DOCSLIB.ORG

Path to Peace: the Case for a Peace Agreement to End the Korean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Path to Peace: the Case for a Peace Agreement to End the Korean Path Theto Case Peace for a Peace Agreement to End the Korean War Korea Peace Now! Women Mobilizing to End the War | February 2021 Path to Peace: The Case for a Peace Agreement to End the Korean War February 2021 Korea Peace Now! Women Mobilizing to End the War, a global campaign to end the Korean War, produced the present report to assess how a peace-first approach can resolve the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula. This report is a collective work that benefited from Korea Peace Now! would also like to thank Kevin Gray, months of consensus-building and input. Ph.D., Professor of International Relations at the University Korea Peace Now! would like to acknowledge of Sussex; Suzy Kim, Ph.D., Professor of Korean History in particular Henri Féron, Senior Fellow at the at Rutgers University; and Paul Liem, Korea Policy Center for International Policy, as project lead. Institute, who contributed their feedback and review. This report is the collective work of the following people: External contributions were made by Lt. Col. Daniel Davis, Senior Fellow and Military Expert at Defense Ray Acheson, Director of Reaching Critical Will, Women’s Priorities; Jessica Lee, Senior Research Fellow on East International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) Asia at Quincy Institute; Adam Mount, Senior Fellow and Christine Ahn, Executive Director, Women Director of the Defense Posture Project at the Federation Cross DMZ (Chapter V, “Why Women Should of American Scientists; and Hazel Smith, Professorial Be Involved in the Peace Process”) Research Associate at SOAS, University of London. Kozue Akibayashi, Professor at Doshisha University, These external contributions are strictly independent former International President of Women’s International from the Korea Peace Now! campaign and represent League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) (Chapter V, the personal views of the contributors. Their affiliations “Why Women Should Be Involved in the Peace Process”) are for identifying purposes only and do not represent the views of those institutions unless specified. Elizabeth Beavers, Advocacy Advisor, Women Cross DMZ (Chapter III, “The Implications of a Peace Agreement for Human Rights”) Edited by Kathleen Richards Maria Butler, Director of Global Programmes, Women’s Copyedited by Anne Louise Mahoney International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) Designed by Brian Breneman Youngmi Cho, Executive Director of Korean Women’s Movement for Peace (Chapter V, “Why Women Should Be Involved in the Peace Process”) Korea Peace Now! Women Mobilizing to End the War is a global coalition of women’s peace organizations – Korean Henri Féron, Senior Fellow, Center for International Policy Women’s Movement for Peace, Women’s International Catherine Killough, Advocacy and Leadership League for Peace and Freedom, and Women Cross Coordinator, Women Cross DMZ DMZ – calling for an end to the Korean War with a peace Gwyn Kirk, Ph.D. (Chapter V, “Why Women agreement and women’s inclusion in the peace processes. Should Be Involved in the Peace Process”) YouKyoung Ko, Consultant, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) Hyun Lee, US National Organizer, Women Cross DMZ Marie O’Reilly, Gender, Peace and Security Consultant (Chapter V, “Why Women Should Be Involved in the Peace Process”) Kathleen Richards, Communications Director, Women Cross DMZ 2 PATH TO PEACE: THE CASE FOR A PEACE AGREEMENT TO END THE KOREAN WAR Executive Summary Despite years of negotiations, the United States, North A peace agreement would reduce the risk of nuclear Korea, and South Korea remain locked in a dangerous war and facilitate talks on disarmament or arms control. standoff. This stalemate perpetuates the worsening secu- A peace agreement that ends the wartime status quo and rity crisis on the Korean Peninsula, which poses an exis- enables the normalization of US–North Korean relations tential threat to millions of people. may create the conditions for more effective engagement This crisis is a direct result of the unresolved Korean on denuclearization by curbing the security risks fueling War, which was halted only by a fragile armistice and is North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. A peace agree- the root cause of tensions and hostilities on the Korean ment would not legally imply recognition of North Korea Peninsula. The unresolved state of the Korean War fuels as a “nuclear weapons state.” increasing militarization and carries major political and The unresolved Korean War has had a negative human economic costs. rights impact on all parties. Governments have diverted Attempts to force North Korea’s unilateral denucle- resources toward militarism and away from people’s wel- arization through pressure have continuously failed. fare and have imposed restrictions on civil liberties in the To assess how a peace-first approach can help resolve name of security. Pressure has failed to improve human the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula, the Korea rights. While a peace agreement to resolve the Korean Peace Now! campaign has produced the present report War is not a panacea, it would improve people’s lives, sap to examine the political and legal ramifications of a the militarism that undergirds abuses, and create the con- peace agreement. The authors examine the implications ditions to engage more effectively on human rights. that a peace agreement would have on top US prior- A peace agreement would also improve the national ities, including the nuclear dispute, the human rights security of South Korea and the United States and create situation, and the US–South Korean alliance. Addi- space to recalibrate their relationship in ways that better tionally, the report highlights the legal and practical fit contemporary circumstances and interests. A peace reasons for including women in a peace process to end agreement would not legally imply the end of the alliance the Korean War. or a withdrawal of US troops, unless otherwise specified. It would imply dissolution of the Armistice and the “UN Key Findings Command.” Women have a particular stake in resolving the Korean The first step in resolving the armed standoff should be War due to the gendered impacts of war and militarism. to agree to forgo use of force in its resolution. This mutu- Despite a rich history of organizing through grassroots DRAFT ally beneficial ground rule would sap the tensions driving action on the Peninsula and internationally, only very few the main security risks, the uncontrolled militarization, have been invited to formal peacemaking initiatives. Sev- and the human costs of war. eral sources of international law, including the Women, A peace agreement including the United States and Peace, and Security framework, mandate women’s inclu- the two Koreas would bindingly end the state of war, sion. Research shows that such inclusion contributes to recognizing that wartime rights to use force have ended more durable peace. once and for all. Other commonly proposed instruments, The report recommends that the United States, South such as end-of-war declarations, nonaggression agree- Korea, and North Korea immediately conclude a fair and ments, or normalization agreements, do not necessarily binding peace agreement that acts as a final settlement of end a state of war. the war and serves as a foundation for a peace regime. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 4 PATH TO PEACE: THE CASE FOR A PEACE AGREEMENT TO END THE KOREAN WAR Table of Contents Introduction 7 I. Why the Armistice Should Be Replaced with a Peace Agreement 9 What Is a Peace Agreement? 11 Parties to a Peace Agreement 12 II.The Implications of a Peace Agreement for Denuclearization 15 Background: The Nuclear Dimension of the Korean War 15 Application: Peace as Nuclear De-escalation 18 III. The Implications of a Peace Agreement for Human Rights 21 IV. The Implications of a Peace Agreement for US–ROK Relations 25 V. Why Women Should Be Involved in the Peace Process 31 VI. Recommendations 37 Annex I: Ratification of a Peace Agreement 39 US Ratification 39 South Korean Ratification 40 North Korean Ratification 40 External Contributions 41 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 6 PATH TO PEACE: THE CASE FOR A PEACE AGREEMENT TO END THE KOREAN WAR Introduction Despite several meetings between the leaders of the United States and North Korea (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea/DPRK) in recent years, the two countries have failed to make meaningful progress in negotiations on peace and denuclearization. This stale- mate perpetuates the worsening security crisis on the Korean Peninsula, which has remained a vexing prob- lem for current and past US administrations and poses an existential threat to millions of people on the Korean Peninsula, in Northeast Asia and the United States, and around the world. For the last 30 years, the United States has tried to force North Korea to unilaterally denuclearize. While there have been some agreements, these eventually col- lapsed, and over time both sides increasingly hardened their position. The more the United States engaged in a coercive diplomacy leveraging military shows of force, economic sanctions, and diplomatic isolation, the more North Korea pursued economic self-reliance and nu- clear weapons development. Despite being one of the most isolated, pressured, and sanctioned countries in the world, North Korea now has more nuclear weap- ons than ever, and its intercontinental ballistic missiles may have the capability to strike anywhere on the US mainland.1 The United States and North Korea came dangerous- Declaration, in which they committed to establish “new In April 2018, ly close to military action in 2017,2 when US President U.S.-DPRK relations” based on “peace and prosperity.”6 South Korean Donald Trump threatened to “totally destroy North Those declarations also included a commitment to work President Moon Jae-in and North DRAFT 3 Korea” and Pyongyang responded that its “rocket” toward the “denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.” Korean leader 4 would inevitably “visit” the US mainland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Western Part of the Korean Demilitarized Zone
    land Article Long-Term Land Cover Changes in the Western Part of the Korean Demilitarized Zone Jae Hyun Kim 1,2,3 , Shinyeong Park 2, Seung Ho Kim 2 and Eun Ju Lee 3,* 1 Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] 2 DMZ Ecology Research Institute, Paju 10881, Korea; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (S.H.K.) 3 School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: After the Korean War, human access to the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) was highly restricted. However, limited agricultural activity was allowed in the Civilian Control Zone (CCZ) surrounding the DMZ. In this study, land cover and vegetation changes in the western DMZ and CCZ from 1919 to 2017 were investigated. Coniferous forests were nearly completely destroyed during the war and were then converted to deciduous forests by ecological succession. Plains in the DMZ and CCZ areas showed different patterns of land cover changes. In the DMZ, pre-war rice paddies were gradually transformed into grasslands. These grasslands have not returned to forest, and this may be explained by wildfires set for military purposes or hydrological fluctuations in floodplains. Grasslands near the floodplains in the DMZ are highly valued for conservation as a rare land type. Most grasslands in the CCZ were converted back to rice paddies, consistent with their previous use. After the 1990s, ginseng cultivation in the CCZ increased. In addition, the landscape changes in the Korean DMZ and CCZ were affected by political circumstances between South and North Citation: Kim, J.H.; Park, S.; Kim, Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • From Crisis to Opportunity for Sustainable Peace
    From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19 From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19 November 2020 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2020 First published 2020 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publishing (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace: A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19. International Labour Office, Interpeace, United Nations Peacebuilding Support Office and World Health Organization – Geneva: ILO, 2020 ISBN 9789220336809 (web PDF) Also available in French: De la crise à l’opportunité d’une paix durable.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of North Korea's Major Conventional Provocations Since
    May 25, 2010 Record of North Korea’s Major Conventional Provocations since 1960s Complied by the Office of the Korea Chair, CSIS Please note that the conventional provocations we listed herein only include major armed conflicts, military/espionage incursions, border infractions, acts of terrorism including sabotage bombings and political assassinations since the 1960s that resulted in casualties in order to analyze the significance of the attack on the Cheonan and loss of military personnel. This list excludes any North Korean verbal threats and instigation, kidnapping as well as the country’s missile launches and nuclear tests. January 21, 1968 Blue House Raid A North Korean armed guerrilla unit crossed the Demilitarized Zone into South Korea and, in disguise of South Korean military and civilians, attempted to infiltrate the Blue House to assassinate South Korean President Park Chung-hee. The assassination attempt was foiled, and in the process of pursuing commandos escaping back to North Korea, a significant number of South Korean police and soldiers were killed and wounded, allegedly as many as 68 and 66, respectively. Six American casualties were also reported. ROK Response: All 31 North Korean infiltrators were hunted down and killed except Kim Shin-Jo. After the raid, South Korea swiftly moved to strengthen the national defense by establishing the ROK Reserve Forces and defense industry and installing iron fencing along the military demarcation line. January 23, 1968 USS Pueblo Seizure The U.S. navy intelligence ship Pueblo on its mission near the coast of North Korea was captured in international waters by North Korea. Out of 83 crewmen, one died and 82 men were held prisoners for 11 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Mixed Signaling Strategies in International Crisis Negotiations
    USE OF MIXED SIGNALING STRATEGIES IN INTERNATIONAL CRISIS NEGOTIATIONS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Unislawa M. Wszolek, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Brian Pollins, Adviser Daniel Verdier Adviser Randall Schweller Graduate Program in Political Science ABSTRACT The assertion that clear signaling prevents unnecessary war drives much of the recent developments in research on international crises signaling, so much so that this work has aimed at identifying types of clear signals. But if clear signals are the only mechanism for preventing war, as the signaling literature claims, an important puzzle remains — why are signals that combine both carrot and stick components sent and why are signals that are partial or ambiguous sent. While these signals would seemingly work at cross-purposes undermining the signaler’s goals, actually, we observe them frequently in crises that not only end short of war but also that realize the signaler’s goals. Through a game theoretic model, this dissertation theorizes that because these alternatives to clear signals increase the attractiveness, and therefore the likelihood, of compliance they are a more cost-effective way to show resolve and avoid unnecessary conflict than clear signals. In addition to building a game theoretic model, an additional contribution of this thesis is to develop a method for observing mixed versus clear signaling strategies and use this method to test the linkage between signaling and crisis outcomes. Results of statistical analyses support theoretical expectations: clear signaling strategies might not always be the most effective way to secure peace, while mixed signaling strategies can be an effective deterrent.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Treaty Between the Republic of Finland and the Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic, Signed at Dorpat, October 14, 1920
    PEACE TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND AND THE RUSSIAN SOCIALIST FEDERAL SOVIET REPUBLIC, SIGNED AT DORPAT, OCTOBER 14, 1920 Whereas Finland declared its independence in 1917, and Russia has recognised the independence and the sovereignty of Finland within the frontiers of the Grand Duchy of Finland, The Government of the Republic of Finland, and the Government of the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia, Actuated by a desire to put an end to the war which has since arisen between their States, to establish mutual and lasting peace relations, and to confirm the situation which springs from the ancient political union of Finland and Russia, Have resolved to conclude a Treaty with this object in view, and have selected as their representatives for this purpose, the following: For the Government of the Republic of Finland: M. JUHO KUSTI PAASIKIVI, M. JUHO HEIKKI VENNOLA, M. ALEXANDER FREY, M. KARL RUDOLF WALDEN, M. VÄINÖ TANNER, M. VÄINÖ VOIONMAA, M. VÄINÖ GABRIEL KIVILINNA. For the Federal Socialist Republic of Soviet Russia: M. JEAN ANTONOVITCH BERZINE, M. PLATON MIKHAJLOVITCH KERGENTSEFF, M. NICOLAS SERGUEJEVITCH TIKHMENEFF. Who, after meeting at the town of Dorpat and exchanging their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed to the following provisions: Article 1. From the date upon which this Treaty shall come into force, a state of war shall cease to exist between the Contracting Powers, and the two Powers shall mutually undertake to maintain, for the future, an attitude of peace and goodwill towards one another. Article 2. The frontier between the States of Russia and of Finland shall be as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifist War
    arts Article From Horrors Past to Horrors Future: Pacifist War Art (1919–1939) Lauren Jannette Department of History, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; [email protected] Received: 22 April 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: In this paper, I argue that interwar pacifists working in France presented an evolving narrative of what the First World War represented in order to maintain support for their movement and a continued peace in Europe. Utilizing posters, photographs, pamphlets, and art instillations created by pacifist organizations, I interject in ongoing debates over the First World War as a moment of rupture in art and pacifism in France, arguing that the moment of rupture occurred a decade after the conflict had ended with the failure of the Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments of 1932–1934 and the election of Hitler as the leader of a remilitarized Germany. Pacifist art of the 1920s saw a return to traditional motifs and styles of art that remembered the horrors of the past war. This return to tradition aimed to inspire adherence to the new pacifist organizations in the hopes of creating a new peace-filled world. The era of optimism and tradition ended with the economic and political crisis of the early 1930s, forcing pacifists to reconceptualize the images and styles of art that they utilized. Instead of relying on depictions of the horrors of the past war, these images shifted the focus to the mass civilian casualties future wars would bring in a desperate struggle to prevent the outbreak of another world war.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020
    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Between Israel and the Palestinians Appears to Be As Elusive As Ever. Following the Most Recent Collapse of American-Broke
    38 REVIVING THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN PEACE PROCESS: HISTORICAL LES- SONS FOR THE MARCH 2015 ISRAELI ELECTIONS Elijah Jatovsky Lessons derived from the successes that led to the signing of the 1993 Declaration of Principles between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization highlight modern criteria by which a debilitated Israeli-Palestinian peace process can be revitalized. Writ- ten in the run-up to the March 2015 Israeli elections, this article examines a scenario for the emergence of a security-credentialed leadership of the Israeli Center-Left. Such leadership did not in fact emerge in this election cycle. However, should this occur in the future, this paper proposes a Plan A, whereby Israel submits a generous two-state deal to the Palestinians based roughly on that of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s offer in 2008. Should Palestinians find this offer unacceptable whether due to reservations on borders, Jerusalem or refugees, this paper proposes a Plan B by which Israel would conduct a staged, unilateral withdrawal from large areas of the West Bank to preserve the viability of a two-state solution. INTRODUCTION Peace between Israel and the Palestinians appears to be as elusive as ever. Following the most recent collapse of American-brokered negotiations in April 2014, Palestinians announced they would revert to pursuing statehood through the United Nations (UN), a move Israel vehemently opposes. A UN Security Council (UNSC) vote on some form of a proposal calling for an end to “Israeli occupation in the West Bank” by 2016 is expected later this month.1 In July 2014, a two-month war between Hamas-controlled Gaza and Israel broke out, claiming the lives of over 2,100 Gazans (this number encompassing both combatants and civilians), 66 Israeli soldiers and seven Israeli civilians—the low number of Israeli civilians credited to Israel’s sophisti- cated anti-missile Iron Dome system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmz Full Day Tour
    DMZ TOUR DMZ FULL DAY TOUR 08:30 ~ 17:00 (Lunch Included) US$67 Imjingak Pavilion → The Unification Bridge → ID Check → DMZ → Film Presentation → Exhibition Hall → The 3rd Infiltration Tunnel → Dora Observatory → Dorasan Station → Pass by Unification Village → Paju Shopping Outlet DMZ: Korea is the only divided country in the world. After the Korean War (June 25 1950 – July 27 1953), South Korea and North Korea established a border that cut the Korean peninsula roughly in half. Stretching for 2km on either side of this border is the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). Imjingak pavilion –The Unification Bridge – ID Check –DMZ –Film presentation -& Exhibition-Hall –The 3rdinfiltration tunnel – Dora observatory –Dorasan station –Pass by unification. It is strongly advised the attire should be casual with comfortable walking shoes as you will be walking inside tunnel. The guided tour will be followed with no one left astray as we move through the 3rd infiltration tunnel. (Every Monday – N/A) Paju Premium Outlets, Korea’s second Premium Outlet Center, is a one-hour drive from Seoul featuring 160 designer and name brand outlet stores at savings of 25% to 65% every day in an upscale, outdoor setting. (Some items may be excluded.) In addition to 160 stores, Paju Premium Outlets accommodates a food court with 600 seats and 20 restaurants & cafe to enhance the shopping enjoyment. Concierge service, stroller and wheelchair rentals and tour information are provided at the Information Center. Only 44 km (27 miles) from Seoul, the tunnel was discovered in October
    [Show full text]
  • Peace, Propaganda, and the Promised Land
    1 MEDIA EDUCATION F O U N D A T I O N 60 Masonic St. Northampton, MA 01060 | TEL 800.897.0089 | [email protected] | www.mediaed.org Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land U.S. Media & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Transcript (News clips) Narrator: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict dominates American news coverage of International issues. Given the news coverage is America's main source of information on the conflict, it becomes important to examine the stories the news media are telling us, and to ask the question, Does the news reflect the reality on the ground? (News clips) Prof. Noam Chomsky: The West Bank and the Gaza strip are under a military occupation. It's the longest military occupation in modern history. It's entering its 35th year. It's a harsh and brutal military occupation. It's extremely violent. All the time. Life is being made unlivable by the population. Gila Svirsky: We have what is now quite an oppressive regime in the occupied territories. Israeli's are lording it over Palestinians, usurping their territory, demolishing their homes, exerting a very severe form of military rule in order to remain there. And on the other hand, Palestinians are lashing back trying to throw off the yoke of oppression from the Israelis. Alisa Solomon: I spent a day traveling around Gaza with a man named Jabra Washa, who's from the Palestinian Center for Human Rights and he described the situation as complete economic and social suffocation. There's no economy, the unemployment is over 60% now. Crops can't move.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniting for the Shared Battle Short-Term Ceasefires in Middle East Conflicts to Prevent Humanitarian Disaster
    UNITING FOR THE SHARED BATTLE SHORT-TERM CEASEFIRES IN MIDDLE EAST CONFLICTS TO PREVENT HUMANITARIAN DISASTER October 2020 Mahnaz Lashkri - Brian Reeves SUMMARY The COVID-19 pandemic has reminded the world of the need to prevent a sudden unforeseen health crisis from leading to total ruin. A pandemic or similar major health crisis cannot alone be counted on to align the interests of the Middle East’s complex conflicts between states, non-state actors, and regional and extra-regional powers on the need for a ceasefire, but it could provide the context for a ripe moment to broker one. Short-term ceasefires, if built substantively and with critical buy-in from the most powerful actors, are achievable to facilitate humanitarian work to prevent or mitigate outbreaks amongst highly vulnerable populations in conflict zones. PROBLEM: CONFLICTS BLOCKING HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE IN THE WAKE OF A MAJOR HEALTH CRISIS The Middle East has sustained tremendous tumult in the past decade, leaving many countries already with sys- temic governance deficiencies even more vulnerable to instability. Being economically strained beyond their limits and racked by conflict, they are also unable to properly cope with refugee inflows. The threat COVID-19 poses for the conflict-ridden region has proven just how quickly a disaster can catch leaders off guard and potentially turn dire situations into uncontrollable catastrophes. New unforeseen major health crises for the region are inevitable, whether they be another pandemic or drought-induced famine, a particular danger as global temperatures rise. Standing in the way of a crisis response effort are the region’s ongoing conflicts and the competing interests of their belligerent parties and stakeholders, which often torpedo ceasefire attempts, no matter the humanitarian toll.
    [Show full text]
  • A Real Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula
    A Real Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1122358 Home > A Real Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula Monday, April 30, 2018 - 12:00am A Real Path to Peace on the Korean Peninsula The Progress and Promise of the Moon-Kim Summit Chung-in Moon CHUNG-IN MOON is Special Adviser for Foreign Affairs and National Security to South Korean President Moon Jae-in and a Distinguished University Professor at Yonsei University. Twelve hours in Panmunjom—the village in the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea that has long symbolized division and war—produced an unexpected miracle of peace [1] on Friday. In the Panmunjom Declaration, Moon Jae-in [2] and Kim Jong Un, the leaders of South and North Korea, pledged that “there will be no more war on the Korean Peninsula and thus a new era of peace has begun.” Given North Korea’s military provocations, the growing North Korean nuclear arsenal [3], and the acute sense of crisis that has haunted South Koreans over the last year, such a reversal looks surreal. But after attending all three summits between the two Koreas (in 2000, 2007, and 2018), I believe that this latest one represents real progress and lays the groundwork for lasting peace. Although much commentary has focused on the remaining difficulties, which are considerable, it has missed just how much was accomplished last week. Moon and Kim did not just make high-level commitments; they also laid out specific timetables for implementing them and took concrete steps that will have immediate effects in facilitating cooperation and preventing conflict [4].
    [Show full text]