to be guarded with great vigilance.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to PDF Version
    ResolvedDetails - Agency Information Management System Page 1 of 1 AIMS Agency Information Management System Announcement: If you create a duplicate interaction, please contact Gwen Cannon-Jenkins to have it deleted Resolved Interactions Details Reopen Interaction Resolution Details Title: Interaction Resolved:11/30/2016 34 press calls Resolution Category:Resolved Interaction #: 10260 Response: Like everyone else, we were excited this morning to read Status: Resolved the President-elect’s twitter feed indicating that he wants to be free of conflicts of interest. OGE applauds that goal, which is consistent with an opinion OGE issued in 1983. Customer Information Divestiture resolves conflicts of interest in a way that transferring control does not. We don’t know the details of Source: Press Position: their plan, but we are willing and eager to help them with it. The tweets that OGE posted today were responding only First Name: James Email: (b)(6) ' to the public statement that the President-elect made on Last Name: Lipton Phone: his Twitter feed about his plans regarding conflicts of Title: Reporter - NYT Other Notes: This contact is a stand-in interest. OGE’s tweets were not based on any information contact for the 34 separate news about the President-elect’s plans beyond what was shared organizations who contacted us and who on his Twitter feed. OGE is non-partisan and does not received our statement on the issue. endorse any individual. https://twitter.com/OfficeGovEthics Complexity( Amount Of Time Spent On Interaction:More than 8 Interaction Details hours Initiated: 11/30/2016 Individuals Credited:Leigh Francis, Seth Jaffe Call Origination: Phone Add To Agency Profile: No Assigned: Seth Jaffe Memorialize Content: No Watching: Do Not Destroy: No Questions We received inquires from 34 separate news organizations concerning tweets from OGE's twitter account addressing the President-elect's plans to avoid conflicts of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Nationalism the Most Serious Challenge to Human Rights? Warnings from BREXIT and Lessons from History
    ARTICLE: Is Nationalism the Most Serious Challenge to Human Rights? Warnings from BREXIT and Lessons from History Spring, 2018 Reporter 53 Tex. Int'l L.J. 212 * Length: 17781 words Author: Lauren Fielder* * Professor Fielder is Assistant Dean of Graduate and International Programs and Director of the Institute for Transnational Law at the University of Texas at Austin. Professor Fielder would like to thank Andreas Hallbeck, Tori Clark, and Rio Okawa for their valuable research assistance. Text [*212] Introduction The United Kingdom's decision to exit the European Union is arguably the most momentous event in the European Union's history, and the human rights implications of the exit will be staggering. This Article is part of the important discussion organized around these emerging human rights issues. The decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union reflects a pattern of regression of human rights protection that has been happening around the world in recent years. This decision has given rise to a wave of xenophobia and racism, including a sharp increase in hate crimes in the UK since the exit vote. 1 The decision to leave the EU is also causing a tremendous amount of anxiety for individuals and families who are uncertain about their fate post-Brexit. 2 Furthermore, the United Kingdom's exit may hasten the weakening or breakup of the EU, destabilizing not just the region, but the entire world. This Article does not discuss how Brexit changes the UK's internal framework of human rights protections or how it will impact the UK's relationship with the European Court of Human Rights; rather, the discussion in this Article focuses on the broader human rights implications of a radically altered or non-existent European Union.
    [Show full text]