DOCSLIB.ORG

Legal Strategies for Protecting Human Rights in North Korea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legal Strategies for Protecting Human Rights in North Korea 1 2 Legal Strategies for Protecting Human Rights in North Korea by Paolo Cammarota, Joe Crace, Kim Worly, and Haim Zaltzman (attorneys at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This handbook describes the options available to human rights NGOs seeking to pursue international legal action against North Korea. North Korea presents an extreme version of the challenge that often faces non-governmental organizations. It has a daunting record of human rights abuses and atrocities. However, at the same time, North Korea is an isolated hermit state, extremely resistant to outside pressure. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) tracking human rights abuses around the world are frustrated by the difficulty of doing something about those abuses. However, the international legal system offers a variety of avenues for action which NGOs can pursue. Pursuing these avenues helps link NGOs to the larger framework of international legal institutions. This report explores these legal avenues. It does so by considering what specific options are available in the case of North Korea, exploring how those options would be pursued, and analyzing the practical advantages and difficulties of each one. The options presented are: Referral to the International Criminal Court Referral to the U.N. Security Council Working with the U.N. Human Rights Council Taking action under an international covenant to which North Korea is a party: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women the Convention on the Rights of the Child the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights Pursuing a lawsuit under the Alien Tort Claims Act or similar U.S. law This is by no means an exhaustive list. For example, other nations have their own domestic analogs to the U.S. Alien Tort Claims Act, and different states are parties to different international treaties and conventions. However, this report illustrates the kinds of considerations necessary when evaluating the options available under international treaties or when suing the officials of one country in the courts of another. For the first four of these options, the report explores: General description of the option The legal standards for action to be taken The violations that North Korea has committed of those standards The institutional process involved in that option Possible outcomes from the option Political considerations In addition, in the discussion of the Alien Tort Claims Act, the report examines the process of filing a lawsuit for claims of abuse in another country, and explores the advantages and disadvantages of such an action. The goal of this handbook is to assist NGOs concerned about the human rights situation in North Korea, and also to provide a general resource for NGOs concerned about human rights around the world. Hopefully, NGOs focused on North Korea will be assisted by this report and its consideration of practical ways that NGOs can work with the international legal system. In addition, other NGOs can adapt this report to their own needs. By presenting practical information about international legal options, this report hopes to provide NGOs with the tools to pursue such options themselves. Further, by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each option, this report attempts to illustrate how NGOs may conduct their own analysis of which legal options are most helpful in their own situations, and thus help NGOs address the challenge of states, like North Korea, that are not responsive to NGO criticism of abuses of human rights. 4 INTRODUCTION For over sixty years, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has engaged in the systematic, flagrant abuse of nearly every human right recognized by international law. Citizens found guilty of “crimes” against the regime often face imprisonment where they are subjected to torture, below subsistence level food rations, forced labor, and sometimes execution. Despite widespread condemnation of these violations by individuals, states, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), North Korea’s isolation has made it difficult for external forces to have much impact. It is therefore a challenge for NGOs concerned about conditions in North Korea to take productive action. The extreme situation in North Korea is emblematic of a general problem facing NGOs concerned about human rights. In the face of human rights violations and atrocities around the world, NGOs are a vital safeguard for the oppressed and downtrodden. NGOs, however, have little formal power themselves, and can face challenges in ameliorating the abuses they seek to uncover and document. The modern system of international law, however, provides myriad avenues for NGOs to pursue against serial human rights abusers and rogue states. This report analyzes this diverse group of options, their respective advantages and disadvantages in the case of North Korea, and presents a brief assessment of their feasibility and effectiveness in today’s political climate. The case of North Korea is used to illustrate methods NGOs in general can follow to defend human rights in other countries. The usefulness of each method will, naturally, depend on the specific facts that apply, and NGOs must exercise their own judgment as to which methods are most likely to be effective. By pursuing these international legal avenues, NGOs can link with the broader international legal system to fight against abuses, overcoming the problem of NGO lack of resources. After briefly identifying relevant facts regarding North Korean history, politics, and human rights abuses, this report discusses the avenues available to NGOs through international organizations and U.N. bodies, action under human rights treaties, and the possibility of applying domestic law to foreign human rights violations. The report examines the following international legal options: (i) possible referral of North Korea to the International Criminal Court; (ii) referral of the situation in North Korea to the U.N. Security Council;1 (iii) working with the Human Rights Council; (iii) action under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; (iv) action under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; (v) action under the Convention on the Rights of the Child; (vi) action under the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights; and (vii) pursuing a lawsuit under the Alien Tort Claims Act or similar U.S. law. Ultimately, this report describes the most promising course to pursue for each of these possible legal options: 1 See DLA PIPER US LLP & U.S. COMM. FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN NORTH KOREA, FAILURE TO PROTECT: A CALL FOR THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL TO ACT IN NORTH KOREA (2006), available at http://www.dlapiper.com/files/upload/North%20Korea%20Report.pdf (last visited Oct. 18, 2007), and available at http://www.hrnk.org/failureToProtect-Report.pdf (last visited Oct. 18, 2007) [hereinafter FAILURE TO PROTECT]. The report explores the possibility of U.N. Security Council action in North Korea in detail. 5 • International Criminal Court: an NGO could encourage member states or the U.N. Security Council to refer North Korea for prosecution. • U.N. Security Council: an NGO could lobby member states to bring a resolution calling for action to be taken regarding human rights in North Korea. • U.N. Human Rights Council: NGOs can push the Council to continue the focus on North Korean human rights begun by its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights. • U.N. Treaty Bodies: for the four treaty bodies of which North Korea is a member, NGOs can file shadow reports on human rights in North Korea, and provide treaty bodies with independent sources of information. • Alien Tort Claims Act: an NGO could help support a lawsuit under this act by a North Korean victim of abuses, allowing the NGO to use American law to enforce human rights standards. Two of these methods have already been used by NGOs in the case of North Korea. First, the Commission on Human Rights (the predecessor to the Human Rights Council) has issued three resolutions on human rights in North Korea and has appointed a Special Rapporteur to address the situation. Second, of the four U.N. treaty bodies of which North Korea is a member, three have noted the existence of North Korean human rights concerns: the bodies associated with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. These successes demonstrate the possibilities for NGOs to work with the existing international legal system, and point to the need to continue this work. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.........................................................................................................3 Introduction......................................................................................................................5 Table of Contents............................................................................................................7 I. The Factual Case Against North Korea ........................................................................9 II. International Criminal Court.......................................................................................25 III. U.N. Security Council Action.....................................................................................39 IV. Human
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse Bruce W. Bennett C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse Bruce W.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Evangelistic Strategies for North Korean Defectors (Talbukmin) in South Korea
    ABSTRACT Effective Evangelistic Strategies for North Korean Defectors (Talbukmin) in South Korea South Korean churches eagerness for spreading the gospel to North Koreans is a passion. However, because of the barriers between the two Koreas, spreading the Good News is nearly impossible. In the middle of the 1990’s, numerous North Koreans defected to China to avoid starvation. Many South Korean missionaries met North Koreans directly and offered the gospel along with necessities for survival in China. Since the early of 2000’s, many Talbukmin have entered South Korea so South Korean churches have directly met North Koreans and spread the gospel. However, the fruits of evangelism are few. South Korean churches find that Talbukmin are very different from South Koreans in large part due to the sixty-year division. South Korean churches do not know or fully understand the characteristics of the Talbukmin. The evangelism strategies and ministry programs of South Korean churches, which are designed for South Koreans, do not adapt well to serve the Talbukmin. This research lists and describes the following five theories to be used in the development of the effective evangelistic strategies for use with the Talbukmin and for use to interpret the interviews and questionnaires: the conversion theory, the contextualization theory, the homogenous principle, the worldview transformation theory, and the Nevius Mission Plan. In the following research exploration of the evangelization of Talbukmin in South Korea occurs through two major research agendas. The first agenda is concerned with the study of the characteristics of Talbukmin to be used for the evangelists’ understanding of the depth of differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of AFSC Archives on Korea (1938-2000) Created by Elizabeth Douglas ’13 in Spring 2012
    Survey of AFSC Archives on Korea (1938-2000) Created by Elizabeth Douglas ’13 in Spring 2012 The AFSC in Korea: A Brief Summary The American Friends Service Committee’s (AFSC) archival on Korea first begin in 1938 when Gilbert Bowles travelled to Japanese occupied Korea. The AFSC did not begin work in the country until 1946, when it began to provide aid to the devastated country. Through the rest of the 1940s and 1950s, the AFSC provided relief to victims of both World War II and the Korean War. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the AFSC worked to expose the human rights violations perpetrated by the South Korean government. From since the 1960s, the AFSC organized various conferences and seminars on the possibility of reunifying North and South Korea. Throughout this time, AFSC delegates visited the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; each time they toured the country, they wrote detailed reports describing their experiences and observations. The AFSC’s work continues into the 21st Century, and the archives are updated to reflect the AFSC’s current projects. How to Use this Survey: The following survey was designed to give a brief overview of the AFSC’s collection of materials on Korea. I have first listed the contents of the AFSC reference files on Korea and then the individual boxes chronologically. Within in each year is a list of relevant boxes and their pertinent contents. As the AFSC’s archives on Korea span a considerable period, there is much variance in organization systems. Although I did not list the names of every folder in every box, I gave a brief summary of relevant materials in each box; these summaries are not comprehensive but merely give an overview of the material.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020
    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You, Father Kim Il Sung” Is the First Phrase North Korean Parents Are Instructed to Teach to Their Children
    “THANK YOU FATHER KIM ILLL SUNG”:”:”: Eyewitness Accounts of Severe Violations of Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion in North Korea PPPREPARED BYYY: DAVID HAWK Cover Photo by CNN NOVEMBER 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Michael Cromartie Chair Felice D. Gaer Vice Chair Nina Shea Vice Chair Preeta D. Bansal Archbishop Charles J. Chaput Khaled Abou El Fadl Dr. Richard D. Land Dr. Elizabeth H. Prodromou Bishop Ricardo Ramirez Ambassador John V. Hanford, III, ex officio Joseph R. Crapa Executive Diretor NORTH KOREA STUDY TEAM David Hawk Author and Lead Researcher Jae Chun Won Research Manager Byoung Lo (Philo) Kim Research Advisor United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Staff Tad Stahnke, Deputy Director for Policy David Dettoni, Deputy Director for Outreach Anne Johnson, Director of Communications Christy Klaasen, Director of Government Affairs Carmelita Hines, Director of Administration Patricia Carley, Associate Director for Policy Mark Hetfield, Director, International Refugee Issues Eileen Sullivan, Deputy Director for Communications Dwight Bashir, Senior Policy Analyst Robert C. Blitt, Legal Policy Analyst Catherine Cosman, Senior Policy Analyst Deborah DuCre, Receptionist Scott Flipse, Senior Policy Analyst Mindy Larmore, Policy Analyst Jacquelin Mitchell, Executive Assistant Tina Ramirez, Research Assistant Allison Salyer, Government Affairs Assistant Stephen R. Snow, Senior Policy Analyst Acknowledgements The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom expresses its deep gratitude to the former North Koreans now residing in South Korea who took the time to relay to the Commission their perspectives on the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and their experiences in North Korea prior to fleeing to China.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of Freedom of Religion Or Belief in North Korea
    Total denial: violations of freedom of religion or belief in North Korea September 2016 FOR PUBLIC USE Be a voice for the voiceless www.csw.org.uk Contents Executive summary 3 Recommendations 4 Christian Solidarity Worldwide and North Korea 5 Methodology 5 Freedom of religion or belief in theory 6 International law vs North Korean law on freedom of religion or belief 6 Ideological foundation vs concept of religious freedom 7 Freedom of religion or belief in practice 8 Persecution of Christians 9 Political prison camps (kwanliso) 10 Discrimination against Buddhism and Shamanism 11 Detention in China 12 Repatriation from China 13 Engagement with international faith groups and organisations 14 Conclusion 15 ‘There is almost complete denial of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as well as the right to freedom of opinion, expression, information and association’ UN Commission of Inquiry report on North Korea, 2014 Cover image: Statue in North Korea Photo: CSW extermination, enslavement/forced labour, forcible Executive summary transfer of population, arbitrary imprisonment, torture, persecution, enforced disappearance, rape and sexual The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), violence, and other inhumane acts. Documented incidents also known as North Korea, remains a uniquely isolated against Christians include being hung on a cross over a and repressed state in an increasingly interconnected fire, crushed under a steamroller, herded off bridges, global community. The isolation is maintained by and trampled underfoot. A policy of guilt by association multi-faceted aspects of the security and political applies, meaning that the relatives of Christians are also situation, and confines the people of North Korea to a detained regardless of whether they share the Christian monolithic system of control by the dynastic Kim family.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea's Political System*
    This article was translated by JIIA from Japanese into English as part of a research project to promote academic studies on the international circumstances in the Asia-Pacific. JIIA takes full responsibility for the translation of this article. To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your personal use and research, please contact JIIA by e-mail ([email protected]) Citation: International Circumstances in the Asia-Pacific Series, Japan Digital Library (March 2016), http://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/digital_library/korean_peninsula.php Series: Korean Peninsula Affairs North Korea’s Political System* Takashi Sakai** Introduction A year has passed since the birth of the Kim Jong-un regime in North Korea following the sudden death of General Secretary Kim Jong-il in December 2011. During the early days of the regime, many observers commented that all would not be smooth sailing for the new regime, citing the lack of power and previ- ous experience of the youthful Kim Jong-un as a primary cause of concern. However, on the surface at least, it now appears that Kim Jong-un is now in full control of his powers as the “Guiding Leader” and that the political situation is calm. The crucial issue is whether the present situation is stable and sustain- able. To consider this issue properly, it is important to understand the following series of questions. What is the current political structure in North Korea? Is the political structure the same as that which existed under the Kim Jong-il regime, or have significant changes occurred? What political dynamics are at play within this structure? Answering these questions with any degree of accuracy is not an easy task.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Illusive Utopia: Theater, Film, and Everyday Performance in North Korea Suk-Young Kim http://press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=370207 The University of Michigan Press, 2010 Introduction The central square in Pyongyang (Pyeongyang) buzzes with patriotic com- motion as millions of legs are lifted in one unanimous step. The procession of soldiers, workers, farmers, students, and ordinary citizens, all in immac- ulately organized regiments, turns around the gloomy corners of the gar- gantuan Stalinist buildings and heads straight toward the sacred center of today’s jubilee. Each regiment moves in unison while exuding un›inching zeal for the regime: young students, future soldiers, ›aunt slogans like “Let us meet at the war front” and “We will become bullets ourselves”; farmers march around the gigantic moving platform displaying the models of the bountiful harvest for the year; veterans’ family members demonstrate with slogans professing their profound love for the leader, such as “We cannot live without you” and “We worship the Dear General like the sky.” The marchers look weary and lean, wearing their best clothes, well adorned for the pompous occasion. Their facial expressions are intense, but their hollow gazes directed at the state leaders on a high podium betray the intensity. As the marchers pass by the sacrosanct leader Kim Jong-il (Gim Jeong-il), they wave their arms more frantically and proclaim even louder than before: “LONG LIVE THE DEAR GENERAL! LONG LIVE THE DEAR GENERAL!” Like the voice of a specter, the echo resonates over the gray city long after the marchers disappear from sight.1 It is 2003 and North Korea is commemorating the ‹fty-‹fth anniversary of the foundation of its state.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Through the Darkness
    LIGHT THROUGH THE DARKNESS IMPROVING THE HUMAN CONDITION IN NORTH KOREA. DEFINING A NEW PATH FORWARD. A CALL TO ACTION PAPER - JANUARY 2015 Victor Cha, Fellow in Human Freedom GEORGE W. BUSH INSTITUTE Housed within the George W. Bush Presidential Center, the George W. Bush Institute is an action-oriented, non- partisan policy organization with the mission of engaging communities in the United States and around the world by cultivating leaders and advancing policies to solve today’s most pressing challenges. It raises current and thought- provoking issues and builds programs to address these issues. The work of the Bush Institute is inspired by the principles that guided the Bushes in public life: that to whom much is given, much is required; belief in American ideals and leading with conviction; in service to Nation and leadership globally; in open societies ordered by liberty, and moral conviction; in private markets, humanized by compassionate government; and in communities structured to protect the weak and respect the rights of all. HUMAN FREEDOM INITIATIVE The Bush Institute’s Human Freedom initiative seeks to advance the development of free societies rooted in individual liberty, civil society, and democratic institutions and practices. Our programs provide a continuum of support for freedom advocates leading nonviolent change in countries that are closed, in transition to democracy, or in retreat from democracy. We advocate for U.S. global leadership and engagement as essential to increasing freedom in the world. VICTOR CHA, Fellow in Human Freedom, George W. Bush Institute As a Fellow in Human Freedom, Victor Cha is helping lead an initiative on the problem of human rights in North Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Humanity in North Korean Political Prisons
    Report: Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity in North Korean Political Prisons A report by the War Crimes Committee of the International Bar Association (IBA) International Bar Association 4th Floor, 10 St Bride Street London EC4A 4AD T: +44 (0)20 7842 0090 F: +44 (2)20 7842 0091 [email protected] www.ibanet.org © International Bar Association and Hogan Lovells December 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Application for permission should be made to the Content Department at the IBA address or Robert Snoddy at Hogan Lovells. Selling without prior written consent prohibited. The views expressed in this publication are those of the contributors, and not necessarily those of the International Bar Association or Hogan Lovells. IBA WAR CRIMES COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS Federica D’Alessandra Harvard University Gregory W Kehoe Greenberg Traurig IBA WAR CRIMES COMMITTEE IMMEDIATE PAST CO-CHAIR Steven Kay QC 9 Bedford Row The IBA would like to give special thanks to Hogan Lovells for co-authoring this report. The IBA would also like to thank the following organizations for their support: Acknowledgments The War Crimes Committee of the International Bar Association (“IBA”) is grateful to the IBA and its Executive Director, Dr. Mark Ellis, for their support and leadership in advancing this first of its kind, civil society-led Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity in North Korean Political Prisons (the “Inquiry”). The War Crimes Committee wishes to recognize the following Inquiry organizers within the Committee for their tireless efforts, creativity and enormous commitment of time to this undertaking: Steven Kay, Q.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Papers General Information
    January 2006 Published by the American Academy of Religion Vol. 21, No. 1 2006 2006 r embe M ar alend CALL FOR C e 2 e pag Se PAPERS Annual Meeting Call for Papers General Information ........................................................................3 Deadlines ........................................................................................3 Religious Studies News is the newspaper of record Guidelines for Submitting Proposals ..................................................3 for the field especially designed to serve the pro- fessional needs of persons involved in teaching Methods of Submission ....................................................................4 and scholarship in religion (broadly construed to include religious studies, theology, and sacred Sections ..........................................................................................5 texts). Published quarterly by the American Academy of Religion, RSN is received by some Groups............................................................................................7 10,000 scholars and by libraries at colleges and universities across North America and abroad. Participant Forms ........................................................................8, 9 Religious Studies News communicates the impor- tant events of the field and related areas. It pro- Seminars ......................................................................................16 vides a forum for members and others to examine critical issues in education, pedagogy (especially
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Nation: the Success and Crisis of Korean Civil Religion
    religions Article Building the Nation: The Success and Crisis of Korean Civil Religion Andrew Eungi Kim 1 and Daniel Connolly 2,* 1 Division of International Studies, Korea University, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea; [email protected] 2 Division of International Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Civil religion refers to a country’s beliefs, symbols, and rituals that bolster national unity and strengthen its citizens’ sense of identity and belonging. However, the literature on civil religion is divided between those who attribute it to bottom-up cultural spontaneity and those who see it as an ideological top-down construction. Moreover, there has been a relative lack of scholarly attention to Korean civil religion. This paper addresses both issues by arguing that a strong civil religion indeed exists in the country and that it has been an important part of the “nation-building” process since the founding of the Republic of Korea in 1948. The paper highlights how a succession of authoritarian regimes (1948–1987) successfully mobilized a strong civil religion for political purposes. The resulting civil religion targeted economic growth as the national goal to overcome all social ills, focused on the country’s ethnic and cultural homogeneity to boost national confidence and pride, exalted its traditional religions, especially Confucianism, as repositories of Korean traditional culture, and rendered sacred meanings to national symbols such as the flag and national anthem. Even after democratization, Korean civil religion remains largely ideological, as the Korean government is heavily involved in framing, planning, sponsoring, and promoting the country’s civil religion.
    [Show full text]