For Official Use Only
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AUM International Student Handbook
International Student Handbook *Although the content of this handbook represents the most current information at the time of publication, changes may be made with respect to the information contained herein without prior notice. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 WELCOME 5 OFFICE OF GLOBAL INITIATIVES 6 ABOUT AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT MONTGOMERY 7 WARHAWK TRADITIONS 7 PREPARING FOR TRAVEL 8 HOW TO GET YOUR VISA 8 ARRIVAL DATE 9 ARRIVAL AT A U.S. PORT OF ENTRY 9 WHAT TO BRING TO THE USA 10 AIRPORT PICKUP SERVICE 11 PREPARING FOR ARRIVAL 11 AUM EMAIL ACCOUNT 11 LIKE US ON FACEBOOK 12 MY.AUM.EDU 12 ESTIMATED COST OF TUITION AND FEES 12 INTERNATIONAL STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP 13 HOUSING 14 NEW STUDENT CHECKLIST 17 ARRIVAL 18 ARRIVAL AND ORIENTATION 18 HEALTH INSURANCE 18 VACCINATIONS 19 ACADEMIC ADVISING 19 INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER CREDITS 19 AUM STUDENT IDENTIFICATION CARD (WARHAWK CARD) 22 HOW TO PAY TUITION AND FEES 22 PAYMENT PLANS 22 ARRIVAL CHECKLIST 23 IMMIGRATION MATTERS 24 F-1 VISA STATUS 24 J-1 VISA STATUS 24 DO'S AND DON'TS (ASK BEFORE YOU ACT) 25 REDUCED COURSE LOAD 25 ONLINE COURSES 26 2 TRANSIENT ENROLLMENT AT ANOTHER INSTITUTION 27 EMPLOYMENT (ON-CAMPUS WORK VS. OFF-CAMPUS WORK) 27 OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING (OPT) 28 24-MONTH STEM OPTIONAL PRACTICAL TRAINING EXTENSION 29 CURRICULAR PRACTICAL TRAINING (CPT) 30 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 30 TAXES 30 TRAVEL 32 CHANGE OF ADDRESS 32 CHANGE OF MAJOR 32 PROGRAM EXTENSION / RENEWING YOUR I-20 32 RENEWING YOUR VISA 33 ACADEMIC LIFE 33 ACADEMIC CALENDAR 33 CLASS SCHEDULE 33 DEGREE REQUIREMENTS -
Birthright Citizenship and the Alien Citizen
Fordham Law Review Volume 75 Issue 5 Article 10 2007 Birthright Citizenship and the Alien Citizen Mae M. Ngai Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mae M. Ngai, Birthright Citizenship and the Alien Citizen, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2521 (2007). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol75/iss5/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Birthright Citizenship and the Alien Citizen Cover Page Footnote Professor of History, Columbia University. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol75/iss5/10 BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP AND THE ALIEN CITIZEN Mae M. Ngai* The alien citizen is an American citizen by virtue of her birth in the United States but whose citizenship is suspect, if not denied, on account of the racialized identity of her immigrant ancestry. In this construction, the foreignness of non-European peoples is deemed unalterable, making nationality a kind of racial trait. Alienage, then, becomes a permanent condition, passed from generation to generation, adhering even to the native-born citizen. Qualifiers like "accidental" citizen,1 "presumed" citizen,2 or even "terrorist" citizen3 have been used in political and legal arguments to denigrate, compromise, and nullify the U.S. citizenship of "unassimilable" Chinese, "enemy-race" Japanese, Mexican .aA X4 -1,;- otreit." "illegal aliens," 1.1 -U1 .-O-.. -
Immigration Manual
Immigration Manual November 2006 Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “partner” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. © 2006 Baker & McKenzie All rights reserved. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study or research permitted under applicable copyright legislation, no part may be reproduced or transmitted by any process or means without prior written permission. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER. The material in this booklet is of the nature of general comment only. It is not offered as advice on any particular matter and should not be taken as such. The firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this booklet. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in it without taking specific professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances in issue. Immigration Manual Immigration Manual INTRODUCTION This manual is designed to provide a general overview of the immigration laws and procedures of various countries. Please note that the immigration laws and procedures are constantly changing and are subject to new policies and developments. Therefore, this manual is not intended to be exhaustive and specific questions should be directed to the Executive Transfer and Immigration Department of Baker & McKenzie, Hong Kong. -
Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends
Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends Updated February 3, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43892 Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends Summary The ability to remove foreign nationals (aliens) who violate U.S. immigration law is central to the immigration enforcement system. Some lawful migrants violate the terms of their admittance, and some aliens enter the United States illegally, despite U.S. immigration laws and enforcement. In 2012, there were an estimated 11.4 million resident unauthorized aliens; estimates of other removable aliens, such as lawful permanent residents who commit crimes, are elusive. With total repatriations of over 600,000 people in FY2013—including about 440,000 formal removals—the removal and return of such aliens have become important policy issues for Congress, and key issues in recent debates about immigration reform. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides broad authority to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to remove certain foreign nationals from the United States, including unauthorized aliens (i.e., foreign nationals who enter without inspection, aliens who enter with fraudulent documents, and aliens who enter legally but overstay the terms of their temporary visas) and lawfully present foreign nationals who commit certain acts that make them removable. Any foreign national found to be inadmissible or deportable under the grounds specified in the INA may be ordered removed. The INA describes procedures for making and reviewing such a determination, and specifies conditions under which certain grounds of removal may be waived. DHS officials may exercise certain forms of discretion in pursuing removal orders, and certain removable aliens may be eligible for permanent or temporary relief from removal. -
Aliens (Consolidation) Act
K:\Flygtningeministeriet\2002\bekg\510103\510103.fm 31-10-02 10:7 k03 pz Consolidation Act No. 608 of 17 July 2002 of the Danish Ministry of Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs Aliens (Consolidation) Act The following is a consolidation of the Aliens Act, cf. Consolidation Act No. 711 of 1 August 2001, with the amendments following from Act No. 134 of 20 March 20021), section 2 of Act No. 193 of 5 April 2002, Act No. 362 of 6 June 2002, section 1 of Act No. 365 of 6 June 2002 and Act No. 367 of 6 June 20022). Parts of the amendments following from Act No. 134 of 20 March 2002 and Act No. 367 of 6 June 2002 have not been incorporated into this Consolidation Act, as the amendments have not yet entered into force. The time of their entering into force will be determined by the Minister, cf. section 2 of the Acts. Part I EC rules only to the extent that these limitations are compatible with those rules. Aliens' entry into and stay in Denmark (4) The Minister for Refugee, Immigration and 1. Nationals of Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Integration Affairs lays down more detailed pro- Sweden may enter and stay in Denmark without visions on the implementation of the rules of the special permission. European Community on visa exemption and on 2. (1) Aliens who are nationals of a country abolition of entry and residence restrictions in which is a member of the European Community connection with the free movement of workers, or comprised by the Agreement on the European freedom of establishment and freedom to pro- Economic Area may enter and stay in Denmark vide and receive services, etc. -
Fiscal Year 2019 Entry/Exit Overstay Report March 30, 2020
Fiscal Year 2019 Entry/Exit Overstay Report March 30, 2020 i Message from the Acting Secretary I am pleased to present the following “Fiscal Year 2019 Entry/Exit Overstay Report” prepared by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Pursuant to the requirements contained in Section 2(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Data Management Improvement Act of 2000 (Pub. L. No. 106-215), Fiscal Year 2020 Appropriations Act (Pub. L. No. 116-93), and House Report 116-125, DHS is submitting this report on overstay data. DHS has generated this report to provide data on departures and overstays, by country, for foreign visitors to the United States who were expected to depart in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 (October 1, 2018 - September 30, 2019). DHS is working with the U.S. Department of State (DOS) to share information on departures and overstays, especially as it pertains to the visa application and adjudication process, with the goals of increasing visa compliance and decreasing overstay numbers and rates. This report is being provided to the following Members of Congress: The Honorable Lindsey Graham Chairman, Senate Committee on Judiciary The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Judiciary The Honorable Jerrold Nadler Chairman, House Committee on Judiciary The Honorable Doug Collins Ranking Member, House Committee on Judiciary The Honorable Nita M. Lowey Chairwoman, House Appropriations Committee The Honorable Kay Granger Ranking Member, House Appropriations Committee The Honorable Richard Shelby Chairman, Senate Appropriations Committee The Honorable Patrick Leahy Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Committee The Honorable Bennie Thompson Chairman, House Committee on Homeland Security ii The Honorable Mike Rogers Ranking Member, House Committee on Homeland Security The Honorable Ron Johnson Chairman, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs The Honorable Gary C. -
Automatic Visa Revalidation Fact Sheet (For F and J Visas)
AUTOMATIC VISA REVALIDATION FACT SHEET (FOR F AND J VISAS) We recommend that all UTEP international students and exchange visitors review this Fact Sheet before traveling with an expired visa, and that they bring a copy (all pages) to the port of entry if any issues arise due to the expired visa when applying for admission. Most temporary (nonimmigrant) visitors to the United States must present a valid, unexpired U.S. visa, among other documents, in order to be admitted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). In some cases, individuals who meet all other admissions requirements may be admitted with an expired visa through a provision called Automatic Revalidation. The following conditions must be met in order to qualify: Consecutive absence from the United States totaled 30 days or less; Travel was limited to Mexico, Canada, or an adjacent island (except Cuba)1; Nonimmigrant status is maintained as documented by a valid (unexpired) admission stamp or I‐94 Arrival/Departure Record; Authorization for the current status continues to be valid, as documented on Form I‐20 for F visa holders or Form DS‐2019 for J visa holders; Application for a new visa is not pending/has not been rejected; and Not a citizen of a country designated by the United States as a state sponsor of terrorism2. The CBP officer at the port of entry has the discretion to determine whether a visa will be automatically revalidated. Automatic Revalidation is concretely outlined in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in two places: 8 CFR 214.1 and 22 CFR 41.112. -
USA Student Visa Checklist
USA Student Visa Overview Generally, a citizen of a foreign country who wishes to enter the United States must first obtain a visa, either a nonimmigrant visa for temporary stay, or an immigrant visa for permanent residence. You must have a student visa to study in the United States. Your course of study and the type of school you plan to attend determine whether you need an F visa or an M visa. To enter the United States to attend: You need the following visa category: University or college F High School Private elementary school Seminary Conservatory Another academic institution, including a language training program Vocational or other recognized nonacademic M institution, other than a language training program Students cannot travel on the Visa Waiver Program or with Visitor Visas A student visa (F or M) is required to study in the United States. Foreign nationals may not study after entering on a visitor (B) visa or through the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), except to undertake recreational study (non-credit) as part of a tourist visit. For more information on the VWP, see Visa Waiver Program. For short periods of recreational study, a Visitor (B) visa may be appropriate A visitor (B) visa permits enrollment in a short recreational course of study, which is not for credit toward a degree or academic certificate. Learn more about Visitor Visas. Study leading to a U.S. conferred degree or certificate is never permitted on a visitor (B) visa, even if it is for a short duration. For example, a student in a distance learning program that requires a period of time on the institution’s U.S. -
BCCC International Student Handbook
Baltimore City Community College International Student Handbook Rules, Regulations & Resources for F-1 Visa Students at BCCC International Student Services Phone: (410)462-8360 Fax: (410) 462-8345 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bccc.edu/international Revised February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome…………………………………………………… 3 Introduction……………………………………………….. 4 Where to Go with Questions……………………………. 5 Office of Admissions…………………………………….... 7 International Students Club……………………………... 8 Immigration Regulations………..……………………….. 9 Maintaining Your F-1 Visa Status………………………... 10 Immigration Terms, Documents and Forms…………… 13 Extension of Stay………………………………………….. 20 Credits and Grades………………………………………. 21 Foreign Transcript Evaluation Agencies………..……… 22 Confidentiality of Student Files…………………….……. 23 Paying for College………………………… …………….. 24 School Transfer…………………………………………… 25 Employment Authorization…………………………….… 26 Reinstatement…………………………………………..… 29 Travel Outside the U.S…………………………………… 30 Dependents in the U.S…………………………………… 31 Health Insurance …………………………………………. 32 Social Security Numbers…………………………………. 34 Tax Information……………………………………………. 35 Maryland Driver’s License/Identification Card……......... 36 Bank Account………………………………………............ 37 Housing …………………………………………………….. 38 Departure Information…………………………………...... 39 References ………………………………………………… 40 2 Welcome Message from the Director Welcome to Baltimore City Community College (BCCC). We are delighted that Baltimore City Community College is your college of choice to pursue higher education -
20190619135814870 18-725 Barton Opp.Pdf
No. 18-725 In the Supreme Court of the United States ANDRE MARTELLO BARTON, PETITIONER v. WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENT IN OPPOSITION NOEL J. FRANCISCO Solicitor General Counsel of Record JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General DONALD E. KEENER JOHN W. BLAKELEY TIMOTHY G. HAYES Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 [email protected] (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the stop-time rule, which governs the cal- culation of an alien’s period of continuous residence in the United States for purposes of eligibility for cancel- lation of removal, may be triggered by an offense that “renders the alien inadmissible,” 8 U.S.C. 1229b(d)(1)(B), when the alien is a lawful permanent resident who is not seeking admission. (I) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Opinions below .............................................................................. 1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................... 1 Statement ...................................................................................... 1 Argument ....................................................................................... 6 Conclusion ................................................................................... 14 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Ardon v. Attorney Gen. of U.S., 449 Fed. Appx. 116 (3d Cir. 2011) ...................................................................... -
Immigration Law and the Myth of Comprehensive Registration
Immigration Law and the Myth of Comprehensive Registration Nancy Morawetz†* and Natasha Fernández-Silber** This Article identifies an insidious misconception in immigration law and policy: the myth of comprehensive registration. According to this myth — proponents of which include members of the Supreme Court, federal and state officials, and commentators on both sides of the immigration federalism debate — there exists a comprehensive federal alien registration system; this scheme obligates all non-citizens in the United States to register and carry registration cards at all times, or else face criminal sanction. In truth, no such system exists today, nor has one ever existed in American history. Yet, federal agencies like U.S. Border Patrol refer to such a system to justify arrests and increase enforcement statistics; the Department of Justice points to the same mythic system to argue statutory preemption of state immigration laws (rather than confront the discriminatory purpose and effect of those laws); and, states trot it out in an attempt to turn civil immigration offenses into criminal infractions. Although this legal fiction is convenient for a variety of disparate political institutions, it is far from convenient for those who face wrongful arrest and detention based on nothing more than failure to carry proof of status. Individuals in states with aggressive “show me your papers” immigration laws or under the presence of U.S. Border Patrol are particularly at risk. In an effort to dispel this dangerous misconception, this Article reviews the history of America’s experimentation with registration laws and the † Copyright © 2014 Nancy Morawetz and Natasha Fernández-Silber. -
Alienage Jurisdiction and “Stateless” Persons and Corporations After Traffic Stream
PUTTING THE “ALIEN” BACK INTO ALIENAGE JURISDICTION: ALIENAGE JURISDICTION AND “STATELESS” PERSONS AND CORPORATIONS AFTER TRAFFIC STREAM Robert Bernheim∗ INTRODUCTION In 1994, the representatives for nine Palestinians killed by Israeli dispersion of CS gas (teargas) brought a wrongful death suit against the American manufacturer of the gas in a federal district court.1 However, Judge William L. Standish dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.2 The problem was that the case was based on alienage diversity jurisdiction, but the Palestinian plaintiffs were neither citizens nor subjects of any recognized state.3 This disturbing example is not an isolated jurisdictional fluke. Many companies have not been able to take advantage of U.S. federal courts because they are based out of foreign dependencies of other nations.4 Alternatively, American plaintiffs have occasionally been frustrated in their attempts to hold stateless parties accountable.5 The analysis of the law in this area is limited and unclear, and Abu-Zeineh was perfectly positioned to expose cracks in the system. Resolution of the ambiguities and contradictions in this area would streamline private international law practice, alleviate unfairness to often marginalized groups, and support the welfare and commerce of the United States. ∗ J.D. Candidate, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, 2006. I want to thank Michael Catlett, Roopali Desai, Joe Lin, Tom Raine, and Lindsay St. John for their valuable suggestions. Special thanks also go to Ann Redd and Emily Gust for understanding the madness. 1. Abu-Zeineh v. Fed. Labs., Inc., 975 F. Supp. 774 (W.D.