DOCSLIB.ORG

Possible Lattice Organs in Cretaceous Thylacocephala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Possible Lattice Organs in Cretaceous Thylacocephala Contributions to Zoology, 71 (4) 159-169 (2002) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Possible lattice in Cretaceous organs Thylacocephala Sven Lange & Frederick+R. Schram Institutefor Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University ofAmsterdam, Mauritskade 57, 1092 AD Amsterdam, Netherlands Key words: Thylacocephala, fossils, lattice organs, Thecostraca, Cirripedia, Ascothoracida, Crustacea, Cretaceous. Abstract form has come to be recognized (Pinna et al. 1982; Secretan 1983; Briggs & Rolfe 1983). Typically a reminiscent of the lattice in thecostracan the entire This Structures, organs large carapace envelops body. cara- described from the cuticle ofCretaceous crustaceans, are carapace pace covers the major part of the head and trunk, The lattice like thylacocephalans. new organ structures occur thus obscuring potentially important information similar in pairs along the dorsal midline. While these have a such as Out from under the outline lattice lack do segmentation. carapace to true organs, they seem to pores and two sets of limbs Secretan 1985; Rolfe not occur in the highly apomorphicpattern found in thecostracans. protrude (see three These discrepancies do not easily support earlier ideas of a 1985): a set of pairs of sub-chelate raptorial of the within the thecostracans. position thylacocephalans limbs, and another set forming a posterior battery the lattice for The significance of possible organs inferring a of usually eight (but sometimesmore) small swim- relationship between thylacocephalans and thecostracans is ming limbs. Recently, Lange et al. (2001) described discussed. another set of limbs corresponding to antennules and antennae. In addition to these limbs, a pair of often out from the compound eyes bulge an- Contents large terior of the A of feather- margin carapace. row like near the middle Abstract 159 gills regularly appears region Introduction 159 of the body under the carapace (Rolfe 1985; Secretan review 160 Lattice organs: a & Riou 1983; Schram et al. 1999). Thylacocephala Materials and methods 160 are known from the Silurian (Mikulic et al. 1985; Results 161 Van den Brugghen et al. 1997) through to the Cre- Presence and of lattice 161 position possible organs taceous et al. of in (Schram 1999). Morphology possible lattice organs light microscopy 163 The taxonomic affinities of the thylacocephalans in SEM 163 Morphologyof possible lattice organs remained ‘uncertain’ (Rolfe 1992), although most Reconstruction ofthe morphology ofpossible lattice authors at least implied some kind of crustacean 165 organs affinity. With the recent description of two pairs Discussion 166 of antennae in the Cretaceous thylacocephalan Thy- Acknowledgements 168 al. the References 168 lacocephalus cymolopos Lange et 2001, pos- sible affinity with Crustacea has beenstrengthened. determinationof sister However, a crustacean group Introduction for the Thylacocephala remains vexing. A number of possible and contradictory crustacean relatives Arthropod fossils now placed within the higher have, nevertheless, been suggested based on vari- taxon Thylacocephala have been known since the ous morphological similarities. Secretan (1983) 19th It is only recently that their unique century. considered the possibility of phyllocarids, mala- Downloaded from Brill.com09/23/2021 05:04:55PM via free access 160 S. Lange & F.R. Schram — Possible lattice organs in Cretaceous Thylacocephala and conchostracans sister Schram lattice while costracans as taxa. organs a varying number of ‘extra’ drew with malacostracans based fields have been in the of (1990) comparisons pore registered carapace the sub-chelate on presence of large raptorial limbs other species. Such ‘extra’ fields resemble lattice and but (stomatopods), large eyes well-developed gills organs display a more irregular layout and lack and noted the terminal found in ‘real’ lattice (many eumalacostracans), even some pores most or- potential points of similarity between thylaco- gans (Jensen et al. 1994a). and Arduini et al. first The outline ofthe lattice varies from cephalans remipedes. (1980) organs very drew attention to similarities with thecostracan cir- elongate to roundish; and from a deep depression ripedes, and this was reinforced by Pinna et al. that contains a central raised smooth keel, to simple Rolfe and in the (1985). However, (1985) Schram (1990) flat pore fields level with surrounding cara- this cuticle. Intermediates of these rejected possibility, perhaps too precipitously pace principal types since Schram al. illustrated have less keels with reticulated et (1999: plate 3, fig. 7) may pronounced a the of cuticular that surface the fields. One so-called presence elongate structures comparable to pore evocative of lattice distinct theco- terminal were organs, a pore is often associated with each lattice found the of A rim of cuticle sometimes delimits the lat- stracan apomorphy on carapace some organ. free of thecostracan larvae tice et al. al. swimming stages (Schram organs (Jensen 1994a; Jensen et 1994b). et al. Often are minute structures of 5-10 1999). they pm length and 1-2 width but dimensions with pm vary spe- cies rather and some ‘gigantic’ lattice organs ap- 50 10 width the Lattice organs: a review proach pm length or pm (including in of the surrounding rim) some larger lepadid spe- Thecostracan lattice first described cies et al. organs were by (Jensen 1994a). New evidence Elfimov (1986), Their status as synapomorphies for demonstrates that the lattice or- derived setae et in the Cirripcdia and the Ascothoracida (in the latter gans are (Rybakov al. press) with function group they were initially dubbed cardiac organs, presumably a chemosensory (Hoeg but al. Jensen et al. (1994a) later identified them as et 1998). Dendrites from sensory cells project lattice of into the cuticle and terminate in to the organs on grounds homology) was firmly proximity The terminal the established by Ito & Grygier (1990) and Jensen et pores. larger pore seems most likely for molecules to reach the ele- al. (1994a). Lattice organs have been found in the pathway sensory cyprid larvae of thoracican, acrothoracican, and ments in Facetotecta and Ascothoracida. In Thora- cica and the rhizocephalan Cirripedia as well as in larval stages Rhizocephala, many small pores of the field facilitate ofAscothoracida (Jensen et al. 1994a) andrecently pore may diffusion towards the elements. These reside in the also in Y-larval Facetotecta (Hoeg & Kolbasov sensory pores exo- 2002). The extant crustacean parasite Tantulocarida cuticle with the thin epicuticle coating the walls well and the bottom of In as as the Cambrian Bredocaris have been the pores. Acrothoracica, minute forward as sister of the the but not the brought potential groups pores penetrate epicuticle underly- exocuticle. The of Thecostraca (Walossek et al. 1996; Walossek & ing possession numerous pores Muller but both lack lat- be for the lattice 1998), groups definitely may autapomorphic cirripedian tice within the Thecostraca the et al. & Kolbasov organs. However, organs (Hoeg 1998; Hoeg 2002). number, position and anatomy of lattice organs constitute systematically valuable characters (Hoeg & Kolbasov 2002). Materials and methods the lattice In thecostracans, organ complex nor- mally forms characteristic constellations of two Four Cretaceous thylacocephalan species were examined: Proto- zoeahilgendorfi Dames, 1886; P. damesi 1946; Pseude- clusters containing all together five pairs of lattice Roger, richthus cretaceus Dames, 1886, and Thylacocephalus cymolopos organs. Typically, the anterior cluster contains two Lange et al. (2001). while the includes three pairs posterior usually pairs. Series of possible lattice organs were found in eight speci- some have a reduced number of However, species mens of; Protozoea hilgendorfi: [BM: J 469-1, J 622-1; OR Downloaded from Brill.com09/23/2021 05:04:55PM via free access Contributions to Zoology, 71 (4) - 2002 161 Table 1. Information on fossils well series of lattice like thylacocephalan possessing preserved organs including length (* carapace without rostrum and in of - length posterior spines, mm); body type (**according to Schram et ah, 1999); position organs (ant anterior, mid - mid dorsal, number of and distance between post posterior); organs neighboring organs (in mm). P. hilgendorft Carapace length Body type** Position of series Number of llo’s Average distance mm (estimated*) along midline in each series between illo’s BM J469-1 (40) globose ant 3 0.5 mid 10 0.55 most 7 0.85 BM J622-I 78 elongate ant 12 0,5 mid 7 0.85 post 11 1.5 BM OR 59245 (2)-l 44 elongate mid ~20 0.5 BM OR 59245 (3)-l (50) intermediate postpost 1212 0.82 BM OR 59554 mid - 15-20 (3) (32) globose mid post 15-20 0.40 '-fc* -1 0.5OLn MB A 693.3 (24) globose mid ~13 0.6 MSNM i!2172il2172 42 intermediateintermediate mid 5 0.8 MSNM i20556120556 (30) globose post 4-5 0,7 P. damesi BM OR 59672 15 (4) 8 0.20.2-0.3- 0.3 post , 59245 (2)-l, (3)-1, OR59554 (3). MB: A 693.3. MSNM: il2172, Results 120556] and one specimen of P. damesi [BM: OR 59672 (4)] (see Table 1). Presence and position ofpossible lattice Similar structures occurred in organs sporadically some four speci- mens ofP. hilgendorfi: [BM: PI IC 82; In 42507a; OR 59672 and an additional Our lattice (16)] specimen MSNM: i7586-3, which is of putative organs were best observed in uncertain thylacocephalan affinity. P. of this hilgendorfi. Eight specimens species pre- Further possible lattice were noted, but their organs poor served series of lattice while potential organs, only preservation prevents unequivocal identification:P. hilgendorfi-. one P. damesi preserved such a series. Scattered [BM; PI 1C 76, 83; In 48832 (2), (3); OR 59554 (2), OR 59672 of this organs were observed on an additional (14), (15) and (24). MB: A 693.4, 693.5. MSNM: i7586-l]; P. type damesi: [BM; IC 91-1; OR 59245 (4)-l, OR 59672 (25).] four specimens, whereas another 14 specimens A section (indicated in Fig. 1A) of the posterior showed evidence of what could well also be carapace very along the dorsal midline of one especially well-preserved spe- traces of such structures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remarkable Convergent Evolution in Specialized Parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea)
    Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea) Pérez-Losada, Marcos; Høeg, Jens Thorvald; Crandall, Keith A Published in: BMC Biology DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 Publication date: 2009 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Pérez-Losada, M., Høeg, J. T., & Crandall, K. A. (2009). Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea). BMC Biology, 7(15), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea) Marcos Pérez-Losada*1, JensTHøeg2 and Keith A Crandall3 Address: 1CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Portugal, 2Comparative Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark and 3Department of Biology and Monte L Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA Email: Marcos Pérez-Losada* - [email protected]; Jens T Høeg - [email protected]; Keith A Crandall - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 17 April 2009 Received: 10 December 2008 Accepted: 17 April 2009 BMC Biology 2009, 7:15 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-15 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/7/15 © 2009 Pérez-Losada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnacle Editor Workshop
    Barnacle Editor Workshop VLIZ InnovOcean Site Wandelaarkaai 7 – entrance Pakhuis 61 (UNESCO) B-8400 Oostende, Belgium February 24-28, 2020 Final Report Barnacle Participants: Keith Crandall, Meeting Organizer, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA Jens Hoeg, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Marcos Pérez-Losada, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA Benny Chan, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Henrick Glenner, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Andy Gale, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom Niklas Dreyer, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan WoRMS Data Management Team (DMT): Stefanie Dekeyzer (Meeting Coordinator) Bart Vanhoorne Wim Decock Leen Vandepitte Target Group: The barnacles – more specifically, the broader group of Thecostraca including the traditional barnacles (Cirripedia) as well as the related groups of Facetotecta and Ascothoracida. The thecostracan barnacles rank among the most commonly encountered marine crustaceans in the world. They deviate from almost all other Crustacea in that only the larvae are free-living, while the adults are permanently sessile and morphologically highly specialized as filter feeders or parasites. In the most recent classifications of the crustacean Maxillopoda 1 and latest phylogenetic analyses 2-4 the Thecostraca sensu Grygier 5, comprising the Facetotecta, Ascothoracida, and Cirripedia, form monophyletic assemblages. Barnacle phylogenetics has advanced greatly over the last 10 years. Nonetheless, the relationships and taxonomic status of some groups within these three infraclasses are still a matter of debate. While the barnacles where the focus of Darwin’s detailed taxonomic work, there has not been a comprehensive review of the species of barnacles as a whole since Darwin. As a consequence, the barnacle entries within the WoRMS Database is woefully out of date taxonomically and missing many, many species and higher taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Five New Species of Bathyal Atlantic Ascothoracida (Crustacea: Maxillopoda) from the Equator to 50° N Latitude
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 46(3): 655-<i76, l~ FIVE NEW SPECIES OF BATHYAL ATLANTIC ASCOTHORACIDA (CRUSTACEA: MAXILLOPODA) FROM THE EQUATOR TO 50° N LATITUDE Mark J. Grygier ABSTRACT Five new species of Ascothoracida are described from the Atlantic Ocean at depths of700- 3,500 m: Synagoga paucisetosa new species, host unknown, from 3,459 m in the equatorial Atlantic, based on a male; Synagoga bisetosa new species, host unknown, from about 2,000 m outside the Strait of Gibraltar, based on an immature ?female; Thalassomembracis atlan- ticus new species, host Chrysogorgia quadriplex Thomson, from about 1,450 m SW of the British Isles, based on a female; Zoanthoecus scrobisaccus new species, host Epizoanthus fatuus (M. Schultze), from 927 m near the Azores, based on females, a male, and nauplii; Dendrogaster deformator new species, host Novodinia antillensis (A. H. Clark), from 711 m in the Bahamas, based on females. New specimens of Cardomanica longispinata (Grygier), host Chrysogorgia elegans (Verrill), are recorded from the Lesser Antilles. Both new species of Synagoga have a pair of Waginella-like pits on the front inner surfaces of the carapace valves. Synagoga bisetosa has a unique thoracopod segmentation and is intermediate between other Synagoga species and Waginella in some features. Fouling organisms associated with some specimens of Cardomanica longispinata bring into question the nature of the relation- ship with the host. Naupliar antennule segmentation in Zoanthoecus scrobisaccus seems to be different from that of other ascothoracidans, with implications for maxillopodan system- atics. Dendrogaster deformator is morphologically and ecologically intermediate between other species of Dendrogaster and the closely related genus Bifurgaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Madrepora Oculata in Japan, with Remarks on the Development of Its Spectacular Galls
    58 Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 58-64 (2020) DOI: 10.6119/JMST.202002_28(1).0007 LIVE SPECIMENS OF THE PARASITE PETRARCA MADREPORAE (CRUSTACEA: ASCOTHORACIDA) FROM THE DEEP-WATER CORAL MADREPORA OCULATA IN JAPAN, WITH REMARKS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS SPECTACULAR GALLS Hiroyuki Tachikawa1, Mark J. Grygier2,3, and Stephen D. Cairns4 Key words: coral parasite, gall formation, ahermatypic coral, nau- logical account of the successive stages of gall formation and plius larva. illustrations of the parasites’ nauplius larvae, are presented here. A comparison is made to enlarged corallites in another deep-sea coral, Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus), attributed to ABSTRACT infection by sponges, along with a suggestion of a possible Grossly enlarged corallites, which had earlier been inter- mutualistic benefit to the host of infection by P. madreporae preted as tumors, epibionts, or parasitic galls, on colonies of and a full list of records of Petrarcidae and presumed petrarcid deep-sea scleractinians of the genus Madrepora from various galls from Japan. Indo-Pacific localities, were recognized as galls in 1996 by Grygier and Cairns on account of the new species of as- I. INTRODUCTION cothoracidan crustacean, Petrarca madreporae Grygier, they had found inside enlarged corallites from a site in Indonesia. Deep, cold-water coral “reefs”, with a framework of Here we report the confirmatory recovery of living specimens branching ahermatypic and azooxanthellate scleractinian cor- of P. madreporae from an enlarged corallite of a possibly als of such genera as Lophelia, Oculina, Enallopsammia, undescribed variant of Madrepora oculata Linnaeus in Japan. Solenosmilia, and Madrepora, have become the subject of Two affected coral colonies were taken by fishermen off much recent attention (e.g., Roberts et al., 2009; Hourigan et Katsuura, Chiba Prefecture, at ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remipedia (Crustacea): a Study of Their Reproduction and Ecology Jill Yager Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 1989 The Remipedia (Crustacea): A Study of Their Reproduction and Ecology Jill Yager Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Yager, Jill. "The Remipedia (Crustacea): A Study of Their Reproduction and Ecology" (1989). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/nyyr-wx73 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/102 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REMIPEDIA (CRUSTACEA): A STUDY OF THEIR REPRODUCTION AND ECOLOGY by Jill Yager B.S. June 1967, Colorado State University M.S. June 1982, Florida Institute of Technology A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ECOLOGICAL SCIENCES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August, 1989 Approved inge: • sctor) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT THE REMIPEDIA (CRUSTACEA): A STUDY OF THEIR REPRODUCTION AND ECOLOGY Jill Yager Old Dominion University, 1989 Director: Dr. John R. Holsinger Remipedes are an unusual group of troglobitic crustaceans that live exclusively in anchialine caves. Since their discovery in 1979, nine species have been described, seven of which are found in caves in the West Indies, one from the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and one from the Canary Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusion of the Polyarthra from Harpacticoida and Its Reallocation As an Underived Branch of the Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea)
    Invertebrate Zoology, 1(1): 2951 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2004 Exclusion of the Polyarthra from Harpacticoida and its reallocation as an underived branch of the Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) Hans-Uwe Dahms Hong Kong University of Science and Technology/ Dept. Biology Coastal Marine Lab/ Kowloon Clearwater Bay/ Hong Kong/ SAR China. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: There is no reasonable autapomorphy, either from the naupliar or the adult organization, which justifies a monophylum Harpacticoida (sensu Lang, 1948). This implies a paraphyletic situation of this taxon, comprising two independent monophyletic taxa, the Polyarthra and the Oligoarthra. To solve this problem, the present study will provide justifying arguments for the exclusion of the taxon Polyarthra from the Harpacti- coida, which then is exclusively represented by the monophylum Oligoarthra. When Polyarthra are excluded from the Harpacticoida, than Oligoarthra share the following naupliar synapomorphies: postmaxillar limbs widely spaced, antennal coxa with strong gnathobase, antennal endopodite elongate, mandibular endopodite an elongate process. Based on naupliar characters, Polyarthra are allocated as an underived taxon of the Copepoda, sharing with all other Copepoda the following naupliar characters: antennule 5- segmented, antennal exopodal segments increase from 6 at N I to a final number of 9 at N IV, antennal endopodite is 1-segmented, maxilla absent, swimming performance and life history, dorsocaudal process, antennule segment homologues, larger number of segments in naupliar antennal endo- and exopodites. KEYWORDS: nauplii, development, phylogenetic systematics, ß-systematics, evolution, Polyarthra, Harpacticoida, Copepoda. Èñêëþ÷åíèå ãðóïïû Polyarthra èç Harpacticoida è âûäåëåíèå åå â ïðèìèòèâíóþ âåòâü Copepoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) Ã.-Ó. Äàìñ Hong Kong University of Science and Technology/ Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea Ascothoracida
    CAMPAGNES MUSORSTOM. I & II. PHILIPPINES, TOME 2 — RÉSULTATS DES CAMPAGNES MUSORSTOM. I & IL PHILIPPINES, 12 Crustacea Ascothoracida Mark J. GRYGIER * ABSTRACT Females and larvae of an ascothoracid crustacean, Endaster hamatosculum gen. et sp. nov., are described. They live in large cysts in arms of the sea-star Zoroaster carinatus philippinensis Fisher, 1916. The new genus belongs to the previously monotypic Ctenosculidae and is distinguished from Ctenosculum Heath, 1910, primarily by its wider than long, ellipsoidal carapace, and features of the thorax. The peculiar nauplii have well developed but uniramous antennae and mandibles, and the sexes are separable by the end of naupliar development. The first ascothoracid larva is more generalized than the same stage of other echinoderm-infesting ascothoracids. Endaster's possible utility as a model of the evolutionary grade between Ctenosculum and Ulophy- sema Brattstrom, 1936, is discussed. RESUME Endaster hamatosculum gen. et sp. nov., crustacé ascothoracide parasite de l'astéroïde Zoroaster carinatus philippinensis Fisher, 1916, est décrit. Une étoile de mer infestée oYEndaster porte dans un bras un kyste interne qui s'ouvre à l'extérieur par un petit trou. C'est la deuxième espèce connue de Ctenosculidae, la femelle se distin­ guant du Ctenosculum FÏeath, 1910, par sa carapace en forme d'ellipsoïde latéralement élargi et par son thorax. Les larves naupliennes ont des antennes et des mâchoires uniramées et natatoires, et les sexes sont distincts avant la fin de ce stade. La première larve ascothoracidienne se révèle plus primitive que celles d'autres ascothoracides para­ sites d'échinodermes. Endaster peut représenter le niveau évolutif entre Ctenosculum et Ulophysema Brattstrom, 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascothoracida (Crustacea: Maxillopoda) Parasitic on <I
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. 34(1): 141-169. 1984 CORAL REEF PAPER ASCOTHORACIDA (CRUSTACEA: MAXILLOPODA) PARASITIC ON CHRYSOGORGIA (GORGONACEA) IN THE PACIFIC AND WESTERN ATLANTIC Mark J. Grygler ABSTRACT Seven new species in two genera (one new) of bathyal, gorgonian-infesting ascothoracid crustaceans are described: Isidascus longispinatus new specics on Chrysogorgia cf. elegans north of the Bahamas; Thalassomembracis conquistador new genus and species on Chryso- gorgia sp. in the Moluccas; T. tetraedos new genus and species on C. papillosa in the Macassar Strait; T. bilobus new genus and species on C. cf. papillosa from Hawaii; T. orientalis new genus and species on Chrysogorgia sp. from the Philippines; T. acanthosphaericus new genus and species on same host specimen as I. longispinatus; T. bayeri new genus and species on C. desbonni in the Yucatan Channel. All species are represented by at least one mature female; a putative male is described of T. conquistador. and also nauplii of I. longispinatus, T. conquistador. and T. acanthosphaericus. Isidascus and Thalassomembracis are closely related to Gorgonolaureus Utinomi, and like that genus are classified in the Synagogidae. Most of the new species are attached to their host's axis by single or paired, anterior protrusions of the sometimes bizarrely shaped carapace, and, except for a posteroventral opening, are cov- ered over with host coenenchyme. Thalassomembracis species have small, grapnel-like pro- jections over parts of their carapaces; the four Pacific species may form a monophyletic unit within the genus. I. longispinatus and T. bilobus are often infested with cryptoniscid isopods, and T. tetraedos shares its host with an endoparasitic pycnogonid.
    [Show full text]
  • A Crustacean Endoparasite (Ascothoracida: Synagogidae) of an Antipatharian from Guam
    Micronesica 23(1): 15 - 25, 1990 A Crustacean Endoparasite (Ascothoracida: Synagogidae) of an Antipatharian from Guam MARK J. GRYGIER Sesoko Marine Science Center, University of the Ryukyus, Sesoko, Motobu-cho, Okinawa 905-02 , Japan Abstract-Sessilogoga elongata n. gen. n. sp. is an endoparasite of an unidentified antipatharian from 9 m depth at Guam, living between the host's tissue and skeletal axis. The description is based on a female, males, and nauplius larvae. Sessilogoga is included in the Synagogidae and is very similar to the ectoparasitic genus Synagoga Norman, for which a revised diagnosis is given. The nauplii are similar to those of some Lauridae. Introduction The Ascothoracida are a small superorder of parasitic marine crustaceans that are related to barnacles and infest echinoderms and cnidarians. Grygier ( 1987 c) provides a concise taxonomic review. Although there are fewer than 100 described species, they are interesting because they exhibit a wide range of morphological adaptations to parasitism and yet appear to be fairly primitive members of the crustacean class Maxillopoda. The ascothoracidan order Laurida includes parasites of many different kinds of anthozoans, most often zoanthids, gorgonians, and scleractinian corals. Until now only one species has been reported as an associate of an antipatharian, or black coral, a group that has been extensively exploited commercially. [However, zoanthids overgrowing antipatharians can be infested (Grygier 1985c), and the zoanthid Gerardia savaglia (Bertolini), the host of the ascothoracidan Laura gerardiae de Lacaze-Duthiers, was originally thought to be an antipatharian (de Lacaze-Duthiers 1864).] Synagoga mira Norman, the type-species of its genus, was discovered attached externally to Antipathes larix Esper in the Bay of Naples in 1887 (Norman 1888, 1913), but has not been reported since.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Hoeg Proof Final Version Web.Indd
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 67 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hoeg J.T., Pérez- Losada Marcos, Glenner Henrik, Kolbasov Gregory A., Crandall Keith A. Artikel/Article: Evolution of Morphology, Ontogeny and Life Cycles within the Crustacea Thecostraca 199-217 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 199 67 (2) 199 – 217 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 25.8.2009 Evolution of Morphology, Ontogeny and Life Cycles within the Crustacea Thecostraca JENS T. HØEG 1 *, MARCOS PÉREZ-LOSADA 2, HENRIK GLENNER 3, GREGORY A. KOLBASOV 4 & KEITH A. CRANDALL 5 1 Comparative Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark [[email protected]] 2 CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 3 Marine Organismal Biology, Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway 4 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, White Sea Biological Station, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia 5 Department of Biology & Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 84602-5181, USA * Corresponding author Received 16.iii.2009, accepted 8.vi.2009. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 25.viii.2009. > Abstract We use a previously published phylogenetic analysis of the Thecostraca to trace character evolution in the major lineages of the taxon. The phylogeny was based on both molecular (6,244 sites from 18S rna, 28S rna and H3 genes) and 41 larval morphological characters with broad taxon sampling across the Facetotecta (7 spp.), Ascothoracida (5 spp.), and Cirripedia (3 acrothoracican, 25 rhizocephalan and 39 thoracican spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • Barnacle Editor Workshop, February 24-28 2020
    Barnacle Editor Workshop, February 24-28 2020 Target Group: The barnacles – more specifically, the broader group of Thecostraca including the traditional barnacles (Cirripedia) as well as the related groups of Facetotecta and Ascothoracida. The thecostracan barnacles rank among the most commonly encountered marine crustaceans in the world. They deviate from almost all other Crustacea in that only the larvae are free-living, while the adults are permanently sessile and morphologically highly specialized as filter feeders or parasites. In the most recent classifications of the crustacean Maxillopoda 1 and latest phylogenetic analyses 2-4 the Thecostraca sensu Grygier 5, comprising the Facetotecta, Ascothoracida, and Cirripedia, form monophyletic assemblages. Barnacle phylogenetics has advanced greatly over the last 10 years. Nonetheless, the relationships and taxonomic status of some groups within these three infraclasses are still a matter of debate. While the barnacles where the focus of Darwin’s detailed taxonomic work, there has not been a comprehensive review of the species of barnacles as a whole since Darwin. Contact & Responsible Person for the Workshop: Prof. Keith A. Crandall, PhD. Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA +2027698411, [email protected]. Prof. Crandall has over 20 years of experience in barnacle evolutionary genetics and genomics and has organized multiple workshops around barnacle phylogeny and integration of taxonomy and phylogeny. He is also an active editor of the Decapod crustaceans on WoRMS, specifically the freshwater crayfishes (Astacidea). Thus, Crandall is in an ideal position to bring together the barnacle taxonomic community to update the barnacle taxonomy and implement that update in WoRMS.
    [Show full text]