George W. Bush Library Press
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Building on Results: a Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind Act
Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening The No Child Left Behind Act Secretary Margaret Spellings U.S. Department of Education Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening The No Child Left Behind Act U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Education Margaret Spellings Secretary January 2007 This publication is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind Act, Washington, D.C., 2007. To receive copies of this publication: Write to: ED Pubs, Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, Md. 20794-1398. Fax your request to: 301-470-1244. E-mail your request to: [email protected]. Call in your request toll-free: 1-877-433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS). If 877 service is not yet available in your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN). Those who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY) should call 1-877-576-7734. Order online at: www.edpubs.org. Download it from the Department’s Web site at: www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/nclb/buildingonresults.html. On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print, computer diskette or CD. For more information, contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at 202-260-0852 or 202-260-0818. Contents Introduction. -
Module 4: Unit 3: Lesson 1 Building Background Knowledge: Jigsaw to Build and Share Expertise About the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, Part 1
Grade 5: Module 4: Unit 3: Lesson 1 Building Background Knowledge: Jigsaw to Build and Share Expertise about the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, Part 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Exempt third-party content is indicated by the footer: © (name of copyright holder). Used by permission and not subject to Creative Commons license. GRADE 5: MODULE 4: UNIT 3: LESSON 1 Building Background Knowledge: Jigsaw to Build and Share Expertise about the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, Part 1 Long-Term Targets Addressed (Based on NYSP12 ELA CCLS) I can explain what a text says using quotes from the text. (RI.5.1) I can summarize an informational text. (RI.5.2) I can determine the meaning of academic words or phrases in an informational text. (RI.5.4) Supporting Learning Targets Ongoing Assessment • I can explain recovery and rebuilding efforts in Haiti based on information from President Obama’s • Annotated chunk of President Obama’s opening remarks opening remarks of a speech. • Summary paragraph • I can summarize a chunk of President Obama’s opening remarks. • 2010 Haiti Earthquake concept map • I can determine the meaning of words in context from President Obama’s opening remarks. Copyright © 2013 by Expeditionary Learning, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. NYS Common Core ELA Curriculum • G5:M4:U3:L1 • November 2013 • 1 GRADE 5: MODULE 4: UNIT 3: LESSON 1 Building Background Knowledge: Jigsaw to Build and Share Expertise about the 2010 Haiti Earthquake, Part 1 Agenda Teaching Notes 1. Opening • In this lesson, students are introduced to President Obama’s opening remarks from the speech A. -
No Child Left Behind
Report # 04-04 OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR O L A STATE OF MINNESOTA EVALUATION REPORT No Child Left Behind MARCH 2004 PROGRAM EVALUATION DIVISION Centennial Building - Suite 140 658 Cedar Street - St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: 651-296-4708 • Fax: 651-296-4712 E-mail: [email protected] • Web Site: http://www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us Program Evaluation Division The Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor Auditor. Findings, conclusions, and was established in 1973, replacing the century-old recommendations do not necessarily reflect the Public Examiner’s Office. Its role is to audit and views of the LAC or any of its members. evaluate public programs and ensure accountability for the expenditure of public funds. In 1975, the A list of recent evaluations is on the last page of Legislature created the Program Evaluation this report. A more complete list is available at Division within the auditor’s office. The division’s OLA's website (www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us), as mission, as set forth in law, is to determine the are copies of evaluation reports. degree to which activities and programs entered into or funded by the state are accomplishing their The Office of the Legislative Auditor also includes goals and objectives and utilizing resources a Financial Audit Division, which annually efficiently. conducts a statewide audit of the 25 largest agencies, an audit of federal funds, and Topics for evaluation are approved by the approximately 40 financial and compliance audits Legislative Audit Commission (LAC), a of individual state agencies. The division also 16-member joint, bipartisan commission. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 27 July 2011
United Nations A/66/188 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 July 2011 Original: English Sixty-sixth session Item 133 of the provisional agenda* Programme budget for the biennium 2010-2011 United Nations Office for Partnerships Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to General Assembly decisions 52/466 and 53/475, wherein the Secretary-General was requested to inform the Assembly, on a regular basis, about the activities of the United Nations Office for Partnerships. It supplements the information contained in the previous reports of the Secretary- General (A/53/700 and Add.1, A/54/664 and Add.1-3, A/55/763 and Corr.1, A/57/133, A/58/173, A/59/170, A/60/327, A/61/189, A/62/220, A/63/257, A/64/91 and A/65/347). The United Nations Office for Partnerships serves as a gateway for public- private partnerships with the United Nations system in furtherance of the Millennium Development Goals. The Office oversees the following three areas: (a) The United Nations Fund for International Partnerships (UNFIP) was established by the Secretary-General in March 1998 to serve as the interface for partnership between the United Nations system and the United Nations Foundation — the public charity responsible for administering Robert E. Turner’s $1 billion contribution in support of United Nations causes. As at 31 December 2010, the Office had programmed through UNFIP a total of over $1.17 billion, of which $0.4 billion represents core Turner funds, and $0.7 billion (62 per cent) was generated from other partners, for 507 projects implemented by 43 United Nations entities in 124 countries; * A/66/150. -
Policy Brief #155 the Brookings Institution June 2006
Policy Brief #155 The Brookings Institution June 2006 International Volunteering: Smart Power By Lex Rieffel and Sarah Zalud EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The face of America that has been welcomed most enthusiastically in the rest of the world for decades has been the face of a volunteer: assisting with disaster relief, building houses for poor families, teaching English to university students, and so much more. International volunteer programs contribute directly and indirectly to our nation’s security and well-being. They represent one of the best avenues Americans can pursue to improve relations with the rest of the world. The scale of these programs, however, is far below the levels suggested by their benefits. The federal budget for FY 2006 supports 75,000 AmeriCorps volunteers working domestically but only 7,800 Peace Corps volunteers working in foreign countries. Reflecting the value that Americans see in volunteering overseas, programs in the private sector have grown rapidly in the past ten years. In 2005, at least 50,000 Americans participated in NGO and corporate programs. The number could be much higher, easily more than 100,000, with a program like AmeriCorps that leverages private funding. The number could be doubled again by offering additional options suitable to large pools of talent, such as retiring baby boomers. The potential dividends from scaling up international volunteer programs are impressive relative to most other “soft power” programs of the U.S. government. The time is ripe for a breakthrough in this area, with policies aimed at strengthening existing programs such as increased funding for the Peace Corps, raising the public awareness of volunteer programs overseas, linking service and studie, and measuring effectiveness. -
Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response
Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response Rhoda Margesson Specialist in International Humanitarian Policy Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs February 2, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41023 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Haiti Earthquake: Crisis and Response Summary The largest earthquake ever recorded in Haiti devastated parts of the country, including the capital, on January 12, 2010. The quake, centered about 15 miles southwest of Port-au-Prince, had a magnitude of 7.0. A series of strong aftershocks have followed. The damage is severe and catastrophic. It is estimated that 3 million people, approximately one third of the overall population, have been affected by the earthquake. The Government of Haiti is reporting an estimated 112,000 deaths and 194,000 injured. In the immediate wake of the earthquake, President Preval described conditions in his country as “unimaginable,” and appealed for international assistance. As immediate needs are met and the humanitarian relief operation continues, the government is struggling to restore the institutions needed for it to function, ensure political stability, and address long-term reconstruction and development planning. Prior to the earthquake, the international community was providing extensive development and humanitarian assistance to Haiti. With that assistance, the Haitian government had made significant progress in recent years in many areas of its development strategy. The destruction of Haiti’s nascent infrastructure and other extensive damage caused by the earthquake will set back Haiti’s development significantly. Haiti’s long-term development plans will need to be revised. The sheer scale of the relief effort in Haiti has brought together tremendous capacity and willingness to help. -
A Bipartisan Blueprint
COMMISSION ON POLITICAL REFORM Governing in a Polarized America: A Bipartisan Blueprint to Strengthen our Democracy This report is the product of the BPC Commission on Political Reform with participants of diverse expertise and affiliations, addressing many complex and contentious topics. It is inevitable that arriving at a consensus document in these circumstances entailed compromises. Accordingly, it should not be assumed that every member is entirely satisfied with every formulation in this document, or even that all participants would agree with any given recommendation if it were taken in isolation. Rather, this group reached consensus on these recommendations as a package. The findings and recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the commission and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Bipartisan Policy Center, its founders, or its Board of Directors. Governing in a Polarized America: A Bipartisan Blueprint to Strengthen our Democracy 1 BPC Commission on Political Reform CO-CHAIRS Tom Daschle Dirk Kempthorne Olympia Snowe Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Former Governor of Idaho, U.S. Former U.S. Senator (D-SD); Co-founder, BPC Secretary of the Interior, and U.S. (R-ME); Senior Fellow, BPC Senator (R-ID); President and CEO, Dan Glickman American Council of Life Insurers Former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and U.S. Representative (D-KS); Trent Lott Senior Fellow, BPC Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader (R-MS); Senior Fellow, BPC COMMISSIONERS Hope Andrade Heather Gerken David McIntosh Former Texas Secretary of State (R) J. Skelly Wright Professor of Law, Yale Former U.S. Representative (R-IN); Law School Partner, Mayer Brown LLP Molly Barker Founder, Girls on the Run Michael Gerson Eric L. -
日本国際交流センター JAPAN CENTER for INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE International Philanthropy and Disasters in Developed
日本国際交流センター JAPAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE International Philanthropy and Disasters in Developed Countries The US Response to Japan’s 3.11 Disaster* James Gannon July 2014 I was still fumbling with the lock on the office door when the phone started ringing. It was already late but I had spent the first two hours that morning calling around Tokyo to make sure that my brother and my colleagues were safe after the day’s massive earthquake. When I finally made it inside and picked up the phone, a Congresswoman was on the line to ask for the latest report from Japan and to express her sympathy for the victims of the unfolding tragedy. She was clearly shaken and struggled to maintain her composure. As soon as I put the receiver back in the cradle, it rang again. This time it was a schoolteacher who saw that our organization’s name began with “Japan” and wanted advice on things that her students could do to support relief efforts. By the time that call ended, several of our other lines were lighting up. The ringing was to continue nonstop for weeks to come with calls from hundreds of concerned people around the country from all walks of life who wanted to help Japan in some way. In retrospect, it seems remarkable that the trends that became evident that first day—March 11, 2011—would hold true throughout the American public’s response to the disaster that became known in Japan simply as “3.11”—the 9.0 magnitude earthquake, the towering tsunami, and the chilling crisis that unfolded afterward at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. -
The Effects of the No Child Left Behind Legislation on Career and Technical Education
Career and Technical Education Research, 31(3), pp. 157-174 ©2006 No Curriculum Left Behind: The Effects of the No Child Left Behind Legislation on Career and Technical Education Edward C. Fletcher Jr. The Ohio State University Abstract This manuscript describes the impact of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation on Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs. The manuscript begins with a review of the various aspects of the NCLB legislation, discussing historical legislation leading up to NCLB and emphasizing contemporary issues that affect K- 12 education. The manuscript then addresses the curricula that are left behind due to the increased focus on core academic courses, with an in-depth analysis of how NCLB affects CTE programs. The findings are centered on four areas in which the NCLB policy affects CTE programs: (a) CTE teacher qualifications, (b) the adequate yearly progress (AYP) provision, (c) CTE reform initiatives, and (d) CTE legislation objectives. The manuscript concludes with discussion on the future implications for CTE programs such as the need for increased accountability in CTE teacher education programs and further research on CTE student outcomes Introduction With the growing expectation that all students participate in post-secondary education to be prepared for the future, it is vital to focus on student learning in K- 12, especially at the high school level (Krueger, 2004). To address the challenge of preparing students for success at the postsecondary level, many policymakers believe that an effective comprehensive school reform (CSR) initiative is necessary. One of the most recent and comprehensive school reform initiatives is the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2002, intended to increase accountability for K-12 schools across the nation. -
Table A: List of All Commitments/Contributions and Pledges As of 17 February 2010 (Table Ref: R10)
Table A: List of all commitments/contributions and pledges as of 17 February 2010 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts (Table ref: R10) Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. Donor Channel Description Funding Uncommitted USD Pledges USD 3Com American RC Disaster relief 10,000 0 3M NGOs Working with key humanitarian partners like 1,000,000 0 Project HOPE and MAP International, 3M has donated numerous boxes and cases containing medical supplies such as Nexcare bandages, 3M Tegaderm transparent dressings, sterile drapes, splints, medical tapes and respiratory protection products. 3M continues to work closely with its nonprofit partners to identify other 3M products that may be needed. Abbott Laboratories UN Agencies, In-kind: Donations of medicines and nutritional 1,000,000 0 NGOs and Red products Cross ACE Charitable Foundation American RC Humanitarian assistance 250,000 0 Actavis Group NGOs Donation from Actavis in the US to Americares 10,000 0 and Operation Smile for health response in Haiti. Actavis Group NGOs; Red Donation of generic drugs, including analgesics 2,100,840 0 Cross and antibiotics. Advent Software PIH Humanitarian assistance 0 25,000 Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 478,000 and Relief Agency Adventist Development ADRA-Haiti Emergency assistance 0 522,000 and Relief Agency Aetna Foundation MSF Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation American RC Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Aetna Foundation Food for the Haiti relief efforts 10,000 0 Poor Aetna Foundation UM For medical missions to Port-au-Prince, 10,000 0 including neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons and trauma/emergency physicians. -
Proclamation 7875—National Poison Prevention Week, 2005 March 18
478 Mar. 18 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2005 by the Office of the Press Secretary also included third week of March each year as ‘‘National the remarks of former First Lady Barbara Bush. Poison Prevention Week.’’ Now, Therefore, I, George W. Bush, President of the United States of America, Proclamation 7875—National Poison do hereby proclaim March 20 through March Prevention Week, 2005 26, 2005, as National Poison Prevention March 18, 2005 Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this week by participating in appropriate By the President of the United States ceremonies and activities and by learning of America how to prevent poisonings among children. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set A Proclamation my hand this eighteenth day of March, in National Poison Prevention Week reminds the year of our Lord two thousand five, and us that young children need constant close of the Independence of the United States of supervision by responsible adults to keep America the two hundred and twenty-ninth. them safe. This week highlights the dangers George W. Bush of accidental poisonings, steps that can be taken to reduce risks, and what to do in case [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, of an emergency. 10:03 a.m., March 22, 2005] Poison control centers receive approxi- NOTE: This proclamation will be published in the mately one million calls each year about chil- Federal Register on March 23. dren who have ingested dangerous medicines or chemicals they have found around their homes. Since the first National Poison Pre- vention Week 43 years ago, many deaths and injuries have been prevented through in- Digest of Other creased public awareness, the use of child- White House Announcements resistant packaging, and a national network of poison control centers. -
RE LEADER SPRING 2010 3/31/10 4:47 PM Page 1
RE LEADER SPRING 2010 3/31/10 4:47 PM Page 1 It’sIt’s allall inin thethe familyfamily Spring 2010 ShortShort salessales andand foreclosuresforeclosures NewNew rulesrules forfor RESPARESPA BeforeBefore youyou filefile aa complaintcomplaint Permit No.Permit 574 U.S. POSTAGE Jackson, MS PRSRT STD PRSRT PAID RE LEADER SPRING 2010 3/31/10 11:09 AM Page 2 Real Estate of the Mis The quarte real estate tion on tre resources news abou nity leader k stev RE Ka Betha 2010 Lunch & Learn webinar series D L Where can you get FREE training and April 21 / Noon – 1:00 p.m. timely information delivered straight to Score the latest economic stats from NAR Lawrence Yun, NAR Chief Economist your desk in less than an hour? All you need is a telephone, a computer and June 16 / Noon – 1:00 p.m. D an internet connection! Legal defense and intercepting risk H Oliver E. Frascona, Esq., GRI Real Estate L authors and writings or c Tailgate in your office August 18 / Noon – 1:00 p.m. advertising co essarily endo or gather with other MAR’s Legal Hotline coaching session TORS®. The construed as team members off- Ron Farris, MAR General Counsel regarding fin site. Whether you Mississippi October 20 / Noon – 1:00 p.m. LEADER or its order out, brown- Huddle up to hear the 2010 NAR Mississ bag it or have it President’s perspective J delivered, conven- Vicki Cox Golder, 2010 NAR President ience is the name of the game. December 15 / Noon – 1:00 p.m.