Environmental Protection Agency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Protection Agency Vol. 80 Friday, No. 205 October 23, 2015 Part II Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 60, 70, 71, et al. Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 22, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM 23OCR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 64510 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 205 / Friday, October 23, 2015 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center FOAK First-of-a-kind AGENCY (EPA/DC), Room 3334, EPA WJC West FR Federal Register Building, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., GHG Greenhouse Gas 40 CFR Parts 60, 70, 71, and 98 Washington, DC. The Public Reading GHGRP Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program GPM Gallons per Minute [EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0495; EPA–HQ–OAR– Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 GS Geologic Sequestration 2013–0603; FRL–9930–66–OAR] p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding GW Gigawatts legal holidays. The telephone number H2 Hydrogen Gas RIN 2060–AQ91 for the Public Reading Room is (202) HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant HFC Hydrofluorocarbon Standards of Performance for 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. HRSG Heat Recovery Steam Generator Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, IGCC Integrated Gasification Combined FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Modified, and Reconstructed Cycle Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Nick Hutson, Energy Strategies Group, IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Generating Units Sector Policies and Programs Division Change (D243–01), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle IPM Integrated Planning Model AGENCY: Environmental Protection Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919) IRPs Integrated Resource Plans Agency (EPA). 541–2968, facsimile number (919) 541– kg/MWh Kilogram per Megawatt-hour ACTION: Final rule. 5450; email address: hutson.nick@ kJ/kg Kilojoules per Kilogram epa.gov or Mr. Christian Fellner, Energy kWh Kilowatt-hour SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Strategies Group, Sector Policies and lb CO2/MMBtu Pounds of CO2 per Million British Thermal Unit Agency (EPA) is finalizing new source Programs Division (D243–01), U.S. EPA, performance standards (NSPS) under lb CO2/MWh Pounds of CO2 per Megawatt- Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; hour Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(b) that, telephone number (919) 541–4003, lb CO2/yr Pounds of CO2 per Year for the first time, will establish facsimile number (919) 541–5450; email lb/lb-mole Pounds per Pound-Mole standards for emissions of carbon address: [email protected]. LCOE Levelized Cost of Electricity dioxide (CO2) for newly constructed, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Acronyms. MATS Mercury and Air Toxic Standards modified, and reconstructed affected A number of acronyms and chemical MMBtu/hr Million British Thermal Units fossil fuel-fired electric utility symbols are used in this preamble. per Hour generating units (EGUs). This action MRV Monitoring, Reporting, and While this may not be an exhaustive Verification establishes separate standards of list, to ease the reading of this preamble performance for fossil fuel-fired electric MW Megawatt and for reference purposes, the MWe Megawatt Electrical utility steam generating units and fossil following terms and acronyms are MWh Megawatt-hour fuel-fired stationary combustion defined as follows: MWh-g Megawatt-hour gross turbines. This action also addresses MWh-n Megawatt-hour net AB Assembly Bill related permitting and reporting issues. N O Nitrous Oxide AEO Annual Energy Outlook 2 In a separate action, under CAA section AEP American Electric Power NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality 111(d), the EPA is issuing final emission ANSI American National Standards Standards guidelines for states to use in Institute NAICS North American Industry Classification System developing plans to limit CO2 emissions ASME American Society of Mechanical from existing fossil fuel-fired EGUs. Engineers NAS National Academy of Sciences BACT Best Available Control Technology NETL National Energy Technology DATES: This final rule is effective on Laboratory October 23, 2015. The incorporation by BDT Best Demonstrated Technology BSER Best System of Emission Reduction NGCC Natural Gas Combined Cycle th reference of certain publications listed Btu/kWh British Thermal Units per NOAK n -of-a-kind in the rule is approved by the Director Kilowatt-hour NRC National Research Council of the Federal Register as of October 23, Btu/lb British Thermal Units per Pound NSPS New Source Performance Standards 2015. CAA Clean Air Act NSR New Source Review NTTAA National Technology Transfer and ADDRESSES: CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule The EPA has established Advancement Act dockets for this action under Docket ID CBI Confidential Business Information CCS Carbon Capture and Storage (or O2 Oxygen Gas No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0495 Sequestration) OMB Office of Management and Budget (Standards of Performance for CDX Central Data Exchange PC Pulverized Coal Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New CEDRI Compliance and Emissions Data PFC Perfluorocarbon Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Reporting Interface PM Particulate Matter Generating Units) and Docket ID No. CEMS Continuous Emissions Monitoring PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0603 (Carbon System PRA Paperwork Reduction Act Pollution Standards for Modified and CFB Circulating Fluidized Bed PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration CH4 Methane PUC Public Utilities Commission Reconstructed Stationary Sources: RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Electric Utility Generating Units). All CHP Combined Heat and Power CO2 Carbon Dioxide Act documents in the dockets are listed on CSAPR Cross-State Air Pollution Rule RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act the www.regulations.gov Web site. DOE Department of Energy RGGI Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Although listed in the index, some DOT Department of Transportation RIA Regulatory Impact Analysis information is not publicly available, ECMPS Emissions Collection and RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard e.g., Confidential Business Information Monitoring Plan System RTC Response to Comments or other information whose disclosure is EERS Energy Efficiency Resource Standards RTP Response to Petitions restricted by statute. Certain other EGU Electric Generating Unit SBA Small Business Administration SCC Social Cost of Carbon material, such as copyrighted material, EIA Energy Information Administration EO Executive Order SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction will be publicly available only in hard EOR Enhanced Oil Recovery SCPC Supercritical Pulverized Coal copy. Publicly available docket EPA Environmental Protection Agency SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act materials are available either FB Fluidized Bed SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride electronically in www.regulations.gov or FGD Flue Gas Desulfurization SIP State Implementation Plan VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 22, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23OCR2.SGM 23OCR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 205 / Friday, October 23, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 64511 SNCR Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction D. Post-Combustion Carbon Capture B. New Combustion Turbines SO2 Sulfur Dioxide E. Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture C. Modified and Reconstructed Steam and SSM Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction F. Vendor Guarantees, Industry Statements, NGCC Units Tg Teragram (one trillion (1012) grams) Academic Literature, and Commercial XII. Interactions With Other EPA Programs Tpy Tons per Year Availability and Rules TSD Technical Support Document G. Response to Key Comments on the A. Overview TTN Technology Transfer Network Adequacy of the Technical Feasibility B. Applicability of Tailoring Rule UIC Underground Injection Control Demonstration Thresholds Under the PSD Program UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of H. Consideration of Costs C. Implications for BACT Determinations 1995 I. Key Comments Regarding the EPA’s Under PSD U.S. United States Consideration of Costs D. Implications for Title V Program USDW Underground Source of Drinking J. Achievability of the Final Standards E. Implications for Title V Fee Water K. Emission Reductions Utilizing Partial Requirements for GHGs USGCRP U.S. Global Change Research CCS F. Interactions With Other EPA Rules Program L. Further Development and Deployment XIII. Impacts of This Action VCS Voluntary Consensus Standard of CCS Technology A. What are the air impacts? WGS Water Gas Shift M. Technical and Geographic Aspects of B. Endangered Species Act WWW World Wide Web Disposition of Captured CO2 C. What are the energy impacts? Organization of This Document. The N. Final Requirements for Disposition of D. What are the water and solid waste information presented in this preamble Captured CO2 impacts? O. Non-Air Quality Impacts and Energy is organized as follows: E. What are the compliance costs? Requirements F. What are the economic and employment I. General Information P. Options That Were Considered by the impacts? A. Executive Summary EPA But Were Ultimately Not G. What are the benefits of the final B. Does this action apply to me? Determined to Be the BSER standards? C. Where can I get a copy of this Q. Summary XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews document? VI. Rationale for Final Standards for A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory D. Judicial Review Modified Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Planning and Review and Executive E. How is this preamble organized? Utility Steam Generating
Recommended publications
  • Energy & the Environment: a Way Forward for Coal
    Energy & the Environment: A way forward for coal - the Kemper project Ed Holland Mississippi Power President and CEO October 9, 2014 Kemper: 582-MW Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle facility with pre-combustion carbon capture How it works: Fully Integrated Design Liberty Mine Zero Liquid discharge: Process Water Output Byproducts Kemper: Redefining Energy Sustainability 25% Coal 75% • Fuel diversity Natural Gas • Fuel price stability • Secure, reliable power 2020 energy mix without Kemper • Zero liquid discharge 20% 25%Coal 20% • Captured carbon used in enhanced Coal Lignite oil recovery 60% • Byproduct revenue Natural Gas * Includes unit retirement and fuel switch announcements (7/4/14) 2020 energy mix with Kemper * CO2 Utilization – Commodity not Waste Kemper: Why it works in Mississippi • Lignite mine mouth – 31,000 acre mine site • Enhanced oil recovery – 60 mile CO2 Pipeline for EOR • Meridian treated effluent – 30 miles of treated effluent pipeline • Transmission – 70 new miles • Off Gulf Coast – 80% Current Generation on Gulf Coast Safety • Industry leaders in maintaining a safe workplace – through every area of the company • .54 Project Recordable Incident Rate – 3-5 times safer than Construction Industry Average • 28 Million Man-hours – 14,000 FTE for a year Economic Benefits • $1 Billion in Mississippi contracts • 12,000 direct and indirect jobs • 500 Mississippi companies • 500 permanent employees • $75 Million state and local taxes during construction • $30 Million state and local taxes annually in operation Project Current Status Construction • Essentially complete except for heat tracing & insulation. Support for startup and operations now through COD Startup • Gasifier first-fire is expected in the 4th quarter. Operations • Plant staff at 173, planning for 220 by COD.
    [Show full text]
  • "Implementing EPA's Clean Power Plan: a Menu of Options," NACAA
    Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options May 2015 Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options Acknowledgements On behalf of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA), we are pleased to provide Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options. Our association developed this document to help state and local air pollution control agencies identify technologies and policies to reduce greenhouse gases from the power sector. We hope that states and localities, as well as other stakeholders, find this document useful as states prepare their compliance strategies to achieve the carbon dioxide emissions targets set by the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. NACAA would like to thank The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) for its invaluable assistance in developing this document. We particularly thank Rich Sedano, Ken Colburn, John Shenot, Brenda Hausauer, and Camille Kadoch. In addition, we recognize the contribution of many others, including Riley Allen (RAP), Xavier Baldwin (Burbank Water and Power [retired]), Dave Farnsworth (RAP), Bruce Hedman (Institute for Industrial Productivity), Chris James (RAP), Jim Lazar (RAP), Carl Linvill (RAP), Alice Napoleon (Synapse), Rebecca Schultz (independent contractor), Anna Sommer (Sommer Energy), Jim Staudt (Andover Technology Partners), and Kenji Takahashi (Synapse). We would also like to thank those involved in the production of this document, including Patti Casey, Cathy Donohue, and Tim Newcomb (Newcomb Studios). We are grateful to Stu Clark (Washington) and Larry Greene (Sacramento, California), co-chairs of NACAA’s Global Warming Committee, under whose guidance this document was prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RESCUE of ALSTOM Patrick Kron
    http://www.ecole.org Seminar Business Life THE RESCUE OF ALSTOM Organised thanks to the patronage of the following companies : Air France Algoé2 by Alstom ANRT ArcelorMittal Patrick Kron Areva2 Cabinet Regimbeau1 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alstom Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations CEA Chaire “management de l’innovation” de l'École polytechnique December 7th, 2007 Chambre de Commerce et d'Industrie de Paris Report by Thomas Paris CNRS Translation by Rachel Marlin Conseil Supérieur de l'Ordre des Experts Comptables Danone Deloitte École des mines de Paris Overview EDF Entreprise & Personnel In 2003, Alstom was on the verge of bankruptcy. How could an ESCP-EAP Fondation Charles Léopold Mayer international, industrial company, more than a hundred years old, pour le Progrès de l'Homme have reached such a position in a rapidly expanding market ? What France Télécom FVA Management was the way out of this situation ? Alstom’s difficulties were the Roger Godino result of a combination of four factors : a technical problem, an Groupe ESSEC HRA Pharma inadequate operational performance, an impossible financial IDRH 1 situation, and the temporary collapse of its most important market. IdVectoR La Poste A rescue operation was hampered because these four factors had to Lafarge be handled simultaneously and the various bodies involved, Ministère de l’Industrie, direction générale des Entreprises including banks, shareholders, clients and employees had to be Paris-Ile de France Capitale Economique convinced that there was a future for Alstom, in spite of feelings of PSA Peugeot Citroën Reims Management School pessimism and general distrust. Acting as a catalyst, the French Renault state took on the challenge of making a successful last-ditch Saint-Gobain Schneider Electric Industrie attempt to turn the company around.
    [Show full text]
  • ALSTOM at a GLANCE 2020 at Alstom, We Partner with Our Stakeholders to Optimise Transport Networks by Understanding What Moves People
    ALSTOM AT A GLANCE 2020 At Alstom, we partner with our stakeholders to optimise transport networks by understanding what moves people. We are proud to work together to reinvent mobility and make transport easier and more intuitive. Leading the way to sustainable and smart mobility – naturally Henri Poupart-Lafarge Alstom Chairman and CEO “The role of Alstom is not only to provide rolling stock, services and maintenance but to offer mobility solutions to a world in profound transformation. Alstom is in an excellent position to shape tomorrow’s mobility: efficient, sustainable and connected.” URBAN ROLLING STOCK CUSTOMISED MAINLINE ROLLING SERVICES STOCK A COMPLETE INTEGRATED URBAN SYSTEMS RANGE OF MOBILITY LOCOMOTIVES SOLUTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENTS SIGNALLING 03 Leading the way to greener and smarter mobility, worldwide We believe that mobility must be sustainable. Alstom’s teams view these challenges as an opportunity, and a duty, to help society move forward. We innovate to design transport systems that are the sustainable and durable backbone of a multimodal transport future. TAKE PART IN Submission deadline: THE INNOVATION 31 July 2020 AWARDS 2020 OUR STRATEGY SHARE YOUR CREATIVITY GROWTH INNOVATION EFFICIENCY by offering in smarter and powered by Alstom greater value greener mobility digital AiM in Motion to our customers solutions Driven by the One Alstom team, Agile, Inclusive and Responsible I NOVE YOU Inaugurated in 2008, this internal annual GREEN & SMART INNOVATION competition aims to reinforce Road electromobility the innovation culture and strategy in Alstom Group. Eco-design Green and traction GREEN MOBILITY manufacturing Multimodality SMART and Flow MOBILITY Autonomous management trains Data driven rail mobility 04 A localised organisation, a touch point wherever you are We are global and local, working with stakeholders at every level to support the development of the world’s most advanced transport networks and local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • COVER SHEET May 2010
    COVER SHEET May 2010 LEAD AGENCY COOPERATING AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) TITLE LOCATION Kemper County Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Kemper County, Mississippi (IGCC) Project, Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0409) CONTACTS Additional copies or information concerning this Draft EIS can be obtained from Mr. Richard A. Hargis, Jr., National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Document Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15236-0940. Telephone: 412-386-6065. E-mail: Kemper- [email protected]. For general information on DOE’s NEPA process, contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-54), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, Southwest, Washington, DC, 20585-0001. Telephone: 202-586-4600, or leave a toll-free message at 1-800-472-2756. ABSTRACT This Final EIS assesses the potential environmental impacts that would result from a proposed DOE action to provide cost-shared funding and possibly a loan guarantee for construction and operation of advanced power generation plant in Kemper County, Mississippi. The project was selected under DOE’s Clean Coal Power Initiative to demonstrate IGCC technology. DOE also invited Mississippi Power Company to submit an application for the Kemper County IGCC Project to the Loan Guarantee Program during 2008. Assessment of a prospective loan guarantee is currently in progress. The power genera- tion components (i.e., coal gasifiers, synthesis gas [syngas] cleanup systems, combined-cycle unit, and supporting infrastructure) would convert coal into syngas to drive gas combustion turbines, and hot exhaust gas from the gas turbines would generate steam from water to drive a steam turbine.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitment in Action
    Commitment in action Plazza 2020-2021 Book Together, let's transform the Group Committed men, women and communities Plazza is at the heart of our commitment, and the communities selected for this issue are the perfect illustration of this. Each of them is working toward at least one of the aspects of the Engage 2025 strategy presented below. You can identify them by using the Group's colour codes. Gervais Pellissier Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Reinvent our profession as an operator People & Transformation Accelerate in high-growth regions I am writing to you in this new issue of The communities presented in this the Plazza Book amid unprecedented issue are relevant in more ways than disruptions. The health crisis has pushed one. Whether it be about networks, Place Data and AI at the heart of our innovation model us to accelerate our adaptations to the the sustainability of our customer new ways of working with a focus on relationships, our roots in growing regions Build the business of tomorrow together maintaining the Group's activities. It has or the development of our employees' been a catalyst for the new practices that skills, they reflect the four ambitions of each of you has had a chance to test out the Engage 2025 strategic plan and its Sustainably commit to inclusion and the planet in your everyday lives. sustainable commitment to society. Plazza has been in the heart of these The already-porous boundaries between changes, acting as a beacon, as a meeting the professional and personal spheres point, to support your many initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • COPELAND COOK TAYLOR & BUSH Gg
    COPELAND COOK TAYLOR & JOHN H. GEARY, JR. 601.427.1461 BUSH [email protected] July 24, 2015 Katherine Collier Executive Secretary/MSPSC gg Woolfolk State Office Building \08 501 North West Street, Suite 201A g\ O Jackson, Mississippi 39201 RE: Notice of Intent of Mississippi Power Company for a Change in Rates Supported by a Conventional Rate Filing or, in the Alternative, by a Rate Mitigation Plan in Connection with the Kemper County IGCC Project Docket No. 2015-UN-80 Dear Ms. Collier: Greenleaf CO2 Solutions, LLC filed today, electronically, a Motion to Dismiss in the above styled Docket. Enclosed please find the original and twelve (12) copies of this Motion. A copy of the first page of the Response is also enclosed. I would appreciate your file-stamping this page and returning it to me in the stamped, addressed envelope. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, H. Geary, Jr. Mr. Virden Jones Shawn Shurden, Esq. Chad Reynolds, Esq. All parties of record JACKSON i RIDGELAND 600 Concourse, Suite 100 1076 Highland Colony Parkway Ridgeland, Mississippi 39157 P.O. Box 6o2o Ridgeland, MS 39158 Tel (601) 856-7200 Fax (601) 8s6-7626 GULF COAST i HATTIESBURG www.copelandcook.com * Electronic Copy * MS Public Service Commission * 7/31/2015 * MS Public Service Commission * Electronic Copy* FILED JUL 2 4 2015 SERVICE BEFORE THE MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIOMISS.PUBUC COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. 2015-UN-80 EC-120-0097-00 IN RE: NOTICE OF INTENT OF MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY FOR A CHANGE IN RATES SUPPORTED BY A CONVENTIONAL RATE FILING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, BY A RATE MITIGATION PLAN IN CONNECTION WITH THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT MOTION TO DISMISS Pursuant to RP 6.121 of the Public Utilities Rules of Practice and Procedure ("Rules") of the Mississippi Public Service Commission ("Commission"), Greenleaf CO2 Solutions, LLC ("Greenleaf"), moves to dismiss the above-numbered Docket.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Document 2016/17
    * TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2016/17 DESCRIPTION CORPORATE 1 OF GROUP ACTIVITIES AFR 3 5 GOVERNANCE 137 Industry characteristics 4 Chairman’s report 138 Competitive position 7 Executive Committee AFR 181 Strategy 8 Statutory Auditors’ report prepared Offering 9 in accordance with Article L. 225‑235 of the French Commercial Code Research and development 15 on the report prepared by the Chairman of the Board of Alstom AFR 182 MANAGEMENT REPORT Interests of the officers 2 ON CONSOLIDATED and employees in the share capital 183 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Related‑party agreements and commitments 190 AFR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 AFR 19 Statutory Auditors 190 Main events of fiscal year 2016/17 20 Objectives for 2020 confirmed 21 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Commercial performance 22 6 ALSTOM’S SOCIAL Orders backlog 24 RESPONSIBILITY 191 Income Statement 24 Sustainable development strategy 192 Free cash flow 26 Designing sustainable mobility solutions 200 Net Debt 27 Environmental performance 207 Equity 27 Social performance 215 Non‑GAAP financial indicators definitions 28 Relationships with external stakeholders 233 Synthesis of indicators/key figures 2016/17 244 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AFR 31 Report by one of the Statutory Auditors, 3 Consolidated income statement 32 appointed as an independent third party , on the consolidated environmental, Statutory financial statements 98 labour and social information presented in the management report 247 AFR RISK FACTORS 119 Table of compulsory CSR information AFR 250 4 Risks in relation to the economic environment
    [Show full text]
  • Kemper IGCC Project November, 2017
    IM Monthly Report Mississippi Public Service Commission Kemper IGCC Project November, 2017 URS Corporation 600 Carondelet Street New Orleans, LA 70130-3587 Tel: 504.586.8111 Fax: 504.522.0554 www.urscorp.com Confidential IM November 2017 Report Mississippi Public Service Commission Kemper IGCC Project Executive Summary URS Corporation (URS), later acquired by AECOM, was requested by the Mississippi Public Service Commission (MPSC) to provide Independent Monitoring services for the Kemper Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Project located in Kemper County, MS. The scope of services includes monthly reporting by URS (AECOM) and its subcontractors, the Independent Monitor (IM), of the status and prudency of the on-going engineering, procurement, construction and startup activities performed by Mississippi Power Company (MPC or the Company), its parent Southern Company and subsidiary Southern Company Services (SCS), and its subcontractors on the project. This IM Monthly Report provides the results of this assessment for the reporting period of November, 2017, and review of the project status reported by MPC for the period of September and October, 2017 (September 2017 accounting records and October 2017 PSC Report). During this reporting period, the IM has conducted weekly status review meetings with MPSC staff. Other meetings and reviews were also conducted, as described below (refer to other Report Sections where referenced for more details): November, 2017 – Accounting audit of financial records from end of August, 2017 through end of September, 2017 held at MPC offices in Gulfport, MS (Appendix C). November, 2017 – Daily monitoring of on-going site activities at the jobsite (Appendix E). Project Status through November, 2017 (Unless Noted Otherwise) Engineering - The gasification island design performed by KBR, and the SCS design of the combined cycle island and the balance of plant (BOP) work, is 100% complete for base scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Paris, 28th October 2020 ARGOS INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP : SNCF RÉSEAU SELECTS THE THALES, ALSTOM AND HITACHI RAIL GROUPS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ITS NEXT GENERATION SIGNAL INTERLOCKINGS The ARGOS innovation partnership launched by SNCF Réseau in 2018 to develop and rollout a new generation of computer-controlled signal interlockings is about to graduate to the next stage. For 18 months, teams of industrial and SNCF Réseau engineers have been conducting research to find the technical solution best suited to SNCF Réseau’s needs and targets. For the development phase now about to begin, SNCF Réseau will be pursuing its cooperation with the Thales, Alstom and Hitachi Rail groups. The ARGOS innovation partnership challenge Computer-controlled interlockings are crucial to ensuring the safety of moving trains by controlling point and signal operations in their catchment area. Many existing interlocking boxes are old or their technologies obsolete and are therefore due for replacement. The ARGOS computer-controlled interlockings under development will enable these electro-mechanical, electrical or purely mechanical systems to be converted and upgraded to digital technology. The ARGOS project targets high levels of technical and economic performance. By transmitting information in real time, incident response will be swifter, reducing the impact of failures and maintenance and improving traffic flows, with the attendant knock-on benefits for passengers. The solutions developed will obviate the need for intermediate relays, the resulting smaller footprint reducing the volume of ground-based infrastructure and cables and driving down installation and maintenance costs. The benefits ultimately expected are as follows : a 15% decrease in installation and maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cybersecurity: the “Must-Have” for Smart Systems
    CYBERSECURITY: For Safe and Secure Mobility Editorial Cybersecurity: the “must-have” for smart systems Eddy Thesee Vice President, Cybersecurity Products & Solutions,Alstom In many respects, a computer system bears a remarkable likeness to living organisms. Like them, it grows, develops, and explores new territory. Above all, it seamlessly interlocks with its surrounding ecosystem, which for its part is constantly changing, and it sees new species regularly appear. There is a lot more to a railway system than its computer system. Computer systems, however, are acquiring more and more importance within the networks, in the control centres or the drivers’ cabins, as well as track equipment and traveller information systems. This increasingly prominent role offers a fantastic opportunity for creating value, as digitisation brings added intelligence to railway networks, in terms both of their development and operational needs and of their maintenance requirements. This added element of intelligent systems is nevertheless accompanied by an added element of fragility, if the overall security of the digital systems used is not taken seriously, and adequately matched by the safety and security culture that is typical of the railway world. Because computer systems are “living” systems, this demands of those playing their various roles in the railway universe permanent vigilance, combined with a solid ability to anticipate and adapt. The leading players in the transport world have, during the last few years, entered the era of cybersecurity. In the railway world, attacks are still rare. As the networks modernise, however, exposure increases apace. The challenge is thus clear: cybersecurity must be placed at the very heart of our culture of excellence and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Testimony of Bruce C. Harrington on Behalf of Mississippi Power Company Page 1 of 15
    1 DIRECT TESTIMONY 2 OF 3 BRUCE C. HARRINGTON 4 On Behalf of 5 MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY 6 BEFORE THE MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 7 DOCKET NO. 2016-AD-0161 8 9 Q. Would you please state your name, position and business address? 10 A. My name is Bruce C. Harrington. I am the Plant Manager, Kemper County 1 11 Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Plant (Kemper Plant or the Plant ) 12 for Mississippi Power Company (MPC or the Company). My business address is 13 5935 Highway 493 P.O. 369, DeKalb, MS. 14 Q. Please describe your education and professional experience. 15 A. I received my Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and my Masters 16 of Business Administration from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville in 1989 and 17 1991, respectively. I obtained my Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from 18 Carnegie Mellon University in 1996. I have been an employee of Southern Company 19 Services, Inc. (SCS) and MPC for a cumulative fifteen years and have served in a 20 variety of positions of increasing responsibilities in the areas of plant engineering, 1 The Kemper Project Plant is a lignite-fueled solid-fuel base load electric generating plant, comprised of a two- on-one integrated gasification combined cycle with a net summer capacity of 582 megawatts (Plant) and the environmental equipment for the reduction of various emissions from the facility, including but not limited to, equipment and facilities for the capture of approximately 65% of the carbon dioxide emissions from the Plant. Direct Testimony of Bruce C.
    [Show full text]