Микротрихии На Мембране Яйцеклада Представителей Ulidiidae И Otitidae (Diptera)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Микротрихии На Мембране Яйцеклада Представителей Ulidiidae И Otitidae (Diptera) 44 БЮЛ. МОСК. О-ВА ИСПЫТАТЕЛЕЙ ПРИРОДЫ. ОТД. БИОЛ. 2015. Т. 120. ВЫП. 4 УДК 595.773.4 МИКРОТРИХИИ НА МЕМБРАНЕ ЯЙЦЕКЛАДА ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЕЙ ULIDIIDAE И OTITIDAE (DIPTERA) Т.В. Галинская У семейств Ulidiidae и Otitidae впервые с помощью методов сканирующей электронной микроскопии были изучены такие тонкие детали морфологии как микротрихии на выворачивающейся мембране яйцекладов. Строение микротрихий связано с особенностями биологии личинок. Показано, что микротрихии помогают достоверно различать самок близких видов. Ключевые слова: Diptera, Ulidiidae, Otitidae, СЭМ, систематика. Брюшко тефритоидных мух состоит из 1–11-го 2003: Figs 310, 317; Micronevrina – Permkam, сегментов. У самок сегменты 1–6-й составляют Hancock, 1995: Fig. 144). Мухи этих групп – об- преабдомен (у самцов преабдомен составляют лигатные фитофаги, и наиболее вероятной являет- 1–5-й сегменты). Первый и второй тергиты брюш- ся «якорная» функция этих шипов при введении ка слиты с образованием синтергита. Первый и яйцеклада в растительную ткань. Гистологических второй стерниты не слиты. Постабдомен самок данных по кутикулярным выростам на выворачи- тефритоидных мух состоит из видоизмененных вающейся мембране яйцеклада не имеется. 7–11-го сегментов, образующих телескопический Нами впервые было рассмотрено строение по- невтяжной яйцеклад. Яйцеклад состоит из 7-го верхности выворачивающейся мембраны яйце- синтергостернита, выворачивающейся мембраны клада представителей Ulidiidae и Otitidae с помо- (покрытой чешуйками или шипиками, с двумя па- щью методов СЭМ (сканирующей электронной рами склеротизированных тяжей) и вершинного микроскопии). членика, акулеуса, или лезвия яйцеклада (состоя- Материал, изученный в ходе данной работы, щего из производных 8–11-го сегментов и вклю- хранится в Зоологическом музее МГУ (Москва) и в чающего 2 части – удлинненного основания и цер- Зоологическом институте РАН (Санкт-Петербург). кального членика). Мембрана яйцеклада считается У семейств Ulidiidae и Otitidae нами впервые производной 7-го сегмента. были исследованы щетинки и микроскульптура Мембрана яйцеклада в проксимальной части яйцекладов с помощью методов сканирующей имеет четыре склеротизированных тяжа: по два электронной микроскопии (СЭМ) и выявлены не- с дорзальной и вентральной сторон. С прокси- которые закономерности. На жестких участках яй- мальной стороны мембрана покрыта различными цеклада обнаружены и щетинки, и шипики. кутикулярными структурами – микротрихиями На мягкой выворачивающейся мембране яй- или шипиками. В спокойном состоянии мембрана цеклада обнаружены только микротрихии или втянута внутрь основного членика яйцеклада (7-го мембрана является голой. Широкие кониче- синтергостернита). При откладке яиц она полно- ские микротрихии выявлены у Physiphora alceae стью или частично выворачивается под давлением (Preyssler, 1791) (рисунок, a), Homalocephala жидкости в брюшке. apicalis (Wahlberg, 1839) (рисунок, б), Ceroxys В дистальной части мембрана несет различные cinifera (Loew, 1846), Ceroxys munda (Loew, 1869), кутикулярные выросты, вероятно, микротрихии Seioptera vibrans (Linnaeus, 1758). Узкие кониче- (Richards, Richards, 1979). Предполагают (Корне- ские сенсиллы характерны для представителей ев, 2004), что эти выросты создают неравномерно родов Timia и Ulidia (рисунок, в). Голая мембрана направленную силу трения, что препятствует сво- была нами отмечена для видов: Euxesta pechumani рачиванию яйцеклада. Микротрихии на выворачи- Curran, 1938 (рисунок, г), Otites formosa (Panzer, вающейся мембране яйцеклада часто рассматри- 1798). У Melieria omissa (Meigen, 1826) они спец- ваются в систематических целях. Кутикулярные ифической листовидной формы (рис 1, д), а у выросты были изучены у многих представителей Melieria crassipennis (Fabricius, 1794) – листовид- Tephritidae (Han, Freidberg, 1994; Korneyev, 1994) с ной с крючками на вершине (рисунок, е). помощью световой микроскопии. Также они были Представители примитивных родов Tephritidae изучены у Platystomatidae (Furcamyia – Whittington, являются сапрофагами, а продвинутые – фито- БЮЛ. МОСК. О-ВА ИСПЫТАТЕЛЕЙ ПРИРОДЫ. ОТД. БИОЛ. 2015. Т. 120. ВЫП. 4 45 Микротрихии на выворачивающейся мембране яйцеклада Ulidiidae и Otitidae: a – Physiphora alceae (Preyssler, 1791); б – Homalocephala apicalis (Wahlberg, 1839); в – Ulidia erythrophthalma Meigen, 1826; г – Euxesta pechumani Curran, 1938; д – Melieria omissa (Meigen, 1826); е – Me- lieria crassipennis (Fabricius, 1794) фагами на стадии личинки. Ulidiidae и Otitidae, дывает яйца непосредственно внутрь субстрата. в отличие от сестринской и более продвинутой Выворачивающаяся мембрана яйцеклада самок группы Tephritidae, на личиночной стадии в ос- изученных представителей этих родов не несет новном являются сапрофагами или копрофагами кутикулярных выростов или несет разреженные (Каменева, 2000). Тем не менее наблюдается видо- небольшие (5–10 мкм длиной) микротрихии. специфичность микротрихий на мембране видов Такое строение мембраны не препятствует сво- улидиид и отитид. Виды родов Physiphora, Timia, бодному проникновению яйцеклада под поверх- Ulidia и Euxesta являются копрофагами на личи- ность различного субстрата и позволяет этим ночной стадии. Личинки развиваются на экскре- мухам оставаться полифагами. Личинки рода ментах широкого круга животных. Самка откла- Homalocephala развиваются под корой листвен- 46 БЮЛ. МОСК. О-ВА ИСПЫТАТЕЛЕЙ ПРИРОДЫ. ОТД. БИОЛ. 2015. Т. 120. ВЫП. 4 ных и хвойных деревьев; мембрана яйцеклада клада, обусловленная, вероятно, тем, что разные несет короткие (3–5 мкм) микротрихии. Личинки виды Melieria развиваются на разных видах рас- рода Melieria развиваются на стеблях и корнях тений, может служить надежным определитель- растений, причем имеют видовые предпочтения ным признаком при изучении близких видов рода. по субстрату. Мембрана яйцеклада видов этого Например, у Melieria omissa микротрихии имеют рода несет длинные (15–20 мкм) микротрихии. Ве- специфическую листовидную форму (рис 1, д), а роятно, откладка яиц в разлагающиеся раститель- у Melieria crassipennis – листовидную с крючками ные субстраты связана с большей необходимостью на вершине (рисунок, е). Это перспективный вы- заякоривать яйцеклад. Специфичность формы ми- вод, так как определение видов Ulidiidae сейчас с кротрихий на выворачивающейся мембране яйце- большей достоверностью производят по самцам. Сбор материала для данной статьи был профинансирован грантами РФФИ № 13-04-01638 и № 14- 04-31932_мол_а. Обработка материала и получение изображений были профинансированы грантом РНФ № 14-50-00029 «Научные основы создания национального банка-депозитария живых систем». СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ Каменєва О.П. Мухи-стрічкокрилки (Diptera, Ulidiidae) ritidae / O’Hara J.F. (Ed.), Third International Congress Палеарктики (фауна, морфологія, систематика). Дис. of Dipterology. Abstract volume. Guelph: University of … канд. біол. наук. Київ, 2000. 332 с. Guelph. 1994. P. 112–113. Корнєєв В.О. Мухи тефритоїдного комплексу (Diptera, Permkam S., Hancock D.L. Australian Trypetinae (Diptera: Platystomatidae, Pyrgotidae, Tephritidae) Палеарктики Tephritidae) // Invertebrate Taxonomy. 1995. Vol. 9. (філогенія, систематика, трофічні зв’язки, поширення). P. 1047–1209. Дис. … докт. біол. наук. Київ, 2004. 789 с. Richards, A.G., Richards P.A. The cuticular protuberances of Han H.-Y., Freidberg A. Pseudomyoleja, a new Afrotropical insects // International Journal of Insect Morphology and genus of Tephritidae (Diptera) // Journal of African Zool- Embryology. 1979. Vol. 8. P. 143–157. ogy. 1994. Vol. 108. N 6. P. 547–554. Whittington A.E. Taxonomic revision of the Afrotropical Korneyev V.A. Monophyly, groundplan and sister-groups Plastotephritinae (Diptera, Platystomatidae) // Studia Dip- in the families Pyrgotidae, Platystomatidae and Teph- terologica. Supplement. 2003. Vol. 12. 300 p. Поступила в редакцию 24.04.15 MICROTRICHIA ON THE OVIPOSITOR EVERSIBLE MEMBRANE OF ULIDIIDAE AND OTITIDAE (DIPTERA) T.V. Galinskaya Microtrichia, situated on the ovipositor eversible membrane of Ulidiidae and Otitidae were studied using SEM (scanning electronic microscope) for the fi rst time. Microtrichia structure is correlated with the larvae biology. Microtrichia structure can authentically distinguish females of closely related species. Key words: Diptera, Ulidiidae, Otitidae, SEM, systematics. Сведения об авторе: Галинская Татьяна Владимировна – науч. сотр. кафедры энтомологии биологического факультета МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова, канд. биол. наук ([email protected]). .
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • Superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- Tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää
    20 © Sahlbergia Vol. 12: 20–32, 2007 Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Dip- tera: Brachycera) Kaj Winqvist & Jere Kahanpää Winqvist, K. & Kahanpää, J. 2007: Checklist of Finnish flies: superfamilies Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea (Diptera: Brachycera). — Sahlbergia 12:20-32, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1237-3273. Another part of the updated checklist of Finnish flies is presented. This part covers the families Lonchaeidae, Pallopteridae, Piophilidae, Platystomatidae, Tephritidae, Ulididae, Coelopidae, Dryomyzidae, Heterocheilidae, Phaeomyii- dae, Sciomyzidae and Sepsidae. Eight species are recorded from Finland for the first time. The following ten species have been erroneously reported from Finland and are here deleted from the Finnish checklist: Chaetolonchaea das- yops (Meigen, 1826), Earomyia crystallophila (Becker, 1895), Lonchaea hirti- ceps Zetterstedt, 1837, Lonchaea laticornis Meigen, 1826, Prochyliza lundbecki (Duda, 1924), Campiglossa achyrophori (Loew, 1869), Campiglossa irrorata (Fallén, 1814), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Dioxyna sororcula (Wie- demann, 1830) and Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856). The Finnish records of Lonchaeidae: Lonchaea bruggeri Morge, Lonchaea contigua Collin, Lonchaea difficilis Hackman and Piophilidae: Allopiophila dudai (Frey) are considered dubious. The total number of species of Tephritoidea and Sciomyzoidea found from Finland is now 262. Kaj Winqvist, Zoological Museum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Email: [email protected] Jere Kahanpää, Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland. Email: kahanpaa@iki.fi Introduction new millennium there was no concentrated The last complete checklist of Finnish Dipte- Finnish effort to study just these particular ra was published in Hackman (1980a, 1980b). groups. Consequently, before our work the Recent checklists of Finnish species have level of knowledge on Finnish fauna in these been published for ‘lower Brachycera’ i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Insects of the Rocky Mountain States
    Household Insects of the Rocky Mountain States Bulletin 557A January 1994 Colorado State University, University of Wyoming, Montana State University Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Milan Rewerts, interim director of Cooperative Extension, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Cooperative Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. No endorsement of products named is intended nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned. FOREWORD This publication provides information on the identification, general biology and management of insects associated with homes in the Rocky Mountain/High Plains region. Records from Colorado, Wyoming and Montana were used as primary reference for the species to include. Mention of more specific localities (e.g., extreme southwestern Colorado, Front Range) is provided when the insects show more restricted distribution. Line drawings are provided to assist in identification. In addition, there are several lists based on habits (e.g., flying), size, and distribution in the home. These are found in tables and appendices throughout this manual. Control strategies are the choice of the home dweller. Often simple practices can be effective, once the biology and habits of the insect are understood. Many of the insects found in homes are merely casual invaders that do not reproduce nor pose a threat to humans, stored food or furnishings. These may often originate from conditions that exist outside the dwelling. Other insects found in homes may be controlled by sanitation and household maintenance, such as altering potential breeding areas (e.g., leaky faucets, spilled food, effective screening).
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Marsh Assemblages and Site Classification Using Invertebrates English Nature Research Reports
    Report Number 579 Grazing marsh assemblages and site classification using invertebrates English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 579 Grazing marsh assemblages and site classification using invertebrates C. M. Drake 2004 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2004 Acknowledgements Many people helped in supplying reports, references and advice for this project: Stephen Parker, Kristoffer Hewitt, Chris McMullon, Chris Gibson, Patrick Robinson, John Jackson and Simon Christian (English Nature); Andy Foster (National Trust); Jeff Edwards (Hampshire County Council); Merle Leeds, Susan Elsom and Rob Drydon (Environment Agency); Martin Harvey, Clive Chatters and Bob Chapman (Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust); Graeme Lyons and Mark Telfer (RSPB); Derek Lott (Leicestershire Museum); and especially individuals who have undertaken some of the work - Andy Godfrey, Mike Edwards, Peter Hodge, Peter Kirby, Martin Willing, Ian Killeen and Rob Driscoll. I apologise to anyone whose data appears to be missing from this report. I am most grateful to Jon Webb of English Nature for providing the opportunity to undertake the analysis. Summary 1. A literature review highlights some of the most important outcomes of many unpublished surveys as well as those in formal publications. 2. 295 species showing high constancy in 41 of surveys aquatic fauna and 31 surveys of ‘terrestrial’ wetland species are given fidelity scores on a three-point scale. 3. Over 180 grazing marshes are ranked for their importance for the grazing marsh assemblage using the importance categories of county, regional, national, or of less than county importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Download From
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Dr. Sálim Javed Manager, Terrestrial Assessment & Conservation Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi Designation date Site Reference Number PO Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, UAE Tel: +971-2-6934711 Mob: +971-50-6166405 Fax: +971-2-4997282 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Shaikha Al Dhaheri Executive Director, Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity Sector Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi PO Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, UAE Tel: +971-2-6934545 Mob: +971-50- Fax: +971-2-4997282 E-mail: [email protected] Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Myennidini, a New Tribe of Otitinae (Diptera: Ulidiidae)
    BIOTAXONOMY OF TEPHRITOIDEA Isr. J. Entomol. Vol. 35-36, 2005/6, pp. 497-586 Myennidini, a New Tribe of the Subfamily Otitinae (Diptera: Ulidiidae), with Discussion of the Suprageneric Classification of the Family Elena Kameneva1 and Valery Korneyev2 ABSTRACT The diagnoses of all six tribes of Ulidiidae are revised. The Myennidini, new tribe (subfamily Otitinae), is defined to include 14 genera: Myennis Robineau- Desvoidy, Oedopa Loew, Stictomyia Bigot, Paroedopa Coquillett, Pseudotephritis Johnson, Callopistromyia Hendel, Stictoedopa Brèthes, Pseudotephritina Malloch, Dyscrasis Aldrich, Ulidiotites Steyskal, Pseudodyscrasis Hernández, Arborotites Barraclough, Namibotites Barraclough, and Neodyscrasis Kameneva and Korneyev, n. gen. (type species: Pseudodyscrasis steyskali Hernández, 1988). These genera were previously erroneously assigned either to the Ulidiini or to the Pterocallini; the latter tribe is shown here to belong to the subfamily Ulidiinae. A phylogenetic analysis is provided for the tribes of Ulidiidae and the genera of Myennidini. Most genera are redescribed, and the distributions of all the species are discussed, including new records. The following synonymy is established: Myennis tricolor Hendel, 1909 = Myennis nebulosa Krivosheina and Krivosheina, 1997, n. syn. Pterotaenia Rondani, 1868 is resurrected from synonymy with Ceroxys Macquart. 1Division of General and Applied Entomology, the I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected]. 2Laboratory of Biogeography, the I.I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected]. BIOTAXONOMY OF TEPHRITOIDEA INTRODUCTION The family Ulidiidae belongs to the Higher Tephritoidea, a monophyletic group also containing the Platystomatidae, Pyrgotidae and Tephritidae (Korneyev, 1999). Relationships among the higher taxa in this group were discussed by Hennig (1958), J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 84 Autumn 2017 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Rob Wolton Vice Chairman Howard Bentley Secretary Amanda Morgan Meetings Treasurer Phil Brighton Please use the Booking Form downloadable from our website Membership Sec. John Showers Field Meetings Field Meetings Sec. vacancy Now organised by several different contributors, contact the Secretary. Indoor Meetings Sec. Martin Drake Publicity Officer Erica McAlister Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Conservation Officer vacant Martin Drake [email protected] Ordinary Members Bulletin contributions Stuart Ball, Malcolm Smart, Peter Boardman, Victoria Burton, Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Tony Irwin, Martin Harvey, Chris Raper Dipterists Bulletin Editor Unelected Members Darwyn Sumner 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Tel. 0116 212 5075 [email protected] Secretary Assistant Editor Amanda Morgan Judy Webb Pennyfields, Rectory Road, Middleton, Saxmundham, Suffolk, IP17 3NW 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. [email protected] Tel. 01865 377487 [email protected] Treasurer Phil Brighton [email protected] Dipterists Digest contributions Deposits for DF organised field meetings to be sent to the Treasurer Dipterists Digest Editor Conservation Peter Chandler Robert Wolton (interim contact, whilst the post remains vacant) 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL Tel. 01225-708339 Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ [email protected] Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.3 ES Appendix
    Environmental Statement Appendix 9 .C (6.3.9.3) Invertebrate Survey Report April 2016 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK Page 2 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Commissioned by Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd 3rd Floor Manning House 22 Carlisle Place SW1P 1JA INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT Report number BS/2864/14 January 2015 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 14 West Road Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 3QP 01279-507697 [email protected] Page 3 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colin Plant Associates (UK) are pleased to credit the input of the following in-house personnel: Field work for this project has been undertaken by Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Colin W. Plant Identification of samples has been undertaken by many parties, prominent amongst which are Marcel Ashby Tristan Bantock Norman F. Hall* Edward Milner* Colin W. Plant Derek (“Del”) Smith* *denotes an external expert Page 4 of 62 Silvertown Tunnel Appendix 9.C Invertebrate Survey Report Document Reference: 6.3.9.3 Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 7 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Wallace, Charles Reid. A
    ABSTRACT WALLACE, CHARLES REID. A Molecular and Morphological Analysis of Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea). (Under the direction of Brian M. Wiegmann). Ulidiidae (Diptera: Tephritoidea) is a relatively small family of true flies, called the “picture-winged flies” for their patterned wings. Its relationship to the other members of Tephritoidea, and its monophyly, has been well established, through both morphological and molecular analysis. Its subfamilial relationships, however, have received limited molecular analysis, having had a significant cross-section of the family’s taxa represented in only two molecular studies (Galinskaya et al. 2014, Han and Ro 2016). The most contemporary treatment of the classification of the family is by Kamenev and Korneyev (2006), according to which the Ulidiidae is divided into two subfamilies (Otitinae, Ulidiinae), each of which is further delineated into tribes (Cephaliini, Myennidini, Otitini; Lipsanini, Pterocallini, Seiopterini, Ulidiini, respectively), with an additional incertae sedis group of genera within the Otitinae. These classifications are based solely on morphological analysis, and there remain multiple outstanding questions of the placement and monophyly regarding the tribes or several large, diverse, or enigmatic genera. Here, using the next-generation sequencing method of anchored hybrid enrichment, I investigate the phylogeny of Ulidiidae with particular attention paid to the constituency and monophyly of hypothesized tribes, monophyly of the two sub-families, and placement of genera. Through maximum likelihood analysis, my results establish strong support for the separation of Ulidiidae into two monophyletic subfamilies, but challenges the assignment of Myennidini to the Ulidiidae, and potentially of Seiopterini to the Ulidiinae. It additionally suggests the paraphyly of the tribe Pterocallini with respect to both Myennidini and Lipsanini, but supports the monophyly of all other tribes.
    [Show full text]